Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Configuration of the new framework for international economic relations after the IIW.
1. The Great Depression. Important economic phenomen Crisis (1929-1939) –crack del
1929 and the crisis of the capitalist world. German suffered a lot in the crisis which
put Hitler as the winner of the elections. This vulnebarility change politics
prespective.
2. The Second World War. (1939-1945)
3. The Cold War (1947-1989) USA liberalist, free market, democratic political system.
Soviet Union Communism, economic planning, no democratic system, no free
market. Conflict between two political and economical powers. But also all the
world was divided.
elections of 1945 open the way to these policies. (after the country asking people to fight
for their country could not no help them with a new economy)
Economy started to improve and also reduced inequality. (1945-1973 all good) after that
crisis of oil.
Entorn Econòmic
Maria Faura Pardo
La USSR first participated but later on stooped, it didn’t participate in the FMI , international
bank.
Keynes’ obsession was that governments could make monetary and fiscal countercyclical
policies.
Under Keynesian economics domestic equilibrium had not to be subordinated to foreign
equilibrium.
Gold standard, 2 consequences why Keynes was against the gold standar:
-fix exchange rate of gold
If there is unemployment, one of the policies recommended is to print more money. With
gold , policies couldn’t print more money because maybe banks didn’t had all that quantity
of gold.
Under the gold standard goverments were not able to do contraiclial policies.
It was through that fixed exchange rates gave stability and promoted international trade.
Main characteristics of the Bretton Woods system:
Fixed exchange rate (but it was possible to change parties) ($convertible to gold;
other currencies convertible to $):
IMF(international organization) could finance temporary foreign deficits (current
account plus foreign direct investment) (but few money). International bank wanted
to finance temporary foreign deficit , it will have to change their exchange rates
(devolve your currency and make exports cheaper. )Curt termini, trade deficit.
Capital flows controls when necessary.
Mundell-Fleming trilemma:
To supply the world’s risk-free asset ($), the country at the heart of the international
monetary system (USA) had to run a foreign deficit. In doing so, it became more indebted to
foreigners until the risk-free asset ($) ceased to be risk-free.
Most of the currencies had yo be convertible to dollars in order to be able to print more of
their own currency. Dollars worked as gold. Everybody wanted dollars, usa had a lot of
gold). International pressure to the USA to print more dollars. In the 60s usa proposed a
more relaxed economic system.
This contradiction became unsustainable in August 1971 and Nixon suspended the
convertibility of the dollar into gold.
This was the end of the Bretton Woods system and the beginning of the floating exchange-
rate era.
Mundell-Fleming trilemma:
BRETTON WOODS POST BRETTON WOODS
Fixed exchange rates Fixed exchange rates
Free capital movement Free capital movement
Independent monetary policy Independent monetary policy
During these years of mixed economies and the Bretton Woods system capitalist economies
grew faster than ever and no serious financial crisis happened.
The oil crisis of 1973 stopped this Golden and Keynesian Age.
Financial stability
Aggregate Demand management
Social peace
High levels of consumption
But also other helped:
Structural change
Technological catching-up
Entorn Econòmic
Maria Faura Pardo
1. Why does Tony Just say “The years 1941-45 were just an interlude in an international
struggle between democracies and Soviet totalitarianism”? (p. 5)
2. What was the American post-war strategy until 1947? Did it reach its objectives? (p. 110)
3. What does Tony Judt mean when he says “[in mid-1947] France urgently needed not just
AmericanaidbutGermanrecovery”? (p.11)
4. What does Tony Judt mean when he says “if you could not destroy Germany, then join
her up to a European framework in which she could do no harm militarily but much good
economically”? (p.11)
5. Which strategy had USA, UK, France and USSR on Germany, and how did they change it in
the period 1945-48?