Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
168559
Faculty of Engineering
June 2016
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost I am grateful to God that had granted me good health
throughout this one year to complete my project. I would like also to express my
deepest gratitude to my parents and family who have been supported me and being a
source of motivation from beginning of this final year project until I finished writing
Norkhairunnisa Mazlan and examiners Ir. Dr. Mohamed Thariq bin Haji Hameed
Sultan and Dr. Chia Chen Ciang who has guide me to carry out my project, gives
thousand of helpful advice, revise my thesis draft and corrected my final draft report
until I can submit full report on time. I place on record, my sincere thanks to staff in
facilities and teach me how to use related machine used in my project. Not to forget,
me used their lab and facilities related to complete my project. Finally, I took this
i
ABSTRACT
properties that could replace the use synthetic fibre. Due to the low cost and
Kenaf fibre is used as natural fibre and combines with synthetic fibre which is glass
fibre to make hybrid kenaf/ glass composite. Kenaf fibre is chosen due to its
significant mechanical properties compared to other natural fibre 20. Glass fibre is
composite used epoxy as the matrix and silicone filler as matrix modification. In this
research, nanoclay and carbon nanotube is used as filler with percent of 1-wt%, 3-
wt%, 5-wt% and 7-wt%. From the flexural and impact test, the optimum
performance is at 3-wt% filler. For nanoclay sample, S3 the flexural strength and
modulus are 1726.69Mpa and 124.41Gpa respectively. While for carbon nanotube
sample, S7 the flexural strength and modulus are 9% and 20% lesser than S3
As for water absorption test, all samples with addition filler give low water uptake
ii
ABSTRAK
gentian sintetik. Disebabkan oleh kos yang rendah dan sumber yang boleh
ini, gentian kenaf adalah salah satu gentian semulajadi akan digabungkan dengan
gentian kaca untuk membuat kenaf hybrid kaca komposit. Gentian kenaf dipilih oleh
kerana sifat-sifat mekanikalnya yang lebih baik berbanding gentian semulajadi yang
lain. Sementara itu, gentian kaca ditambah adalah untuk mengukuhkan sifat-sifat
mekanikal komposit hibrid. Dalam komposit hibrid ini, jenis maktrik yang digunakan
ialah epoksi dan silicon pengisi digunakan sebagai pengubahsuaian matrik epoksi.
Dalam kajian ini, nanoclay dan karbon nanotiub digunakan sebagai pengisi dengan
pelbagai peratus iaitu 1%, 3%, 5% dan 7% berat. Dari ujian lentur dan kesan
pengisi. Untuk sampel nanoclay (S3), kekuatan lenturan dan modulus masing-masing
ialah 1726.69MPa dan 124.41GPa. Manakala bagi sampel karbon nanotiub (S7),
kekuatan lenturan dan modulus masing-masing ialah 9% dan 20% rendah daripada
sampel S3. Disamping itu, S3 menyerap tenaga 17.063J dan S7 menyerap tenaga
sebanyak 13.907J. Tambahan lagi, bagi ujian penyerapan air, semua sample dengan
iii
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................ ii
CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1
1.0 Problem Statement ........................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................... 3
LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Composite Material ........................................................................................................... 4
CHAPTER 3 ......................................................................................................................... 42
METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 42
3.1 Materials ......................................................................................................................... 42
3.2 Specimen preparation ...................................................................................................... 43
3.3 Flexural test ..................................................................................................................... 44
3.4 Impact test ....................................................................................................................... 45
3.5 Water Absorption Test .................................................................................................... 45
3.6 Morphology observation ................................................................................................. 46
CHAPTER 4 ......................................................................................................................... 47
RESULT ............................................................................................................................... 47
4.1 Flexural test ..................................................................................................................... 47
4.2 Impact test ....................................................................................................................... 51
4.3 Water absorption test....................................................................................................... 53
CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................... 56
REFERENCE........................................................................................................................ 59
APPENDIX………………………………………………………………………………….65
iv
List of table
v
List of figure
vi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In the recent decades, the combination of natural fibre composite based glass
fibre has been one of the major interesting research subjects due to increase in
market demand that needed composite with low cost but has good performance.
Furthermore, natural fibres are lighter and cheaper which can be obtained by natural
application that use natural fibre mats is on automotive application which is car
mechanical properties and to determine which natural fibre gives superior result. In
this research, the focus is on the study of the mechanical properties which is flexural
testing, impact testing and water absorption behaviour of nanocomposite. One of the
The aim of this present work is to study the hybridization of kenaf fibre and
glass fibre mat with the inclusion of nanofiller. The study was conducted at first
varying the filler content and performing the mechanical testing and water absorption
test. Finally, a comparison is made to find out which composite gives the best
performance.
1
1.0 Problem Statement
For many years, the manufacturing of polymer composite matrix (PMC) has
automotive, medical devices and naval applications. PMCs contain matrix and
reinforce fibre in which about 50 percent reinforcing fibre by volume. The examples
of reinforce fibre carbon/graphite, glass, aramid, kenaf (natural fibre) and many
more.
A few recent years ago, natural fibre has growing extensively in term of
market demand. Due to its low weight, low density, low cost, biodegrable, higher
strength and stiffness2 3, natural fibre become one of the most popular material for
composites application. Because of PMC do not rust, it has good corrosion resistance
characteristic over steel or galvanized steel. Since both PMC and natural fibre are
used in many industries, there is a need to reinforce PMC and natural fibre with new
material for better result (materials properties). The current composites already
posses good mechanical properties, but with the idea of addition of nanofillers to the
The reason why PMC need to be improved is because to fulfil high demand
in high risk industries that need a very strong material that has ability to delay
nanotube, nanoclay, aerojel and nanofibre are expected to give better performance
than current reinforcement of PMC. This research will focus on polymer matrix of
2
1.1 Objectives
composites.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
3
2.1 Composite Material
there are more researches carried out to combine new types of composite material to
fulfil market demand. Composite material consists of reinforcing phase and matrix
phase. Usually, the reinforcing phase is stronger, harder and provides high stiffness
than matrix. The reinforcement is usually fibre or particles. There are several layup
Meanwhile, the matrix phase will hold fibres together and acts as medium to
transfer stress between fibres. The matrix can be polymer, ceramics or metal.
4
Furthermore, matrix is responsible to ensure proper orientation and spacing between
matrix and reinforcing phase. Matrix also protect the reinforce fibre from abrasion
and the environment. The major types of composites are metal matrix composite
(MMC), ceramic matrix composite (CMC), and polymer matrix composite (PMC). 4
two types of matrix in PMC which are thermoplastics resin and thermoset resin.
resin.
Advantages
5
fiber.
esters. At first, a thermoset will start at low viscosity resin that react and cures during
processing, forming and intractable solid between fibres. Among those types of
thermosets, epoxy is important matrix for fibres reinforced polymer which had been
used in many industries. The advantages of epoxy are it has high strength and
modulus, low shrinkage and last but not least it has excellent chemical and heat
resistance.5 Figure 2.2 shows the variation of tensile strength and modulus for
polyester, epoxy and vinyl ester. As can be seen, epoxy has relatively good tensile
It has been well known about the manufacture of natural fibre reinforced
polymer because of its significant advantages. . Table 2.2 shows the advantages and
6
synthetic material that is not manmade. It is originated from plants or animals.
Animal fibres contain wool, silk, and avian fibre. It includes sheep’s wool, goat hair,
feathers and so on. The plants produce cellulose fibre such as bast fibres, seed fibres,
leaf fibres, grass and reed fibres, and core fibres. The examples of that cellulose are
Advantages Disadvantages
• Low cost • High moisture absorption
• Low density • Lower durability than synthetic
• Good thermal and mechanical fiber composite (can be improved
resistivity with treatment)
• Environmental friendly • Lower processing temperatures
(renewable source) limiting matrix options
• Desirable fiber aspect ratio • Lower strength compared to
• High specific stiffness and synthetic fibre composite
strength
7
Bast Jute, flax, ramie, hemp, kenaf
Seed Cotton, coir, kapok
Leaf Sisal, pineapple, abaca
Grass and reed Rice, corn, wheat
Core Hemp, kenaf, jute
low weight and low cost. Other significant advantages of fibre reinforced polymer
are has good mechanical properties such as tensile and flexural modulus and
renewable resources. In this study, woven kenaf fibre is chosen to be reinforced fibre
with thermoset matrix including hybrid composite. In this research paper will be
8
make
comparison
9
absorption
test.
7 Kenaf/ Dry After Dr Aft Authors Osman,E
Polyester water y er focus on et al.
abs. wat untreated (2011)
test er fibre. 13
abs.
Should
test
compare
both treat
0 wt% - Very low and
- - - -
kenaf untreated
fibre
10 wt% - Low
kenaf 58 23 3.8 1.5
10
2.2.1 Woven kenaf fibre
Hibiscus family is a biodegradable and environmental friendly crop. There are three
types of fibre which is more related to the constituent of kenaf plant which are bast,
Whereas cellulose content is depend on several aspects which are fibre length, fibre
loading or volume fraction of fibres, fibre aspect ratio, fibre orientation or interfacial
adhesion between fibre-matrix.16 In addition, it has been reported that tensile and
found that kenaf bast fibre possess good mechanical properties as compared to kenaf
As shown in Table 2.4, kenaf exhibit good mechanical properties than other natural
fibres.
11
Pineapple 400-627 1.44 14.5 0.8-1.6
Curaua 500-1150 11.8 3.7-4.3 1.4
woven fabric mat. Woven fabric is much more attractive form because it provides
There are several researches had been done to investigate the effect of woven
21
Alavudeen et al. (2015) conduct research to investigate the effect of weaving
They observed that the strength of composite depends on weave pattern, fiber
orientation and the bonding between fibre and matrix. The types of weave patterns
used are plain and twirl types. From the result obtained, plain woven gives the higher
12
tensile and flexural strength than twirl woven composite. This might be due to the
uniform distribution of stress transfer when tensile load is applied on both transverse
and longitudinal directions. The authors also stated that the fibre in plain woven
structure are interlaces one-to-one in both weft and warp direction which is not
presence in twirl woven. The experimental result of flexural and impact strength is
shown in Table 2.6. From the result, for individual fibre composites, kenaf/polyester
due to the densified structure of kenaf fibre which contributed in high flexural
strength. For impact strength, it depends on the interfacial and interlaminar adhesion
between fibre and the matrix. However, for the same weaving pattern impact strength
22
Arifuzzaman Khan et al. (2013) done a comparison between woven jute fabric
(WJF) and non-woven with poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) was conducted to study its
mechanical properties which are tensile, flexural and impact. This research also
tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength, flexural modulus and impact
strength. The result also shows that the mechanical properties in warp direction is
13
highest than in weft direction. Mechanical result of warp direction is different form
weft direction because of higher yarn and low density of warp direction. The overall
From Table 2.7, flexural behaviour showed higher value in warp direction
than weft direction. This is due to the short yarns in weft direction of composites
limit their distributiom of tensile stress. When the tensile stress tries to propagate
For impact test, woven fabric cause fibre yarns of warp direction cross over fibre at
The impact strength for both directions is higher than unreinforced PLLA.
This indicates that woven fabric is good as they interact with the crack formation in
the matrix and at the same time act as stress-transferring medium. Result of impact
strength also shows higher value in warp direction because it contained higher
aligned fibre and thus produced composites with higher resistance to impact stress.
14
At weft direction:
For the few decades, there was increasingly demand on product that used
kenaf material such as paper product, building material, absorbent and livestock feed.
Previous study has reported that kenaf has good strength and low density enough to
replace glass fibres that requires much higher energy to produce it. Due to low cost
composite. For every research that had been done, the result is different which is due
24
Bakar et al. (2014) reported a research on low velocity impact resistant on
composites. The kenaf fibre loading is varied from 10 wt-% to 25 wt-%. From the
kenaf/epoxy.
composites based on its mechanical properties. From the result shows in Table 2.8,
impact energy increase as the fibre loading increased. This indicates good adhesion
strength than kenaf/epoxy because impact strength of polyester resin is higher than
epoxy. Besides, the deflection of composite at maximum load is depends on the fibre
content.
25
S. Rassmann et al. (2010) conduct a research regarding on effect of resin system
laminates. The resins used in this experiment were polyester, vinyl ester and epoxy.
Table 2.9 shows the result of resin system on different kenaf fibre volume content.
From the result obtained in this research, it can be concluded here that epoxy resin
16
system has good strength values since epoxy resulted in good tensile strength and
flexural strength than polyester and vinyl ester. The authors stated that high or low
increase.
Table 2.9 Result of resin system on mechanical properties of kenaf fibre laminates 25
For the polyester resin, from the result polyester has good modulus and
impact properties. For vinyl ester resin, it has good water absorption characteristics
as it absorb less water than polyester and epoxy resin. Furthermore, from scanning
microscope it is found out that epoxy resin bonds is better than the others as epoxy
laminates failed by fibre fracture while polyester laminates failed by fibre pull-out
17
and vinyl ester failed by two combination of these. Figure 2.4 shows the SEM
c) Epoxy
26
Naveenkumar R et al. (2014) conducted a research to compare mechanical
properties between jute and kenaf fibre reinforced with epoxy resin. From the result
from this research, it shows that kenaf fibre possessed superior mechanical properties
than jute fibre. For the impact test, the response in each fibre composites indicates a
failure process involving crack initiation and growth in the fibre breakage, fibre pull-
out, delaminating and disbanding. The overall result is presented in Table 2.10.
18
Table 2.10 Result of mechanical properties
from the SEM images for flexural test it show fracture in fibre bundle and
incomplete distribution of fibre and matrix. The image of jute fibre as shown in
Figure 2.5 b) shows fibre pull out that might explain low impact strength than kenaf
composite.
19
a) Kenaf fibre
b) Jute fibre
Yakubu Dan-mallam et al. (2015) 27 study the behaviour of interwoven kenaf/ PET
20
Table 2.11 Result of fabricated composite
The reason why the flexural strength increase when the fibre content is
Other factors that attribute to increase in flexural strength are due to interlocking
between fibre and matrix that cause short delamination which result in high flexural
modulus. For impact strength, the hybrid composite show improvement than neat
decreasing of absorption of water. This is due to the drop in void content that cause
28
Abu bakar et al. (2011) compared the mechanical properties of kenaf/epoxy
composite with and without liquid epoxidized natural rubber (LENR) in epoxy resin.
With the presence of LENR in kenaf/epoxy composite, the flexural properties are
higher than without LENR and neat epoxy. Based on result obtained, the optimum
performance of flexural properties was at 20% fibre. The result is show in Table
21
2.12. The flexural properties increase up to 20% fibre and decrease when further
increase the fibre content. Factor that may contribute to this increase is good
interfacial strength between fibre and matrix. With the presence of LENR in the
epoxy cause strong interface and improved the flexural strength of composite. The
result also show a decrease in flexural strength at 25% fibre which may be cause by
poor adhesion between fibre and matrix and also presence voids.
modification of LENR in the matrix. This toughening behaviour gave good energy
In this research, kenaf fibre is hybridized with glass fibre and reinforced with
epoxy resin. Combination of natural and synthetic fibre produced composite with
good mechanical properties than single constituent natural fibre reinforced polymer.
natural and synthetic fibre. It is proven that hybrid natural and synthetic fibre gives
22
greater resistance to water absorption, cost saving by using of renewable fibre,
29
weight saving and improved in properties. The following researches are some
30
Davoodi, M. M. et al. (2011) study the impact property of adding polybutylene
other mechanical properties such as tensile and flexural properties. They compare
three samples which are glass/epoxy composite, hybrid kenaf/glass epoxy composite
As a result, impact strength in the presence of PBT was higher than without
the addition of PBT. This is because, the PBT particles were uniformly dispersed
which increased the interlaminate shear of epoxy resin film between plies.
Consequently energy absorption and toughness of the hybrid composite will increase.
As expected, glass/epoxy composite resulted in higher impact strength than other two
23
For flexural properties, hybrid kenaf/glass which is without PBT particle
show the highest value of flexural strength and modulus followed by hybrid
31
Atiqah et al. (2013) investigated mechanical properties of kenaf-glass (KG) fibres
treated and untreated kenaf fibre toward the properties of hybrid composite. In their
work, unsaturated polyester resin and KG fibre at ratio of 70:30 by volume were
used. In addition, kenaf and glass fibre composition are varied by volume for
The result obtained shows that combination of (15/15 v/v) KG fibre gives
good mechanical properties than other combination. In other word, 15/15 v/v KG
fibre is the optimum and suitable combination among others. As expected, hybrid
composite with treated kenaf shows higher properties (flexural,tensile and impact)
than untreated kenaf. For flexural test, hybrid treated kenaf-glass show highest value
which is 453.22 MPa at 15/15 KG treated kenaf gives high value because of
For impact test, the result shows good impact strength at 15/15 v/v hybrid KG
which is 146.43 MPa. As mentioned before, treated kenaf give good properties than
untreated which is because treated sample did not slip into layer after impact testing.
Furthermore, fibre mat orientation which was randomly oriented can withstand the
impact force. In addition, for impact test the impact strength of the composite is
higher at higher glass fibre content. At higher kenaf fibre content, the composite
24
cannot withstand higher impact loading and resulting less toughness and more brittle
properties.
32
Muhammad et al. (2015) study the effect of adding liquid epoxidized natural
rubber (LENR) toward hybrid kenaf-glass reinforced epoxy composite. They also
compare treated and untreated kenaf fibre toward properties of hybrid composite.
without LENR are higher than neat epoxy. In addition, with the presence of LENR
both impact and flexural properties show an increment compare with hybrid
composite without LENR. The fibre treatment enhances the impact property which is
due to better interfacial adhesion between fibres and matrix. Presence of LENR plays
on many factors such as toughness of the reinforcement, frictional work for example
fibre pulling and nature of interfacial region. Furthermore voids, bubbles or any
25
For flexural test, the plasticising effect of LENR increases the flexibility of
the composite and consequently more force was needed for debonding. This resulted
in high flexural strength value. Flexural modulus value of hybrid composites also
increase with the addition of LENR. This might be due to toughening effect of LENR
33
Salleh et al. (2012) investigated water absorption test of hybrid kenaf/glass
From the result obtained, moisture content increases with immersion time.
After 3rd week, the highest moisture content of hybrid long kenaf/glass is the one that
immersed in rain water which is 10.95 wt% followed by distilled water 9.99 wt% and
sea water 9.01 wt%. Composite that was immersed in sea water show the lowest
weight gain due to presence of ionic salt in the sea water. This ionic salt blocks the
diffusion path after a long exposure and thus slowing down the absorption process.
34
Sathish et al. (2014) investigate the mechanical properties of hybrid banana-
kenaf/glass reinforced epoxy composite. They study the effect of varying fibre
used in this research are vertical, horizontal, and 45° inclination. Stacking sequence
26
obtained, at 45° inclination of banana and kenaf fibre the hybrid composite shows
For flexural test, hybrid composite score 24Mpa strength at 45° inclination
followed by vertical banana and horizontal kenaf orientation (40 banana/50 kenaf
fibre content) which is 21Mpa. The overall result is shown in Table 2.14. As can be
seen in Table 2.14, at higher kenaf fibre content, the flexural strength is higher. It is
Table 2.14 Result of flexural strength and energy absorbed at different fibre
orientation
For impact test, maximum energy absorbed of hybrid composite was at 45°
which is 15.81J. Combination of high kenaf content and glass fibre on top of the
specimen resulted in good strength and high energy absorption than other fibre
orientation.
35
Sharba et al. (2015) investigate the effect of varying fibre orientation on flexural
unsaturated polyester. They used three types of fibre orientation which are
unidirectional twisted yarn, non-woven random mat and plain woven kenaf.
27
They found out that flexural properties of hybrid kenaf/glass are depends on
fibre orientation. From the result obtained, woven kenaf hybrid composite scored the
highest flexural strength and modulus which approximately 295.0 MPa and 210.0
GPa respectively. Unidirectional kenaf hybrid scored the second highest followed by
They also stated that the flexural properties showed a non-linear behaviour
that can be divided into three stages. First stage was linear and gave modulus with
fibre. Second stage is related to failure of kenaf fibre due to low elongation value.
This cause load fell to a specific value than rose up for a short period. At last stage,
the remaining glass fibre which started to carry load but could only do so for short
interfacial bonding of nanofillers with polymer matrix. 37 38 The effect of having poor
28
dispersion of nanofillers is lead to premature failure of nanocomposite system. In
addition, having weak bonding between nanofillers and polymer matrix will cause
40
Sapiai et al. (2015) .In this study, the weight percentage of carbon nanotubes
(CNTs) is varied from 0.5wt-% to 1.0wt-%. The CNTs were added into epoxy resin
Figure 2.7, as the CNT content increase the flexural strength of composites
with increasing of CNT content due to high stiffness of CNT which gives good
29
Figure 2.7 Result of Flexural properties 40
Dimitrios et al. (2014).41 In this research, nanofillers used are silver, Ag, silica
(Si𝑂2 ), multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) and graphene oxide (GO). This
30
PBSu with GO PBSu with MWCNT
It clearly shown from Figure 2.8, Si𝑂2 and Ag show little agglomeration on
the composite while GO and MWCNTs have big agglomerates in the matrix. This
indicates that both Ag and Si𝑂2 are well dispersed in the matrix. Other factor of filler
dispersion is the shape. Spherical shapes of Ag and Si𝑂2 were dispersed more
Zhou et al. (2007) 42 reported mechanical properties of epoxy by filling with carbon
nanotube (CNT). The weight percent of carbon nanotube was varied from 0.1% to
0.4%. The result for flexural test is in Table 2.15. From Table 2.15, the flexural
modulus continued increasing as the weight percent of CNT increase. However, for
strength is caused by two factors. Firstly, the dispersion of CNT filler is not uniform
in the epoxy at higher loading systems. Secondly, presence of voids in the system
also affected the flexural strength. More voids caused decreasing in strength.
31
Table 2.15 Flexural result with and without CNT filer
43
Teh et al. (2006) study the properties of epoxy resin coated with silica fillers
composite. The volume percent of silica was varied from 80% to 95% volume. The
result shows that flexural properties increase in the presence of silica compared to
For flexural strength, the best value is at 80% volume of silica and increasing
insufficient to coat with the silica fillers at higher volume. Consequently, it resulted
in poor interfacial properties and presence of high void content which reduces the
flexural strength. Figure 2.9 shows the image under scanning electron microscope
(SEM) of 80% volume and 95% volume. It clearly showed in Figure 2.9 a)
homogenous dispersion of silica filler in the epoxy. At 95% volume in Figure 2.9 b),
the image shows the epoxy is insufficient to coat silica filler which gives weak filler-
32
(a) (b)
Figure 2.9 SEM images of epoxy coated with silica at (a) 80% vol. silica (b) 95%
vol. silica 43
44
Tay et al. (2012) reported effect of addition of montmorillonite filler of flexural
effect of using compatibilizer which is Epolene E-43P toward flexural and impact
properties. They used two ranges of kenaf sizes which are 250-500μm and 53-150μm
noted as 250μm and 53μm respectively. As expected, for flexural test combination of
compatibilizer E-43P with montmoriilonite (MMT) filler show higher results than
without E-43P.
size of 53μm shows the highest strength than 250μm size and neat polypropylene. It
is because smaller filler size which is 53μm kenaf and MMT resulted in more
matrix to filler. For flexural modulus, composite with MMT and E-43P shows
increase in value.
For impact strength neat polypropylene (with and without E-43P) shows the
highest value than composite with MMT and E-43P. This is because, kenaf has non
uniform shapes and sizes which is unable to efficiently absorbing stress transferred
from matrix. When compare sample with kenaf/PP/MMT, sample with E-43P
33
resulted in higher impact strength. This indicates an enhanced in compatibility and
45
Alsagayar et al. (2014) study the effect of montmorillonite (MMT) nanoclay filler
on flexural properties of its nanocomposite. They used epoxy resin as the matrix. The
MMT filler loading was varied starting from 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 phr. The result
stated that the optimum amount of MMT filler was at 1 phr. The flexural properties
of MMT/epoxy nanocomposite was slightly increased when the filler is add up until
Mpa at 1 phr. After 1 phr loading, the flexural strength and modulus decrease. This is
adding more filler in the epoxy matrix, the viscosity of the nanocomposite increased
and probably increases the creation of air-traps and micro voids. These defects can
lead to increase in stress concentration during test and led to early failure of the
specimens.
46
Glaskova et al (2009) investigate the effect of adding nanoclay filler on water
absorption of epoxy nanocomposite. They stated that epoxy resin has major
drawback of high moisture absorption which can degrades the functional, structural
nanoparticles can minimize the negative effects of water uptake such as reduces the
34
elastic characteristics of hydrophilic polymers. Lesser water uptake resulted in low
approximately half of diffusivity than pure epoxy resin. Clay nanoparticles in the
47
Ozsoy et al. (2015) investigate the effect of micro and nanofiller size toward
mechanical properties of epoxy composite. The micro filler that they used are
aluminium oxide (𝐴𝑙2 𝑂3 ), titanium oxide (Ti𝑂2 ) and fly ash varied from 10% to 30%
weight ratio. While the nanofiller used are aluminium oxide (𝐴𝑙2 𝑂3 ), titanium oxide
They stated that nano-filler size gives good mechanical properties than micro-
filler size. For both sizes, at higher filler content agglomerations occur and decrease
to 5 %wt content and show decreasing in value above 5% content. The decrease in
point because increase in filler content will increased the rigidity and stiffness
35
48
Loos et al (2008) investigate the effect of short wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT)
addition on mechanical properties of epoxy matrix with the use of acetone to increase
diffusion of SWCNT in the solution and reduce resin viscosity. They stated that
small addition of nanotube in epoxy leads to slight structural changes. Flexural and
impact test was carried on in this research. From the result obtained, in 0.1%
SWCNTs addition the flexural properties show a bit decrease in value compared to
pure epoxy. But, flexural properties show an improvement at 0.25% SWCNT. From
properties. This is because from SEM analysis, nanotube is easily pulled out during
From impact test, it shows decrease in impact value for both 0.1% and 0.25%
SWCNT. This is due to nano-inclusion occurred when the epoxy become excessively
viscous and also poor interaction between nanotube and epoxy. The overall result is
in Table 2.17.
Deepak et al. (2015) 49 study the influence of nanoclay in polyester resin reinforced
coir fibres. They compare coir composite with and without nanoclay. The nanoclay
used is fixed at 3%-wt. Impact test had been conducted and it is proven that energy
absorbed increase with the addition of nanoclay. The energy absorbed for coir
36
composite without nanoclay was 1.5J while coir composite with nanoclay was 2J. By
adding nanoclay, some reinforcement is added to the fibres. The storage modulus
increase in the composite is due to the reinforcement produce by the fibres which
allowed greater stress transfers at the interface. That is why energy absorbed increase
50
Karippal et al. (2011) had done the research on mechanical properties of
epoxy/glass/nanoclay hybrid composites. They varied the nanoclay filler from 1-wt%
to 6-wt%. From the result obtained the mechanical properties of hybrid composite
show an improvement up until 5-wt% and decreased at 6-wt%. Figure 2.10 shows the
graph of flexural strength and modulus. From the graph, the maximum performance
nanoclay-resin and the glass fibre which is stronger than at 2-wt% and 3-wt%. Well
poor interaction between resin and nanoclay filler. Furthermore, there was also fibre
pull out of 6-wt% composite which is caused by high viscosity of resin that
37
Figure 2.10 Graph of Flexural result 50
51
Sivasaravanan and Bupesh Raja (2014) investigated the impact properties of
varied nanoclay from 1-wt% to 5-wt%. The result showed the maximum impact
impact strength also shows an increased. The average value of impact strength at 5-
wt% was 10.75J/m which is the best combination among others followed by 4-wt%
52
Kushwaha et al. (2014) compare the mechanical properties of bamboo fibre with
epoxy modified carbon nanotube (BECN) and treated bamboo fibre/epoxy composite
(BTEc). They investigate flexural properties, impact properties and water absorption
38
test. Generally, composite with carbon nanotube showed greater performance than
treated bamboo composite. For flexural test, the flexural strength for BECN and
BETc are 163Mpa and 154Mpa respectively. From the discussion, they found that
untreated bamboo has weak interfacial adhesion between matrix epoxy so that the
composite cannot withstand applied load transferred from the epoxy. From that, the
For flexural modulus, BECN got 12420 Mpa while BETc got 9500 Mpa.
Factors that attribute to the higher moduli of BECN are good dispersion of CNT and
For impact test, BECN has higher impact strength than BETc which is 84.5%
higher. This is due to better interlocking between fibres and matrix aided by CNT.
For water absorption test, for both composite, the weight gain decrease which is
53
Wulan et al (2014) investigated the effect of adding carbon nanotube (CNT)
towards mechanical properties of fruit bunch palm oil. The fruit bunch palm oil
contained cellulose fibre which is well-known natural fibre. From the result obtained,
addition of CNT affects the flexural properties of fibre of fruit bunch palm oil with
epoxy matrix composite. They varied CNT by weight percentage of 0.1, 0.5 and 1%.
The optimum performance of flexural properties of the composite was at 1%-wt. The
flexural strength of composite at 0.1, 0.5 and 1%-wt increased by 51.64%, 65.8% and
39
cracks propagation by CNT that can lead to failure. Besides, due to nano size of
CNT, it can easily fill the gaps between matrix and fibre.
54
Islam et al (2015) studied the effect of fibre mixing and addition of clay toward
water uptake properties. They fabricate the sample at ratio 70:30 which is 70% resin
and 30% fibre. They differentiate their sample by vary fibre composition of wood to
coir fibre 0/30%, 30/0% and 15/15% with and without clay filler. The matrix used is
polypropylene (PP).
shows the highest water uptake. This is due to numerous number of –OH groups that
present in the coir fibre. In addition in the 0/30% composite, there are increased in
micro-voids which enhance the amount of water uptake. For composite of 15/15%
well. Hybrid composite (15/15%) without MMT has the lowest water uptake because
coir composition is decrease which also indicates the hydroxyl group is lesser and no
MMT addition.
Shen et al (2014) 55 investigate the effect of carbon nanotube addition toward flexural
properties of ramie/epoxy composite. They varied carbon nanotube content from 0.1-
wt% to 0.6-wt%. From the stress-strain curve, the failure strain increase at increasing
nantube content will not increase the failure strain due to stiffening effect of
40
strength of the composite which is as a function of modulus matrix. Basically, the
strength comes from ultra high strength and modulus of nanotube itself. Presence of
nanotube will strengthen and stiffened of fibre and the matrix thus makes it more
41
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Materials
The main materials used in this study were woven kenaf fibre with density of
1.44 g/cm³, E-600 glass fibre and epoxy resin with density of 1.1 g/cm³. For the
nanofillers, the fillers used are nanoclay and carbon nanotubes. The weight
percentage of nanofillers is varied from 1wt-%, 3wt-%, 5wt-%, and 7wt-%. Table
42
Table 2.18 Density of materials
Material Density (g/cm³)
Epoxy (100A:28.4B) 1.10
Slow hardener (103) 1.10
Kenaf (Bangladesh) 1.44
Glass (E-800) 2.50
Silicone filler 1.00
Carbon nanotube 2.10
Nanoclay 200-500 kg/m³ (bulk density)
and kenaf/glass/epoxy with nanofillers. Total specimens in this experiment are ten
a. Firstly, the woven kenaf and glass fibres are cut for 300x300mm dimension.
After that, the weight of the woven kenaf and glass fibres are measured. From
that weight, we can calculate the needed weight for resin based on decided
b. To get resin solution, the epoxy and hardener are mixed. Stir slowly until the
solution is fully mixed. Then nanofiller are added into the resin solution.
43
c. Next, wax is applied on the needed surface for specimen layup. Leave the
d. The first layer of glass fibre is placed on the wax surface. Resin solution is
applied on top of it. Make sure that the entire layer is fully applied with resin.
e. Then, the next 2 plies woven kenaf layer is placed on top of first layer. Step
(c) and (d) are repeated with the last layer of glass fibre. There are seven plies
f. After finish the layup process, a plate is placed on top of the sample. The
sample is then put into a 40 tonne compression molding with 5 minutes pre-
g. Next, every sample is cut according to ASTM standard for flexural, impact
and water absorption test. Then these entire tests are conducted and the
Flexural test is carried out according to ASTM D790 with sample dimension
From flexural test, there are two mechanical properties are obtained which are
44
3.4 Impact test
Impact test is carried out according to ASTM 7136 with sample dimension of
Water absorption test is carried out according to ASTM 570 with sample
Where 𝑤𝑓 is the weight of sample after immersed in water for several time.
45
3.6 Morphology observation
is to observe sample behaviour after carried out flexural test. Some criteria that need
filler in matrix.
46
CHAPTER 4
RESULT
2000
1404.59
1726.69 1575.53
1800
1541.59
1600 1380.10 1496.42 1399.51
1275.97
Flexural strength (MPa)
1400
1200 1159.45
591.74
1000
800 558.40
600
400
200
0
E E-S S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9
Sample
Figure 4.1 Effects of adding nanoclay or carbon nanotubes on the flexural strength of
kenaf/glass/epoxy composite
47
140
103.56 124.41
120 104.24
94.43 99.33
60 52.09
32.73
40
15.58
20
0
E E-S S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9
Sample
Figure 4.2 Effects of adding nanoclay or carbon nanotubes on the flexural modulus
of kenaf/glass/epoxy composite
nanofiller. From Figure 4.1 the flexural strength increase up to 3-wt% filler and show
decreasing in value when further adding the filler content. Increasing in strength is
due to good interfacial adhesion between fibre and matrix (Kushwaha et al. 2014).
wt% filler, flexural strength decrease because of insufficient of epoxy to coat with
Figure 4.2 shows the flexural modulus that gives same trend as flexural
strength. Increase in filler content will increase the rigidity and stiffness of the
For nanoclay sample which is from S2 to S5, sample S3 showed the highest flexural
strength and modulus that is 1726.69MPa and 124.41GPa respectively. S3 gives 23%
48
and 20% improvement of strength and modulus respectively when compared to S1.
strength and 99.33GPa modulus. This can be proven by SEM observation in Figure
4.3 and Figure 4.4. Figure 4.3 shows good adhesion between fibre and matrix (with
clay) while Figure 4.4 shows poor adhesion. Furthermore, as can be seen in Figure
4.3 there is also clay agglomeration in the matrix but not significant.
Treated clay gives better interfacial adhesion with the matrix which resulted in good
49
For flexural strain, S4 and S8 show the highest strain which is 5-wt% of
nanoclay and carbon nanotube respectively. By increasing the filler content, the
flexural strain will increase up to certain limit. This is due to stiffening effect of the
filler itself (Ozsoy et al 2015). As can be seen in Figure 4.5, the epoxy modified
silicone sample show an improvement than neat epoxy. The cross-linked silicone
core gives an additional strength to the matrix and stiffens the matrix. Figure 4.5
25
17.17
20
Flexural Strain (%)
15
11.93
10.07 8.27
9.4 8.17
9.0
10
6.67 6.53
5.3 5.5
5
0
E E-S S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9
Sample
Figure 4.5 Effects of adding nanoclay or carbon nanotubes on the flexural strain of
kenaf/glass/epoxy composite
50
4.2 Impact test
20
18 17.06 15.92
15.89 15.96
16 14.76
13.41 13.91 13.08
14
Energy Absorption (J)
12.36
12
9.54
10
8
6
4
0.92
2
0
-2 E E-S S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9
Sample
Figure 4.6 Effects of adding nanoclay or carbon nanotubes on the energy absorption
of kenaf/glass/epoxy composite
wt% filler. 3-wt% nanoclay composite (S3) exhibit the highest energy absorption
improvement of energy absorption while S7 gives 12% lesser energy absorption than
S1. At filler content above 3-wt% energy absorption decrease which is because of
gives significant higher energy absorption than neat epoxy. This is due to the high
brittleness of epoxy than ES composite that resulted in low energy absorption. With
the addition of silicone to the matrix epoxy, some reinforcement is added to the resin
system. The silicone filler act as a good binder between matrix and matrix bonding
51
Table 2.20 shows the overall damage area for sample S1 to S9. As can be
seen, the variation of damage area for nanoclay sample show different trend from
S2 1455 S6 390
S4 367 S8 419
S5 953 S9 297
absorption and small damage area. It is different for carbon nanotube sample where
the highest energy absorption which is S7 but has bigger damage area. This is
because carbon nanotube filler used in this project is not modified and gives low
compatibilizer, can lead to a bad dispersion and lead to filler agglomeration which
Ye L. et al 2004 58). But at the addition of filler in composite the energy dispersion or
the fibre itself. This reinforcement gives higher storage modulus that allows greater
52
transfer of stress at between fibre and matrix (Deepak et al 2015). The energy
absorption of S3 and S7 are higher with interlocking structure of woven kenaf and
glass fibre that require more energy to break the coupling between the fibre bundles.
12 S1
10 S2
8 S3
6 S4
4 S5
2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Day
53
water absorption of CNT filler
12
8
S6
6 S7
S8
4
S9
2 S1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Day
Figure 4.8 Water absorption result of kenaf/glass/epoxy composite filled with carbon
nanotube
Based on Figure 4.7 there was a rapid water uptake at the first three days. For
sample with nanoclay, S4 gives the highest water uptake which is 9% more at the
compared to S1 followed by S3, S2 and S5. As can be seen in Figure 4.8 which is
sample with carbon nanotube filler, S8 gives the highest water uptake among sample
with nanotube filler but, S8 show lesser water uptake compared to S1 which is 1.0%
less. Highest water uptake of sample with nanoclay is might related increase in
al. 2015). Increase in hydrophilic nature will increase the water uptake.
In addition, all samples shows higher water uptake compared to neat epoxy
also increase the hydrophilic nature that contribute to more water uptake. Besides, as
can be seen in Figure 4.9 that modified epoxy-silicone gives a bit higher water
54
uptake compared to neat epoxy. From the Figure 4.9 at the first three days, modified
0.8
E-S
0.6
E
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Day
When compared all hybrid kenaf/glass composite, sample with nanoclay and
carbon nanotube filler show lower water uptake than S1. This is because addition of
nature and increase water uptake. An agglomeration of filler and presence of voids
will also lead to high water uptake. An illustration of presence of filler agglomeration
55
CHAPTER 5
For this study, flexural and impact properties were the main concerns with water
absorption behaviour as a test to identify which sample gives highest water uptake. For
flexural test, S3 gives the highest flexural strength and flexural modulus. The reason of
highest strength is due to good interfacial adhesion between fibre and matrix. Another
possible reason that leads to good flexural strength is well dispersion of filler in the matrix.
Besides, factor that contributes in good flexural modulus is increase in rigidity and stiffness
of the polymer which is due to the presence of filler. After flexural test, a morphology
observation is to study the surface of the composite and identify possible factors of flexural
performance. Sample S3 and S7 were chosen to be investigated under SEM. It is proven that
S3 gives good interfacial adhesion between fibre and matrix while S7 gives poor adhesion.
As mentioned in the discussion part, carbon nanotube is not treated filler and it gives poor
adhesion between fibre and matrix. More images of SEM result are attached in Appendix B.
For impact test, S3 and S7 gives high energy absorption compared to other samples.
The presence of filler in the compoite gives an additional strength that gives higher storage
modulus that allows greater transfer of stress at between fibre and matrix which
resulted in high energy absorption. Furthermore, after impact test is done a non-destructive
test which is dye penetrant test is conducted. The purpose of it is to allow dye to penetrate
the impacted surface for clear observation of damage area. As for damage area, generally if
56
the damage area is bigger there is more energy is being dispersed. But in the inclusion of
filler it restricted the crack propagation and resulted in small area. The pictures of all impact
For water absorption test, it is conducted until all samples show constant weight. At
the first 10 days all samples shows rapid water uptake. After several days, S4 gives the
highest water uptake compared to S1 and other nanoclay sample. While for carbon nanotube
samples, S8 gives the highest water uptake. The addition of nanofiller could minimize water
uptake and decrease hydrophilic nature. But S4 and S8 with 5-wt% nanoclay and 5-wt%
carbon nanotube respectively gives highest water uptake which is due to present of voids and
error in fabrication.
RECOMMENDATIONS
filler, during mixing process student should put the filler in the resin solution evenly
using a filter and avoid put the filler all at once. The reason of using filter is to avoid
foreign objects from entering the resin solution. Furthermore, student can increase
During hand layup process, student should not delay too much time because
as the hardener is mix with the resin, the curing process occurred rapidly and lead to
sometimes could not function well. If full press did not occurred the sample will
resulted in increase in thickness which affected the water absorption test later on.
57
Student should repeat the sample to avoid high error in test results and inconsistent in
reading.
As for impact test, after conducting one impact sample student should left the
drop weight machine for about 7 minutes before continue for other samples. This is a
precaution to avoid instrument error. After one impact sample the machine still has
residual effect and to avoid this residual effect affect the result for next sample,
58
REFERENCE
1
Saheb DN, Jog JP. Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol
1999;18(4):351–63.
2
N. S. Gill and B. F. Yousif, “Wear and frictional performance of betelnut fibre-reinforced polyester
composite,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering
Tribology, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 183–194, 2009. ·
3
W. Liu, A. K. Mohanty, P. Askeland, L. T. Drzal, and M. Misra, “Influence of fiber surface
treatment on properties of Indian grass fiber reinforced soy protein based biocomposites,” Polymer,
vol. 45, no. 22, pp. 7589–7596, 2004.
4
F.C Campbell. 2010. Structural Composite Materials. Chapter 1: Introduction to Composite Material
5
S. N. Surip,W. N. R.Wan Jaafar, N. N. Azmi and U. M. K. Anwar:‘Microscopy observation on
nanocellulose from kenaf fibre’, Adv.Mater. Res., 2012, 488–489, 72–75.
6
The advantages of epoxy resin versus polyester in marine composite structures. Retrieved from
http://www.amtcomposites.co.za/sites/default/files/media/howto/Advantages%20of%20Epoxy%20ov
er%20Polyester.pdf
7
Santulli, C., Jeronimidis, G., De Rosa, I. M., & Sarasini, F. (2009). Mechanical and falling weight
impact properties of unidirectional phormium fibre/epoxy laminates. Express Polym Lett, 3(10), 650-
6.
8
Anbukarasi, K., & Kalaiselvam, S. (2015). Study of effect of fibre volume and dimension on
mechanical, thermal, and water absorption behaviour of luffa reinforced epoxy composites. Materials
& Design, 66, 321-330.
9
Venkateshwaran, N., ElayaPerumal, A., Alavudeen, A., & Thiruchitrambalam, M. (2011).
Mechanical and water absorption behaviour of banana/sisal reinforced hybrid composites. Materials
& Design, 32(7), 4017-4021.
10
Behnaz Baghaei, Mikael Skrifvars , Masoud Salehi , Tariq Bashir , Marja Rissanen , Pertti
Nousiainen. 2014. Novel aligned hemp fibre reinforcement for structural biocomposites: Porosity,
water absorption, mechanical performances and viscoelastic behaviour. Part A 61 (2014) 1–12
11
Vivek Mishra, Sandhyarani Biswas. 2013. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bi-directional
Jute Fiber epoxy Composites, Procedia Engineering 51 ( 2013 ) 561 – 566,
doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.079
59
12
Amit Bindal, Satnam Singh, N. K. Batra, Rajesh Khanna. (2013). Development of Glass/Jute
Fibers Reinforced Polyester Composite. Indian Journal of Materials Science Volume 2013, Article ID
675264, 6 pages
13
Osman, E., Vakhguelt, A., Sbarski, I., & Mutasher, S. (2011, August). Water absorption behavior
and its effect on the mechanical properties of kenaf natural fiber unsaturated polyester composites.
In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Composites Materials (ICCM’11).
14
Huner, U. (2015). Effect of Water Absorption on the Mechanical Properties of Flax Fibre
Reinforced Epoxy Composites.
15
Gupta, M. K., Srivastava, R. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, S., & Nahak, B. (2015). Mechanical and Water
Absorption Properties of Hybrid Sisal/Glass Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composite. American Journal of
Polymer Science & Engineering, 3(2), 208-219.
16
Rassiah K, Ahmad MMHM. A review on mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced polymer
composite. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2013;7:247–53.
17
Kwon H-J, Sunthornvarabhas J, Park J-W, Lee J-H, Kim H-J, Piyachomkwan K,
et al. Tensile properties of kenaf fiber and corn husk flour reinforced poly(lactic
acid) hybrid bio-composites: role of aspect ratio of natural fibers. Compos Part B Eng 2014;56:232-
7
18
Paridah MT, Basher AB, SaifulAzry S, Ahmed Z. Retting process of some bast plant fibers and its
effect on fiber quality: a review. Bio Resour 2011;6:5260–81.
19
Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010.
Prog Polym Sci 2012;37:1552–96.
20
Omar Faruk , Andrzej K. Bledzki, Hans-Peter Fink, Mohini Sain. 2000-2010. Biocomposites
reinforced with natural fibers.
21
Alavudeen A., N. Rajini, S. Karthikeyan, M. Thruchitrambalam, N. Venkateshwaren. 2015.
Mechanical properties of banana/kenaf fiber-reinforced hybrid polyester composites: Effect of woven
fabric and random orientation
22
Arifuzzaman Khan G. M. , M.Terano,M.A. Gafur, M.Shamsul Alam.2013. Studies on the
mechanical properties of woven jute fabric reinforced poly (L-lactic acid) composites.
23
Wong, K.J., Nirmal, U. , Lim, B.K., 2010. Impact behaviour of short and continuous fiber-
reinforced polyester composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Comps. 29 (23), 3463-3474.
24
N. H. Bakar, K.M. Hyie, A.F.Mohamed, Z. Salleh, A.Kalam. 2014. Kenaf fibre composites using
thermoset epoxy and polyester polymer resins: energy absorbed versus tensile properties. Vol 18.
25
S. Rassmann, R. Paskaramoorthy, R.G. Reid. (2010). Effect of resin system on the mechanical
properties and water absorption of kenaf fibre reinforced laminates.
26
Naveenkumar R, Sharun V, Dhanasakkaravarthi B, Paul Theophilus Rajakumar I. 2015.
Comparative study on jute and kenaf fibre composite material. Vol 4.
27
Yakubu Dan-mallam, TanWei Hong, and Mohd Shukry AbdulMajid. 2015. Behaviour of
Interwoven Kenaf/PET Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composite.
28
Abu bakar, M.A., Ahmad, S. , Kuntjoro, W. .2011. Effect of epoxidized natural rubber on
mechanical properties of epoxy reinforced kenaf fibre composites.
60
29
Bindal, A., Singh, S., Batra, N. K., & Khanna, R. (2013). Development of glass/jute fibers
reinforced polyester composite. Indian Journal of Materials Science, 2013.
30
Davoodi, M. M., Sapuan, S. M., Ahmad, D., Aidy, A., Khalina, A., & Jonoobi, M. (2012). Effect of
polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) on impact property improvement of hybrid kenaf/glass epoxy
composite. Materials Letters, 67(1), 5-7.
31
Atiqah, M.A. Maleque, M. Jawaid, M. Iqbal . (2012). Development of kenaf-glass reinforced
unsaturated polyester hybrid composite for structural applications. Composites: Part B 56 (2014) 68–
73
32
Muhammad, Y. H., Ahmad, S., Bakar, M. A. A., Mamun, A. A., & Heim, H. P. (2015). Mechanical
properties of hybrid glass/kenaf fibre-reinforced epoxy composite with matrix modification using
liquid epoxidised natural rubber.Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 34(11), 896-906.
33
Salleh, Z., Taib, Y. M., Hyie, K. M., Mihat, M., Berhan, M. N., & Ghani, M. A. A. (2012). Fracture
toughness investigation on long kenaf/woven glass hybrid composite due to water absorption
effect. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1667-1673.
34
Sathish, P., Kesavan, R., Ramnath, B. V., & Vishal, C. (2015). Effect of Fiber Orientation and
Stacking Sequence on Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of Banana-Kenaf Hybrid Epoxy
Composite. Silicon, 1-9.
35
Sharba, M. J., Leman, Z., Sultan, M. T., Ishak, M. R., & Hanim, M. A. A. (2015). Effects of kenaf
fiber orientation on mechanical properties and fatigue life of glass/kenaf hybrid
composites. BioResources, 11(1), 1448-1465.
36
Njuguna, J.; Pielichowski, K.; Desai, S. Nanofiller-reinforced polymer nanocomposites.Polym. Adv.
Technol. 2008, 19, 947–959.
37
Jumahat, A., Soutis, C., Mahmud, J. and Ahmad, N. 2012. Compressive Properties of
Nanoclay/Epoxy Nanocomposites. Procedia Eng. 41: 1607–1613.
38
Zare, Y. 2015. Effects of interphase on tensile strength of polymer/CNT nanocomposites by Kelly–
Tyson theory. Mech. Mater. 85: 1–6.
39
Schadler, L.S.; Brinson, L.C.; Sawyer, W.G. Polymer nanocomposites: A small part of the story.
JOM 2007, 59, 53–60.
40
Sapiai, N., Jumahat, A., & Mahmud, J. (2015). Flexural And Tensile Properties Of Kenaf/Glass
Fibres Hybrid Composites Filled With Carbon Nanotubes. Jurnal Teknologi, 76(3).
41
Dimitrios G. Papageorgiou, Konstantinos Chrisssafis, Eleni Pavlidou, Eleni A. Deliyanni, Geroge
Z. Papagoergiou, Zoi Terzopoulou, Dimitrios N. Bikiaris. 2014. Effect of nanofiller’s size and shape
on the solid state microstructure and thermal properties of poly( butylenes succinate) nanocomposites.
42
Zhou, Y. X., Wu, P. X., Cheng, Z. Y., Ingram, J., & Jeelani, S. (2008). Improvement in electrical,
thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy by filling carbon nanotube. Express polymer letters, 2(1),
40-48.
43
Teh, P. L., Mariatti, M., Akil, H. M., Yeoh, C. K., Seetharamu, K. N., Wagiman, A. N. R., & Beh,
K. S. (2007). The properties of epoxy resin coated silica fillers composites. Materials Letters, 61(11),
2156-2158.
61
44
Tay, G. S., Azniwati, A. A., Azizah, A. B., Rozman, H. D., & Musa, L. (2012). The flexural and
impact properties of kenaf-polypropylene composites filled with montmorillonite filler. Polymer-
Plastics Technology and Engineering, 51(2), 208-213.
45
Alsagayar, Z. S., Rahmat, A. R., & Arsad, A. (2015, July). Tensile and Flexural Properties of
Montmorillonite Nanoclay Reinforced Epoxy Resin Composites. In Advanced Materials
Research (Vol. 1112, pp. 373-376).
46
Glaskova, Т., & Aniskevich, A. (2009). Moisture absorption by epoxy/montmorillonite
nanocomposite. Composites Science and Technology,69(15), 2711-2715.
47 Ozsoy, İ., Demirkol, A., Mimaroglu, A., Unal, H., & Demir, Z. (2015). The Influence of Micro-
and Nano-Filler Content on the Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composites. Strojniški vestnik-
Journal of Mechanical Engineering,61(10), 601-609.
48
Loos, M. R., Coelho, L. A. F., Pezzin, S. H., & Amico, S. C. (2008). Effect of carbon nanotubes
addition on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy matrices. Materials Research, 11(3), 347-
352.
49
Deepak, K., Reddy, N. S., & Naidu, T. S. (2015). Thermosetting Polymer and Nano Clay Based
Natural Fiber Bio-Composites. Procedia Materials Science, 10, 626-631.
50
Karippal, J. J., Murthy, H. N., Rai, K. S., Sreejith, M., & Krishna, M. (2011). Study of mechanical
properties of epoxy/glass/nanoclay hybrid composites.Journal of Composite Materials, 45(18), 1893-
1899.
51
Sivasaravanan S.,Bupesh Raja V.K.(2014). Impact Properties of Epoxy/Glass fibre/Nanoclay
Composite Material. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e- ISSN:
2278-1684, p-ISSN : 2320–334X PP 39-41
52
Kushwaha, P. K., Pandey, C. N., & Kumar, R. (2014). Study on the effect of carbon nanotubes on
plastic composite reinforced with natural fiber. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood
Science, 11(1), 82-86.
53
Wulan, P. P., Saputra, A. H., & Purwanto, W. W. Mechanical Reinforcements Of Composites Made
From Fiber Of Fruit Bunch Palm Oil By Adding Carbon Nanotube.
54
Islam M. S., Mansor B. Ahmad, Mahbub Hasan, Sidek Abdul Aziz, Mohammad Jawaid, M.K.
Mohamad Haafiz, Siti A.H. Zakaria. (2015). Natural fiber-reinforced hybrid polymer nanocomposites
: Effect of fiber mixing and nanoclay on physical, mechanical, and biodegradable properties. “Hybrid
nanocomposites, “ BioResources 10(1), 1394-1407.
55
Shen, X., Jia, J., Chen, C., Li, Y., & Kim, J. K. (2014). Enhancement of mechanical properties of
natural fiber composites via carbon nanotube addition. Journal of materials science, 49(8), 3225-
3233.
56
Zoukrami, F., Haddaoui, N., Vanzeveren, C., Sclavons, M. and Devaux, J. (2008), "Effect of
compatibilizer on the dispersion of untreated silica in a polypropylene matrix", Polymer International,
vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 756-763.
57
Hawa, A., Majid, M. A., Afendi, M., Marzuki, H. F. A., Amin, N. A. M., Mat, F., & Gibson, A. G.
(2016). Burst strength and impact behaviour of hydrothermally aged glass fibre/epoxy composite
pipes. Materials & Design,89, 455-464.
62
58
Ye L. et al.(2004).’Performnace of 3D interlock Textile Polymer’. Composites Technologies for
2020: Proceedings of the Fourth Asian-Australasian Conference on Composite Materials (ACCM-4) :
University of Sydney, Australia, 6-9 July 2004. Pg 490-493
63