Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Outcome: To examine the effects of removing a keystone species from the environment using a virtual lab
Predation is one factor that can limit the growth of a population. When predation ceases, a prey population that is
normally somewhat stable can explode, causing effects to ripple out across the entire food web. The predator doesn’t
need to be an apex predator in order to have this kind of effect on a community. In this lab activity, you will see
what happens when such a keystone species is removed from an ecosystem.
Step 1: Choose only one organism from each trophic level and make sure that the food chain goes in a straight line from one trophic
level to the next.
Step 2: Click on Plant B icon. Let Plant B survive on its own and see what happens.
Step 3: Predict whether each species will survive, and whether it will increase or decrease in number, as well as whether Plant B
will survive to the end
Prediction:
All other species would survive, but there would be nothing to stop plant B from reaching the point of overpopulation, whilst plant
A will be taken out by herbivore A, possibly resulting in Plant B's takeover
Step 4: Click on the “Run” icon. The simulation will run for 100 days.
Step 6: Reset and run the simulation again and record your data.
Use X for "die out," ↑ for "increase in numbers," and ↓ for "decrease in numbers."
1. Was your prediction correct? How did you arrive at your prediction? What differences were there between your
prediction and the simulation?
My prediction was far from accurate, with nothing to stand in plant B's way, I expected it's population to continue growing
steadily, while the other populations would struggle to survive. But the results turned out to be the complete opposite
2. What would happen to this imaginary ecosystem if the producers were to die out?
Every other organism would suffer from starvation and will eventually be driven to extinction. without the producers, the
higher trophic levels cannot function properly as there is no energy is available to them.
3. Did any of the species increase in number? What could account for this increase? Which species decreased in number and
what might account for this decrease?
Both animals have shown an increase in number, with plant A having such a large population, the herbivores that feed on them are bound to
increase in number as well, this huge increase is also beneficial to the omnivores who feed off the herbivores, resulting in the omnivore
population showing an increase. With this massive increase in herbivores, both plant species A and B will decrease in number.
4. Which populations would benefit the most from the presence of decomposers?
Plants, this is because only plants can make use of the nutrients returned to the soil by decomposers.
Step 3: Click on all the plant icons. They plants should cover up the bare ground on simulation.
Step 4: Click Herbivore A. Select Herbivore A eats Plants A, Plant B, and Plant C.
Both plant populations will show a decrease in number, this is because there is a combination of herbivores and omnivores that feed
on them, the other species will stay the same, this is because the herbivore and omnivore population is still under control by the top
predator.
Step 11: Click on the “Run” icon. The simulation will run for 100 days.
Step 13: Run the simulation again and record your data.
Use X for "die out," ↑ for "increase in numbers," and ↓ for "decrease in numbers."
(X, , or ) Plant A Plant B Plant C Herbivore A Herbivore B Herbivore C Omnivore A Omnivore B Top Predator
Yes, I predicted that the plant population will decrease by a small amount, while the herbivore population will show a large
increase in population as the predator's population goes down by a small amount.
I realised that the plant population will be controlled by the herbivore and omnivores, while the herbivore population will be
controlled by the omnivores, resulting in the decrease of herbivores, and the top predator will keep the omnivore population
stable.
3. What differences were there between your prediction and the simulation?
A: Plants get a huge population reduction, plant A is completely wipe out, instead of reducing only slightly.
(which is surprising because plant A was proven to be stronger than other plant, but in this case, they go
extinct.) While herbivore get huge population increase, but in my prediction the herbivore should stay the same.
The omnivore instead of being the same, it’s population reduce quite drastic. (considering that it’s start with
only 100 omnivores.) Top predator instead of having relatively the same population, the top predator population
sky rocket.
Step 3: Click on all the plant icons. They plants should cover up the bare ground on simulation.
Step 4: Click Herbivore A. Select Herbivore A eats Plants A, Plant B, and Plant C.
Step 5: Click Herbivore B. Select Herbivore B eats Plants A, Plant B, and Plant C.
Prediction:
Step 11: Click on the “Run” icon. The simulation will run for 100 days.
Step 13: Run the simulation again and record your data.
Use X for "die out," ↑ for "increase in numbers," and ↓ for "decrease in numbers."
(X, , or ) Plant A Plant B Plant C Herbivore A Herbivore B Herbivore C Omnivore A Omnivore B Top Predator
Simulation 2 X
I predicted the plants, herbivores and predator's population correctly, while I missed the point that the omnivore only increased a
quarter in population..
Because the animals in the simulation tend to consume organisms in a particular order of A,B then C, I predicted that plant A would
be fed off first, then the herbivores would increase in population as they have so much to feed on while having only one predator
that feeds on them.
3. What differences were there between your prediction and the simulation?
I was accurate for the most part, the only thing I failed to predict was the omnivores small increase in number.
Step 3: Click on all the plant icons. They plants should cover up the bare ground on simulation.
Step 4: Click Herbivore A. Select Herbivore A
eats Plants A, Plant B, and Plant C.
Prediction:
Plants A, B and C will undergo the same process, A will go extinct while B will decease more than C, the herbivores however will
show a decrease this time round as there are two omnivores to feed on them.
Step 11: Click on the “Run” icon. The simulation will run for 100 days.
Step 13: Run the simulation again and record your data.
Use X for "die out," ↑ for "increase in numbers," and ↓ for "decrease in numbers."
(X, , or ) Plant A Plant B Plant C Herbivore A Herbivore B Herbivore C Omnivore A Omnivore B Top Predator
1. Was your prediction correct? What differences were there between your prediction and the simulation?
It was correct for the most part, I only failed to realise that plant B's population would remain the same
The species below that trophic level will overpopulate and use up all of its resources.
4. Was the ecosystem with or without the top predator most stable?
5. How long did it take for the ecosystem to become stable after the removal of the top predator?
70 days