TORTS AND DAMAGES
Arellano University School of Law
Tuesday Class (5:30-7:30)
2° Semester SY: 2017-2018
Atty. Amado Paolo C. Dimayuga
Breakdown:
Month No. of Meetings
(Excluding Exam Date)
January 3
February 4 a
March ate 3
April_ 4
May 4
Exams Period Scheduled | No. of Meetings before
Exam | scheduled exam
Mid-term Examinations | March 10-18 | March 13 | 7 meetings before
Mid-terms
Final Examinations | May 26-June3_|May29 | 10 meetings before Finals
TORTS
Arts. 2176-2194, NCC.
Definition, Elements - Assignment #1
A. Nature of Quasi-delict
1. Iniego v. Judge Purganan, G. R. No. 166876, March 24, 2006
B. Distinguished from Tort, Crime, Contract
1. Capitulo v. Laroya, G.R. No. 145391. August 26, 2002
2. Guaring, Jr. v. CA, G.R. No. 108395. March 7, 1997
3. Safeguard Security Agency v. Tangco, G.R. No. 165732,
December 14, 2006
C. Elements
4. Cagayan Il Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Rapanan and Tangonan,
GR. No. 199886, December 3, 2014
2. Smith Bell Dodwell Shipping Agency Corporation v. Borja, G.R. No.
143008. June 10, 2002vi.
vil.
Classification of Torts
A. Negligent Torts
B. Intentional Torts
C. Strict Liability
4. Art. 2187, NCC
2. Art. 100 Consumer Act
The Tortfeasor
A. Direct Tortfeasor
B. Persons made responsible for others
C. Nature of Liability
Concepts and Doctrines
A. Res Ipsa Loquitur
1. Carna and Yellow Bus Line, Inc. v. Gepaya-Lim, G.R. No.
218014, December 07, 2016
B. Damnum Absque Unjuria
1. The Orchard & Country Club, Inc. v. Yuhico, G.R. No. 191033,
January 11, 2016
C. Substitute Parental Authority
1. Caravan Travel and Tours Intemational, Inc. v. Abejar, G.R. No.
170631, February 10, 2016
2. Rosaldes v. People, G.R. No. 173988, October 8, 2014
Persons liable
1
fae
Filcar Transport Services v. Espinas, G.R. No. 174156, June 20,
2012
St. Josephs College v. Miranda, G.R. No. 182353, June 29, 2010 —
Special Parental Authority
Del Carmen Jr., v. Bacoy, G.R. No. 173870, April 25, 2012
Syki v. Begasa, G.R. No. 149149. October 23, 2003
Caravan Travel and Tours International, Inc. v. Abejar, G.R. No.
170631, February 10, 2016- Employer's liability
Degree of Diligence
1
Far East Bank and Trust Company v. Tentmakers Group, Inc., G.R.
No. 171050, July 4, 2012
Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur
1
2.
3.
FGU Insurance Corporation v. G.P. Sarmiento Trucking
Corporation, G.R. No. 141910. August 6, 2002
Peria Compania de Seguros v. Sps Sarangaya, G.R. No. 147746,
October 25, 2005
When not applicableVill. No Double Recovery Rule ~ Art. 2177, NCC
1. Rafael Reyes Trucking Corporation v. People, G.R. No. 129029,
April 3, 2000
2. Equitable Leasing Corporation v. Suyom, G.R. No. 143360,
September 5, 2002
IX. Negligence — Assignment #2
A. Definition
1. Mendoza v. Gomez, G.R. No. 160110, June 18, 2014
2. Makati Shangri-La Hotel v. Harper, G.R. No. 189998, August 29,
2012
3. Smith Bell Dodwell Shipping Agency Corporation v. Borja, G.R. No.
143008. June 10, 2002
Test of Negligence
1. Alano v. Magud-Logmao, G.R. No. 175540, April 7, 2014
C. Presumption of Negligence - Arts. 2184, 2185 and Art. 2188, NCC
1. GreenStar Express, Inc. v. Universal Robina Corporation, G.R. No.
205090, October 17, 2016
2. Raynera, et. al v. Orpilla, G.R. No. 120027, April 21, 1999
3. Picart v. Smith, G.R. No. L-12219, March 15, 1918
D. Circumstances to Consider in determining Negligence
1. Time and Place
2. Emergency Rule
1. Engada v. CA, G.R. No. 140698, June 20,2003
2. Valenzuela v. CA, G.R. No. 115024, February 7, 1996
3. Gravity of Harm to be avoided
4. Alternative course of action
5. Social or utility of Activity
E. Proof of Negligence
1. Burden of Proof
w
F. Defenses
1. Assumption of Risk
1. Requisites
2. Kinds
2. Prescription
i. Cerezo v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Company, G.R. No. L-10107,
February 4, 1916
ii, Jimmy Co v. CA, G.R. No. 124922, June 22, 1998
3. Plaintiffs own conduct
4. Fortuitous Event
1. Mariano, Jr. v. Callejas, G.R. No. 166840, July 31, 2009
2. College Assurance Plan v. Belfranit Development Inc., G.R.
No. 185604, November 22, 20075. Contributory Negligence
1. Travel & Tours Advisers, Inc. v. Cruz, G.R. No. 199282,
March 14, 2016
2. Sps. Vergara v. Torrecampo Sonkin, G.R. No. 193659,
June 15, 2015,
3. Dumayag v. People, G.R. No. 172778, November 26, 2012
4, Philippine National Bank v. F.F. Cruz, G.R. No. 173259, July
25, 2011
6. Last Clear Chance
Assignment #3
x.
Xi.
Xi.
‘Standard of Conduct: Good Father of a Family — (Art. 1163, NCC)
Affirmative Duties and Miscellaneous Activities
A. Nature of Misfeasance and Nonfeasance
1. Duty to Rescue
2. Duty to Rescuer
B. Owners, Proprietors and Possessors
1. Trespassers
2. Tolerated Possessor
3. Visitors
4. Children and Attractive Nuisance Rule
5. State of Necessity
6. Liability to Neighbors and Third Persons
7. Liability of Proprietors of Buildings
C. Employers and Employees
1. Employers
2. Employees
Malpractice
A. Medical Malpractice
1. Standard of care
2. General practitioners v. specialists
3. Locality Rule
4. Neighborhood Rule
5. Cases:
1. Liv. Sps. Soliman, G.R. No. 165279, June 7, 2011
2. Cayao-Lasam v. Sps. Ramolete, GR. No. 159132,
December 18, 2008
3. Professional Services, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 126297, February 2,
2010
B. Res Ipsa Loguitur
1. Bastan v. People, G.R. No. 187926, February 15, 2012
2. Ramos v. CA, G.R. No. 124354, December 29, 1999Xxill.
XIV.
. Lost Chance Rule
Doctrine of Informed Consent
Captain of the Ship Doctrine
1. Professional Services, Inc. v. Agana, G.R. No. 126297, January 31,
2007
F. Liability of Hospitals
1. Vicarious Liability
2. Doctrine of Corporate Responsibility
. Nurses
Pharmacists
Negligence of Lawyers
Accountants and Auditors
moo
erie
Causation
Proximate Cause
Cause-in-fact tests
Substantial factor test
. NESS Test
First Stage Only
1. Mendoza v. Sps. Gomez, G.R. No. 160110, June 18, 2014
2. Philippine National Railways v. Vizcara, G.R. No. 190022, February
45, 2012
3. People v. Villacorta, G.R. No. 186412, September 7, 2011
4. Guianio v. Makati Shangri-la Hotel, G.R. No. 190601, February 7,
2011
5. Ramos v. C.O.L. Realty Corporation, G.R. No. 184905, August 28,
2009
F. Tests of Proximate Cause
1. Efficient and Intervening Cause
1. Universal international Investment (BVI) Ltd v. Ray Burton
G.R. No. 182201, November 14, 2016
2. People v. Acuram, G.R. No. 117954, April 27, 2000
moom>
END OF SCOPE FOR MIDTERMS
Vicarious Liability - Assignment #4
A. Doctrine of Respondeat Superior
B. Parents and other Persons Exercising Parental Authority
1. Liability for Acts of Minors
2. Liability for Acts of Children of Majority Age
C. Liability of Guardians of Incapacitated Adults
D. Schools, Teachers and Administrators
1. Under the Family Code