Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Soil Mechanics II
Course Instructor
Sai K. Vanapalli
A015(CBY)
sai.vanapalli@uottawa.ca
(613)562-5800 Ext. 6638
1
Introduction
Foundation Engineering is a clever combination of soil mechanics, engineering
geology and proper judgment derived from engineering experience.
Foundation engineering to some extent can be considered as ART
What information is required to design a foundation?
Load from superstructure (such as dead load, live load etc.)
Stability (i.e., f(τf)) and deformation (i.e., f(∆V) properties of soils
Geological conditions
Soil type
Depth and thickness
Engineering properties
Hydrogeology
Site investigations (i.e., subsurface exploration)
2
Introduction
Weathering of Rocks
Dense Loose
N.C. O.C.
3
Shallow foundations
Shallow foundations are used when you have favourable soils such as coarse
grained soils ( i.e., high shear strength, τf and low deformation, ∆H)
4
Shallow foundations
If sum of areas of spread footing = ½ of total area use Mat (or Raft) foundations.
Mat foundations are used to reduce differential settlement between adjacent
areas (for soils having low bearing capacity or where soil conditions are variable
and erratic).
5
Shallow foundations
6
Deep foundations
7
Major purpose of foundations
To transfer the loads from the superstructure to the earth safely such that the
supporting soil is not overstressed and the deformations would cause no serious
settlement of the superstructure.
Foundation classification depends on Df / B ratio (where Df is the depth of
foundation and B is the width of the foundation).
The soil-foundation system is responsible for providing support for the lifetime of
a structure
Foundations should be designed for the worst conditions that may develop during
its lifetime.
Structural loads (dead and live loads)
Load effects that may result from environmental factors such as wind, ice,
frost, heat, water, earthquake, and explosive blasts.
8
Shallow or deep foundations
Establish the loads supplied by the structural loads (i.e. dead load and live load).
Shallow foundations (2 to 3 m depth) if the upper soils are competent.
Deep foundation if the loads are large (say 200 kN).
Other factors: Bearing capacity (stability and deformation properties of soils).
Stability: Depends on the shear strength parameters, c’ and φ’.
Deformation: ρ total = ρ elastic + ρ consolidation + ρ sec ondary
NOTE: In many situations, ρt is controlled by code provisions
9
Characteristics of shallow foundations
Df ≤ B to 3B
Df = depth from ground level to the base
of footing
B = width of footing
Foundation or footing should be below
depth of frost penetration, undermining
by scour and preferably below zone of
seasonal change. Can be very difficult to
meet all these criteria and sometimes
impractical.
Footing must not break into ground (i.e.
safe against overall shear failure).
Footing must not settle excessively.
10
Foundation design consideration
The soil bearing capacity is the pressure that a foundation unit can impose onto
the supporting earth mass without causing overstressing (shear failure).
Deformations occurring because of foundation loading usually cause settlement.
Lateral movements associated with settlement are also of concern.
Failure of foundations can be due to:
Shear failure (based on the permissible load)
Settlement failure (permissible settlement)
11
Estimate/determine the bearing capacity of soils
Bearing capacity equations: shear strength
properties of the soil (takes into account only
shear failure criteria) (NOT SETTLEMENT! Don’t
know what will be the settlement)
Penetration resistance data (i.e. such as the
SPT data) and relate it to the bearing capacity
and settlement characteristics of the soil.
(Commonly used for sandy soils and shallow
foundations. Such design approaches are not
available for all type of soils and foundations).
Takes into account shear strength and
settlement: Good design approach.
12
Estimate/determine the bearing capacity of soils
Relating soil type to presumptive bearing
capacity recommended by building codes
(Limitation: do not consider the soil
compressibility and the possible influence of
poorer soil layers under the bearing layer).
Not a good approach for foundation design.
(reliable only if you have prior experience)
Field load tests (commonly used for pile
foundations).
Test results related to both carrying capacity
and settlement (Expensive)
Careful evaluation
For every 10 piles, 1 pile is fully tested.
13
Estimate/determine the bearing capacity of soils
14
Footing behavior - general shear failure
Well-defined failure mode
Dense and coarse-grained soils
φ’ ≥ 36o, Dr ≥ 71%
The ground surface adjacent to the
footing bulges upward.
Soil displacement is accompanied by
tilting of the foundation.
15
Footing behavior – local shear failure
Has both general shear and punching shear failure characteristics.
Any increment of load is associated with foundation settlement.
39% ≤ Dr ≤ 71%, φ’ = 24 to 28°
16
Footing behavior – punching shear failure
No defined failure load (occurs in soils with plastic properties).
Footing sinks, very large settlement
Dr ≤ 39%
Test at
greater
depth
17
Definitions and terminology
Ps
Gross bearing pressure, q at the base
of foundation: P +P
q=
s f
A
Total vertical stress (overburden
Df pressure): q = γ D
Pf 0 f
18
Definitions and terminology
Floating foundation
Take advantage of load of soil removed by excavation. qn =q − q0 =0
Ultimate bearing capacity, qu: bearing pressure of soil at failure conditions.
From an engineering practice point of view, we do not load a foundation close to
ultimate bearing capacity of the soil to avoid failure conditions (i.e. strength or
deformation failure).
qu − q0
Net safe bearing capacity qns =
FS
Safe bearing capacity, (Footing will not fail, but settlement may be excessive).
q=s qns + γ D f
19
Definitions and terminology
Typically FS: between 2.5 to 3
Dead load
Live load
Variability of deposit
Extent of site investigation
Reliability of shear strength parameters
FS = 4 or even higher for pile foundations
Allowable bearing capacity, qa is the bearing pressure that will not cause
excessive settlement (i.e. to limit the settlements to some allowable limit ρa, it is
necessary to reduce the bearing pressure to some value qa).
qa < qs < qu
20
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory (for
drained loading conditions)
General bearing capacity equation
valid for strip footings (i.e. continuous
footing with an infinite length).
21
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory
(for drained loading conditions)
Terzaghi assuming general shear failure conditions proposed bearing capacity
equation in terms of shear strength parameters, unit weight, depth and width of
foundation for drained loading as given below:
1
qu =c′N c + qN q + γ BNγ
2
22
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory
(important notes)
Shear strength properties at the base of the footing!
Only width and depth
Shear strength of a soil by its angle of internal friction only (φ’ in drained loading
conditions (typically φ’ > 36) (General Shear Failure: GSF)
Non-cemented soils: c’ ≈ 0
Nc, Nq and Nγ = f(φ’ )
Different bearing capacity factors available in the literature with small
differences.
You can stick to the values available in the text book. The charts given in your text
book are reproduced on the next page.
Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual
23
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory
24
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory
General shear failure Local shear failure
25
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory
φ ′ = tan −1 ( 2 3 tan φ ′ )
26
Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity theory
Terzaghi’s bearing capacity equation for continuous strip footings under drained
loading conditions.
qu = c′N c + qN q + 1 2 γ B Nγ
Do not use c’ value in the bearing capacity equation unless there is enough
evidence with respect to cohesion value, say in the form of soil cementation.
27
Effect of groundwater table on the bearing capacity
qu = c′N c + qN q + 1 2 γ b B Nγ
Case I (0 ≤ D1 ≤ Df)
D1γ + D2 (γ sat − γ w )
q=
γ=
b γ=′ γ sat − γ w
Case II (0 ≤ d ≤ B)
q = γ Df
d
γ′
γ b =+ (γ − γ ′)
B
Case III (B ≤ d): no effect
28
DGD Problem 1
A square column foundation has to carry a gross allowable load of 1805 kN (FS = 3).
Given: Df = 1.5m, γ = 15.9 kN/m3, φ’ = 34°, and c’ = 0 kPa.
Use Terzaghi’s equation to determine the size of the foundation (B). Assuming
general shear failure.
29
The general bearing capacity equation
Ultimate bearing capacity equation
continuous, square and circular foundations (not rectangular foundation)
Influence of shearing resistance in the surcharge loading region
Inclination of load of the foundation
Meyerhof (1963)
30
General bearing capacity equation
Meyerhof (1963) from Canada
Depth factors are ignored in soil layer above the footing. However, soil
confinement increases as depth increases. Due to this reason, depth factors are ≥
1.
Inclination factor is a load reduction factor and is less than 1.
Shape factor due to influence of cohesion and surcharge ≥ 1 and due to unit
weight < 1.
31
General bearing capacity equation
32
General bearing capacity equation
Depth factor (Hansen, 1970)
for D f / B ≤ 1, φ ′ > 0 for D f / B ≤ 1, φ ′ =
0
1 − Fqd Df
F= Fqd − Fcd = 1 + 0.4
N c tan φ ′
cd
B
Df F= F=
γd 1
1 + 2 tan φ (1 − sin φ )
qd
Fqd = ′ ′
2
B
Fγ d = 1
33
The general bearing capacity equation
34
DGD Problem 2
35
DGD Problem 3
The applied load on a shallow square foundation makes an angle of 15° with the
vertical. Given: B = 1.83m, Df = 0.9m, γ = 18.08 kN/m3, φ’ = 25, and c’ = 23.96 kN/m2.
Use FS = 4 and determine the gross allowable load. (General bearing capacity
equation)
36
Eccentrically load foundations
37
Eccentrically load foundations
(Effective area method, Meyerhof, 1953)
In addition to vertical loads,
foundations are subjected to
moments (example, base of retaining
walls).
The pressure distribution under such
loading conditions is not uniform .
Q 6e
=
qmax 1 +
BL B
Q 6e
=
qmin 1 −
BL B
38
Eccentrically load foundations
Q 6e
=
qmin 1 −
BL B
= M e B= / 6 qmin 0
e=
Q e > B / 6 qmin =
( −)
tensions (i.e., cracks will develop);
separation between the
foundation and the underlying
soil.
Exact distribution of pressure is
difficult to estimate.
39
Meyerhof’s effective area method
Step 1: effective dimensions
B’ = effective width = B – 2e
L = effective length = L
Note: if the eccentricity is in the direction of length, then, L’= L-2e and B’ = B.
40
DGD Problem 4
A continuous foundation is shown in the figure below. If the load eccentricity is 0.2
m, determine the ultimate load, Qult per unit length of the foundation. Use
Meyerhof’s effective area method.
41
Bearing capacity equation for undrained loading Conditions
Foundations on clay soils which are typically in a state of saturated condition and
are frequently loaded much more rapidly than which the pore-water pressures
can dissipate.
For such cases, the concept of φu = 0 should be used for determining the ultimate
bearing capacity of soils. In other words, undrained shear strength, su (in some
cases term cu is used) describes the shear strength of soil.
For φu = 0 , the bearing capacity factors Nc, Nq and Nγ are 5.7 (Terzaghi)/5.14
(Genral bearing capacity), 1 and zero respectively (This set of values should be
remembered).
φu = 0, c = cu
42
Bearing capacity equation for undrained loading Conditions
qu =c′N c + γ D f N q + 1 2 Bγ Nγ
qu =5.7cu + γ D f (1) + 1 2 Bγ (0)
qu 5.7cu + γ D f
43
Bearing capacity equation for undrained loading Conditions
Skempton (1951): φu = 0
Df B
qn =5.14cu 1 + 0.4 1 + 0.2
B L
44
DGD Problem 5
45
Factor of safety
A safety factor is introduced into geotechnical stability in order to ensure
reasonable safety of earthworks, earth retaining structures and foundations,
design, and construction.
Safety factor may be defined as the ratio of the resistance of the earth structure
or foundation to the applied load effects to ensure freedom from danger, loss or
unacceptable risk (Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual).
Global factor of safety value is typically in the range of 1.3 to 3.0. This factor of
safety depends on how well we are able to define dead load, live load, variability
of deposit, extent of investigation and reliability of strength parameters.
46
Factor of safety
Terzaghi and Peck (1967) suggested customary safety factors (also called as global
safety factors) which are summarized below:
Failure type Item Safety factor, F
47
Factor of safety
Various influences affecting the margin of safety in earthwork and foundation are
the variability of the loads and load effects and of the soil resistance (Meyerhof,
1970)
Meyerhof (1982) introduced a more consistent approach (leading to a more
uniform margin of safety for different types and components of earth structures
and foundations under different loading conditions) by using partial safety
factors.
Ultimate Limit States (ULS): Uses load factors that are greater than one and
factored strength parameters that are less than one. These factors are based on
structural working stress design (consistent with structural design concepts);
supported by probability studies of variability of various types of loading (Allen
1975).
48
Factor of safety
Category Item Load factor Load factor
Symbol Value
Loads Dead loads fd 1.25 (0.8)
49
Factor of safety
The load factors are provided mainly for variability and pattern of loading, which
differ for dead loads, live and environmental loads, and water pressures.
The resistance factors (i.e. strength) take into account mainly the variability and
uncertainty of the assessment of shear strength parameters.
50
Thank You
for
Your Attention
51