Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 1.1. Loss of 1.1.1. Leaks / 1.1.1.1. Leak or rupture 1. Potential B BBB F F B F 1. Consider to install one KPE & KSO Containment Rupture at TGI metering hydrocarbon pair OPGD between facility release to metering shelter and atmosphere leading office area to fire / explosion impinged to office 2. Consider to install gas KPE & KSO area detector at control room door 2. Potential B BBB F F B F hydrocarbon 3. Consider to use KPE & KSO release to electrical and atmosphere leading instrument equipment to fire / explosion based on specification impinged to EDG & of HAC IA package 4. Consider to install KPE & KSO HVAC or move control room door to plant north side with panic door and gas tight type 5. Consider to install KPE & KSO flame detector with fire & gas mapping study to avoid blind spot area 1.1.1.2. Leak or rupture 1. Potential B BBB F F B F 9. Consider to install one KPE & KSO at Duri regulator hydrocarbon pair OPGD between area release to regulator and EDG & atmosphere leading IA package to fire / explosion impinged to EDG & IA package 1.2. Non- 1.2.1. Electrical 1.2.1.1. Electrical short 1. Electrical fire 1. Smoke detector B BBB F F B F 6. Consider to provide fire KPE & KSO Hydrocarbon Fires circuit at control leading to suppression system Fires room / Panel equipment damage 2. Portable fire electrical cabinet room and plant shutdown extinguisher (general) 3. Heat detector 1.2.1.2. Battery room 1. Electrical fire 1. Smoke detector B BBB F F B F 8. Consider to provide KPE & KSO electrical fire leading to explosion sufficient portable fire causing to 2. Heat detector extinguisher (general) equipment damage 3. Portable fire and plant shutdown extinguisher 1.2.2. Combustible 1.2.2.1. Combustible 1. Fire at office area 1. Smoke detector B BBB B B B B 7. Consider to install fire KPE & KSO Material material from alarm control panel for office work 2. Heat detector building (general) 3. Portable fire extinguisher Node: 1. Duri Facility Drawings: Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 4. Manual call point 1.2.3. Static 1.2.3.1. Spark 1. Differential current 1. Grounding of Electricity leading to fire equipment to prevent static electrical discharges 1.2.4. Lightning 1.2.4.1. Lightning strike 1. No adverse 1. Lightning Fires consequence protection 1.3. Transport 1.3.1. Vehicle crash 1.3.1.1. No issue of Accidents / collision to concern installation identified 1.3.2. Vehicle 1.3.2.1. No issue of accidents concern identified 1.4. Personnel 1.4.1. Falls 1.4.1.1. No issue of Accidents concern identified 1.4.2. Burn 1.4.2.1. No issue of concern identified 1.4.3. Working at 1.4.3.1. No issue of Height concern identified 1.4.4. Radiation 1.4.4.1. Radiation 1. Personnel ilness in 1. Proper PPE exposure exposure during prolonged time construction 2. Warning Sign (NDT) 3. PTW 4. JSA 1.4.5. Confined 1.4.5.1. No issue of space works concern identified 1.4.6. Ergonomics 1.4.6.1. No issue of concern identified 1.5. Constructability 1.5.1. Drop Objects 1.5.1.1. Lifting devices 1. Personnel injury / 1. Warning Sign failure fatality 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger Node: 1. Duri Facility Drawings: Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 5. JSA 2. Equipment damage 1. Warning Sign 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 1.5.2. Heavy duty 1.5.2.1. Heavy duty 1. Personnel injury / 1. Warning Sign vehicle vehicle swing fatality movement impact accident 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2. Equipment damage 1. Warning Sign 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 1.5.3. Hot Work 1.5.3.1. Electric shock 1. Personnel Injury 1. PPE 2. PTW 3. JSA 1.5.4. High pressure 1.5.4.1. High pressure 1. Personnel Injury / 1. Barricades hazards impact during fatality pressure test 2. PTW 3. JSA 1.6. Evacuations 1.6.1. Mustering 1.6.1.1. No issue of concern identified 1.7. Design 1.7.1. Design 1.7.1.1. No issue of Consideration Consideration concern identified 1.8. Structural 1.8.1. Structural 1.8.1.1. No issue of failure (i.e. concern Structural/sup identified port faitgue) Node: 1. Duri Facility Drawings: Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 1.8.2. Earthquake 1.8.2.1. No issue of concern identified 1.9. Miscellaneous 1.9.1. Sabotage 1.9.1.1. No issue of concern identified
Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 2.1. Loss of 2.1.1. Leaks / 2.1.1.1. Leak or rupture 1. Potential 1. Fusible plug B BBB F F K M 10. Consider to conduct KPE Containment Rupture at LBCV facility hydrocarbon interlock to close Quantitative Risk release to LBCV Assessment complete atmosphere leading with risk contour to fire (potential 2. Preventive & ignition from vehicle Periodic and community maintenace activity) causing during turn community injury around and fatality 2.2. Non- 2.2.1. Electrical 2.2.1.1. No issue of Hydrocarbon Fires concern Fires identified 2.2.2. Combustible 2.2.2.1. No issue of Material concern identified 2.2.3. Static 2.2.3.1. No issue of Electricity concern identified 2.2.4. Lightning 2.2.4.1. No issue of Fires concern identified 2.3. Transport 2.3.1. Vehicle crash 2.3.1.1. Vehicle crash to 1. Potential Accidents / collision to LBCV hydrocarbon installation release to atmosphere leading to fire (potential ignition from vehicle and community activity) causing community injury and fatality 2.3.2. Vehicle 2.3.2.1. No issue of accidents concern Node: 2. Pipeline Duri - Dumai Drawings: PGDD-KPE-1472-00-EPL-DG-004 Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR identified 2.4. Personnel 2.4.1. Falls 2.4.1.1. Personnel 1. Personnel injury 1. Barricades Accidents falldown to trench 2. PTW 3. JSA 2.4.2. Burn 2.4.2.1. FJC application 1. Personnel injury 1. PPE 2. PTW 3. JSA 2.4.3. Working at 2.4.3.1. No issue of Height concern identified 2.4.4. Radiation 2.4.4.1. Radiation 1. Personnel ilness in 1. Proper PPE exposure exposure during prolonged time construction 2. Warning Sign (NDT) 3. PTW 4. JSA 2.4.5. Confined 2.4.5.1. No issue of space works concern identified 2.4.6. Ergonomics 2.4.6.1. No issue of concern identified 2.5. Constructability 2.5.1. Drop Objects 2.5.1.1. Lifting devices 1. Personnel injury / 1. Warning Sign failure fatality 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2. Equipment damage 1. Warning Sign 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2.5.2. Heavy duty 2.5.2.1. Heavy duty 1. Personnel injury / 1. Warning Sign vehicle vehicle swing fatality movement impact accident 2. Barricades Node: 2. Pipeline Duri - Dumai Drawings: PGDD-KPE-1472-00-EPL-DG-004 Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2. Equipment damage 1. Warning Sign 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2.5.3. Hot Work 2.5.3.1. Electric shock 1. Personnel Injury 1. PPE 2. PTW 3. JSA 2.5.4. High pressure 2.5.4.1. High pressure 1. Personnel Injury / 1. Barricades hazards impact during fatality pressure test 2. PTW 3. JSA 2.6. Evacuations 2.6.1. Mustering 2.6.1.1. No issue of concern identified 2.7. Design 2.7.1. Design 2.7.1.1. No issue of Consideration Consideration concern identified 2.8. Structural 2.8.1. Structural 2.8.1.1. No issue of failure (i.e. concern Structural/sup identified port faitgue) 2.8.2. Earthquake 2.8.2.1. No issue of concern identified 2.9. Miscellaneous 2.9.1. Sabotage 2.9.1.1. Burglary, theft 1. Equipment loss or 1. Fence or sabotage damage 2. Security patrol
Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 3.1. Loss of 3.1.1. Leaks / 3.1.1.1. Leak or rupture 1. Potential 1. F&G detection Containment Rupture at Dumai facility hydrocarbon system release to Node: 3. Dumai Facility Drawings: PGDD-KPE-1472-00-EPG-DG-004 Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR atmosphere leading 2. Fire Water to fire impinged to system surrounding equipment 3. Portable fire extinguisher 4. Blowdown system 3.2. Non- 3.2.1. Electrical 3.2.1.1. No issue of Hydrocarbon Fires concern Fires identified 3.2.2. Combustible 3.2.2.1. No issue of Material concern identified 3.2.3. Static 3.2.3.1. Spark 1. Differential current 1. Grounding of Electricity leading to fire equipment to prevent static electrical discharges 3.2.4. Lightning 3.2.4.1. Lightning strike 1. No adverse 1. Lightning Fires consequence protection 3.3. Transport 3.3.1. Vehicle crash 3.3.1.1. No issue of Accidents / collision to concern installation identified 3.3.2. Vehicle 3.3.2.1. No issue of accidents concern identified 3.4. Personnel 3.4.1. Falls 3.4.1.1. No issue of Accidents concern identified 3.4.2. Burn 3.4.2.1. No issue of concern identified 3.4.3. Working at 3.4.3.1. No issue of Height concern identified 3.4.4. Radiation 3.4.4.1. Radiation 1. Personnel ilness in 1. Proper PPE exposure exposure during prolonged time construction 2. Warning Sign (NDT) 3. PTW 4. JSA 3.4.5. Confined 3.4.5.1. No issue of space works concern Node: 3. Dumai Facility Drawings: PGDD-KPE-1472-00-EPG-DG-004 Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR identified 3.4.6. Ergonomics 3.4.6.1. No issue of concern identified 3.5. Constructability 3.5.1. Drop Objects 3.5.1.1. Lifting devices 1. Personnel injury / 1. Warning Sign failure fatality 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2. Equipment damage 1. Warning Sign 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 3.5.2. Heavy duty 3.5.2.1. Heavy duty 1. Personnel injury / 1. Warning Sign vehicle vehicle swing fatality movement impact accident 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 2. Equipment damage 1. Warning Sign 2. Barricades 3. PTW 4. Rigger 5. JSA 3.5.3. Hot Work 3.5.3.1. Electric shock 1. Personnel Injury 1. PPE 2. PTW 3. JSA 3.5.4. High pressure 3.5.4.1. High pressure 1. Personnel Injury / 1. Barricades hazards impact during fatality pressure test 2. PTW 3. JSA Node: 3. Dumai Facility Drawings: PGDD-KPE-1472-00-EPG-DG-004 Risk Category Parameter Deviation Causes Consequences Safeguards Matrix Recommendations Responsibility Status Remarks F R H L M S P RR 3.6. Evacuations 3.6.1. Mustering 3.6.1.1. No issue of concern identified 3.7. Design 3.7.1. Design 3.7.1.1. No issue of Consideration Consideration concern identified 3.8. Structural 3.8.1. Structural 3.8.1.1. No issue of failure (i.e. concern Structural/sup identified port faitgue) 3.8.2. Earthquake 3.8.2.1. No issue of concern identified 3.9. Miscellaneous 3.9.1. Sabotage 3.9.1.1. No issue of concern identified