Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
although this class, URPA 5351, is about the study of Human Resources in
government. I wanted to relate the findings to the content of the class, and I
quickly realized that this would involve more than a listing of particular software
throughout the course, I began to see that HR management acts within a political
distorted by forces that provide the framework for organizational existence at the
city, state, federal, and even regional level of political organization. And just as
the fact that HR acts within a political context, so also does technology ‘act’ within
a political context, and has social implications. Ultimately, the technology utilized
In narrowing the topic of this paper, I decided to focus on the values and the
forces that are shaping the way government uses and influences technology,
whether or not the values and forces reinforce one another, and some effects this
paper will not touch on many technologies such as GPS, GIS, particular designs
and protocols for future internet construction such as I2, and so forth. Due to the
nature of the topic, current information is somewhat difficult to unearth since until
sources I have used are easily accessible from the internet, fitting well with the
E-Government
and promote democracy. This roughly parallels the attempts in the private sector
economy. The Cox News Service reported as of February 27, 2007, that Texas
was ranked fourth in the amount of e-government initiatives. Has all of this
overall compared to other states (Keefe, 2007). While Texas builds prisons and
Texas, particularly Austin and the Dallas-Fort Worth area, helped usher in the
New Economy age during the 1990s, with the rise of high-tech and telecom jobs
and companies. But since then, Texas has been outpaced by states such as
does remains the same. On the other hand, he sees I-government as true
effects the relationship we have with our fellow man. One of the innovators in the
State”. In a 2006 online article, Allison Lake quotes Ms. Fountain as stating that
“we shouldn't really be talking about e-government anymore. We are well beyond
the e-mail and Web site stage. We need to return to the objective of government”
(Lake, 2006). Fountain made similar remarks back in October of 2005 in her
in Brussels. In the speech, she states that one of the three areas for future
At the core of democracy is the need to constantly fight against social inequalities.
not, I fear that without an explicit research agenda, we will just be building faster,
Fountain should be credited with the recognition that although technology has
inequality? Where is money being spent, and by whom, and for what type of
innovations? These and myriad other questions can be asked, most beyond the
scope of this paper, but one tool to take note of is Fountain’s introduction of the
the distinction between ICT itself, on the one hand, and the perceptions and use
of this technology by people. There has been debate about the number and type
whether or not it could be applied on a macro scale. However, her concepts for
the most part have served as a guiding light in the discussion of e-government,
and others have attempted to modify some of her ideas to better explain why
agree with Fountain’s argument, yet he does not outright reject them either.
Instead, he admits that she has made an important contribution, and he attempts
and Fountain, in the previously cited sources, have indicated a need for greater
For purposes of the rest of this paper, we will assume that there is indeed a
difference between ICT and the actors who use it. The focus will be on social
justice issues called for by Fountain rather than interoperability. Not only can ICT
shape the actions of the actors who use the technology, but the reverse is also
true. The actors themselves, including government and even individual citizens
(Schellong, 2007), who use technology, have the opportunity to shape future
actors, including government itself. How does this relate to social justice? There
are multiple answers to this question, but one of the biggest questions involves
how government influences the use and development of technology, and whether
this leads to social justice and a more representative society in terms of the hiring
upon further at the end of the discussion on forces/trends that affect technology
In order to understand how technology and other forces can affect HR hiring
decisions, let’s back up a moment and take a look at some of the values of HR,
government is concerned not just with finding competent employees, but also
that these employees are representative of society. Too often, however, the
government”, like the term “diversity”, can have several meanings. The first
meaning involves the idea of accountability of elected officials to the people that
multiformity and variety of different types of people included within our society.
The first definition implies that the person being elected by peers to represent
them will do so on some basis of merit, and that is the first value and benefit of a
for one’s work, since the elected official is answerable to voters, at least on
election day. The second definition implies the value and benefit of equal
opportunity to people who work in this country. However, it does not just mean
citizens of the United States, for better or for worse. Indeed, Title VII of the 1964
Civil Rights Act specifies that there should be no discrimination against any
individual due to race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. Despite questions
of fairness, Title VII implies that there is no longer such a thing as an “American
of a representative society and diversity when the target population for a job on
Anyone, that is, except a US citizen who has been screened out of the
different national origin may have a conviction as well, this would not be detected
out citizens of this country. Many local governments have requirements for
employment that a person must live within the boundaries of the city; however,
they also screen applicants based on background checks. Simply put, most
employers are unwilling to hire those with convictions, and if they are hired, they
end of working in menial labor where there is little chance of contact with the
public. Holtzer, Raphael, and Stoll (2001) stated in their study concerning
The study states that 9 percent of all men will serve time in state or federal
searches which are shared across the country. A man with a mark on his record
has no place to go to start a new life…anywhere he turns, the situation will be the
same in terms of the employment process. Yet the sad fact is that employers are
more willing to break the law by hiring foreigners and illegal aliens (who, by
definition, broke the law by entering the country illegally) than domestic ex-
offenders citizens. The forces behind this fact are the subject of the following
discussion on the economic plans formed and / or endorsed by some of the most
Forces
hiring decisions in government agencies, I will simply point towards a few major
and obvious trends that I believe influence the hiring process negatively in
relationship to the values that have thus far been hammered out through the
political process within the United States. Some might argue that each element
is not actually a negative force, such as the first force or element - the trend
and also how it might affect the hiring decision of HR professionals. The second
U.S. citizens compared to other countries of the world, and is more of a trend
change since the inception of the Pendelton Act of 1883, and includes
particularly true in reform states such as Texas, Florida, and Georgia. Focusing
on Texas, which has done away with a mandatory civil-service structure, and
there is still a balance in the interplay of values. In order to examine this issue,
behavior (e.g., whistleblowing, risk taking) and, at the same time, encourage
fairness). At a time when America’s best and brightest opt not to pursue
public service careers to others, and when antigovernment sentiment runs deep,
security—to meet its HR challenges. Far from helping curb the quiet crisis, at-will
that Coggburn believes that state laws also can have an effect on organizational
culture as well. And while I agree that a perfect storm may be brewing, I believe
that the problem has progressed far enough to have attracted the attention of
acceleration of effects, particularly the most negative effects, have taken place
while republicans have been in power. Were the country to move strongly back
to the left, I believe that there would be an attempt to address these excesses
that Coggburn sees on the horizon. However, the success of restoring a more
representative government and a representative bureaucracy, hopefully based on
merit, will largely be dependent on the stability and growth of the economy. At
the point of this writing, the housing market continues to crash, the dollar is
taking a continued beating on the exchange market and has reached all-time
lows against the euro, several major countries have or are considering
diversifying assets from dollars to other currencies, and consumer debt is soaring
while consumer spending has cooled. The BBC reported on April 30, 2007 that
the US and EU have agreed to build a common market (see endnotes for
reference), and of course there is the continued push for a North American
This, of course, leads to the second force that might provide a context for the
reached at the HR level. The second force to be discussed is the push towards
follow up of the NAFTA accords, and released the results of their study in their
2005 paper entitled “Building a North American Community”. While the Council
has no affiliation with the U.S. government, it is important to note that nearly
every former US president since WWII has been a member as well as the
majority of State Department influentials. The paper calls for a common market
and common security perimeter between Canada, the United States, and Mexico
on page 30 and 31 of the document. It does not call for a political union, but
keep in mind that economic union is a natural precursor for political union, just as
in the EU, and this will be even more pronounced since security will be an issue
on the table. Central to the arrangement is the issue of handling border security
in ways which would not impede the free movement of goods and people across
physical wall at the border. The biometric agreement is not suprising based on
the Smart Border Declaration update published by the (2004), which states that
the facial recognition biometric “had been selected as the globally interoperable
identifiers. The U.S. Department of State (2007) has informed the public
through their departmental website that the newly designed e-passports (U.S.
Electronic Passports) contain small electronic chips that enable the use of this
2002), although the technology may have improved since then. However,
cameras being installed around the country are being installed on roads and
traffic light intersections, so the probability is that the technology is being used
to read license plate tags, which it is more than accurate enough to perform.
software that detects the license plates from the feeds of these traffic light
cameras. Car tags from people that have been identified for whatever reason
as potential law-enforcement risks can be fed into the system, enabling police
the cameras and software had alerted them of the suspect’s location, and
Without getting into the legalities of privacy issues, which are a legitimate
that since 1980, the adult prison population has increased more than 300
percent, and that our incarceration rate is at least six times that of Canada,
Australia, and Western Europe. She wonders whether more people are
committing crimes in the United States as compared to the rest of the world, or if,
on the other hand, is there a political motivation to appear tough on crime. At any
rate, she points out that Federal crimes account for only 5 percent of all
prosecutions in the United States. Most prosecutions take place at the local
level. I will point to an article written by Paul Craig Roberts (2006), former
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. Apparently Mr.
Roberts believes that a great deal of this increase has come under the Bush
the US has the largest percentage of its citizens imprisoned of all countries in the
world, including China. One of every 32 US adults is behind bars, on probation or
on parole...the US has 700,000 more of its citizens incarcerated than China, a
country with a population four to five times larger than that of the US, and
1,330,000 more people in prison than crime-ridden Russia. The US has 5% of the
world’s population and 25% of the world’s prisoners. The American incarceration
rate is seven times higher than that of European countries. Either America is the
land of criminals, or something is seriously wrong with the criminal justice (sic)
system in "the land of the free”.
times allowed by law unless a person makes a plea-bargain deal, and not
surprisingly more than 95% or all felony cases are therefore settled with a plea
contrary to the Constitution of this country, and that these trends towards
criminalization of the American public are increasing due to illegal use of power,
such as spying without warrants. Roberts (2006), in another article, states the
following:
…We have reached a point where the Bush administration is determined to
totally eclipse the people. Bewitched by neoconservatives and lustful for power,
the Bush administration and the Republican Party are aligning themselves firmly
against the American people.
Their first victims, of course, were the true conservatives. Having eliminated
internal opposition, the Bush administration is now using blackmail obtained
through illegal spying on American citizens to silence the media and the
opposition party.
Whether or not one agrees with Roberts about the politicalization and corruption
fellow citizens. How many people do you know that have had a brush with the
law due to something like substance abuse or driving while under the influence?
People can get over a drinking or drug problem, but they can never get over a
both in private industry and in government. This is true whether the charge
lawmaker and outspoken anti-war activist (Head, 2006). The fact that certain
segments of the domestic population (blacks) are convicted at such high rates
were uniformly enforced to the same extent as laws concerning drugs, the prison
system would be crushed under it’s own weight. For some Americans born and
raised in this country, the idea of illegal immigrants being allowed to work illegally
we wish for those released from prison, or who otherwise have a mark on their
record, to be able to go on and live a clean life free from crime, then it is
important to not cut them off from employment for which they are suited and
capable of performing. Branding someone with a scarlet letter for life can in no
way contribute to the functioning of a just society, and is just as important a social
databases, the push for open borders, and the de-Americanization of jobs
located within corporations still located on US soil almost guarantees that the
Scarlet Letter will be branded on these men and women for life, even after they
professionals both within government and the private industry have the capability
of peeking into a person’s entire life through the use of background search
the United States, in comparison to the rest of the world, only portends a
continuance of the same trends due to the ability of law enforcement to watch
politicalized environment, and to create databases which are shared with the
criminalized, and those branded with convictions are screened out of the
employment process, while at the same time jobs are being given to newcomers
to the country, some of which broke the law by entering the country illegally.
However, although the author of this paper support legal immigration, this paper
is not meant to target illegal aliens, many of who come here in desperation
because they have absolutely no future in their own country. The real focus,
police who increasingly seem to have forgotten the constitution and Bill of Rights,
and the effects on the employability of those who have a conviction on their
record. The HR professional who does a background check usually does not ask
Instead, the assumption is made that the police made a moral arrest, and that the
legal system is for the most part infallible. The New York Civil Liberties Union
(2005) reports that over 1,800 people were arrested at the Republican National
evidence of police perjury. Some of these people will find that the mark on their
record will affect their employment for the rest of their life. On May 1, 2007,
LAPD police and SWAT teams used non-lethal (but still painful) rubber-bullet
Carol Sobel, president of the Los Angeles Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild.
“quite frankly, what happened is when the police decided to sweep the park and
close it down, there was no one that was doing anything more than heckling them.
And they were -- I wouldn't say “heckling,” even, I would say “criticizing” them
-- and they were doing it because what happened during the course of this march
is that the police wanted open up a street, and rather than talking to people and
saying, “Can you move onto the sidewalk? Can you move into the park now?”
what they did was run their motorcycles into women and children in the Aztec
dancers group, who were in the street at that point still. And the street was closed
to traffic, but they were in the street performing their ritual circle dance at the end
of the march. And so, you had the police doing one of the most provocative things
they could do, and all of a sudden it is the fault of the demonstrators when the
police literally use their motorcycles to strike people as a means of crowd control
and to strike women and children as a means of crowd control, when people were
peaceful…
…there are rules within the LAPD about how you set up a press area. They just
didn't care. I mean, they just -- you know, if a press person was knocked down,
they struck him with a baton to get him up. If the cameraman got knocked down
and the reporter tried to help him up, they beat the cameraman and the reporter. It
While some swaggering law-and-order types might promote a “that’s what you
get” attitude and wield the brand of the scarlet letter, it may be that the forces that
manner, and in such a way as to work against the values of social equality and
equal opportunity that are valued by the America public. If the public decides that
law-enforcement and the justice system have morphed into instruments of social
References:
Behn, Robert D. (2005). M-Gov,E-Gov, and I-Gov. Retrieved May 7, 2007 from
http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/cache/documents/7009.pdf
Denis, Dresang. (2002). Public personnel management and public policy. (4th
edition) New York: Addison Wesley Longman
Head, Tom. (2006, April 1). “Black Representative Accosted by DC Police for
Changing Hairstyle”. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from
http://civilliberty.about.com/b/a/257235.htm?iam=momma_100_SKD&terms=cynt
hia+mckinney+police
Holtzer, H.J., Raphael, S., and Stoll, M.A. (2001). “Will Employers Hire Ex-
Offenders? Employer Preferences, Background Checks, and Their
Determinants”. Retrieved May 07, 2007 from
http://www.jcpr.org/wpfiles/holzer_raphael_stoll.pdf?CFID=8979865&CFTOKEN=
46951486
Lake, Allison (2006, June 6). The Outlook For Digital Government. Public CIO.
Retrieved May 07, 2007, from
http://www.publiccio.com/story.php?id=99815&story_pg=3
The New York Civil Liberties Union(2005, August 30). “NYCLU Post-RNC
Report: City Must Change Protest Policies”. Retrieved May 8,
2007 from http://www.nyclu.org/rnc_report_pr_083005.html
Roberts, Paul Craig (2006, February 7). “My Epiphany: From Reaganaut to
Anti-War Radical”. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/060207_epiphany.htm
Schellong, Alexander. (2007). Extending the Technology Enactment
Framework. Part of the PNG Working Paper Series, Working Paper #
PNG07-003. Retrieved May 07, 2007 from
http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/netgov/files/png_workingpaper_series/PNG07-
003_WorkingPaper_extending_technology_enactment
_framework_schellong.pdf
Sobel, Carol. (2007, May 8). “LAPD Reassigns Two Top Commanders Who
Ordered Police to Shoot Rubber Bullets at Protesters & Journalists During
May Day Immigrants Rights Rally”. Interview with Amy Goodman of
Democracy Now!. Retrieved May 9, 2007 from
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/08/1328249