Dennis2018 Econsummer Behaviour

European Journal of Marketing
E-consumer behaviour
Charles Dennis, Bill Merrilees, Chanaka Jayawardhena, Len Tiu Wright,
Article information:
To cite this document:
Charles Dennis, Bill Merrilees, Chanaka Jayawardhena, Len Tiu Wright, (2009) "E‐consumer
Downloaded by Institucion Universitaria Politecnico Grancolombiano At 11:57 22 January 2018 (PT)
behaviour", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 Issue: 9/10, pp.1121-1139, https://

doi.org/10.1108/03090560910976393
Permanent link to this document:
https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910976393
Downloaded on: 22 January 2018, At: 11:57 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 124 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 37461 times since 2009*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2001),"The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?", Journal of Consumer
Marketing, Vol. 18 Iss 7 pp. 560-578 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410263">https://
doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410263</a>
(2002),"Cross-cultural consumer values, needs and purchase behavior", Journal of Consumer
Marketing, Vol. 19 Iss 6 pp. 481-502 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760210444869">https://
doi.org/10.1108/07363760210444869</a>
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:561365 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htm
E-consumer
E-consumer behaviour behaviour
Charles Dennis
Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
Bill Merrilees
Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia 1121
Chanaka Jayawardhena Received April 2007
Loughborough University Business School, Loughborough University, Revised February 2008

Accepted August 2008
Loughborough, UK, and
Len Tiu Wright
Leicester Business School, De Montfort University Business School,
Leicester, UK
Abstract
Purpose – The primary purpose of this paper is to bring together apparently disparate and yet
interconnected strands of research and present an integrated model of e-consumer behaviour. It has a
secondary objective of stimulating more research in areas identified as still being under-explored.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper is discursive, based on analysis and synthesis of
e-consumer literature.
Findings – Despite a broad spectrum of disciplines that investigate e-consumer behaviour and
despite this special issue in the area of marketing, there are still areas open for research into
e-consumer behaviour in marketing, for example the role of image, trust and e-interactivity. The paper
develops a model to explain e-consumer behaviour.
Research limitations/implications – As a conceptual paper, the study is limited to literature and
prior empirical research. It offers the benefit of new research directions for e-retailers in understanding
and satisfying e-consumers. The paper provides researchers with a proposed integrated model of
e-consumer behaviour.
Originality/value – The paper links a significant body of literature within a unifying theoretical
framework and identifies of under-researched areas of e-consumer behaviour in a marketing context.
Keywords Electronic commerce, Consumer behaviour, Marketing
Paper type Conceptual paper
Introduction
Early e-shopping consumer research (e.g. Brown et al., 2003) indicated that e-shoppers
tended to be concerned mainly with functional and utilitarian considerations. As
typical “innovators” (Donthu and Garcia, 1999; Siu and Cheng, 2001), they tended to be
more educated (Li et al, 1999), higher socio-economic status (SES) (Tan, 1999), younger
than average and more likely to be male (Korgaonkar and Wolin, 1999). This suggested
that the e-consumer tended to differ from the typical traditional shopper. More recent
research, on the other hand, casts doubt on this notion. Jayawardhena et al. (2007)
found that consumer purchase orientations in both the traditional world and on the
Internet are largely similar, and there is evidence for the importance of social European Journal of Marketing
Vol. 43 No. 9/10, 2009
interaction (e.g. Parsons, 2002; Rohm and Swaminathan, 2004) and recreational pp. 1121-1139
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
0309-0566
The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for much useful input. DOI 10.1108/03090560910976393
EJM motives (Rohm and Swaminathan, 2004), as demonstrated by virtual ethnography
43,9/10 (webnography) of “Web 2.0” blogs, social networking sites and e-word of mouth
(eWOM) (Wright, 2008). Accordingly, this paper aims to examine concepts of
e-consumer behaviour, including those derived from traditional consumer behaviour.
The study of e-consumer behaviour is gaining in importance due to the proliferation
of online shopping (Dennis et al., 2004; Harris and Dennis, 2008; Jarvenpaa and Todd,
1122 1997). Consumer-oriented research has examined psychological characteristics
(Hoffman and Novak, 1996; Lynch and Beck, 2001; Novak et al., 2000; Wolfinbarger
and Gilly, 2002; Xia, 2002), demographics (Brown et al., 2003; Korgaonkar and Wolin,
1999), perceptions of risks and benefits (Bhatnagar and Ghose, 2004; Huang et al., 2004;
Kolsaker et al., 2004), shopping motivation (Childers et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2007;
Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2002), and shopping orientation (Jayawardhena et al., 2007;
Swaminathan et al., 1999). The technology approach has examined technical
specifications of an online store (Zhou et al., 2007), including interface, design and
navigation (Zhang and Von Dran, 2002), payment (Torksadeth and Dhillon, 2002; Liao
and Cheung, 2002); information (Palmer, 2002; McKinney et al., 2002), intention to use
(Chen and Hitt, 2002), and ease of use (Devaraj et al., 2002; Stern and Stafford, 2006).
The two perspectives do not contradict each other but there remains a scarcity of
published research that combines both. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to
develop and argue in support of an integrated model of e-consumer behaviour, drawing
from both the consumer and technology viewpoints. The paper also has a secondary
objective of stimulating more research in areas identified as still being under-explored.
The research area is potentially fruitful since, even in recession, e-shopping volumes in
the UK, for example, are continuing with double-digit growth (Deloitte, 2007;
IMRG/Capgemini, 2008), whereas traditional shopping is languishing in zero growth or
less (British Retail Consortium, 2008).
The remainder of this article is organised as follows. We develop our model in two
stages. First, we draw from existing literature to present well-known factors that
influence consumer behaviour and form the core of our model. Second, we present a
framework that can be adopted to examine both the influences and interrelationships
between the factors in predicting e-consumer behaviour. Finally we present our
concluding remarks.
Factors influencing e-consumer behaviour

The basic model argues that functional considerations influence attitudes to an
e-retailer, which in turn influence intentions to shop with the e-retailer and then finally
actual e-retail activity, including shopping and continued loyalty behaviour. Our model
is underpinned by the theory of reasoned action (TRA). The choice of this theoretical
lens lies in its acceptance as a useful theory in the study of consumer behaviour, which
“provides a relatively simple basis for identifying where and how to target consumers’
behavioural change attempts” (Sheppard et al., 1988, p. 325). The conceptual
foundations are illustrated in Figure 1.
The role of functional attributes

Researchers attempting to answer why people (e-)shop have looked to various
components of the “image” of (e-)retailing (Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2002). This may be
a valid approach for two reasons. First, “image” is a concept used to signify our overall
E-consumer
behaviour
1123
Figure 1.
The basic model
evaluation or rating of something in such a way as to guide our actions (Boulding,

1956). For example, we are more likely to buy from a store that we consider has a
positive image on considerations that we may consider important, such as price or
customer service. Second, this is an approach that has been demonstrated for
traditional stores and shopping centres over many years (e.g. Berry, 1969; Dennis et al.,
2002b; Lindquist, 1974). This is particularly relevant because it is the traditional
retailers with strong images that have long been making the running in e-retail
(IMRG/Capgemini, 2008; Kimber, 2001). According to Kimber (2001), shopper loyalty
in-store and online are linked. For example, according to www.tesco.com (accessed 26
October, 2001), the supermarket Tesco’s customers using both on- and offline shopping
channels spend 20 percent more on average than customers who only use the
traditional store. Tesco is well known as having a positive image both in-store and
online, being the UK grocery market leader in both channels and the world’s largest
e-grocer (Eurofood, 2000). More recently, the same approach has been applied for
e-image components (Babakus and Boller, 1992; Dennis et al., 2002a; Kooli et al., 2007;
Parasuraman et al., 1988; Teas, 1993). Examples of e-service instruments include:
Loiacono et al.’s (2002) WebQual; Parasuraman et al.’s (2005) E-S-QUAL; Wolfinbarger
and Gilly’s (2003) eTailQ; and Yoo and Donthu’s (2001) SITEQUAL. The most common
image components in the e-retail context include product selection, customer service
and delivery or fulfilment. We therefore propose that:
P1. E-consumer attitude towards an e-retailer will be positively influenced by
customer perceptions of e-retailer image.
TRA (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980) suggests that intentions are the direct outcome of
attitudes (plus social aspects or “subjective norms”, as discussed below) such that there
are no intervening mechanisms between the attitude and the intention. Therefore:
P2. E-consumer intentions to purchase from an e-retailer will be positively
influenced by positive attitudes towards the e-retailer.
EJM Most studies have gone only as far as modelling “intention”, with few addressing
43,9/10 actual adoption (Cheung et al., 2005), and still fewer continuance behaviour or loyalty.
Nevertheless, as mentioned below, as consumers achieve more satisfactory e-shopping
experiences, they are more likely to trust and re-patronise, extending our framework to
behavioural responses. This is in line with the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R)
paradigm (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974) and adoption/continuance (Cheung et al.,
1124 2005). Thus:
P3. Actual purchases from an e-retailer will be positively influenced by intentions
to purchase from an e-retailer.

The consumer purchase process is a series of interlinked multiple stages including
information collection, evaluation of alternatives, the purchase itself and post-purchase
evaluation (Engel et al., 1993). To evaluate the information demands of services,
Zeithaml (1981) suggested a framework based on the inherent search, experience, and
credence qualities of products. Since online shopping is a comparatively new activity,
online purchases are still perceived as riskier than terrestrial ones (Laroche et al., 2005)
and an online shopping consumer therefore relies heavily on experience qualities,
which can be acquired only through prior purchase (Lee and Tan, 2003). This leads to:
P4. Intention to shop with a particular e-retailer will be positively influenced by
past experience.
P5. Actual purchases from an e-retailer will positively influence experience.
Trust, “a willingness to rely on an exchange partner in whom one has confidence”
(Moorman et al., 1992) is central to e-shopping intentions (Fortin et al., 2002; Goode and
Harris, 2007; Lee and Turban, 2001). Security (safety of the computer and financial
information) (Bart et al., 2005; Jones and Vijayasarathy, 1998), and privacy
(individually identifiable information on the internet) (Bart et al., 2005; Swaminathan
et al., 1999) are closely related to trust. Notwithstanding that these constructs differ, in
the interests of simplicity we consider them here to be related aspects of the same
concept, which we name “trust”:
P6. E-consumer trust in an e-retailer will positively influence intention to e-shop.
As e-shoppers become more experienced, trust grows and they tend to shop more and
become less concerned about security (Chen and Barnes, 2007; Oxford Internet
Institute, 2005). Thus:
P7. Past experience and cues that reassure the consumer will positively influence
trust in an e-retailer.
Drawing on early work on another construct of consumer behaviour, i.e. learning
(Bettman, 1979; Kuehn, 1962), an e-retail site becomes more attractive and efficient with
increased use as learning leads to a greater intention to purchase (Bhatnagar and
Ghose, 2004; Johnson et al., 2007). Therefore:
P8. e-Consumers’ learning about an e-retailer web site will positively influence
their intention to purchase.
We now extend our model to include social and experiential aspects of e-consumer E-consumer
behaviour along with consumer traits. The extended model is illustrated in behaviour
Figure 2.
An integrative framework
Social factors
The TRA family theories, which are central to our model (Cheung et al., 2005; Sheppard 1125
et al., 1988), include the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991), the
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) and the Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (Venkatesh et al., 2003). As introduced in

the section entitled “The role of functional attributes” above, intention is influenced by
two factors:
(1) “attitude toward the behaviour”; and
(2) “subjective norms” (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980).
“Subjective norm” refers on one hand to beliefs that specific referents dictate whether
or not one should perform the behaviour or not, and on the other the motivation to
comply with specific referents (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). Simply put, these are “social
factors”, by which we mean the influences of others on purchase intentions. For
example, TRA argues that whether our best friends think that we should make a
particular purchase influences our intention. Numerous studies of traditional shopping
have drawn attention to these aspects (e.g. Dennis, 2005). Social influences are also
important for e-shopping, but e-retailers have difficulty in satisfying these needs (Shim
et al., 2000). Rohm and Swaminathan (2004) found that social interaction was a
significant motivator for e-shopping (along with variety seeking and convenience,
which we consider with situational factors, below). Similarly, Parsons (2002) found that
social motives such as social experiences outside home, communication with others
with similar interests, membership of peer groups, and status and authority were valid
for e-shopping. Social benefits of e-shopping, such as communications with
like-minded people, can be important motivators that influence intention. Web 2.0
social networking sites can link social interactions concerning personal interests with
relevant e-shopping. For example, people with a specific, specialist fascination for
athletic footwear may be members of www.sneakerplay.com. Consumers with a more
general interest in social e-shopping are catered for by www.osoyou.com. Thus:
social factors.
Since attitude and subjective norm cannot be the exclusive determinants of behaviour
where an individual’s control over the behaviour is incomplete, the TPB purports to
improve on the TRA by adding “perceived behavioural control” (PBC), defined as the
ease or difficulty that the person perceives of performing the behaviour. Empirical
studies demonstrate that the addition of PBC significantly improves the modelling of
behaviour (Ajzen, 1991). In the information systems literature, the concept of PBC has
an equivalent in “self-efficacy”, defined as the judgment of one’s ability to use a
computer (Compeau and Higgins, 1995). Researchers have shown that there is a
positive relationship between experience with computing technology, perceived
outcome and usage (Agarwal and Prasad, 1999). There is considerable empirical
EJM
1126
Figure 2.
43,9/10
The enhanced model

evidence on the effect of computer self-efficacy (e.g. Agarwal et al., 2000; Venkatesh, E-consumer
2000). These studies confirm the essential effect of computer self-efficacy in behaviour
understanding individual responses to information technology in general and
e-shopping in particular. There is conceptual and empirical overlap of the constructs of
PBC and self-efficacy with past experience (Alsajjan and Dennis, forthcoming), which
we therefore concentrate into our “Past experience” variable (see the section entitled
“The role of functional attributes” above). 1127
TAM was originally conceived to model the adoption of information systems in the
workplace (Davis, 1989) but two specific dimensions relevant to e-shopping have been
identified:
(1) usefulness; and
(2) ease of use.
Usefulness refers to consumers’ perceptions that using the internet will enhance the
outcome of their shopping and information seeking (Chen et al., 2002). In our model,
usefulness is incorporated into the image components of product selection, customer
service and delivery or fulfilment in the “Role of functional attributes” section above.
Ease of use concerns the degree to which e-shopping is perceived as involving a
minimum of effort, for example in navigability and clarity (Chen et al., 2002). Ease of
use is central to the e-interactivity dimension of our model, considered in the section
entitled “Experiential aspects of e-shopping” below.
Davis et al. (1992) have added a new dimension of attitude into TAM: enjoyment.
Enjoyment reflects the hedonic aspects discussed in the section entitled “Experiential
aspects of e-shopping” below. In a further development of TAM, the UTAUT,
Venkatesh et al. (2003) recognised the moderating effects of consumer traits, considered
in the section entitled “Consumer traits” below. The TRA family theories, including
TPB, TAM and UTAUT, thus constitute the “glue” of the integrative theoretical
framework for our propositions P1-P7 above, as illustrated in Figure 2.
TAM has been criticised for ignoring a number of influences on e-consumer
behaviour. These include social ones (included in the TRA aspect of our model, above)
(Chen et al., 2002) and others such as situational factors (Moon and Kim, 2001) and
consumer traits (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Perea y Monsuwé et al. (2004) add four factors:
(1) consumer traits;
(2) situational factors;
(3) product characteristics; and
(4) trust (trust is considered in the section entitled “The role of functional
attributes” above).
Situational factors may include variety seeking and convenience (identified by Rohm
and Swaminathan, 2004, as a significant motivator for e-shopping). We therefore
extend our framework to include relevant experiential and situational factors; and
consumer traits in the three sections below.
Experiential aspects of e-shopping

For decades, retailers and researchers have been aware that shopping is not just a
matter of obtaining tangible products but also about experience, enjoyment and
EJM entertainment (Martineau, 1958; Tauber, 1972). In the e-shopping context, experience
43,9/10 and enjoyment derive from e-consumers’ interactions with an e-retail site, which we
refer to as “e-interactivity”. E-interactivity encompasses the equivalent of
salesperson-customer interaction as well as visual merchandising and indeed the
impact of all senses on consumer behaviour. Empirically, interactivity has been found
to be a major determinant of consumer attitudes (Fiore et al., 2005; Richard and
1128 Chandra, 2005). Studies include, for example, personalising greeting cards (Wu, 1999),
and creating visual images of clothing combinations (Fiore et al., 2005; Kim and
Forsythe, 2009). More generally, Merrilees and Fry (2002) found that overall
interactivity was the most important determinant of consumer attitudes to a particular

e-retailer and interactivity could influence both trust and attitudes to the e-retailer.
Therefore:
P10. E-consumer attitudes towards an e-retailer will be positively influenced by
e-interactivity.
P11. Trust in an e-retailer will be positively influenced by e-interactivity.
A favourable perception of e-interactivity is likely to be influenced by ease of use of a
website (Merrilees and Fry, 2002). Navigability is a key aspect, i.e. the ability of the
user to find their way around a site and keep track of where they are (Richard and
Chandra, 2005). Thus:
P12. E-consumers’ perceptions of e-interactivity will be positively influenced by
ease of navigation.
Many studies in the bricks-and-mortar world have used an environmental psychology
framework to demonstrate that cues in the retail “atmosphere” or environment can
affect consumers’ emotions, which in turn can influence behaviour. The importance of
this S-O-R model (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974) is that the stimulus cues such as
colour, music or aroma can be manipulated by marketers to increase shoppers’
pleasure and arousal, which in turn should lead to more “approach” behaviour, for
example spending (rather than “avoidance”). Dailey (2004) and Eroglu et al. (2003)
demonstrated that the same type of “web atmospherics” model can be applied to
e-consumer behaviour. Graphics, visuals, audio, colour, product presentation at
different levels of resolution, video and 3D displays are among the most common
stimuli. Richard (2005) divided atmospheric cues into central, high task-relevant ones
(including structure, organization, informativeness, effectiveness and navigational),
and a single peripheral, low task-relevant one (entertainment). Consistent with the
Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty and Cacioppo, 1986), the high task-relevant cues
impacted attitude. Both high and low task-relevant cues had a secondary impact on
exploratory purchase intention. Elements that replicate the offline experience lead to
loyal, satisfied customers (Goode and Harris, 2007). Manganari et al. (2009) summarise
the current state of knowledge on web atmospherics in e-retailing in this issue,
illustrated schematically in their Figures 2 and 3 (Manganari et al., 2009). In theory,
atmospherics can also include touch (which can be simulated using a vibrating touch
pad) and aroma (which might be incorporated by offering to send samples, although
odour simulation systems have yet to achieve widespread adoption) (Chicksand and
Knowles, 2002). Summarising:
P13. E-consumer perceptions of e-interactivity will be positively influenced by web E-consumer
atmospherics. behaviour
Environmental psychology suggests that people’s initial response to any environment
is affective, and this emotional impact generally guides the subsequent relations within
the environment (Machleit and Eroglu, 2000; Wakefield and Baker, 1998). Many studies
suggest that web atmospherics are akin to the physical retail environment (e.g. Alba
et al., 1997; Childers et al., 2001). In this issue, Jayawardhena and Wright found that 1129
emotional considerations are one of the main influences on attitudes towards
e-shopping (Jayawardhena and Wright, 2009). Therefore:
P14. E-consumer emotional states will be positively influenced by web

atmospherics.
emotional states.
Situational factors
One of the most significant attractions of e-shopping is perceptions of convenience
(Evanschitzky et al., 2004; Szymanski and Hise, 2000), for example a reduction of
search costs when the consumer is under time pressure (Bakos, 1991; Beatty and Smith,
1987). Kim et al., in this issue, found that convenience was one of the main influences on
e-satisfaction (Kim et al., 2009). Convenience in e-shopping therefore increases search
efficiency by eliminating travel costs and associated frustrations (psychological costs).
e-Retailers differentiate themselves by emphasising convenience (Jayawardhena, 2004).
For example, www.amazon.com allows regular customers to complete the purchase
process with “one click”. Similarly, Amazon have allowed customers to review
products, enhancing the quantity and quality of product information for potential
customers, helping in the customer information search process to reduce search costs
and time. Variety of products is a related aspect of online shopping that also reduces
search costs (Evanschitzky et al., 2004; Grewal et al., 2004).
Retailing literature suggests that shopping frequency may influence purchase
intentions. For example, Evans et al. (2001) found that experienced internet users were
more likely to participate in virtual communities for informational reasons, whereas
novice users were more likely to participate for social interaction. E-shopping becomes
more routine as e-shoppers gain experience of an e-retailer’s site (Liang and Huang,
1998; Overby and Lee, 2006). Hand et al., in this issue, draw attention to the influence of
specific, individual factors such as having a baby (Hand et al., 2009). In sum:
P16. Consumer attitude towards an e-retailer will be influenced by situational
factors such as convenience, variety, frequency of purchase and specific
individual circumstances.
Consumer traits
In the interests of parsimony, we concentrate on four of the most commonly examined
a priori consumer traits – i.e. gender, education, income and age – plus two post hoc
ones relevant to e-attitudes – i.e. need for cognition (NFC) and optimum stimulation
level (OSL) (Richard and Chandra, 2005). The moderating effect of gender can be
explained by drawing on social role theory and evolutionary psychology (Dennis and
EJM McCall, 2005; Saad and Gill, 2000). Men tend to be more task-orientated (Minton and
43,9/10 Schneider, 1980), systems-orientated (Baron-Cohen, 2004) and more willing to take
risks than are women (Powell and Ansic, 1997). This is because, socially, people are
expected to behave in these ways (social role theory) and because this adaptive
behaviour has given people with particular traits advantages in the process of natural
selection (evolutionary psychology). In line with the task-orientation difference,
1130 Venkatesh and Morris (2000) found that men’s decisions to use a computer system
were more influenced by the perceived usefulness than were women’s. On the other
hand, in line with the systems-orientation difference (Felter, 1985), women’s decisions
were more influenced by the ease of use of the system (Venkatesh and Morris, 2000).
Gender moderates the relationship between various aspects of behavioural outcomes
(Cyr and Bonanni, 2005; Yang and Lester, 2005). Psychology research over many years
has identified numerous gender differences that are potentially relevant to e-consumer
behaviour, for example in spatial navigation, perception and styles of communication.
Nevertheless, the effects of these differences in e-consumer behaviour have received
little research attention to date. In a parallel to Dennis and McCall’s (2005)
“hunter-gatherer” approach to shopping behaviour, Stenstrom et al. (2008) use an
evolutionary perspective to study sex differences in website preferences and
navigation. In this interpretation, males tend to use an “internal map” style of
navigation because hunting required accurate navigation over long distances. Females,
on the other hand, tend to use “landmark” navigation because gathering was carried
out over a smaller area close to the home base. E-navigation is analogous because users
must navigate in order to travel through pages, objects and landmarks in a manner
similar to physical navigation. Stenstrom et al.’s (2008) results demonstrate that
extended hierarchical levels of an e-shopping web site are more easily navigated by
males than by females. Extending gender differences previously reported for “bricks”
shopping (Dennis and McCall, 2005) to e-shopping. In this issue, Hansen and Jensen
find that men tend to be “quick shoppers” whereas women are more “shopping for fun”
(Hansen and Jensen, 2009). These results suggest that masculine and feminine
segmented web sites might be more successful in satisfying e-consumers.
The role of education in e-shopping has been given little research attention. It is
argued that people with higher levels of education usually engage more in information
gathering and processing and use more information prior to decision making, whereas
less well educated people rely more on fewer information cues (Capon and Burke, 1980;
Claxton et al., 1974). In contrast to people with lower educational attainments, it is
postulated that better educated consumers feel more comfortable when dealing with,
and relying on, new information (Homburg and Giering, 2001). A body of research
suggests that income is related to e-consumer behaviour (Li et al., 1999; Swinyard and
Smith, 2003). This is expected, as people with higher income have usually achieved
higher levels of education (Farley, 1964). We expect, therefore, that better educated and
wealthier consumers seek alternative information about a particular e-retailer, apart
from their satisfaction level, whereas less well educated, poorer consumers see
satisfaction as an information cue on which to base their purchase decision.
Older consumers are less likely to seek new information (Moskovitch, 1982; Wells
and Gubar, 1966), relying on fewer decision criteria, whereas younger consumers seek
alternative information. Age moderates the links between satisfaction with the product
and loyalty such that these links will be stronger for older consumers (Homburg and E-consumer
Giering, 2001). behaviour
Similarly, individuals with a personality high on NFC engage in more search
activities that lead to greater e-interactivity (Richard and Chandra, 2005), a principle
supported by Kim and Forsythe (2009), who found that consumer innovativeness was
associated with greater use of 3D rotational views. In contrast, high OSL people have a
higher need for environmental stimulation and are more likely to browse, motivated 1131
more by emotion than cognition (Richard and Chandra, 2005).
The various consumer traits will not necessarily have the same moderating effects
but in line with space limitations, we summarise the main expectations as:
P17M1. The relationship between social factors and attitude towards an e-retailer
will be moderated by consumer traits.
P17M2. The relationship between emotion and attitude toward e-retailer will be
moderated by consumer traits.
P17M3. The relationship between e-interactivity and attitude toward e-retailer
will be moderated by consumer traits.
These moderators complete our integrated model, simplified and illustrated
schematically in Figure 2.
Discussion and conclusion

There is a substantial body of literature examining e-consumer behaviour in both
academia and in practitioner publications. Both strands agree that many factors
influence e-shopping. Nevertheless, there are significant gaps in our understanding of
e-consumer behaviour. This paper attempts to fill this gap by conducting an analysis
of the literature and presenting a unified model that explains e-consumer behaviour
that is founded on a sound theoretical underpinning.
We developed a dynamic model to explain e-consumer behaviour in two stages,
underpinned by the Theory of Reasoned Action (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980; Fishbein
and Ajzen, 1975) family of theories, which postulate that that people’s behaviour is
governed by their beliefs, attitudes, and intentions towards performing that behaviour.
We argue that attitudes drive e-consumer behavioural intentions which lead into actual
purchases. This is followed by the development of further propositions for our model.
A significant contribution that our model makes is the appreciation of the image
construct and its influence on e-consumer decision-making process. We enhance our
model by examining the antecedents of attitude and trust, drawing attention to
e-consumer emotional states and e-interactivity along with social factors and consumer
traits. Furthermore, we indicate that situational factors influence behaviour. To
explain consumer emotional states we rely on Mehrabian and Russell’s (1974), S-O-R
model and reason that the stimulus cues such as web atmospherics and navigation are
directly related e-consumer emotional states.
It is acknowledged that building a complex conceptual model “from the ground up”
can pose as many questions as it answers, and we identify fruitful directions for future
research. First, our framework forms a basis to explore holistically the factors affecting
e-consumer behaviour. Second, we acknowledge that our proposed model may not
incorporate all the variables or links between them that potentially affect e-consumer
EJM behaviour and invite researchers to examine more influences. Third, research is needed
43,9/10 into how various constructs might be in play (or not) depending upon the prior
shopping, site familiarity and/or site purchasing experience of consumers. Fourth, we
observe that a large number of studies appear to concentrate on single countries,
whereas consumer responses have been demonstrated to vary between cultures (Davis
et al., 2008). We believe that our conceptual model is an ideal framework for such
1132 purposes for academic researchers, e-retailers, policy-makers and practitioners.
In conclusion, this paper has explored the conceptual development of an integrated
model of e-consumer behaviour. E-shopping is still growing fast at a time when
traditional shopping is struggling to maintain any growth at all. The time is therefore
opportune to further explore the propositions elicited in this paper towards a better
understanding of e-consumer behaviour.
References
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999), “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new
information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 361-91.
Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R. (2000), “Research report: the evolving relationship
between general and specific computer self-efficacy – an empirical assessment”,
Information System Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 418-30.
Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behaviour”, Organisational Behaviours and Human
Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B. and Janiszewski, C. (1997), “Interactive home shopping: consumer,
retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces”, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 38-53.
Babakus, E. and Boller, G.W. (1992), “An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale”, Journal
of Business Research, Vol. 24, pp. 253-68.
Bakos, J.Y. (1991), “A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15,
September, pp. 295-310.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2004), The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain,
Penguin, London.
Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F. and Urban, G.L. (2005), “Are the drivers and role of online trust
the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 133-51.
Beatty, S.A. and Smith, S.M. (1987), “External search effort: an investigation across several
product categories”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, June, pp. 83-95.
Berry, L.L. (1969), “The components of department store image: a theoretical and empirical
analysis”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 3-20.
Bettman, J.R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA.
Bhatnagar, A. and Ghose, S. (2004), “Online information search termination patterns across
product categories and consumer demographics”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 80 No. 3,
pp. 221-8.
Boulding, K.E. (1956), The Image, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
British Retail Consortium (2008), “BRC-KPMG Retail Sales Monitor November 2008”, British E-consumer
Retail Consortium, London, 9 December, available at: www.brc.org.uk posted (accessed
9 December 2008). behaviour
Brown, M., Pope, N. and Voges, K. (2003), “Buying or browsing? An exploration of shopping
orientations and online purchase intention”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37
No. 10/11, pp. 1666-84.
Capon, N. and Burke, M. (1980), “Individual, product class, and task-related factors in consumer 1133
information processing”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 314-30.
Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L. and Sherrell, D.L. (2002), “Enticing online consumers: an extended
technology acceptance perspective”, Information and Management, Vol. 39 No. 8,

pp. 705-19.
Chen, P. and Hitt, L. (2002), “Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer
retention in internet enabled businesses: a study of online brokerage industry”,
Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 255-74.
Chen, Y.-H. and Barnes, S. (2007), “Initial trust and online buyer behaviour”, Industrial
Management & Data Systems, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 21-36.
Cheung, C.M.K., Chan, G.W.W. and Limayem, M. (2005), “A critical review of online consumer
behaviour: empirical research”, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organisations, Vol. 3
No. 4, pp. 1-19.
Chicksand, L. and Knowles, R. (2002), “Overcoming the difficulties of selling ‘look and feel’ goods
online: implications for web site design”.
Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J. and Carson, S. (2001), “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for
online retail shopping behaviour”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77 No. 4, pp. 511-35.
Claxton, J.D., Fry, J.N. and Portis, B. (1974), “A taxonomy of prepurchase information gathering
patterns”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 35-42.
Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. (1995), “Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and
initial test”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 189-211.
Cyr, D. and Bonanni, C. (2005), “Gender and web site design in e-business”, International Journal
of Electronic Business, Vol. 3 No. 6, pp. 60-71.
Dailey, L. (2004), “Navigational web atmospherics: explaining the influence of restrictive
navigation cues”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 7, pp. 795-803.
Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1992), “Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use
computers in the workplace”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 14,
pp. 1109-30.
Davis, L., Wang, S. and Lindridge, A. (2008), “Culture influences on emotional responses to
on-line store atmospheric cues”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61, pp. 806-12.
Deloitte (2007), “All things bright and digital: shopping online and demand for high-tech items
sees huge lift”, Deloitte, London.
Dennis, C. (2005), Objects of Desire: Consumer Behaviour in Shopping Centre Choice, Palgrave,
London.
Dennis, C. and McCall, A. (2005), “The savannah hypothesis of shopping”, Business Strategy
Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 12-16.
Dennis, C., Fenech, T. and Merrilees, B. (2004), E-retailing, Routledge, Abingdon and New York,
NY.
EJM Dennis, C., Harris, L. and Sandhu, B. (2002a), “From bricks to clicks: understanding the
e-consumer”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 5 No. 4,
43,9/10 pp. 281-90.
Dennis, C., Murphy, J., Marsland, D., Cockett, W. and Patel, T. (2002b), “Measuring image:
shopping centre case studies”, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer
Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 353-73.
1134 Devaraj, S., Fan, M. and Kohli, R. (2002), “Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and
preference: validating e-commerce metrics”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 3,
pp. 316-33.
Donthu, N. and Garcia, A. (1999), “The internet shopper”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39
No. 3, pp. 52-8.
Engel, J., Kollatt, D. and Blackwell, P. (1993), Consumer Behavior, 8th ed., Dryden Press, New
York, NY.
Eroglu, S.A., Macleit, K.A. and Davis, L.M. (2003), “Empirical testing of a model of online store
atmospherics and shopper responses”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 139-50.
Eurofood (2000), “Tesco’s the world’s largest e-grocer”, Eurofood, 6 July.
Evans, M., Wedande, W., Ralston, L. and van t’Hul, S. (2001), “Consumer interaction in the virtual
era: some qualitative insights”, Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 150-9.
Evanschitzky, H., Iyer, G.R., Hesse, J. and Ahlert, D. (2004), “E-satisfaction: a re-examination”,
Journal of Retailing, Vol. 80 No. 3, pp. 239-47.
Farley, J.U. (1964), “Why does brand loyalty vary over products?”, Journal of Marketing
Felter, M. (1985), “Sex differences on the California statewide assessment of computer literacy”,
Sex Roles, Vol. 13, pp. 181-92.
Fiore, A.M., Jin, H. and Kim, J. (2005), “For fun and profit: hedonic value from image interactivity
and responses toward an online store”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 669-94.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to
Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Fortin, D.R., Dholakia, R.R. and Dholakia, N. (2002), “Introduction to special issue: emerging
issues in electronic marketing: thinking outside the square”, Journal of Business Research,
Vol. 55 No. 8, pp. 623-7.
Goode, M.M.H. and Harris, L.C. (2007), “Online behavioural intentions: an empirical investigation
of antecedents and moderators”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 No. 5/6, pp. 512-36.
Grewal, D., Iyer, G.R. and Levy, M. (2004), “Internet retailing: enablers, limiters and market
consequences”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 7, pp. 703-13.
Hand, C., Dall’Olmo Riley, F., Harris, P., Singh, J. and Rettie, R. (2009), “Online grocery shopping:
the influence of situational factors”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 9/10,
pp. 1205-19.
Hansen, T. and Jensen, J.M. (2009), “Shopping orientation and online clothing purchases: the role
of gender and purchase situation”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 9/10,
pp. 1154-70.
Harris, L. and Dennis, C. (2008), Marketing the e-Business, 2nd ed., Routledge, Abingdon and New
York, NY.
Hoffman, D.L. and Novak, T.P. (1996), “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated
environments: conceptual foundations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 50-68.
Homburg, C. and Giering, A. (2001), “Personal characteristics as moderators of the relationship E-consumer
between customer satisfaction and loyalty – an empirical analysis”, Psychology &
Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 43-70. behaviour
Huang, W.-Y., Schrank, H. and Dubinsky, A.J. (2004), “Effect of brand name on consumers’ risk
perceptions of online shopping”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 40-50.
IMRG/Capgemini (2008), “IMRG Capgemini Sales Index: November 2008”, IMRG Capgemini,
London, 19 November, available at www.imrg.org (accessed 3 December 2008). 1135
Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Todd, P.A. (1997), “Is there a future for retailing on the internet?”,
in Peterson, R.A. (Ed.), Electronic Marketing and the Consumer, Sage Publications,
Thousand Oaks, CA.

Jayawardhena, C. (2004), “The hierarchical influence of personal values on e-shopping attitude
and behaviour”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, Vol. 14
No. 2, pp. 127-42.
Jayawardhena, C. and Wright, L.T. (2009), “An empirical investigation into e-shopping
excitement: antecedents and effects”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 9/10,
pp. 1171-87.
Jayawardhena, C., Wright, L.-T. and Dennis, C. (2007), “Consumers online: intentions,
orientations and segmentation”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 515-26.
Johnson, E.J., Moe, W.W., Fader, P.S., Bellman, S. and Lohse, G.L. (2007), “On the depth and
dynamics of online search behaviour”, Management Science, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 299-309.
Jones, J.M. and Vijayasarathy, L.R. (1998), “Internet consumer catalog shopping: findings from an
exploratory study and directions for future research”, Internet Research, Vol. 8 No. 4,
pp. 322-30.
Kim, J. and Forsythe, S. (2009), “Adoption of sensory enabling technology for online apparel
shopping”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 9/10, pp. 1101-20.
Kim, J.-H., Kim, M. and Kandampully, J. (2009), “Buying environment characteristics in the
context of e-service”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 9/10, pp. 1188-204.
Kimber, C. (2001), Researching Online Buying’s Offline Impact, CACI, London.
Kolsaker, A., Lee-Kelley, L. and Choy, P.C. (2004), “The reluctant Hong Kong consumer:
purchasing travel online”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 28 No. 3,
pp. 295-309.
Kooli, K., Wright, L.-T., Broderick, A. and Chen, Y.-L. (2007), “Marketing communications and
customer attitudes towards SSTs in banking”, Academy of Marketing 21st Service
Workshop Proceedings, University of Westminster, London, pp. 54-7.
Korgaonkar, P.K. and Wolin, L.D. (1999), “A multivariate analysis of web usage”, Journal of
Advertising Research, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 53-68.
Kuehn, A.A. (1962), “Consumer brand choice – a learning process?”, Journal of Advertising
Research, Vol. 2, pp. 10-17.
Laroche, M., Yang, Z., McDougall, G.H.G. and Bergeron, J. (2005), “Internet versus bricks and
mortar retailers: an investigation into intangibility and its consequences”, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 81 No. 4, pp. 251-67.
Lee, K.S. and Tan, S.J.T. (2003), “E-retailing versus physical retailing: a theoretical model and
empirical test of consumer choice”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56 No. 11, pp. 877-85.
Lee, M.K.O. and Turban, E. (2001), “A trust model for consumer internet shopping”, International
Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 75-91.
EJM Liang, T.P. and Huang, J.S. (1998), “An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in
electronic markets: a transaction cost model”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 24 No. 1,
43,9/10 pp. 29-43.
Liao, Z. and Cheung, M.T. (2002), “Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical
study”, Information and Management, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 287-301.
Lindquist, J.D. (1974), “Meaning of image: a survey of empirical and hypothetical evidence”,
1136 Journal of Retailing, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 29-38, 116.
Loiacono, E.T., Watson, R.T. and Goodhue, D.L. (2002), “WEBQUAL: a measure of web site
quality”, in Evans, K. and Scheer, L. (Eds), 2002 Marketing Educators’ Conference:
Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, pp. 432-7.

Lynch, P.D. and Beck, J.C. (2001), “Profiles of internet buyers in 20 countries: evidence for
region-specific strategies”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32 No. 4,
pp. 725-48.
McKinney, V., Yoon, K. and Zahedi, F. (2002), “The measurement of web-customer satisfaction:
an expectation and disconfirmation approach”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13
No. 3, pp. 296-315.
Machleit, K.A. and Eroglu, S.A. (2000), “Describing and measuring emotional response to
shopping experience”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 49, pp. 101-11.
Manganari, E.E., Siomkos, G.J. and Vrechopoulos, A.P. (2009), “Store atmosphere in web
retailing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 9/10, pp. 1140-53.
Martineau, P. (1958), “The personality of the retail store”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 36 No. 1,
pp. 47-55.
Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974), An Approach to Environmental Psychology, MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Merrilees, B. and Fry, M. (2002), “Corporate branding: a framework for e-retailers”, Corporate
Reputation Review, Vol. 5 No. 2/3, pp. 213-27.
Minton, H.L. and Schneider, F.W. (1980), Differential Psychology, Waveland Press, Prospect
Heights, IL.
Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.-G. (2001), “Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context”,
Information and Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 217-30.
Moskovitch, M. (1982), “Neuropsychological approach to perception and memory in normal and
pathological aging”, in Craik, F.I.M. and Trehum, S. (Eds), Aging and Cognitive Processes,
Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 55-78.
Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L. and Yung, Y. (2000), “Measuring the customer experience in online
environments: a structural modeling approach”, Marketing Science, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 22-42.
Overby, J.W. and Lee, E.-J. (2006), “The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value
on consumer preference and intentions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59 No. 10/11,
pp. 1160-6.
Oxford Internet Institute (2005), Oxford Internet Survey: Results of a Nationwide Survey of
Britons aged 14 and Older, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford.
Palmer, J.W. (2002), “Web site usability, design, and performance metrics”, Information Systems
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for
measuring consumer perceptions of service quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1,
pp. 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Malhotra, A. (2005), “E-S-QUAL: a multiple-item scale for E-consumer
assessing electronic service quality”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 213-33.
behaviour
Parsons, A.G. (2002), “Non-functional motives for online shoppers: why we click”, Journal of
Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 380-92.
Perea y Monsuwé, T., Dellaert, B.D.C. and de Ruyter, K. (2004), “What drives consumers to shop
online? A literature review”, International Journal of Service Industries Management,
Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 102-21. 1137
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), “The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion”,
in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, Academic
Press, New York, NY, pp. 123-205.

Powell, M. and Ansic, D. (1997), “Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial
decision-making: an experimental analysis”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 18
No. 6, pp. 605-28.
Richard, M.-O. (2005), “Modeling the impact of internet atmospherics on surfer behavior”, Journal
of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 12, pp. 1632-42.
Richard, M.-O. and Chandra, R. (2005), “A model of consumer web navigational behavior:
conceptual development and application”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58,
pp. 1019-29.
Rohm, A.J. and Swaminathan, V. (2004), “A typology of online shoppers based on shopping
motivations”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 7, pp. 748-57.
Saad, G. and Gill, T. (2000), “Applications of evolutionary psychology in marketing”, Psychology
and Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 1005-34.
Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P. (1988), “The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis
of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research”, Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 15, pp. 325-43.
Stenstrom, E., Stenstrom, P., Saad, G. and Cheikhrouhou, S. (2008), “Online hunting and
gathering: an evolutionary perspective on sex differences in web site preferences and
navigation”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 155-68.
Stern, B.B. and Stafford, M.R. (2006), “Individual and social determinants of winning bids in
online auctions”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 43-55.
Swaminathan, V., Lepkowska-White, E. and Rao, B.P. (1999), “Browsers or buyers in cyberspace?
An investigation of factors influencing electronic exchange”, Journal of
Computer-mediated Communication, Vol. 5 No. 2.
Swinyard, W.R. and Smith, S.M. (2003), “Why people (don’t) shop online: a lifestyle study of the
internet consumer”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 567-97.
Szymanski, D.M. and Hise, R.T. (2000), “e-Satisfaction: an initial examination”, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 309-22.
Tauber, E.M. (1972), “Why do people shop?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36, October, pp. 46-59.
Teas, R.K. (1993), “Expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality:
an assessment of a reassessment”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, January, pp. 132-9.
Venkatesh, V. (2000), “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic
motivation and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field
studies”, Information System Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-65.
Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000), “Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender,
social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour”, MIS
Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 115-39.
EJM Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information
technology: towards a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 425-78.
43,9/10
Wakefield, K.L. and Baker, J. (1998), “Excitement at the mall: determinants and effects on
shopping response”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 74 No. 4, p. 515.
Wells, W. and Gubar, G. (1966), “Life cycle concept in marketing research”, Journal of Marketing
Research, Vol. 3, November, pp. 355-63.
1138 Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M.C. (2002), “.comQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting
quality of the e-tail experience”, Working Paper No. 02-100, Marketing Science Institute,
Cambridge, MA.
Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M.C. (2003), “eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting
e-tail quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 183-98.
Wright, L.T. (2008), “Qualitative research”, in Baker, M. (Ed.), The Marketing Textbook, 6th ed.,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 156-69.
Wu, G. (1999), “Perceived interactivity and attitude toward web site”, paper presented at the 1999
Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Albuquerque, NM.
Yang, B. and Lester, D. (2005), “Gender differences in e-commerce”, Applied Economics, Vol. 37
No. 18, pp. 2081-97.
Yoo, B. and Donthu, N. (2001), “Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet
shopping site (SITEQUAL)”, Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 2 No. 1,
pp. 31-47.
Zeithaml, V.A. (1981), “How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services”,
in Donnolly, J. and George, W. (Eds), The Marketing of Services, American Marketing
Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 186-90.
Zhang, P. and Von Dran, G.M. (2002), “User expectations and rankings of quality factors in
different web site domains”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6 No. 2,
pp. 9-33.
Zhou, L., Dai, L. and Zhang, D. (2007), “Online shopping acceptance model – a critical survey of
consumer factors in online shopping”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 8
No. 1, pp. 41-62.
Further reading
Alsajjan, B. and Dennis, C.E. (2009), “The internet banking acceptance model”, Journal of
Business Research (forthcoming).
About the authors

Charles Dennis is a Senior Lecturer at Brunel University, London, UK. His teaching and research
area is (e-)retail and consumer behaviour – the vital final link of the marketing process –
satisfying the end consumer. He is a Chartered Marketer and has been elected a Fellow of the
Chartered Institute of Marketing for work helping to modernise the teaching of the discipline. He
was awarded the Vice Chancellor’s Award for Teaching Excellence for improving the interactive
student learning experience. His publications include Marketing the e-Business (1st and 2nd
editions) (joint-authored with Dr Lisa Harris), the research-based e-Retailing (joint-authored with
Professor Bill Merrilees and Dr Tino Fenech) and the research monograph Objects of Desire:
Consumer Behaviour in Shopping Centre Choice. His research into shopping styles has received
extensive coverage in the popular media. Charles Dennis is the corresponding author and can be
contacted at: charles.dennis@brunel.ac.uk
Bill Merrilees is Professor of Marketing and Deputy Head of the Department of Marketing at E-consumer
Griffith Business School, based on the Gold Coast campus. He is also associated with the
Tourism, Sport and Service Innovation Research Centre. He has worked in both academia and behaviour
the government. He has a Bachelor of Commerce (Hons I) from the University of Newcastle,
Australia and an MA and PhD from the University of Toronto, Canada. He has consulted with
companies like Shell, Westpac, Jones Lang Lasalle at the large end, down to middle-sized
companies like accountants and even very small firms like florists. Bill particularly enjoys
conducting case research as it builds a bridge to the real world. He has published more than 100 1139
refereed journal articles or book chapters. Six of his articles have been in the e-commerce field,
including the Journal of Relationship Marketing, Journal of Business Strategies, Corporate
Reputation Review and Marketing Intelligence & Planning. His work includes innovative scale
development in the areas of e-interactivity, e-branding, e-strategy and e-trust.
Chanaka Jayawardhena is Lecturer in Marketing at Loughborough University Business
School, UK. He has won numerous research awards including two Best Paper Awards at the
Academy of Marketing Conference in 2003 and 2004. Previous publications have appeared (or
forthcoming) in the Industrial Marketing Management, European Journal of Marketing, Journal
of Marketing Management, Journal of General Management, Journal of Internet Research and
European Business Review, among others.
Len Tiu Wright is Professor of Marketing and Research Professor at De Montfort University,
Leicester. She has held full-time appointments and visiting appointments in the UK and
overseas. Her writings have appeared in books, in American and European academic journals,
and at conferences where some have gained best paper awards for overall best conference papers
and best-in-track papers. She is on the editorial boards of a number of leading marketing journals
and is Editor of the Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, an Emerald
publication.
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com

Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
This article has been cited by:
1. Sandra M.C. Loureiro, Luisa Cavallero, Francisco Javier Miranda. 2018. Fashion brands on retail websites:
Customer performance expectancy and e-word-of-mouth. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 41,
131-141. [Crossref]
2. Ana Javornik. Directions for Studying User Experience with Augmented Reality in Public 199-210.
[Crossref]
3. Manit Mishra. 2018. For Indian online shoppers, have saying and doing parted ways?. Psychology &
Marketing 35:1, 5-19. [Crossref]
4. Weng Marc Lim. 2017. Untangling the relationships between consumer characteristics, shopping values,
and behavioral intention in online group buying. Journal of Strategic Marketing 25:7, 547-566. [Crossref]
5. Syed Sardar Muhammad, Bidit Lal Dey, Vishanth Weerakkody. 2017. Analysis of Factors that Influence
Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of
Literature. Information Systems Frontiers 10. . [Crossref]
6. Javier A. Sánchez-Torres, Francisco Javier Arroyo-Cañada, Alexander Varon-Sandoval, James Ariel
Sánchez-Alzate. 2017. Differences between e-commerce buyers and non-buyers in Colombia: The
moderating effect of educational level and socioeconomic status on electronic purchase intention. DYNA
84:202, 175-189. [Crossref]
7. Sarbjit Singh Bedi, Sukhwinder Kaur, Amit Kumar Lal. 2017. Understanding Web Experience and
Perceived Web Enjoyment as Antecedents of Online Purchase Intention. Global Business Review 18:2,
465-477. [Crossref]
8. Sanchez TorresJavier A., Javier A. Sanchez Torres, Arroyo-CañadaFrancisco-Javier, Francisco-Javier
Arroyo-Cañada. 2017. Building brand loyalty in e-commerce of fashion lingerie. Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management: An International Journal 21:1, 103-114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
9. PapagiannidisSavvas, Savvas Papagiannidis, PantanoEleonora, Eleonora Pantano, See-ToEric W.K., Eric
W.K. See-To, DennisCharles, Charles Dennis, BourlakisMichael, Michael Bourlakis. 2017. To immerse
or not? Experimenting with two virtual retail environments. Information Technology & People 30:1,
163-188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
10. Rosemary Matikiti, Mercy Mpinganjira, Mornay Roberts-Lombard. 2017. Social media in tourism:
Establishing factors influencing attitudes towards the usage of social networking sites for trip organisation.
Acta Commercii 17:1. . [Crossref]
11. Wilson Ozuem, Michael Borrelli, Geoff Lancaster. 2017. Leveraging the co-evolution of offline and online
video games: an empirical study. Journal of Strategic Marketing 25:1, 75-97. [Crossref]
12. Fanny Reniou, Ziad Malas, Thierry Delécolle, Pierre Desmet. When and Where to Prompt for an Online
Promotional Code to Avoid Cart Abandonment 556-559. [Crossref]
13. Jalayer Khalilzadeh, Ahmet Bulent Ozturk, Anil Bilgihan. 2017. Security-related factors in extended
UTAUT model for NFC based Mobile Payment in the Restaurant Industry. Computers in Human Behavior
. [Crossref]
14. Ilona Skačkauskienė, Neringa Vilkaitė-Vaitonė. Paslaugų vartotojų lojalumas . [Crossref]
15. Mirela Mihić, Ivana Kursan Milaković. 2017. Examining shopping enjoyment: personal factors, word
of mouth and moderating effects of demographics. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30:1,
1300-1317. [Crossref]
16. Francesca Di Virgilio, Angelo A. Camillo, Isabell C. Camillo. 2017. The Impact of Social Network on
Italian Users' Behavioural Intention for the Choice of a Medical Tourist Destination. International Journal
of Tourism and Hospitality Management in the Digital Age 1:1, 36-49. [Crossref]
17. Dung H. Nguyen, Sander de Leeuw, Wout E.H. Dullaert. 2016. Consumer Behaviour and Order
Fulfilment in Online Retailing: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews .
[Crossref]
18. Abubakar Mohammed Abubakar, Mustafa Ilkan. 2016. Impact of online WOM on destination trust and
intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 5:3,
192-201. [Crossref]
19. DemangeotCatherine, Catherine Demangeot, BroderickAmanda J., Amanda J. Broderick. 2016. Engaging
customers during a website visit: a model of website customer engagement. International Journal of Retail
& Distribution Management 44:8, 814-839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. Ana Javornik. 2016. ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural
responses to augmented reality applications. Journal of Marketing Management 32:9-10, 987-1011.
[Crossref]
21. SihvonenJenniina, Jenniina Sihvonen, TurunenLinda Lisa Maria, Linda Lisa Maria Turunen. 2016. As
good as new – valuing fashion brands in the online second-hand markets. Journal of Product & Brand
Management 25:3, 285-295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
22. Shabnam Doosti, Mohammad Reza Jalilvand, Ali Asadi, Javad Khazaei Pool, Parisa Mehrani Adl. 2016.
Analyzing the influence of electronic word of mouth on visit intention: the mediating role of tourists’
attitude and city image. International Journal of Tourism Cities 2:2, 137-148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
23. Ana Javornik. 2016. Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media
characteristics on consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 30, 252-261. [Crossref]
24. Joel Järvinen, Heini Taiminen. 2016. Harnessing marketing automation for B2B content marketing.
Industrial Marketing Management 54, 164-175. [Crossref]
25. Sheau-Fen Yap, Sanjaya Singh Gaur. 2016. Integrating functional, social, and psychological determinants
to explain online social networking usage. Behaviour & Information Technology 35:3, 166-183. [Crossref]
26. Andreas Chatzidakis, Sally Hibbert, Heidi Winklhofer. 2016. Are consumers’ reasons for and against
behaviour distinct?. European Journal of Marketing 50:1/2, 124-144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
27. Janette Hanekom, Rachel Barker. 2016. Theoretical criteria for online consumer behaviour: web-based
communication exposure and internal psychological behavioural processes approaches. Communicatio
42:1, 75-99. [Crossref]
28. V. K. Kool, Rita Agrawal. Technology and Hedonism 253-304. [Crossref]
29. M. Mahdi Roghanizad, Derrick J. Neufeld. 2015. Intuition, risk, and the formation of online trust.
Computers in Human Behavior 50, 489-498. [Crossref]
30. Sahar Karimi, K. Nadia Papamichail, Christopher P. Holland. 2015. The effect of prior knowledge and
decision-making style on the online purchase decision-making process: A typology of consumer shopping
behaviour. Decision Support Systems 77, 137-147. [Crossref]
31. Weng Marc Lim. 2015. The Influence of Internet Advertising and Electronic Word of Mouth on
Consumer Perceptions and Intention: Some Evidence from Online Group Buying. Journal of Computer
Information Systems 55:4, 81-89. [Crossref]
32. Weng Marc Lim. 2015. Antecedents and consequences of e-shopping: an integrated model. Internet
Research 25:2, 184-217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
33. Jin Baek Kim. 2015. A Fixed Pricing Group Buying Decision Model. International Journal of E-Business
Research 11:2, 40-59. [Crossref]
34. Talal M.I. Alsaif, Ahmad Ghoneim. Trust Transference from Brick to Click Retailers: A Conceptual
Model for Impersonal Trust 3336-3343. [Crossref]
35. Kholoud Al-Qeisi, Charles Dennis, Eleftherios Alamanos, Chanaka Jayawardhena. 2014. Website design
quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Journal of Business
Research 67:11, 2282-2290. [Crossref]
36. Dimitrios Maditinos, Dimitrios Chatzoudes, Lazaros Sarigiannidis. 2014. Factors affecting e-business
successful implementation. International Journal of Commerce and Management 24:4, 300-320. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
37. David E. Williams. 2014. Integrating the conceptual domains of social commerce: a meta-theoretical
perspective. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 24:4, 361-410.
[Crossref]
38. Niall Piercy. 2014. Online service quality: Content and process of analysis. Journal of Marketing
Management 30:7-8, 747-785. [Crossref]
39. Sajad Rezaei, Muslim Amin, Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail. 2014. Online repatronage intention:
an empirical study among Malaysian experienced online shoppers. International Journal of Retail &
Distribution Management 42:5, 390-421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
40. Victoria Insley, Daniel Nunan. 2014. Gamification and the online retail experience. International Journal
of Retail & Distribution Management 42:5, 340-351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
41. Seyedeh Marjan Mahdavi Anari, Roliana Ibrahim, Aryati Bakri. Understanding factors on the customer
intention behavior through Facebook commerce: A conceptual model 107-112. [Crossref]
42. Sheau Fen Crystal Yap, Christina Kwai Choi Lee. 2014. Leveraging the power of online social networks:
a contingency approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 32:3, 345-374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
43. Irena Račinskaja, Jurgita Raudeliūnienė. 2014. The Research of Electronic Life Insurance Business
Development Factors in The Context of Integration. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis 6:1, 111-119. [Crossref]
44. Arnoldina Pabedinskaitė. 2014. E-Commerce in Lithuania. Economics and Business 24:24, 113. [Crossref]
45. Chao-Min Chiu, Eric T. G. Wang, Yu-Hui Fang, Hsin-Yi Huang. 2014. Understanding customers' repeat
purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk.
Information Systems Journal 24:1, 85-114. [Crossref]
46. Vida Davidavičienė, Jolanta Sabaitytė, Sigitas Davidavičius, Michail Potapov. 2014. Interaction with
Customers Using Website Tools: Analysis of Lithuanian Manufacturing Sector. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences 110, 1262-1270. [Crossref]
47. Begoña Peral Peral, Jorge Arenas Gaitán, María Ángeles Ramón-Jerónimo. 2014. Technology Acceptance
Model y mayores: ¿la educación y la actividad laboral desarrollada son variables moderadoras?. Revista
Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC 18:1, 43-56. [Crossref]
48. Saleh Mohamed Fadel Bukhari, Ahmad Ghoneim, Charles Dennis, Bothina Jamjoom. 2013. The
antecedents of travellers’ e-satisfaction and intention to buy airline tickets online. Journal of Enterprise
Information Management 26:6, 624-641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
49. Liu Ling-han, Qi Jia-yin, Yu Chao-yang. How does praise and rumor spread online? Analyzing user
relationships on social networks: A case study of Haidilao 57-65. [Crossref]
50. Vanessa Ratten. 2013. Exploring Behaviors and Perceptions Affecting the Adoption of Cloud Computing.
International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy 4:3, 51-68. [Crossref]
51. Mohammad Reza Jalilvand, Abolghasem Ebrahimi, Neda Samiei. 2013. Electronic Word of Mouth Effects
on Tourists’ Attitudes Toward Islamic Destinations and Travel Intention: An Empirical Study in Iran.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 81, 484-489. [Crossref]
52. Hina Khan. Consumer Buying Behaviour 71-102. [Crossref]
53. Vaggelis Saprikis. 2013. A Longitudinal Investigation on Greek University Students’ Perceptions Towards
Online Shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 11:1, 43-62. [Crossref]
54. Mohammad Reza Jalilvand, Neda Samiei, Behrooz Dini, Parisa Yaghoubi Manzari. 2012. Examining the
structural relationships of electronic word of mouth, destination image, tourist attitude toward destination
and travel intention: An integrated approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 1:1-2,
134-143. [Crossref]
55. Mohammad Reza Jalilvand, Neda Samiei. 2012. The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism
destination choice. Internet Research 22:5, 591-612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
56. Iuliana Cetină, Maria-Cristiana Munthiu, Violeta Rădulescu. 2012. Psychological and Social Factors that
Influence Online Consumer Behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62, 184-188. [Crossref]
57. Arnoldina Pabedinskaitė, Viktorija Šliažaitė. 2012. Vartotojų elgsena elektroninėje prekyboje. Verslas:
teorija ir praktika 13:4, 352-364. [Crossref]
58. Amira Trabelsi Zoghlami, Mourad Touzani. 2012. An Examination of the Factors Influencing Consumers’
Visit of C2C Websites. International Journal of Online Marketing 2:3, 52-69. [Crossref]
59. Helen McCormick, Charlotte Livett. 2012. Analysing the influence of the presentation of fashion
garments on young consumers’ online behaviour. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An
International Journal 16:1, 21-41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
60. Frank Goethals, Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Yazgi Tütüncü. 2012. French consumers' perceptions
of the unattended delivery model for e-grocery retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 19:1,
133-139. [Crossref]
61. Christoph Teller, Herbert Kotzab, David B. Grant. 2012. The relevance of shopper logistics for consumers
of store-based retail formats. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 19:1, 59-66. [Crossref]
62. Lisa Harris, Charles Dennis. 2011. Engaging customers on Facebook: Challenges for e-retailers. Journal
of Consumer Behaviour 10:6, 338-346. [Crossref]
63. Ching‐Jui Keng, Hui‐Ying Ting, Ya‐Ting Chen. 2011. Effects of virtual‐experience combinations on
consumer‐related “sense of virtual community”. Internet Research 21:4, 408-434. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
64. Ibrahim Sirkeci, Lóa Bára Magnúsdóttir. 2011. Understanding illegal music downloading in the UK: a
multi‐attribute model. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 5:1, 90-110. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
65. Kelly Page, DK, Mark Mapstone. 2010. How does the web make youth feel? Exploring the positive digital
native rhetoric. Journal of Marketing Management 26:13-14, 1345-1366. [Crossref]
66. Neil F. Doherty, Fiona Ellis‐Chadwick. 2010. Internet retailing: the past, the present and the future.
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 38:11/12, 943-965. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
67. Charles Dennis, Chanaka Jayawardhena, Eleni-Konstantina Papamatthaiou. 2010. Antecedents of internet
shopping intentions and the moderating effects of substitutability. The International Review of Retail,
Distribution and Consumer Research 20:4, 411-430. [Crossref]
68. Panos E. Kourouthanassis, Christos K. Georgiadis, Efpraxia Zamani, George M. Giaglis. Explaining the
Adoption of Mobile Internet Applications 148-153. [Crossref]
69. Wilson Ozuem, Michael Borrelli. Consumer Attitudes toward Online Video Game Purchases 1609-1638.
[Crossref]
70. Francesca Di Virgilio, Angelo A. Camillo, Isabell C. Camillo. The Impact of Social Network on Italian
Users' Behavioural Intention for the Choice of a Medical Tourist Destination 232-247. [Crossref]
71. Saïd Aboubaker Ettis, Afef Ben Zin El Abidine. Consumer Behavior in M-Commerce 264-287. [Crossref]
72. Masoud Mohammadian. Intelligent Decision Making and Risk Analysis of B2c E-Commerce Customer
Satisfaction 969-986. [Crossref]
73. António C. Moreira, Mariana Mira Ferreira, Pedro Macedo. Virtual Atmosphere, Emotions, Attitudes
and Real Use 172-206. [Crossref]
74. Wilson Ozuem, Michael Borrelli. Consumer Attitudes toward Online Video Game Purchases 83-112.
[Crossref]
75. Amira Trabelsi Zoghlami, Mourad Touzani. An Examination of the Factors Influencing Consumers' Visit
of C2C Websites 1786-1805. [Crossref]
76. Begoña Peral-Peral, Ángel F. Villarejo-Ramos, Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco. Gender Differences in the
Technology’s Classic Models in Social Network Sites 126-142. [Crossref]

Dennis2018 Econsummer Behaviour

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Dennis2018 Econsummer Behaviour

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

European Journal of Marketing

behaviour", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 Issue: 9/10, pp.1121-1139, https://

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Loughborough University Business School, Loughborough University, Revised February 2008

Factors influencing e-consumer behaviour

The role of functional attributes

evaluation or rating of something in such a way as to guide our actions (Boulding,

to purchase from an e-retailer.

Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (Venkatesh et al., 2003). As introduced in

The enhanced model

Experiential aspects of e-shopping

interactivity was the most important determinant of consumer attitudes to a particular

P14. E-consumer emotional states will be positively influenced by web

Discussion and conclusion

technology acceptance perspective”, Information and Management, Vol. 39 No. 8,

Thousand Oaks, CA.

Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, pp. 432-7.

Press, New York, NY, pp. 123-205.

About the authors

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi