Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.nubeesystem.com
SECTION – 2
Company Confidential
68 © PT. Nubee System
Abbreviations
Company Confidential
69 © PT. Nubee System Page 69
BSC6810 Cabinets
Item Specification
Outline 2200˄H˅h600
dimensioning (mm) ˄W˅h800˄D˅
Height of the
46U
available space
Weight 140~350kg
42,000
51,000
Company Confidential
72 © PT. Nubee System
Page72
BTS3900 Appearance
Type Parameters
Dimensions 600(W)*900(H)*450(D)
Company Confidential
73 © PT. Nubee System Page 73
BTS3900 Single Cabinet Full Configuration Structure
1U
9U
19U
2U
1U
1U
2U
1U
2U
3U
Company Confidential
75 © PT. Nubee System Page 75
DBS3900 Overview
Feeder
grounding
-48V DC cable
Power cable RF jumper
power
BBU3900
-48V/ 24V
DC power Grounding
Power cable cable
Company Confidential
76 © PT. Nubee System Page 76
DBS3900 Capacity and Characteristics
Company Confidential
77 © PT. Nubee System Page 77
DBS3900 Capacity and Characteristics
Company Confidential
78 © PT. Nubee System Page 78
BTS3900 Capacity and Characteristics
l Characteristics
Company Confidential
79 © PT. Nubee System Page 79
OUTLINE 80
Company Confidential
80 © PT. Nubee System
Huawei 3G Optimization Tools
Performance/alarms
/configurations/
iManagerTM M2000
engineering para.
Capture test data
GENEX
Nastar
Analysis Result
sharing
Node
Nod eB
Node B
RNC
GMSC/SSP
GENEX CN
Node B
Probe
Node BRNS
Company Confidential
81 © PT. Nubee System
OUTLINE 82
Company Confidential
82 © PT. Nubee System
RNC_A-Retainability
Due to PS IRATHO
degraded after
SGSN rehoming
Company Confidential
83 © PT. Nubee System Page 83
RNC_A-Mobility
ISHO problem solved
after MSC LAC
reconfiguration
Company Confidential
84 © PT. Nubee System Page 84
RNC_A-Traffic
Company Confidential
85 © PT. Nubee System Page 85
ISHO CS Degradation Since 17 Dec 09
Company Confidential
86 © PT. Nubee System Page 86
OUTLINE 87
Company Confidential
87 © PT. Nubee System
RNC & Node B Counters
Company Confidential
88 © PT. Nubee System Page 88
Nubee Training Center (NTC)
www.nubeesystem.com
SECTION – 3
Company Confidential
91 © PT. Nubee System Page 91
Case 1. Analyzing Pilot Pollution Problem
Pilot Pollution analysis based on scanner data
2. Locate Pilot Pollution area
Pilot Pollution happens near the bridge. Multiple strong
pilots include:
• signals on the thither side of the bridge
• ssignals
ignals along
along with
with the treet
the sstreet
Company Confidential
92 © PT. Nubee System Page 92
Case 1. Analyzing Pilot Pollution Problem
Pilot Pollution analysis based on scanner data
3. Confirm the cells causing Pilot Pollution
• SC224 (available signals on the thither side of the bridge)
• SC50, SC176/SC178, SC170 (overshooting on the thither side of the bridge)
• SC26 (overshooting along with the street)
• SC1 (available signals)
4. Solutions
Antenna down tilt adjustment
• Reduce antenna down tilt to increase cell coverage
range on the thither side of the bridge. e.g. SC224.
• Increase antenna down tilt to reduce coverage range
on the thither side of the bridge. e.g. SC170 and
SC176/SC178.
• Increase antenna down tilt to reduce coverage range
along with the street, e.g. SC26.
Company Confidential
94 © PT. Nubee System Page 94
Case 2. Call Drop due to weak Coverage
Weak coverage
Company Confidential
95 © PT. Nubee System Page 95
Case 2. Call Drop due to weak Coverage
Weak coverage
3. Analysis
The distance from call drop point to SC212 (nearest working cell in Active
Set) is 2078m, and the azimuth of SC212 is reverse to call drop area. There
is a much nearer cell SC190, but it seems not to work.
4. Solution
Company Confidential
96 © PT. Nubee System Page 96
OUTLINE 97
Company Confidential
99 © PT. Nubee System Page 99
KPI Analysis: Inter-RAT HO SR
Company Confidential
101 © PT. Nubee System Page 101
Sample Case for Inter RAT HO
Company Confidential
102 © PT. Nubee System Page 102
Cause/Analysis
Company Confidential
103 © PT. Nubee System Page 103
Cause/Analysis
Company Confidential
104 © PT. Nubee System Page 104
Handling Problem
• 1. GSM Neighbor Relationship: Check whether correct GSM Cell
neighbor relationshop is defined correctly where 3G and 2G sites
location should be at the same area. Since it is swap project, pre-
swap dump is the source of reference to define the GSM cell. Check
from Map info and pre-swap dump for the verification.
• 2. GSM information: Cross check every single possible parameter
that might make mistake in command ADD GSMCELL, ADD
GSMNCELL
• 3. Switches Setting: Check Switches Setting in RNC by using
command LST CORRMALGOSWITCH. There are 6 subclusters in this
RNC, only 1 out of 6 Subcluster faced InterRAT Preparation 100%
failure problem. Thus, RNC Level Switches setting should not be the
root cause of the problem.
Company Confidential
105 © PT. Nubee System Page 105
Handling Problem
• In this case, the root cause is due to MSC that connect to GSM
BSS have not define new swapped Huawei RNC and cell on
time. Thus, the Relocation Preparation failure due to no reply
from MSC that connects to GSM BSS equipment.
Company Confidential
106 © PT. Nubee System Page 106
OUTLINE 107
Analysis:
1. The Interactive Service Class was requested by User on 04:31:03
2. The SIM Card profile is 8.64 Mbps for DL and 4.032 Mbps for UL.
3. The PDP Context Accepted 04:31:04
Company Confidential
108 © PT. Nubee System Page 108
Analysis by Tracing
Company Confidential
109 © PT. Nubee System Page 109
Sample Case Analysis by Tracing (Inter RAT Relocation Preparation Failure )
Company Confidential
110 © PT. Nubee System Page 110
Sample Case Analysis by Tracing ( RRC Connection Drop )
Company Confidential
111 © PT. Nubee System Page 111
Sample Case Analysis by Tracing ( Inter RNC HO )
Company Confidential
112 © PT. Nubee System Page 112
Sample Case Analysis by Tracing ( Inter RNC HO )
Company Confidential
113 © PT. Nubee System Page 113
Sample Case Analysis by Tracing ( Low Throughput)
Company Confidential
114 © PT. Nubee System Page 114
Sample Case Analysis CS Inter RAT HO Attempt 0%
Below is Huawei RNC600 at Country I on the IRATHO attempt statistics from 1st
September 2008 to 23rd September 2008.
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00% IRAT HO Success Rate (%)
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
200 8 00 8 00 8 00 8 00 8 0 08 0 08 0 08 0 08 0 08 0 08 0 08
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
9/ 1/ /3/ /5/ /7/ /9/ 11/ 13/ 15/ 17/ 19/ 21/ 23/
9 9 9 9 9/ 9/ 9/ 9/ 9/ 9/ 9/
Company Confidential
115 © PT. Nubee System Page 115
Sample Case Analysis CS Inter RAT HO Attempt 0%
From the DT analysis, it shows that the compressed mode where Event 2D has triggered as shown in L3
signaling message in Figure 1 and Figure 2 when it reaches RSCP threshold which is -95dBm.
After UE has sent the MEASUREMENT REPORT to start compressed mode to the RNC600, a
MEASUREMENT CONTROL message is received from the RNC600 to report to UE the details of
INTERRAT neighbours as shown in Figure 3.
To further investigate the root cause of this no INTERRAT handover attempt, RNC performance data on
22/9/2008 1130~1230 is extracted and analyzed using Huawei Genex Nastar WCDMA network analyzing
tools and it shows that there is RELOCATION REQUIRED message sent from RNC600 to the CN with the
counter VS.SRELOC.AttPrep.IRHOCS; showing 2753 times of RELOCATION REQUIRED messages sent
to CN as shown in Figure 6. However, the RNC600 received 2752 times of RELOCATION PREPARATION
FAILURE from the CN with the counter VS.SRELOC.FailPrep.IRATCSOut.
Company Confidential
118 © PT. Nubee System Page 118
Sample Case Analysis CS Inter RAT HO Attempt 0%
%
The CN signaling collection was performed on 2008-10-17 from 16:00 to 17:00.
The root cause from RNC tracing is that Semantic error which indicates that the 2G cell information,
such as CGI, BCCH, LAC, and etc may be incorrectly set in MSC.
Company Confidential
119 © PT. Nubee System Page 119
Summary
UMTS Network
Optimization
Company Confidential
120 © PT. Nubee System