Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Posted: 03/11/2010
How effective is the 2% CHG solution for preop bathing? Are 2 baths with 4 % CHG
sufficient for skin antisepsis?
An estimated 500,000 surgical site infections (SSIs) occur each year. Patients with a
SSI have a 2-11 times greater risk for death than surgical patients without a SSI, and
spend approximately 7-10 more days in the hospital at additional costs of $3000 to
$29,000.[1] The use of an antimicrobial skin agent such as chlorhexidine gluconate
(CHG) with a bath or shower works in 2 ways to prevent SSI. The simple act of
mechanical friction and rinsing removes transient skin microbes. The addition of an
agent such as CHG provides persistent activity, which further reduces the level of the
patient’s own skin flora. For patients scheduled for a surgical procedure, the
recommendation from the Association of periOperative Nurses is to use 4% CHG for
bathing or showering the night before and the morning of the scheduled procedure.
[2]
The details of that recommendation have been previously reviewed in an article
about preoperative showers and baths. [3] It is probably safe to say that using
aqueous 4 % CHG for 2 baths or showers is an adequate way to begin skin antisepsis
in patients scheduled for surgery. This practice has been studied in relation to
vascular catheter-related infection and shown to be effective. [4] Although the
discussion about the addition of alcohol to the product used for cleaning the
vascular catheter insertion site is ongoing, (because alcohol is an effective and rapid-
acting skin antiseptic), the 2% aqueous solution is less irritating for patients to use
in a shower or bath.
As noted above, controversy exists about the use of 2% CHG-based preparations for
cleansing vascular catheter insertion sites. In their 2002 Guidelines for the
Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, O'Grady and associates note
that a 4 % chlorhexidine-based preparation is preferred. [5] This recommendation
was based on the 1991 study by Maki and colleagues that demonstrated that 2%
aqueous CHG was more effective than aqueous povidone-iodine in reducing
catheter-related infections.[4] During the public comment period for the 2009
updated draft guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related
Infections a suggestion that practitioners "...use a greater than 0.5% alcoholic
chlorhexidine gluconate-based preparation for skin antisepsis" was made. [6] Two
new studies support this suggestion.
Study results demonstrated a rate of S aureus infection of 3.4% (17 of 504 patients)
in the mupirocin-CHG group compared with 7.7% (32 of 413 patients) in the
placebo group. The effect of mupirocin-CHG treatment was most pronounced for
deep SSIs -- 0.9% for the mupirocin-CHG group vs 4.4% for the placebo group. Thus,
these researchers from The Netherlands drew the conclusion that rapid nasal
screening for S aureus followed by decolonization of the nose and skin with
mupirocin ointment and CHG soap significantly reduced hospital-acquired S aureus
infections. In an accompanying editorial, infection control expert Richard Wenzel,
MD, suggested that the screening protocol could be reserved for patients having
cardiac surgery, receiving implants, or who are immunocompromised. [10]
To conclude, your question is a very thoughtful one. I believe it is safe to say that the
use of aqueous 4% CHG for the 2 recommended preoperative baths or showers is
indeed adequate to begin the process of surgical skin antisepsis.
Bu saya kirim kembali, kemarin tdk sampai
Dear ibu-ibu
FYI,
INS is now accepting applications for Ireta scholarship, which is intended to support
international nurses to participate their annual meeting in Las Vegas.
In 2011, Sai Bala Madathil from India received the prestigious award and recognized
during the INS annual meeting in Kentucky.
Application Requirement:
One-page summary to demonstrate how attending an INS National Meeting
will benefit their patients, community, and practice by contributing to the
base of infusion knowledge in their country.
The applicant must also demonstrate how the knowledge gained at an INS
meeting might be incorporated into existing modes of infusion care abroad.
Application must be submitted in English.
Fill up the attached form (page 6).
Ask the customer to send directly the (1) application form and (2) one-
page summary to Christopher Hunt, Executive Vice President of INS through his
email Chris.Hunt@ins1.org
Application timeline:
January 11 Call for Application begins
February 10 Application process closes
March Review and selection completed
Jadi:
Regards