Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#644
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:40:19 PM
Last Modified: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:03:57 PM
Time Spent: 00:23:37
IP Address: 216.54.92.22

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1 Student Teacher's Name

Emily Simmons

Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-

6

Q3 Grade Taught Fourth Grade

Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

01/16//2018

Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

03/09/2018

Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement

Malibu Elementary School

Q7 School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Cheryl Gould

Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: chergou@regent.edu

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11 What time period is this evaluation for? Final

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) Superior

taught.
Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Superior
group.
Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of Superior
higher level thinking skills.
Links content with other subject areas and real world applications. Superior

Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Emily conveyed her knowledge of the grade-level content through well-selected learning activities.

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student Superior

learning needs.
Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Superior
adapts plans as needed.
Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior
transitions.
Plans for differentiated instruction. Proficient

Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Emily demonstrated solid lesson planning skills. She presented multiple lesson plans. Plans were aligned with the Virginia Beach
Objectives and with the Virginia's Standards of Learning. Her plans addressed differentiation with a focus on remediation. There was
evidence in the lesson plans of ongoing assessment. Emily will continue to grow in the area of articulating how she is differentiating
instruction to meet the needs of advanced learners as well as those who require remediation. She will consider differentiation in terms of
content, process, and product.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Superior
Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior
Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Superior
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Proficient

Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Emily provided sound instruction during my two observations. In each observation, she provided instruction to small-groups of students.
I did not observe Emily leading students using instructional technology. I rated her as proficient in this area, in part, due to her
cooperating teachers assessment of Emily use of technology. I hope to observe this for myself in the next placement. Emily is adept at
using a variety of instructional strategies to guide learning. Her cooperating teacher shared that Emily is adept at identifying deficits in
student academic performance where remediation may be warranted.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior
instruments
Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior
purposes.
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Developing

Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Emily used a variety of formative and summative assessments to evaluation student academic progress. She used data to plan for
remediation of students. She will continue to develop in giving quality feedback to students by fostering an ongoing, and richer dialogue
between teacher and student beyond brief "correct/incorrect" responses.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Superior

procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Superior
redirect, or reinforce behaviors.
Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, Superior
gender, and special needs.
Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and Proficient
responses.

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to
learning.

Emily provide sound classroom management during my two school visits through keeping students actively engaged in learning.

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior

critiques.
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Superior
professional interactions.
Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Exemplary
teachers and other school personnel.
Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Exemplary
interactions.

Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Emily made a good impression on her cooperating teacher and school community. She demonstrates high morale character and joy for
teaching.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Superior

placement.
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Superior
Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Superior
and develop learning targets.

Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.

Emily provided evidence of ongoing documentation of progress for Language Arts and Math. She used resulting data to pull-out
for remediation to address deficits. The cooperating teacher expressed that Emily does this well.

4/4