Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Original article
Abdullah.M. Zeyad
PII: S1018-3639(17)30007-7
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2017.04.004
Reference: JKSUES 245
Please cite this article as: Zeyad, Abdullah.M., Effect of Curing Methods in Hot Weather on the Properties of High-
Strength Concretes, Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences (2017), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.jksues.2017.04.004
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Effect of Curing Methods in Hot Weather on the Properties of High-
Strength Concretes
Abdullah. M. Zeyad
Table 2 Grading of coarse and fine aggregate. Table 3 Physical properties of polypropylene
fibers.
% Passing by weight Properties Fiber
Sieve size
(mm) Fine Coarse Density 0.91 kg/l
aggregate aggregate Fiber length 12 mm
19 100 100
Fiber diameter 18 micron
12.5 100 95
Softening point 160 °C
9.5 100 66.3
Specific surface area 200 m2/ kg
4.75 96.4 4.3
Tensile strength
2.36 92.5 1.4 350 MPa
(MPa)
1.18 78.4 0
0.60 40.8 0
0.30 11.6 0
0.15 3.1 0
Fineness -
2.8
Modulus
2.1.2. Aggregates 0.9%, respectively.
A crushed basalt rock with a maximum
2.1.2.1. Fine Aggregate
nominal size of 12.5 mm was used as the coarse
The particle shapes and grade of FAs are
aggregate and local natural sand was used as
the fine aggregate (FA). The coarse and fine important factors in high strength concrete
aggregates each had a specific gravity of 2.63 (HSC) production. In this investigation, natural
and 2.71 and water absorptions of 0.6% and desert sand, which conforms to ASTM C33
specifications (ASTM, 2004) was used. Table curing is shown in Table 1. In this study, the
3 illustrates the grading analysis of FA. optimal ratio of PFs was used. Several studies
2.1.2.2. Coarse Aggregate have reported that the optimum volumetric ratio
Table 4 shows that the grade of the coarse of PF that improves the properties of concrete
aggregate conforms to ASTM C33 is 0.22%.
specifications (ASTM, 2004). The specific
2.3. Preparation and casting of specimens
gravity, sulfate content, and the absorption of
In this investigation, the required quantities of
coarse aggregate are illustrated in Table2.
materials were weighed for the correct mixing
2.1.3. Polypropylene fibers. proportions. Then, cement was mixed with fly
In this investigation, 12 mm PFs were used. ash. The mixture was added to the coarse and fine
Some of their physical properties are provided aggregates. Then, all of the materials were mixed
in Table 3. while dry for two minutes. Water was added to
the mixtures in two stages: Half of the amount of
2.1.4. Superplasticizer
water was initially added at the start of concrete
High-reduce water range (HRWR)
mixing. The remaining water was then added after
superplasticizer, a new generation of
30 s of concrete mixing. To obtain a
copolymer-based superplasticizer (SP)
homogeneous mixture, the concrete was
designed for the production of self-compacting
continuously mixed for 3 min after the addition of
concrete (Viscocret 5030), was used in this
water. The casting immediately followed mixing,
study.
after carrying out the tests for fresh properties.
The top surface of the specimens was scraped to
2.2. Mix proportions
remove excess material and to achieve a smooth
The mix proportions of HSC were designed
finish. The specimens were removed from molds
based on the ACI method and the guidelines
after 24 h of storage under laboratory conditions.
provided in ACI 211.1 (ACI, 1991 ). Mix
Storage conditions were in accordance with
proportions were designed to achieve HSCs
ASTM C192. The specimens were then cured for
with compressive strengths that exceed 60 MPa
the indicated durations until testing time (ASTM
when cured via water immersion method for 28
C192, 2002).
days, as shown in Table 4. Water immersion
80
Humidity (%)
Relative
70
60
50
40
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98
Period of curing (day)
30
Wind ( Km/h)
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98
Period of curing (day)
36
Max. Temp. [˚C] Min. Temp. [ °C]
Temperature
33
30
(oC)
27
24
21
18
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98
Period of curing ( day)
2.5. Testing of the specimens mm x 150 mm x 150 mm. Indirect tensile tests
The HSC and HSCF properties of fresh were conducted in accordance with ASTM
concrete slump test were determined via slump C496. The dimensions of the standard cylinder
test in accordance with ASTM C143. The were 150 D x 300 H mm. Flexural tests were
compressive, indirect tensile and flexural conducted in accordance with ASTM C78. The
strength of hardened concrete samples were dimensions of the standard prisms were 100
tested in accordance with BS 1881: Part 116 mm x 100 mm x 500 mm. All tests were carried
using standard cubes with dimensions of 150 out on days 7, 14, 28, and 90 of curing. The
average value of the three specimens for each spraying water method. Compared with the
test age was determined and recorded. water immersion method, the wet gunny
method decreased compressive strength by
11.7%, 7.3%, and 7.9% at days 14, 28, and 90
3. Results and discussion of curing, respectively. At day 7 of curing, the
3.1. Fresh concrete tests compressive strength of concrete cured via the
wet gunny method slightly increased by 3.6%.
Table 5 shows the results of the slump test of
The increase in concrete strength may be
HSC and HSCF mixtures. Adding PFs to
attributed to hot weather with high humidity,
concrete mixtures decreased the slump test
which increased the rate of cement hydration
value of HSCF by 10.5% compared with those
during the early stage of curing. In addition, the
of HSC mixtures without PF.
decline in rates of HSC and HSCF increased
the compressive strength of samples cured via
Table 5 Slump test.
Mix Slump (mm) water spraying method compared with those of
HSC 190 samples cured via water immersion. Concrete
HSCF 170 strength at days 7, 14, 28, and 90 of curing
decreased by 5.6%, 13.8%, 13.2%, and 12.3%,
3.2. Compressive strength
respectively. Considering the percentage of
Figures 3, 4, and 5 the compressive strength of
reduction in compressive strength during the
HSCs cured using three different curing
design stage, the water immersion method
methods. As shown in Fig. 2, HSCs cured via
provides the best result in terms of concrete
water immersion under lab conditions at 23 °C
strength compared with wet gunny and water
±2 °C and 100% humidity had higher
spraying methods. Moreover, the percentage of
compressive strength compared with those
reduction in the compression strength of
cured via outdoor curing methods. Concrete
concrete may change depending on temperature
specimens cured via wet gunny method had
and relative humidity. The temperature and
higher compressive strength than those cured
relative humidity during this study are shown in
via water spraying. Figures 3 and 4 show
Fig. 2. Figure 4 provides the compressive
compressive strength development in HSC and
strength of PF-reinforced HSCs. Curing
HSCF concrete samples that were cured via the
methods have the same effect on the strength of
three different methods. Compressive strength
PF-reinforced HSC, as discussed above. In
continued increasing until day 90 of curing.
addition, results show that the most effective
Maximum compressive strength reached 74
curing method is water immersion, followed by
MPa when HSCF was cured via water
wet gunny, and then by water spraying. The
immersion. The minimum compressive strength
present results enhance the value of the
was 64.9 MPa in HSC cured for 90 days via
information obtained for HSC cured via the cured for 90 days via water immersion, wet
same methods as HSCF (Al-Gahtani, 2010; gunny, and water spraying methods were 3.2%,
Bouziadi et al., 2016; Ibrahim et al., 2013). The 7.9%, and 1%, respectively. These results
effects of curing methods on HSCF are further confirmed that the addition of 0.1% to
identical to those on HSC. Adding PFs to the 0.4% (volumetric ratio) PFs improves the
concrete mix slightly increased the compressive compressive strength of conventional concrete
strength of HSCF. The increase in the concrete and HSCs (Bouziadi et al., 2016).
strength of HSCF compared with that of HSC
80 80
Compressive strength
Compressive strength
70 70
60 60
50
(MPa) G
(MPa) G
50
40
30 40
20 30
10 20
7 days 14 days 28 days 90 days 7 days 14 days 28 days 90 days
HSCi 55.3 70.9 72.6 74 HSCFi 51.2 63 73.5 76.4
HSCw 57.3 62.6 67.3 68.1 HSCFw 55 60.7 70 73.5
HSCs 52.2 61.1 63 64.9 HSCFs 52.8 59.2 63.5 64.2
70 7 days
(MPa) 0
60 14 days
28 days
50
90 days
40
HSCi HSCw HSCs HSCFi HSCFw HSCFs
Figure 5 Results of Compressive Strengths Tests.
3.3. Indirect tensile strength the best results compared with other treatment
Figs. 6, 7, and 8 show the results obtained from methods. Furthermore, the addition of fiber the
the indirect tensile tests of HSC and HSCF concrete mixtures led to the improved results of
samples at the test ages of 7, 14, 28, and 90 indirect tensile test. Accordingly, HSCF
days. The indirect tensile results illustrated that improved more than HSC when the curing
the various methods of concrete curing exerted methods; immersion in water, wet coverage,
different effects on the strength of HSC and and spraying water; were applied: 14.1%,
HSCF mixtures (Akinpelu et al., 2017). In this 10.2%, and 8.9% at 90-day age test,
study, the water immersion methods achieved respectively.
6 6
(MPa) G
3
(MPa) G
3
2 2
1
7 days 14 days 28 days 90 days 1
7 days 14 days 28 days 90 days
HSCi 4.61 5.32 5.45 5.53
HSCFi 5.66 6.01 6.22 6.31
HSCw 4.52 5.14 5.33 5.46
HSCFw 5.41 5.74 5.93 6.02
HSCs 4.45 4.92 5.14 5.35
HSCFs 4.61 5.17 5.64 5.83
Figure 6 Results of Indirect Tensile Strengths Figure 7 Results of Indirect Tensile Strengths
Tests (HSC). Tests (HSCF).
6
Indirect Tensile
strngth (MPa)
7 days
4
14 days
2 28 days
90 days
0
HSCi HSCw HSCs HSCFi HSCFw HSCFs
Figure 8 Results of Indirect Tensile Strengths Tests.
Flexural strength
Flexural strength
6 6
5 5
(MPa) G
(MPa) G
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
7 days 14 days 28 days 90 days 7 days 14 days 28 days 90 days
HSCi 5.03 6.1 7.02 7.12 HSCFi 5.12 6.22 7.17 7.34
HSCw 4.93 5.31 6.41 7.01 HSCFw 5.05 6.13 6.7 7.22
HSCs 4.74 5.63 6.12 6.58 HSCFs 4.82 5.93 6.23 6.76
8
Flexural strength
6 7 days
(MPa) 0
4 14 days
28 days
2
90 days
0
HSCi HSCw HSCs HSCFi HSCFw HSCFs