Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ava Isola
Ms. Gardner
30 April 2018
Epidemics have been wiping out populations since the dawn of man. Is the global
health community prepared for the next global epidemic? How much have the governments of the world
actually put in to keeping everyone safe from something this difficult to prevent? Since the dawn of man,
viruses and plagues have swept the world and taken up to a third of its human population. With Earth’s
ever-growing amount of people, it is overdue for the next global epidemic. Donald McNeil Jr, a writer for
the New York Times, states that only six countries in the entire world have have gone through the “two
external evaluations of their readiness to face pandemics.” The global health community is unprepared
and unwilling to face the next global epidemic, for they ignore the risk of epidemics, neglect aid to
underdeveloped countries, and cause chaos while trying to contain disease outbreaks.
When reading the news, one may infer that the world has prepared as much as it can
for something as drastic as an epidemic. Scientists have been pumping out vaccines and treating diseases
left and right. A writer for the Los Angeles Times, Melissa Healy, describes a treatment for Hepatitis,
writing that the “Food and Drug Administration has approved a few new antiviral drugs to treat Hepatitis
C in the last two years.” Additionally, the CDC constantly aids other countries in cutting the problem at
the root by treating people in the city a disease originated from, which prevents the disease from
spreading. A study done by the University of Illinois’ Chicago says that over 450,000 deaths from the
mumps, measles, polio, rabies, hepatitis A, and several other diseases were prevented by a “1962
breakthrough” in which Leonard Hayflick created the normal human cell strain (“Ten Million Lives
Saved by 1962 Breakthrough, Study Says”). This has been used to safely develop vaccines for over ten
diseases. Overall, some believe that the breakthroughs in vaccines in recent years is enough to protect
them from future epidemics. Yes, the vaccines created in the past hundred years have been revolutionary
2 Isola
and protect against many diseases, like the HPV vaccines and the new treatments for the Whooping
Cough; nevertheless, scientists have not cured every disease (Cholera, AIDS, and Ebola, just to name a
few) and vaccines may not be received by the whole world due to expenses or the anti-vaccine movement
(“Timeline”).
Of course, new medical research has been very helpful in treating pandemics all over
the globe, but until recently, most vaccines have been labeled too expensive to produce, even the
scientifically simplest vaccines; therefore, most countries do not realize that Epidemics cost a lot more
than the vaccines that will prevent them and they ignore the risk. “The world’s failure to control Ebola
quickly in 2014 and 2015 cost 11,000 lives and at least $6 billion,” states Tina Rosenberg, a journalist for
the New York Times. After this catastrophe, three global experts in this field proposed a $2 billion startup
for an organization for vaccine development, this was approved and funded by many countries, including
Norway, Germany, Japan, and India (Rosenberg). Although this is a great starting point, the vaccines they
are making take time for approval, and an efficient way to distribute them is yet to be created
(Rosenberg). The CEPI, an organization that was long overdue, is a wake up call to those still sleeping in
ignorance, ignoring the threat of Epidemics. It took 11,000 deaths and $6 billion for the global health
community to realize how unprepared the world is for these disasters, and yet some still turn a blind eye.
Ignoring preparations for the inevitable disaster of an epidemic is causing many countries to lose money,
Along with overall neglect of the issue at hand, the governments of the world, especially of
first-world countries, tend to forget that most underdeveloped countries can not afford adequate
preparation for future pandemics. Tikki Pang, a former member of the World Health Organization (WHO)
describes this problem as “an ongoing concern”, stating, “many developing countries are not sufficiently
prepared to deal with an emerging pandemic owing to limited resources, competing priorities and lack of
political commitment.” These statements are especially worrying considering disease outbreaks and
pandemics are more common in poor conditions. In 1842, a typhus epidemic in Upper Silesia was
studied, the results concluded that “there can now no longer be any doubt that such an epidemic
3 Isola
dissemination of typhus had only been possible under the wretched conditions of life that poverty and
lack of culture had created in Upper Silesia” (qtd. in Oppenheim). The global health community has come
out with vaccines aiding potential outbreaks that are out of reach to those who need it most, and there is
not yet a solution to this problem. Some may say that this issue will only affect the country it occurs in
and should not be the priority of the whole world. Regarding the Ebola epidemic, Thomas Frieden, the
former director of the CDC, pointed out that Ebola “would have spread all over Nigeria, all over Africa,
and could have continued to spread for years” without their quick response (qtd. in Coughlin). Also,
regarding the response by some US politicians, Frieden stated “as long as the outbreak smolders in Africa,
as long as it’s in Africa, we’re potentially at risk, because even if we tried to close the border, it wouldn’t
work” (qtd. in Coughlin). Destroying the problem at the root and aiding third-world countries in
pandemic and epidemic prevention is essential to the health of not only the citizens of the aided countries,
but the citizens of every country. Therefore, the global health community must stop turning a blind eye.
Although failing to focus on the issue of epidemics and leaving underdeveloped countries without
resources has been rampant, the unpreparedness of the global health community for epidemics is
Displayed the most through past outbreaks of diseases and their lack of interest in preparing for the worst.
Three major diseases affected air travel specifically: SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) in
2003, swine flu in 2009, and Ebola in 2014 (Johnson). SARS made its way out of Asia, as the only line of
defense set up by the government was a screen displaying the body temperature of all the passengers who
walked through it (Johnson). This did nothing. The Ebola virus was even worse; as the CDC arrived to
inspect a group of individuals rumored to have the illness, the set up they required to put on their
protective gear held up luggage from being loaded onto the plane, which blocked other responders from
arriving on the scene (Johnson). The chaos of this situation is an obvious example of governmental
naivety; for, if they had already had a plan, they would not have created such chaos. The American
government has not learned from its mistakes as the CDC has just mojorly downsized its epidemic
prevention activities due to lack of funding, causing anti-epidemic programs to cease in thirty-nine
countries (Sun). “The CDC plans to narrow its focus to 10 ‘priority countries’ starting in October 2019”,
4 Isola
comments Lena Sun, a writer for the Washington Post, “They are India, Thailand, Vietnam, Jordan,
Kenya, Uganda, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal and Guatemala.” The US government’s small-mindedness and
lack of interest on the issue shows the global health community is lacking in readiness for the next disease
scare. The lack of interest on this important issue and the global health community’s reaction to previous
preparing for the next global epidemic. An epidemic is a hovering danger that seems so unreachable and
far away that most just ignore the threat altogether, but the more the danger is ignored, the more of a
threat it becomes. Diseases are becoming easier and easier to spread, as Rosenberg claims that “according
to mathematical modeling by the Gates Foundation, a virulent strain of airborne flu virus could spread to
all major global capitals within 60 days. Within 250 days, it could kill more than 33 million people.” The
global health community is not prepared to handle anything like this disastrous situation. Vote for
politicians who support anti-epidemic strategies and donate to local causes that are attempting to prevent
outbreaks, like the CEPI. Cut the problem at the root and prevent outbreaks of disease before they even
start -- protect not only yourself, but your families and your fellow man.
Works Cited
Coughlin, Christine N., and Adam Messenlehner. "Isolationist Policies Threaten Public
Health." American Journal of Public Health, 2017, pp. 860-861. SIRS Issues Researcher,
https://sks.sirs.com.
Healy, Melissa. "A Bold Strategy to Eradicate Hepatitis." Los Angeles Times, 02 Apr,
Johnson, Mark, and McKenna Oxenden. "U.S. Lacks Plan on Airborne Diseases." USA
McNeil, Jr, Donald G. "Only Six Nations have Evaluated Readiness for Global
Pandemic." New York Times (Online), 31 Jul, 2017. SIRS Issues Researcher, https://sks.sirs.com.
Oppenheim, Ben, and Gavin Yamey. “Pandemics and the Poor.” Brookings, Brookings, 19
June 2017,www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2017/06/19/pandemics-and-the-poor/.
Pang, Tikki. “Is the Global Health Community Prepared for Future Pandemics?” EMBO
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888848/.
Rosenberg, Tina. "Stopping Pandemics before they Start." New York Times (Online), 27
Sun, Lena H. "U.S. to Curtail Global Prevention Efforts." Washington Post, 02 Feb, 2018, pp.
"Ten Million Lives Saved by 1962 Breakthrough, Study Says." Targeted News Service,