Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Xavier C. Perry
Abstract
This paper examines the religion in the public school system. The text will view the clauses,
Establishment and Free Exercise, as they pertain to both the First Amendment and the rights and
responsibilities of public figures to “maintain the wall of separation without being hostile to
religion” (Underwood p 209). This Artifact will examine four court cases related to both the
scenario provided and also the subject matter of religion and public schools. Through these court
cases we will observe many struggles. Some of those struggles include, but are not limited to,
public figures (educators) attempting to be subjective as it pertains to religion and the struggle
that public figures endure in order to maintain the student’s First Amendment right and also
respect the integrity of the schools guidelines. Additionally, the natural rights of a teacher and
how they can affect their work environment and those within the body of the environment.
Religion and Public Schools 3
Karen White is a kindergarten teacher whom recently became affiliated with the Jehovah’s
Witnesses. Following her affiliation with this group, White notified her students and the parents
of the students that she could no longer participate or lead certain activities and projects because
they are religious in nature. Parents protested after finding out that there child’s kindergarten
teacher would no longer decorate the classroom for holidays or plan gift exchanges during the
Christmas season. Nor would she be singing “Happy Birthday” or reciting the “Pledge of
Allegiance”. When this was brought to the school principal’s attention, Bill Ward, decided to
recommend Karen Whites dismissal based on his belief that she was ineffectively meeting the
There are many court cases that share similar concepts to the Karen White situation, wherein
Judges were faced with making the most reasonable decisions based on a case by case situation. I
believe it to be important to recognize that the Supreme Court has no indefinite ruling on
religious holidays in public schools. “Public Schools may not sponsor religious practices”
(Underwood p 216). This by no means, mandates that the conversation or celebration of holidays
is outlawed, but instead that holiday programs and activities must establish an educational
purpose rather than a religious objective. The First Amendment as it pertains to religious
freedoms has chartered two separate clauses. In order to determine the outcome of the Karen
White scenario, it’s pertinent to dissect these two clauses. The first clause, Establishment Clause,
excludes the instituting of religion by the government. While on the other hand, the, Free
Exercise Clause, restricts the government from infringing on an individual’s free exercise of
religion. As, we previously learned in the course text, “School Law For Teachers Concepts and
Applications”, teachers are not always afforded the same rights as other adults. Regardless of
either clause, “the government may not actually or in appearance endorse religion” (Underwood
Religion and Public Schools 4
p 211). Karen White chose to bring her religious beliefs into the classroom, impose them on her
students and asserted her reason why being her new affiliation with the Jehovah Witnesses, to the
student’s parents. By all accounts, White allowed her personal religious beliefs to invade the
classroom environment. Under the Establishment Clause, schools have a “constitutional duty to
A case similar in concept, was the case in which the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals determined
that a fifth grade teacher’s rights had not been violated when she was asked to remove a religious
poster which was displayed in her classroom and also to discontinue her reading of the bible at
her desk during her classes quiet reading time. I realize that White wasn’t draping religious
materials about the classroom or reading a religious related book in the presence of the children,
but she was in fact endorsing her religious beliefs as well. White even endorsed her beliefs by
making the parents of her students aware of why she wouldn’t be participating in or endorsing
certain activities and programs in her class any longer. The premise of both of these situations is
that with respect to teachers, (public figures), it’s important that schools avoid any appearances
that could lead one to the conclusion that, the specific school and school employees are
endorsing religion supersedes the right to freedom of speech as it pertains to school employees.
There have also been cases wherein Courts found in favor of the school employee,
conceptually. A case with a similar concept is the case of Wigg v. Sioux Falls School District,
wherein a third grade teacher, wanted to participate in a student religious club meeting that was
being held after school. The principal suggested that she not involve herself in the meeting, as it
could potentially be perceived by some as the teacher advocating the religion. The courts found
Religion and Public Schools 5
in favor of the third grade teacher. It was determined that because the meeting was being held
after school and Wigg was attending in the capacity of a private individual, that she was in fact
well within her rights. Wigg, like White wasn’t participating in religious endorsements of any
kind during school hours. White simply didn’t want to engage in religious activities and
programs during the school hours, so she removed such engagements from her classroom.
Finally, Holiday displays may include religious symbols and are welcome in the school
environment as long as the displays aren’t permanent, don’t require participation in any religious
activities and include diverse ethnic, religious and cultural symbols. The display must suit the
educational environment in that the display supports valid educational goals. The school systems,
don’t strive to eliminate religion, but instead mandate that school employees not endorse specific
religions, beliefs and transfer their personal views into the classroom. By this contention, Karen
White followed the guidelines associated with Holidays in the educational environment. She
wasn’t endorsing religion, but instead was removing any notion of it from her kindergarten class.
Religion and Public Schools 6
Conclusion
It’s my belief that Principal Bill Ward’s recommendation to dismiss, kindergarten teacher,
Karen White based on her ineffectively meeting the needs of her students would be upheld by the
courts. My belief that the courts would rule in favor of Ward’s recommendation of dismissal is
based on a few simple facts. White knowingly endorsed her religion and forced upon her
students, her religion. She refused, not only the activities and programs associated with Holidays,
but additionally refused to sing Happy Birthday or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. White
directly ignored and violated the Establishment Clause. She clearly endorsed her own personal
religious beliefs which additionally provides that if the school doesn’t take action than they are
providing the appearance of endorsing religion. And finally, schools have a constitutional duty to
References
Underwood, Julie & Webb, L. Dean. (2005). Religion and Public Schools.
Stollenwork, Debra A. & Rogers, Elisa, School Law For Teachers Concepts and
Underwood, Julie & Webb, L. Dean. (2005). Religion and Public Schools.
Stollenwork, Debra A. & Rogers, Elisa, School Law For Teachers Concepts and
Underwood, Julie & Webb, L. Dean. (2005). Religion and Public Schools.
Stollenwork, Debra A. & Rogers, Elisa, School Law For Teachers Concepts and
Underwood, Julie & Webb, L. Dean. (2005). Religion and Public Schools.
Stollenwork, Debra A. & Rogers, Elisa, School Law For Teachers Concepts and