Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COURSE
KA43403 ADVANCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
TITLE
SOLAR PANEL MINI PROJECT
DATE OF SUBMISSION
23th MAY 2017
PREPARED TO
DR HARIMI DJAMILA
PREPARED BY
Page
List of Contents i
List of Figures iv
Chapter 1:
To describe the location under investigation, sketch of the
selected residential building and estimate the monthly and yearly
energy consumption in the house
Chapter 2:
To compare the actual electrical usage and cost with the detailed
estimated electrical usage and cost of the selected house.
Chapter 3:
To compare the actual energy consumption when using normal
electrical appliances with energy consumption from energy
saving electrical appliances
i
Chapter 4:
To estimate the generated carbon dioxide produced from the
electrical usage
Chapter 5:
To propose a complete design for the solar panel as well as its’
installing location
Chapter 6: 20
Conclusion and Recommendations
References 21
ii
LIST OF TABLES
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
iv
1. To describe the location under investigation, sketch of the selected residential
building and estimate the monthly and yearly energy consumption in the house.
The location of the study subject is a terrace house which located at Putatan, Kota
Kinabalu. There are 5 person staying in the house, where two of them are office
workers, two of them are retired residents and a student. Figure 1.1 shows the plan
view of the house while Figure 1.2 illustrated the roof detailing of the house.
The roof of the house was designed as pitch roof with 6 from the horizontal
base. This is to allow the rain water to flow through the roof easily with minimum wind
effects on the structure.
1
Figure 1.2 Roof Plan View
2
1.2 Energy Consumption of the Household Appliances
Table 1.1 tabulated the energy consumption of the common household appliances that
used in the studied object in single day. Meanwhile Table 1.2 showed the energy
consumption per day if the studied object was using the energy saving household
appliances.
3
Table 1.2 Energy Consumption using Energy Saving Appliances
Usage Time Daily Energy
Appliances Brand Watt (W)
(hr) Consumption (kWh)
Air-conditioner Panasonic 1470 4 5.88
Ceiling fan Panasonic 25 x 3 12 0.90
units
TV Samsung 28 4 0.11
Speaker Samsung 5x2 4 0.04
units
Iron HANFONG 150 0.25 0.04
Washing machine Panasonic 115 1 0.12
Fridge Panasonic 48 24 1.15
Kettle Prestige 900 0.25 0.23
Water heater Panasonic 3600 1 3.60
Rice cooker Panasonic 660 1 0.66
Hair dryer Panasonic 850 0.5 0.43
Ceiling light Philips LED 7x8 8 0.45
light bulb units
Laptop ASUS 50 4 0.20
Total energy consumption per day 13.79
4
The following steps shows the calculation for the monthly and yearly energy
consumption in the house based on the standard tariff provided by SESB. The
difference of using the common appliances and energy saving appliances are shown
clearly in the following calculation.
Table 1.3 Tariff of Electric Bill Based On Current Tariff Provided by SESB
Tariff Category Rates (RM/kWh)
For the first 100 kWh (1-100 kWh) per month 0.175
For the next 100 kWh (101-200 kWh) per month 0.185
For the next 100 kWh (201-300 kWh) per month 0.330
For the next 200 kWh (301-500 kWh) per month 0.445
For the next kWh (501 kWh onwards) per month 0.450
For the first 100 kWh (1-100 kWh) per month = 100 x RM 0.175
= RM 17.50
For the next 100 kWh (101-200 kWh) per month = 100 x RM 0.185
= RM 18.50
For the next 100 kWh (201-300 kWh) per month = 100 x RM 0.330
= RM 33.00
For the next 200 kWh (301-500 kWh) per month = 200 x RM 0.445
= RM 89.00
For the next kWh (501 kWh onwards) per month = 410 x RM 0.450
= RM 184.50
5
Calculation for monthly tariff consumption for energy saving appliances
Monthly energy consumption = 13.79 kWh x 30 days
= 413.7 kWh
For the first 100 kWh (1-100 kWh) per month = 100 x RM 0.175
= RM 17.50
For the next 100 kWh (101-200 kWh) per month = 100 x RM 0.185
= RM 18.50
For the next 100 kWh (201-300 kWh) per month = 100 x RM 0.330
= RM 33.00
For the next 144 kWh (301-414 kWh) per month = 144 x RM 0.445
= RM 64.08
6
2. To compare the actual electrical usage and cost with the detailed estimated
electrical usage and cost of the selected house.
Based on the energy consumption calculated, using energy saving electrical appliances
was estimated to decrease the energy usage approximately 55 %, which is 16.54 kWh
per day and decrease the bills nearly 62 %, which is RM 209.42 per month.
The difference of energy consumed is clearly shown in Table 2.1 where the
highest energy user included air-conditioner, ceiling fan, fridge and rice cooker. This
huge difference shown in the bill is mainly due to the high power appliances such as
air-conditioner or rice cooker and the frequent used appliances such as fridge or ceiling
fan. In this matter, the appliances that contributed the highest cost in the bills are air-
conditioner and rice cooker due to the high power usage. Huge difference of energy
7
consumption was shown when energy saving appliance was adopted even the time
usage was short.
Meanwhile, the appliances such as ceiling fan and fridge also contributed a lot
in saving the electric bill. This is mainly due to the frequent usage of those appliances.
In this regards, a small amount of energy saved when using the energy saving
appliance will results in huge amount in the end of the month due to the large quantity
of time multiplier.
The actual electrical bill cost was RM 326.79 on March of 2017, while the
estimated cost is RM 342.50. Therefore, the difference is about 4.6 %.
8
3. To compare the actual energy consumption when using normal electrical
appliances with energy consumption from energy saving electrical appliances.
3.1 Comparison between the Normal and Energy Saving Electrical Appliances
The comparison of the energy consumption when using normal electrical appliances
with energy consumption from energy saving appliances was shown in Table 2.2. The
comparison was done base on daily basis.
9
4. To estimate the generated carbon dioxide produced from the electrical usage.
The generated carbon dioxide produced from the electrical usage was done based on
the principal of the carbon footprint calculator. The results was shown in Table 1.4.
Based on Table 1.4, the estimated electricity used per month is 909.9 kWh with a total
of 5 household produces a carbon footprint of 0.639 metric tons. In addition, as for
yearly basis, the household produced a total of 7.7 metric tons of carbon footprint.
10
5. To propose a complete design for the solar panel as well as its installing location.
In addition, when the grid tie systems have extra generated electricity, it would
be channelled into the utility grid to be reused (Rex, 2009). Besides that, grid-tie
systems allows saving of more money with net metering. This happens through better
efficiency rates, net metering, plus lower equipment and installation costs. The solar
panels often also generate more electricity than of consuming. Hence, grid-tied solar
systems generally cheaper and simpler to install as well as the better choice.
11
5.1.2 Type of Design
Basically, crystalline solar panels can be divided into two which is mono-
crystalline and poly-crystalline solar panels. The efficiencies for monocrystalline silicon
are found to be significantly higher than polycrystalline silicon. A study showed that
the power losses varied depending on the type of the solar cell. The average loss of
power due to temperature rise is 8% for monocrystalline silicon, and 9% for the
polycrystalline silicon (Chaichan, M. T., 2016).
Therefore, the type of solar panel chosen is a solar panel with a specifications
of 185 W which are made of monocrystalline silicon cells from Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu.
It was chosen because it has the highest efficiency of 17.3% compared to the other
type of solar panel. Moreover, it has a lower optimum operating current of 5.090 A
which makes it safer to operate. Besides that, it also have the most number of solar
cells of 72 cells that can increase the efficiency of the solar panel and the output power
of the solar panel. The weight of the solar panels also is as an important factor on the
selection of solar panel because lighter weight poses a smaller load on the roof. The
cost of the solar panel is RM1492.99 or $345.00 which is expensive but in the long run
it will profit the user as it can reduce the energy consumption from utility grid and
hence having a cheaper electricity bills.
12
Table 5.1 ET- M572185 Model of Solar Panel
Peak Power 185 W
Type of Cells Monocrystalline Silicon
Number of Cells 72 cells
Dimensions 1580 x 808 x 50 mm
Cell Efficiency 17.3 %
Optimum Operating Voltage 36.3 V
Optimum Operating Current 5.090 A
Voltage temperature coefficient - 0.397 %/K
Current temperature coefficient + 0.06 %/K
Power temperature coefficient - 0.549 %/K
Weight 15.5 kg
Temperature range 44 oC ± 2 oC
Source: http://www.solarpower-mart.com/solar_panel
13
• Equipped weatherproof junction box, flawless operation in wet weather
and marine applications
• Resilient to harsh weather conditions
• Optimal panel performance
The optimum tilt angle for solar panel as according to Qiu and Riffat (2003) has
suggested the tilt angle of the solar collector set within the optimum tilt angle of 90° minus
latitude. It was found that this tilt angle of solar collector is acceptable in practice since it
results in the relative error of solar energy gain below 1.5%.
84.03° is the best angle to compromise, generating the electricity through solar energy at
year round.
Table 5.2 shows the solar irradiance value for Kota Kinabalu when the solar panel
facing East South East (67.5o from South). In addition, the most efficient way to obtain
the highest solar irradiance value is by putting the solar panel on the flat surface.
14
Since the optimum tilt angle of Kota Kinabalu is approximately 84°, some
adjustment might be needed in order to obtain the maximum solar irradiance. However,
the roof pitch angle of the house is 6°, which results in 84° of tilt angle. This tilt angle
is the same as the optimum tilt angle for Kota Kinabalu area, therefore no adjustment
of angle is needed.
According to Table 5.2, the maximum value of solar irradiance for Kota Kinabalu
area at optimum tilt angle of 84° is on March with 5.50 kWh/m2/day, while the
minimum value is on the August with 4.41 kWh/m2/day.
3.10 2.76 2.02 1.79 2.25 2.34 2.19 1.83 1.57 2.2 2.69 2.95
2) Flat Surface
5.06 5.71 6.35 6.36 5.68 5.24 5.10 5.09 5.24 4.97 4.70 4.60
2) Optimal
Year Round
(84o)
4.88 5.28 5.50 5.42 5.05 4.73 4.56 4.41 4.43 4.45 4.44 4.46
84
3) Adjusted
throughout
the Year
0.00 5.28 5.50 5.58 5.04 4.73 4.54 4.49 4.43 4.47 0.00 4.52
15
4) Best Winter
Performance
4.88 5.28 5.50 5.42 5.05 4.73 4.56 4.41 4.43 4.45 4.44 4.46
5) Best
Summer
Performance
4.60 5.13 5.60 5.58 5.04 4.67 4.53 4.48 4.58 4.42 4.24 4.19
Solar Panel
Based on Figure 5.2, it can be seen that the house roof is facing two directions,
which are, West-North and South-East with an inclination roof angle of 15o from the
horizontal line. The installation of the solar panel will be on the South-East direction.
16
Since the roof angle is slightly less than the optimum tilt for the solar panel,
which is 0.59o, thus the installation of the solar panel needed not any angle adjustment.
The following formula was adopted to determine the amount of energy generated by
a solar panel:
The following calculation was conducted based on the solar panel power of 185
watt and the solar panel angle of 84°, which mounted on the rooftop. According to
Table 5.2, the highest irradiance value is on March with value of 5.50 kWh/m2/day,
while the lowest irradiance value is on August with 4.41 kWh/m2/day. The following
calculation showed the estimated energy generated by the solar panel for both months.
Table 5.3 Power Generated per day by Solar Panel in March and August
Optimal Year Round (84o) March August
84
Several aspects was considered to determine the actual capacity of the solar panel.
For instance, the peculiarities of the site, the location of the site, the angle of solar
panel, and the obstacles that potentially blocking the sunlight from reaching the solar
panel.
In order to estimate the system required to work in the worst and best month,
the total number of watt-hour per day was divided by the solar irradiance.
17
Table 5.4 Estimated System Required to Work on March and August
Optimal Year Round (84o) On March, the At optimum tilt, the solar
required energy: panel tends to generate
30.33/5.50 = 5.51 kW 5.51 kW for March.
On August, the At optimum tilt, the solar
required energy: panel tends to generate
Table 5.1 tabulated the average air temperature for each month of year 2016 in Kota
Kinabalu. In addition, the estimated solar panel temperature and the impact on the
performance on the solar array was shown in Table 5.1. The impact performance for
the solar panel was based on the power temperature coefficient while the estimated
solar panel temperature was obtained by multiplying 1.4 to the average temperature
in each month.
As shown in Table 5.1, the temperature range for the solar panel to work
efficiently is 44 oC while the power temperature coefficient is - 0.549 %/K. There are
only minor impact on the performance of solar panel since the estimated solar panel
temperature is lower than 44 oC at the month of January, February, March and
December. Meanwhile, the greatest impact on the solar performance is on the month
of May, which is –12.4 %.
According to the performance impact shown in Table 5.2, the efficiency of solar
panel might drop 21 watt per day on May in the worst scenario.
18
Table 5.5 Solar Temperature Impact on Solar Performance in Kota
Kinabalu in 2016
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Average monthly
32 32 32 33 34 33 33 33 33 33 33 32
temperature (C)
Estimated solar
panel temperature
44.8 44.8 44.8 46.2 47.6 46.2 46.2 46.2 46.2 46.2 46.2 44.8
for roof-mounted
(C)
Performance
-10.8 -10.8 -10.8 -11.6 -12.4 -11.6 -11.6 -11.6 -11.6 -11.6 -11.6 -10.8
impact (%)
19
6.0 Conclusion and Recommendations
In conclusion, the implementation of solar panel was proven that able to reduce the
carbon footprint emission. As an extra credit to solar panel, it also tends to save the
cost of owner in long term from the electric bills. Therefore, besides of using electric
saving appliances, implementation of solar panel would be another alternative to save
the mother Earth.
As to prove the above statement, solar panel tends to reduce the carbon
footprint emission up to 7.7 metric tonnes for a residential unit house that lives with 5
residents. This can be achieve by simply installing a solar panel with 6.4 m x 4.0 m
dimension. In conclusion, the geographical advantage in Kota Kinabalu that tends to
receive the solar radiance constantly and consistently is suitable to implement the solar
panel to each residential housing area.
20
References
Best Electric Kettle in India: Kitchen Appliance Review. Retrieved from Internet. Date
9 May 2017. http://food.ndtv.com/reviews/best-electric-kettle-in-india-kitchen-
appliance-review-1241743
Energy efficient of different air conditioner brand. Retrieved from Internet. Date 9
May 2017. http://www.energyefficiencydatabase.com/best-air-conditioner-
brand.html
G. Qiu and S. B. Riffat, “Optimum tilt angle of solar collectors and its impact on
performance,” International Journal of Ambient Energy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–
20, 2003.
Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. Retrieved from Internet. Date 9 May 2017.
https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator
Latitude and Longitude for Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. Retrieved from Internet. Date 20
May 2017. http://latitudelongitude.org/my/kota-kinabalu/
21
Power consumption of Panasonic SR-WA18 E 4.4-Litre 660-Watt Automatic Rice Cooker.
Retrieved from Internet. Date 9 May 2017. http://www.amazon.in/Panasonic-
SR-WA18-4-4-Litre-660-Watt-Automatic/dp/B0073QKW2K
Power consumption of Panasonic water heater. Retrieved from Internet. Date 9 May
2017. http://www.panasonic.com/my/consumer/home-appliances/home-
shower/jet-pump/dh-3mp1.html
Power consumption of Samsung TV. Retrieved from Internet. Date 9 May 2017.
http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN32EH4003FXZA-specs
Power consumption of solar energy saving DC electric dry iron. Retrieved from Internet.
Date 9 May 2017. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Solar-energy-saving-
DC-electric-dry_60537490908.html
Power consumption of NOVA NV-258 Foldable Mini Travel Hair Dryer Compact Blower.
Retrieved from Internet. Date 9 May 2017. http://www.lazada.com.ph/nova-nv-
258-foldable-mini-travel-hair-dryer-compact-blower-
12598040.html?spm=a2o4l.category-080702010000.0.0.VDtCvB&ff=1
Solar Irradiance Value for Kota Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. Retrieved from Internet. Date
20 May 2017. http://solarelectricityhandbook.com/solar-irradiance.html
22