Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Plan
Pre-Assessment………………………………………………………………..Page 2
Formative Assessment 1……………………………………………………...Page 15
Formative Assessment 2……………………………………………………...Page 18
Formative Assessment 3……………………………………………………...Page 21
Post-Assessment………………………………………………………………Page 24
Lesson Plans
Lesson Plan 1…………………………………………………………………..Page 31
Lesson Plan 2…………………………………………………………………..Page 35
Lesson Plan 3…………………………………………………………………..Page 39
Student Feedback………………………………………………………………...Page 44
Overview……………………………………………………………………………...Page 47
Pre-Assessment
Pre-Assessment Reflection
This instructional plan was created for 4th grade math. This pre-assessment was
done at the beginning of the math unit and includes the various concepts to be learned
by the end of the unit. My students are very familiar with the idea of pre-assessments
because they have to do them for each unit. This specific pre-assessment assesses
students’ prior knowledge of symmetry, angle names and measures, parallel vs
perpendicular, perimeter, and area. Before handing out the pre-assessment, I took the
time to read through all of the questions, give directions for use of materials, and to
remind them not to worry and to just do their best. Materials were provided to help the
students during the pre-assessment such as protractors and geoboards. I also
discussed with the students that they should go through the pre-assessment first and
complete the problems that they think they know how to do before trying the more
difficult problems. This helped me to get a more accurate idea of what students know,
even if they did not have time to complete the entire assessment.
This pre-assessment is set up in the same way as all of their previous pre-
assessments, so they were familiar with the format. This pre-assessment has 6
questions, each with sub questions. The pre-assessment as a whole is out of 25 points,
each question/sub question is worth 1 point, and 3 questions are worth 3 points each for
a total of 25. The pre-assessment data spreadsheet breaks down each question based
on common core state standards and by point value. The average score for the pre-
assessment was a 12.75 or 51% and the median was 12.5 or 50%. According to the
rubric for scoring, if the total score/level of proficiency is between 7-25 points tier 1 and
tier 2 supports should be able to provide enough instruction to get the students at level
by the end of the unit. If the total score/level of proficiency is 6 or lower the students
may need tier 3 interventions. Based on the average and the median, most students
scored in the tier 1 or 2 instructional range. This tells me that I should be able to reach
most students by whole and small group instruction. However, there are 3 students who
scored in the tier 3 interventions range which tells me that I will need to differentiate
instruction, and reteach throughout. The 3 that scored the lowest are already pulled out
throughout the week to receive tier 3 math intervention. The top 3 highest scores for this
pre-assessment were 25, 21, and 19. The lowest 3 scores were 3,3, and 5. This tells
me that there may be a few students that might benefit from an accelerated unit,
whereas the lowest 3 would benefit from enrichment.
(Highest)
Lowest
Reflection
After having the students complete the first formative assessment, it was clear
who understood parallel, perpendicular, and intersecting lines. The first sample is from
one of the highest scoring students on the assessment. I can tell by how she answered
the questions that she gets the concepts and is ready to move on to the next one. The
second sample is from one of the lowest scoring students on the assessment. I can tell
by how he answered the questions that he does not fully understand the difference
between perpendicular and intersecting lines. I can also see that he may not have a
solid definition of each concept based on what he wrote to justify how he knew the
answers. This student is an English Language Learner and often benefits from small
group or one on one instruction to clarify concepts. After analyzing all of the students’
first formative assessments, I have created a small group to reteach these concepts to
those who need it for further understanding.
Formative Assessment 2
Lines & Angles Work Sample
(Highest)
(Lowest)
Reflection
After having students complete the second formative assessment, it was clear
who understood the concepts of lines and angles. The first sample is from one of the
highest scoring students on this assessment. I can see from her work that she has a
solid understanding of parallel and perpendicular lines as well as identifying angle
measures and using a protractor to measure angles. The second sample is from one of
the lowest scoring students on the assessment. I can see from his work that he still is
not fully grasping the concepts of parallel and perpendicular lines. I can also see that he
is not understanding how to identify or measure angles with a protractor. This is the
same student as the formative assessment 1 sample. After analyzing the students’
second formative assessment, I have created 2 small groups based on need to reteach
these concepts.
Formative Assessment 3
Thinking About Line Symmetry
(Highest)
(Lowest)
Reflection
After having the students complete the 3rd formative assessment in the plan, I
was able to see who understands the concept of symmetry and who doesn’t. The first
sample is from one of the higher scoring students on this formative assessment.
Through analyzing her answers I can see that she has a pretty solid understanding of
how to draw lines of symmetry, but may need to work on a more solid definition. The
second sample is the from one of the lowest scoring students on this formative
assessment. I can immediately tell that this student either did not try to complete this
assessment, or is completely lost. From the first and second question I am thinking that
he may have some sort of an idea of the concept of symmetry, but definitely needs
more direct instruction with this concept. Again I have created small groups based on
need from the data collected in this assessment.
Post-Assessment
Student Work Sample
Data- See Post-Assessment Spreadsheet
(Highest)
(Lowest)
Reflection
This post-assessment was created for a 4th grade math to assess students’
knowledge gained of symmetry, angle names and measures, and parallel vs
perpendicular lines. After having the students complete the post-assessment, I have a
much better understanding of what level of understanding they are at individually for
each of the concepts taught throughout this instructional plan. Since the pre-
assessment was technically for an entire unit, the post-assessment only assesses the
content covered in the three lessons taught for this instructional plan.
The average overall score on this post-assessment was 16 out of 21 or 76% and
the median was 18 out of 21 or 86%. This data gives an accurate representation of the
level to which most students understand the material learned throughout this plan.
There were 5 scores ranging between 5 and 14 that did not match with the
majority of the class. This tells me that these 5 students need additional help in either
tier 2 or tier 3 interventions. I created a small group with these students, and plan to find
additional activities and ways to practice for them to reach a higher level of
understanding.
After analyzing this data, I can see that about one one third of the class are in
this lower level of understanding, one third has a mid level understanding, and the last
third have a solid understanding. I also noticed that it seems as though the concept that
students struggled the most with was measuring and constructing angles. This shows
that they will require more practice using a protractor to measure and construct angles.
The results of this post-assessment show that there are students who would
benefit from tier 2 instruction on all three concepts taught throughout this instructional
plan. The results also show that there are some students who would benefit from an
accelerated math program. The large range in the levels of understanding in this group
of students tells me that they all could possibly benefit from working in small groups
more often rather than always doing whole group instruction. Small groups would allow
the work to be differentiated in ways that could help lower scoring students to succeed,
and higher scoring students to be challenged.
Lesson Plan 1
3. Accommodations; differentiating to
meet student needs
Daily practice is used to collect data, so
accommodations and differentiation can be
implemented in future lessons.
Doc cam
Parallel, Perpendicular, and Intersecting
Lines Worksheet
Dots & Lines Record Sheet
Dots & Lines Game Board
Spinner
Geoboards
10 red and 10 blue geobands
Red and Blue pens/pencils
Pencil
Lines and Designs Worksheet
Modeling: “I DO” Explain that you’re going to take the first
turn so students can see how to play the
game.
-Spin spinner
-Read the results with the class, and use a
blue rubber band to build a line all the way
across the board, either parallel or
perpendicular to the starting line,
depending on what the spinner indicated.
-Ask the students to use a blue pencil or
marker to record the results of your turn on
their sheets.
-Explain game of Dots & Lines before
students take their turn.
Checking for Understanding: Partner Share
Thumbs up, thumbs down
Formative assessment
Guided Practice: “WE DO” Have the students take their turn, and then
take turns back and forth until no more
rubber bands can be placed and all 16
squares have been formed.
Doc cam
Looking at Lines sheet
Lines and Angles Work Sample
Drawing 2D Figures sheet
Thinking about Triangles sheet
Pencil
Modeling: “I DO” Open the session by telling students that
they will continue to work with lines and
angles today. Review the lines learned in
the previous lesson. Allow time to practice
identifying and creating these lines.
Display the first of the two Thinking About
Lines Student Book pages.
Then review the problems on the rest of
the sheet with the class and give students
time to work on them.
Checking for Understanding: Partner Share
Thumbs up, thumbs down
Formative assessment
-Doc cam
-Thinking About Line Symmetry page
-Work Place Guide
-Mosaic Game Record Sheet
-Mosaic Game Challenge
-Work Place Instructions
-Pattern Block Symmetries page
-Pattern Blocks
Modeling: “I DO” Open session by reviewing parallel and
perpendicular Lines. Tell the students that
today you are going to introduce a new
way to think about shapes. As the students
watch, write line symmetry, symmetrical,
and line of symmetry on the board. Ask
students to turn and talk to discuss the
terms and then share. Display the Thinking
About Line Symmetry page and ask, “Do
the shapes in the two boxes confirm what
the students just shared? Why or why
not?” What do the shapes on the left have
in common? What do the shapes on the
right have in common?”
Guided Practice: “WE DO” Work with input from the students to
identify and draw in the lines of symmetry
on the shapes in the left-hand box of page.
Content lessons continue as part of a larger unit. The next three lessons focus on
working with polygons. My post instructional plan is to provide opportunities for students
to practice these concepts in different ways. I have a lesson planned using stations to
practice measuring angles with a protractor in small groups. After the students complete
all the stations they are given a card with an angle on it to measure. They then use
these angle cards to complete a loop activity. By providing students with this extension
activity, I hope to provide variety that will guide students into further understanding of
the concepts. I have also created small groups to reteach specific parts of concepts to
those who need it based on the data collected from both formative and summative
assessments.
Student Feedback
Reflection
Student feedback overall was positive as far as how the students felt about how I
presented the lesson and how clear my instructions were. The area that surprised me
the most was how students felt about their own learning. There were a couple of
students that shared that they did not feel good about their learning. After reviewing the
post-assessment data, those kids who did not feel good about their learning were also
those who did not do as well on the post-assessment. This lets me know that self-
esteem and level of confidence with the material may have affected their responses.
This shows me that I need to work on building these students up and finding
opportunities for them to feel better about their learning.
Overview
Introduction to content area
I decided to teach math for this instructional plan during total takeover. I wanted to
create the instructional plan for math for two reasons. The first being that math was the
first subject that I took over, and the second being that I hadn’t taught much math prior.
The school that I am currently teaching in uses the Bridges Math curriculum. My goal
was to teach parallel & perpendicular lines, angles, and symmetry through practice,
workplaces, and activities. The first lesson taught is an introduction to Parallel &
perpendicular lines, by playing the Dots and Lines workplace. The second lesson taught
parallel & perpendicular lines and angles, by practicing and collecting a work sample.
The third lesson taught is an introduction to symmetry, by playing the Mosaic workplace.
Standards
CCSS.MATH.4G
Draw and identify lines and angles, and classify shapes by properties of their lines and
angles.
1. Draw points, lines, line segments, rays, angles (right, acute, obtuse), and
perpendicular and parallel lines. Identify these in two-dimensional figures.
2. Classify two-dimensional figures based on the presence or absence of parallel or
perpendicular lines, or the presence or absence of angles of a specified size.
Recognize right triangles as a category, and identify right triangles.
3. Recognize a line of symmetry for a two-dimensional figure as a line across the
figure such that the figure can be folded along the line into matching parts.
Identify line-symmetric figures and draw lines of symmetry.
Key Components
Technology
In all of my lessons I used the doc cam to project worksheets, game instructions, and a
google doc of terms. The doc cam allowed me to model during the “I do” before
gradually releasing the students. It also allowed me to project the definitions and visual
of new terms, and to review learned terms.
Critical Thinking
Students used critical thinking in the first lesson to determine the difference between
parallel, perpendicular, and intersecting lines. In the second lesson, students thought
critically in order to identify and create parallel & perpendicular lines and angles. In the
third lesson, students thought critically to identify lines of symmetry and to create
symmetrical mosaics using pattern blocks.
Communication
Students were in constant communication during the majority of these lessons.
Students participated in group discussion, partner shares, and workplaces in partners.
During all of these activities students were also communicating nonverbally through
thumbs up, thumbs down.
Collaboration
The students collaborated with their peers when they participated in partner shares.
They had to work together to complete practice sheets. The students also had to
collaborate to play the workplace games.
Creativity
The students used a variety of materials to practice the concepts in these lessons. They
used geoboards, protractors, and pattern blocks to learn the various concepts in this
instructional plan.
Grouping Strategies
When grouping students I decide based on level of understanding and personality. I
often put an “anchor” student in each group that has the highest level of understanding
and then build the groups from there.
Differentiation
The students in this class are at various levels in terms of ability. Differentiation was
used for the EL student by providing further explanation and visuals.
Formative Assessments
All of the formative assessments used during these three lessons can be found in the
the formative assessments section of this instructional plan. There are also pictures, as
well as a reflection about these assessments located in this section.
Resources: