Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
IN
$~9
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 1352/2015
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Manoj Ohri, Senior
Advocate / Amicus curiae
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing
Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Chaitanya
Gosain, Adv. for State.
Mr. Sumer Kumar Sethi, Advocate for
DSLSA
Ms. Meher Dev, Advocate with Prof.
Mrinal Satish and Prof. Aparna Chandra
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
ORDER
% 05.04.2018
1. Report has been filed by Mr. Manoj Ohri, learned Senior
Counsel / Amicus Curiae which has been taken on record.
2. Additionally, Dr. Aparna Chandra and Prof. (Dr.) Mrinal
Satish have filed a report dated 5th April, 2018, which has also been
taken on record.
2. The report filed by Dr. Aparna Chandra and Prof. (Dr.)
Mrinal Satish is pursuant to our order dated 7th November, 2017,
regarding bail related issues pertaining to Jail No.6, Central Jail,
Tihar, which houses women prisoners. The report is based on
examination of the reports of the prisoners with extremely pertinent
accused in this case has been tried for the offence punishable under
Section 307/34 IPC; that she has been in custody since 25 th June,
2014; has applied for bail seven times and all 7 applications are
rejected mainly on the grounds of serious offences. Dr. Mrinal
Satish has pointed out that as per the guide lines in (1996) 3 SCC
8422, R. D.Upadhyay v. State of Andhra Pradesh that this
prisoner be granted bail since trial has continued against her for
more than two years.
7. In yet another Case No. 86209/2016 State Vs. Sunita pending
in the Court of ASJ-01 Shahdara, it is submitted that the accused
has been in custody since 15th June, 2016; the charge sheet
originally filed states that accused has committed offence
punishable under Section 406/420/506 read with Section 120B of
the IPC and that she would be also entitled to the benefit of bail in
terms of directions in R.D.Upadhyay (supra).
8. Let copy of this order be sent to Member Secretary, Delhi
State Legal Services Authority to take steps to examine the
position in the above two cases and take steps in accordance with
law at the earliest.
9. The Delhi Police shall ensure that no charge-sheet is filed in
any case without the written consent and approval of the
Prosecution Branch. Appropriate directions in this regard shall be
passed by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi and communicated to
all investigating officers.
10. Let a copy be also sent to Director, Delhi Judicial Academy;
Commissioner of Police; and Member Secretary, DSLSA, to
ensure compliance.
11. List on 1st May, 2018.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
APRIL 05, 2018
gb