Ech485 Clinical Practice Evaluation 4 Original - Wright Asja

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Asja Wright 20192512

STUDENT NAME___________________________________ STUDENT NUMBER ____________________________
Bachelor of Science in Early Childhood Education

PROGRAM: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ECH-485 2/26/2018 4/29/2018

COURSE: ________________________________________START DATE: END DATE:________________________
Montebello School
COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
Arizona
SCHOOL STATE:
Maria Montenegro
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME:_____________________________________________________________________________________
Christine Tax
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: _____________________________________________________________________________________________
FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 4
TOTAL POINTS 0 points 100 %
42.00 4200 4200
300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
300
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Not Applicable Unacceptable Acceptable Target
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
The performance of the teacher The performance of the teacher The disposition is frequently The disposition is constantly
candidate did not involve the candidate is contrary to the observed through the performance observed through the
disposition. disposition and does not meet the of the teacher candidate and meets performance of the teacher
expectations for a student teacher. expectations for a student teacher. candidate and consistently
exceeds expectations for a
student teacher.
High Expectations Score N/A

Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations
for student success. These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 100 1.00
Comments
Ms. Asja believes all students are capable of learning. She allows space for students to learn at their pace and at their level. Ms. Asja has high expectations of all students, and she is sure to modify the
expectations according to student outcomes.
Respect for the Diversity of Others Score N/A

Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the
cultural diversity of the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by
respect for others. They should interact with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other 100 1.00
community members with courtesy and civility and establish relationships characterized by respect and
rapport.
Comments
Asja was always respectful of others including children, staff and parents. She was respectful of her students and their disagreements, and she guided them to come to an agreement allowing them to
be friends.
2


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Fairness Score N/A

Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality,
and exercise fairness in all areas including assessment.
100 1.00
Comments
Ms. Asja never demonstrated favoritism to any of the students. She was always fair in the ways she communicated with the students. She also used rubrics to help her guide and grade assessments.
Professional Conduct Score N/A

Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model
within their community. 100 1.00
Comments
Ms. Asja was always ethical with regards to students, staff and parents. She remained a positive role model for students and parents.
3


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Reflection Score N/A

Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a
professional. Educators should be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek 1.00
continual improvement.
100
Comments
In the time Ms. Asja spent in the classroom, she was very reflective of her day to day practice. She acknowledges strengths in her practice and she seeks advice to improve her weakness.
Curiosity Score N/A

Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
1.00
100
Comments
Throughout various lessons, Ms. Asja was able to ignite children’s curiosity by asking appropriate questions, providing background information on new topics, and having real life connections when
available
4


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Honesty Score N/A

Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
100 1.00
Comments
Ms. Asja demonstrated this standard 100% of the time. At least two times in the time spent in this class, Ms. Asja had the opportunity to addressed honesty with the students. She talked about the
importance of honesty and explained how honesty affects them.
Compassion Score N/A

Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their
relationships with others while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 1.00
100
Comments
Ms. Asja demonstrated compassion and professionalism throughout the time spent at Montebello. She was warmth and friendly to all the students she encountered.
5
Asja
Asja Wright
Wright 20192512
20192512

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Advocacy Score N/A

Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the
welfare of others in the educational setting. 1.00
100
Comments
Ms. Asja demonstrated the importance of community involvement and when it was appropriate, she participated in meetings that promoted advocacy towards the students.
Dedication Score N/A

Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
100 1.00
Comments
Soon after Ms. Asja took over the classroom, she demonstrated her dedication to teaching by coming to class well prepared and ready to teach.
6

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
The performance of the teacher The performance of the teacher The performance of the teacher The performance of the teacher
candidate did not involve the candidate is contrary to the standard candidate is frequently observed candidate is constantly
standard. and does not meet the expectations and meets expectations for a observed and consistently
for a student teacher. student teacher. exceeds expectations for a
student teacher.
Standard 1: Student Development Score N/A

1.1
Teacher candidates create developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual 1.00
students’ strengths, interests, and needs and enables each student to advance and accelerate his or her
100
learning.
1.2
Teacher candidates collaborate with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote 100 1.00
student growth and development.
Comments
Ms. Asja continues to create lesson plans that are student centered. She led lessons that allowed students to show their strengths and interests. Ms. Asja collaborates with
families and with colleagues when it is appropriate. She made positive phone calls and spoke with parents about the children’s strengths and interests.
7


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 2: Learning Differences Score N/A

2.1
Teacher candidates design, adapt, and deliver instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths 100 1.00
and needs and create opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning in different ways.
2.2
Teacher candidates incorporate language development tools into planning and instruction, including strategies 1.00
for making content accessible to English language students and for evaluating and supporting their
100
development of English proficiency.
2.3
Teacher candidates access resources, supports, specialized assistance and services to meet particular 100 1.00
learning differences or needs.
Comments
Through out her time in the classroom, Ms. Asja provided lessons in which, different learning styles were introduced. TPR, music, videos, and little chants are few of the
strategies Ms. Asja provided for the students. Ms. Asja is sure to check all the resources that are available for instruction and she incorporates as much of them as they are
needed in her daily lessons.
8


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
The performance of the teacher The performance of the teacher The performance of the teacher The performance of the
candidate did not involve the candidate is contrary to the candidate is frequently observed teacher candidate is constantly
standard. standard and does not meet the and meets expectations for a observed and consistently
expectations for a student teacher. student teacher. exceeds expectations for a
student teacher.
Standard 3: Learning Environments Score N/A

3.1
Teacher candidates manage the learning environment to actively and equitably engage students by 100 1.00
organizing, allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and students’ attention.
3.2
Teacher candidates communicate verbally and nonverbally in ways that demonstrate respect for and
responsiveness to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspectives students bring to the learning
100 1.00
environment.
Comments
Ms. Asja has gradually improved her organizational skills with regards to student’s engagement. She is also gaining strength in communicating with the class was she needs
in order for all of them to have a positive experience while they are learning.
9


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
candidate did not involve the candidate is contrary to the candidate is frequently observed teacher candidate is
standard. standard and does not meet the and meets expectations for a constantly observed and
expectations for a student teacher. student teacher. consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher.
Standard 4: Content Knowledge Score N/A

4.1
Teacher candidates stimulate student reflection on prior content knowledge, link new concepts to familiar 100 1.00
concepts, and make connections to students’ experiences.
4.2
Teacher candidates use supplementary resources and technologies effectively to ensure accessibility and 100 1.00
relevance for all students.
4.3
Teacher candidates create opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in 100 1.00
their content area.
Comments
Ms. Asja has improved in linking new concepts to familiar concepts. She learns from suggestions given by me the “cooperating teacher”. Ms. Asja had access and used
supplementary resources and technology with all her lessons. Ms. Asja did provide ample opportunities for students to learn and practice new academic language.
10


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 5: Application of Content Score N/A

5.1
Teacher candidates engage students in applying content knowledge to real-world problems through the lens 100 1.00
of interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy).
5.2
Teacher candidates facilitate students’ ability to develop diverse social and cultural perspectives that expand 100 1.00
their understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to solving problems.
Comments
When it is appropriate, Ms. Asja does provide opportunities for students to engage in real-world problems.
11


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 6: Assessment Score N/A

6.1
Teacher candidates design assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and 100 1.00
minimize sources of bias that can distort assessment results.
6.2
Teacher candidates work independently and collaboratively to examine test and other performance data to 100 1.00
understand each student’s progress and to guide planning.
6.3
Teacher candidates prepare all students for the demands of particular assessment formats and make 1
appropriate modifications in assessments or testing conditions especially for students with disabilities and
100
language learning needs.
Comments
Ms. Asja did provide assessments that matched the learning objectives. She was able to examine the data from assessment and determine the next steps a child needed to
improve in any given subject.
12


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 7: Planning for Instruction Score N/A

7.1
Teacher candidates plan how to achieve each student’s learning goals, choosing appropriate strategies and 100 1.00
accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for individuals and groups of students.
7.2
Teacher candidates develop appropriate sequencing of learning experiences and provide multiple ways to 100 1.00
demonstrate knowledge and skill.
7.3
Teacher candidates plan for instruction based on formative and summative assessment data, prior student 100 1.00
knowledge, and student interest.
Comments
Ms. Asja plans lesson plans that allow each student to reach their personal goal at different levels. Ms. Asja scaffolds support and accommodations as the students need the
help.
13


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 8: Instructional Strategies Score N/A

8.1
Teacher candidates vary their role in the instructional process (e.g., instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in 100 1.00
relation to the content, purpose of instruction, and student needs
8.2
Teacher candidates engage students in using a range of learning skills and technology tools to access, 100 1.00
interpret, evaluate, and apply information.
8.3
Teacher candidates ask questions to stimulate discussion that serve different purposes (e.g., probing for
student understanding, helping students articulate their ideas and thinking processes, stimulating curiosity,
100 1.00
and helping students to question).
Comments
Ms. Asja was thoughtful of the questions she would have for the students. She worked her way into partner discussions and continues to improve the guidance she provides
to partners. The more she feels confident in classroom discussion, the stronger she will be.
14


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score N/A

9.1
Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, teacher candidates use a variety of data (e.g., systematic 1.00
observation, information about students, and research) to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning
100
and to adapt planning and practice.
9.2
Teacher candidates actively seek professional, community, and technological resources, within and outside 100 1.00
the school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and problem solving.
Comments
Ms. Asja worked side to side to review and interpret various data pieces. When it was appropriate, she would provide her understanding of the student data. Ms. Asja was
very careful to think of ways in which she could seek professional support to improve her teaching skills.
15


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration Score N/A

10.1
Teacher candidates use technological tools and a variety of communication strategies to build local and 100 1.00
global learning communities that engage students, families, and colleagues.
10.2
Teacher candidates advocate to meet the needs of students, to strengthen the learning environment, and to 100 1.00
enact system change.
Comments
16

Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) Standards

Instructions Please use the chart below to determine the required SPA standards for your Teacher Candidate’s program of study. If your
Teacher Candidate’s program is not included below, the evaluation of SPA standards are not required.
Program Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) Pages
Dance NASD National Association of Schools of Dance 18-23
Early Childhood NAEYC National Association for the Education of Young Children 24-27
Early Childhood and Early Childhood Special Education NAEYC National Association for the Education of Young Children 24-27
CEC Council for Exceptional Children 28-31
Elementary ACEI Association of Childhood Education International 32-39
Elementary (ESL Emphasis) ACEI Association of Childhood Education International 32-39

TESOL Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages 40-45
Elementary and Special Education ACEI Association of Childhood Education International 32-39
CEC Council for Exceptional Children 28-31
Music NASM National Association of Schools of Music 46-53
Secondary- Business NBEA National Business Education Association 54-60
Secondary- English NCTE National Council of Teachers of English 61-62
Secondary- History NCSS National Council for the Social Studies 63-67
Secondary- Math NCTM National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 68-75

Secondary- Physical Education SHAPE Society of Health and Physical Educators- America 76-78
Secondary- Science NSTA National Science Teachers Association 79-83
Special Education CEC Council for Exceptional Children 28-31
Theatre NAST National Association of Schools of Theatre 84-87
17

Dance Placements: National Association of Schools of Dance (NASD) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASD 3a Score N/A
✔
Ability to teach dance at various levels to different age groups and in a variety of classroom, studio, and
ensemble settings in ways that develop knowledge of how dance works syntactically as a communication
0
medium and developmentally as an agent of civilization. This set of abilities includes effective classroom, studio,
and rehearsal management.
Comments
NASD 3b Score N/A
✔
An understanding of child growth and development and an understanding of principles of learning as they relate
to dance.
0
Comments
18


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASD 3c Score N/A
✔
The ability to assess aptitudes, experiential backgrounds, orientations of individuals and groups of students, and
the nature of subject matter, and to plan educational programs to meet assessed needs. 0
Comments
NASD 3d Score N/A
✔
Knowledge of current methods, materials, and repertories available in various fields and levels of dance
education appropriate to the teaching specialization.
0
Comments
19


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASD 3e Score N/A

The ability to accept, amend, or reject methods and materials based on personal assessment of specific teaching
situations. 0
Comments
NASD 3f Score N/A
✔
Basic understanding of the principles and methods of developing curricula and the short- and long-term units
that comprise them.
0
Comments
20


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASD 3g Score N/A
✔
An understanding of evaluative techniques and ability to apply them in assessing both the progress of students in
dance and the objectives and procedures of the curriculum.
0
Comments
NASD 5a Score N/A
✔
Students should engage in observation and discussion of field-based teaching/learning experiences in diverse
settings
0
Comments
21


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASD 5b Score N/A
✔
Students should be provided opportunities for various types of teaching and directed observation throughout
the degree program.
0
Comments
NASD 5c Score N/A
✔
Teaching opportunities should be provided in actual pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, elementary, middle, and
secondary settings, as appropriate for the student’s certification level.
0
Comments
22


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASD 5d Score N/A
✔
The choice of practice teaching sites must enable students to develop competencies consistent with standards
outlined above, and must be approved by qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution. 0
Comments
NASD 5e Score N/A
✔
Sites and situations for student teaching and students must be supervised by qualified dance personnel from the
degree-granting institution and, when possible, the cooperating schools. 0
Comments
23

Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)
Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAEYC Standard 1: Promoting Child Development and Learning Score N/A

Students prepared in early childhood degree programs are grounded in a child development knowledge base.
They use their understanding of young children’s characteristics and needs and of the multiple interacting 1
influences on children’s development and learning to create environments that are healthy, respectful,
100
supportive, and challenging for each child.
Comments
NAEYC Standard 2: Building Family and Community Relationships Score N/A

Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that successful early childhood education
depends upon partnerships with children’s families and communities. They know about, understand, and value
the importance and complex characteristics of children’s families and communities. They use this understanding 100 1
to create respectful, reciprocal relationships that support and empower families and to involve all families in their
children’s development and learning.
Comments
24

Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAEYC Standard 3: Observing, Documenting, and Assessing to Support Young Children and Score N/A
Families
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that child observations, documentation, and other forms
of assessment are central to the practice of all early childhood professionals. They know about and understand the goals,
benefits, and uses of assessment. They know about and use systematic observations, documentation, and other effective 100 1
assessment strategies in a responsible way, in partnership with families and other professionals, to positively influence the
development of every child.
Comments
NAEYC Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches to Connect with Children and Score N/A
Families
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that teaching and learning with young children is a
complex enterprise, and its details vary depending on children’s ages, characteristics, and the settings within which teaching
and learning occur. They understand and use positive relationships and supportive interactions as the foundation for their 1
work with young children and families. Students know, understand, and use a wide array of developmentally appropriate 100
approaches, instructional strategies, and tools to connect with children and families and positively influence each child’s
development and learning.
Comments
25

Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAEYC Standard 5: Using Content Knowledge to Build Meaningful Curriculum Score N/A
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs use their knowledge of academic disciplines to design, implement,
and evaluate experiences that promote positive development and learning for each and every young child. Students
understand the importance of developmental domains and academic (or content) disciplines in an early childhood
1
curriculum. They know the essential concepts, inquiry tools, and structure of content areas, including academic subjects, 100
and can identify resources to deepen their understanding. Students use their own knowledge and other resources to design,
implement, and evaluate meaningful, challenging curricula that promote comprehensive developmental and learning
outcomes for every young child.
Comments
NAEYC Standard 6: Becoming a Professional Score N/A

Students prepared in early childhood degree programs identify and conduct themselves as members of the early childhood
profession. They know and use ethical guidelines and other professional standards related to early childhood practice. They
are continuous, collaborative learners who demonstrate knowledgeable, reflective, and critical perspectives on their work, 100 1
making informed decisions that integrate knowledge from a variety of sources. They are informed advocates for sound
educational practices and policies.
Comments
26

Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAEYC Standard 7: Early Childhood Experience Score N/A

Field experiences and clinical practice are planned and sequenced so that candidates develop the knowledge,
skills, and professional dispositions necessary to promote the development and learning of young children across
the entire developmental period of early childhood – in at least two of the three early childhood age groups (birth 100 1
– age 3, 3 through 5, 5 through 8 years) and in the variety of settings that offer early education (early school
grades, child care centers and homes, Head Start programs).
Comments
27

Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
N/A 0 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
CEC Standard 1: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals understand how exceptionalities may interact with development and
learning and use this knowledge to provide meaningful and challenging learning experiences for individuals with 0
exceptionalities.
Comments
CEC Standard 2: Learning Environments Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments so
that individuals with exceptionalities become active and effective learners and develop emotional well-being, 0
positive social interactions, and self-determination.
Comments
28

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
CEC Standard 3: Curricular Content Knowledge Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of general and specialized curricula to individualize
learning for individuals with exceptionalities. 0
Comments
CEC Standard 4: Assessment Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals use multiple methods of assessment and data sources in making
educational decisions.
0
Comments
29

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
CEC Standard 5: Instructional Planning and Strategies Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals select, adapt, and use a repertoire of evidence-based instructional
strategies to advance learning of individuals with exceptionalities. 0
Comments
CEC Standard 6: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals use foundational knowledge of the field and their professional ethical
principles and practice standards to inform special education practice, to engage in lifelong learning, and to 0
advance the profession.
Comments
30

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
CEC Standard 7: Collaboration Score N/A
✔
Beginning special education professionals collaborate with families, other educators, related service providers,
individuals with exceptionalities, and personnel from community agencies in culturally responsive ways to 0
address the needs of individuals with exceptionalities across a range of learning experiences.
Comments
31

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 1: Development, Learning, and Motivation Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to
development of children and young adolescents to construct learning opportunities that support individual 0
students’ development, acquisition of knowledge, and motivation.
Comments
ACEI Standard 2.1: Reading, Writing, and Oral Language Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate a high level of competence in the use of English language arts and they know,
understand, and use concepts from reading, language and child development, to teach reading, writing, speaking, 0
viewing, listening, and thinking skills and to help students successfully apply their developing skills to many
different situations, materials, and ideas.
Comments
32

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 2.2: Science Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use fundamental concepts of physical, life, and earth/ space sciences.
Candidates can design and implement age-appropriate inquiry lessons to teach science, to build student 0
understanding for personal and social applications, and to convey the nature of science.
Comments
ACEI Standard 2.3: Mathematics Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts and procedures that define number and operations,
algebra, geometry, measurement, and data analysis and probability. In doing so they consistently engage
0
problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and representation.
Comments
33

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 2.4: Social Studies Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts and modes of inquiry from the social studies—the
integrated study of history, geography, the social sciences, and other related areas—to promote elementary 0
students’ abilities to make informed decisions as citizens of a culturally diverse democratic society and
interdependent world.
Comments
ACEI Standard 2.5: The Arts Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use—as appropriate to their own understanding and skills—the content,
functions, and achievements of the performing arts (dance, music, theater) and the visual arts as primary media 0
for communication, inquiry, and engagement among elementary students.
Comments
34

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 2.6: Health Education Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts in the subject matter of health education to create
opportunities for student development and practice of skills that contribute to good health. 0
Comments
ACEI Standard 2.7: Physical Education Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use—as appropriate to their own understanding and skills—human
movement and physical activity as central elements to foster active, healthy life styles and enhanced quality of life 0
for elementary students.
Comments
35

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 3.1: Integrating and Applying Knowledge for Instruction Score N/A
✔
Candidates plan and implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, connections across
the curriculum, curricular goals, and community 0
Comments
ACEI Standard 3.2: Adaptation to Diverse Students Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use—as appropriate to their own understanding and skills—human
movement and physical activity as central elements to foster active, healthy life styles and enhanced quality of life 0
for elementary students.
Comments
36

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 3.3: Development of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Score N/A
✔
Candidates understand and use a variety of teaching strategies that encourage elementary students’
development of critical thinking and problem solving. 0
Comments
ACEI Standard 3.4: Active Engagement in Learning Score N/A
✔
Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior among
students at the K-6 level to foster active engagement in learning, self-motivation, and positive social interaction 0
and to create supportive learning environments.
Comments
37

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 3.5: Communication to Foster Collaboration Score N/A
✔
Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication
techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the elementary classroom. 0
Comments
ACEI Standard 4: Assessment for Instruction Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use formal and informal assessment strategies to plan, evaluate and
strengthen instruction that will promote continuous intellectual, social, emotional, and physical development of 0
each elementary student.
Comments
38

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
ACEI Standard 5.1: Professional Growth, Reflection And Evaluation Score N/A
✔
Candidates are aware of and reflect on their practice in light of research on teaching, professional ethics, and
resources available for professional learning; they continually evaluate the effects of their professional decisions 0
and actions on students, families, and other professionals in the learning community and actively seek out
opportunities to grow professionally.
Comments
39

Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 1.a. Language as a System Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate understanding of language as a system, including phonology, morphology, syntax,
pragmatics and semantics, and support ELLs as they acquire English language and literacy in order to achieve in 0
the content areas.
Comments
Standard 1.b. Language Acquisition and Development Score N/A
✔
Candidates understand and apply theories and research in language acquisition and development to support
their ELLs English language and literacy learning and content-area achievement. 0
Comments
40

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 2. Culture as It Affects Student Learning Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and use major theories and research related to the nature and role of culture in
their instruction. They demonstrate understanding of how cultural groups and individual cultural identities affect 0
language learning and school achievement.
Comments
Standard 3.a. Planning for Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and apply concepts, research, and best practices to plan classroom instruction in
a supportive learning environment for ELLs. They plan for multilevel classrooms with learners from diverse
0
backgrounds using standards-based ESL and content curriculum.
Comments
41

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 3.b. Implementing and Managing Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, manage, and implement a variety of standards-based teaching strategies and techniques for
developing and integrating English listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Candidates support ELLs access to 0
the core curriculum by teaching language through academic content.
Comments
Standard 3.c. Using Resources and Technology Effectively in ESL and Content Instruction Score N/A
✔
Candidates are familiar with a wide range of standards-based materials, resources, and technologies, and
choose, adapt, and use them in effective ESL and content teaching. 0
Comments
42

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 4.a. Issues of Assessment for English Language Learners Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate understanding of various assessment issues as they affect ELLs, such as accountability,
bias, special education testing, language proficiency, and accommodations in formal testing situations. 0
Comments
Standard 4.b. Language Proficiency Assessment Score N/A
✔
Candidates know and can use a variety of standards-based language proficiency instruments to show language
growth and to inform their instruction. They demonstrate understanding of their uses for identification, 0
placement, and reclassification of ELLs.
Comments
43

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 4.c. Classroom-Based Assessment for ESL Score N/A
✔
Candidates know and can use a variety of performance-based assessment tools and techniques to inform
instruction in the classroom.
0
Comments
Standard 5.a. ESL Research and History Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of history, research, educational public policy, and current practice in the
field of ESL teaching and apply this knowledge to inform teaching and learning.
0
Comments
44

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 5.b. Professional Development, Partnerships, and Advocacy Score N/A
✔
Candidates take advantage of professional growth opportunities and demonstrate the ability to build
partnerships with colleagues and students’ families, serve as community resources, and advocate for ELLs. 0
Comments
45

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NASM Standard 6 a: General Studies Score N/A
✔
a. Candidates are expected to have the ability to think, speak, and write clearly and effectively.
0
Comments
✔
b. Candidates are expected to have an informed acquaintance with fields of study beyond music such as those in
the arts and humanities, the natural and physical sciences, and the social sciences. 0
Comments
46


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
c. Candidates are expected to have a functional awareness of the differences and commonalities regarding
work in artistic, scientific, and humanistic domains. 0
Comments
✔
d. Candidates are expected to have awareness that multiple disciplinary perspectives and techniques are
available to consider all issues and responsibilities including, but not limited to, history, culture, moral and ethical
0
issues, and decision-making
Comments
47


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score N/A
✔
Students must acquire:
a. Technical skills requisite for artistic self-expression in at least one major performance area at a level 0
appropriate for the particular music concentration.
Comments
✔
b. An overview understanding of the repertory in their major performance area and the ability to perform from a 0
cross-section of that repertory.
Comments
48


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
c. The ability to read at sight with fluency demonstrating both general musicianship and, in the major
performance area, a level of skill relevant to professional standards appropriate for the particular music 0
concentration.
Comments
✔
d. Knowledge and skills sufficient to work as a leader and in collaboration on matters of musical interpretation.
0
Rehearsal and conducting skills are required as appropriate to the particular music concentration.
Comments
49


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
e. Keyboard competency. 0
Comments
✔
f. Growth in artistry, technical skills, collaborative competence and knowledge of repertory through regular
0
ensemble experiences. Ensembles should be varied both in size and nature.
Comments
50


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard B 2: Musicianship Skills and Analysis Score N/A
✔
a. An understanding of the common elements and organizational patterns of music and their interaction, the 0
ability to employ this understanding in aural, verbal, and visual analyses, and the ability to take aural dictation.
Comments
✔
b. Sufficient understanding of and capability with musical forms, processes, and structures to use this knowledge
0
and skill in compositional, performance, analytical, scholarly, and pedagogical applications according to the
requisites of their specializations.
Comments
51


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
c. The ability to place music in historical, cultural, and stylistic contexts. 0
Comments
Standard B 3: Composition/Improvisation Score N/A

Students must acquire a rudimentary capacity to create original or derivative music. It is the prerogative of each institution
✔
to develop specific requirements regarding written, electronic, or improvisatory forms and methods. These may include, but
are not limited to, the creation of original compositions or improvisations, variations, or improvisations on existing materials,
experimentation with various sound sources, the imitation of musical styles, and manipulating the common elements in non- 0
traditional ways. Institutional requirements should help students gain a basic understanding of how to work freely and
cogently with musical materials in various composition-based activities, particularly those most associated with the major
field.
Comments
52


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard B 4: History and Repertory Score N/A
✔
Students must acquire basic knowledge of music history and repertories through the present time, including
study and experience of musical language and achievement in addition to that of the primary culture 0
encompassing the area of specialization (see Standards III.L.).
Comments
Standard B 5: Synthesis Score N/A
✔
While synthesis is a lifetime process, by the end of undergraduate study students must be able to work on musical
problems by combining, as appropriate to the issue, their capabilities in performance; aural, verbal, and visual
0
analysis; composition/improvisation; and history and repertory.
Comments
53

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
The performance of the teacher candidate The performance of the teacher candidate is The performance of the teacher candidate The performance of the teacher
did not involve the standard. contrary to the standard and does not meet is frequently observed and meets candidate is constantly observed and
the expectations for a student teacher. expectations for a student teacher. consistently exceeds expectations for a
student teacher.
Standard 1: Professionalism Score N/A
1.1 Prospective business teachers reflect on and continually evaluates the effects of his or her choices and actions on others and actively
seeks out opportunities for personal and professional growth. ✔ 0
1.2 Prospective business teachers care deeply about students, colleagues, the business educations discipline, and the teaching
profession. ✔ 0
✔
1.3 Prospective business teachers embrace teaching as lifelong learning to model best practices in instruction.
0
✔
1.4 Prospective business teachers participates actively in professional organizations at all levels and seeks opportunities to serve in
leadership and advocacy roles. 0
1.5 Prospective business teachers contribute to the well-being of the school, school district, and community.
✔ 0
1.6 Prospective business teachers move beyond the boundaries of the classroom to assume responsibility as an advocate and promoter
of the profession in the community, state, and nation. ✔ 0
✔
1.7 Prospective business teachers projects a positive professional image that personifies the discipline itself and exemplifies the goals and
ideals of the profession. 0
✔
1.8 Prospective business teachers base all interaction on principles of respect, fairness, and ethics.
0
1.9 Prospective business teachers articulates the importance of professional standards in program development.
✔ 0
Comments
54


]

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 2: Curriculum Development Score N/A
2.1 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes content related to education for and about business.
✔ 0
2.2 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that reflect local, state, and national standards.
✔ 0
2.3 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of achievement standards, performance expectations, and
assessment. ✔ 0
2.4 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of sequential integrated learning experiences.
✔ 0
2.5 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that provides for delivery of content in a developmentally appropriate manner.
✔ 0
2.6 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes the development of knowledge, skills and attitudes.
✔ 0
✔
2.7 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that encourages students to use reflective thinking, problem solving, and other
higher level thinking skills.
0
✔
2.8 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes multidisciplinary approaches.
0
2.9 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that serves the needs of diverse populations.
✔ 0
2.10 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that enables students to make a transition from school to career.
✔ 0
✔
2.11 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that focuses on continuous quality education.
0
Comments
55


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
Standard 3: Instruction Score N/A
✔
3.1 Prospective business teachers use self-directed learning to help students gain access to knowledge, direct their own learning, and
learn how to learn. 0
3.2 Prospective business teachers employ a variety of instructional strategies to engage all students in the learning process.
✔ 0
3.3 Prospective business teachers facilitate collaborative learning that may include students, teachers, business and community
representatives, and others. ✔ 0
✔
3.4 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning.
0
3.5 Prospective business teachers help all students realize their full potential.
✔ 0
3.6 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand learning opportunities.
✔ 0
Comments
Standard 4: Assessment Score N/A

4.1 Prospective business teachers develop formative and summative assessments linked to achievement standards and performance
expectations for learning. ✔ 0
4.2 Prospective business teachers use multiple forms of assessment to obtain accurate measures of student progress including formal,
informal and authentic measures. ✔ 0
Comments
56


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
candidate did not involve the standard. candidate is contrary to the standard and candidate is frequently observed and candidate is constantly observed
does not meet the expectations for a meets expectations for a student and consistently exceeds
student teacher. teacher. expectations for a student teacher.
Standard 5: Classroom Environment Score N/A
✔
5.1 Prospective business teachers establish and maintain a classroom environment based on rapport and respect.
0
✔
5.2 Prospective business teachers promote a culture for learning.
0
5.3 Prospective business teachers develop and implement classroom procedures.

✔ 0
✔
5.4 Prospective business teachers manage student behavior.
0
✔
5.5 Prospective business teachers organize physical space.
0
Comments
Standard 6: Student Organizations Score N/A
✔
6.1 Prospective business teachers support the student organization to provide an environment in which students grow professionally,
0
personally, and socially.
6.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student organization provides opportunities to involve the business and
professional community in support of the goals of the business education program. ✔ 0
✔
6.3 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student-directed operation of the organization provides opportunities for personal
growth and leadership development. 0
Comments
57


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
candidate did not involve the standard. candidate is contrary to the standard and candidate is frequently observed and candidate is constantly observed
does not meet the expectations for a meets expectations for a student and consistently exceeds
student teacher. teacher. expectations for a student teacher.
Standard 7: Score N/A

✔
7.1 Prospective business teachers base all communication on principles of respect, fairness, and honesty, and understands that building
0
relationships depends on these foundations.
7.2 Prospective business teachers exhibit an understanding of communication as a dynamic system of people, processes, cultures, media,
and fluid boundaries in developing strategies. ✔ 0
7.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning.
✔ 0
7.4 Prospective business teachers incorporate quality standards in all forms of communication.
✔ 0
7.5 Prospective business teachers serve as an ambassador for business education with all stakeholders.
✔ 0
✔
7.6 Prospective business teachers recognize that culture impacts business communication.
0
✔
7.7 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand communication opportunities.
0
Comments
58


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
8.1 Prospective business teachers communicate effectively with all stakeholders by understanding communication as a dynamic system
of people, cultures, and media. ✔ 0
✔
8.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that student achievement is a collaborative effort among a variety of stakeholders.
0
✔
8.3 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with stakeholders to create a learning environment in which students
0
move continuously and easily between school and community to facilitate the learning process.
8.4 Prospective business teachers develop partnerships with members of the educational, business and other communities to improve
programs, develop new programs, provide student access to learning to learning opportunities, and ensure a curriculum based on real
world experiences.
✔ 0
✔
8.5 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with all stakeholders based on trust, respect, ethical standards, and 0
mutual benefits to earn commitment, dedicated involvement, visible advocacy, and financial support.
Comments

✔
9.1 Prospective business teachers assist students in adjusting to and functioning effectively in educational and business environments.
0
9.2 Prospective business teachers help students discover their potential for intellectual, personal, social and emotional growth.
✔ 0
✔
9.3 Prospective business teachers help students make decisions regarding careers and career transitions.
0
✔
9.4 Prospective business teachers collaborate with student support services when appropriate.
0
Comments
59


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
10.1 Prospective business teachers study a broad range of business content areas including accounting, business law, career
development, communication, computation, economics & personal finance, entrepreneurship, information technology, international 0
business, management, marketing, and the interrelatedness of business functions.
✔
10.2 Prospective business teachers develop knowledge and competencies in written and oral communication: values, ethics, and social
0
responsibilities; quantitative skills; contributions of all segments of society; human behavior, cultural differences; and a global perspective.
10.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate the knowledge and skills in educational foundations, teaching-learning theory, learning
styles, exceptionalities, instructional strategies, assessment techniques, and field experiences to effectively teach business education. ✔ 0
✔
10.4 Prospective business teachers gain real life experience in the application of business knowledge and skills.
0
Comments
60

English Placements: National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTE Standard 1: English Language Arts (ELA) Candidate Program Structure Score N/A
✔
Candidates follow a specific curriculum and are expected to meet appropriate performance assessments for
preservice English language arts teachers. 0
Comments
NCTE Standard 2: ELA Candidate Attitudes Score N/A
✔
Through modeling, advisement, instruction, field experiences, assessment of performance, and involvement in
professional organizations, candidates adopt and strengthen professional attitudes needed by English language 0
arts teachers.
Comments
61

English Placements: National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTE Standard 3: ELA Candidate Knowledge Score N/A
✔
Candidates are knowledgeable about language; literature; oral, visual, and written literacy; print and nonprint
media; technology; and research theory and findings. 0
Comments
NCTE Standard 4: ELA Candidate Pedagogy Score N/A
✔
Candidates acquire and demonstrate the dispositions and skills needed to integrate knowledge of English
language arts, students, and teaching. 0
Comments
62

History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCSS Theme 1: Culture and Cultural Diversity Score N/A
✔
Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of culture and cultural diversity. 0
Comments
NCSS Theme 2: Time, Continuity, and Change Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of time, continuity, and change. 0
Comments
63

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCSS Theme 3: People, Places, and Environments Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of people, places, and environments. 0
Comments
NCSS Theme 4: Individual Development and Identity Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of Individual development and identity 0
Comments
64

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCSS Theme 5: Individuals, Groups, and Institutions Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of interactions among individuals, groups, and 0
institutions.
Comments
NCSS Theme 6: Power, Authority, and Governance Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of power, authority, and governance. 0
Comments
65

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCSS Theme 7: Production, Distribution, and Consumption Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of how people organize for the production, distribution, 0
and consumption of goods and services.
Comments
NCSS Theme 8: Science, Technology, and Society Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of science, technology, and society. 0
Comments
66

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCSS Theme 9: Global Connections Score N/A
✔
Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to provide instruction at the
appropriate school level for the study of global connections and interdependence. 0
Comments
NCSS Theme 10: Civic Ideals and Practices Score N/A
✔
instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of civic ideals and practices. 0
Comments
67

Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 1: Knowledge of Mathematical Problem Solving Score N/A
✔
Candidates know, understand, and apply the process of mathematical problem solving.
0
Comments
NCTM Standard 2: Knowledge of Reasoning and Proof Score N/A
✔
Candidates reason, construct, and evaluate mathematical arguments and develop an appreciation for
mathematical rigor and inquiry 0
Comments
68


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 3: Knowledge of Mathematical Communication Score N/A
✔
Candidates communicate their mathematical thinking orally and in writing to peers, faculty, and others.
0
Comments
NCTM Standard 4: Knowledge of Mathematical Connections Score N/A
✔
Candidates recognize, use, and make connections between and among mathematical ideas and in contexts
outside mathematics to build mathematical understanding. 0
Comments
69


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 5: Knowledge of Mathematical Representation Score N/A
✔
Candidates use varied representations of mathematical ideas to support and deepen students’ mathematical
understanding. 0
Comments
NCTM Standard 6: Knowledge of Technology Score N/A
✔
Candidates embrace technology as an essential tool for teaching and learning mathematics.
0
Comments
70


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 7: Dispositions Score N/A
✔
Candidates support a positive disposition toward mathematical processes and mathematical learning.
0
Comments
NCTM Standard 8: Knowledge of Mathematics Pedagogy Score N/A
✔
Candidates possess a deep understanding of how students learn mathematics and of the pedagogical knowledge
specific to mathematics teaching and learning.
0
Comments
71


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 9: Knowledge of Number and Operation Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate computational proficiency, including a conceptual understanding of numbers, ways of
representing numbers, relationships among number and number systems, and meanings of operations.
0
Comments
NCTM Standard 10: Knowledge of Different Perspectives on Algebra Score N/A
✔
Candidates emphasize relationships among quantities including functions, ways of representing mathematical
relationships, and the analysis of change. 0
Comments
72


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 11: Knowledge of Geometries Score N/A
✔
Candidates use spatial visualization and geometric modeling to explore and analyze geometric shapes,
structures, and their properties. 0
Comments
NCTM Standard 12: Knowledge of Calculus Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate a conceptual understanding of limit, continuity, differentiation, and integration and a
thorough background in the techniques and application of the calculus.
0
Comments
73


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 13: Knowledge of Discrete Mathematics Score N/A
✔
Candidates apply the fundamental ideas of discrete mathematics in the formulation and solution of problems.
0
Comments
NCTM Standard 14: Knowledge of Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability Score N/A
✔
Candidates demonstrate an understanding of concepts and practices related to data analysis, statistics, and
probability.
0
Comments
74


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NCTM Standard 15: Knowledge of Measurement Score N/A
✔
Candidates apply and use measurement concepts and tools.
0
Comments
75

Physical Education Placements: Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) Scoring Guide
N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
SHAPE: Standard 1 Score N/A
✔
The physically literate individual demonstrates competency in a variety of motor skills and movement patterns.
0
Comments
✔
The physically literate individual applies knowledge of concepts, principles, strategies and tactics related to
movement and performance. 0
Comments
76

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
The physically literate individual demonstrates the knowledge and skills to achieve and maintain a health-
enhancing level of physical activity and fitness. 0
Comments
✔
The physically literate individual exhibits responsible personal and social behavior that respects self and others.
0
Comments
77

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
✔
The physically literate individual recognizes the value of physical activity for health, enjoyment, challenge, self-
expression and/or social interaction. 0
Comments
78

Science Placements: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NSTA Standard 1: Content Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science understand and can articulate the knowledge and practices of contemporary science. They
can interrelate and interpret important concepts, ideas, and applications in their fields of licensure; and can 0
conduct scientific investigations.
Comments
NSTA Standard 2: Nature of Science Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science engage students effectively in studies of the history, philosophy, and practice of science.
They enable students to distinguish science from nonscience, understand the evolution and practice of science as 0
a human endeavor, and critically analyze assertions made in the name of science.
Comments
79


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NSTA Standard 3: Inquiry Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science engage students both in studies of various methods of scientific inquiry and in active
learning through scientific inquiry. They encourage students, individually and collaboratively, to observe, ask
0
questions, design inquiries, and collect and interpret data in order to develop concepts and relationships from
empirical experiences.
Comments
NSTA Standard 4: Issues Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science recognize that informed citizens must be prepared to make decisions and take action on
contemporary science- and technology-related issues of interest to the general society. They require students to
0
conduct inquiries into the factual basis of such issues and to assess possible actions and outcomes based upon
their goals and values.
Comments
80


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NSTA Standard 5: General Skills of Teaching Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science create a community of diverse learners who construct meaning from their science
experience and possess a disposition for further exploration and learning. They use, and can justify, a variety of 0
classroom arrangements, groupings, actions, strategies, and methodologies.
Comments
NSTA Standard 6: Curriculum Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science plan and implement an active, coherent, and effective curriculum that is consistent with the
goals and recommendations of the National Science Education Standards. They begin with the end in mind and 0
effectively incorporate contemporary practices and resources into their planning and teaching.
Comments
81


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NSTA Standard 7: Science in the Community Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science relate their discipline to their local and regional communities, involving stakeholders and
using the individual, institutional, and natural resources of the community in their teaching. They actively engage 0
students in science-related studies or activities related to locally important issues.
Comments
NSTA Standard 8: Assessment Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science construct and use effective assessment strategies to determine the backgrounds and
achievement of learners and facilitate their intellectual, social, and personal development. They assess students
0
fairly and equitably, and require that students engage in ongoing self-assessment.
Comments
82


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NSTA Standard 9: Safety and Welfare Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science organize safe and effective learning environments that promote the success of students
and the welfare of all living things. They require and promote knowledge and respect for safety, and oversee the
0
welfare of all living things used in the classroom or found in the field.
Comments
NSTA Standard 10: Professional Growth Score N/A
✔
Teachers of science strive continuously to grow and change, personally and professionally, to meet the diverse
needs of their students, school, community, and profession. They have a desire and disposition for growth and 0
betterment.
Comments
83

Theatre Placements: National Association of Schools of Theatre (NAST) Scoring Guide

N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAST Item 2a: Score N/A
✔
An understanding of child development and the identification and understanding of psychological principles of
learning as these relate to theatre education. 0
Comments
NAST Item 2b: Score N/A
✔
An understanding of the philosophical and social foundation underlying theatre in education and the ability to
express a rationale for personal attitudes and beliefs. 0
Comments
84


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAST Item 2c: Score N/A
✔
An ability to assess aptitudes, experiential backgrounds, skills, and interests of individuals and groups of pupils,
to devise learning experiences to meet assessed needs, and to manage classrooms and rehearsals effectively. 0
Comments
NAST Item 2d: Score N/A
✔
Knowledge of current methods and materials available in all fields and levels of theatre education.
0
Comments
85


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAST Item 2e: Score N/A
✔
An understanding of the principles and methods of developing curricula and the short- and long-term units that
comprises them. 0
Comments
NAST Item 2f: Score N/A
✔
An understanding of evaluative techniques and the ability to apply them in assessing both the progress of
students and in the objectives and procedures of the curriculum. 0
Comments
86


N/A 2 to 79 80 to 86 87 to 100
student teacher.
NAST Item 2g: Score N/A
✔
An awareness of the need for continuing study, self-evaluation, and professional growth.
0
Comments
87

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.
Once this evaluation is completed and submitted, the score is final and cannot be changed or altered by the GCU Faculty Supervisor or by GCU
staff.
%
Total Scored Percentage:
ATTACHMENTS
Clinical Practice Time Log:
(Required)
Attachment 1:
(Optional)
Attachment 2:
(Optional)
AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU
Faculty Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the
evaluation meeting.
I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.
GCU Faculty Supervisor E- Date

Signature
Christine Tax (Apr 30, 2018) Apr 30, 2018
88

Ech485 Clinical Practice Evaluation 4 Original - Wright Asja

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Ech485 Clinical Practice Evaluation 4 Original - Wright Asja

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4

Asja Wright 20192512

Bachelor of Science in Early Childhood Education

ECH-485 2/26/2018 4/29/2018

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

Asja Wright 20192512

Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

High Expectations Score N/A

Respect for the Diversity of Others Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Fairness Score N/A

Professional Conduct Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Reflection Score N/A

Curiosity Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Honesty Score N/A

Compassion Score N/A

Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Advocacy Score N/A

Dedication Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 1: Student Development Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 2: Learning Differences Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 3: Learning Environments Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 4: Content Knowledge Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 5: Application of Content Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 6: Assessment Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 7: Planning for Instruction Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 8: Instructional Strategies Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration Score N/A

Asja Wright 20192512

Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) Standards

Program Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) Pages

Dance NASD National Association of Schools of Dance 18-23

Elementary (ESL Emphasis) ACEI Association of Childhood Education International 32-39

Secondary- Business NBEA National Business Education Association 54-60

Secondary- English NCTE National Council of Teachers of English 61-62

Secondary- Math NCTM National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 68-75

Secondary- Science NSTA National Science Teachers Association 79-83