Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Any profession can be done well and any profession can be done badly and teaching, like being a
footballer, a banker or a refuse collector, can be done in both excellent and abysmal ways and I
guess, most of us fall somewhere in between.
As we pondered upon the poem in class today, I could see the irony today in teaching it - a poem
that warns us not to break it down into 'themes' or focus on techniques such as 'assonance' is now a
poem sat in the middle of an anthology, so that if students are to be successful in their exam, they
kind of need to do some of the stuff we're warned not to by an angry Duffy.
The poem as a whole is a scathing criticism of a teacher who treats Duffy and poetry poorly - the
teacher is given a dramatic monologue in which to dig her own professional grave as Duffy uses the
persona to criticise all sorts of things:
The attitude poetry is easy to knock out: "Perhaps we're going to witness verse hot from the press."
Racism: "Those of you with English Second Language, see me after break."
Old-fashioned attitudes: "Seasons of mists and so on and so forth" ['Seasons of mist' is a quote from
a poem by John Keats, a Romantic 18th century poet].
Lack of courtesy: "Unfortunately I have to dash. Tracey will show you out."
These are just some of the ways in which the teacher undermines herself. However, as my class
turned this poem into drama, it seemed that it was Duffy herself who came off worst. I hadn't really
considered this angle, but when the boys in my class (and it was boys who seemed to revel in the
role of Duffy) created her, she came across as arrogant and her criticisms seemed almost elitist as if
this lowly English teacher who was introducing her was beneath her. This seems a harsh criticism to
make of Duffy, but not one that lacks any validity, the argument being that if she had criticised one
person for a poor attitude, then that would be fair enough, but by titling the poem, 'Head of English' -
an impersonal title - she is being critical of a whole profession. Considering her praise of teachers in
other poems, it is difficult to believe that Duffy doesn't value teachers, but taking this poem in
isolation can paint a negative image of Duffy as this poem does, although I think the boy who
donned lipstick and a hair flower in order to become Duffy painted her in a far more negative light.