Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
R1128
findings, and it is further supported by witnessed by several colleagues who Supplemental Data
a computer-based perimetry test in applauded spontaneously when he Supplemental data are available at http://
which no sparing was found. completed the course. This was filmed www.current-biology.com/supplemental/
Behaviorally, TN was blind across and is available as a video clip in the S0960-9822(08)01433-4
the whole visual field. He walked Supplemental Data available on-line
like a blind man, using his stick with this issue. Acknowledgments
to track obstacles and requiring There is evidence suggesting that We wish to thank T.N. for his co-operation
guidance by another person when blind or blindfolded sighted subjects and P. Pullens for help in DTI processing.
walking around the various laboratory are able, to some extent, to use the This study was partly supported by a grant
buildings during testing. He was natural auditory obstacle sense to from the SNSF (32-109928) to A.P., a grant
not cognitively impaired except for locate a travel path, although auditory from the EU (FP6-2005-NEST-Path Imp
some mild word- finding difficulty. guidance is notably inferior to visual 043403-COBOL) to B.d.G., by the McDonnell
OCNC to L.W., and by a Veni grant from
Psychophysical tests specifically guidance and deteriorates markedly
NWO (451-07-032) to M.T.
designed to assess the blind fields when small targets are used to define
of subjects with cortical blindness the travel path [8]. Therefore, the
[3,4], including detection of the theoretical possibility that TN was References
1. Hamm, A.O., Weike, A.I., Schupp, H.T., Treig,
presence/absence of big targets in an guided by echolocation abilities from T., Dressel, A., and Kessler, C. (2003). Affective
alternative forced-choice task, proved reflection of sound waves, rather blindsight: intact fear conditioning to a visual
cue in a cortically blind patient. Brain 126,
completely negative; no residual than by unacknowledged visual 267–275.
visual function could be found. He inputs, cannot be totally ruled out. 2. Pegna, A.J., Khateb, A., Lazeyras, F., and
showed some evidence of visuo- Nevertheless, this appears as an Seghier, M.L. (2005). Discriminating emotional
faces without primary visual cortices involves
motor integration in spatially-guided extremely remote possibility in the the right amygdala. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 24–25.
reaching. Furthermore, he was able to present case, as neither TN nor the 3. Sahraie, A., Trevethan, C.T., and MacLeod,
M.J. (2008). Temporal properties of spatial
discriminate the difference between a experimenter following behind him channel of processing in hemianopia.
long rod randomly placed in horizontal emitted any detected sound during Neuropsychologia 46, 879–885.
or non-horizontal positions, with a navigation that might have generated 4. Sahraie, A., Trevethan, C.T., Weiskrantz,
L., Olson, J., MacLeod, M.J., Murray, A.D.,
difference threshold of approximately sound waves reverberation from the Dijkhuizen, R.S., Counsell, C., and Coleman, R.
25°. This, as it happens, was one of objects laying on the floor. Moreover, (2003). Spatial channels of visual processing
in cortical blindness. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18,
the very first behavioral tests that the spatial resolution that can be 1189–1196.
revealed DB’s residual capacities in obtained through any echolocation 5. Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E.K., Sanders,
informal testing [5,6]. capacity in humans is significantly M.D., and Marshall, J. (1974). Visual capacity
in the hemianopic field following a restricted
The DTI results (carried out by below that necessary to explain TN’s occipital ablation. Brain 97, 709–728.
Rainer Goebel and colleagues in accurate navigation performance 6. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A Case Study
and Implications (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Maastricht) showed a severe loss of through small objects, as can be 7. Bridge, H., Thomas, O., Jbabdi, S., and Cowey,
posterior callosal fibers connecting observed in the video [9,10]. A. (2008). Changes in connectivity after visual
the two occipital lobes, as assessed Similar findings to these were cortical brain damage underlie altered visual
function. Brain 131, 1433–1444.
by near-zero fractional anisotropy reported by Humphrey [11] for a 8. Strelow, E.R., and Brabyn, J.A. (1982).
values (Figure 1B). In contrast monkey, ‘Helen’, with bilateral striate Locomotion of the blind controlled by natural
sound cues. Perception 11, 635–640.
to cases of unilateral occipital cortical lesions, which at present 9. Larsen, E., Iyer, N., Lansing, C.R., and Feng, A.
hemianopia, where cross-callosal remain the only antecedents of our (2008). On the minimum audible difference in
processing appears to be important results. Helen successfully avoided direct-to-reverberant energy ratio. J. Acoust.
Soc. Am. 124, 450–461.
in linking an input to the damaged various obstacles in an open-field 10. Voss, P., Lassonde, M., Gougoux, F., Fortin, M.,
hemisphere with the homologous test (as illustrated in a video clip Guillemont, J., and Lepore, F. (2004). Early- and
late-onset blind individuals show supra-normal
brain regions in the intact hemisphere downloadable from the web link: auditory abilities in far-space. Curr. Biol. 14,
[7], in TN the possibility of such cross- http://viperlib.york.ac.uk/login_pop. 1734–1738.
hemispheric support appears to be asp?filename=Helen3.mpg&thumb_ 11. Humphrey, N.K. (1974). Vision in a monkey
without striate cortex: a case study. Perception
lost, not surprisingly given that both of id=2582). The lesion was found not 3, 241–255.
his hemispheres have been damaged. to be absolutely complete in one
In view of these negative results, hemisphere, leading to the surmise 1Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
we decided to test his residual that there was a small region of Laboratory, Tilburg University, The
visual abilities for locomotion and intact vision in the far periphery of Netherlands. 2Martinos Center for Biomedical
navigation. We constructed a complex the right visual field. This could not Imaging, MGH-HMS, Charlestown, USA.
3Department of Psychology, University
obstacle course consisting of boxes, have accounted for all the varieties
chairs, and so on, arranged randomly of residual visual functions in Helen, of Torino, Italy. 4Institute for Scientific
Interchange (ISI) Foundation, Torino, Italy.
along a long corridor, without any although there perhaps remains 5Department of Neurocognition, Faculty of
person to guide him and with the some ambiguity in this regard for her Psychology, University of Maastricht, The
removal of his walking cane. An obstacle course performance. Given Netherlands. 6Vision Research Laboratories,
experimenter always followed behind the consonance with the animal School of Psychology, University
him during his traversing the course research background and the extreme of Aberdeen, Scotland. 7Department of
in case of a fall or collision, which rarity of cases with complete cortical Experimental Psychology, University
of Oxford, UK. 8Laboratory of Experimental
seemed a real possibility given his blindness in humans, this striking
Neuropsychology, Neuropsychology Unit and
clinical blindness. Astonishingly, he observation will serve as a take-off Department of Neurology, Geneva University
negotiated it perfectly and never point for future studies, when and if Hospitals, Switzerland.
once collided with any obstacle, as other patients will come to light. E-mail: degelder@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu