FBI RAID AND INTERFERENCE WITH ONGOING CIVIL LITIGATION

UNDER FALSE AND ABSURD PRETENSES OF “stalking”, “18 U.S.C. § 2261A”

HOW U.S. GOVERNMENT COVERS UP COURTHOUSE CORRUPTION:

FILE # 316A-TP-73337, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

1. On 09/08/2010, and after hundreds of written Complaints about Government corruption, the
armed FBI SWAT team reportedly seized, e.g., nine (9) computers:
a. SONY
b. SONY
c. ACER
d. TOSHIBA
e. DELL
f. SONY
g. ACER
h. HP
i. DELL

2. The plaintiff public corruption victims disagree with the

a. Record human rights violations;
b. Intimidation and threats;
c. Government oppression;
d. Wrongful criminal investigation/prosecution for concealment and cover-up purposes;
e. Interference with ongoing civil litigation in favor of Defendant corrupt Officials.

3. Here, Government seizure, intimidation, and threats of incarceration were for purposes of, e.g.:
a. Interfering with ongoing prosecution of Government Officials;
b. Concealing Government corruption;
c. Framing of public corruption victims;
d. Government covering up for Government.

4. The FBI knew that

a. Plaintiffs are European citizens;
b. Plaintiffs were partially abroad and/or away.

5. The attached FBI “Seizure” Receipt

a. Did not list the seized Panasonic Camera;
b. Confused the alleged “rooms”;
c. Did not properly identify the “rooms”;
d. Did not properly identify the “walls”.
6. Here, it is unclear WHERE “approx. 16pgs re Judge Honeywell” were seized and WHY.
7. The purported numbering [1, 2 …]
a. Did not properly “describe the items” and/or count them;
b. Did not match with the packaging the FBI showed at the search scene.
8. E.g.: The “Sony Vaio” receipt information
a. Did not match with the original packaging and purchasE data.
9. E.g.: The “Acer” receipt information
a. Did not match with the original packaging and purchase data.
10. It appeared that the purposes of the search and seizure were, e.g.:
a. To destroy conclusive evidence of Government corruption and organized crime;
b. To destroy electronically stored evidence of organized Government crimes under
frivolous and false pretenses of “stalking”;
c. To frame, arrest and/or jail pro se litigant/plaintiff victims of public corruption.

11. On 09/08/2010, the FBI SWAT seizure team displayed deadly weapons in large numbers.
12. The FBI agent reported that
a. Defendant Jack Neil Peterson is using a concealed weapon;
b. “All alarms go off each and every time the pro se plaintiffs enter the Fort Myers
Courthouse”.
No reasonable explanation was provided. WHY do alarms go off?
Plaintiffs construe the reported use of a concealed weapon by a Defendant in civil cases as a
disturbing threat of violence. Apparently, the record proof of Government corruption in
multiple civil cases “alarms” crooked Government Officials.
13. On 09/08/2010, the FBI agent showed two (2) pictures:
a. One picture of a judge;
b. One picture of a Government tank.
Here, no reasonable and/or intelligent link between said two pictures in the public domain and
the alleged stalking was provided. Pictures of public officials and foreign Government tanks
could not possibly related to stalking. E.g., pictures of judges decorate the Naples Courthouse
walls. Plaintiffs have no access to any tank. No weapons to inflict any bodily injury or death
were identified.
14. Plaintiffs substantially spent their professional lives in the delivery of health care, and the
allegations of violence were absurd and fabricated.
15. The legislative intent of “18 U.S.C. § 2261A” was
a. NOT to coerce pro se whistleblowers to refrain from prosecution;
b. NOT to shut up and silence litigants and public corruption whistleblowers;
c. NOT to inflict emotional distress upon plaintiffs in ongoing litigation;
d. NOT to interfere with ongoing civil litigation;
e. NOT to obstruct redress of Government grievances;
f. NOT for the presiding judge [Purcelli] in ongoing civil litigation to intimidate
plaintiffs;
g. NOT to interfere with service upon Defendants in civil proceedings.
16. The 09/08/2010 call by law enforcement [“ruse”] was deceptive and for improper purposes of
engaging the litigant without any warrant.

EXHIBIT: DEFENDANT JACK NEIL PETERSON SCRIBD TEXT TO “DOC BUSSE”:

“ROOM” CONFUSION
“Room A”
“Room C”
“Room F”
“Room G”
 FBI TAMPA CONSTRUES SCRIBD.COM PUBLICATIONS AS “criminal” AND
SEIZES PUBLIC CORRUPTION VICTIMS’ COMPUTERS
UNDER FALSE PRETENSES OF “stalking”, 18 U.S.C. 2261

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

COERCION OF PRO SE CORRUPTION WHISTLEBLOWERS AND LITIGANTS

TO REFRAIN FROM FURTHER PROSECUTION OF DEFENDANT CORRUPT OFFICIALS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bi98LVsGAls

“YOU REACHED SPECIAL AGENT DAVID E. NELSON OF THE 10TH DIVISION OF THE FBI
[TAMPA, FLORIDA] …”

“Hi, this message is for Special FBI Agent David E. Nelson. We are reporting back to Agent Nelson
regarding 3 issues concerning the search by the FBI on September 8, 2010, in Naples Florida.

FIRST, thank you Agent Nelson for your call regarding the missing camera. The camera has been
missing after the Naples FBI search.on said day, 09/08/2010.

SECOND, during your search, you had reported Defendant Jack Neil Peterson’s concealed weapon
license. In response to your information regarding Defendant Peterson’s concealed weapon use, we
would like to notify you and the FBI that the active use of WWW.SCRIBD.COM, a publishing web
site, is limited to members only. SCRIBD.COM itself defines the service as a publishing site for
members only.

In this case, Defendant Jack Neil Peterson proceeded to obtain the SCRIBD.COM USER ID
“thedoctor2001” to engage in the conduct evident from Defendant Peterson’s multiple
communications to “Doc Busse”.
No person “in reasonable fear of death” or “serious bodily injury” could have possibly made
Defendant Peterson’s published communications at that website [See 18 U.S.C. § 2261A].

THIRD, we are not aware of any WWW.SCRIBD.COM membership by Defendant [corrupt U.S.
Judge] Charlene E. Honeywell. Here, it was impossible to personally interact with Def. Honeywell, a
SCRIBD-non-member Here, no interaction with Def. Honeywell took place or could have possibly
taken place on WWW.SCRIBD.COM.

Thank you very much for your attention.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bi98LVsGAls
Dear Special Agent David E. Nelson:

The acquisition of a concealed weapon is not any valid defense against the well-proven crimes of a
corrupt Government Official such as here, e.g., Defendant Jack Neil Peterson. Otherwise, any crooked
Government Official who is being prosecuted in a court of law could simply obtain a concealed
weapon and falsely claim and pretend “reasonable fear of death” and/or serious bodily injury. Such
practice and pattern would further encourage more rampant Government corruption, concealed weapon
use, and unlawful search and seizure.
The evidence of Government corruption and organized crime you seized on 09/08/2010 conclusively
proved the crimes by Defendant crooked Government Official Jack N. Peterson and his
communications to “Doc Busse”. See WWW.SCRIBD.COM.