Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In previous articles for the CBW Conventions Bulletin, the There are four legal instruments which constitute the
regimes for the control of transfers of “banned and severely international regime for narcotic drugs and psychotropic
restricted chemicals” — the Rotterdam Convention for substances: the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs;
Prior Informed Consent — and for the control of High the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances; the 1972
Production Volume (HPV) chemicals have been considered Protocol Amending the Single Convention; and the 1988
and their potential relevance to the Chemical Weapons United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic
Convention regime explored.1 This article continues this Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
process by considering further control regimes for
chemicals — those for narcotic drugs and psychotropic The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961
substances. These are also dual purpose chemicals as they This was adopted by states at a special international
have permitted medical uses as well as prohibited uses. conference in 1961. It entered into force in 1964 after the
They are also subject to international conventions requiring deposit of the 20th instrument of ratification. This
the monitoring of manufacture, production and Convention replaced the treaties concluded before World
international trade of such substances and of precursors and War II on opiates, cannabis and cocaine. At present,
essential chemicals used in the illicit manufacture of control is exercised under this Convention of some 118
narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. narcotic drugs, including opium and its derivatives, as well
The control regimes for such drugs and psychotropic as synthetic narcotics such as methadone and pethidine. As
substances is of particular interest as the use of such of 2 January 2001, this Convention had 172 states parties.
materials for purposes other than those not prohibited under The general obligations in Article 4 General Obligations
the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) — purposes not require the parties to:
prohibited under the CWC are defined in Article II take such legislative and administrative measures as may be
Definitions and Criteria as meaning: necessary:
(a) Industrial, agricultural, research, medical, (a) To give effect to and carry out the provisions of the
pharmaceutical or other peaceful purposes; Convention within their own territories;
(b) Protective purposes, namely those purposes directly (b) To cooperate with other States in the execution of this
related to protection against toxic chemicals and to Convention; and
protection against chemical weapons; (c) Subject to the provisions of this Convention, to limit
(c) Military purposes not connected with the use of exclusively to medical and scientific purposes the
chemical weapons and not dependent on the use of the production, manufacture, export, import, distribution
toxic properties of chemicals as a method of warfare; of, trade in, use and possession of drugs.
(d) Law enforcement including domestic riot control
purposes.
The substances under control are divided into four
Schedules. To those familiar with the CWC Schedules, the
— would be subject to the general purpose criterion of the schedules for the Single Convention are more complex.
CWC and, in the case of materials of natural origin, by the These are detailed in Article 2 Substances under Control:
general purpose criterion of the Biological and Toxin Schedule I - these drugs are subject to all measures of
Weapons Convention (BWC). Insofar as some narcotic control applicable under the Convention and in particular to
drugs and psychotropic substances are the natural products those prescribed in certain Articles.
of living material — or synthetically produced analogues of Schedule II - these drugs are subject to the same measures
such natural products — they can be regarded as falling of control as drugs in Schedule I with the exception of
under both the CWC and the BWC. measures presented in Article 30, paragraphs 2 and 5 in
The control of narcotic drugs has been of global concern respect of retail trade.
ever since the first international conference on the subject Schedule III - these drugs are subject to the same measures
was held in Shanghai in 1909. The international control of control as preparations containing drugs in Schedule II
system has been developed under a number of treaties except that specific paragraphs of Article 31 and 34 need
starting in 1912 with the adoption of the International Opium not apply and that for the purposes of estimates (Article 19)
and statistics (Article 20), the information required shall be
Convention. During the past 40 years a series of treaties
restricted to the quantities of the drugs used in the
adopted under the auspices of the United Nations require that manufacture of such preparations.
Governments exercise control over the production and Schedule IV — these drugs shall also be included in
distribution of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, Schedule I and subject to all measures of control applicable
combat drug abuse and illicit traffic, and maintain the to drugs in the latter Schedule and in addition thereto further
necessary national infrastructure and report to international measures should the State Party, in its opinion, require such
organs on their actions. measures.
The period under review, from late December 2000 until prosecution of international crime, to come together to
early March 2001 was dominated by discussion of the discuss the penal enforcement of international treaties like
budget of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical the CWC. The proceedings included a presentation of the
Weapons (OPCW) and the programme of work of its Harvard Sussex Program Draft Convention to Prohibit
Secretariat for 2001. The two main difficulties encountered Biological and Chemical Armament Under International
were a cash flow problem and the identification of several Criminal Law by HSP Director Mathew Meselson.
structural problems in the budget, especially in relation to
reimbursements under Article IV and VI.
A large shortfall in the 2000 budget and forecasted Executive Council
underfunding for the 2001 programme of work, resulting
from a convergence of numerous factors, both internal and The twenty-third session of the Executive Council met
external, was revealed in the first weeks of the year and during 20–23 February.
intensive efforts were undertaken to address deficiencies in The Council also met in informal sessions during the
the process by which the OPCW budget is constructed and period under review. The first such meeting took place on
approved. The Secretariat’s response to the financial 26 January — following a briefing given to Council
situation included the imposition of austerity measures members by the Director-General on 17 January — and
designed to bring the programme of work in line with the addressed the financial situation of the Organization
funds available; consequently, reductions in verification and including matters relating to the 2000, 2001, and 2002
international cooperation activities, as well as in other areas, budgets. Informal consultations on the 2001 budget led by
were implemented during the period under review. coordinator Mark Albon (South Africa), critical because of
The Organization gained two further members following the austerity measures applied by the Secretariat, continued
the ratifications by Zambia and Dominica of the Chemical on 12 February. An additional informal meeting was
Weapons Convention (CWC). Both the Southern African convened on 19 February to discuss progress on chemical
Development Community (SADC) and the Organization of weapons destruction and the destruction and conversion of
Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), regional organizations to chemical weapon production facilities (CWPFs). The next
which Zambia and Dominica belong, were the focus of informal meeting on the same topic was scheduled to take
Secretariat outreach and international cooperation place on 2 April, and similar meetings were planned for three
programmes in 2000. By mid-March, after entry into force additional occasions during 2001.
of the Convention for these two countries, the Convention In his opening statement to the Council, the
would have 143 states parties and 31 signatories. The 1972 Director-General warned against the degradation of the
Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC) also has Organization’s programme of work — especially as regards
143 states parties, 115 of which it shared with the CWC. the verification regime and international cooperation —
In addition, the OPCW hosted the “International resulting from the current impasse over the Organization’s
Symposium on Cooperation and Legal Assistance for the budget and finances. He highlighted four challenges facing
Effective Implementation of International Agreements” the Organization in the immediate future:
during 7–9 February. This represented one of the first • universal membership to the treaty, especially in
opportunities for individuals from government agencies, Northeast Asia and the Middle East where adherence to
international organizations, national police forces, and the the CWC could play an important role mitigating the
academic community, concerned with the prevention and ongoing violence and tension in those regions;