Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
R. J. M A R S C H K E and B. J. K I T C H E N l
Otto Madsen Dairy Research Laboratory
Department of Primary Industries
Hamilton, Queensland 4007, Australia
one end to aid quarter identification. Four scores 2, 3, and 4 were prepared by equal
orange spots (diameter 3 cm) of BTB indicator quantities of the same bulk milk mixed with
(.4 ml of .2% wt/vol in ethanol) were im- 1.0 M Tris-HC1 buffer solutions having pH 6.8,
pregnated in square formation on each test 7.1, and 7.4, respectively. Test colors were
paper (Figure 1). scored by comparison with wet color standards.
Dried test colors again were scored against dried
Farms reference colors the following day.
Four commercial farms were sampled at
Determination of pH
intervals of 1 to 2 mo. Three herds of ap-
proximately 50 cows were sampled on five oc- Milk pH was determined on a TPS Digital pH
casions, and a larger herd of approximately 100 meter (Model 1852, "I'.P.S. Pty. Ltd., Old.). The
cows was sampled twice. Animals were pre- meter was calibrated with pH 7.0 and pH 4.0
dominantly Friesians. Mastiffs incidence varied standard buffers, and all measurements were at
on the four farms, as indicated by annual bulk 20 + I°C.
milk cell counts (annual means of monthly bulk
milk counts) ranging from 118 × 103 to 325 × Reference Tests
103/ml. Prevalence of mastiffs in a particular Mastiffs pathogens were identified by
herd was gauged by the proportion of quarters procedures outlined by Griffin et al. (5) and
from that herd with somatic cell count (SCC) classified into major and minor groups (1).
greater than 500 × 103/ml. Somatic cell counts were on a Fossomatic (Foss
Electric, Hillerod, Denmark). Milk conductivity
Sampling was determined at 25°C on a direct reading
Sampling of a11 herds was at evening milking. conductivity meter fitted with a pipette type
The BTB test was on quarter foremilks after conductivity cell (8). The CMT with Rapid
teats were washed thoroughly and dried with Mastitis Test reagent (P.D.S. Rural Products
paper towels. The pointed end of the test strip
was held toward the cow's head, and after the
first stream of foremilk was discarded, a small
amount of milk was squirted onto the cor-
responding indicator spots. Cross flow problems
because of excess milk were reduced by our
j©
bending the test strip upward along the longi- Cow No: Date:
tudinal axis before sampling. Quarter samples
(25 m!) then were collected aseptically by the
O
procedure of Andrews et al. (1). The samples
were packed in ice, stored overnight at 1 to
2°C, and laboratory tested within 24 h.
obtained by raw bulk milk (pH 6.6 to 6.7, fat Figure 1. Test strip impregnated with four spots
content 3.5 to 4.0%) diluted with an equal of bromothymol blue indicator. Longitudinal axis
volume of distilled water, whereas milks for is indicated by dotted line.
Ltd., Sydney, Aust.) was done in the laboratory SCC below about 1 x 106/ml. This was con-
on 2 ml of the test milk mixed with 2 ml of rea- firmed by only 39% of the 281 quarters in the
gent. Results of the CMT test were scored on a SCC range 500 × 103 to 1000 × 103/ml being
scale 1 to 4 corresponding to increasing viscosity positive by the BTB test, this percentage
of the milk/reagent mixture. Score 1 was assessed being reduced to 14% if score 2 results were
as a normal quarter and scores 2, 3, and 4 as excluded.
abnormal quarters. The sensitivity and predictability positive of
the BTB test on all quarter milks are in Table 2.
Evaluation of the Bromothymol Blue Test For the classification criteria b through d,
slightly more than half of the abnormal quarters
Quarter milks were classified as normal or
were identified correctly. For milks containing
abnormal on four occasions according to
a major pathogen, sensitivity was considerably
different reference criteria. For abnormal
less (39%). Poor relationships between presence
milks the criteria were: a) a major pathogen
of pathogens and other mastitis measures such
present, b) SCC /> 500 × 103/mi c) SCC/> 500
as cell count have been reported (17). Pre-
x 103/ml and a major pathogen present,
dictability positive results for criteria b through
and d) conductivity /> 60 mM NaC1 or an
d showed that a positive BTB test had an
elevation of /> 5 mM NaC1 above that of the
approximately equal chance of indicating either
lowest quarter for that cow. Quarter milks
normal or abnormal milk. With the exception
containing minor pathogens were classified
of results based on the presence and absence of
normal. The BTB test was evaluated by its
pathogens, sensitivity and predictability did not
sensitivity, specificity, and predictability posi-
vary greatly between the different criteria even
tive and negative for each of the reference
though these were measuring different responses
criteria (11). Sensitivity was the proportion
to mastitis. In Table 3 specificity and pre-
of abnormal milks correctly identified and
dictability negative are given for each classifi-
specificity the proportion normal milks
cation criteria. About 90% of normal quarters
correctly identified. Predictability positive
were identified correctly by the test, and less
was the proportion of positive BTB results that
than 10% of BTB tests were false negatives.
were true positives, and predictability negative
Negative test results were, therefore, more
was the proportion of negative BTB results that
reliable than positive results, which produced
were true negatives.
about 50% false readings. This is in direct
contrast to results of Fay et al. (4), possibly
RESULTS A N D DISCUSSION because of the higher BTB color threshold and
The mean SCC and mean pH for each BTB different test procedures used by these workers.
score are in Table 1 and represent data obtained Overall, the BTB test misclassified between 11
from all farms. An increase of BTB score was ac- and 20% of all samples tested. A study by
companied by increasing severity of mastitis as Mijnen et al. (15) showed that pH test was of
indicated by both diagnostic measures. However, little diagnostic value and correlated little with
the large variability about the means, particularly
for SCC, showed there was considerable over-
lapping of results and highlighted the possible
error in interpretation of indicator scores. The TABLE 1. Relationship between milk composition
and bromothymol blue (BTB) scores.
wide variation of milk pH within each BTB
score showed that indicator results were not
closely related to pH. This may be explained by BTB
score Quarters SCC1 X 10a/ml pH
variable changes of milk carbon dioxide content
that could affect pH between time of sampling (no.) X SE X SE
and laboratory pH test the following day.
1 2128 252 13 6,63 .003
McDowall (13) found that the pH of quarter 2 343 791 67 6.74 .006
milks increased during standing for 2 to 5 3 91 1893 267 6.83 .018
h and showed that this was partly due to loss of 4 63 3845 600 7.02 .035
carbon dioxide. Table 1 also indicates that the
BTB test would not detect reliably milks with a aSomatic cell count.
TABLE 2. Sensitivity and predictability of a positive bromothymol blue (BTB) test for various criteria of milk
abnorma/ity (4 herds).
Total
Classification Abnormal positive Predictability
criteria quarters by BTB test Sensitivity1 positive ~
(no.) (%)
Major pathogen present 422 649 39 25
SCC 3 /> 500 X lOa/ml 618 649 51 49
SCC/> 500 × lOS/ml and
major pathogen present 248 649 56 52
Conductivity 7> 60 mM
(or quarter difference i> 5 mM) 583 580 55 52
TABLE 3. Specificity and predictability of a negative bromothymol blue (BTB) test for various criteria of milk
normality (4 herds).
Total
Classification Normal negative Predictability
criteria quarters by BTB test Specificity 1 negative 2
- - ( n o . ) - (%)
Major pathogen absent 3347 3123 85 92
SCC 3 < 500 × 103/ml 3151 3123 89 90
SCC < 500 X 103/ml and major
pathogen absent 2977 3123 90 97
Conductivity < 60 mM
(or quarter difference < 5 raM) 3041 2824 90 92
TABLE 4. Effect of prevalence of mastitis in different herds on predictabilities of bromothymol blue (BTB)
test.
BTB Predictability
Bulk No. of quarters
Herd milk SCC1 abnormal 2,3 Positive Negative Positive4 Negative
5
- - (no.) - - (%)
1 118 59 (5) 130 962 25 97
2 284 199(16) 201 1071 51 91
3 299 194(25) 178 612 57 85
4 325 166(27) 140 478 57 82
1Annual mean of monthly bulk milk SCC taken over the sampling period.
2Abnormal quarters are defined by SCC 1> 500 × 103/ml.
Numbers in parentheses represent the percentage of abnormal quarters.
4Proportion of positive BTB results that are true positives.
s Proportion of negative BTB results that are true negatives.
by a 2 to 3 times increase of bulk milk SCC or a regularly for recovery. If the dairy producer
corresponding 3 to 5 times increase of per- wishes to treat subclinical infections, a higher
centage of abnormal quarters. In conjunction, BTB test threshold should be used (score 2
predictability negative decreased but less, and negative) "and positive scores confirmed at two
changes of sensitivity and specificity were only consecutive milkings.
slight. Similar results to these were obtained by A comparative assessment of the rapid BTB
McDermott et al. (12) in examining the re- and CMT tests showed that the CMT was more
lationship between SCC and prevalence of efficient than BTB in terms of sensitivity and
infection in different herds. These workers predictability positive and produced about half
concluded that application of SCC to different the number of misclassifications (Table 5).
herd situations may require appropriate altera- Specificity and predictability negative (not
tions to the test threshold. Our results showed shown in Table 5) were both 92% for CMT and
that increasing the threshold of the BTB test both 86% for BTB. However, a comparison of
(classifying score 2 as negative) markedly the two tests on the basis of SCC may be of
reduced test sensitivity. Therefore, to optimize doubtful significance, because CMT is an
all elements of the test (i.e., sensitivity, specifi- indirect measure of SCC and could be expected
city, and predictability), score 2 should be to give a more favorable result (9, 11).
classified as a positive result, and the test In spite of the apparently better performance
should be used on herds with a relatively high of CMT, the BTB strip test has a number of
prevalence of mastiffs (bulk milk SCC greater practical advantages for cowside use. It is
than 300 × 103/ml). The most effective ap- simpler to perform (no mixing of reagents) and
plication of the test at this threshold would be is more objective, being based on color reactions
for initial screening purposes to obtain a and not viscosity changes. The paper strip
maximum percentage of infected animals. provides a permanent record of the test, and
Decisions to cull cows or to use antibiotic information such as cow identification and date
therapy on cows showing a positive BTB result of testing may be recorded on each strip.
should be based on other confirmatory tests. In Because the test colors and standards remain
herds where cow cell counting schemes are in unchanged for at least 2 wk if kept from direct
operation and m o n t h l y results are available to sunlight, the strips may be kept in the dairy for
the dairy producer, initial screening is not reference in daily monitoring of problem cows.
warranted, and the BTB test can be used to The strips do not need to be read immediately
locate abnormal quarters in cows with elevated after the test but can be assessed later to save
cell counts. Such quarters then can be monitored milking time. In our trial, differences in reading
T A B L E 5. Comparison of efficiency of California Mastitis Test (CMT) and b r o m o t h y m o l blue (BTB) test for
a somatic cell c o u n t threshold of 500 X 103/ml (2 herds), t'2
Predictability
Test Positive quarters Sensitivity 3 positive 4 Misclassifications
(no.) (%)
CMT 234 76 79 11
BTB 228 55 59 21
the test papers wet (within 1 to 2 min of 6 Hume, C. M. 1941. Studies on the detection of
sampling) or dry (the following day) were mastitis in New Zealand dairy herds. I. A field
outfit for the h r o m t h y m o l blue test for mastitis.
infrequent, provided the test spots were com-
N . Z . J . Sci. Technol. 22:322A.
pared to correspondingly wet or dry standards. 7 Joshi, S. V., J. Prasad, and A. Rekib. 1976. Studies
F o r f i e l d a p p l i c a t i o n s , it w o u l d b e m o r e p r a c - on the field diagnosis of subclinical mastitis. Ind.
tical to use a set of dry color standards and Vet. J. 53:752.
make comparisons accordingly. Unused test 8 Kitchen, B. J., G. Middleton, I. G. Durward, R. J.
Andrews, and M. C. Salmon. 1980. Mastitis diag-
strips could be stored indefinitely, being un- nostic tests to estimate m a m m a r y gland epithelial
affected by exposure to light. cell damage. J. Dairy Sci. 63:978.
9 Linzell, J. L., and M. Peaker. 1975. Efficacy of the
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS m e a s u r e m e n t of the electrical conductivity of milk
for the detection of subclinical mastitis in cows:
The authors are grateful for the assistance of Detection of infected cows at a single visit. Br. Vet.
C. A n n a n d , B. H o l d i n g , N. H o l z a p f e l , R . J. 131:447.
R o b e r t s , a n d W. W a r d in t h e c o l l e c t i o n a n d 10 Liick, H., and A. Smith. 1975. Relationship
between constituent concentrations and the pH
testing of milk samples. This work was supported
value of m a m m a r y gland secretions. S. Aft. J. Dairy
in p a r t b y a g r a n t f r o m t h e A u s t r a l i a n D a i r y Technol. 7:27.
Research Committee. 11 Martin, S. W. 1977. The evaluation of tests. Can. J.
Comp. Med. 41:19.
REFERENCES 12 McDermott, M. P., H. N. Erb, and R. P. Natzke.
1 Andrews, R. J., B. J. Kitchen, W. S. Kwee, and F. 1982. Predictability by somatic cell counts related
Duncalfe. 1983. Relationship between individual to prevalence of i n t r a m a m m a r y infection within
cow somatic cell counts and the mastitis infection herds. J. Dairy Sci. 65:1535.
status of the udder. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 38:71. 13 McDowall, F. H. 1941. Studies on the detection of
2 Baker, J. C., and L. L. Van Slyke. 1919. A m e t h o d mastitis in New Zealand dairy herds. II. Factors
for the preliminary detection of abnormal milk influencing the b r o m t h y m o l blue test for mastitis.
based on the hydrogen ion concentration. J. Biol. N . Z . J . Sci. Technol. 22:328A.
Chem. 40:357. 14 McDowall, F. H. 1945. Studies on the detection of
3 Blood, D. C., and J. A. Henderson. 1968. Veterinary mastitis in New Zealand dairy herds. V. Com-
medicine. 3rd ed. Bailliere Tindall and Cassell, position of milk from quarters reacting to the
London. b r o m t h y m o l blue test for mastitis. N . Z . J . Sci.
4 Fay, A. C., H. W. Cave, and F. W. Atkeson. 1938. Technol. 27:258.
Detection of mastitis by the b r o m t h y r n o l blue test, 15 Mijnen, E., F.H.J. Jaartsveld, G.A.A. Albers,
leucocyte count, and the microscopic examination M.W.A. Verstegen, and M.J.M. Tielen. 1982. The
of incubated samples of milk. Cornell Vet. 28:40. value of cell count, lactose content, pH and con-
5 Griffin, T. K., F. H. Dodd, F. K. Neave, D. R. ductivity of milk for mastitis detection in individual
Westgarth, R. G. Kingwill, and C. D. Wilson. 1977. cows. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 36:65.
A m e t h o d for diagnosing i n t r a m a m m a r y infection 16 Pendse, M. D., and P. G. Nair. 1970. The develop-
in dairy cows for large experiments. J. Dairy Res. m e n t and evaluation of a test for sub-clinical
44:25. mastitis. Ind. J. Dairy Sci. 23:7.
17 Postle, D. S. 1967. Comparisons of mastitis screen- Experiments and observations leading to the
ing test results from quarter, bucket and bulk milk development o f the California Mastitis Test. J. A m .
samples. J. Milk Food Technol. 30:7. Vet. Med. Assoc. 130:199.
18 Schalm, O. W., E. J. Carroll, and N. C. Jain. 1971. 20 SchiSnherr, W. 1958. Examination of the udder in
Bovine mastitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA. cows with the aid of an indicator paper. Monatsh.
19 Schalm, O. W., and D. O. Noorlander. 1957. Veterinaermed. 13 : 304.