Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ms. Aboelezz
Part I:
The following advertisement misleads the audience through a deceptive claim about the
product. The company presents all the physical enhancements the consumer may obtain by using
the product, but it avoids disclosing the health hazards and other side effects resulting from the
consumption. For example, the attractive physiques depicted in the advertisement exemplify the
positive effects of the product. In addition, the company appeals to the masses by claiming their
product to be “America’s #1 Selling Thermogenic.” Through this claim, the company attracts
more consumers by guaranteeing the efficiency of the product through its popularity. It also
Kim 2
entices the consumer by offering a free bottle of Hydroxycut as a bait, making the purchase of
the product even more desirable. By veiling the harms and emphasizing the benefits of the
product, the company deceives the consumer into buying its product.
The above advertisement successfully delivers its message and purpose in a clear and
effective manner. The message is quite explicit on the first look based on the statement of “Find
Your Greatness.” The background image of a fat man jogging has more implicit meaning. The
image empowers courage and motivates the audience to fight against obstacles. Not only is the
message inspiring and memorable, it also sets up an implication that the Nike products would
support everyone to reach their personal objectives. Since the values emphasized in the
advertisement are widely relevant to everyone, Nike effectively appeals to credibility with a
large audience. The powerful message embodied in the advertisement meaningfully reaches out
The difference between deceptive and civil advertisements is the way in which the
message is delivered. In a deceptive advertisement, the truth about the product is not entirely
unveiled, instead, it misleads the audience about the quality or the effects of its product. Often,
Kim 3
the descriptions of the product are very one-sided and avoid disclosing the defects of the product.
This is particularly true in the Hydroxycut ad, which leaves out the safety cautions of consuming
the diet pills, and only presents the physical benefits of the product for the sole purpose of luring
improving the lives of its consumers but simply make more money off its products. On the other
hand, a civil advertisement impacts the audience through meaningful messages and demonstrates
how the product would fit into consumers’ lives. The values represented by the advertisement are
clear, definite, and inextricably connected to the consumers. For instance, the image of the fat
man jogging in the Nike ad delivers courage and confidence to the audience. The positive
message of the Nike ad is more authentic and resonates with the audience.
The following excerpt is adapted from Joe Dodson, “Godzilla Unleashed: Double Smash
Do you ever wonder what it must be like to be the guy who plays Godzilla in all those
movies? By day, he's Godzilla; by night, he's Todd. He gets paid to act like a monster, but
he's only too aware of his actual limitations, just as he knows that King Ghidorah isn't
really a giant, alien space dragon; King Ghidorah is really Bill, and his wife is leaving
him. Now you too can share in Todd's feelings of disillusionment and despair with Atari's
new Godzilla Unleashed: Double Smash, a game that ostensibly lets you burn cities,
crush armies, and defeat monsters as Godzilla, but actually serves to remind you that
you're just a normal guy or gal playing a bad video game. (Dodson)
Kim 4
Dodson’s subject is the poor performance of the game. The review continues on about his
dull experience with the game in every aspect from repetitive storyline and gameplay to painful,
unfitting soundtrack. The primary audience is the Nintendo or Godzilla fans who might have
thought about purchasing the game. Moreover, the relationship between the speaker and the
audience is digital, as the review is only accessible through online. The review utterly
disappoints the fans with its harsh criticism of the game. This connects to the whole purpose of
the review, which is to warn the audience before purchasing the game. Dodson, for example,
compares the gameplay to a “free Internet flash game,” which gives an idea to the audience that
Activity 3 (pg.6):
Subject: Explicitly, the subject is about the recent terrorist acts that have devastated countless
lives and buildings, and the nation’s declaration to move forward and establish justice. The
implicit subject is the undefeatable American nationalism that joins the nation together in times
of crisis.
Occasion: The occasion is the 9/11 terrorist attack. More specifically, the speech was delivered
right after the terrorism to mourn the loss and declare war against terrorism
Audience: The target audience is not just the victims who have suffered from the terrorist acts,
but also the terrorists who have committed the crimes. As the President of the United States,
George Bush also addresses every American citizen on behalf of the government and the nation.
More broadly, he is speaking to the entire globe that America has not yielded to terrorism and
Purpose: The primary purpose of the speech is to show that America remains intact and strong
despite the terrorist attacks. He guarantees the nation’s economy would reinstate and continue to
flourish. Bush establishes feelings of security and safety throughout the speech in order to
reassure his citizens and continue moving forward against terrorism. Moreover, Bush is willing
to avenge the death of his citizens and the destructions by bringing justice to those behind the
attacks. Rather than simply sympathizing the victims of the terrorism, Bush aims to stabilize the
Speaker: The speaker is George W. Bush, the President of the United States. He speaks with
dignity and formality throughout the speech while responding to the recent terrorism. In his
speech, however, Bush is not just the leader of one nation, but he also presents himself as an
American citizen who feels grief and anger for the destructions that have shattered the entire
nation.
When you are presenting your ways to prevent bullying to a certain group of people, your
approach to attain credibility with the School Board and parents should be different than when
When speaking to the School Board and parents, it would be most effective to have an
expertise in the study of bullying. For instance, you may be a psychologist who has studied and
researched on bullying or teenage behaviors. In this case, your expertise would guarantee that
your statistics and facts are from a trustworthy source. Especially when you are dealing with
adults, it is important to prove your profession in the field so that the audience would trust in
your arguments. Another way would be to present yourself as a parent who has his children
Kim 6
previously bullied or victimized in school. In this way, you would establish ethos by speaking as
a first person who knows what it feels like to see their children bullied. This would not only help
gain sympathy from the audience but also trust in your speech.
When talking to a group of students, you have to be aware of the fact that they are the
ones who can possibly be the victims or the aggressors. Although being an expert or professional
may also work, having an adult or grownup speaking to the students may make them feel
uncomfortable or even intimidating. However, if you are a student who has experienced bullying
in the past, you could form a sense of bond and commonality with the students, which may be
more effective in presenting your views and solutions on bullying. The students you talk to may
never have seen or experienced bullying, thus by telling your first person experience with
bullying, your message would reach out to the students more effectively and meaningfully.
To give a logical argument against the inexorable intake of coal in China, George Will
starts off the passage with a staggering statistic regarding the massive amount of coal burned in
China every year. This gains an immediate attention from the audience. Throughout the passage,
Will offers clear reasons for his main argument, all backed up by sufficient amount of evidence.
For instance, he blames America and Austria for supplying these coals to China, calling their
supplies a “crime against nature.” He then supports his claim about these supplies from America
by pointing out that “150 million tons” have been exported from the “Powder River Basin of
Wyoming and Montana.” Furthermore, he refutes the counterargument about the profits China
has gained through the intake of coal. The counterargument claims that the massive import of
coal has led to the enhanced national transportation system, increased capacity of the electrical
Kim 7
system, and new cities to withstand the exponentially rising population. However, the
aforementioned statistics on the tremendous burning of coal, which has been damaging the
environment, undermine the benefits stated in the counterargument. Will has carefully chosen his
evidence from credible sources, including the Times and the Atlantic. By strengthening his
argument and undermining the counterargument through evidence, Will successfully delivers the
At the outset, Eisenhower spurs a feeling of patriotism and union by telling that the entire
world supports the Allied Expeditionary Force. As the commander of the troop, Eisenhower does
not level himself with his soldiers in the beginning of the speech, yet he is still able to establish
proximity with his soldiers by speaking about their common fears and hopes. He mostly uses
“you” and “I” to maintain his superiority and leadership over the soldiers. Without being too
despondent, Eisenhower warns his troops that the “enemy is well trained, well equipped, and
battle hardened.” Afterwards, he revitalizes their spirits by stating that the German soldiers have
suffered from “great defeats, in open battle, man-to-man” and “reduced [of] their strength in the
air and their capacity to wage war on the ground.” Approaching the end of the speech, he shifts
to using first person possessive pronouns to establish a sense of common purpose and aspiration.
He tells them, “our air offense has reduced [the German] strength” and “our Home Fronts have
given us an overwhelming superiority.” He delivers that the tides have turned to their side and
the soldiers have nothing to be afraid of. Not only this further strengthens the union among
soldiers, it augments their trust in their nations. In the end, Eisenhower embeds confidence and
Kim 8
relief in his soldiers by concluding with remarks about the “blessing of Almighty God” upon
them. The religious reference inspirits the soldiers and gives them a feeling of embracement.
Choice: You need to propose healthier diets in the school cafeteria to your principal and school
Ethos: As a student, it would be difficult to demonstrate that you are credible based on your
reputation as you do not have any expertise or profession in the field. However, you can still
emphasize your common purpose with the students and staffs at the school, that you honestly
believe bringing in healthier food choices into the cafeteria would be the benefits of all. By
sharing your sincerity with the audience, it would give them a reason to listen to you on the
subject. Otherwise, the audience would not be open to your demands in changing the food
Logos: Logos is the most crucial factor in determining whether your demands are worth the risk.
You can present statistics, facts, or examples about how nutritious diets can help students grow
up healthy both physically and mentally. You can even mention about the consequences of cheap
artificial foods leading to increased rates of childhood obesity, which can become a long-term
problem for students from poor and minor families. When considering all the costs that
unhealthy food choices in the cafeteria can result in, you can argue the changes are worth the
chance. Evidence from trustworthy sources would be necessary to make your arguments
persuasive. A way to strengthen your point, even more, would be to acknowledge and refute a
counterargument that low-priced food choices would save school budget. This can be through
presenting methods to produce new funds such as an advertisement for donation, ticket sales for
Kim 9
school events, or toy resales. By weakening the counterargument, you can make your argument
Pathos: You can appeal to pathos by explaining how the consequences of unhealthy foods
choices can forever impact students’ lives. Perhaps the most striking appeal to emotions would
be connecting these consequences with the children of the audience. Just as they would not let
their children eat unhealthy food at school, so too the parents of all students at the school. It is
important to remind the audience that healthier food choices may cost the school more money,
but if they truly care about the well-being of their students, they would make the correct decision
The speaker of the advertisement is the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), which is an active
would like to join the cause or donors who are willing to contribute money to support the
organization.
The reputation of WWF and their sincerity in protecting the nature and people establish
ethos. The written text reveals the motive of the conservation organization, which is to aid the
“ten million people in sub-Saharan Africa [who] make a living fishing” and “protect marine
population from overfishing.” The selfless and noble motive encourages the audience to support
the movement. The organization is also “at work in more than 40 countries” in order to develop
efficient and safe fishing practices, as well as safeguarding the marine lives. Their worldwide
influence further appeals to credibility by showing the audience that the organization is already
The image in the advertisement evokes emotions. The red, blue-dotted fish in the center
grabs immediate attention. The depressing eye of the fish delivers the urgency of the
environmental crisis. The photo of two topless African fishermen reinforces the organization’s
claim about helping millions of African fishermen retain their job and support their families. The
photo gains sympathy from the audience seeing how the fishermen may lose their only job and
unable to support their families. The WWF is prioritizing both mankind and nature in their cause.
At the bottom of the advertisement, the organization asks the audience to “be a part of our
work,” after they have seen the noble purpose of the movement and feel the need to support it.
The logo of the WWF on the top reminds the audience again of the credibility of the organization
and brings in trust. By deliberately placing different elements throughout the advertisement, the
organization successfully persuades the audience to care about the “future of nature” and help the
movement.
In the beginning of the text, the WWF states, “In the past three decades, the number of
fish in [African] waters has declined by 50%.” The mention of the decline of fish is an appeal to
logos because fish plays a significant role in both African economy and wildlife. As
aforementioned, “ten million people in sub-Saharan Africa make a living fishing.” Thus the loss
of marine lives would aggravate the already desperate economic situation in the region. In
addition, the decline would impact the food chain in African wildlife that can lead to long-term
environmental problems.
Overall, the advertisement effectively reaches out to the intended audience. It first
informs the problem regarding the depopulation of African marine lives, aided by visual
elements that grab the audience by their heartstrings. The image of the red fish and African
fishermen gains solicitude from the audience, thus encouraging them to support the movement.
Kim 11
The advertisement does not simply convince the audience using emotions, instead, they give out
a reason. The millions of African families depend their livings on the marine life, and losing
Tamar Demby criticizes Applebaum’s argument for failing to present any concrete
evidence and instead manipulating the audience’s emotions by presenting only the devastations
of the catastrophe. Demby’s stance toward Applebaum’s argument is quite apparent in her
statement, “it becomes tempting to regard any danger as an apocalypse waiting to happen.” She
argues that Applebaum embroiders the current problems and makes them appear more
dangerous. For instance, Applebaum explicitly mentions that the “chances of a major disaster are
tiny, one in a million,” but she presents these improbable scenarios appear alarming by
emphasizing the destructions that can take place. Demby then adds to her argument about how
Applebaum also fails to appeal to ethos as she has no expertise in nuclear catastrophe issues.
Demby suggests Applebaum should have based her arguments mostly on appeal to logos, which
would have allowed her argument to be backed by strong evidence from credible sources, but
instead the author chose to appeal to emotions. For instance, Applebaum warns the risk of
nuclear catastrophe by demonstrating that even Japan with “technological brilliance” could not
survive the nuclear meltdown. However, as Demby points out, Applebaum fails to provide any
evidence that supports Japan’s technological brilliance, which nullifies the argument made in the
article.
I overall agree with Demby’s criticism. She tackles the flaws that weaken the argument
in the article. Because Applebaum lacks profession in the field, the only way for the audience to
Kim 12
believe in her claims is to use strong evidence. Applebaum is speaking as a columnist, not a
nuclear physicist, hence without a viewpoint from a professional, her argument would be fragile.
Just as Demby argues, Applebaum seems to only unveil one side of the situation, the one that
appears more tragic. Demby recognizes this problem and uses evidence from the article to
However, one way for her to improve her essay would be to present a counterargument.
the evidence-lacking article and demonstrate her understanding of other possible views. For
instance, it is true that Applebaum often uses emotions to reinforce her points, but her article is
still arguable to some degree. Applebaum does make her point about being alarmed about even a
slight chance of catastrophe, which can possibly devastate an entire city or nation. If Japan was
not able to fully recover from the nuclear meltdown, the result would be far more catastrophic in
underdeveloped nations. This argument about the devastating effects of nuclear catastrophe
misses evidence, but it still has a strong point. If Demby acknowledges and counters
To examine the rhetorical situation, the speaker of the advertisement is the Federal
Highway Administration. The occasion is unspecified, but the context of the advertisement is an
accident that could have hurt a mother and her child. The audience is both drivers and
pedestrians. The purpose of the advertisement is to warn how the impatience and carelessness of
drivers can result in undoable consequences. The overall subject is the danger of car accident.
Kim 13
The history and background of FHWA appeal to ethos in the advertisement. Since the
organization is a branch of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is created for the sole
purpose of managing transportation system, the audience would trust in the advertisement. The
organization is not targeting money, but simply raising awareness on car accidents. For the
ethical and nonprofit intention of the advertisement, the FHWA is able to establish credibility
The image of the baby stroller pulls the heartstrings of the audience. The quotation above
the image gives some context to what has happened; a driver has hit a mother and her child. By
making the victims of the car accident a mother and child, who are often characterized as the
“weak” and “vulnerable” in the society, the organization gains sympathy from the audience. The
quotation is also spoken in a style of testimony. And instead of a direct apology to the victims,
the driver blames the accident on the circumstance by stating, “I was looking out for other cars. I
didn’t see the mother and child in the crosswalk.” The accusing tone of the driver provokes anger
from the audience and more sympathy for the victims of the accident.
The caption at the bottom reads, “In the time it takes to look for someone in the
crosswalk and stop for them, you could save a life… or change yours forever.” The commentary
appeals to logos as a simple effort of observation and cautiousness can save lives. It is reasonable
for the audience to avoid an everlasting guilt by killing the victims because of a single
inattention.
All in all, the advertisement is quite effective in sending its message about waiting for the
pedestrians to cross the highway. The visual element immediately grabs the audience’s attention,
and the quotation adds to the emotions in the advertisement. The advertisement allows the
Kim 14
audience to learn about the tragic consequences of a car accident. The combination of different
Works Cited
Dodson, Joe. “Godzilla Unleashed: Double Smash Review.” GameSpot, GameSpot, 20 Nov.
2007, www.gamespot.com/reviews/godzilla-unleashed-double-smash-review/1900-
6184054/.
Find Your Greatness Nike Ad. Digital image. Mail Online. Mail Online, 7 Aug. 2012. Web. 2
advert-Story-200lb-jogging-boy-Nathan-Sorrell-new-Nike-ad-charmed-America.html>.
Hydroxycut – Show off Your Defined Muscles with This Amazing Product. Digital image.
<https://nataliarocon.com/hydroxycut-show-off-your-defined-muscles-with-this-
amazing-product/>.