Episode 1

I believe in you. Because it’s me, I can Arguing in Circle

believe you.

Have you fallen for that guy? Is your heart Question-Begging Language or Complex
an automatic door or what?It opens up question?
before anyone even knocks on it.

Look at this mess. Analogical statement

It’s totally looks like a pigsty.
I can even eat pork because pigs remind
me of you.

If I let my guard down, neighbor will turn Conditional Statement

into a friend, then a friend will become a
boyfriend

I saw you in my dream. What I see in my False analogy

dreams always comes true, so if you want
to live it’s complete non sense. Even my
dad passed like that because he didn’t
believe me. The future is unchangeable.
Knowing what will happen changes
nothing.

Sir, you will die if you smoke Conditional Statement

People no longer give out rice cakes when Appeal to Ages

they move. It's old-fashioned. It's not
old-fashioned. It's a way to show kindness.
What I see in my dreams always comes Appeal to Force
true,
so if you want to live, you must listen to me
no matter what.

Episode 2

February 14, 2016, on your way home in Complex Question

your mother’s cars, you hit Mr. Han Woo Leading Question
Tak at an intersection in Sanggu-dong with
the car and killed him. Correct?

All the evidence points to you. False dilemma

Admitting it will be the best for your sake
because it can be recognized as mitigating
sentence factor.

The victim's family is demanding False dilemma

punishment for you. Continuing to deny it
might act as an aggravating factor that
increases your sentence.

If something happens to you because of Conditional Statement

me, I won’t be able to go on with my life

Hadn’t I done what I did, you would’ve Conditional Statement

killed a person

Episode 3

When you stop the running water, it diverts Analogical Statement

its course. You stop thing from happening
just like stopping the running water. Time
will flow differently.
I don’t believe in you words. I don’t want to Fallacy of exclusive premises
believe it. I will never believe it even if I
dream the same thing again.

I don’t care who dies in my dream. I’ll have Fallacy of exclusive premises
to save whoever is dying. If I can’t do that,
I’ll have to blame myself endlessly.

I can’t handle that. Can you handle that? If Fallacy of exclusive premises
you can’t, ignore all your dreams as if they
never happened.

You know what comes next if you get Fallacy of leading question
charged with assault, right?

I might die if I lose weight. Conditional Statement

I only hugged you because you hugged Explanation

me first.

If you can’t handle it, ignore all your dream Conditional Statement

Episode 4

My dad will never be put on trial because Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (Arguing from
prosecutors are dumb and lawyers are sly. Ignorance)

It's a crime that can be punished if the Conditional syllogism

victim approves of it. So if the victim does
not want the assaulter to be punished,
there's nothing that stupid prosecutor can
do.
The crime will disappear.

First of all, why did you flirt with my

girlfriend and tell her to stop seeing me?
Second. Why did you bump into my car?
Third. Why are you bothering me with a
case that's so obvious? But I think those
three incidents lead to one reason. You're
taking a revenge.
Episode 5

If we can alter those seemingly Conditional statement

insignificant choices, we might be able to
prevent such cruel moments

All prosecutors are stupid. Hasty generalization

The injured party does not wish the ?????????????Modus ponens?

accused to be punished. Therefore, the
case in unprosecutable.

Episode 6

Know with whom you’re dealing with if you Conditional statement

want to bluff away.

Burns can get infected if they're not treated Conditional Statement

properly.

If I insist on re-investigating this obvious Conditional Statement

case, I'll get transferred to some faraway
place.

At times, fighting for justice and helping Appeal to pity

the weak can clash. As in the Park Jun Mo
case. In many domestic abuse cases,
arresting the husband who is the
breadwinner results in the rest of the
family having to struggle to sustain
themselves.

I’d make the same decision even if I were Conditional statement

to go back.

In many domestic abuse cases, arresting Hasty generalization

the husband who is the breadwinner
results in the rest of the family struggling to
sustain themselves.
You put up a tough front, but you’re not Fallacy of Personal Attack
strong at all. You seem like a nice girl, yet
you say mean things.

Episode 7

I’ll slip out of my old skin and become a Fallacy of false analogy
new man. You know humans don’t slip out
of their own skins, only snakes do. Snakes
become bigger and creepier as they slip
out of their old skins.

I'm a lawyer who used to be a prosecutor. I Circumstantial

dealt with many similar cases when I was
a prosecutor. At first, I wanted to get better
performance reviews,so I always
prosecuted the offenders. Just like
Prosecutor Jung Jae Chan. But I've
changed.

If this case is put on a trial, Mr. Park will Fallacy of false dilemma
stop supporting you financially right
away.So Yoon's career as a pianist and
major competitions will all be gone. Your
daughter will lose her talent, future, and
everything else

Episode 8

I’m giving him a choice to either jump off a False Dilemma

broken car or kill himself in it.

You haven't investigated on Park Jun Mo Exclusive premises

yet, have you? I haven't. - When you
investigate him later,don't do it yourself.
Make the investigator do it

It says there that if he hits his wife Conditional statement

again,he'll give her 100 million dollars
The foot size alone can determine Inductive generalization
someone's sentence

I think you have taken the wrong path. If Appeal to force

you keep lying with the fabricated
evidence, they may work against you later.

Your attitude of answering questions Inductive generalization

here,fabricating the medical record and
CCTV footage...have made this case even
bigger

Your attitude during the investigation will Inductive generalization

determine whether you'll be sentenced
and by how much.

Episode 9

If this was a contagious disease, you'd be Hypothetical statement

the first infectee,
but it's obviously not spread through air or
physical contact.
Had it been the case, a lot more people
would've been infected.

We should master a foreign language in Conditional statement

order to prevent such disasters at an
international level.

Such accidents are considered crimes of

criminal negligence.
Since it was a mistake, aiding or abetting it
was simply impossible. Therefore, we
cannot accuse him of such an offense

Driving under the influence of alcohol can Inductive generalization

lead to accidents
In this country, respecting elders is Appeal to ages
considered a virtue. We must treat our
superiors with respect. Wait. Why are you
talking about respecting elders and
superiors? That's one of Confucius'
teachings.

Only 20 percent of Korea's population is Hasty generalization

Christian. It means that the probability of
all four of you being Christian is 0.2 to the
power of 4, which equals 0.0016. It's less
than the probability of seeing a double
rainbow.In other words, it's impossible.