Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Julianne Hood

Technology Evaluation Template

GENERAL INFORMATION

Technology
Technology Type:
Name: Age/Grade Level:
Do Ink Green K+
Application
Screen

Source: DK Pictures Inc.

Associated Learning Standard(s): Generally applicable

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION

This an app available on the Apple App Store that costs only $2.99. The app description
online says, “Classroom-tested by kids and teachers, this app emphasizes ease-of-use and
simplicity while still enabling fantastic results”. Teachers and students can use the live video
camera or import pre-recorded media, mix audio tracks from videos and the live camera, and
export Green Screen project files for sharing with others (plus a lot more cool stuff).

The Resource
Allows Students Y/N N/A
To:

Content and Create: Students can use creative thinking or will create
Y
Pedagogy an innovative product.

Connect: Students can communicate with others outside


N
the classroom.

Research: Students can gather, evaluate, and use


Y
information.

Collaborate: Students can work together within the


classroom or outside of the classroom. They can build Y
upon each other’s knowledge and work.

Contextualize: Students can make connections between


content areas, ideas, and/or solve problems in a real-world Y
context.
Critique: Students must think critically, solve problems,
Y
evaluate information, and make informed decisions.

Build Technology Skills: Students must understand or


be able to use technology concepts, systems, and Y
operations.

RECOMMENDATION

I would recommend this resource for group projects or for part of a lesson. More advanced
students can make their own green screen presentation, or teachers can make one for the
kids to watch. It’s completely up to your own creativity to design a film.

IMPLEMENTATION IDEAS

Like I said in my recommendation, this app can be used on pretty much any device that can
record. All you need is $3 for the app, a green screen, a camera, and your creativity to come
up with a unique movie. Since it’s such a vague-use app, pretty much any age group could
use this with guidance.

Note: The following criteria may also be considered in the use of this resource. However, it is
important to understand that these are secondary criteria to content and pedagogy.

The Resource
Allows Students Y/N N/A
To:

Work at different levels or paces: Students work is


Implementation Y
differentiated through the resource.

Gather data about themselves: Students can see their


progress because the resource contains a tracking system. *
Work intuitively: Students work easily with the resource
Y
because it is user friendly and intuitively designed.

Be motivated: Students are engaged and excited to use


Y
this resource.

The Resource
Y/N N/A
Is:

Logistics Free: There is no financial cost for the students, teacher, or N


school. $3

Easily Accessed: The resource does not require licensing


Y
and is available through the web.

Reliable: The resource does not have frequent bugs and


may have some kind of trouble shooting support available Y
(either a “help” menu or a support team).

This template has been adapted from the following resources:


Christie, A., (2007). Dr. Alice Christie’s 6C Model for Evaluating Apps. Retrieved from
http://www.kathyschrock.net/uploads/3/9/2/2/392267/evalipad_content.pdf
ISTE, (2012). iste.nets•s Advancing Digital Age Learning. Retrieved from
http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-s-standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Schrock, K., (2011-14). Critical Evaluation of an Content-Based IPAD/IPOD APP. Retrieved
from
http://alicechristie.org/6C/6C.pdf.

Other resources on technology evaluation tools can also be found at:


http://learninginhand.com/blog/ways-to-evaluate-educational-apps.html

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi