Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Bib. Information (APA Baiduri, Dr. (2017). Elementary school students' spoken activities and their
Formatting): responses in math learning by peer-tutoring. International Journal of Instruction
10 (2), 145-160. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_10.pdf
Author(s) Affiliation: Dr. Baiduri, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Type of Resource: Scholarly
(Scholarly /Trade/Other)
Summary of essential analysis of 5th graders engaging in a mathematics peer-tutoring model
information: (heterogeneous groups)
teacher as a facilitator
student discourse
o students as questioners
metacognitive thinking
o students as communicators
spoken and written forms
group work, discussions, figures, sketches, diagrams, etc.
discusses students’ “self-driven responsibility”
model “manifested in their bravery to directly question and actively
participate in a group discussion”
Social Constructivism
Zone of Proximal Development
Vygotsky: “learning can be initiated through social negotiation in the
cultural context assisted by the language as the main tool.”
Zaini: “most effective learning method is by teaching others”
Way in which this source Elementary Math Learning
influences the field o Students’ use of language
related to your inquiry o Students’ ability to question
(ex. Math
teaching/learning
elementary)
Potential relevance to I plan to study student communication as a component of my research. I will
your research topic and record student discussions to help me analyze students’ understanding of
study: material and ability to communicate.
Stage of action research Background-this article supports my theory that students will benefit from
where the source will be working cooperatively with peers.
used:
Findings/Conclusions-I believe that results of my research will be similar to
Baiduri’s, in that students will benefit from the opportunity to
communicate and question during math class.
Article 2
Topic: Problem Solving Instruction
Date Retrieved/Used: February 1, 2018
Bib. Information Gabriel, R., Sherman, K. (2016). Math word problems: Reading math
(APA Formatting): situations from the start. The Reading Teacher, 70 (4), 473-477.
doi:10.1002/trtr.1517
Author(s) Affiliation: Khristine Sherman-2nd-grade teacher at Granby Public Schools,
CT
Rachael Gabriel-assistant professor of literacy education at the
university of Connecticut
Type of Resource: Trade
(Scholarly
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential importance of students reading word problems carefully
information: similarities in math reasoning and reading processes
“beginning mathematicians can read, visualize, identify, and
categorize word problem situation types as a way to represent
mathematical thinking while problem solving”
understand and visualize scenarios and relationships
o draw, use manipulatives
Way in which this Elementary Math Learning
source influences the o discipline-specific reading
field related to your Elementary Math Teaching
inquiry (ex. Math o connect reading and math
teaching/learning o diagrams, graphic organizers
elementary)
Potential relevance In my own classroom, I am seeing a discrepancy between students’
to your research ability to solve computation problems and word problems. I recognize
topic and study: that I need to focus more attention on students’ comprehending what
they read in math class.
Stage of action Background- This article helps me to understand the connection
research where the between reading comprehension and math.
source will be used:
Article 3
Topic: Problem Solving Instruction
Date Retrieved/Used: February 1, 2018
Bib. Information Williamson, V. (2007). Mental maths- Passive to active. Mathematics
(APA Formatting): Teaching Incorporating Micromath, 201, 12-15. Retrieved from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-
wcupa.klnpa.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=113f5823-
daa6-418e-ba63-74972c9b9ab5%40sessionmgr101
Author(s) Affiliation: Williamson: Teacher in Africa
Bib. Information (APA Xin, Y. P., Liu, J., Jones, S. R., Tzur, R., & Si, L. (2016). A preliminary discourse analysis of
Formatting): constructivist-oriented mathematics instruction for a student with learning disabilities. The Journal
of Educational Research, 101(4), 436-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979910
Author(s) Affiliation: Yan Ping Xin, Jia Liua, and Luo Sia - Department of Educational Studies, Purdue
University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Sarah R. Jones- School of Teacher Education, Indiana Wesleyan University, Marion, Indiana
Ron Tzurc- School of Education & Human Development, University of Colorado Denver,
Denver, Colorado
Type of Resource: (Scholarly Scholarly
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential Common Core Standards “heavily emphasize conceptual understanding of ideas, mathematical modeling,
information: pattern or structure recognition and use, sense making of problems”
Constructivist learning-
o Prawat- “constructivist oriented learning theory promotes an inquiry-based instructional
environment where the learners assume an active role in their efforts to make sense of learning
materials and mathematical patterns”
“Inquiry based learning alone is not sufficient
balance of:
o teacher-directed, explicit instruction and
o student-centered, inquiry based instruction
o “structured or guided cognitive activity with a clear curricular focus”
CRA approach: Concrete-representational-abstract instructional sequence
o conceptual understandings of mathematical process, not “mimicking procedures”
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: “instructional programs…should enable students to organize
and consolidate their mathematical thinking through communication [and to] use the langue of
mathematics to express mathematical ideas precisely”
Bloom’s Taxonomy
o high-level intellectual work: explain, predict, justify, illustrate, pose problems
Research Questions:
o intellectual level of discourse moves of teacher and student
ability of student to reason (justify a solution, make connections, etc.)
o cognitive levels of solving and reasoning:
concrete, semi-concrete, or abstract
o “How did constructivist-oriented instruction impact the student’s word problem-solving
performance?”
Potential relevance to The research is very similar to what I want to do in my own classroom. This study focused on one
your research topic student, while I will most likely work with a small group of students.
and study:
Stage of action Data Collection/Analysis Methodology- I am interested in the way that these researchers coded
research where the classroom discourse.
source will be used:
Article 5
Topic: Standards, Curriculum, Student Discourse, Constructivism
Date Retrieved/Used: February 3, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Prawat, R. S. Are changes in views about mathematics teaching sufficient? The
Formatting): case of a fifth-grade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 125-211.
Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1001701
Author(s) Affiliation: Richard S. Prawat- Michigan State University
Bib. Information (APA Petrillii, M. F. (2017). A common core curriculum quandary. Education Next, 17(3).
Formatting): Retrieved from: http://educationnext.org/a-common-core-curriculum-quandary-
eureka-math-open-source/
Author(s) Affiliation: Michael F. Petrilli: President of Thomas B. Fordham Institute, executive editor at
Education Next
Type of Resource: Trade
(Scholarly
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential “fewer than one in five teachers said their instructional materials were well aligned
information: to the Common Core, according to a national Education Week survey.”
curriculum has a strong impact on student learning
Eureka Math is the “David to Pearson’s Goliath”
History:
o Great Minds won a contract from NY State through Race to the Top Grant
o designed by teachers and scholars in response to common core standards
o EngageNY became popular across the country
o “filled the beast’s need to procure”
o “…top-down funding and bottom-up design.”
Attributes:
o fact fluency: “Unlike some other popular programs,…doesn’t overlook the
need to develop students’ fluency with mathematical
procedures…Elementary students are expected to know their addition and
multiplication facts, for example, and practice them frequently”
o “…holds high expectations for what teachers are capable of…”
o OER-open educational resource, available on the Internet
o Free, but “…most want print materials plus professional development”
Way in which this Math Curriculum: This article provides background knowledge about the Eureka
source influences the math curriculum.
field related to your
inquiry (ex. Math
teaching/learning
elementary)
Potential relevance to This article helps me to understand the history and of Eureka math and how it
your research topic differs from other curricula.
and study:
Stage of action Background- After reading this article, I have a better understanding of Eureka Math
research where the and how it is different from other curricula.
source will be used:
Article 7
Topic: Classroom Discourse: Mathematics
Date Retrieved/Used: March 7, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Pierson Bishop, J. and Whitacre, I. (2010). Intellectual work: The depth of
Formatting): mathematical discourse and its relationship to student learning. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for
the Psychology of Mathematics Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus,
OH Online <PDF>. 2014-11-27
from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p429435_index.html
Author(s) Affiliation: Jessica Pierson Bishop & Ian Whitacre: San Diego State University
According to the article the district planned to “send home newsletters and homework help
sheets to parents to ease the transition” The article also referenced Eureka’s online references
. While the district piloted Eureka they it “hosted tutoring sessions for parents to better
understand the content.”
Way in which this source Math curriculum: the article provides honest feedback from teachers and parents trying Eureka
influences the field related to
for the first time. It also describes the district’s reasoning for deciding to use the curriculum.
your inquiry (ex. Math
teaching/learning elementary)
Potential relevance to your I am comparing the reactions from teachers in this district to my own and that of my peers.
research topic and study:
Stage of action research where Findings/Conclusions-compare feedback from teachers and parents in this
the source will be used:
IAction Planning- This article inspired me to create a survey for my peers, students and their
parents about Eureka Math
Article 11
Topic: Curriculum
Date Retrieved/Used: April 10, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Eureka Math still top-rated curriculum-by far. (2016, April). doi: 202.223.1854.
Formatting): Retrieved from: https://s3.greatminds.org/documents/attachments/000/000/207/
original/EUREKA_EdReports_2016-Apr.pdf?1464110625 cited correctly?
Author(s) Affiliation: Eureka Math
Type of Resource: Trade
(Scholarly
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential The Great Minds website references edreports.org, (“independent nonprofit
information: organization that provides free, web-based reviews of instructional materials
evaluated on their alignment to the Common Core State Standards and other
indicators of high quality according to educators, including usability, teacher
support, and differentiation”)
Describes edreports.org: “Consumer Reports-style reviews” that “help teachers
principals, and district and state officials charged with purchasing materials make
more informed choices.”
“Long term, EdReports.org’s goal is to elevate the overall level of rigor and quality
of instructional materials by helping more informed consumers-teachers and
parents-demand better materials from those who supply the market.”
Eureka:
“clear leader among 20 reviewed math curricula for its focus/coherence, rigor, and
usability.
Out of 70 possible pointes, Eureka Math’s curricula for elementary grades averages
63.0 points, the highest of the curricula reviewed. The next highest average was
38.3.
Key Questions:
“First, is the instructional material aligned to the standards?”
“Second, how usable is the material?”
Way in which this Math teaching/learning: Math curricula and professional development are a vital
source influences the part of math instruction.
field related to your
inquiry (ex. Math
teaching/learning
elementary)
Potential relevance Edreport’s comparison of Eureka to other curricula helps me understand specific
to your research criteria for comparing curricula.
topic and study:
Stage of action Findings/Conclusions- I will compare the data in this report to my own experience
research where the using Eureka in my classroom.
source will be used:
Article 13
Topic: Curriculum
Date Retrieved/Used: April 17, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Womer, S. (2013, August 9). Teachers converge in Yuma for Common
Formatting):
Core math training. Sun, The (Yuma, AZ). Retrieved from:
http://www.yumasun.com/teachers-converge-in-yuma-for-common-
core-math-training/article_71abc2a2-d11b-5553-97f7-
63251da26b2d.html
Author(s) Affiliation: none
Type of Resource: (Scholarly Other: Newspaper article
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential This is a newspaper article about teachers engaging in professional
information:
development over the summer, when their Arizona school district
decided to adapt Eureka. Lurinda Ward, director of learning services at
Yuma Elementary School District 1 in Arizona says that when the district
was looking for math curriculum that would help teachers implement
the Common Core Standards, they found Eureka. She says her school
district “realizes that the world is changing, what students need to know
and do has changed, therefore we are adopting a new way of teaching
and a new way of thinking. With the right curriculum and training
District 1 continues to work on having teachers prepare our students for
college and career readiness."
Way in which this source Math curriculum: What are the qualities that districts are looking for in a
influences the field related
to your inquiry (ex. Math curriculum?
teaching/learning
elementary)
Potential relevance to your The advantages of Eureka math that are mentioned in this article are
research topic and study:
similar to the advantages that I see as I use Eureka in my classroom.
Stage of action research Findings/Conclusions the conclusions about Eureka that are drawn in
where the source will be
used: this article are similar to my own findings.
Implications/Action Planning- I will continue to consider the opinions of
others as I determine what curriculum I believe will work best for my
students and my school.
Article 14
Topic: Curricula
Date Retrieved/Used: April 17, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Agodini, R., & Harris, B. (2016). How teacher and classroom characteristics moderate the effects of
Formatting):
four elementary math curricula. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2). Retrieved from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-wcupa.klnpa.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=
0a28a20f-8523-4e4c-a768-4c26d3eb2a3e%40sessionmgr103
Author(s) Affiliation: Roberto Agodini- “independent researcher focusing on the design and conduct of studies in
education”
Barbara Harris- Mathematica Policy Research
Type of Resource: Scholarly
(Scholarly
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential This is article describes a study to answer the question: “Do three of the teacher and classroom
information:
characteristics that influence curriculum implementation—namely, teachers’ knowledge, teachers’
attitudes to- ward instruction, and the need to differentiate instruction—moderate curriculum
effects? If so, how?” (Pg. 219)
National Science Foundation (NSF) (1990) funded a curriculum development , resulting in standards-
based curricula. They use a constructivist approach, where “students formulate and discuss
solutions to conceptually based problems, and aims to achieve this goal by primarily having students
interact about mathematics” (Pg. 218) Prior to this, “conventional curricula” focused on basic skills
and computation, where teachers communicated mathematics to students. (Pg. 219) “The
standards-based curricula in elementary grades also covered more topics in a particular grade than
conventional curricula and provided detailed guidance on how to implement the constructivist
approach to instruction. The idea was to guide carefully both the what and the how of teaching
mathematics.” (Pg. 219)
Some of the results are helpful as I evaluate my own findings:
Teacher Attitudes:“…if we view instruction along a continuum with constructivist approaches at one
end and explicit approaches at the other, this finding might suggest that the ideal instructional
approach in first and second grades is somewhere in the middle and includes both constructivist and
explicit approaches.” (Pg. 228)
Range of Classroom Ability: a curriculum with more constructivist approach may be easier to
differentiate. “For example, a common Investigations activity is to have students show (or write) all
of the ways to represent a particular number. Teachers could have tailored this activity to meet a
wide range of student ability levels by asking some students to represent a small or easy number
while asking other students to represent a much larger or complicated number.” (Pg. 229)
Way in which this Math Elementary Curricula-may not be “one size fits all.” It is important to consider how successful
source influences the
field related to your
curricula will be in various school and classroom environments. Districts and schools can therefore
inquiry (ex. Math consider their unique population of teachers and students in relation to the math curriculum they
teaching/learning are using.
elementary)
Potential relevance to
your research topic and
As I use the Eureka curriculum in my classroom, I am not simply learning about the curriculum itself.
study: I am observing the relationship between the curriculum and me, my students, my fellow teachers,
and other elements that affect math instruction. This article helps me to consider the elements: “(a)
teachers’ knowledge, (b) teachers’ attitude toward math instruction, and (c) the extent to which
teachers need to differentiate instruction in their classrooms.” (Pg. 216).
Stage of action research Findings/Conclusions-As I consider my own findings, it is helpful to consider elements in my
where the source will
be used:
classroom such as my own attitude toward math and the degree to which I need to differentiate
instruction to help students be successful.
Implications/Action Planning-As I form an opinion about Eureka math, I will consider not only the
curriculum itself, but how the curriculum relates to my students in my school.
Article 15
Topic: Problem Solving Instruction
Date Retrieved/Used: April 17, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Flynn, M. (2017). From answer-getters to problem solvers: Three-act tasks foster deeper
Formatting):
thinking and greater engagement in math class. Educational Leadership, 75(2), 26-31.
Author(s) Affiliation: Mike Flynn: director of Mathematics Leadership Programs and the Master of Arts in
Mathematics Teaching Program-Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts
Type of Resource: Trade
(Scholarly
/Trade/Other)
Summary of essential “Answer-getting is a narrow view of what it means to engage in mathematics” (direct
information:
teaching, mnemonic devices, “tricks for students to remember steps for performing
calculations,” etc.) (pg. 27) “
“Today’s world requires problem solvers, not answer getters…people who understand
how to analyze a situation, identify a problem, gather an dort available information,
choose from a variety of methods for solving the problem, and communicate their
reasoning.” (pg. 27)
“Problem solving is a process, and students need opportunities to engage in all aspects of
that process to develop the skills and habits of mind to become effective problem
solvers.” (pg. 27).
Flynn describes “three-act task” as an instructional tool
Act 1-The hook, “gets students invested…where students identify the question they’d like
to explore.” Teacher answers general questions, not ones that require mathematical
problem solving. “Question formulation and exploration are key parts of the problem-
solving process.” (pg. 27)
Act 2- students “gather information and decide what information they need to answer
their question…also involves students actively working toward a solution in small groups”
“The emphasis of three-act tasks is much more on the problem-solving process than on
the solution, and part of the process is working through what to do when you have
multiple solutions” (pg. 28)
Act 3- students “present their findings to the class…multiple solutions and strategies.”
Students may “argue their points and critique the reasoning of others.” The teacher then
concludes with a final video or image “that definitively answers the question and provides
a satisfying resolution to the problem.” (pg. 28)
Way in which this Math teaching: This article describes an instructional strategy for math teachers. It
source influences the
field related to your encourages student discourse and active problem solving (rather than passive learning).
inquiry (ex. Math
teaching/learning
elementary)
Potential relevance to I feel that Eureka curriculum goes “beyond worksheets” and encourages students to be
your research topic
and study: problem solvers, leading to the engaged and in-depth conversations that students were
having in this article.
Stage of action
research where the
Implications/Action Planning- No matter which curriculum I am using, I am very excited
source will be used: to use the three-act instruction strategy. When I finished reading it with fellow math
teachers in my school. I want to investigate further into the online resources mentioned
on the website: Ascd.org/el1017lawton., http://blog.mrmeyer.com, http:// robertkaplinsky
.com/prbl-search- engine , https://gfletchy.com/3-act-lessons
Article 16
Topic: Problem Solving Instruction
Date Retrieved/Used: April 18, 2018
Bib. Information (APA Hohn, R. L., & Frey, B. (2002). Heuristic training and performance in elementary
Formatting): mathematical problem solving. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6). Retrieved
from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-wcupa. klnpa.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer
?vid=25&sid=39a5fdf2-c9e3-4412-9f7b-fba62e15ace1%40sessionmgr4010
Author(s) Affiliation: Robert L. Hohn and Bruce Frey- Department of Psychology and Research in
Education, University of Kansas
Type of Resource: Scholarly
(Scholarly /Trade/Other)
Summary of essential Phases of problem solving:
information: Problem representation (translation and integration)
Solution planning
Execution
Solution monitoring. (Pg. 374)
This is a study of 3-5th grade students who are taught a heuristic for solving math
problems:
SOLVED
S-State the Problem
O-Options to use
L-Links to the past
E-Execute your answer
D-Do check back (Pg. 374).
The authors compared SOLVED with a textbook based approach. Then they analyzed
“strategy use, to determine its relationship to performance…and to investigate whether
problem-solving performance would be maintained after a 2-week delay, with no
prompting present.” (Pg. 375)