MBTC v ASB HOLDINGS suspends, there is no impairment of contracts,
specifically its lien on the mortgaged properties.
FACTS: The court also emphasized that the purpose of Metropolitan Bank and Trust company is a creditor rehabilitating proceedings is to enable the company to bank of respondents corporation collectively known as gain new lease on life thereby allows creditors to be the ASB Group of Companies. ASB group of paid their claims from its earnings. rehabilitation companies is owner and developer of condominium contemplates a continuance of corporate life and and real estate projects which contracted loans to the activities in an effort to restore ad reinstate the petitioner which were secured by real estate financially distressed corporation to its former position mortgages. of successful operation and solvency. this is in consonance with the state's equitable distribution of wealth to protect investments and the public. The Later, ASB group of companies filed with the Securities approval of the rehabilitation plan by the SEC hearing and Exchange Commission a petition for rehabilitation panel, affirmed by both the SEC en banc and the court with prayer for suspension of actions and proceedings of appeals, is precisely in furtherance if the rationale against petitioners. However, despite the objection of behind P.D. No. 902-A, as amended which is "to effect Metropolitan bank and trust company for the a feasible and viable rehabilitation" of ailing rehabilitation plan, SEC granted the same. corporations which affect the public welfare.
Meanwhile, the contention of the petitioner in their
objection was that, the approval on the rehabilitation plan will impair the contract entered into by the ASB group of companies with the petitioner.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the approval of rehabilitation plan
impairs contract entered into and prejudiced creditors.
HELD:
The Supreme Court were not convinced that the
approval of the rehabilitation plan impair petitioner bank's lien over the mortgaged properties. Section 6 (c) of P.D. no. 902-A provides that "upon appointment of a management committee, rehabilitation receiver, board or body, pursuant to this Decree, all actions for claims against corporations, partnership or associations under management or receivership pending before any curt, tribunal, board or body shall be suspended." By that statutory provision, it is clear that the approval of the rehabilitation plan and the appointment of a rehabilitation reciever merely suspend the action for claims against respondent corporations. Petitioners banks preferred status over the unsecured creditors relative to the mortgage liens is retained, but the enforcement of such preference is suspended. the loan agreement between the parties have not been set aside and petitioner bank may still enforce its preference when the assets of ASB Group of companies will be liquidated. considering that the provisions of the loan agreements and merely
Third Division January 10, 2018 G.R. No. 204039 United Coconut Planters Bank, Petitioner Spouses Walter Uy and Lily Uy, Respondents Decision Martires, J.