Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Kenya and Uganda Sessions September 2010

Feedback sessions - 14 and 16 September 2010

This report is solely for the use of the Excelsior Firm and client personnel. No part of it may be
circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution without prior written approval from Excelsior
Firm.

DRAFT – page
slide00
Purpose of this document

• Summarize findings from Kenya and


Uganda feedback sessions
Note:
Note:
• Share early findings with stakeholders ••These
Theseare
areearly
earlyfindings
findings
••Additional
Additional inputswill
inputs willbe
be
• Solicit feedback on early findings incorporated
incorporatedbefore
beforefinalizing
finalizingthe
the
proposed interventions
proposed interventions
• Stimulate discussion on how best to
support East African ICT
entrepreneurs

slide 1
Attendee profile: Kenya and Uganda sessions
Total attendance Experience within ICT industry

83% Number of surveyed participants


40
33 response 4
0-2 years
rate
2-5 years 7

5-10 years 12
10-20 years 4
20+ years 4
Attendance Surveyed N/A 2
(3 sessions) participants

Type of ICT services provided Company size

Annual
Number of surveyed participants
revenues, USD Number of surveyed
Software 17 thousands participants
Content 15 11
0-50
Mobile 14 2
50-100
Security 12 6
100-500
Network 10 1
500 – 5,000
Respondents could select more than one category; other categories selected: 5,000+ 3
Non-technical (6), Data Centers (6), BPO/Call Centers (6), Other (5), Hardware
(3) N/a or non-profit 10

Dates 14 and 16 September 2010 Lead Javier Ewing (Excelsior) Ory Okolloh (Excelsior)
Location Nairobi, iHub; Moderators
Kampala, Hive CoLab
Time 3 sessions: Additional Victor Gathara (UKaid) Tim Kelly (infoDev)
- Kenya, 10am and 2pm Moderators/ Lauren Rawlings (Excelsior) Lucy Mbaye (Excelsior)
- Uganda, 2pm Participants

slide 2
Bold – comments that
Takeaways from Kenya and Uganda resonated

Issues Participant comments Common themes

Access to • “We’re geeks. We need people who can market and communicate.”
business • “At university we learned how to code, but our professors don’t • Need to partner with
skills know other things we need in the real world.” business professionals

Access to • “There is no investment in R&D. People want something quick.” • Need practical advice
financial • “I know I need some money, but I don’t know exactly how much.” (e.g., how to register a
resources business; how to
complete tenders)
Access to • “Nobody thinks we can do the jobs.”
markets • “We don’t know when the tenders come out.” • Need mentors for
• “The government and the big companies would rather outsource to business model review
foreign companies than have locals do the work.”
• “There is no place for people to find my work, or tell them it is
good.” • Need forum for
discussing and
• “The certifications people want are expensive. I have the skills, but I publicizing ideas
Access to
technical can’t afford to pay the certificate fees.”
• Need to develop
skills
communities of trust to
• “I don’t know how to find someone who can check my code.” encourage idea sharing
Access to
business • “These networking opportunities are priceless.”
networks • “If we worked together we could have capacity for the big jobs.” • Need trusted
• “I wouldn’t tell someone my idea, because they might steal it.” intermediaries for
• “We need to be organized to talk to government.” rating, referring, and
• “I need to talk to someone who has done it before.” validating products and
• “We need some mentors.” services

Encouraging Similar themes


• “There is no legal protection for intellectual property.”
regulatory across two
• “The government doesn’t make the companies work with us.”
environment geographies

slide 3
Potential interventions with donor
Emerging interventions community leadership

Potential Partner
Intervention Description Issues Addressed Organizations
Provide seed • Provide funds (and • Poor access to capital • Local angel investors;
capital culture expertise) for entrepreneurs • Poor access to business networks chamas, mulitlateral and
to take demos to full • No R& D investment bilateral donors; diaspora
conceptualization

Government • Government tenders could • Poor access to markets: customers • National and provincial
contracting require that certain classes governments; multilateral
small business or value of services be and bilateral donors
set-asides provided by micro and
small businesses

Create network • Create organizations and • Access to business networks • Business leaders;
groups and events that bring together • Poor representation in policy universities and colleges;
events ICT entrepreneurs discussions incubators, donors and
• Create spaces for foundations
entrepreneurs to work and
meet

Support skills • Provide on the job training • Access to technical skills: some • Large corporates,
development and scholarships for technicians need to update universities and technical
training programs knowledge and qualifications, self- colleges; training firms,
• Develop integrated taught technicians may not be able donors and foundations
computer science to afford certifications to prove skills
curriculum • Need practical and business skills

Knowledge base • Document process to set • Poor access to business skills • Business incubators (e.g.,
for businesses up SMEs in each country, iHub); universities;
in the region including key resources. successful entrepreneurs;
• Write up local success bilateral and multilateral
stories organizations

slide 4
Next steps

Next • Rwanda session – Tuesday, September 28


feedback • Tanzania session – Thursday, September 30
sessions

Second • Kenya – Tuesday, October 19


round • Uganda – Thursday, October 21
sessions • Tanzania – Tuesday, October 26
• Rwanda – Thursday, October 28

Draft – first • Early draft available on week of September 21-25


round • First full draft available for next consortium team
meeting during the week of October 4-8

slide 5

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi