Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
4. SITE SELECTION
4.1. THE 4 SITE SYSTEM FOR MALE AND FEMALE SUBJECTS
4.2. THE 3 SITE SYSTEM FOR MALE SUBJECTS
4.3. THE 3 SITE SYSTEM FOR FEMALE SUBJECTS
6. LIMIT OF LIABILITY
9. BIBLIOGRAPAHY
Thank you for purchasing our product. We are confident that you have chosen one of the most up to date and versatile
Skinfold Calipers on the market. Used correctly it will give good service and reliable results for many years and, so that
optimum results are obtained, you should read this manual thoroughly even if experienced in the use of this type of
equipment. The Harpenden Skinfold Caliper is CE marked in compliance with the Medical Devises Directive 93/42/EEC for a
Class 1 Device with Measuring.
The carry case should contain one Harpenden SkinfoId Caliper Instrument and one copy of this handbook.
The most accurate estimation of body composition is achieved by use of the underwater or hydrostatic weighing technique.
Obviously, this method places severe restrictions on both practicality and convenience, and the alternative basis of skinfold
thickness measurements is therefore used in all but the most stringent of requirements. The use of skinfold calipers in the
performance of skinfold thickness measurements (from which are derived the estimates of body fat) has been well
established and documented over the last 40 years, references to which can be found in the Bibliography section of this
manual. These thickness measurements do not measure overall body fat mass or its percentage directly but rely on validated
equations that describe the relationship between measures of skinfold fat as well as other body dimensions and the
measured body density. Body fat percentage is determined from the estimate of body density. Various experimenters have
put forward equations that are used with either skinfold thickness alone or in conjunction with other measurements such as
body circumference or limb lengths. Two of the most common sets of equations used are attributable to Durnin & Wormersley
(skinfolds alone), and to Jackson & Pollock (skinfolds and body measurements). The results obtained from the equations
(that of body fat density) are subsequently used in the Sin equation to calculate the body fat. Tables are included that show
the fat percentage based on the Durnin & Wormersley system. Values are shown for both males and females across the
whole age range based on the sum of 4 skinfold measurements, and the results shown for each 2 millimetre increment of
skinfold thickness. Skinfold measurements, when properly taken, correlate very highly (0.83 to 0.89) with hydrostatic
weighing, with a standard error of only about 3 or 4%. In comparison, the correlation of height and weight charts is much
lower at about 0.60. The explanation of the use of skinfold thickness measurement in the derivation of body fat data has bean
simplified enormously, and can never detract from the tremendous volume of research and scientific ability in the fields of
both nutrition and fitness. We all owe much respect and our considerable thanks to the specialists responsible for guiding us
towards a healthier life worldwide.
The accuracy of measurement is, as one would expect, dependant upon the accuracy of the equipment being used, the
correct selection and location of the skinfold sites, the proper technique in taking the measurements and the experience of
the user.
4 SITE SELECTION
Site selection is very important and frequently a source of error in skinfold testing. The sites selected must match the
particular protocol being used. There are two protocols usually involved, the 4-site system being the most commonly
used. This system is the same for male and female subjects and has been used as the basis for the correlations in this
manual. The second system uses 3 sites, the sites differing for either male or female subjects, and are used in conjunction
with the Body Density formulae (Jackson & Pollock) see pages 4 -5 of the manual.
MALE 17-19 YRS 20-29 YRS 30-39YRS 40-49 YRS 50+ YRS
C 1.1620 11631 1.1422 1.1620 1.1715
M 0.0630 0.0632 0.0544 0.0700 0.0779
FEMALE 16-19 YRS 20-29 YRS 30-39YRS 40-49 YRS 50+ YRS
C 1.1549 1.1599 1.1423 1.1333 1.1339
M 0.0678 0.0717 0.0632 0.0612 0.0645
THE SIRI EQUATION FAT% = [(4.95/BD) -4.5] x100 Alternatively use the look up tables on page 7
1 SITE 1 CHEST (JUXTA-NIPPLES) A diagonal fold taken one half of the distance
between the anterior auxiliary line and the nipple. (The anterior auxiliary line is the
crease where the top of the arm, when hanging down, meets the chest).
2 SITE 2 ABDOMINAL The vertical fold taken at the lateral distance of approximately
2cm from the umbilicus (2cm to the side of the umbilicus).
3 SITE 3 THIGH A vertical fold on the anterior aspect of the thigh, midway between the
hip and knee joints (on the front of the thigh halfway between the hip joint, where the leg
bends when the knee is lifted, and the middle of the knee cap). The leg should be
straight and relaxed.
Using BODY DENSITY EQUATIONS (JACKSON & POLLOCK) to calculate % Body fat
MALE BD = 1.0990750 - 0.0008209 (X2) + 0.0000026 (X2)2 - 0.0002017 (X3) - 0.005675 (X4) + 0.018586 (X5)
Where
X2 = sum of the chest, abdomen and thigh skinfolds in mm
X3 = age in years
X4 = waist circumference in cm
X5 = forearm circumference in cm
Calculate the Male % Body Fat using THE SIRI EQUATION
FEMALE BD = 1.1470292 - 0.0009376 (X3) + 0.0000030 (X3)2 - 0.0001156 (X4) - 0.0005839 (X5)
Where
X3 = sum of triceps, thigh and suprailliac skinfolds in mm
X4 = age in years
X5 = gluteal circumference in cm
Calculate the Female % Body Fat using THE SIRI EQUATION FAT% = [(4.95/BD) -4.5] x100
6 LIMIT OF LIABILITY
All information of a medical nature contained in this manual is based upon the documents cited in the Bibliography and is
offered in good faith for convenience of the user. The manufacturer or supplier of this instrument does not however accept
any liability for conclusions drawn, diagnosis, estimates of state of health, treatments or any other medical assessment
whatsoever based upon the measurements taken using this instrument.
The certification of this instrument will be void if the instrument is dismantled, reassembled or altered in any way by anyone
other than by FitnessASSIST or those agents who have specific approval for recalibration.
FitnessASSIST reserves the right to change the information in this document without notice in line with the policy of continued
product improvement and development. The information contained in this document is considered to be correct at the time of
printing. It is supplied without liability for errors or omissions.
7 TECHNICAL INFORMATION
The Harpenden Skinfold Caliper is CE marked in compliance with the Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC for a Class 1
Device with Measuring Function and is Calibrated up to 80.00mm range using masters traceable to national standards.
Keep the Caliper clean using a lint free cloth and ensure that they are stored in dry conditions to prevent corrosion.
Do not use any spirit based cleaner on the Caliper as this may cause damage to the plastic materials.
If the Caliper is dropped, damaged or fails to maintain repeatability, please return it to the address below or to our accredited
agent from whom you originally purchased the Caliper.
To ensure that the Caliper functions correctly, it should be periodically calibrated in accordance with the requirements of the
establishment where it is to be used.
Cleaning materials containing spirit or alcohol should not be used on this instrument.
9 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brown. W.J. & P.R. M. Jones (1977). The distribution of body fat in relation to physical activity. Ann Humm. Biol. 4,537-550
Durnin. J.VG.A. F.C. Mckay and C. 1. Webster (1 985). A new method of assessing fatness and desirable weight, for use in
the Armed Services Army Department, Ministry of Defence.
Durnin. J.V.G.A. and M.M. Rahaman (1967). The assessment of the amount of fat in he human body from the measurement
of Skinfold Thickness. Br. J. Nutr 21, 681-688
Durnin. J.VG.A. andJ. Wormersley (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from Skinfold
Thickness. Measurement on 381 men and women aged 16 to 72 years. Br. J. Nutr 32, 77-92
Katch F!. & W.D. McArdle (1973). Prediction of body density from simple anthropometric measurements in college-age men
and women.Hum. Biol. 45 445-454
Royal College of Physicians (1983). Obesity. J. Roy. Col. Phys of Lon. 1 7:1, 1-58
Sin. W.E. (1956). The gross composition of the Body. Adv. Biol. Med. Phys. 4, 239-280 Van Itallie T.B. (1979) Obesity:
Adverse effects on health and longevity. Am J. Clin. Nutr.32, 2723-2733
Wilmore J.H. & A.R. Behnke (1968). Predictability of lean body weight through anthropometric assessment in college men. J.
Appi. Physiol. 25, 349-355
Katch Fl. &W.D. McArdle (1977). Nutrition, Weight Control and Exercise. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
J.M. Tanner. The measurement of body fat in man. Brit. Nutr. Soc., 18, 148. 1959
www.fitnessassist.co.uk/skinfoldmeasurementkit
Client Name
Reference Number Date
Date of Birth (dd/mm/yy) Age
Temperature/Humidity Barometric Pressure
Height (cm) Gender Male Female
Weight (kg) Weight (st/lbs) st lbs
Circumferences (cm)
Head Maximum Forearm
Torso at Nipple Height Wrist
Torso at Umbilicus Gluteal Furrow
Torso at Hip Maximum Thigh
Maximum Upper Arm Maximum Calf
3 site method Skinfold Measurements
Male Female
Chest (mm) Triceps (mm)
Abdomen (mm) Suprailiac (mm)
Thigh (mm) Thigh
Waist circumference (cm) Gluteal circumference (cm)
Forearm circumference (cm)
4 site method Skinfold Measurements (mm)
Male / Female
Triceps
Biceps
Subscapular
Suprailiac
1 site methods Skinfold Measurements (mm)
Method 1 - Slim Guide Method 2 - Accu-Measure
Triceps Suprailiac
2 site method Skinfold Measurements (mm)
Triceps
Subscapular