Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
REDIT2011
TRANSACTIONS
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS depend on the existence of another
contract. (e.g. commodatum and
Q: What is credit? mutuum)
b. Accessory contracts – They have to
A: It is a person’s ability to borrow money by depend on another contract. These
virtue of confidence or trust reposed in him by accessory contracts depend on the
the lender that he will pay what he may promise. existence of a principal contract of
loan. (e.g. guaranty proper,
Q: What is credit transaction? suretyship, pledge, mortgage and
antichresis)
A: It refers to agreement based on trust or belief
of someone on the ability of another person to 3. As to their consideration
comply with his obligations. a. Onerous – This is a contract where
there is consideration or burden
imposed like interest.
Q: What do credit transactions include?
b. Gratuitous – This is a contract where
there is no consideration or burden
A: They include all transactions involving loans of:
imposed. (e.g. commodatum)
1. goods
2. servicew
Q: What is bailment?
3. money extended to another either
gratuitously or onerously with a
A: It is the delivery of a personal property for
promise to pay or deliver in the future.
some particular use, or on mere deposit, upon a
contract, express or implied, that after the
Q: What is security?
purpose has been fulfilled, it shall be redelivered
to the person who delivered it, or otherwise dealt
A: It is something given, deposited, or serving as a
with according to his directions, or kept until he
means to ensure the fulfillment or enforcement
reclaims it, as the case may be.
of an obligation or of protecting some interest in
the property.
Note: Generally, no fiduciary relationship is created
by bailment. No trustee‐beneficiary relationship is
Q: What are the types of security? created.
375
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA
U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
V CHAIR FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE: JEANELLE C. LEE
F
cha oc uCl ti v
a idl d e D e r e
In case of lease of the thing subject of Note: Mere issuance of checks does not perfect the
commodatum: contract of loan. It is only after the checks have been
encashed that the contact may be deemed
GR: The bailee can neither lend nor perfected. Further, when the movable thing
lease the object of the contract to a delivered in loan is not to be returned to the bailor,
third person. but may be substituted or replaced with another
equivalent thing, it is a fungible thing.
XPN: Members of the bailee’s
household may make use of the thing Q: Distinguish commodatum from mutuum.
loaned.
A:
Note: Members of the bailee’s household COMMODATUM
are not considered as third persons. Object
Non‐consumable (Non‐
XPN to the XPN: fungible)
Contrary stipulation; or Cause
Nature of the thing forbids such use. Gratuitous, otherwise it is a lease
Q: Distinguish commodatum from lease. GR: not its fruit because the bailor remains the owner
A: XPNs:
use of the fruits is stipulated;
enjoyment of the fruits is stipulated; or enjoymen
Subject Matter
Real or personal property
Contract
Contract of use
COMMODATUM
Real contract
Object is a non‐
consumable (non
fungible) thing
Essentially gratuitous
MUTUUM
Q: What is mutuum?
A:
Borrower acquires ownership of the thing.
If the thing loaned is money, payment must
be made in the currency which is legal
tender in the Philippines and in case of
extraordinary deflation or inflation, the
basis of payment shall be the value of
the currency at the time of the creation
of the obligation.
Q: Distinguish mutuum from: contract which cannot be perfected until the
Lease; and delivery of the object.
Barter. (see Article 1954) A:
Q: What are the governing rules on payment of
loan?
MUTUUM
A: It depends on the object of the contract of
loan.
Money – governed by Arts. 1249 and 1250,
NCC
379
U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA
B. OBLIGATIONS OF THE BAILOR AND BAILEE Q: Can the bailor demand the return of thing
loaned anytime he pleases?
BAILOR
A:
OBLIGATIONS OF THE BAILOR GR: No
A: When the following requisites are present: A: It depends. If there has been a demand on the
1. there was a flaw or defect in the thing part of the bailor before the loss of the thing
loaned; under the circumstances set forth under Art. 1942
2. the flaw or defect is hidden; (1) and (2) and the bailee did not return the thing,
then the latter is liable. However, if there has under Articles 1207 and 1208. Solidarity is
been no demand on the part of the bailor and the provided to safeguard effectively the rights of the
thing was lost, the bailor is estopped and cannot bailor over the thing loaned.
hold the bailee liable for under a contract of
precarium, the use of the thing by the bailee Note: The concurrence of two or more creditors or
depends on the pleasure of the bailor and no two or more debtors in one and the same obligation
time is fixed for such use. Hence, demand on the does not imply that each one of the former has a
part of the bailor is needed for the return of the right to demand, or that each one of the latter is
thing. Without such, loss of the thing on the bound to render, entire compliance with the
hands of the bailee will not make him liable. prestation. There is solidary liability only when the
obligation expressly so states, or when the law or
Note: Article 1942. The bailee is liable for the loss of the nature of the obligation requires solidarity. (Art.
the thing, even if it should be through a fortuitous 1207)
event:
If he devotes the thing to any purpose different If from the law, or the nature or the wording of the
from that for which it has been loaned; obligations to which the preceding article refers the
If he keeps it longer than the period stipulated, contrary does not appear, the credit or debt shall be
or after the accomplishment of the use for presumed to be divided into as many equal shares as
which the commodatum has been constituted; there are creditors or debtors, the credits or debts
xxx being considered distinct from one another, subject
to the Rules of Court governing the multiplicity of
Q: Must the bailor be the owner of the thing suits. (Art. 1208)
loaned?
OBLIGATIONS OF THE BAILEE
A: No. The bailor in commodatum need not be
the owner of the thing loaned. It is sufficient that Q: What are the obligations of a bailee?
he has possessory interest over subject matter
(Art. 1938, NCC). A:
As to ordinary expenses
Note: A mere lessee or usufructuary may
gratuitously give the use of the thing leased or in
usufruct, provided there is no prohibition against
such.
BAILEE
381
A: The contract ceases to be commodatum; it Note: Article 1942 (2) provides that the bailee is
becomes lease. liable for the loss of the thing, even if it should be
through a fortuitous event if he keeps it longer than
the period stipulated, or after the accomplishment
of the use for which the commodatum has been Who shall bear the costs for the van's fuel, oil
constituted. and other materials while it was with Tito?
Explain.
Q: What if the bailee is entitled to payment or
reimbursement of expenses incurred or damages A: The costs for the fuel and other materials are
sufered and the bailor ofers the thing loaned as considered ordinary expenses, and consequently
payment for said expenses or damages, would Tito, the bailee, shall shoulder them (Art. 1941,
such ofer be valid or not, in view of the NCC)
prohibition under Art. 1952 which states that the
bailor cannot exempt himself from the payment Does Pedro have the right to retrieve the van
of expenses or damages by abandoning the thing even before the lapse of one year? Explain.
to the bailee?
A: No, Pedro cannot demand the return of the
A: The offer is not valid. It may be considered as van until after the expiration of the one‐year
dation in payment. In this case, the abandonment period stipulated. However, if in the meantime he
done by the bailor was made in favor of the should have urgent need of the van, he may
bailee for the payment of the expenses incurred demand its return or temporary use.
by the latter, hence, a violation of what the law
has expressly prohibited under Article 1952. Who shall bear the expenses for the accidental
damage caused by the cargo truck, granting that
Q: When is the bailee not entitled to the truck driver and truck owner are insolvent?
reimbursement for the expenses he incurred? Explain.
A: If, for the purpose of making use and A: Both Tito and Pedro shall bear equally the
preservation of the thing, the bailee incurs costs of the extraordinary expenses, having been
expenses other than those ordinary and incurred on the occasion of actual use of the van
extraordinary expenses. by Tito, the bailee, even though he acted without
fault. [Art. 1949(2), NCC] (2005 Bar Question)
Q: Before he lef for Riyadh to work as a
mechanic, Pedro lef his van with Tito, with the C. INTEREST AND THE SUSPENSION OF THE
understanding that the latter could use it for one USURY LAW
year for his personal or family use while Pedro
works in Riyadh. He did not tell Tito that the Q: What is interest?
brakes of the van were faulty. Tito had the van
tuned up and the brakes repaired. He spent a A: It is nothing more than the compensation to be
total amount of P15,000.00. Afer using the paid by the borrower for the use of the money
vehicle for two weeks, Tito discovered that it lent to him by the lender.
consumed too much fuel. To make up for the
expenses, he leased it to Annabelle. Two months Q: What is the rule on interests?
later, Pedro returned to the Philippines and
asked Tito to return the van. A:
GR: No interest shall be due unless it is
Unfortunately, while being driven by Tito, the stipulated in writing. (Art. 1956, NCC)
van was accidentally damaged by a cargo truck
without his fault. XPN: In case of interest on damages or
indemnity for damages, it need not be in
Who shall bear the P15,000.00 spent for the writing.
repair of the van? Explain.
Q: What is the basis of the right to interest?
A: The contract between Pedro and Tito is one of
commodatum. Of the P15, 000.00 spent, Pedro, A: It only arises by reason of the contract
the bailor, shall bear the expenses for the repair (stipulation in writing) or by reason of delay or
of the faulty brakes, they being extraordinary failure to pay principal on which interest is
expenses incurred due to the non‐disclosure by demanded (Baretto v. Santa Marina, No. 11908,
the bailor of the defect or fault; Tito, on the other feb. 4, 1918).
hand, shall shoulder "that part of the P15,000.00
spent for the tune‐up”, said expense being If the obligation consists of the payment of a sum
ordinary for the use and preservation of the van. of money, and the debtor incurs delay, the
Q: Can there be interest in equitable mortgage? A: The legal interest thereon shall run only from
the promulgation of judgment of said court, it
A: No. Interest could not be collected on being at that stage that the quantification of
equitable mortgage because the same is not damages may be deemed to have been
stipulated in writing (Tan v. Valdehueza, G.R. No. reasonably ascertained. (Ibid)
L‐38745, Aug. 6, 1975).
Q: What is the actual base for computing such
Note: One which, although it lacks the proper legal interest?
formalities or other requisites of a mortgage
required by law, nevertheless reveals the intention A: It shall be the amount as finally adjudged by
of the parties to burden real property as a security the Supreme Court. (Ibid)
for a debt, and contains nothing impossible or
contrary to law.
Q: What is the basis for computation for
indemnity for damages?
Q: Can paid unstipulated interest be recovered?
A: It shall be the interest agreed upon by the
A: If paid by mistake the debtor may recover as in
parties and in the absence of stipulation, the legal
the case of solutio indebiti or undue payment.
interest which is 6% per annum (Art. 2208, NCC).
However if payment is made voluntarily, no
recovery can be made as in the case of natural Note: 6% because it is based on damages and it has
obligation. been said that judgments other than loans,
forbearance, etc. is based on 6%.
Q: Sabugo granted a loan to Samilin. The loan
agreement was not reduced in writing. Q: What are the classes of interest?
Thereafter, Sabugo demanded additional
interest which was paid by Samilin in cash and A:
checks. Upon advice of her lawyer, Samilin 1. Simple – interest which is paid for the
demanded for the return of the amount of use of the money, at a certain rate
interest paid. Is the payment of interest valid? stipulated in writing by the parties.
2. Compound – interest which is imposed
A: No. Payment of monetary interest is allowed upon accrued interest, that is, the
only if: interest due and unpaid.
1. there was an express stipulation for the 3. Legal – that interest which the law
payment of interest; and directs to be paid in the absence of any
2. the agreement for the payment of agreement as to the rate.
interest was reduced in writing.
Q: When can there be:
The concurrence of the two conditions is required
for the payment of monetary interest. Thus,
collection of interest without any stipulation
therefor in writing is prohibited by law. (Siga‐an v.
Villanueva, G.R. No. 173227, Jan. 20, 2009.)
A:
GR: No.
2. Art. 2209, NCC – 6% per annum in cases of: Q: Is a stipulation for floating interest valid?
a. Other sources (i.e. sale)
b. Damages arising from injury from A: No. While it may be acceptable for practical
person. reasons given the fluctuating economic conditions
c. Loss of property which does not for banks to stipulate that interest rates on a loan
involve a loan. not be fixed and instead be made dependent on
prevailing market conditions, there should be a
3. Interest accruing from unpaid interest – reference rate upon which to peg such variable
interest due shall earn interest from the interest rates [Consolidated Bank and Trust Corp.
time it is judicially demanded although the (Solid Bank) v. CA, G.R. No. 114672, Apr. 19,
obligation may be silent upon this point. 2001].
A: It signifies the contractual obligation of the A: Interest that which is imposed in a judgment
creditor to forbear during a given period of time as indemnity for damages.
to require the debtor payment of an existing debt
then due and payable. Such forbearance of giving Note: It need not be in writing and computed from
time for the payment of a debt is, in substance, a the time of the finality of decision.
loan (91 C.J.S. 598).
Q: A judgment was rendered ordering the
Q: What is the interest rate imposable for back defendant Maybel to pay Vanessa with legal
rentals? interest of 12% from the filing of the complaint
until paid. The decision became final and
executory. Maybel argues that the rate of 12%
Q: What is the rationale behind the validity of A: It is a contract whereby a person (depositor)
unconscionable Interest rate in a loan? delivers a thing to another (depositary), for the
principal purpose of safekeeping it, with the
A: The Supreme Court said nothing in said circular obligation of returning it when demanded.
(Circular 905) suspending Usury Law grants lender
authority to raise interest rates to levels which Q: When is a contract of deposit constituted?
will either enslave their borrowers or lead to a
A: From the moment a person receives a thing Subject Matter
belonging to another, with the obligation of safely
keeping it and returning the same upon demand.
A: The rent of safety deposit boxes is an ordinary Note: Depositary is liable for the loss
contract of lease of things and not a special kind if:
rd
of deposit because the General Banking Act as a. He deposits the thing to a 3 person
revised has deleted the part where banks are without authority, even though the
expressly authorized to accept documents or loss is due to fortuitous events
rd
papers for safe‐keeping. b. Deposits the thing to a 3 person
who is manifestly careless or unfit
The case of Sia v. CA, G.R. No. 102970, May 13, although there is authority.
1993 enunciating that a rent of a safety deposit
box is a special kind of deposit, was decided 4. If the thing should earn interest:
under the former General Banking Act. However, a. collect interest as it falls due
SC has not yet decided a case abandoning the b. take steps to preserve the value
ruling in Sia v. CA, making it conform with the and rights corresponding to it
new General Banking Act.
5. Not to commingle things if so stipulated
Fixed, savings and current deposits in banks and
other similar institutions are not true deposits but 6. GR: Not to make use of the thing deposited
are considered simple loans because they earn
interest. (Art. 1980, NCC) XPNs:
a. When preservation of thing
Q: Is ownership necessary in a contract of deposited requires its use
deposit? b. When authorized by depositor
c. GR: In such case it is no longer a PARTIES
deposit but a contract of loan or
commodatum, as the case may be. Q: Who are the parties to a contract of deposit?
XPNs to XPN: Even in case of loss through A: The guardian is not holding the funds of the
fortuitous event, still liable if (USAD): ward merely for safekeeping exclusively but also
a. Stipulated intended for the latter’s maintenance and
b. he Uses thing w/o depositor’s support. Losses, if any without the fault of the
permission guardian shall be deducted from the funds of the
c. he Delays its return ward (Phil. Trust Co. v. Ballesteros, No. L‐8261,
d. he Allows others to use it (even if April 20, 1956).
he himself is authorized to use it)
Q: What is the efect when the depositary has
9. Return the thing deposited with all its fruits, permission to use the thing deposited?
accessions, and accessories
10. Pay interest on sums converted to personal A:
use if the deposit consists of money GR: The contract loses the concept of a
deposit and becomes a loan or
Q: When is a voluntary deposit extinguished? commodatum.
A:
GR: The statement of the depositor shall be
accepted as prima facie evidence of the value
A: The depositor’s ownership over the thing Q: What is the right of the depositary if he has
carries with it the right to the fruits and all not been paid the amount due to him?
accessions thereto including:
A: The depositary may retain the thing in pledge
1. Natural fruits until full payment of what may be due him by
2. Industrial fruits reason of the deposit (Art. 1994, NCC).
3. Civil fruits (Art. 441, NCC)
Q: May the depositary sell the thing retained in
Q: When the deposit consists of money, what pledge?
must be returned upon the extinguishment of
contract? A: Yes, Article 2108 provides that if, without the
fault of the pledgee, there is danger, destruction,
A: The provision of Article 1896 shall apply impairment, or diminution in value of the thing
wherein the money deposited must be returned pledged, he may cause the same to be sold at
together with interest for the use thereof. The public auction. The proceeds of the auction shall
imposition of interest is in the form of penalty for be a security for the principal obligation in the
the use of money there being no agreement to same manner as the thing originally pledged.
pay the interest at the outset, otherwise, the (Pineda, p. 93, 2006 ed)
contract will be a mutuum.
Q: Maneja assigned and conveyed to Serrano her
Q: Can the depositary demand that the time deposit. Notwithstanding series of
depositor should prove his ownership of the demands for encashment of the aforementioned
thing deposited? time deposits, OBM refused to honor the time
deposits. Is OBM liable to Serrano despite the
A: fact the Central Bank declared that OBM could
GR: No. no longer operate due to its chronic reserve
deficiencies?
XPN: Should he discover that the thing has
been stolen and who its true owner is, he A: Yes. Bank deposits are in the nature of
must advise the latter of the deposit. irregular deposits. They are really loans because
they earn interest. All kinds of bank deposits,
Note: If the depositary has reasonable grounds to whether fixed, savings or current, are to be
believe that the thing has not been lawfully acquired treated as loans and are to be covered by the law
by the depositor, the former may return the same. on loans. Current and savings deposits are loans
to a bank because it can use the same. Serrano, in
Q: What should the depositary do if he loses the making time deposits that earn interest with OBM
thing through force majeure or government was in reality a creditor of the respondent bank,
order and receives money or another thing in its and not a depositor. The bank was in turn a
place? debtor of Serrano. Failure of OBM to honor the
time deposits is failure to pay its obligation as a
A: He shall deliver the sum or other thing to the debtor and not a breach of trust arising from a
depositor. depositary’s failure to return the subject matter
of the deposit. (Serrano v. Central Bank, G.R. No.
30511, Feb. 14, 1980)
DEPOSITOR 2.If the depositor was incapacitated at
the time of making the deposit, to his
Q: Who is a depositor? guardian or administrator or to the
depositor himself should he acquire
A: The depositor is the one who deposited the capacity (Art. 1970, NCC).
thing. 3. Even if the depositor had capacity at the
time of making the deposit but he
Q: What is the rule when there are two or more subsequently loses his capacity during
depositors? the deposit, the thing must be returned
to his legal representative (Art.1988,
A: If they are not solidary, and the thing admits of NCC).
division, each one cannot demand more than his Q: Where should the thing deposited be
share. returned?
A:
1. To the depositor, to his heirs and
successors, or to the person who may
have been designated in the contract
(Art. 1972, NCC).
B. NECESSARY DEPOSIT Q: What is the extent of the liability of the hotel
keepers in case of loss?
Q: When is deposit considered as necessary?
A:
A: 1. It covers liability in hotel rooms which
1. When it is in compliance with a legal come under the term “baggage” or
obligation; articles such as clothing as are ordinarily
2. It takes place on the occasion of any used by travelers.
calamity, such as fire, storm, flood, 2. It includes lost or damages in hotels
pillage, shipwreck, or other similar annexes such as vehicles in the hotel’s
events; garage.
3. Made by passengers with common
carriers; or Q: Can the keepers of the hotels or inns exercise
4. Made by travelers in hotels or inns. the right of retention?
Q: When can the keepers of hotels or inns be A: Yes, as security for credits incident to the stay
held responsible for loss of thing in case of at the hotel (in the nature of a pledge created by
deposit? operation of law).
A: They are not liable when: Q: When will the properties sequestered cease
1. loss or injury is caused by force to be in custodia legis?
majeure;
2. loss due to the acts of guests, his family, A: When the insolvency proceedings of a
his employees, or visitors; and partnership terminated because the assignee in
3. loss arises from the character of the insolvency has returned the remaining assets to
goods. the firm, said properties cease to be in custodia
legis (Ng Cho Cio, et al. v. Ng Diong & Hodges, L‐
Q: Are hotel or inn keepers still liable regardless 14832, Jan. 28, 1961)
of the posting of notices exempting themselves
from any liability? III. GUARANTY AND SURETYSHIP
A: B. EFFECTS OF GUARANTY
GUARANTY
Q: What are the obligations that may be secured
in a contract of guaranty?
A:
1. Valid obligations
2. Voidable obligations
3. Unenforceable obligations
4. Natural obligations – When the debtor
himself offers a guaranty for his natural
obligation, he impliedly recognizes his
liability, thereby transforming the
obligation from a natural into a civil one.
393
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
5. Conditional obligations – only in case of Q: State the general character of guaranty.
suspensive condition because it gives rise
to the principal and hence, gives rise also A:
to the accessory obligation. GR: Generally gratuitous (Art. 2048, NCC)
Note: Voidable contract is one which has all the XPN: Stipulation to the contrary.
essential elements of a valid contract, except that
the element of consent is vitiated. It is valid and
Q: Who are the parties to a contract of
obligatory between the parties before its annulment.
guaranty?
Unenforceable contact, on the other hand, is one
which cannot be enforced by action or complaint in
court, unless they have been ratified by the party A:
who did not give his consent thereto. Since both are 1. Guarantor
considered valid obligations between the parties 2. Creditor
until their annulment, and subject to ratification,
they can be secured in a contract of guaranty. GUARANTOR
Q: What are the rights of a third person who 2. Creditors suing on a surety bond may
pays for the debt guaranteed or secured? recover from the surety, as part of their
damages, interest at the legal rate,
A: judicial cost and attorney’s fees when
1. If payment is made without the appropriate even if the surety would
knowledge or against the will of the thereby become liable to pay more than
debtor: the total amount stipulated in the bond
a. Guarantor can recover only insofar (Dino v. CA, G.R. No. 89775, Nov. 26,
as the payment has been beneficial 1995).
to the debtor
b. Guarantor cannot compel the 3. A penalty clause may also increase the
creditor to subrogate him in his liability of the surety (General Insurance
rights. Surety Co. v. Republic, G.R. No. L‐13873,
Jan. 31, 1963)
2. If payment is made with the knowledge
or consent of the debtor – Subrogated Q: What is the efect of guarantor’s death?
to all the rights which creditor had
against the debtor. A: His heirs are still liable to the extent of the
value of the inheritance because the obligation is
Q: What is the extent of guarantor’s liability? not purely personal and is therefore
transmissible.
A:
1. Where the guaranty is definite – It is Q: What is the efect of the debtor’s death?
limited in whole or in part to the
principal debt to the exclusion of A: His obligation will survive. His estate will be
accessories. answerable. If the estate has no sufficient assets,
the guarantor shall be liable.
2. Where the guaranty is indefinite or
simple – It shall comprise not only the Q: What is the rule with respect to jurisdiction in
principal obligation but also all its an action based on a contract of guaranty?
accessories, including the judicial costs
provided that the guarantor shall only A: The guarantor shall be subject to the
be liable for those cost incurred after he jurisdiction of the court of the place where the
has been judicially required to pay. obligation is to be complied with.
395
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
Fa cult ad d e Der e
cho C ivi l
BENEFIT OF EXCUSSION 1. Guarantor has expressly renounced it.
2. Guarantor has bound himself solidarily
Q: What is the benefit of excussion? with the Debtor.
3. Debtor is insolvent.
A: It is a right by which the guarantor cannot be 4. Guarantor has absconded, or cannot be
compelled to pay the creditor unless the latter has sued within the Philippines unless he
exhausted all the properties of the principal left a manager or representative.
debtor and has resorted to all legal remedies 5. If it may be presumed that an
against such debtor. execution
on the property of the Debtor cannot
Q: What are the requisites of benefit of satisfy the obligation.
exhaustion or excussion? 6. Guarantor does not invoke the benefit
against Creditor upon demand to him
A: for payment and he does not point out
The guarantor must set up the right of available property of the Debtor within
excussion against the creditor upon the the Philippines sufficient to cover the
latter’s demand for payment from him; obligation (Art. 2060, NCC).
and 7. Guarantor is a judicial bondsman or
sub‐surety.
He must point out to the creditor the 8. A pledge or mortgage of his own
available property of the debtor (not property has been given by Guarantor
exempted from execution) found as special security.
within the Philippine territory (Art. 9. Guarantor fails to interpose it as a
2060, NCC). defense before judgment is rendered.
A: RJS‐AIR‐FEDS
There is no payment
yet, but there is merely a claim payment of debt; the Q: What is the efect of compromise between
pressed against one or more co‐ paying co‐guarantor is the creditor and the guarantor to the principal
guarantors seeking the contribution debtor?
of the co‐guarantors
A: If compromise is beneficial to the principal
Q: What is the efect of the creditor’s negligence debtor, it is valid; otherwise, it is not binding
nd
in exhausting the properties of the debtor? upon him (2 sentence, Art. 2063, NCC). To be
binding, it must benefit both the guarantor and
A: He shall suffer the loss to the extent of the the debtor.
value of the pointed property which was not
exhausted by the creditor (Art. 2061, NCC). Q: What is the rule on the right of indemnity and
reimbursement of the guarantor who paid the
Note: The article applies when the guarantor has debt?
complied with the conditions of Art. 2060 (requisites
of benefit of excussion). A:
GR: Guarantor is entitled to be reimbursed by
Q: What is the rule with regard to action of the Debtor for:
creditor against the debtor? 1. total amount of the debt paid;
2. legal interest from the time payment
A: was made known to the debtor;
GR: Only the principal debtor should be sued 3. expenses incurred after notifying
alone. debtor that demand to pay was made
upon him; and
XPN: If the benefit of excussion is not 4. damages in accordance with law.
available, the guarantor can be sued jointly
with the debtor. XPNs:
1. Guaranty is constituted without the
Q: Is the guarantor entitled to be notified of the knowledge or against the will of the
complaint against the debtor? debtor.
Effect: Guarantor may only recover only
A: Yes. If the guarantor desires to set up defenses so much as was beneficial to the debtor.
as are granted him by law, he may have the
rd
opportunity to do so. 2. Payment by 3 persons who does not
intend to be reimbursed.
Q: What are the consequences of the Effect: deemed a donation and as such
guarantor’s appearance or non‐appearance in requires the consent of debtor.
the case against the debtor?
Q: What is the right of the guarantor afer the
A: payment of the debt is made to the creditor?
1. If he does not appear and judgment is
rendered against the debtor, he cannot A: Right of subrogation. The guarantor is
set up defenses which he could have set subrogated to all the rights which the creditor
st
up had he appeared; moreover, he had against the debtor (1 par., Art. 2067)
cannot question the decision anymore;
Q: What happens when guarantor pays without
2. If he appears such as by filing an answer notice to the debtor?
in intervention, he may lose or may win
the case. If he losses, he is still entitled A: The debtor may interpose against the
to the benefit of excussion. There is no guarantor defenses available to the debtor as
waiver of his benefit of excussion by his against the creditor at the time payment was
appearance in the case. made.
years;
6. If there are reasonable grounds to fear
that the principal debtor intends to
abscond; or
7. If the principal debtor is in imminent
danger of becoming insolvent.
A: A guaranty shall be construed as continuing
when by the terms thereof it is evident that the
Note: In all these cases, the cause of action of the object is to give a standing credit to the principal
guarantor is either to obtain release from the debtor to be used from time to time either
guaranty, or to demand a security that shall protect indefinitely or until a certain period, especially if
him from any proceedings by the creditor and from the right to recall the guaranty is expressly
the danger of insolvency of the debtor (Art. 2071, reserved (Dino v. CA, G.R. No. 89775, Nov. 26,
NCC). 1995)
Q: What is the remedy of a person who becomes Q: May guaranty secure future debts?
a guarantor at the request of another for the
debt of a third person who is not present? A: Yes. A guaranty may be given to secure even
future debts, the amount of which may not be
A: He has the option of suing either the principal known at the time the guaranty is executed. This
debtor or the requesting party (Art. 2072, NCC). is the basis for contracts denominated as
continuing guaranty or suretyship. It is one which
Note: The provision applies when the guarantor has covers all transactions, including those arising in
actually paid the debt. the future, which are within the description or
contemplation of the contract of guaranty, until
the expiration or termination thereof. (Dino v. CA,
G.R. No. 89775, Nov. 26, 1995)
Q: PAGRICO submitted a Surety Bond issued by D. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL BONDS
R&B Surety to secure an increase in its credit line
with PNB. For consideration of the Surety Bond, Q: What is a Bond?
Cochingyan and Villanueva entered into an
Indemnity Agreement with R&B Surety and A: A bond, when required by law, is commonly
bound themselves jointly and severally to the understood to mean an undertaking that is
terms and conditions of the Surety Bond. When sufficiently secured, and not cash or currency.
PAGRICO defaulted, PNB demanded payment to Whatever surety bonds are submitted are subject
R&B Surety; R&B Surety, in turn, demanded to any objections as to their sufficiency or as to
payment to Cochingyan and Villanueva. R&B the solvency of the bondsman.
sued them. Villanueva argued that the complaint
was premature because PNB had not yet Q: What is a Bondsman?
proceeded against R&B Surety to enforce the
latter's liability under the Surety Bond. Is the A: A bondsman is a surety offered in virtue of a
contention correct? provision of law or a judicial order. He must have
the qualifications required of a guarantor and in
A: No. Indemnity Agreements are contracts of special laws like the Rules of Court.
indemnification not only against actual loss but
against liability as well. While in a contract of Q: What are the qualifications to a property
indemnity against loss an indemnitor will not be bond?
liable until the person to be indemnified makes
payment or sustains loss, in a contract of A: The necessary qualifications of sureties to a
indemnity against liability, as in this case, the property bond shall be as follows:
indemnitor's liability arises as soon as the liability 1. Each of them must be a resident owner
of the person to be indemnified has arisen without of real estate with in the Philippines;
regard to whether or not he has suffered actual 2. Where there is only one surety, his real
loss. Accordingly, R & B Surety was entitled to estate must be worth at least the
proceed against petitioners not only for the amount of the undertaking;
partial payments already made but for the full 3. In case there are two or more sureties,
amount owed by PAGRICO to the PNB. they may justify severally in amounts
(Cochingyan, Jr. v. R&B Surety and Ins. lass than that expressed in the
Co.,GR.No.L‐47369, June 30, 1987) undertaking, if the entire sum justified
to is equivalent to the whole amount of
bail demanded. (Sec. 12, Rule 114,
C. EXTINGUISHMENT OF GUARANTY Rules of Court)
Q: What are the grounds for extinguishing a Q: What is the nature of a bond?
contract of guaranty?
A: All bonds including “judicial bonds” are
A: contractual in nature.
1. Principal obligation is extinguished
2. Same causes as all other obligations
3. If creditor voluntarily accepts
immovable or other properties in Q: What is a Judicial Bond?
payment of the debt (even if he should
afterwards lose the same through eviction A: Judicial bonds constitute merely as a special
or conveyance of property) class of contracts of guaranty, characterized by
4. Release in favor of one of the the fact that they are given in virtue of a judicial
guarantors, w/o consent of the others, order.
benefits all to the extent of the share of
the guarantor to whom it has been Q: Is the right of excussion available to a
granted bondsman?
5. Extension granted to debtor by creditor
without consent of guarantor A: No. A judicial bondsman and the sub‐surety are
6. When by some act of the creditor, the not entitled to the benefit of excussion because
guarantors even though they are they are not mere guarantors, but sureties whose
solidarily liable cannot be subrogated to liabilities is primary and solidary. (ART 2084, NCC)
the rights, mortgages, and preferences
of the former
Q: What is the liability of the surety if the Q: What is the efect of a surety bond filed for an
creditor was negligent in collecting the debt? alien staying in the country which is forfeited for
violating its terms?
A: A surety is still liable even if the creditor was
negligent in collecting from the debtor. The A: The effect of the violation is that its
contract of suretyship is not that the oblige will subsequent unauthorized cancellation thru
see that the principal pays the debt or fulfills the mistake or fraud does not relieve the surety. A
contract, but that the surety will see that the bond surrendered thru mistake or fraud may,
principal pay or perform(PNB v. Manila Surety & therefore, be considered as a valid and subsisting
Fidelity Co., Inc., 14 SCRA 776, 1965) instrument. (Far Eastern Surety and Ins. Co., v. CA,
GR No. L‐12019, Oct 16, 1958)
Q: What is the efect of violation by the creditor
of the terms of the surety agreement? Q: What is the rule when the performance of a
bond is rendered impossible?
A: A violation by the creditor of the terms of the
surety entitles the surety to be released A: It is the surety’s duty to inform the court of the
therefrom. (Associated Ins. & Surety Co. v. happening of the event so that it may take action
Bacolod Murcia Milling Co., GR. No. L‐12334, May or decree in the discharge of the surety when the
22, 1959) performance of the bond is rendered impossible
by an act of God, or the obligee, or the law.
(People v. Otiak Omal & Luzon Co., Inc., GR. No. L‐
14457, June 30, 1961)
A:
Definiton
delivers to the creditor or a third person a movable or personal property, or document evidencing incorporeal rights, to secure the fulfill
Q: What are the similarities of pledge and Q: Are the contracts of pledge, mortgage or
mortgage? antichresis indivisible?
A: A:
1. Both are accessory contracts; GR: A pledge, mortgage or antichresis is
2. Both pledgor and mortgagor must be indivisible.
the absolute owner of the property;
3. Both pledgor and mortgagor must have Note: Indivisibility may be waived. Indivisibility
the free disposal of their property or be only applies to the contracting parties.
authorized to do so; and
4. In both, the thing proffered as security XPNs:
may be sold at public auction, when the 1. Where each one of several things
principal obligation becomes due and guarantees determinate portion of the
no payment is made by the debtor. credit
401
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
Fa cult ad d e Der e
cho C ivi l
Q: What are the elements of pactum grant of authority to the bank to sell the
commissorium? leasehold rights in case of default is proof that no
such ownership was transferred and that a mere
A: encumbrance was constituted. There would have
1. There is a pledge, mortgage or been no need for such authority had there been a
antichresis of a property by way of cession.
security; and
2. There is an express stipulation for the No, the clause in question is not a pactum
automatic appropriation by the creditor commissorium. It is pactum commissorium when
of the property in case of non‐payment default in the payment of the loan automatically
vests ownership of the encumbered property in
Note: What are prohibited are those stipulations the bank. In the problem given, the bank does not
executed or made simultaneously with the original automatically become owner of the property
contract, and not those subsequently entered into. upon default of the mortgagor. The bank has to
sell the property and apply the proceeds to the
Q: ABC loaned to MNO P40,000 for which the indebtedness. (2001 Bar Question)
latter pledged 400 shares of stock in XYZ Inc. It
was agreed that if the pledgor failed to pay the Q: X borrowed money from Y and gave a piece of
loan with 10% yearly interest within four years, land as security by way of mortgage. It was
the pledgee is authorized to foreclose on the expressly agreed between the parties in the
shares of stock. As required, MNO delivered mortgage contract that upon nonpayment of the
possession of the shares to ABC with the debt on time by X, the mortgaged land would
understanding that the shares would be already belong to Y. If X defaulted in paying,
returned to MNO upon the payment of the loan. would Y now become the owner of the
However, the loan was not paid on time. A mortgaged land? Why?
month afer 4 years, may the shares of stock
pledged be deemed owned by ABC or not? A: No, Y would not become the owner of the
Reason. land. The stipulation is in the nature of pactum
commissorium which is prohibited by law. The
A: The shares of stock cannot be deemed owned property should be sold at public auction and the
by ABC upon default of MNO. They have to be proceeds thereof applied to the indebtedness.
foreclosed. Under Article 2088, NCC, the creditor Any excess shall be given to the mortgagor.
cannot appropriate the things given by way of
pledge. And even if the parties have stipulated Q: Suppose in the preceding question, the
that ABC becomes the owner of the shares in case agreement between X and Y was that if X failed
MNO defaults on the loan, such stipulation is void to pay the mortgage debt on time, the debt shall
for being a pactum commissorium. (2004 Bar be paid with the land mortgaged by X to Y.
Question) Would your answer be the same as in the
preceding question? Explain.
Q: To secure a loan obtained from a rural bank,
Purita assigned her leasehold rights over a stall A: No, the answer would not be the same. This is
in the public market in favor of the bank. The a valid stipulation and does not constitute pactum
deed of assignment provides that in case of commissorium. In pactum commissorium, the
default in the payment of the loan, the bank acquisition is automatic without need of any
shall have the right to sell Purita's rights over the further action. In the instant problem another act
market stall as her attorney‐in‐fact, and to apply is required to be performed, namely, the
the proceeds to the payment of the loan. conveyance of the property as payment (dacion
en pago). (1999 Bar Question)
Was the assignment of leasehold rights a
mortgage or a cession? Why? Q: In order to secure a bank loan, XYZ
Assuming the assignment to be a mortgage, does Corporation surrendered its deposit certificate,
the provision giving the bank the power to sell with a maturity date of September 1, 1997 to the
Purita's rights constitute pactum commissorium bank. The corporation defaulted on the due
or not? Why? repayment of the loan, prompting the bank to
encash the deposit certificate. XYZ Corporation
A: questioned the above action taken by the bank
The assignment was a mortgage, not a cession, of as being a case of pactum commissorium. The
the leasehold rights. A cession would have bank disagrees. What is your opinion?
transferred ownership to the bank. However, the
A: I submit that there is no pactum commissorium Note: A thing lawfully pledged to one creditor,
st
here. Deposits of money in banks and similar cannot be pledged to another as long as the 1
institutions are governed by the provisions of pledge subsists.
simple loans (Art. 1980, NCC). The relationship
between the depositor and a bank is one of C. ESSENTIAL REQUISITES
creditor and debtor. Basically, this is a matter of
compensation as all the elements of Q: What are the essential requisites for a
compensation are present in this case. (BPI v. CA, contract of pledge?
G.R. No. 104612, May 10, 1994) (1997 Bar
Question) A:
1. Constituted to secure the fulfillment of
Q: Spouses Uy Tong purchased seven motor a principal obligation;
vehicles from Bayanihan Investment payable in 2. Pledgor is the absolute owner of the
installments. It was agreed that if the spouses thing pledged;
should fail to pay their obligation, Bayanihan will 3. Persons constituting the pledge have
automatically be the owner of the apartment the free disposal of their property, and
which the spouses has a leasehold right. The in the absence thereof, that they be
spouses afer paying the downpayment, failed to legally authorized for the purpose. (Art.
pay the balance, hence, Bayanihan filed an 2085, NCC)
action for specific performance against the
spouses. The judgment provided that in case the Note: A contract of pledge not appearing in a public
spouses failed to pay the obligation within 30 instrument does not affect its validity. It is valid
days from notice, they are to execute a Deed of between the parties.
Absolute Sale over the apartment and/or
leasehold rights. Is the stipulation a pactum Q: What kind of possession is required in
commissorium? pledge?
A: No. The questioned agreement evinces no A: The mere taking of the property is not enough.
basis for the application of pactum There must be continuous possession of the
commissorium. There is no contract of pledge or thing. However, the pledgee is allowed to
mortgage entered into by the parties. Bayanihan temporarily entrust the physical possession of the
sought the intervention of the court by filing an thing pledged to the pledgor without invalidating
action for specific performance. Hence there was the contract. But here, the pledgor would be in
no automatic appropriation of the property. (Uy possession as a mere trustee and his possession is
Tong v. CA, G.R. No. 77465, May 21, 1988) subject to the order of the pledgee.
A: No. A property already pledged cannot be 3. Apply the fruits, income, dividends, or
pledged while the first pledge is subsisting interests produced or earned by the
(Mission de San Vicente v. Reyes, No. 5508, Aug. property, to interests or expenses first,
14, 1911). then to the principal. (Art. 2102, NCC)
Q: Can incorporeal rights evidenced by proper 4. GR: Cannot use the thing pledged
document be pledged? without authority.
Q: Does the debtor continue to be the owner of A: The pledge shall be extinguished. Any
the thing in case the same is expropriated by the stipulation to the contrary shall be void (Art.
State? 2110, NCC).
A: No. Ownership is transferred to the Q: What is the presumption when the thing is
expropriating authority. found in the possession of the pledgor
subsequent to the perfection of the pledge?
Note: The creditor may bring actions pertaining to
the owner of the thing pledged in order to recover it A: There is prima facie presumption that the thing
from, or defend it against a third person (Art. 2103, pledged has been returned by the pledgee to the
NCC). pledgor or owner, in any of the following
circumstances:
Q: Can the debtor ask for the return of the thing
pledged against the will of the creditor? 1. If the thing is found in the possession of
the pledgor or owner after the pledge
A: had been perfected; or
GR: No. 2. If the thing is found in the possession of
a third person who received it from the
XPNs: pledgor or owner after the perfection of
1. If the debtor has paid the debt and its nd
the pledge (2 par., Art. 2110, NCC).
interest, with expenses in a proper case
(Art. 2105, NCC). Note: It is presumed that the accessory obligation of
2. If the thing is in danger of destruction pledge has been remitted when the thing pledged,
or impairment provided, the pledgor after its delivery to the creditor, is found in the
offers an acceptable substitute for it possession of the debtor, or of a third person who
which is of the same kind and not of owns the thing (Art. 1274, NCC).
inferior quality and without prejudice to
the application of Art. 2108 whenever Q: What is the requisite for the renunciation or
warranted. abandonment of the pledge by the pledgee?
Q: Can the pledgee cause the sale of the thing A: There must be a statement in writing to that
st
pledged in public auction where the obligation is effect (1 sentence, Art. 2111, NCC).
not yet due?
Note: The renunciation of the pledge is not contrary
to law, public order, public policy, morals or good
A: Yes, if without the fault of the pledge, there is
customs. Further, Art. 1356 of the NCC, which speaks
danger of destruction, impairment or diminution
of the form of contracts, must be complied with.
in value of the thing pledged. The proceeds of the
auction shall be security for the principal
Q: Is acceptance or return of the thing necessary
obligation in the same manner as the thing
for the validity of the renunciation under Art.
originally pledged (Art. 2108, NCC).
2111?
Q: What are the rights of the creditor who is
A: No. it is not a case of donation where
deceived on the substance or quality of the thing
acceptance is necessary to make the donation
pledged?
valid.
A: To demand:
Q: Suppose the thing was not returned, is there
1. from the pledgor an acceptable
extinction of the pledge?
substitute of the thing; or
2. the immediate payment of the principal
A: Yes. Even if the thing was not returned, as long
obligation (Art. 2109, NCC).
as there is an effective renunciation,
Q: What is the right of the pledgee when the Q: May a third person pay the pledgor’s debt?
debt has not been satisfied in due time?
A: Yes, if he has any interest in the fulfillment of
A: The pledgee has the right to proceed with the the principal obligation (Art. 2117, NCC).
sale of the thing at a public auction to raise funds
for payment of the obligation (Art. 2112, NCC). Q: What is the rule when what has been pledged
is a “credit”?
Q: What are the requisites of public sale?
A: The pledgee may collect and receive the
A: amount due. He shall apply the same to the
1. The obligation must be due and unpaid; payment of his claim, and deliver the surplus,
2. The sale of the thing must be at a public should there be any, to the pledgor (Art. 2118,
auction; NCC).
3. There must be notice to the pledgor
and owner stating the amount for Q: Santos made time deposits with OBM. IRC,
which the sale is to be held; and through its president Santos, applied for a loan
4. The sale must be conducted by a Notary with PNB. To secure the loan, Santos executed a
Public. Deed of Assignment of the time deposits in favor
of PNB. When PNB tried to collect from OBM,
Q: What is deed of acquittance? the latter did not pay the CTDs. PNB then
demanded payment from Santos and IRC, but
A: It is a document of the release or discharge of the latter refused payment alleging that the
the pledgor from the entire obligation including obligation was deemed paid with the irrevocable
interests and expenses. This shall be executed by assignment of the CTDs.
the pledgee after appropriating the thing in case a
no sale was made in a second auction. Is the liability of IRC deemed paid by virtue
of the deed of assignment?
Q: May the pledgor participate in the public Is OBM liable for damages
auction? A:
1. No. For all intents and purposes, the
A: Yes. Moreover, he shall have a better right if he deed of assignment in this case is
offers the same terms as the highest bidder [Art. actually a pledge. Where a CTD in a
2113 (1), NCC]. bank, payable at a future time, was
handed over by a debtor to his creditor,
Q: Who can bid in the public auction? it was not payment, unless there was an
express agreement on the part of the
A: creditor to receive it as such.
1. The public 2. Yes. While it is true that no interest
2. Pledgor/owner/debtor – shall be shall be due unless it has been expressly
preferred if same terms as the highest stipulated in writing, this applies only to
bidder is offered interest for the use of money. It does
3. Pledgee/creditor – he must not be the not comprehend interest paid as
only one bidder, otherwise, his bid is damages. Santos has the right to
invalid and void recover damages resulting from the
default of OBM and the measure of
Q: Can checks be accepted as payment as such damages is interest at the legal
purchase price in a public sale? rate of 6% per annum on the amounts
due and unpaid at the expiration of the
A: No, they are not legal tenders. (CFI v. CA, No. L‐ periods respectively provided in the
4191, April 30, 1952). contracts. (Integrated Realty Corp. v.
PNB, G.R. No. 60705, June 28, 1989)
Q: What is the rule when two or more things are 2. No fault on the part of the pledge
pledged? 3. Pledgor is offering in place of the thing,
another thing in pledge which is of the
A: The pledgee may choose which he will cause to same kind and quality as the former;
be sold, unless there is a stipulation to the and
st
contrary (1 sentence, Art. 2119, NCC). 4. Pledgee does not choose to exercise his
right to cause the thing pledged to be
Q: What is the restriction on the right of the sold at public auction (Art. 2107, NCC)
st
pledgee under the 1 sentence of Art. 2119?
F. PERFECTION
A: He may only demand the sale of only as many
of the things as are necessary for the payment of Q: How is a contract of pledge perfected?
nd
the debt (2 sentence, Art. 2119, NCC).
A: A contract of pledge is perfected when the
E. RIGHTS OF PLEDGOR thing pledged is placed in the actual possession of
or delivered to the pledgee or a third person
Q: What are the rights of the pledgor? designated by the parties by common consent.
(Art. 2093, NCC)
A:
1. Right to dispose the thing pledged, Note: If Art. 2093 is not complied with, the pledge
provided there is consent of the is void.
pledgee (Art. 2097, NCC)
2. Right to ask that the thing pledged be Q: Four carabaos were pledged by T to E. T is the
deposited (Art. 2104 and Art. 2106, registered owner of the carabaos. The carabaos
NCC) were actually in the possession of J. E never took
3. Right to substitute thing pledged (Art. possession of the carabaos. There is nothing in
2107, NCC) the contract which stated that J was by common
consent made the depositary of the carabaos in
Q: When may the owner ask that the thing E’s behalf. Is there a lawfully constituted pledge?
pledged be deposited judicially or
extrajudicially? A: None. The delivery of possession of the
property pledged requires actual possession and
A: a mere symbolic delivery is not sufficient. (Betita
1. If the creditor uses the thing without v Ganzon, 49 Phil. 87)
authority
2. If he misuses the the thing in any other Q: What is the efect when possession or
way; or delivery of the thing pledged was not made?
3. If the thing is in danger of being lost or
impaired because of the negligence or A: An agreement to constitute a pledge only gives
willful act of the pledge (Art. 2106, NCC) rise to a personal action between the contracting
parties. Unless the movable given as a security by
Q: Does the pledgor have the right to demand way of pledge be delivered to and placed in the
the return of the thing pledged against the will possession of the creditor or of a third person
of the creditor? designated by common agreement, the creditor
acquires no right to the property because pledge
A: No. He cannot ask for its return until the
is merely a lien and possession is indispensable to
obligation is fully paid including interest due
the right of a lien.
thereon and expenses incurred for its
preservation (Art. 2105, NCC) Q: What is the efect if the pledgee fails to take
the property pledged into his possession?
Q: What are the requisites before the pledgor
may substitute the thing pledged with another A: If a pledgee fails or neglects to take the
thing? property pledged into his possession, he is
presumed to have waived the right granted him
A: by the contract. (U.S. v. Terrel, 2 Phil. 222)
1. Pledgor has reasonable grounds to fear
the destruction or impairment of the
thing pledged;
Q: What are the requisites to bind third persons A: When there is no payment of the debt on time,
in a contract of pledge? the object of the pledge may be alienated for the
purpose of satisfying the claims of the pledgee.
A: To bind third persons, the pledge must be
embodied in a public instrument where the Q: What is the procedure for the public sale of a
following entries must appear ‐ thing pledged?
A description of the thing pledged; and
Statement of date when the pledge was A:
executed. (Art. 2096, NCC) 1. The obligation must be due and unpaid
2. The sale of the thing pledged must be at
Q: A is indebted to B. A pledges his diamond ring public auction
to B. The ring is delivered to B, but in the public 3. There must be notice to the pledgor
instrument executed, there is no description of and owner, stating the amount for
the ring, and the date of the pledge does not which the sale is to be held
appear. If A sells the ring to C, does C have to 4. The sale must be conducted by Notary
respect the pledge in favor of B? Public.
A: No. C does not have to respect the pledge H. PLEDGE BY OPERATION OF LAW
since as to him, the pledge is not effective and
valid. Q: What is a pledge created by operation of law?
Q: What is the reason behind the requisites? A: Pledge by operation of law or Legal Pledges are
those constituted or created by operation of law.
A: The purpose of the requirements is to forestall This refers to the right of retention.
fraud, because a debtor may attempt to conceal
his property from his creditors when he sees it in Q: What rules apply to legal pledge?
danger of execution by simulating a pledge
thereof with an accomplice. (Tec Bi & Co. v. A:
Chartered Bank of India, 41 Phil. 576) 1. The rules governing conventional
pledge applies.
Q: What is the efect if no public instrument is 2. There is no definite period for the
made? payment of the principal obligation. The
pledge must, therefore, make a demand
A: When the contract of pledge is not recorded in a public for the payment of the amount due
instrument, it is void as against third persons; the buyer of the him. Without such demand, he cannot
thing pledged is a third person. The fact that the person exercise the right of sale at public
claiming as pledgee has taken actual physical possession of auction. (De Leon)
the thing sold will not prevent the pledge from being declared
void insofar as the innocent stranger is concerned. (Tec Bi & Q: What are the instances of legal pledges where
Co. v. Chartered there is right of retention?
Bank of India, Australia and China, 16 O.G. 908; Ocejo, Perez and Co. v. International Bank, 37
Phil. 631)
G. FORECLOSURE
Note: there is only one public auction here. Q: Distinguish contract of pledge from chattel
(Paras) mortgage.
A: Recovery of deficiency
1. Extinguish the principal obligation even
if the proceeds of the sale do not satisfy
the whole amount of the obligation.
2. If proceeds from the sale exceed the
amount due, the debtor is not entitled
to the excess, the excess goes to the
pledgee. This is to compensate him for
the eventuality where the purchase Possession
price is lesser than the amount of the
debt, wherein he cannot receive any
deficiency unless there is a contrary Contract
agreement or in case of legal pledge, Formal contract
the pledgor is entitled to the excess Recording in a public instrument
3. If the proceeds of the sale is less than
the amount due, the creditor has no
right to recover the deficiency and the
pledgor is not liable for the deficiency
409
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
Q: Distinguish contract of pledge from real 1. It covers only immovable property and
estate mortgage. alienable real rights imposed upon
immovables
A: 2. It must appear in a public instrument
3. Registration in the registry of property
rd
is necessary to bind 3 persons
Real contract
Subject matter is Q: What are the kinds of real mortgages?
personal property
A:
1. Conventional mortgages – constituted
voluntarily by the contracting parties.
2. Legal mortgage – required by law.
3. Equitable mortgage – intention of the
parties is to make the immovable as a
security for the performance of the
obligation but the formalities of a real
mortgage are not complied with.
A:
REAL ESTATE
MORTGAGE
Accessory contract
V. REAL MORTGAGE
A:
Q: What are the things that are deemed included instrument the intent to secure future and other
in the mortgage? indebtedness can be gathered. A mortgage given
to secure advancement is a continuing security
A: and is not discharged by repayment of the
1. Natural accessions amount named in the mortgage, until the full
2. Improvements amount of the advancements is paid (Mojica v.
3. Growing fruits CA, G.R. No. 94247, Sept. 11, 1991).
4. Rents
5. Income Q: May a mortgage credit be alienated or
6. Insurance proceeds assigned to a third person?
7. Expropriation price (Art. 2127, NCC)
A: Yes, in whole or in part, with the formalities
Q: When does the mortgage lien attach in case required by law (Art. 2128, NCC).
of new or future improvements?
Q: What are the requisites to be followed for
A: On the date of the registration of the mortgage assignment of credit?
(Luzon Lumber and Hardware Co., Inc, v.
Quiambao, G.R. No. L‐5638, Mar. 20, 1954). A: An assignment of a credit, right or action shall
produce no effect as against third persons, unless
Q: What is dragnet clause? it appears in a public instrument, or the
instrument is recorded in the Registry of Property
A: It is a mortgage provision which is specifically in case the assignment involves real property (Art.
phrased to subsume all debts of past or future 1625, NCC).
origin. Such clauses are “carefully scrutinized and
strictly construed”. The mortgage contract is also Q: May the creditor claim from the third person
one of adhesion (Philippine Bank of in possession of the property payment of the
Communications v. CA, G.R. No. 118552, Feb. 5, credit?
1996).
A: Yes, up to the extent secured by the property
Q: Is the amount stated in the contract which the third party possesses, in terms and
controlling in case of mortgage securing future with the formalities which the law establishes
advancements? (Art. 2129, NCC).
A: No. The amount named in the contract does Q: Is a stipulation forbidding the owner from
not limit the amount for which the mortgage alienating the immovable mortgaged valid?
stand as a security, if, from the four corners of the
instrument the intent to secure future and other A: No. The prohibition to alienate is contrary to
indebtedness can be gathered. public good inasmuch as the transmission of
property should not be unduly impeded (Report,
Q: Petitioner obtained a loan of P20K from Code Commission, p. 58).
defendant Rural Bank of Kawit. The loan was
secured by a REM over a parcel of land. The Q: What are the laws that govern contract of
mortgage contract states that the mortgage will real mortgage?
cover the payment of the loan of P20K and such
other loans or other advances already obtained A:
or to be obtained by the mortgagors from the 1. New Civil Code
bank. The loan of P20k was fully paid. Thereafer 2. Mortgage Law
they again obtained a loan of P18K, secured by 3. Property Registration Decree (PD 1529)
the same mortgage. The spouses defaulted. The 4. Sec. 194, as amended by Act No. 3344,
bank extra judicially foreclosed the mortgage. Revised Administrative Code (Phil. Bank
Was the foreclosure sale valid? of Commerce v. De Vera, G.R. No. L‐
18816, Dec. 29, 1962)
A: Yes. It has long been settled that mortgages 5. R.A. 4882 – law governing aliens who
given to secure future advancements are valid become mortgagees.
and legal contracts; that the amounts named as
consideration in said contract do not limit the
amount for which the mortgage may stand as
security, if from the four corners of the
A: By filing a petition with the office of the sheriff. Q: May a mortgagor enjoin the implementation
It may also be initiated through a Notary Public of a writ of possession on the ground that there
commissioned in the place where the property is is a pending case for annulment of the
situated. extrajudicial foreclosure of the REM?
Note: Notice containing the place and date is A: No. As a rule, any question regarding the
required before an auction sale is made in validity of the mortgage or its foreclosure cannot
extrajudicial foreclosure. (Sec. 3, Act No. 3135) be a legal ground for refusing the issuance of a
writ of possession. Regardless of whether or not
Q: What governs extrajudicial foreclosure by there is a pending suit for annulment of the
PNB? mortgage or the foreclosure itself, the purchaser
is entitled to a writ of possession, without
A: The same shall be governed by Sections 29, 30 prejudice to the outcome of the case. Hence, an
and 34 of Act No. 3135 and not by the PNB injunction to prohibit the issuance of writ of
Charter (PNB v. CA, G.R. No. 60208, December 5, possession is entirely out of place. Prohibition
1985). does not lie to enjoin the implementation of a
writ of possession. Once the writ of possession
Q: What are the requisites of notice of sherif’s has been issued, the trial court has no alternative
sale? but to enforce the writ without delay. (Sps. Ong v.
CA, G.R. No. 121494, June 8, 2000)
A: It must contain the correct number of the Q: Can the mortgagee recover the deficiency?
certificate of title and the correct technical
description of the real property to be sold (San A: If there be a balance due to the mortgagee
Jose v. CA, GR No. 106953, Aug. 19, 1993). after applying the proceeds of the sale, the
mortgagee is entitled to recover the deficiency
Q: What is the purpose of notice of sale? (DBP v. Mirang, G.R. No. L‐29130, Aug. 8, 1975).
A: To inform the public of the nature and Note: In judicial foreclosure, the Rules of Court
condition of the property sold, and of the time, specifically gives the mortgagee the right to claim for
place and terms of the sale. deficiency in case a deficiency exists (Sec. 6, Rule 70).
Q: MBTC granted a loan to spouses Peñafiel, While Act No. 3135 governing extrajudicial
who mortgaged their two (2) parcels of land in foreclosures of mortgage does not give a mortgagee
Mandaluyong. The spouses defaulted in the the right to recover deficiency after the public
payment. MBTC instituted an extrajudicial auction sale, neither does it expressly or impliedly
foreclosure proceeding under Act No. 3135. The prohibit such recovery.
Notice of Sale was published in Maharlika
Pilipinas, which has no business permit in This right to recover deficiency had been
Mandaluyong and its list of subscribers shows categorically resolved in State Investment v. CA (G.R.
that there were no subscribers from No. 101163, January 11, 1993). Thus, the mortgagee
Mandaluyong. Did MBTC comply with the is entitled to recover the deficiency in case the sale
proceeds are not sufficient to cover the debt in
publication requirement under Section 3, Act
extrajudicial foreclosures.
No. 3135?
The action to recover a deficiency after foreclosure
A: No. Maharlika Pilipinas is not a newspaper of prescribes after ten (10) years from the time the
general circulation in Mandaluyong where the right of action accrues as provided in Article 1144(2),
property is located. To be a newspaper of general NCC (DBP v. Tomeldan, G.R. No. 51269, Nov. 17,
circulation, it is enough that it is published for the 1980).
dissemination of local news and general
information, that it has a bona fide subscription
list of paying subscribers, and that it is published
at regular intervals. The newspaper must be
Q: What is stipulation of upset price? Registration may be granted in the name of the
mortgagee but subject to the subordinate lien
A: It is a stipulation of minimum price at which holders’ equity of redemption, which should be
the property shall be sold to become operative in exercised within ninety (90) days from the date
the event of a foreclosure sale at public auction. It the decision becomes final. This registration is
is null and void. merely a necessary consequence of the execution
of the final deed of sale in the foreclosure
REDEMPTION proceedings. (Looyuko v. CA, G.R. No. 102696,
July 12, 2001)
Q: What is redemption?
Q: What are the requisites for valid right of
A: Transaction by which the mortgagor reacquires redemption?
or buys back the property which may have passed
under the mortgage or divests the property of the A:
lien which the mortgage may have created. 1. Must be made within one year from the
time of the registration of the sale.
Q: What are the kinds of redemption? 2. Payment of the purchase price of the
property plus 1% interest per month
A: together with the taxes thereon, if any,
1. Equity of redemption – right of paid by the purchaser with the same
mortgagor to redeem the mortgaged rate of interest computed from the date
property after his default in the of registration of the sale; and
performance of the conditions of the 3. Written notice of the redemption must
mortgage but before the sale of the be served on the officer who made the
mortgaged property or confirmation of sale and a duplicate filed with the
sale. It applies in case of judicial proper Register of Deeds (Rosales v.
foreclosure. Yboa, G.R. No. L‐42282, Feb. 28, 1983).
2. Right of redemption – right of the
mortgagor to redeem the mortgaged Note: The redemptioner should make an actual
property within one year from the date tender in good faith of the full amount of the
of registration of the certificate of sale. purchase price as provided above, i.e., the amount
It applies in case of extrajudicial fixed by the court in the order of execution or the
foreclosure. amount due under the mortgage deed, as the case
may be, with interest thereon at the rate specified in
Q: X and Y, judgment creditors of A, obtained the mortgage, and all the costs, and judicial and
other expenses incurred by the bank or institution
the transfer of the title of the mortgaged
concerned by reason of the execution and sale and
property in their names. Earlier, A executed a
as a result of the custody of said property less the
mortgage over the same property in favor of
income received from the property. (Heirs of
FGU Insurance. The latter mortgage was Quisimbing v. PNB, G.R. No. 178242, Jan. 20, 2009)
registered. When A defaulted, FGU foreclosed
the property. A certificate of sale was thereafer Q: Is the period of redemption a prescriptive
issued in FGU’s favor, which was confirmed by period?
the RTC. However, before the new TCT could be
issued, X and Y filed their respective motion for A: No. The period of redemption is not a
intervention and to set aside the judgment prescriptive period but a condition precedent
alleging that they are the new owners of the provided by law to restrict the right of the person
property and the failure of FGU to implead X and exercising redemption.
Y in the action for foreclosure deprived the latter
of due process. Is the contention of X and Y If a person exercising the right of redemption has
correct? offered to redeem the property within the period
fixed, he is considered to have complied with the
A: No. Subordinate lien holders acquire only a lien condition precedent prescribed by law and may
upon the equity of redemption vested in the thereafter bring an action to enforce
mortgagor, and their rights are strictly redemption.
subordinate to the superior lien of the
mortgagee. Such equity of redemption does not If, on the other hand, the period is allowed to
constitute a bar to the registration of the lapse before the right of redemption is exercised,
property in the name of the mortgagee. then the action to enforce redemption will not
prosper, even if the action is brought within the A: In foreclosure proceedings, the buyer becomes
ordinary prescriptive period. the absolute owner of the property purchased if it
is not redeemed during the prescribed period of
Q: D obtained a loan from C secured by a REM redemption, which is one year from the date of
over a parcel of land. When D defaulted, C registration of the sale. The Sheriff’s certificate of
extrajudicially foreclosed the property. C was sale was annotated in the certificate of titles on
declared the highest bidder in the auction. On April 30, 1976. DBP became the absolute owner
October 29, 1993, C caused the registration of of the properties on May 1, 1977. Thus, the
the certificate of sale. On November 9, 1994 D period to be considered in determining the
filed a complaint for annulment of the amount of collection should start from May 1,
extrajudicial foreclosure and auction sale. Can D 1997 up to the time when the possession of the
redeem the property beyond the one year properties are actually and completely
redemption period? surrendered to DBP. (La Campana Development
Corporation v. DBP, G.R. No. 146157, Feb. 13,
A: No. D lost any right or interest over the subject 2009)
property primarily because of his failure to
redeem the same in the manner and within the
period prescribed by law. His belated attempt to
question the legality and validity of the
foreclosure proceedings and public auction must
accordingly fail. (Sps. Landrito v. CA G.R. No.
133079, Aug. 9, 2005)
Q: Can a mortgagor, whose property has been
extrajudicially foreclosed and sold, validly
execute a mortgage contract over the same
property in favor of a third party during the
period of redemption?
Foreclosure sale
Petition for writ of possession if after the expiration of the redemption period,
the petition for writ of possession is mandatory or
ministerial
Note:
XPN: If the mortgagee is a bank or credit institution, there is one year right of redemption.
417
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
VI. CHATTEL MORTGAGE Q: What are the laws that govern chattel
mortgages?
A. DEFINITION AND CHARACTERISTICS A:
1. Chattel Mortgage Law (Act No. 1508)
Q: What is chattel mortgage? 2. Provisions of the Civil Code on pledge
A: It is a contract by virtue of which personal Note: In case of conflict between nos. 1 and
property is recorded in the Chattel Mortgage 2, the former shall prevail.
Register as a security for the performance of an
Revised Administrative Code
3.
obligation.
4.
Revised Penal Code (Art. 319)
5.
Other special laws (i.e. Motor vehicle
Q: What are the characteristics of chattel
law)
mortgage?
6. Ship Mortgage Decree of 1978 (P.D. No.
1521)
A:
Q: What may be the subject matter of chattel
1. It is a formal contract because it must
mortgage?
be embodied in a public instrument and
recorded in the Chattel Mortgage
A:
Register;
1. Shares of stock in a corporation;
2. Interest in business;
2. It is an accessory contract because its
3. Machinery and house of mixed
existence depends upon an existing
materials treated by parties as personal
valid principal obligation;
property and no innocent third person
will be prejudiced thereby (Makati
3. It is a unilateral contract because the
Leasing and Finance Corp. v. Weaver
obligation is only on the part of the
Textile Mills, Inc., No. L‐58469, May, 16,
creditor to free the chattel from
1983);
encumbrance upon the payment of the
4. Vessels, the mortgage of which have
principal obligation;
been recorded with the Philippine Coast
Guard in order to be effective as to
4. It does not convey dominion but is only third persons;
a security (In re: Du Tec Chuan, No. 5. Motor vehicles, the mortgage of which
11156, March 28, 1916); had been registered both with the Land
Transportation Commission and the
5. It creates a real right or a lien which is Chattel Mortgage Registry in order to
being recorded and follows the chattel affect third persons;
wherever it goes (Northern Motors, Inc. 6. House which is intended to be
v. Coquia, No. L‐40018, Dec. 15, 1975). demolished; or
7. Growing crops and large cattle (pars. 2
Q: What are the requisites in a chattel and 3, Sec. 7, Act No. 1508).
mortgage?
Note: Section 7 of the Chattel Mortgage Law does
A: not demand specific description of every chattel
1. GR: It covers only movable property mortgaged in the deed of mortgage, but only
requires that the description of the mortgaged
XPN: When the parties treat as property be such as to enable the parties to the
personalty that which is according to its mortgage or any other person to identify the same
after a reasonable investigation and inquiry (Saldana
nature realty.
v. Phil. Guaranty Co., Inc., No. L‐13194, Jan. 29,
1960); otherwise, the mortgage is invalid.
2. Registration with the Chattel Mortgage
Register.
3. Description of the property. Q: What is affidavit of good faith?
4. Accompanied by an affidavit of good
rd
faith to bind 3 persons. A: It is an oath in a contract of chattel mortgage
wherein the parties “severally swear that the
Note: The absence of an affidavit of good faith does mortgage is made for the purpose of securing the
not affect the validity of the contract. obligation specified in the conditions thereof and
419
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
Fa cult ad d e Der e
cho C ivi l
Chattel Mortgage Register (Art.
RPC).
C. FORECLOSURE
Q: How is chattel mortgage foreclosed? If what was mortgaged as a chattel is the building,
the chattel mortgage is valid as between the
A: parties only, on grounds of estoppel which would
Public sale preclude the mortgagor from assailing the
Private sale contract on the ground that its subject‐matter is
GR: If there is an express stipulation in an immovable. Therefore Vini’s defense is
the contract. untenable, and Felicia can foreclose the mortgage
over the building, observing, however, the
XPN: Fraud or duress procedure prescribed for the execution of sale of
a judgment debtor’s immovable under Rule 39,
Q: What is the procedure in foreclosure of a Rules of Court, specifically, that the notice of
chattel mortgage? auction sale should be published in a newspaper
of general circulation. (1994 Bar Question)
A: The mortgagee may, after thirty (30) days from
the time of the default or from the time the
condition is violated, cause the mortgaged VII. ANTICHRESIS
property to be sold at public auction by a public
officer (Sec. 14, Act No. 1508) A. DEFINITION AND CHARACTERISTICS
Q: What is antichresis?
The 30‐day period to foreclose a chattel mortgage
is the minimum period after violation of the A: It is a contract whereby the CR acquires the
mortgage condition for the mortgage right to receive the fruits of an immovable of the
The creditor has at least ten (10) days notice debtor, with the obligation to apply them to the
served to the mortgagor payment of interest, if owing, and thereafter to
the principal of his credit.
The notice of time, place and purpose of such
sale, is posted Q: What are the characteristics of antichresis?
After the sale of the chattel at public auction, the right of redemption is no longer available to the
Q: What are the legal consequences of establishing a chattel mortgage over a building
A:
1. Antichretic creditor – one who receives
the fruits on the immovable property of
the debtor.
2. Antichretic debtor – one who pays his
debt through the application of the
fruits of his immovable property.
421
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II
VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA U NIVERSITY OF S ANTO TOMAS
V CHAIR FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE: JEANELLE C. LEE
F
cha oc uCl ti v
a idl d e D e r e
CIVIL LAW TEAM:
421 ADVISER: ATTY. ELMER T. RABUYA; SUBJECT HEAD: ALFREDO B. DIMAFELIX II;
ICE ASST. SUBJECT HEADS: KAREN FELIZ G. SUPNAD, LAMBERTO L. SANTOS III; MEMBERS: PAUL ELBERT E. AMON, ALSTON ANARNA, OZAN
VICE CHAIRS FOR LAY‐OUT
J. FAULLEROS
ND DESIGN : EARLM.
, CECILIO LOUIE M. M
JIMENO R., ISMAEL&SARANGAYA
, JASACAYAN THEENA C., JM
R.;ARTINEZ
CONTRIBUTORS: LOISE RAE G. NAVAL, MONICA JUCOM
B. OBLIGATIONS OF ANTICHRETIC CREDITOR reimburse or compensate another in accordance
with the principle that no one shall be unjustly
Q: What are the obligations of an antichretic enriched at the expense of another. (Art. 2142,
creditor? NCC)
Q: How can the creditor be exempted from the Q: What are the essential requisites for
obligations imposed by Art. 2135? negostiorum gestio?
ACADEMICS CHAIR: LESTER JAY ALAN E. FLORES II VICE CHAIRS FOR ACADEMICS: KAREN JOY
G. SABUGO & JOHN HENRY C. MENDOZA
CIVIL LAW TEAM:
426 ADVISER: ATTY. ELMER T. RABUYA; SUBJECT HEAD: ALFREDO B. DIMAFELIX II;
...VICE CHAIR FOR ADMINISTRATION
ASST. SUBJECT
AND FH EADS::KJAREN
INANCE FELIZ
EANELLE LEESUPNAD, LAMBERTO L. SANTOS III;FMaEMBERS
C. G. c u:lPtAULaEd LBERTd
E. AeMOND, AeLSTON
.
r eANARNA, OZAN
VICE CHAIRS FOR LAY‐OUT J. FAULLEROS
ND DESIGN : EARLM.
, CECILIO LOUIE M. M
JIMENO R., ISMAEL&SARANGAYA
, JASACAYAN THEENA C., JM
R.;ARTINEZ
CONTRIBUTORS : L
cho C ivi l
OISE R AE G. N AVAL, M ONICA J UCOM ..
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
425
5. Approval by the creditors of the 3. Upon the request to the court, all
debtor’s proposition (Sec. 8, [20]); pending executions against the debtor
6. The Double Majority Rule applies. To shall be suspended except execution
obtain a majority vote, it is necessary against property especially mortgaged.
that: (Sec. 6)
a. At least 2/3 of the creditors
must vote on the same Q: Who are the creditors afected by the filing of
proposition, and the petition?
b. Said 2/3 represent at least 3/5
of the total liabilities of the A: Only creditors included in the schedules filed
debtor. by the debtor shall be cited to appear and to take
part in the meeting. (Sec. 5) Hence, those who did
7. Objections, if any, to the decision must not appear because they were not informed of
be made within 10 days following the the proceedings are unaffected by the same.
meeting. (Sec. 11);
8. Issuance of order by the court directing Q: Who are the creditors not afected by order
that the agreement be carried out in of suspension of payments?
case the decision is declared valid, or
when no objection to said decision has A:
been presented. 1. Those having claims for personal labor,
maintenance, expenses of the last
Q: What are the documents that should illness and funeral of wife or child of
accompany the petition? debtor, incurred during the 60 days
immediately preceding the filing of the
A: petition; and
1. A verified schedule containing a full and
true statement of the debts and 2. Those having legal or contractual
liabilities of the petitioner together with mortgages. (Sec. 9)
a list of creditors; (Secs. 15, 2)
2. A verified inventory containing a list of Q: When is a petition for suspension of
creditors, an accurate description of all payments deemed rejected?
the property of the petitioner including
property exempt from execution and a A:
statement as to the value of each item 1. When the number of creditors
of property, its location, and representing at least 3/5 of the
encumbrances thereon, if any; (Secs. liabilities not attend; (Secs. 8, 10) or
16, 2) 2. When the two majorities required are
3. A statement of his assets and liabilities; not in favor of the proposed agreement
(Sec. 2) and (Sec. 10).
4. The proposed agreements he requests
of his creditors. (Ibid.) Q: What is the efect of disapproval of petition?
C. VOLUNTARY INSOLVENCY
A:
1. Filing of the petition by the debtor
Duration praying for the declaration of insolvency
(Sec.2);
2. Issuance of an order of adjudication
180 days or 3 months declaring the petitioner insolvent
(Sec.18);
3. Publication and service of the order
Filed by (Sec. 19);
4. Meeting of the creditors to elect the
The debtor, natural or juridical person
assignee in insolvency (Sec. 30);
5. Conveyance of the debtor’s property by
the clerk of court to the assignee (Sec.
32);
Effect 6. Liquidation of the debtor’s assets and
payment of his debts (Sec. 33);
7. Composition, if agreed upon (Sec. 63);
8. Discharge of the debtor on his
application (Sec. 64), except a
Effects of fling the pettion
corporation;
9. Objection, if any, to the discharge (Sec.
66);
10. Appeal to the SC in certiorari.
Q: X, a well‐known architect, is sufering from
financial reverses. He has four creditors with a
total claim of P26 Million. Despite his intention
to pay these obligations, his current assets are
insufficient to cover all of them. His creditors are
about to sue him. Consequently, he was
constrained to file a petition for insolvency.
Since X was merely forced by circumstances to
Q: What are the modes or forms of suspension petition the court to declare him insolvent, can
of payment? the judge properly treat the petition as one for
involuntary insolvency? Explain.
A:
1. Petition for ordinary suspension of A: The petition cannot be treated as one of
payments under Act 1956 involuntary insolvency, because it was filed by X
himself, the debtor, and not by his creditors (Sec. Q: Who may petition for voluntary insolvency?
20). To treat it as one of involuntary insolvency
would unduly benefit X as a debtor, because he A: The petition may be filed by any officer duly
would not be subject to the limitation of time authorized by the vote of the board of directors
within which he is subject in the case of voluntary or trustees at a meeting especially called for that
insolvency for purposes of discharge (Sec. 65). purpose, or by assent in writing of the majority of
the directors or trustees, as the case may be. (Sec.
Q: What are the requisites of petition for 52)
voluntary insolvency?
Q: What is the efect of filing petition?
A: The petition which must be verified (Sec. 17) is
to be filed: A: Once the petition is filed, it ipso facto takes
away and deprives the debtor petitioner of the
1. By an insolvent debtor right to do or commit any act of preference as to
2. Owing debts exceeding in amount the sum creditors, pending the final adjudication.
of P1,000.00 (Philippine Trust Co. v. National Bank, 42 Phil 413)
3. In the RTC of the province or city in which he
has resided for 6 months next preceding the Q: What are the efects of court order declaring
filing of such petition, and debtor insolvent?
4. Setting forth in his petition the following:
a. His place of residence; A:
b. The period of residence therein 1. All the assets of the debtor not exempt
immediately prior to filing said from execution are taken possession of
petition; by the sheriff until the appointment of a
c. His inability to pay all his debts in receiver or assignee;
full; 2. The payment to the debtor of any debts
d. His willingness to surrender all his due to him and the delivery to the
property, estate, and effects not debtor or to any person for him of any
exempt from execution for the property belonging to him, and the
benefit of his creditors; and transfer of any property by him are
e. An application to be adjudged an forbidden;
insolvent. (Sec. 14) 3. All civil proceedings pending against the
insolvent debtor shall be stayed; and
Q: What are the documents to accompany the 4. Mortgages or pledges, attachments, or
petition? executions on property of the debtor
duly recorded and not dissolved are not
A: affected by the order. (Sec. 59)
1. A verified schedule must contain:
a. A full and true statement of all
debts and liabilities of the D. INVOLUNTARY INSOLVENCY
insolvent debtor; and
b. An outline of the facts giving rise or
which might give rise to a cause of Q: What is an involuntary insolvency?
action against such insolvent
debtor; (Sec. 15) A: This is availed of by the petition of 3 or more
creditors, none of whom became a creditor by
2. A verified inventory, which must contain: assignment within 30 days prior to filing of
a. An accurate description of all the petition and whose aggregate credit is not less
personal and real property of the than P1,000.00, because of commission of one or
insolvent exempt or not from more acts of insolvency. (Sec. 20)
execution including a statement as
to its value, location and Q: What are the acts of insolvency?
encumbrances thereon; and
b. An outline of the facts giving rise or A:
which might give rise to a right of 1. Such person is about to depart or has
action in favor of the insolvent departed from the Philippines, with intent to
debtor. (Sec. 16) defraud his creditors;
Illustrations:
1. A creditor by assignment of credit made
within 30 days from date of cleavage
shall be disqualified as petitioning
creditor (Sec. 20);
2. Attachment levied upon within a period
of 30 days before the date of cleavage
may be set aside by the assignee (Sec.
32);
Bond is not 3. Judgment on cases filed and decided
required.
within 30 days prior to the date of
Q: Who is an assignee in insolvency? cleavage may be set aside by the
assignee (Sec. 32);
A: A person elected by the creditors or appointed 4. Judgments on cases filed before 30 days
by the court to whom an insolvent debtor makes from the date of cleavage but decided
an assignment of all his property for the benefit within 30 days because of confession of
of his creditors. judgment or declaration of default by
debtor may be set aside by action of
Note: The assignee must be a person elected by assignee;
the majority of the creditors who have proven 5. Properties acquired after date of
their claims, such majority being in number and cleavage, after discharge of debtor in
amount.
A:
DEBTS THAT MAY BE PROVED
The debts which may be proved against the estate of the
debtor in insolvency proceedings are the following:
1. All debts due and payable from the debtor at the time of adjudication of insolvency; (Sec. 53)
2. All debts existing at the time of the adjudication of insolvency but not payable until a future time, a discount being made if no interest
3. Any debt of the insolvent arising from his liability as indorser, surety, bail or guarantor, where such liability became absolute after the
4. Other contingent debts and contingent liabilities contracted by the insolvent if the contingency shall happen before the order of fina
5. Any debt of the insolvent arising from his liability to any person liable as bail, surety, or guarantor or otherwise, for the insolvent, ho sh
A:
1. Claim arose after commencement of proceedings –
An obligation coming in force after the initiation of the
proceedings is not generally a proper claim to be
proved.
Q: What is composition?
2. Claim owned by insolvent purchased
after insolvency – One indebted to an
A: It is an agreement, made upon a sufficient
insolvent will not be permitted to
consideration, between an insolvent or
interpose as an offset, a claim owned by
embarrassed debtor and his creditors, whereby
the insolvent which he has purchased
the latter for the sake of immediate or sooner
after the insolvency.
payment, agree to accept a dividend less than the
whole amount of their claims, to be distributed
pro rata, in discharge and satisfaction of the
whole debt.
Q: Distinguish composition from accord. 4. The insolvent shall be released from his
debts
A: Accord properly denotes an agreement
between a debtor and a single creditor for a Q: When may confirmation be set aside?
discharge of the obligation by a part payment or
on different terms. A: The court may, upon application of a party in
interest within 6 months after the composition
Composition, on the other hand, designates an has been confirmed, set the same aside and
arrangement between a debtor and the whole reinstate the case if it shall be made to appear
body of his creditors (or at least a considerable upon a trial:
portion of them) for the liquidation of their claims 1. That fraud was practiced in the
by the dividend offered. procuring of such composition; and
2. The knowledge thereof has come to the
Q: What are the requirements for a valid ofer of petitioner since the confirmation of
composition? such composition. (Sec. 63)
A: Q: What is discharge?
1. The offer of the terms of composition
must be made after the filing of the A: Discharge, under the Insolvency Law, is the
schedule of the debtor’s property and formal and judicial release of an insolvent debtor
the submission of the list of his from his debts with the exception of those
creditors; expressly reserved by law.
2. The offer must be accepted in writing
by a majority of the creditors Note: Only natural persons may ask for discharge;
representing a majority of the claims corporations cannot ask for discharge. (Sec. 52)
which have been allowed; When granted, takes effect not from its date, but
3. It must be made after the depositing in from the commencement of the proceedings in
such place designated by the court, the insolvency.
consideration to be paid and the costs
of the proceedings; and Q: When insolvent debtor may apply for
4. The terms of the composition must be discharge?
approved or confirmed by the court.
(Sec. 63) A: A debtor may apply to the RTC for a discharge
at anytime after the expiration of 3 months from
Q: When may the court confirm a composition? the adjudication of insolvency, but not later than
1 year from such adjudication of insolvency,
A: When: unless the property of the insolvent has not been
1. It is for the best interest of the converted into money (Sec. 64) without his fault,
creditors; thereby delaying the distribution of dividends
2. The debtor has not been guilty of any of among the creditors in which case the court may
the acts, or of a failure to perform any extend the period
of the duties which would create a bar
to his discharge; and Any creditor may oppose the discharge by filing
3. The offer and its acceptance are in good his objections thereto, specifying the grounds of
faith and have not been made or his opposition. After the debtor has filed and
procured in a manner forbidden by the served his verified answer, the court shall try the
Act. issue or issues raised. (Sec. 66)
Q: What are the efects of confirmation of Q: What are the requisites for discharge?
composition?
A:
A: 1. Compliance with statutory
1. The consideration shall be distributed requirements regarding surrender of his
as the judge shall direct; assets for the benefit of the creditors
2. The insolvency proceedings shall be and regarding the rendition of an
dismissed; account of his assets and liabilities;
3. The title to the insolvent’s estate shall
revert in him; a. Note: A discharge in insolvency
is a matter of legislative grace