Cerro Caliche Technical Report M Gray For Corex Gold 2007july31.10591820

Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV
Summary Report on the Caliche Gold Project, Municipio of Cucurpe, Sonora
Table of Contents
Item Page
1 Title Page
2 Table of Contents……………………………………………………………. i
3 Summary ................................................................................................. 1
4 Introduction and Terms of Reference ...................................................... 3
4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 3
4.2 Terms of Reference .............................................................................. 3
4.3 Purpose of Report ................................................................................ 3
4.4 Sources of Information ......................................................................... 3
4.5 Field Examination and Data Review by the Qualified Person............... 4
4.6 Definitions and Translations ................................................................. 4
5 Reliance on Other Experts ...................................................................... 5
6 Property description and location ............................................................ 6
6.1 Area and Location ................................................................................ 6
6.2 Claims and Title .................................................................................... 6
6.3 Surface Rights .................................................................................... 11
6.4 Mineralization ..................................................................................... 11
6.5 Environmental Liability........................................................................ 11
6.6 Permits ............................................................................................... 11
7 Access, Climate, Infrastructure, and Physiography ............................... 12
8 History ................................................................................................... 12
9 Geological Setting ................................................................................. 14
9.1 Regional Geology ............................................................................... 14
9.2 Local Geology .................................................................................... 16
10 Deposit Types ....................................................................................... 21
11 Mineralization ........................................................................................ 22
11.1 General............................................................................................... 22
11.2 Historic Mines and Showings ............................................................. 24
11.2.1 Los Japoneses – Los Cuervos......................................................... 26
11.2.2 Cabeza Blanca ................................................................................ 28
11.2.3 Buena Suerte ................................................................................... 30
11.2.4 El Colorado ...................................................................................... 30
11.2.5 Las Abejas – Veta de Oro ................................................................ 31
11.2.6 El Zorillo ........................................................................................... 31
11.2.7 La Española – La Magdalena .......................................................... 33
11.2.8 La Muñeca-La Leona-Puerto de Oro ............................................... 34
12 Exploration ............................................................................................ 35
12.1 Geologic Mapping, Geochemical/Mineralogical Sampling .................. 35
13 Drilling ................................................................................................... 35
14 Sampling Method and Approach ........................................................... 35
14.1 Sampling Method, Nature, and Spacing ............................................. 35
14.1.1 Surface Rock Chip Samples ............................................................ 35
14.2 Recovery Factors ............................................................................... 36
14.3 Sample Quality and Representativity.................................................. 36
Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 i

14.4 Sample Interval Parameters ............................................................... 37

15 Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security ........................................ 37
15.1 Personnel ........................................................................................... 37
15.2 Corex Resource Sampling Program ................................................... 37
15.2.1 Sample Security/Chain of Custody .................................................. 37
15.2.2 Sample Preparation by ALS Chemex .............................................. 38
15.2.3 Analytical Techniques used by ALS Chemex .................................. 38
16 Data Verification .................................................................................... 41
16.1 Prior Campaigns ................................................................................. 41
16.2 Corex Exploration Campaign, 2006 to 2007 ....................................... 41
16.2.1 Rock Chip Sample Assays............................................................... 41
17 Adjacent Properties ............................................................................... 42
18 Metallurgical Testing ............................................................................. 42
19 Mineral Resource Estimate ................................................................... 42
20 Other Relevant Data and Information.................................................... 42
21 Interpretation and Conclusions.............................................................. 43
22 Recommendations ................................................................................ 44
22.1 Exploration Recommendations ........................................................... 44
22.2 Recommendations for Field Procedures and QA and QC Protocols
for Future Drill Programs ............................................................ 47
23 References ............................................................................................ 48
24 Statement of Qualification ..................................................................... 50
Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 ii

List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 6.1. Location Map. ......................................................................................... 7
Figure 6.2. Concession Map. .................................................................................. 10
Figure 9.1. Geologic Map, Regional........................................................................ 15
Figure 9.2. Geologic Map, Caliche Project. ............................................................. 18
Figure 9.3. Mafic dike crosscutting granodiorite, El Colorado area. ........................ 19
Figure 9.4. Low angle fault in shaly siltstones. ........................................................ 19
Figure 9.5. Silicified thinly bedded sedimentary strata with chevron folding. .......... 20
Figure 11.1. Principal veins and historic mine workings, Caliche Project................ 25
Figure 11.2. Los Japoneses mineralized structure. ................................................ 26
Figure 11.3. Mineralized structure footwall to Los Japoneses structure.................. 27
Figure 11.4. Sericitized granodiorite, Los Cuervos area. . .................................... 27
Figure 11.5. Stockwork quartz veining in wallrock to Cabeza Blanca vein............... 28
Figure 11.6. Cabeza Blanca vein. ............................................................................ 29
Figure 11.7. Cabeza Blanca workings.. .................................................................. 29
Figure 11.8. El Colorado prospect.. ........................................................................ 30
Figure 11.9. Stockwork at Veta de Oro – Las Abejas area. .................................... 31
Figure 11.10. El Zorillo roadcut. .............................................................................. 32
Figure 11.11. La Española vein.. ............................................................................ 33
Figure 11.12. La Española vein, view looking NA350 down strike. ......................... 34
Figure 14.1. Channel Sampling, Cabeza Blanca area. ........................................... 37
List of Tables
Table Page
Table 6.1 Listing of Mining Concessions.................................................................... 9
Table 11.1. Correlation Coefficients, 374 rock chip samples ................................... 23
Table 11.2. Summary statistics, 374 rock chip samples ......................................... 23
Table 12.1. Exploration Activities Summary ............................................................. 35
Table 15.1. Check Sample Comparison .................................................................. 40
Table 16.1. Elements Analyzed and Analytical Limits .............................................. 42
Table 22.1. Recommended Work Plan and Budget, Caliche Project ...................... 46
Appendices
Appendix Page
Appendix A Rock Chip Sample Assays……………………………………..………….52
Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 iii

3 SUMMARY
The Caliche project is prospective for low sulfidation, epithermal gold-silver deposits
and intrusive-related precious metal and polymetallic deposits. The project hosts
structurally controlled zones of gold-silver mineralization hosted by diorite,
granodiorite, siltstone, and arenite. These mineralized zones form potentially bulk
minable stockworks and planar, mineralized structures or veins. Reconnaissance
mapping and geochemical sampling of the property shows that the system was
capable of creating mineralized zones of economically significant grade and the
exposed areal extent of the system is in excess of 6 km2 . The dominant structural
controls are NA330 to 350 (NW-SE) and NA030 to 260 (NE-SW) high angle
structural zones that are variably brecciated, silicified, and quartz veined. Gold
concentrations are localized within discrete structural zones and within broader
zones of parallel structures, brecciation and/or stockwork quartz veining. The
reconnaissance evaluation of the project by the author validated that the project is
prospective for three target types:
1) Stockwork and/or disseminated zones of gold-silver mineralization, mineable

by open pit or bulk underground methods.
2) High grade, planar, precious- and base-metal mineralized structural zones or
veins.
3) Concealed, intrusive related, precious metal deposits.
Examples of target type 1 include the Las Abejas-Veta de Oro, La Muñeca-La

Leona-Puerto de Oro, and Los Japoneses-Los Cuervos areas, where pervasively
sericitized, pyritic (now oxidized), and stockwork quartz veined siltstone, arenite, and
granodiorite are gold mineralized. Examples of target type 2 include the all of the
epithermal veins identified at the project. Reconnaissance sampling of these veins
has yielded as much as 13.2 gpt Au over widths of 1m, and 8.0 gpt Au over widths
of 2 meters. The textures observed at present levels of exposure are consistent with
those of the uppermost levels of epithermal vein systems, therefore significant depth
extensions to the veins may be reasonably inferred to exist. Target type 3 is
speculative and no examples of such are seen at surface. Its possible existence is
suggested by the presence of sericite-pyrite-silica and chlorite alteration
assemblages typical of intrusive related systems, and by a Mo-As geochemical
association. The size and continuity of these mineralized zones cannot be
determined by surface mapping and sampling. Drill testing is required to assess the
economic importance of the identified and postulated mineralized zones.
The identified mineral showings at Caliche are consistent with those seen at low
sulfidation epithermal mineralized systems elsewhere in the Sierra Madre and
Altiplano provinces of Mexico. These systems may form economic deposits
mineable by bulk surface or underground methods. Deposits may be in the form of
mineralized structural zones with vertical ranges of 200 to 700m and strike lengths
ranging from hundreds of meters to in excess of 1 kilometer (Albinson et al., 2001),
Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 1 of 116

or as zones of stockwork or disseminated mineralization localized by structures or

lithology. The Caliche project is prospective for both.
Work completed to date has identified drill targets meritorious of evaluation, but most
of the 6 km2 area of known gold occurrences has thus far not been mapped or
sampled in detail, thus additional geologic and geochemical surveys are necessary
to prioritize drill targets and identify additional areas of interest. The large size of the
mineralized system mandates that the initial drill program include sufficient meters to
allow for testing of numerous targets distributed throughout the system. In order to
determine the economic potential of the project, a multi-stage exploration program is
recommended, with each successive stage conditional upon results obtained from
the previous. Stage 1 consists of geologic mapping and geochemical surveys to
define initial drill targets. The second stage entails drill testing of targets identified in
Stage 1. The first phase of drilling encompasses 4,000m of reverse circulation
drilling, and if results are positive, would be followed by an additional 8,000m of
reverse circulation drilling to further test the targets developed. The total cost for the
first phase of the proposed program, which encompasses geologic and geochemical
surveys sufficient to identify drill targets, is estimated at $269,000 USD. The drilling
phase costs are estimated at $468,000 USD for the first 4,000m, and an additional
$870,000 USD for the contingent 8,000m, for a total program cost of $1.6M USD.

4 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE
4.1 Introduction
Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV (RGM) and Matthew D. Gray, the

author of this report, were asked by Corex Gold Corporation to perform an
evaluation of the Caliche gold project in Sonora, Mexico, and to provide Corex with a
technical report compliant with CSA National Instrument 43-101. This report has
been prepared to meet Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-
101 standards. The report provides a summary of the geology of the project and its
potential to host economic mineral deposits.
4.2 Terms of Reference
Corex Gold Corporation commissioned RGM to review the Caliche gold project and
to prepare a report following NI43-101 guidelines for submission as a Technical
Report. Corex trades on the TSX Venture exchange under the symbol CGE.
Matthew Gray, senior partner of RGM, an independent geosciences consulting firm
contracted by Corex, visited the project, reviewed the available geologic and
geochemical data, and took independent samples to accomplish the requested task.
4.3 Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to provide an independent assessment of the Caliche

gold project and to recommend an exploration program to enhance the economic
potential of the project. This report was prepared following the guidelines of CSA
National Instrument 43-101.
4.4 Sources of Information
In the preparation of this report the author has relied on his own observations and
independent assay data, supplemented by information obtained through review of
both published and unpublished documents and maps. In addition to the author’s
own observations and assay data, sources of information regarding location and
dimensions of mineralized showings, mines, veins, and the mineralized grades,
include:
- Geologic data generated by RGM Senior Partner Fernando Oviedo and RGM
staff geologists Isidro Flores, Ivan Romero, Hugo Vargas, Jesus Medina, and
Manuel Amador.
- Geologic, geophysical, and assay data collected and published by the

Consejo de Recursos Naturales (National Resource Council) and its
successor, the Servicio Geologico Mexicano (Mexican Geological Survey), a
Mexican Federal agency.

- Topographic and physiographic data collected and published by the Instituto

Nacional de Estadistica Geografica e Informatica (INEGI), a Mexican Federal
Agency.
- Geologic and geochemical data contained in private maps and reports

prepared by Resource Geosciences de Mexico for Corex.
Data that was not generated by the author or RGM has not been independently
verified, except as noted in Item 16 of this report. Where information from unverified
sources is relevant to interpretations and discussions of the economic potential of
the project, the source of information is explicitly mentioned. The author and RGM
do not accept responsibility for the interpretations and representations made in this
report where they were the result of erroneous, false, or misrepresented data.
4.5 Field Examination and Data Review by the Qualified Person.
The Qualified Person responsible for this report, Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G.,
President of Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV, conducted a 3 day field
visit to the Caliche project during the period 16 to 18 July 2007. The purpose was to
examine the property geology, the most important known mineral occurrences and
mine workings, and to collect independent geochemical samples of altered and
mineralized areas. Two full days were spent on site visiting known mineralized
areas in the project area. The author spent several days in RGM’s Hermosillo,
Sonora office reviewing geologic and assay data provided by Corex and obtained
from public domain sources.
Prior to the field visit and data review conducted for the purposes of this Technical
Report, the author had been directly involved in mineral exploration programs in the
region, including visits to the Caliche project, but the author had not conducted
detailed examinations of the Caliche project.
4.6 Definitions and Translations
CRM - Consejo de Recursos Minerales (Natural Resources

Council
DGM - Direccion General de Minas (Central Mining Department)
gpt - grams per tonne
Corex - Corex Gold Corporation
Has. - hectares
km - kilometer
M - million
NAD - North American Datum
NSR - Net smelter return
oz. - Troy Ounce
ppm - parts per million
RGM - Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV

SEMARNAT - Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

(Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources)
SGM - Servicio Geologico Mexicano (Mexican Geological Survey)
SMO - Sierra Madre Occidental
UTM - Universal Transverse Mercator
5 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS
Appropriate scientific methods and best professional judgment were utilized in the
collection and interpretation of data discussed in this report. However, users of this
report are cautioned that the evaluation methods used herein are subject to inherent
uncertainties and assumptions, over which Matthew D. Gray and RGM have no
control. These uncertainties and assumptions are stated herein. Users of this report
are hereby advised to be aware of and understand these uncertainties and
assumptions.
For the purposes of this report, Matthew D. Gray and RGM have relied on assay
data provided by ALS Chemex Laboratories and topographic and geographic data
provided by the Consejo de Recursos Minerales, the Servicio Geologico Mexicano,
and the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia y Informatica. Matthew D. Gray
and RGM have not independently verified the information obtained from these
sources, however Matthew D. Gray is not aware of any information that would lead
him to believe or lead him to suspect that the information from these sources is not
accurate or is unreliable.
This Technical Report and all publications, exhibits, documentation, conclusions,

and other work products obtained or developed by RGM for this Technical Report
are for sole and exclusive use of Corex Gold Corporation. This Technical Report
was prepared specifically for the purpose of complying with Canadian Securities
Administrators National Instrument 43-101 and may be distributed to third parties
and published without prior consent of RGM if the Technical Report is presented in
its entirety without omissions or modifications, subject to the regulations of NI43-101.
Consent is expressly given for submission of this Technical Report to all competent
regulatory agencies, including but not limited to the British Columbia Securities
Commission, the Ontario Securities Commission, the Alberta Securities
Commission, the TSX-Venture Exchange, and the Toronto Stock Exchange.
However all reports, publications, exhibits, documentation, conclusions, and other
work products obtained or developed by RGM during completion of this Technical
Report shall be and remain the property of RGM. Unauthorized use or reuse by
third parties of reports, publications, exhibits, documentation, conclusions, and other
work products obtained or developed by RGM for the purposes of this Technical
Report is prohibited.

6 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
6.1 Area and Location
The Caliche project comprises 15 mining concessions covering a total of 1,560.48

hectares and is located in the municipality of Cucurpe, State of Sonora, Mexico,
approximately 40 km SE of the city of Magdalena, Sonora and 150 km N-NE of the
city of Hermosillo, Sonora (Figure 6.1).
The center of the project area is located at UTM Zone 12, 536,740E 3,365,100N,
Datum ITRF92 GRS80 (equivalent to WGS84 G730 within a few centimeters), or
North Latitude 30o 24’ 55” West Longitude 110o 37’ 07”, North American Datum 27
Mexico. All UTM coordinates refered to in this report are UTM WGS84 G370 unless
otherwise noted.
6.2 Claims and Title
Mining and exploration rights in Mexico are controlled by the Federal Government,
and are assigned to third parties by the granting of mining concessions. Claims at
the Caliche project were originally titled under a previous regulatory regime which
recognized two classes of concessions, exploration and exploitation, however
reforms to the mining law enacted in 2006 automatically converted all existing
exploration and exploitation concessions into mining concessions which are
administered by the Direccion General de Minas (DGM), a subsecretariat of the
cabinet level Secretaria de Economia. Mining concessions are valid for a 50 year
period, at the end of which they may be renewed. To maintain concessions in good
legal standing, concession holders are obligated to pay semi-annual tax payments
and to annually file documentation of exploration or development work at the
concession.
The Caliche project consists of 15 mining concessions covering in aggregate

1,560.48 hectares. Concession information is summarized in Table 6.1, and the
concessions are shown in Figure 6.2. The legal standing of these claims and the
ownership of surface rights have not been verified by the author or RGM. Corex
employs registered mineral property landmen and lawyers to verify legal validity of
concessions, effect mining concession tax payments, and to file all required
documents needed to maintain concessions in good legal standing. Corex
contracted independent legal counsel in Hermosillo, Sonora to review the claim
status and the resulting opinion was that the claims are in good legal standing.
Corex Gold Corporation holds its interest in the project through Corex Global SA de
CV (Corex Global), a wholly owned Mexican subsidiary of Corex Gold Corporation.

Figure 6.1. Caliche Project Location Map.

The Cabeza Blanca concession is titled to Sr. Hector Fernando Albelais Peral. Sr.
Albelais and Corex Global have entered into an agreement whereby Corex Global
may obtain a 100% interest in the concession with no NSR in consideration for
staged cash payments over a 36 month period totaling $120,000 USD. Corex
Global has thus far made payments totaling $10,000 USD towards acquisition of the
Cabeza Blanca concession, with the next contractually stipulated payment of
$12,000 USD due within 180 days after the signing date of 25 May 2007.
The Huevo de Oro No.1, Huevo de Oro No. 2, El Huevo de Oro (Title 212,857), El
Huevo de Oro (Title 220,208), Teresita (Title 220,160), Teresita (Title 220,210), Abel
Fracc. I, Abel Fracc. II, and Guadalupe concessions are titled to Sr. Juan Pedro
Fernandez Duarte. Sr. Fernandez is also 67% owner of the Abel concession. Sr.
Fernandez and Corex Global have entered into an agreement whereby Corex Global
may obtain 100% of Sr. Fernandez’ interest in the above mentioned concessions
with no NSR in consideration for staged cash payments over a 36 month period
totaling $1,642,000 USD. Corex Global has thus far made payments totaling
$38,000 USD towards acquisition of these claims, with the next contractually
stipulated payment of $28,860 USD due within 180 days after the signing date of 7
February 2007.
A 33% interest in the Abel concession is owned by Sr. Jose Arturo Galvez
Magallanes. Sr. Galvez and Corex Global have entered into an agreement whereby
Corex Global may obtain 100% of Sr. Galvez’ interest in the Abel concession with no
NSR in consideration for staged cash payments over a 36 month period totaling
$70,000 USD. Corex Global has thus far made payments totaling $2,000 USD
towards acquisition of Sr. Galvez’ interest in the Abel concession, with the next
contractually stipulated payment of $1,140 USD due within 180 days after the
signing date of 7 February 2007.
The El Rosario Fracc. 1 and El Centro concessions are titled to Sr. Eduardo Rivas
Hoffman. Sr. Rivas and Corex Global have entered into an agreement whereby
Corex Global may obtain a 100% interest in the concessions with no NSR in
consideration for staged cash payments over a 36 month period totaling $1,150,000
USD. Corex Global has thus far made payments totaling $30,000 USD towards
acquisition of the El Rosario Fracc. 1 and El Centro concessions, with the next
signing date of 30 March 2007.
The Ernesto concession is titled to Sr. Ernesto Lopez Estrada and Sr. Mario
Peñuñuri Bringas. Srs. Lopez and Peñuñuri have entered into an agreement with
Corex Global whereby Corex Global may obtain a 100% interest in the concession
with no NSR in consideration for staged cash payments over a 36 month period
totaling $250,000 USD. Corex Global has thus far made payments totaling $10,000
USD towards acquisition of the Ernesto concession, with the next contractually
stipulated payment of $10,000 USD due within 180 days after the signing date of 30
March 2007.

The Tres Amigos concession is titled to Sr. Jesus Hector Pavlovich Camou and Sr.
Raul Ernest Seym Gutierrez. Srs. Pavlovich and Seym have entered into an
agreement with Corex Global whereby Corex Global may obtain a 100% interest in
the concession with no NSR in consideration for staged cash payments over a 36
month period totaling $100,000 USD. Corex Global has thus far made payments
totaling $10,000 USD towards acquisition of the Ernesto concession, with the next
signing date of 4May 2007.
Table 6.1 Listing of Mining Concessions
Number Concession Title Number Concession Holder Area (Has.)
1 El Huevo de Oro 212857 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 10.0000

2 Guadalupe 211715 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 24.5940
3 Teresita 222160 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 99.3323
4 Huevo de Oro No. 1 222098 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 3.2979
5 Abel Fracc I 220657 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 99.0935
Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte:
6 Abel 220838 147.9804
José Arturo Gálvez Magallanes
7 Teresita 220210 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 0.5886
8 Abel Fracc II 220658 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 11.8907
9 Cabeza Blanca 175488 Héctor Fernando Albelais Peral 10.0000
10 El Centro 221094 Edward Rivas Hoffman 3.7707
Jesús Héctor Pavlovich Camou:
11 Tres Amigos 166174 20.0000
Raúl Ernesto Seym Gutiérrez
12 El Rosario Fracc I 221148 Edward Rivas Hoffman 399.6929
13 El Huevo de Oro 220208 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 510.8383
Ernesto López Estrada:
14 Ernesto 222367 219.3754
Mario Peñúñuri Bringas
15 Huevo de Oro No. 2 222099 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 0.0254

Figure 6.2. Concession Map.

6.3 Surface Rights
Surface rights in the project are controlled by the Rancho Cerro Prieto, a family
owned ranch represented by Sr. Fernando Padres Gauna. Exploration work
conducted to date has been exclusively on this privately held land for which Corex
has received permission to enter and explore in consideration for annual payments
of $8,000 USD. The agreement is valid for 5 years and was executed on 30 March
2007. RGM has not independently verified surface ownership.
6.4 Mineralization
Numerous abandoned small mines, exploration workings, and alteration zones are
present within the property area. Most are developed on high angle mineralized
structural zones or veins, and the metals produced or sought include gold and silver.
Lead, zinc, and copper are present in minor amounts but are not of economic
significance. These mineralized occurrences are described in Item 11 of this report.
6.5 Environmental Liability
No significant environmental liabilities are apparent. Small abandoned mines and

waste piles are present but are not generating acid drainage. No plant facilities or
tailings piles were identified within the project area.
6.6 Permits
Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Secretaria
del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and
Natural Resources), known by its acronym SEMARNAT. The Caliche project is not
included within any specially protected, Federally designated ecological zones,
therefore basic exploration activities are regulated under Norma Oficial Mexicana
NOM-120-ECOL-1997. NOM120 allows for activities including mapping,
geochemical sampling, geophysical surveys, mechanized trenching, road building,
and drilling. If each particular activity does not exceed a defined threshold for
surface disturbance, which varies by activity, and if in aggregate these activities will
affect less than 25% of the project surface area, the project operator is required only
to inform SEMARNAT in writing of the proposed exploration activities. If after 5 days
SEMARNAT has not formally objected, work may proceed immediately. NOM120
defines the impact mitigation procedures that must be followed for each activity. All
exploration work conducted to date has been under the auspices of NOM 120.
Mine construction and operation activities generally require preparation of a

Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its
acronym as an MIA. A properly prepared MIA application and operating permit for a
project that does not affect Federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves
can usually be approved in 12 months. Most mining and construction activities will

also require Autorizacion en Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change

Authorization) known by its acronym as a CUS. To obtain a CUS the soliciting party
must present a report summarizing the biological and ecological characteristics of
the affected area and the applicant must pay compensation to the Federal Forestry
Commission. The amount of payment is determined by the type of vegetation
affected, degree of impact, and estimated cost to reclaim the surface area that will
be disturbed.
7 ACCESS, CLIMATE, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
Road access to the Caliche project is via paved Federal Highway 15 from Hermosillo
to the town of Magdalena, a distance of 185 km, thence southeast via the paved
Magdalena – Cucurpe two lane highway a distance of 40km, thence turning
northeast onto an unsurfaced all weather road continuing 14km to a locked gate,
thence continuing 4.8 km into the center of the project area. Straight line distance
from Magdalena to the project area is 40km. (Figure 6.1). Driving time from
Magdalena is 1.5 hours. Driving time from Hermosillo is 3.5 hours.
Basic services and provisions including phone, lodging, meals, gasoline, etc. may be
obtained in Magdalena. The border towns of Nogales, Sonora and Nogales, Arizona
are within a three hour drive of the project.
Vertical relief in the project area is approximately 710m, from a maximum elevation
of 1720m at Cerro El Caliche to a minimum elevation of 1080m in the arroyos
draining the southernmost portion of the project area. A radial dendritic drainage
pattern with moderate hill slopes is centered about Cerro El Caliche. Vegetation is
dominated by short grasses and mesquite, ocotillo, and saguaro cactus.
Exploration and mining work can be conducted in all seasons, although the periods
June to September and December to January are often marked by abundant rains.
During periods of significant rainfall, unimproved roads may become temporarily
impassable. Summertime high temperatures may exceed 40o C. During the
wintertime snow accumulations are possible. Climates in the project area are
classified as hot, semi-arid and temperate, semi-arid (CRM, 1992).
8 HISTORY
The Caliche prospect lies within the Cucurpe mining region. Earliest recorded
mining activity in the region dates to the 1800’s and is evidenced by numerous small
scale artisanal mines and surface cuts, principally along structurally controlled
mineralized zones and veins. Discovery and development of the Santa Gertrudis
gold deposits by Phelps Dodge in 1986 spurred exploration activity in the region.
The Santa Gertrudis deposits exhibited some characteristics typical of “Carlin type”
gold deposits, and the consequently the region was explored for similar sedimentary
rock-hosted gold deposits.

In the 1990’s Cambior Exploration assembled a mining concession package of 4,200

hectares that encompassed part of the Caliche project. Cambior referred to the
project as “Los Japoneses” and completed extensive surface geochemical sampling
of the project and a small drilling program prior to abandoning the project in the late
1990’s. During this period the author was employed by Cambior in Mexico and
visited the project in 1997 as part of an internal review, but the author did not provide
technical services to the project nor have project oversight responsibilities. A general
downturn in the commodities markets and financial problems unique to Cambior
resulted in Cambior’s extensive reduction of exploration budgets in 1998 and 1999,
and finally the closure of Cambior’s Mexican exploration program in early 2000.
Cambior conducted a small reverse circulation drilling program at the project in the
1997 and 1998 prior to abandoning Mexico. The detailed results are unknown to the
author, however the author’s site visit notes, taken while reviewing the project for
Cambior, indicate that the 1997 drilling program comprised 2,245m in 15 drillholes of
150m average length. During the field review completed for the purposes of this
report, additional Cambior drillhole collars were located, indicating that at least 8
drillholes were completed in 1998. Information for the 1998 drillholes is not
available. All 1997 drillholes were angled 45o and were designed to cut across
interpreted northwest striking structural controls. Two areas were tested, the Los
Japoneses area by 13 drillholes, and the El Colorado area by 2 drillholes. All
drillholes intercepted anomalous to ore grade, near surface gold mineralization, with
the best intercepts reported as 24m @ 1.1 gpt Au, 6m @ 12.9 gpt Au, 29m @ 0.6
gpt Au, 8m @ 3.4 gpt Au, 5m @ 4.7 gpt Au, and 92m @ 0.3 gpt Au. The original
assay results, drill logs, and drillhole location maps are unavailable and the location
of these drillholes and their intercepts is not known. Matthew D. Gray obtained this
information directly from Cambior while he was an employee of Cambior, however
Matthew D. Gray and RGM have not independently verified this information, but
Matthew D. Gray is not aware of any information that would lead him to believe or
lead him to suspect that this information is not accurate or is unreliable.
Since Cambior’s exit from the project, no other exploration activities are known to
have occurred at the project.
In 2006 Corex Global SA de CV, a subsidiary of Corex Gold Corporation, initiated

reconnaissance evaluations of the Cucurpe region and identified the Caliche project
as being of significant interest and commenced negotiations to acquire the key
concessions. After agreements in principal were obtained, RGM, working on behalf
of Corex, commenced a program of geological mapping and geochemical rock chip
sampling, and this work has been continuously advanced since February 2007 until
the present, as summarized in Item 12 of this report. Alan Hitchborn, Vice
President Exploration of Corex Gold, manages and directs the exploration program,
and RGM Senior Partner Fernando Oviedo supervises the work of the following
RGM geologists assigned to the project: Isidro Flores, Hugo Vargas, Ivan Romero,
Jesus Medina, and Manuel Amador.

9 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
9.1 Regional Geology
The Caliche project lies on the western flank of the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO)
province, within the Valley and Ranges subprovince. The SMO province comprises
a regionally extensive Eocene to Miocene volcanic field which extends southeast
from the United States-Mexico border to central Mexico. The Valley and Ranges
subprovince which hosts the Caliche project is characterized by extensional normal
faulting that has created an alternating sequence of horsts and grabens, equivalent
to Basin and Range type extensional features of the Western United States.
Mountain ranges and valleys trend N-S and NW-SE. Maps published by the
Servicio Geologico Mexicano (SGM, translated as Mexican Geological Survey)
indicate that the Caliche project area is underlain by a Jurassic to Cretaceous aged
volcanosedimentary sequence which has been intruded by granodioritic and dioritic
intrusions of presumed Tertiary age (Figure 9.1). Rhyolitic volcanic rocks that
correlate with the Upper Series of the SMO overlie the Jurassic volcanosedimentary
sequence (SGM, 1999). The Jurassic units are deformed, and the SGM correlates
this deformation with mid-Cretaceous compression and development of thrust faults.

Figure 9.1. Geologic Map, Regional.

9.2 Local Geology
Detailed geologic mapping is currently in progress and has been completed thus far
only for the central area of the project. Not all contact relationships have been fully
discerned, but work done to date has identified as many as seven different intrusive
lithologies and two apparently distinct sedimentary sequences. The southern portion
of the project area is underlain by dioritic and granodioritic, medium grained
equigranular intrusive rocks. The central portion of the project area is underlain by
clastic strata comprising siltstones, arkoses, greywackes, and less commonly,
quartzites (Figure 9.2). Spherulitic rhyolitic sills intrude the clastic strata. Both
intrusive and structural contacts were observed between the sedimentary strata and
the dioritic and granodioritic intrusive rocks. Intrusive rocks present include:
• Medium to course grained granodiorite with ~20% quartz grains intergrown

with white alkali feldspar, locally with eutectic intergrowth textures without
discernable mafic minerals. Lack of mafics is possibly the result of texturally
and mineralogically destructive sericite alteration.
• Medium grained quartz-alkali feldspar equigranular granodiorite with <10%

quartz grains and no discernable mafic minerals. Lack of mafics is possibly
the result of texturally and mineralogically destructive sericite alteration.
• Medium to coarse grained weakly porphyritic granodiorite, with very course

grained zoned alkali feldspar phenocrysts in a fine to medium grained
groundmass of equigranular quartz and feldspar with subordinate biotite.
• Fine grained, dark grey-green colored andesitic intrusive with occasional fine
to medium grained plagioclase laths in a fine grained to aphanitic matrix.
• Medium to coarse grained plagioclase hornblende diorite.
• Coarse grained, very magnetic, quartz dioritic intrusion characterized by very

course grained biotite crystals, light greenish brown in color and possibly
phlogopitic.
• Spherulitic rhyolitic units exposed at Cerro El Caliche, interpreted by project

geologists to be sills intruding the clastic sequence.
Preliminary mapping indicates that finer grained textures may be characteristic of

intrusion margins, and granodioritic rocks are in places crosscut by dioritic/andesitic
dikes (Figure 9.3), however detailed mapping is required to define the relationships
between the differing intrusive phases.
At the extreme western edge of the concession package roadcuts expose deformed
shaly siltstones that appear similar to Cretaceous strata exposed elsewhere in the
region. These strata are distinct from the immature clastic sediments exposed in the

center of the project area. They reflect a different provenance, apparently lacking
detrital input from adjacent volcanic or igneous terranes, and a deeper marine
depositional environment. Low angle structures, interpreted as thrust faults, are
exposed in these strata (Figure 9.4). Similar strata are exposed at lower elevations
in the Los Japoneses area, and include calcareous beds. Silicified and deformed
thinly bedded sedimentary strata are exposed in the arroyo between Los Japoneses
and Los Cuervos (Figure 9.5) and may represent tectonic deformation associated
with regional thrusting.
The structural pattern at the Caliche project is dominated by NA330 to NA350

striking, moderately to steeply dipping extensional veins and mineralized structural
zones that crosscut all rock types (Figure 9.2). Open space vein textures, vertical
slickenlines, and fault plane chatter marks suggest that the structures exhibited
normal displacement. Total displacement across these structures is unknown. In
some cases they form lithologic contacts suggestive of significant displacement,
whereas in others the structures show no appreciable offset of mappable geologic
features.

Figure 9.2. Detailed Geologic Map, Caliche Project.

Figure 9.3. Mafic dike crosscutting granodiorite, El Colorado area.
Figure 9.4. Low angle fault in shaly siltstones, possibly Cretaceous.

Figure 9.5. Silicified thinly bedded sedimentary strata with chevron folding, Los Japoneses
area.

10 DEPOSIT TYPES
The mineral deposits present in the project area, and the deposit type being sought,
are epithermal, low sulfidation gold-silver deposits. Such deposits may be present
as veins and/or disseminated deposits and hosted by intrusive, volcanic, and
sedimentary rocks. Features common to such deposits (Buchanan, 1981; Hayba et
al., 1985; Heald et al., 1987; Bonham, 1988; Berger and Henley, 1989; Albinson et
al., 2001) include:
- Intermediate to felsic, calc-alkaline volcanic host rocks.

- Association with intrusive centers.
- Alteration mineral assemblages dominated by sericite, quartz, adularia, and
chlorite.
- Variable Au:Ag ratios.
- Ore mineralogy characterized by argentite, tetrahedrite, tennantite, native
silver, native gold, and base-metal sulfides.
- Vertical geochemical zoning, with well defined upper and lower elevation
limits to economic mineralization, over vertical ranges of 200 to 700m.
- Open space filling vein textures.
- Quartz and carbonate gangue minerals.
- Ore and gangue mineral textures indicative of low temperature environments.
The majority of gold production from Cucurpe region has come from this type of
deposit. The most significant historically exploited deposits and deposits currently
being evaluated are listed below and include:
- Santa Gertrudis open pit gold mine, located 27km N-NW of Caliche, operated
first by Phelps Dodge, and later by Campbell Resources, with total gold
production of 432,000 ounces from approximately 564,838 ounces of gold mined
(Kern and Sibthorpe, 2005).
- Mercedes Gold Project, underground vein target, located 14km E-SE of Caliche,
currently being drill tested by Meridian Gold, who has reported discovery of an
ore shoot with average drill intercepts of 5.42m true width @ 11.4 gpt Au and
153 gpt Ag (Meridian Gold, 2007).
The mineralization described for the mines and exploration projects discussed in this
section is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the Caliche, Sonora
property. The author has not reviewed the data upon which the production and
drillhole intercept data in this section are based. The author cannot comment on the
accuracy of these data. The estimates were obtained from sources believed to be
reliable but cannot be verified.

11 MINERALIZATION
11.1 General
Numerous epithermal veins and mineralized structural zones are exposed in the
project area. Most strike NA330 to NA350 with steep dips to the northeast.
Northeast-striking veins of lesser width and length were observed to crosscut the
northwest-striking veins. Host rocks include siltstones, fine to medium grained
arkoses, greywackes, quartzites, dioritic and granodioritic intrusive rocks, and
rhyolitic volcanic sills. Some mineralized zones locally follow lithological contacts.
The historically mined mineralized zones are structurally controlled and they
crosscut all rock types. Mineralized structures are characterized by pervasive
silicification, replacement and open-space filling silica veining, and brecciation. The
most intensely quartz veined and brecciated zones are typically no more than 3
meters wide, but less intense quartz veining and brecciation, and/or parallel
structures, occur over widths of several meters in the hangingwalls and footwalls of
the main structures. Veins and mineralized structural zones can be continuously
traced for as much as 1,200 meters along strike and are exposed over vertical
ranges of as much as 220 meters. The more intensely exploited zones have been
nearly continuously mined or prospected over as much as 800m of strike extent.
Vein textures indicate multiple stages of veining, and silica replacement of calcite.
The multi-stage veins are comprised of aplitic white silica, aphanitic dense silica, and
open space filling drusy quartz. Silicified healed breccias are present in the same
structural zones that host the banded veins and consist of angular white silica
fragments in grey aphanitic silica matrix. The veins exposed at surface are oxidized
and Fe-oxide stained. They originally contained no more than a few percent sulfides
and sulfosalts. Primary vein minerals identified in unoxidized vein material collected
from mine stockpiles include pyrite, and occasionally tetrahedrite and galena. Host
rocks are typically sericitized and were originally pyritic, as evidenced by
disseminated iron oxides pseudomorphous after pyrite.
The gold occurrences at Caliche are associated with elevated silver contents, and
occasionally, with elevated lead and zinc concentrations. Analysis of 374 rock chip
samples that contained greater than 50 ppb gold does not yield significant positive
correlations between gold and any metal other than silver (Table 11.1). A strong
positive statistical correlation between Cu and Sb, with a correlation coefficient of
0.99, indicates that tetrahedrite ((Cu,Fe)12Sb4S13) is probably the only cupriferous
mineral present. Positive correlations are noted between Pb, Zn, and Mo,
suggesting a coeval deposition of these metals, and Mo and As positively correlate.

Table 11.1 Correlation Coefficients, 374 rock chip samples containing >50 pbb Au.
Correlation Coefficient Matrix, Major Metals, Rock Chip Samples

Au Ag Cu Pb Zn As Mo Sb
Au 1.00 0.49 0.01 0.20 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.00
Ag 0.50 1.00 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.03 0.07 0.21
Cu 0.02 0.23 1.00 0.08 0.04 0.10 0.17 0.99
Pb 0.24 0.25 0.09 1.00 0.44 0.26 0.33 0.04
Zn 0.11 0.10 0.04 0.43 1.00 0.05 0.11 0.01
As 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.26 0.05 1.00 0.70 0.08
Mo 0.06 0.08 0.17 0.34 0.10 0.69 1.00 0.15
Sb 0.01 0.22 0.99 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.15 1.00
At the exposures sampled, gold and silver are the only metals present in
economically significant amounts, although significant Pb and Zn contents are
sometimes observed. The average metal contents of 374 rock chip samples that
contained at least 50 ppb Au are 1.11 gpt Au, 22 gpt Ag, and less than 0.2% each of
Pb and Zn (Table 11.2). Assay results for major metals for all 457 rock chip samples
are included as Appendix A.
Table 11.2. Summary statistics, 374 rock chip samples containing >50 ppb Au.
All metal contents reported in ppb

Au Ag Cu Pb Zn As Mo Sb
Avg 1.11 22 173 1952 1241 37 8 5
Max 14.40 778 24800 30600 31900 1170 321 1370
Min 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Std Dev 2.00 61 1289 3457 2692 103 26 72
The known mineral occurrences occur within an 6km2 zone that hosts hundreds of
mineralized structures and veins and is associated with large scale but irregular
zones of hydrothermal alteration including hematization, pyritization (now evidenced
by Fe-oxides), weak silicification, sericitization, and chloritization. Detailed mapping
is required to determine the relationships between the differing alteration
assemblages.
In respect to geologic setting, structural style, and ore and gangue mineralogy, the
mineral occurrences visited by the author at the Caliche project are similar to many
epithermal, low sulfidation gold-silver-polymetallic deposits, as discussed in Item 10
of this report.

11.2 Historic Mines and Showings
The Caliche property hosts hundreds of surface cuts, prospect pits, and small scale
underground mines developed on steeply- to moderately-dipping, structurally
controlled mineralized zones and quartz veins (Figure 11.1). Corex has thus far
conducted only reconnaissance sampling of the most prominent and accessible
mineralized zones. For purposes of this review, eight areas of historic mining
activity were visited in order to characterize the style and setting of gold
mineralization at the Caliche project. Areas visited by M Gray are briefly described
in this section.

Figure 11.1. Principal veins and historic mine workings, Caliche Project.

11.2.1 Los Japoneses – Los Cuervos
The Los Japoneses area includes the Los Japoneses and Los Cuervos mine
workings, with the latter being the southern extension of the former. The
underground mine workings at Los Japoneses exploited the vein over at least an 80
meter vertical interval and the historic workings and prospects expose the vein for a
strike length of 550 meters. Stoped widths are as much as 3 meters. The vein is
hosted by siltstone, arkose, massive granodiorite, and a granodioritic sill. The vein
strikes NA320 to 340 and dips 65 to 80 degrees northeast (Figure 11.2). Wallrocks
are sericitized and are cut by variable amounts of quartz veinlets. The wallrock is
now oxidized, but originally contained several percent disseminated fine grained
pyrite. Parallel mineralized structures are present in the footwall of the Japoneses
structure and yielded as much as 12 gpt Au over widths of 1m (Figure 11.3). The
southernmost extent of the structure, by local usage termed the Los Cuervos vein, is
hosted by sericitized and pyritic granodiorite, which may be significantly auriferous
even when significant veining is absent. Outcrops of pervasively sericitized and
pyritic granodiorite with patchy pervasive silicification and less than 2% quartz vein
stockwork assayed as much as 1.3 gpt Au at Los Cuervos (Figure 11.4) indicating
potential for disseminated or stockwork style mineralization.
Figure 11.2. Los Japoneses mineralized structure. Photo looking NA320 down strike of
structure. Geologist M Gray has hammer on planar hangingwall fault plane. Sample B14048
taken across stoped portion of vein yielded 2.1 gpt Au and 77 gpt Au. Wallrock is siltstone.

Figure 11.3. Mineralized structure footwall to Los Japoneses structure. Photo looking NA340
down strike of structure. Sample B14056 taken across 1m yielded 12 gpt Au. Sample C302405
collected by M Gray across 1m of the same zone yielded 4.1 gpt Au. Wallrock is granodioritic
sill.
Figure 11.4. Sericitized granodiorite with traces of silica veining and disseminated oxidized
pyrite, Los Cuervos area. Sample B14192 taken across 1m yielded 0.5 gpt Au. Sample
C302406 collected by M Gray across same zone yielded 1.3 gpt Au.

11.2.2 Cabeza Blanca
The Cabeza Blanca showing comprises a 700m long, NA350 striking, 70 degree
northeast dipping mineralized structural zone that has been stoped over widths of as
much 5 meters. The vein is exposed over a vertical range of 120 meters. Wallrock
to the stoped zones is quartz veined and sericitized fine grained arenite (Figure
11.5). Vein textures indicate multiple stages of quartz deposition and casts after
bladed calcite are preserved within the vein (Figure 11.6). The structure has been
continuously mined at surface over hundreds of meters (Figure 11.7).
Reconnaissance sampling of the vein yielded as much as 5.9 gpt Au over a 1m
width.
Figure 11.5. Stockwork quartz veining in wallrock to Cabeza Blanca vein.

Figure 11.6. Cabeza Blanca vein. Casts after bladed calcite in white sugary quartz vein.
Figure 11.7. Cabeza Blanca workings. View looking west at open cuts along Cabeza Blanca
vein.

11.2.3 Buena Suerte
The Buena Suerte prospect comprises a 150m long mineralized structural zone
hosted by arkosic arenites and a granodioritic sill. The structure strikes NA340 and
dips 85 degrees to the northeast. Shallow workings expose a 1m wide zone of drusy
quartz veining along the structure, but of greater interest are zones of minor quartz
vein stockworks peripheral to the Buena Suerte structure. Reconnaissance
sampling of these zones yielded up to 0.5 gpt Au, suggesting the possibility for
discovery of disseminated or bulk minable mineralized zones. Sample C302404
collected by M Gray from the wallrock to the Buena Suerte structure yielded 3.2 gpt
Au and is a duplicate of sample B14089 that assayed 2.8 gpt Au.
11.2.4 El Colorado
Prospects and workings in the El Colorado area expose multi-stage silicified breccia
veins and banded and drusy quartz veined structural zones. The mineralized
structures are hosted by sericitized and chloritized granodiorite, and the most
prominent structures strike NA 335 and dip 55 to 65 degrees to the northeast. These
structures crop put over strike lengths in excess of 100 meters. They are crosscut
by northeast striking quartz veins (Figure 11.8). Reconnaissance sampling of the
main northwest striking structure yielded as much as 2.4 gpt Au over a 2m width. A
representative grab sample, C302402, collected by M Gray over a 1.5 m wide zone
of intensely silicified and brecciated granodiorite yielded 1.4 gpt Au.
Figure 11.8. El Colorado prospect. Geologist Isidro Flores has hammer on northeast striking
vertical quartz vein that crosscuts northwest striking, northeast dipping quartz vein (seen
from upper left corner of photo, trending down to feet of Flores). Host rock is sericitized
granodiorite.

11.2.5 Las Abejas – Veta de Oro
The Las Abejas – Veta de Oro area encompasses numerous northwest striking,
northeast dipping veins and mineralized structural zones, hosted by siltstones and
fine grained arenites. The Veta de Oro - Las Abejas structure extends over a strike
length of 750 meters and has been mined over widths of as much as 2 meters.
Reconnaissance sampling of the structure has yielded as much as 3.0 gpt Au over a
0.8 meter width. The country rock in the Las Abejas area is a weakly pyritic (now
oxidized) siltstone that is crosscut by less than 2% quartz veinlets. Reconnaissance
sampling of these outcrops has yielded as much as 1.0 gpt Au, suggesting the
possibility for discovery of significant gold mineralization that is not restricted to the
major structures (Figure 11.9).
Figure 11.9. Stockwork at Veta de Oro – Las Abejas area. Fine grained hematitic arenite with
traces of disseminated fine grained Fe-oxide after pyrite and <2% silica stockwork
microveinlets. Sample site B14413, 1.0 gpt Au over 1.4 meters.
11.2.6 El Zorillo
The El Zorillo area host numerous northwest striking, steeply northeast- and
southwest-dipping mineralized structural zones and quartz veins hosted by dioritic
and granodioritic intrusions. In contrast to other vein zones at the Caliche prospect,
at El Zorillo white vitreous massive quartz veins (“bull quartz veins”) are commonly
present. Stoping on these veins indicate that they are locally mineralized, and
reconnaissance sampling of them has yielded as much 1.2 gpt Au over 1.2 m

widths. Structurally controlled zones of dense silicification with abundant iron oxides
and amethyst veins were also observed, and the former have yielded as much as
5.8 gpt over sample widths of 4 meters (Figure 11.10). Alteration associated with
mineralization at El Zorillo includes pervasive chloritization and pervasive
sericitization.
Figure 11.10. El Zorillo roadcut. Geologist Isidro Flores has hammer on northwest striking
silicified zone that contains abundant earthy gossanous dark oxides. Host rock is
granodiorite. Sample B14160 collected over 4m at this site yielded 5.8 gpt Au. Sample
C302401 collected by M Gray over a 4m width yielded 5.2 gpt Au.

11.2.7 La Española – La Magdalena
The La Española structure strikes NA350 and dips 65 degrees to the northeast. It is
traceable on surface for 600 meters of strike length and the Magdalena vein is
interpreted to be the northwest strike continuation of it, yielding a total strike length
of at least 1,300 meters Figure (11.1). It is up to 2m wide, and in contrast to other
veins seen at Caliche, no evidence of explosive brecciation was seen at La
Española. The vein is composed of rhythmically banded white and grey sugary and
drusy quartz (Figures 11.11 and 11.12) hosted by fine grained arenite and a
granodioritic sill. Surface samples collected across the vein yielded up to 2m @
8.0 gpt Au and 92 gpt Ag.
Figure 11.11. La Española vein. Samples of vein showing banded texture.

Figure 11.12. La Española vein. Vein passes in front of geologist I Flores. View looking
NA350 down strike of vein. Cerro El Caliche in background.
11.2.8 La Muñeca-La Leona-Puerto de Oro
This area hosts northwest- and northeast-striking quartz veins and mineralized
structural zones hosted by granodiorite intrusive and fine grained arenites.
Individual structures can be traced as far as 950 meters and stoped vein widths are
as much as 2m. Reconnaissance sampling of the structures yielded as much as 2m
@ 6.1 gpt Au. and 1m @ 13.1 gpt Au. The host rock granodiorite is pervasively
sericitized and contains a few percent disseminated Fe-oxide pseudomorphous after
pyrite. Patchy pervasive silicification was also observed. The area is of interest
because of the relatively high density of mineralized structures of diverse
orientations and the pervasive sericite-pyrite+silica alteration assemblage,
suggesting the possibility of relatively broad zones of stockwork mineralization.

12 EXPLORATION
Prior to commencement of Corex’s exploration program in 2006, the only recorded

modern exploration program known to have been conducted at the property was that
of Cambior Exploration in the period 1996 to 1998, as discussed in Item 8 of this
report.
Corex commenced reconnaissance exploration of the region in late 2006, and after
Memorandums of Understanding were executed with concession owners, project
evaluation began in February 2007 and continues to present. Exploration work
completed by Corex up to the date of this report includes 1:5,000 scale geologic
mapping, reconnaissance rock chip geochemical sampling, and roadcut sampling as
summarized in Table 12.1.
Table 12.1. Exploration Activities Summary
Exploration Activity Units Amount

Detailed Geologic Mapping 1:5,000 hectares 375
Rock Chip Sampling samples 457
Roadcut and Channel Sampling meters In progress
12.1 Geologic Mapping, Geochemical/Mineralogical Sampling
Geologic mapping at scale 1:5,000 has been completed only for the south central
portion of the project area, as discussed in Item 9 of this report and illustrated in
Figure 9.2. Reconnaissance rock chip sampling has been conducted of the central
portion of the project area, including areas with the highest concentrations of known
gold occurrences and historic mine workings. Samples were analyzed by an
independent international laboratory, ALS Chemex. Results are presented in
Appendix A. Details of the sampling program are presented in Item 14 of this report.
13 DRILLING
Corex has not conducted exploration drilling at the project. The only known drilling
activity at the project is that conducted by Cambior Exploration in 1997 and 1998 as
discussed in Item 8 of this report. This data is not available to the author.
14 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH
14.1 Sampling Method, Nature, and Spacing
14.1.1 Surface Rock Chip Samples

Concurrent with geologic mapping, project geologists collected surface rock chip
samples of outcropping zones of altered and mineralized rock. During the initial
reconnaissance evaluations of the project, Alan Hitchborn, Vice President
Exploration, Corex Gold Corporation, participated in sampling programs, but the
currently ongoing detailed rock chip sampling program is conducted by geologists in
the employ of Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV. To the date of this
report, 457 rock chip samples have been collected and analyzed. The objective of
the sampling was to characterize the mineral deposit type(s) and to define zones of
gold enrichment within the identified alteration zones. Surface sample locations were
selected to be representative of the geologic feature being investigated.
Representative spot samples and continuous channel samples are collected.
Channel samples are obtained by chipping and collecting rock along a line
perpendicular to the orientation of the structure or feature being sampled. Channel
samples collected are normally 2m in length. All samples were collected by hand,
using hardened steel chisels, picks, and geological hammers. Samples were placed
in 10” x 14” cloth drawstring sample bags. Sample weights varied from 4.5 to 7.5 kg.
Sample spacing was variable, and was a function of exposure of mineralized or
altered rock. Sample numeration was in ascending order, using sample numbers
and sample tags provided by the analytical laboratory. Sample locations were
marked in the field with fluorescent plastic flagging and aluminum tags. Sample
descriptions, location data, and multi-element assay data were captured in digital
format for importation into map generation and interpretation software applications.
14.2 Recovery Factors
No factors were identified that materially impact the accuracy or reliability of the
sample results. Surface rock chip samples were collected manually and recovery
was 100%.
14.3 Sample Quality and Representativity
In the opinion of the author, samples collected are of high quality and representative
of the mineralized areas being evaluated.
Surface sample locations were selected to be representative of the geologic feature

being investigated. Continuous channel sample was collected by chipping and
collecting rock along a line perpendicular to the orientation of the structure or feature
being sampled (Figure 14.1). Industry standard methods and best professional
judgment were used in collection of the rock chip samples, however, by nature,
manually collected rock chip samples are of lesser quality than mechanically
collected continuous samples (i.e. cored or cut samples). The surface rock chip
samples are of sufficient quality and confidence to be used for preliminary
assessments of the project’s mineral potential.

Figure 14.1. Geologist J Medina conducting channel sampling of road cuts, Cabeza Blanca
area.
14.4 Sample Interval Parameters
Regular sample intervals of 2.0 were used for most channel samples. Samples
collected of veins and mineralized structures varied from 0.4 to 2.0 meters width in
accordance with the width of the features being sampled.
15 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY
It is the author’s opinion that sample preparation, security, and analytical procedures
used were adequate to insure the integrity and reliability of the sample data base.
15.1 Personnel
Surface rock chip samples were collected by project geologists and technicians
employed by Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV. Alan Hitchborn, Vice
President Exploration of Corex Resource, participated in the earliest phases of
reconnaissance sampling at the project, and conducts on site reviews of the
exploration program, but neither he nor other employees, officers, directors, or
associates of Corex are directly involved in the ongoing detailed surface sampling
program.
15.2 Corex Resource Sampling Program
15.2.1 Sample Security/Chain of Custody

Geologic descriptions of the sample, including nature of the sample, length of

sample, lithology, alteration, and mineralization, were captured in geologic field
books. Samples were sealed in cloth drawstring bags. Sample identification tags
were placed with each sample in the sample bag, and a matching tag was retained
in a sample book. Samples were stored on site in a warehouse at Rancho Cerro
Prieto. Upon leaving the project, the samples were carried by RGM personnel to
Hermosillo, Sonora, where they were delivered directly to a receiving and
preparation facility of ALS Chemex.
15.2.2 Sample Preparation by ALS Chemex
Analytical work was performed by ALS Chemex, an ISO 9001:2000 certified

international provider of analytical services to mining and exploration companies.
Sample preparation was conducted at the ALS Chemex facility in Hermosillo,
Sonora. Analyses were performed at their Vancouver, British Columbia, laboratory.
Each sample was dried and the entire sample was crushed to better than 70%
passing a 2 mm (Tyler 10 mesh) screen. Using a riffle splitter, a split of up to 250
grams was taken and pulverized to better than 85% passing a 75 micron (Tyler 200
mesh) screen.
15.2.3 Analytical Techniques used by ALS Chemex
Gold content was first analyzed utilizing standard fire assay fusion of a 50 gram
charge, followed by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). For those samples that
yielded assays greater than 10,000 ppb Au (or 10 gpt Au), the sample was assayed
again utilizing standard fire assay fusion, followed by gravimetric analysis. The two
methods and their detection and upper limits are described below.
Metal: Gold
Sample Decomposition: Fire Assay Fusion
Analytical Method: Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)
A prepared sample is fused with a mixture of lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax,
silica and other reagents as required, inquarted with 6 mg of gold-free silver and
then cupelled to yield a precious metal bead.
The bead is digested for ½ hour in dilute nitric acid. Hydrochloric acid is then added
and the solution is digested for an additional hour. The digested solution is cooled,
diluted to 7.5 ml with demineralized water, homogenized and then analyzed by
atomic absorption spectrometry. The detection limit is 5 ppb (.005 gpt) and the
upper limit is 10,000 ppb (10 gpt).
Metal: Gold
Sample Decomposition: Fire Assay Fusion
Analytical Method: Gravimetric

A prepared sample is fused with a mixture of lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax,
silica and other reagents in order to produce a lead button. The lead button
containing the precious metals is cupelled to remove the lead. The remaining gold
and silver bead is parted in dilute nitric acid, annealed and weighed as gold. Silver,
if requested, is then determined by the difference in weights. Optionally, blanks with
known silver and gold content can be assayed at the same time to determine the
correction factor for silver loss in the fusion and cupellation. The detection limit is 50
ppb (.05 gpt) and the upper limit is 1,000 gpt.
All other elements listed below were analyzed utilizing Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP - AES) methods. The method and the detection
and upper limits for each element are described in Table 15.1 below.
Sample Decomposition: Nitric Aqua Regia Digestion

Analytical Method: Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission
Spectroscopy (ICP - AES)
A prepared sample (0.50 grams) is digested with aqua regia for at least one hour in
a hot water bath. After cooling, the resulting solution is diluted to 12.5 ml with
demineralized water, mixed and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectrometry. The analytical results are corrected for inter-element
spectral interferences.

Table 15.1. Elements Analyzed and Analytical Limits.
Detection Upper
Element Symbol Limit Limit
* Aluminum Al 0.01% 15 %
Antimony Sb 2 ppm 1%
Arsenic As 2 ppm 1%
* Barium Ba 10 ppm 1%
* Beryllium Be 0.5 ppm 0.01 %
Bismuth Bi 2 ppm 1%
Cadmium Cd 0.5 ppm 0.05 %
* Calcium Ca 0.01% 15 %
* Chromium Cr 1 ppm 1%
Cobalt Co 1 ppm 1%
Copper Cu 1 ppm 1%
* Gallium Ga 10 ppm 1%
Iron Fe 0.01% 15 %
* Lanthanum La 10 ppm 1%
Lead Pb 2 ppm 1%
* Magnesium Mg 0.01% 15 %
Manganese Mn 5 ppm 1%
Mercury Hg 1 ppm 1%
Molybdenum Mo 1 ppm 1%
Nickel Ni 1 ppm 1%
Phosphorus P 10 ppm 1%
* Potassium K 0.01% 10 %
* Scandium Sc 1 ppm 1%
Silver Ag 0.2 ppm 0.01 %
* Sodium Na 0.01% 10 %
* Strontium Sr 1 ppm 1%
Sulfur S 0.01 % 10 %
* Thallium Tl 10 ppm 1%
* Titanium Ti 0.01% 10 %
* Tungsten W 10 ppm 1%
Uranium U 10 ppm 1%
Vanadium V 1 ppm 1%
Zinc Zn 2 ppm 1%
*Elements for which the digestion is possibly incomplete.

16 DATA VERIFICATION
16.1 Prior Campaigns
No data is available from exploration campaigns conducted prior to Corex’s

involvement with the project.
16.2 Corex Exploration Campaign, 2006 to 2007
16.2.1 Rock Chip Sample Assays
All rock chip samples have been provided by ALS Chemex, an ISO 9001:2000
certified international provider of analytical services. ALS Chemex analytical
protocol includes industry standard QA/QC practices. Key components of the
QA/QC program are systematic insertion into the sample stream of blank, standard,
and duplicate samples.
Matthew D Gray obtained original assay certificates directly from ALS Chemex and
cross checked the project database against these original certified assay sheets to
verify the integrity of the database. M Gray reviewed original data sheets for blank,
duplicate, and standard samples analysed with the Caliche samples. Results
confirm that the analytical results of the rock chip sampling program are reliable and
suitable for exploration purposes.
As part of the field review, M Gray located sample sites in the field and collected 6
rock chip samples from sites previously sampled. Where the original sample was a
true channel sample, Gray collected a duplicate sample along the same sampling
cut. For the remaining cases the original samples were representative samples of
specific features thus Gray collected a representative sample of the same feature
but not at exactly the same location as the original sample. Gray collected the
verification samples and maintained control of the samples up until their delivery to
the ALS Chemex facility in Hermosillo, Sonora. The check sampling confirmed the
results of earlier sampling, and are summarized in Table 16.1.

Table 16.1. Check sample comparison table.

Original Au M Gray Au
Sample ppm Description Original Sample Sample ppm Comments
4 meters with 4 Qtz vein + black mineral of 20‐30 cm
wide, breccia Qtz vein, cavities after fragments?.
Few Hematite patches, gray‐dark gray Qtz . Trend
NW45/70‐60. Patches of silica , & moderate argillic M Gray sample representative
B14160 5.76 overprinting to phyllic. C302401 5.15 across 4m
350‐50, 2.0 m wide braccia with patches of gray M Gray sample across 1.5m
CA035 2.37 silice+ qtz veinlets, hematite pervasive,MnOx C302402 1.42 silicified breccia vein
70 cm of sample, including whithish‐grayish Qtz
veining (NW35/75 general trend ) with weak‐
moderate hematite +<< limonite in traces, black
mineral traces +<<MnOx in fractures hosted in KfPQ M Gray sample across 0.5m of
B14385 7.51 rock with weak‐moderate phyllic & weak propylitic C302403 1.90 quartz veined zone
Buena Suerte STR projection: NW30/80. Strong to
moderate grayish‐whitish Qtz & Qtz + Black mineral
+ Hematite (zoning black mineral ? Qtz + Hematite ? M Gray sample across 1m of
Qtz) stockwork & breccia. Strong fracturing, also wallrock to Buena Suerte vein,
B14089 2.79 drussy Qtz stockwork & Hem + <Qtz stockwork. C302404 3.15 silicified red siltstone
M Gray sample across 1m of
Weak breccia and Qtz + Black mineral veining, faul brecciated quartz‐sericite altered
surface NW30/65, hosted in strong to moderate granodiorite with earthy dark Fe‐
B14056 12.05 silicified gray PQP withPyOx traces. Channel sample C302405 4.11 oxides
KFPQ with moderate silicification, weak to moderate
grayish & whitish <1‐2 mm Qtz stockwork with M Gray sample across 1m of
Hematite halos or c/fractures, weak phyllic, sericite altered granodiorite with <
B14192 0.471 stockwork with trend Nw10‐40 & NE30, PyOx ~1%. C302406 1.35 1% diss Fe‐oxide after sulfide
17 ADJACENT PROPERTIES
No information is available regarding adjacent properties.
18 METALLURGICAL TESTING
No metallurgical studies were conducted.
19 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Data is insufficient to permit estimation of a mineral resource.
20 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
As discussed in Item 8 of this report, Cambior Exploration conducted an exploration

drilling program at the project in 1997. Matthew D. Gray has personal knowledge of
the results gained during his employment with Cambior in Mexico at the time the drill
campaign was conducted. Summaries of their drill results were reviewed by the
Matthew D. Gray as discussed in Item 8 of this report, however the original assay

certificates, field maps, notes, and reports were not available to the him, thus this
data is not further considered in this report and does not form the basis of any
conclusions or interpretations contained herein.
21 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS
The Caliche project is prospective for low sulfidation, epithermal gold-silver deposits,
and intrusive-related precious metal and polymetallic deposits. The project hosts
structurally controlled zones of gold-silver mineralization hosted by diorite,
granodiorite, siltstone, and arenite. These mineralized zones form potentially bulk
minable stockworks, and planar, mineralized structures or veins. Reconnaissance
mapping and geochemical sampling of the property shows that the system was
capable of creating mineralized zones of economically significant grade and the
exposed areal extent of the system is in excess of 6 km2 . The dominant structural
controls are NA330 to 350 (NW-SE) and NA030 to 260 (NE-SW) high angle
structural zones that are variably brecciated, silicified, and quartz veined. Gold
concentrations are localized within discrete structural zones and within broader
zones of parallel structures, brecciation and/or stockwork quartz veining. The
reconnaissance evaluation of the project by the author validated that the project is
prospective for three target types:
1) Stockwork and/or disseminated zones of gold-silver mineralization, mineable

by open pit or bulk underground methods.
2) High grade, planar, precious- and base-metal mineralized structural zones or
veins.
3) Concealed, intrusive related precious metal deposits.
Examples of target type 1 include the Las Abejas-Veta de Oro, La Muñeca-La

Leona, and Los Japoneses-Los Cuervos areas, where pervasively sericitized, pyritic
(now oxidized), and stockwork quartz veined siltstone, arenite, and granodiorite are
gold mineralized as described in Item 11.2 of this report. Surface sampling of these
pervasively altered and/or stockwork veined zones demonstrates that in places they
host significant concentrations of gold, ranging from 0.5 to 1.4 gpt. The size and
continuity of these mineralized zones cannot be determined by surface mapping and
sampling.
Examples of target type 2 include the all of the epithermal veins identified at the
project, including those described in Item 11.2 of this report. Reconnaissance
sampling of these veins has yielded as much as 13.2 gpt Au over widths of 1m, and
8.0 gpt Au over widths of 2 meters. The textures observed at present levels of
exposure are consistent with those of the uppermost levels of epithermal vein
systems, therefore significant depth extensions to the veins may be reasonably
inferred to exist, and targets analogous to the high grade ore shoots being defined at
the nearby Mercedes project, as discussed in Item 10 of this report, should be
considered.

Target type 3 is speculative and no examples of such are seen at surface. Its
possible existence is suggested by the presence of alteration assemblages typical of
intrusive related systems and by the Mo-As geochemical associations. The sericite-
pyrite-silica assemblage and the chlorite assemblage observed at Caliche may be
analogous to the phyllic and propylitic alteration zones associated with many
intrusive related deposits, and the Mo-As geochemical association is consistent with
relatively high temperature hydrothermal events associated with intrusive activity.
Calcareous sedimentary strata are present in the project area thus the project may
also be considered prospective for skarn deposits. These hypothesized targets
would be expected to occur below the presently exposed level of the system, thus
testing of this hypothesis would require drill testing to depths of greater than 150m
below current exposures.
The identified mineral showings at Caliche are consistent with those seen at low
sulfidation epithermal mineralized systems elsewhere in the Sierra Madre and
Altiplano provinces of Mexico. These systems may form economic deposits
mineable by underground or bulk surface methods. Deposits may be in the form of
mineralized structural zones with vertical ranges of 200 to 700m and strike lengths
ranging from hundreds of meters to in excess of 1 kilometer (Albinson et al., 2001),
or as zones of stockwork or disseminated mineralization localized by structures or
lithology. The Caliche project is prospective for both types of deposits. Additional
surface geologic and geochemical studies, followed by drilling, are required to
determine the size and grade of the mineralized zones at the Caliche project.
22 RECOMMENDATIONS
22.1 Exploration Recommendations
Reconnaissance evaluation of the Caliche project has demonstrated that it is

prospective for both bulk mineable precious metal deposits and high grade precious
metal veins. Styles of mineralization compatible with bulk mineable or disseminated
gold deposits have been identified, and assay data confirms that these zones are
auriferous, however the existing data is insufficient to determine the extent and
metal content of these zones. Numerous mineralized structures have been identified
that are analogous to economically important deposits exploited by present or past-
producing mines elsewhere in Mexico. Sampling of the mineralized zones identified
at Caliche in outcrop confirms that they host economically significant amounts of
precious metals. Data thus far obtained however is not sufficient to demonstrate the
continuity of mineralized zones or the grade distribution within them.
Work completed to date has identified drill targets meritorious of evaluation, but most
of the 6 km2 area of known gold occurrence has thus far not been mapped or
sampled in detail, thus additional geologic and geochemical surveys are necessary
to prioritize drill targets and identify additional areas of interest. The large size of the
mineralized system mandates that the initial drill program include sufficient meters to
allow for testing of numerous targets distributed throughout the system. In order to

determine the economic potential of the project, a multi-stage exploration program is

recommended, with each successive stage conditional upon results obtained from
the previous. Stage 1 consists of geologic mapping and geochemical surveys to
define initial drill targets. The second stage entails drill testing of targets identified in
Stage 1. The first phase of drilling encompasses 4,000m of reverse circulation
drilling of multiple targets at the project, and if results are positive, would be followed
by an additional 8,000m of reverse circulation drilling to further test the targets
developed. The total cost for the first phase of the proposed program which
encompasses geologic and geochemical surveys sufficient to identify drill targets, is
estimated at $269,000 USD. The drilling phase costs are estimated at $468,000
USD for the first 4,000m, and an additional $870,000 USD for the contingent
8,000m, for a total program cost of $1.6M USD as summarized in the budget
presented as Table 22.1 below.

Table 22.1. Recommended Work Plan and Budget, Caliche Project

MAPPING/SAMPLING AND DRILL TARGET DEFINITION PROGRAM
Item Units Unit Cost Total Cost
Camp/Hotel/Meals/Fuel 6 months 5,250 31,500
Assays - rock chip and
trenches 1000 samples 30 30,000
Contract Geologic Services 6 months 17,000 102,000
Samplers 6 months 2,000 12,000
Vehicles (3) 6 months 3,000 18,000
Surveying 1 5,000 5,000
Field Supplies 1 5,000 5,000
Travel Costs 1 10,000 10,000
Permits 1 permit 10,000 10,000
Earthworks - Roads,
Trenches 1 30,000 30,000
Reclamation 1 15,000 15,000
Total $268,500
DRILLING PROGRAM
Item Units Unit Cost Total Cost
Phase 1
Camp/Hotel/Meals/Fuel 1.5 months 5,250 7,875
Contract Geologic Services 1.5 months 17,000 25,500
Samplers 1.5 months 2,000 3,000
Vehicles (3) 1.5 months 3,000 4,500
Surveying 1 3,000 3,000
Travel Costs 1 3,000 3,000
Earthworks - Roads,
Trenches, Drill Pads 1 25,000 25,000
Mobilization/Demobilization 1 10,000 10,000
RC Drilling - Initial Testing 4000 meters 70 280,000
Assays - drilling 2400 samples 30 72,000
Subtotal 467,875
Phase 2
Camp/Hotel/Meals/Fuel 2.5 months 5,000 12,500
Contract Geologic Services 2.5 months 17,000 42,500
Samplers 2.5 months 2,000 5,000
Vehicles (3) 2.5 months 3,000 7,500
Surveying 1 5,000 5,000
Travel Costs 1 7,000 7,000
Earthworks - Roads,
Trenches, Drill Pads 1 35,000 35,000
RC Drilling - Follow Up 8000 meters 70 560,000
Assays - drilling 4800 samples 30 144,000
Subtotal 869,500
Total $1,337,375
Grand Total $1,605,875

22.2 Recommendations for Field Procedures and QA and QC Protocols for

Future Drill Programs
The data collection and QA/QC policies implemented by Corex are appropriate for
an early stage exploration program. The protocols employed were satisfactory for
verifying the integrity and quality of the surface rock chip sample and analytical
database for exploration purposes, however, as the project advances to drill testing,
some changes to field practices and QA/QC policies are recommended as
summarized below.
- Topographic maps published by INEGI, a Mexican Federal Agency have

been used as the map base for the project. The maps are created at
50,000 scale with 20m contour intervals. Improved topographic control
will be helpful for correctly determining orientation, morphology, and size
of mineralized zones, and improved topographic control would be required
for resource estimation. Photogrammetric surveys should be completed to
allow creation of topographic base maps with contour intervals of 1m.
- Downhole surveys should be completed on all drillholes and drillhole
collars should be surveyed by precision methods.
- Certified blank samples inserted by Corex should be utilized in drilling
programs.
- Certified blank material should be prepared and verified by round robin
testing of multiple samples of a homogenized bulk sample, and the bulk
sample should be of sufficient size such that a consistent source of blank
material will be available throughout the drill program.
- Blank samples should not be inserted at regular intervals, rather they
should be irregularly inserted in zones of suspected elevated metal
concentrations.
- The project operator should submit duplicate samples to the primary
assay lab at a ratio of 1 duplicate per 15 or 20 samples. Duplicates
should be equal sized splits of reverse circulation cuttings or split core.
- Duplicates should be submitted to the secondary (check assay) lab at a
ratio of 1 duplicate per 20 samples. Duplicates should be equal sized
splits of reverse circulation cuttings or split core.
- The project operator should initiate the practice of submitting certified
standards of different grades at a ratio of 1 standard per 20 samples.
- A secured access warehouse should be constructed on site and used for
sample storage prior to delivery of samples to the analytical lab.

23 REFERENCES
Albinson, T., Norman, D., Cole, D., and Chomiak, B., 2001, Controls on formation of
low-sulfidation epithermal deposits in Mexico: Constraints from fluid inclusion and
stable isotope data: in New Mines and Mineral Discoveries in Mexico and Central
America, Special Publication Number 8 of the Society of Economic Geologists, p. 1 -
32.
Berger, B.R., and Henley, R.W., 1989, Advances in the understanding of epithermal
gold silver deposits with special reference to the western United States: in The
Geology of Gold Deposits: the Perspective in 1988, Economic Geology Monograph
6, Keays, W.R., Ramsey, W.R.H., and Groves, D.I., editors, The Society of
Economic Geologists.
Bonham, H.F. Jr., 1988, Models for volcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal
deposits: in Bulk minable precious metal deposits of the western United States
Symposium Proceedings, Schafer, R.W., Cooper, J.J., and Vikre, P.G. editors,
Geological Society of Nevada.
Buchanan, L.J., 1981, Precious metal deposits associated with volcanic

environments in the southwest: in Relation of tectonics to ore deposits in the
Southern Cordillera, Dickenson, W.R., and Payne, W.D., editors, Arizona Geological
Society Digest, vol.14.
Consejo de Recursos Minerales, 1992, Monografia Geologico-Minera del Estado de

Sonora, Publicacion M-8e, Secretaria de Energia, Minas y Industria Paraestatal,
Subsecretaria de Minas, Mexico.
Hayba, D.O., Bethke, P.M., Heald, P., and Foley, N.K., 1985: Geologic, mineralogic,
and geochemical characteristics of volcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal
deposits. Reviews in Economic Geology v. 2 p. 129-167.
Heald, P., Foley, N.K., and Hayba, D.O., 1987: Comparative anatomy of volcanic-
hosted epithermal deposits: acid-sulfate and adularia-sericite types. Economic
Geology v. 82 p. 1-26.
Kern, R.R., and Sibthorpe, R.A., 2005, NI43-101 technical report on the Santa
Gertrudis, Sonora, Mexico, Technical Report Sonora Gold Corporation 21
September 2005.
Meridian Gold Inc., 2007, First quarter 2007 financial results and exploration update,
document available through System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(SEDAR).

Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 1999, Carta Geologico-Minera Saracachi H12’B72

Sonora, Escala 1:50,000.

24 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION
I, Matthew Dean Gray, of Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, do hereby certify:
1. That I am employed as a geologist at Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de

CV (RGM), an independent consulting geosciences firm, whose address is Calle
14 de Abril No. 68, Colonia San Benito, Hermosillo, Sonora, CP 83190, MEXICO.
2. That: a.) I am a Certified Professional Geologist (#10688) with the American

Institute of Professional Geologists; b.) My qualifications include experience
applicable to the subject matter of this report; and c.) I am a “Qualified Person”
for the purposes of CSA National Instrument 43-101.
3. That I am a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines (Ph.D., Geology with

Minor in Mineral Economics, 1994; B.Sc., Geological Engineering, 1985) and the
University of Arizona (M.Sc., Geosciences, 1988) and that I have practiced my
profession continuously since 1988.
4. That I have no material interest, direct or indirect, in the property discussed in

this report titled “Summary Report on the Caliche Project, Municipio of Cucurpe,
Sonora, Mexico, Prepared for Corex Gold Corporation by Matthew D. Gray,
Ph.D., C.P.G. #10688, Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV, Dated 31
July 2007” or in the securities of Corex Gold Corporation or Corex Global SA de
CV.
5. That I am independent of Corex Gold Corporation and Corex Global SA de CV

as per definition 1.4 of CSA NI43-101.
6. That I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the
subject matter of this technical report which is not reflected in the technical report
and which the omission to disclose makes the technical report misleading.
7. That this report on the Caliche project, titled “Summary Report on the Caliche
Project, Municipio of Cucurpe, Sonora, Mexico, Prepared for Corex Gold
Corporation by Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. #10688, Resource Geosciences
de Mexico SA de CV, Dated 31 July 2007” is based on a site visit to the Caliche
project in July 2007, and on a review of published and unpublished information
and that I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of
this report beyond that disclosed in Items 4 and 8 of this report.
8. That I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101 and that this
technical report has been prepared in compliance with the Instrument and Form
and that I am responsible for the compilation of this report in its entirety.
9. That I consent to the use of this report, titled “Summary Report on the Caliche
Project, Municipio of Cucurpe, Sonora, Mexico, Prepared for Corex Gold

APPENDIX A. ROCK CHIP SAMPLE ASSAYS

Coordinates WGS84 G730 All concentrations reported in ppm
Sample UTM E UTM N Description Au Ag Cu Pb Zn As Mo Sb
scarce micro Qtz veinlets,
hematirte ‐ limonite in
CA‐003 536254 3366785 fractures hosted by silstone 0.010 5 15 57 228 26 3 4
micro breccia cemented by
silice ‐ qtz, drussy qtz veinlets,
weak oxidation, hosted by
CA‐004 536272 3366806 rhyolite 0.126 29 8 77 69 31 1 7
200‐75 drussy Qtz + milky Qtz
stockwork, hematite pervasive
mainly controlled by fracture,
CA‐005 536708 3365365 hosted by silicified sandstone 1.010 11 25 109 60 9 4 11
1.3 m wide, 10‐ 85 vein,
bandde textue, silice breccia +
drussy qtz+ MnOx, hosted by
CA‐006 536842 3365176 oxidized sandstone 2.650 73 133 2650 2620 21 6 11
350‐80, 1.0 m wide, banded
Qtz veinlets + drussy qtz, weak
CA‐007 535995 3365335 oxidation hosted by sandstone 4.850 12 196 2770 291 31 8 6
320‐85,multi ‐ stage Qtz vein,
bandded textute+ braccia, gray
CA‐008 538158 3365554 silica 2.920 135 37 13600 1690 16 4 10
320‐85,multi ‐ stage Qtz vein,
bandded textute+ braccia, gray
CA‐009 538143 3365577 silica 1.825 186 71 4550 2320 9 2 12
hematite ‐ limonite pervasive
in alted silstone, scarce micro
qtz veinlets, footwall of Abel
CA‐010 538122 3365587 structure 0.033 3 52 68 75 5 3 14
Qtz ‐ Feld fine grain rock, micro
qtz veinlets, drussy qtz and
weak gray silica, fine Py
disseminate, limonite+
CA‐011 538173 3365668 Jarosite+ hematite in fractures 0.079 4 31 479 220 55 6 4
silstone ‐hornfel, drussy qtz
stockwork, very weak
CA‐012 538312 3365743 oxidation 0.034 2 15 68 198 32 3 8
340‐70, 1.0 m wide shaering
CA‐013 538452 3365453 zone controlling qtz veinlents 0.431 1 80 735 686 48 2 6
320‐85, 22.0 m wide, multi ‐
stage Qtz vein, bandded
CA‐014 537896 3365442 textute+ braccia, gray silica 8.000 92 139 2960 1960 22 14 9
dump sample; 350 ‐ 75, multi
stage Qtz vein, bandding
CA‐015 538015 3365022 texture, silce gray 1.715 133 235 15800 3320 179 4 16
Dump sample, 345‐80, ‐1.0 m
wide Qtz vein, gray silica,
drussy qtz, qtz breccis, silce +
pyOx and oxides in fractures
CA‐019 536892 3364831 structure 11.950 60 312 2810 2190 26 2 8
footwall, micro drussy qtz
veinl;ets, 320 ‐ 75 structure,
CA‐020 536832 3364612 hosted by weak oxidized ‐ 0.095 10 59 549 458 5 2 8

sericitized Feld + Qtz rock
Dump sample; 350 ‐ 70
Qtz+PyOx boxwork, calcite
reemplaced by silice, fine fresh
CA‐021 536834 3364686 Py and Ag sulfosalt? 4.660 65 130 1610 1000 30 7 18
Footwall Japoneses vein; 320‐
65, 1.0 m wide fracture zone
controlling qtz veinlets,
hematite in fractures hosted in
CA‐022 536843 3365101 altered sandstone 3.330 82 34 836 553 37 7 13
Japonese hanging wall, silstone
‐ sandstone limonite in
fractures, micro qtz
CA‐023 537019 3365456 veinlets+PyOx 0.146 1 19 43 76 7 2 7
340‐70, 2 m wide structure, qtz
veinlets, hematite ‐ limonite in
CA‐024 537143 3365558 fractures and pervasive 7.530 89 255 2130 1940 89 14 14
340‐60, 1.5 to 3.0 m wide
brecciate zone controlling qtz
veinlets+silce‐Hematite‐
CA‐025 536967 3364878 MnOx= 3.410 75 178 1810 1710 31 9 12
2.0 m wide stockwork, milky
and drussy qtz + gray silica,
hematite ‐ limonite ‐ MnOx in
CA‐026 536957 3364949 fractures 1.000 11 206 4320 1430 18 12 12
320‐75 structure hosted by
altered calcareos silstone; qtz +
silive veinlets, Hematite ‐
limonite and MnOx in
CA‐028 537170 3365610 fractures, later calcite veinlets 0.404 126 55 1040 3280 61 31 20
330‐55, 1.0 m wide structure,
milky qtz+drussy qtz and silica
breccia with hematite ‐ MnOx
CA‐029 537076 3365777 in fractures 0.908 30 391 2760 7290 141 12 11
330 ‐ 65, 1.5 m wide structure,
multi stage silice events, gray
silica, breccias, drussy qtz
stockwork, hematite ‐ MnOx in
fractures, later dark calcite
CA‐030 536982 3365864 veinlets 0.520 52 292 3150 14700 74 25 7
Dump sample: silsice +
MnOx+dark calcite+ gray
silice+ Hematite ‐ limonite in
fractures, Multi stage silice
CA‐031 536888 3365957 events 4.440 202 716 30600 12800 128 12 15
160‐85, ‐1.0 m wide, banding
qtz vein, drussy and milky qtz
CA‐032 536607 3365790 with patches of gray silice 3.460 99 155 3690 1770 15 10 11
355‐80, 1.0 m wide vein, gray
silica+Py, drussy qtz, hematite
CA‐033 536016 3365189 in fractures 5.850 104 418 6300 3060 48 8 9
Qtz vein, banding texsture, qtz
and gray silice+ drussy qtz, Py
CA‐034 536016 3365176 boxwork. 0.743 12 253 3780 1210 14 2 19
350‐50, 2.0 m wide braccia
CA‐035 536057 3364677 with patches of gray silice+ qtz 2.370 12 609 9960 3970 914 217 9

veinlets, hematite
pervasive,MnOx
~1 m breccia Qtz vein w‐trend
NW45° dipping 65°SW, weak
sericite, moderate Hem‐
Goethite and Limonite
CA‐040 536914 3363007 C/fractures 0.517 86 58 680 20 90 0 0
Dark gray siltstone with
moderate deformation
(folding), with moderate Lim‐
Goethite c/fractures, bedding
and foliation planes, weak
MnOx C/fractures, wk and
moderate oxidized sulfide + ‐‐
qtz stockwork crosscuting
CA‐041 537036 3362916 bedding. 0.008 2 49 10 110 70 0 0
Light gray‐gray siltstone‐shale
w/1‐2 mm Qtz stockwork, Lim
+ ‐MnOx + ‐Hem‐Goethite
c/fractures, selective oxidation
after epigenetic Py?, weak
CA‐042 536668 3362906 silicification + sericite patches. 0.009 9 32 40 710 30 0 0
Strong silicification, coarse
grain sandstone and fine grain
sedimentary breccia (5‐10 mm
subangular grains or
fragments) or aglomerate
relict, weak brecciate w/Qtz
cement, wk late? 1 mm Qtz
stockwork crosscuting
silicification, sericite traces, Qtz
CA‐043 536630 3362923 + ‐ 0.012 0 6 60 30 30 0 0
Drussy Qtz vein, with silver in
sulfosalts (black soft mineral),
mod Hem‐‐Lim as patches &
c/fract, fresh Py tr. Qtz vein
hosted in poorly‐mod sorted
arkosic sandstone & weak
B14003 536685 3363573 silcified. Trend of STR SE10/70 0.866 10 102 950 790 20 0 0
Moderate 1‐2 mm Qtz +
Goeth‐‐Lim stocwork, weak &
moderate silcified patches,
sericite? traces, hosted in shale
with few interbedding of fine
grain sandstone. Stocwork
trend NW20‐40/80 & NE40‐
B14004 536759 3363586 50/70‐80 0.088 1 8 190 370 0 0 0
Strong silicification, NE45 &
NW50 main Qtz stocwork
trend, black mineral patches
with 3‐5% of sulfosalt (?), fresh
Py traces, hosted in shale,
mod‐weak content of Goeth‐
B14005 536798 3363621 Lim & ‐‐Hem c/fract. 0.070 4 12 50 70 40 0 0
Moderate Qtz stocwork (Qtz +
B14006 536797 3363675 Hem + Lim), moderate 0.047 1 5 30 40 30 0 0

silicification near to fault
(NW15/75‐80, hosted in fine
grain arkosic (?) sandstone
Dump sample, Hem and Lim
c/fract., weal brecciate fine
grain sandstone or siltstone,
fragment supported breccia,
drussy Qtz with black mineral,
and also white Qtz veinlets, as
well as, Qtz + oxidized sulfide
(to Lim) veinlet. STR trend
B14008 537116 3363800 NW30. 2.530 420 14 370 30 10 0 0
weak to moderate 1‐5 mm Qtz
+ ‐oxidized sulfide stocwork,
weak silicified siltstone (gray
color), also includes moderate
drussy Qtz stocwork. STR trend
B14009 537087 3363768 SW40‐30 0.096 6 5 80 20 40 25 0
Moderate silicified arkosic
sandstone, moderate to weak
Hem‐Lim c/fractures,
moderate 1‐15 mm Qtz + Hem
stocwork, Py disseminate ‐1%,
AsPy (?) tr, drussy Qtz
B14010 537363 3363112 crosscuting white Qtz stocwork 0.050 4 13 160 10 110 0 0
silicifed (in patches) sandstone
with fresh pyrite disseminated,
milky + drussy Qtz veinlets,
B14011 537352 3363071 weak oxidation in surface. 0.087 7 8 130 10 60 0 0
Weak 1‐3 mm Qtz stocwork,
drussy Qtz (open space), some
Qtz veinlets in bedding
planes,weak to mod. Hem‐
Goeth c/fract., wk MnOx
C/fract, siltstone interbedding
shale & fine grain sandstone
with weak silicification an
B14012 537296 3362911 sercite traces. 0.018 1 33 30 290 60 0 0
Weak brecciate arkosic
sandstone zone, 20 cm of
breccia Qtz vein, weak Lim‐‐
Hem, black‐dark blue (metallic
luster) with black‐dark brown
streak, weak malachite
patches, patches with Py
boxwork 1‐2%. STR trend
B14030 537414 3364884 NW30. 0.125 16 2420 950 870 20 0 10
Dump Sample: Cooper oxides
(malachita ‐ azurite), Hematite
‐ limonite in fractures, milky +
B14031 537413 3364887 drussy Qtz veinlets 0.625 265 24800 3930 1550 190 80 1370
315‐80, 1.0 m wide, milky Qtz +
gray silice with Pyrite +
B14032 537441 3364917 Galena+ Sphalerite. 0.466 41 356 3080 1360 0 55 20
Moderate Qtz & Hem + ‐Qtz
B14033 537440 3364919 stockwork (NW20), moderate 2.430 11 895 1090 680 20 27 190

Hem c/fract., malachite
traces,also black min. (MnOx)
c/fract, patches of phyllic
alteration. Hosted in pinkish‐
gray arkosic sandstone. 2 m
channel sample of wall rock.
Weak to mod Lim‐‐‐Hem
c/fract & in groundmass,
moderate argillic overprinting
to phyllic?, includes 10‐30 cm
of breccia STRucture
withsilicified & mod‐strong
Lim‐Hem‐‐Goeth + ‐Qtz as
cement, trend NE40‐50/50‐60.
Hosted in siltstone &
B14039 536610 3363597 sandstone. La India 0.050 12 20 150 120 90 0 0
Moderate Hem + ‐Qtz
stocwork with STR trend SE70
hosted in silstone and shale,
folded sequences, bull? Qtz
breccia, moderate Hem‐‐Lim
c/fract., weak silicification and
late argillic. Año nuevo old
B14040 536441 3363332 working 2.160 193 37 400 140 90 0 0
Weak Hem content c/fract &
moderate selective Hem in
groundmass, moderate 1‐10
mm grayish drussy Qtz + ‐
oxidized sulfide stockwork
mostly SE30/65 & ‐NW40/65,
sparse moderate phyllic
alteration in patches. Hosted in
medium grain pinkish/beige
B14041 536870 3365110 sandstone, 0.396 4 28 300 1050 0 0 0
Moderate irregular Qtz
stockwork, moderate to weak
phyllic alteration (Qtz + ‐‐ser),
moderate Hematite (after
sulfide?), weak clay
overprinting sericite. Sample
located on SW wall rock, STR
with fault surface NW20/65.
B14042 536853 3365128 Host rock arkosic sandstone 1.215 22 44 840 1340 0 6 0
20‐30 cm of breccia Qtz vein
(weak brecciate), & moderate ‐
15 mm Qtz + ‐Black sulfosalt?
Stocwork withtrend Nw20/70,
oxidized sulfide disseminate
~2%, mod Hem‐‐‐Lim in
groundmass. Poorly sorted and
folded arkosic sandstone
B14043 536839 3365146 (NE20/70) 1.130 20 93 1680 3010 0 0 0
Strong to mod Qtz + ‐black
mineral veining & 30 cm
withstrong Hem + ‐Qtz as
cement (‐10%) on bull Qtz,
B14044 536835 3365215 Japoneses STR projection, Qtz 3.530 21 55 2750 880 0 13 0

veining with trend NW20 & ‐
NW40/70‐75. Hosted in folded
slate or fine grain
metasediments sequence
(arkosic sandstone) w
Structure: NW50/65 (Fault) &
moderate silicification &
Hematite, sericite trace, on NE
wall rock with moderate argillic
(‐1‐1 m wide) overprinting
moderate phyllic (Qtz +
Sercite). Moderate Hem
content mostly in fractures and
B14045 536835 3365106 replacing sulfide or bioti 1.675 23 36 820 680 0 0 0
Structure:NW05/80, Grayihs
and beige rock (meddium grain
sandstone), moderate to weak
silicification, mod ‐1 mm gray
Qtz stockwork, weak Hem‐‐lim
c/fract.,sericite traces, weak
content of MnOx, biotite (?)
B14046 536809 3365149 alterated to Hem‐Lim. 1.580 28 28 750 680 0 0 0
Sample located in hanging wall
of Japoneses STR, with
moderate grayish &whitish fine
grain Qtz banding as
stockwork, weak to moderate
argillic, & wk patches of Qtz + ‐
sericite hosted in pinkish‐
B14047 536887 3365090 grayish arckosic sandstone. 0.196 3 12 170 1100 10 0 0
Los Japoneses projected STR
(NW25/60‐65). Banded Qtz +
Black sulfosal? + ‐Galena,
B14048 536902 3365073 moderate Hematite content. 2.080 77 120 3010 3190 0 31 0
Grayish PQP (Plagioclase‐‐Qtz
Porphyritic texture) with weak
to moderate Qtz + ‐Sericite
patches, patches of moderate
argillic, oxidized biotite? &
PyOx traces. Strong fracturing
B14049 536885 3365076 zone. 0.104 1 19 200 660 0 0 0
Beige‐‐reddish arkosic
sandstone (1 mm grain size
average) with weak to
moderate 1‐2 mm Qtz + ‐
Oxidized sulfide (to Hem)
stockwork, & PyOx? Diss ‐1%.
Folded sandstone with main
B14050 536920 3365080 trend NE60/20‐30. 0.126 2 12 70 200 0 0 0
Moderate ‐1mm Qtz + ‐Hem
stockwork (NW40/75 &, ‐SW25
& ‐SW10, with high angle
dipping 70‐80), moderate Hem
content in grdmass (selective,
after sulfide?) ~3%, patches of
B14051 536677 3365124 weak‐moderate silicification & 0.020 0 7 10 40 0 0 0

c/fract.,Sercite traces. Weak
bull Qtz. Hosted in gr
Reddish‐red Hematite stain
sandstone (arkosic) fine grain (‐
0.3 mm grain size). Oxidized
lithic (?) grains, weak to
moderate 2‐4 mm Qtz + ‐‐
Oxidized sulfide (to Hem), kind
of crackle breccia (30 cm wide)
with stockwork of drussy Qtz +
B14052 536659 3365056 Hem (Hem ? Qtz zon 0.026 0 19 10 40 100 0 0
Moderate Qtz + ‐acicular balck
mineral stockwork with main
trend Fault & trend NW30/75
& ‐SE35/65, weak Hem
content in fract, hosted in
B14053 536730 3365142 reddish arkosic? Sandstone. 0.040 0 0 0 20 0 0 0
Weak to moderate
silicification, weak brecciate
rock with bull? Qtz and banded
Qtz (Black mineral ? Qtz
zoning), and moderate content
of strong late? Hematite + ‐Lim
after sulfide. Trend SE50/80.
Hosted in medium grain
B14054 536711 3365242 arkosic sandstone. 0.155 2 5 140 140 0 0 10
Beige‐grayish medium grain (1
mm average) sandstone, PyOx
? Disseminate ‐1%, mod Qtz +
Hem + Black mineral (Black
mineral ? Qtz ? Hematite
zoning) in several trends but
mostly SE30/70, sporadic Qtz +
B14055 536732 3365187 ‐sericite patches. 0.018 0 5 50 80 0 0 10
Weak breccia and Qtz + Black
mineral veining, faul surface
NW30/65, hosted in strong to
moderate silicified gray PQP
withPyOx traces.Channel
B14056 536796 3365106 sample 12.050 12 123 1990 520 0 0 0
Moderate content of strong
Hematite c/fract, moderate
gray Qtz stocwork, & 20 cm of
weak Qtz breccia with fault
surface NW20/85, both sides
of wall rock with moderate‐
strong silicification, PyOx
traces. Moderate Qtz + ‐
sericite alteration. Lim tr.
B14057 536755 3365213 Hoste 0.267 3 8 450 380 0 0 0
Moderate Hematite‐‐Lim
c/fractures, weak grayish Qtz
veinlets, moderate argillc
(supergene?), weak phyllic
alteration (Qtz + Sericite),
B14058 536818 3365247 hosted in ‐1‐1 mm grain size 0.131 0 53 60 150 50 7 10

sandstone. Channel sample.
Strong fracturing and Fault
zone NE10° (same trend as
"bull
PQP with moderate Phyllic &
argillic overprinting, moderate
1‐4 mm Qtz + ‐Lim‐Hem (after
sulfide) crosscuting? "Bull Qtz".
B14059 536802 3365283 STR trend NW50°/80° 0.029 0 15 30 60 20 0 0
Crackle breccia with Hem + ‐
Qtz as cement, moderate 1‐3
mm banded Qtz (white &
grayish Qtz) & Qtz + ‐Black
mineral stockwork. Hosted in
strong to moderate silicified
PQP and phyllic patches.
Moderate content of Hem in
B14060 536818 3365302 fractures. 0.163 0 5 0 20 10 0 0
Moderate 1‐5 mm Qtz gray‐
grayish Qtz + ‐Lim (after Py?)
and Qtz + ‐Black mineral
stockwork (drussy Qtz), mostly
NW & SE30‐40, weak Hem
c/fract., PyOx diss ~2‐3%, weak
phyllic and silicification, as well
as, weak argillic, 0.5‐1.0 mm
B14061 536862 3365332 grain size sandstone 0.053 1 11 30 100 20 0 0
Weak grayish Qtz + ‐Hematite‐
Goethite (after sulfide)
stockwork & moderate whitish
"bull Qtz" with trend
NW25/70‐80, sporadic patches
of Qtz + sericite, & moderate
silicification, some places no
clear rock texture, Brownish
B14062 536868 3365227 and gray rock color). 2.640 73 101 220 240 0 0 0
Moderate phyllic alteration
(sericite + ‐‐Qtz), weak to
moderate 1‐5 mm grayish Qtz
+ ‐Hematite‐‐Limonite (after
sulfide) mostly withtrend
SE30/70, 0.5‐1.0 mm grain size
arkosic sandstone, weak
B14063 536869 3365210 supergene argillic 0.060 1 29 70 120 30 0 0
30 cm of Qtz + Hem‐‐‐Lim
(after sulfide) veining and Qtz +
‐Black mineral stockwork,
includes dark gray & white Qtz,
moderate silicification patches,
Sericite traces,PyOx ~1%, and
wall rock with moderate ‐1‐1
mm grayish Qtz stockwork.
B14064 536940 3365238 Hosted in 0.5‐1. 0.277 2 27 500 230 50 0 0
Moderate grayish, whitish and
bull Qtz stockowork with trend
B14065 536877 3365342 mostly SE50/70, including 20 1.355 33 44 570 550 10 0 0

cm of Qtz veining‐strong
silicification and mod‐strong
Lim &Hem (after sulfide),
sporadic unoxidized patches
with Py disseminate 2‐3% &
black sheetted black sulfid
Strong transparent and drussy
Qtz, weak Hematite in
groundmass & C/fract, PyOx ‐
1%, weak brecciate rock by
transparente Qtz veinlets,
whitish outcrop, NE30 main
stockowrk, strong silicified
B14066 536969 3365459 sandstone or rhyolitic dike?. 0.143 8 18 230 80 0 0 0
Strong silicified sandstone ?
(no clear texture), weak crackle
breccia, weak transparente Qtz
& Qtz +‐Hematite stockwork
B14067 536954 3365446 (main trend NW40, PyOx ~1%. 0.754 6 40 160 40 30 0 0
Moderate content of strong
Hematite, weak Qtz + sericite?
veinlets in fractures (mostly in
bedding planes or foliation),
moderate silicification patches
remnant, moderate to strong
argillic. Medium to fine grain
B14068 536948 3365478 sandstone texture remnant. 0.097 1 21 20 70 0 0 0
1.5 m sample, including 30 cm
of Qtz vein, hosted in
moderate silicified PQP & weak
B14069 536957 3365553 patches of phyllic alteration 2.360 41 60 1020 380 0 6 0
1.8 m sample with 30‐10 cm
gray to whitish Qtz + <Oxidized
sulfide + <black mineral
veining, patches of strong
argillic & moderate Hem
content. Also 50 cm of fault
displacement with trend
B14070 536942 3365599 NW10/60. 1.730 48 189 5050 2180 50 105 10
Moderate grayish‐whitish &
transparent‐light gray Qtz
stockwork, also "bull Qtz", and
amethyst Qtz, hosted in
moderate silicified PQP, mostly
of stockwork with trend
NW25/80 (as fault surface) &
few Qtz + Hematite (after
B14071 536967 3365526 sulfide) veining (1‐3 cm), wea 0.303 5 49 850 320 20 0 0
Moderate silicified <1 m wide
PQP, weak brecciate rock with
<5% of Hem infill, patches of
moderate Qtz + sericite
(phyllic), weak Qtz veinlets.
B14072 536820 3365452 Fault trend SE10/85. 0.098 1 13 140 110 0 0 0
1 m wide sample. 15‐20 cm
B14073 536778 3365555 with gray‐whitish Qtz vein 4.660 41 365 5100 1270 30 0 0

(NW40/80), rest of sample
with moderate Qtz + <Hem
stockwork, moderate silicified
PQP with Py diss <1% (<0.1 mm
crystals). Sericite traces.
Patches of late stage(?) Drussy
amethyst Qtz, weak black min
Moderate grayish‐transparent
& irregulat drussy Qtz +
<Hematite, moderate silicified
patches, Qtz + sericite
c/fractures, PyOx disseminate
~3%, traces of patches with un‐
oxidized Py. 0.5‐1 mm grain
size sandstone, moderate Lim‐
B14074 536711 3365536 Hem c/fract., patches of m 0.059 1 36 100 320 50 0 0
Moderate to strong whitish‐
grayish & transparent Qtz in
bedding planes, pervasive
replacing of probably tiny
bedded Limestone (<1‐2 cm
laminations) to whitish drussy
Qtz, and enclosing moderate
silicified fine grain sandstone &
B14075 537113 3365717 siltstone with moderate L 0.072 4 12 100 100 20 38 10
STR: NW25/55, weak brecciate
STR with~20% of Qtz, including
banded Qtz + Hem (Hem‐‐‐Qtz)
veining, and moderate
Hematite c/fractures. Includes
fragments of propylitic arkosic
sandstone, patches of
moderate argillic
(supergenic?), 1.6 wide
B14076 537073 3365786 sample. 2.020 32 451 3680 7490 150 26 0
Veta de Oro STR projection
(NW35/60 & <<NW60/70).
Sample incliding 10 cm of
breccia Qtz vein, moderate to
strong Qtz + Sericite in STR,
weak Lim + <Hem c/fractures,
moderate grayish Qtz + <Lim or
Hem (after sulfide) stockwork,
B14077 536932 3365932 hosted in coarse & <<fine 0.877 13 56 560 1090 10 0 0
Veta de Oro STR projection
(NW50/55). Weak brecciate &
20 cm as breccia Qtz vein (Qtz
40%) with grayihs‐<whitish &
white Qtz, moderate
overprinting phyllic patches to
weak Chlorite. Hosted in fine
grain sandstone & siltstone
sequence, weak Hem & <<Lim
B14078 536848 3366034 c 3.590 173 385 5000 5510 50 0 0
STR: NW‐SE/80‐90. 1 meter
sample. Including 30 cm of
B14079 536677 3366090 gray‐whitish drussy Qtz 0.785 22 95 3030 1390 30 0 0

veining, moderate phyllic and
weak Qtz stokcowork in SW
wall rock.
1.5 m wide of sampling,
indluding 20 cm with grayish‐
whitish to transparent Qtz
breccia vein, moderate
Hematite & black mineral,
drussy Qtz. STR trend:
NW10/85. Also includes
moderate Hem patches and
Qtz stockwork. Medium grain
B14080 536774 3365333 sandstone with weak to mo 0.819 8 20 600 750 0 0 0
1.7 m channel sample.
Moderate grayish & drussy Qtz
+ <late Hematite stockwork
(0.3‐3 cm veining), weak
content of moderate Hem
c/fract, hosted in moderate to
strong phyllic alteration (Qtz +
sericite) & PyOx (?)
disseminate ~2‐3% alterated to
B14081 536803 3365362 Hem or Li 1.230 26 24 840 440 10 0 0
Weak Hem in groundmass,
weak grayish Qtz veinlets &
traces of Hem + <Qtz veinlets,
PyOx disseminate <1%,
sporadic patches of PyOx
~40%. Poorly sorted sandstone
(50% 0.5 mm grain size, ~30%
of 1‐3 mm shale (?) subangular
B14082 536615 3365591 fragments alterated to sericite 0.274 1 12 50 150 50 0 0
PQP with moderate to weak
silicification patches, weak to
mod 1‐10 mm grayish to
whitish Qtz & Qtz + Hematite
stockwork (several trends),
Sericite traces. PyOx
disseminate <1%, few patches
of moderate Hematite.
Fracturing NW15/85. Weak
B14083 536562 3365568 content of mod He 0.040 0 0 50 70 0 0 0
NW‐SE 60‐70/80‐90 &
<SW10/85 moderate grayish
drussy Qtz stockwork, weak to
mod MnOx c/fract., sample
also inclides 0.5 m of each side
of wall rock, and SW wall rock
B14084 536638 3365583 with moderate Hematite. 1.970 4 54 300 460 60 0 0
Sample located on SW wall
rock. STR: NW45/75, moderate
weathered grayish‐purplish
rock with 1‐2 mm plagiocase
crystals & aphanitic
groundmass, Chlorite traces,
weak to moderate MnOx‐‐‐Qtz
B14085 536688 3365604 & Qtz‐‐‐MnOx stockwork. 0.282 10 48 350 980 60 0 0

Folded and laminated
siltstone‐shale & limestone
with weak gray silicification
along bedding planes. Soft
rock, moderate MnOx c/fract.,
Hematite patches along
B14086 536647 3365407 bedding planes. 0.039 9 166 990 3120 60 13 0
Moderate silicification and
phyllic (PQP contact zone), &
weak grayish Qtz + Hematite
stockwork & also whitish
drussy Qtz, main trend NW40,
PyOx (?) <1%, Limonite traces
B14087 536430 3365242 c/fractures. 0.266 0 6 20 50 0 0 0
Moderate Qtz veining (drussy
and banding) with trend
NW50‐60 & NW20, ~2 m of
breccia Qtz. Host rock:
moderate silicified PQP, weak
Hematite as patches. Sporadic
B14088 536398 3365290 argillic patches. 0.300 5 30 1120 740 10 0 0
Buena Suerte STR projection:
NW30/80. Strong to moderate
grayish‐whitish Qtz & Qtz +
Black mineral + Hematite
(zoning black mineral ? Qtz +
Hematite ? Qtz) stockwork &
breccia. Strong fracturing, also
drussy Qtz stockwork & Hem +
B14089 536433 3365271 <Qtz stockwork. Hosted 2.790 5 101 1100 240 60 0 0
Buena Suerte STR Projection:
NW‐SE20/85‐90. Sample
including 30 cm of Qtz vein
(Qtz + <Hem (after sulfide) +
<Black mineral), and 1 meter of
sample with strong silicification
and Qtz stockwork, 20 cm of
Fault breccia along vein.
B14090 536408 3365315 Hosted in strong silicif 0.436 9 37 480 250 0 0 0
Buena Suerte main STR
projection NW40/85, 1.2 m
sample including 15 cm of
drussy banded Qtz + Black
mineral + <Hem vein, rest of
sample is weak brecciate
sandstone withmoderate
B14091 536333 3365394 drussy banded Qtz. 2.800 12 146 2900 290 0 0 0
Moderate silicified gray‐<beige
0.5‐1.0 mm grain size
sandstone, weak Hem + <Qtz
stockwork & moderate whitish‐
transparent Qtz stockwork in
B14092 536326 3365389 several trends. 0.045 0 7 40 20 0 0 0
PQP with moderate
silicification, sericite patches,
B14093 536671 3365293 moderate gray‐grayish drussy 0.199 1 20 210 270 0 0 0

Qtz & <banded Qtz ? Hem ?
Qtz stockwork, 20 cm with
moderate Qtz + Black mineral
veining & weak breccia STR
(NW60/65).
40% of Qtz (gray & whitish‐
transparent Qtz) cement in
brecciate arkosic sandstone,
siltstone & shale sequence,
moderate Hematite in
STRucture (NW10?), weak
B14094 536623 3365267 silicification & sericite patches 0.184 4 80 580 550 60 0 0
Strong silicified 0.5 mm grain
size sandstone, weak and
sporadic patches of sericite,
moderate Hem + <Qtz & Qtz +
Hematite stockwork, and Qtz +
<Hem stockwork crosscuting
B14095 536580 3365291 Hem + <Qtz stockwork. 0.393 13 60 280 90 30 0 10
Moderate silcified PQP, few
moderate Hematite patches,
moderate drussy grayish‐
whitish transparent Qtz
stockwork & breccia (Qtz 30%)
with trend NW15 & NE‐SW20‐
B14096 536550 3365375 40. 0.508 6 49 560 210 20 0 0
Moderate‐strong silicified 0.5
mm gray sandstone, moderate
Hem + <Qtz stockwork
B14097 536533 3365403 (NW35/80), strong fracturing. 0.203 3 31 430 50 0 0 0
80 cm of breccia STR (SE10/85)
with 15‐20% of Qtz + Hematite
(after sulfide) cement,
moderate strong Hematite
patches, contact zone of beige‐
grayish 0.5 mm grain size
sandstone & PQP with
moderate to strong
B14098 535996 3365354 silicification. 1.380 2 189 2680 530 20 0 0
Sporadic 2‐3 cm banded drussy
Qtz + <Hem + <Black mineral,
hosted in reddish PQP with
moderate to strong phyllic (Qtz
+ <sericite), PyOx traces, weak
B14099 535892 3365338 Hem c/fractures. 0.081 0 48 90 280 10 0 0
of Qtz + Black mineral +
Hematite breccia vein (~80%
Qtz) with trend ~NW10/~70,
also <SE10‐SW10 Qtz veining,
SE wall rock with strong
silicification & Qtz + <Hem
B14100 535834 3365304 breccia. 6.660 58 169 1410 460 20 0 0
STR NW35/70, 1 meter of
drussy banded Qtz ? Black
B14101 536649 3365669 mineral, sporadic moderate 5.970 19 584 8830 3040 140 11 10

Hem patches, sample includes
25 cm of both wall rock with
moderate Hem + <Lim. NE wall
rock with weak drussy
amethyst Qtz.
of banded Qtz ? Qtz + Black
mineral ? Hem + <Qtz vein
(NW35/65), wall rock with
moderate drussy Qtz ? Black
mineral + Hematite ? Qtz
stockwork. Hosted in arkosic‐
lithic sandstone (0.5‐1.0 mm)
with patches of moderate
B14102 536606 3365730 phylli 0.998 4 294 2200 3260 60 0 10
Arkosic‐lithic sandstone (0.5‐
1.0 mm) with weak to
moderate silicification + phyllic
patches, weak to moderate 1‐5
mm grayish to whitish Qtz +
<<Hem‐Limonite (after sulfide)
stockwork (NW35‐50/70‐90),
and minnor late? Hematite in
B14103 536709 3365793 drussy open space. 0.278 1 104 480 590 0 0 0
1.2 m sample in NE wall rock of
40‐50 cm drussy and banded
Qtz vein (NW15/75). Sample
with weak to moderate 3‐10
mm Qtz + Hematite stockwork
crosscut by Qtz + <black
mineral stockwork. Hosted in
0.1‐0.5 mm arkosic sandstone
B14104 536597 3365848 with weak sericite + <<Qtz ov 0.554 2 152 1460 2600 20 0 0
STR NW30/70‐80, moderate
gray‐grayish to <whitish drussy
Qtz stockwork, sample includes
35 cm of breccia Qtz vein (40%
Qtz), hosted in fine grain
sandstone (<0.1 mm), with
weak phyllic (sericite + <Qtz)
overprinting propylitic, STR
B14105 536469 3365879 extends ~20 m SE30. 0.696 1 113 1470 1520 10 0 10
Strong to moderate 2‐20 mm
drussy gray‐grayish &
<transparent to whitish Qtz +
<<Black mineral + <<Hematite
stockwork with trend
NW35/70, hosted in pinkish‐
beige‐grayish <0.1‐0.2 mm
grain size sandstone, 1 meter
sample of weak brecciate rock
B14106 536558 3366019 & strong Qt 0.222 1 74 380 380 20 0 0
Weak & <<moderate Hematite
+ <<Qtz stockwork (NW30/65),
drussy Qtz, 1‐3 mm Py
boxwork, PyOx ~1%. Sporadic
B14107 536556 3366202 patches of Chlorite. 0.154 0 65 90 90 0 0 0

STR NW30/75, sample includes
30 cm of banded grayish‐
whitish & transparent drussy
Qtz vein with late stage of
massive black acicular mineral,
sometimes massive as drussy
growth with <<Hematite,
sample also includes 50 cm of
with weak‐moderate drussy
B14108 536517 3366140 Qtz 13.600 27 38 750 550 0 0 0
Moderate Qtz + <Hematite
stockwork & <transparent to
whitish drussy Qtz. Moderate
NE60 fracturing with weak
MnOx infill. Weak Hem
c/fractures. Sample in contact
zone of PQP and beige‐grayish
B14109 536497 3365478 quartz sandstone or quarzite. 1.360 3 54 360 470 40 0 0
STR: NW10/80, 1‐2 meters of
breccia Qtz vein & veining with
Qtz + Hematite (after sulfide) +
<Limonite + traces of un‐
B14110 535998 3365492 oxidized Galena & sphalerite. 1.045 38 43 9960 2130 70 0 10
Weak blackish & whitish
banded Qtz stockwork, weak
silicification, moderate Lim +
Hem + <Qtz veinlets, hosted in
B14115 538336 3365326 silty‐arkosic sandstone. 0.032 2 23 370 190 70 0 0
Moderate to strong grayish Qtz
+ <<Hem (after sulfide)
stockwork with trend as Fault
(NW45/85). Moderate to
strong silicification, sericite
patches traces, hosted in
contact of arkosic sandstone?
B14116 538190 3365398 & PQP. Sample ~2 m wide. 0.024 0 17 40 50 0 0 0
PQP with weak to moderate
phyllic alteration Qtz +
<sericite + PyOx (1‐2%), 0.5‐3
mm PyOx crystals, weak
whitish‐transparent drussy Qtz
B14117 538250 3365366 stockwork mostly NW15. 0.069 0 107 200 410 30 0 0
Weak grayish to transparent
drussy Qtz, including a 5 cm
Qtz vein, weak Qtz + <black
mineral veinlets, weak
Hematite in fractures. Hosted
in fine grain reddish arkosic‐
B14118 538284 3365297 lithic sandstone. 0.154 0 53 930 1200 10 0 0
Moderate to strong silicified
Qtz sandstone with weak & 15
cm with moderate <1 mm
Hematite + <Qtz stockwork.
B14121 538132 3365346 N00‐NW15. 0.855 0 28 20 20 0 0 10
Strong to moderate silicified
B14123 538000 3365341 beige‐grayish sandstone, 0.058 0 13 20 20 0 0 0

moderate transparent‐whitish
Qtz stockwork, weak grayish
drussy Qtz + <Hem & weak <1
mm Qtz + <<Lim (PyOx?)
veinlets.
~NE05/60 STR. 1.8 m sample,
including 20 cm of breccia Qtz
vein (30‐40% grayish‐
<transparent Qtz) and weak to
moderate silicified sandstone
with moderate Hematite in
B14124 537988 3365382 fractures. 0.020 0 30 20 70 10 0 0
NE30/65 STR: 20 cm of breccia
Qtz vein (~60% Qtz) with weak
Hematite content, SE wall rock
with weak to moderate
grayish‐whitish Qtz stockwork
and breccia, hosted in ~0.5 mm
grain size arkosic sandstone
with Sericite traces and weak
of moderate silicified dike with
10 cm of Qtz + Hem + Black
mineral breccia, & continued
by 80 cm with weak grayish
drussy Qtz veinlets. NW20
B14126 538164 3365506 STRucture. 0.034 0 34 370 1010 0 0 0
1 m sample. Including 20 cm
with moderate‐strong <1‐2
mm gray‐balckish Qtz +
Sulfide? stockwork (NE‐SE40)
crosscut by minor transparent
Qtz + <<Py (traces) veinlets,
and rest of sample with weak
to moderate Qtz & Qtz + <Hem
B14127 538261 3365461 veinlets, moderate‐strong sil 0.009 0 8 70 40 10 0 0
KFPQ (k‐feldspar + Pagioclase +
Qtz) 2‐5 mm grain size dike,
with moderate to weak phyllic,
patches of moderate argillic,
moderate bull Qtz, & grayish
Qtz stockwork with trend
NW30‐40/65, and Qtz + <Hem
B14128 538412 3365374 veinlets. 1 m wide sample. 0.014 0 14 130 60 20 5 0
1 meter wide sample, including
50 cm of white bull Qtz with
moderate late Hematite
stockwork with trend as bull
Qtz vein (NW35/45), rest of
sample is KFPQ with moderate
grayish Qtz stockwork and bull
Qtz, & <Hem c/fractures, as
B14129 538460 3365405 well as, moderate phyllic 0.023 0 25 270 110 30 0 10
STR NW20/60 (Main fault
B14130 538464 3365413 surface). Sample includes ~40 0.078 2 401 5430 3640 10 0 0

cm of irregular breccia Qtz vein
(gray Qtz + Black mineral +
Hematite), & 60 cm with
moderate grayish to whitish
Qtz stockwork, hosted in
moderate silicified dike with
Spherulite texture.
Moderate 1‐3 mm grayish Qtz
+ <Oxidized sulfide (Py &
Sphalerite?) to Hem + <<Lim,
patches of fresh Py ~1%,
sporadic Qtz veining as
bedding planes. STR
B14131 538261 3365547 ~NW40/65. 0.025 3 16 250 30 20 42 0
0.5 m wide sample, including
10 cm of grayish Qtz+ <Black
sulfide vein (N00/50 as fault
surface), and rest of sample
with weak Qtz stockwork
(transparent to whitish).
Selective sample, traces of
moderate Hematite patches,
B14132 538280 3365609 mostly Lim in fractures. 0.272 8 22 1080 70 0 19 0
Moderate silicified siltstone,
weak brecciate by whitish and
late grayish‐transparent Qtz,
Hematite traces, weak
Limonite c/fractures, drussy
B14133 537977 3365921 Qtz withtrend SE‐NW70/70‐50 0.078 2 23 60 60 10 0 0
Moderate‐strong silicified
sandstone?, few weak‐
fractures, weak Qtz + <Py
veinlets, un‐oxidized patches
B14134 538011 3365726 with Py disseminate ~1‐2%. 0.029 1 5 70 50 0 0 0
Moderate silicified arkosic
sandstone (1‐0.5 mm grain
size), weak‐moderate
transparent to grayish Qtz
veinlets, weak to moderate
Limonite c/fractures, weak
Hematite in fractures. Qtz +
Lim veinlets crosscuting to
grayish‐transparent Qtz
B14135 538361 3365540 veinlets. Stockw 0.015 0 0 150 30 0 0 0
1 meter sample. Including 10
cm of drussy Qtz vein
(whitish?gray?transparent
banding, sporadic patches of
strong Hematite, Galena
traces, & rest of sample with
moderate Qtz + <Hematite
stockwork. STR trend NW‐
SE15/80‐90, hosted in
B14136 538490 3365832 moderate silicified Di 0.162 3 36 400 200 10 0 0
B14137 538658 3365760 Selective sample of 20 & 5 cm 0.449 6 173 6510 4730 0 5 0

of breccia Qtz + Galena (~3‐5%)
vein withtrend NW‐SE30/80‐
90, moderate patches of
Hematite, crosscutting Bull Qtz
Sample includes 20 cm of
breccia Qtz + Hematite vein,
white Qtz close to wal & gray
Qtz + <oxidized sulfide in
center of vein. And 60 cm with
moderate Hematite + <banded
drussy Qtz (white?gray). STR
NW30/70. Hosted in weak
B14138 538616 3365623 silicified PQP with weak Hemat 0.014 2 17 800 260 0 0 0
Moderate to weak Hematite +
<Qtz stockwork crosscutting to
whitish‐transparent Qtz
stockwork SE15‐40/80‐85,
hosted in beige aphanitic felsic
rock with PyOx disseminate
~1%, patches of moderate
silicification, weak‐moderate
tiny <1 mm grayish Qtz
B14139 537830 3366060 stockwo 2.240 16 9 80 40 10 0 0
2 meter sample of Hanging
wall of "La Magdalena" STR,
consisting of moderate
whitish‐grayish drussy Qtz ±
Black mineral stockwork,
hosted in moderate silicified
fine grain sandstone &
siltstone, patches of strong
B14140 537716 3365719 argillic overprinting to phyllic. 0.487 14 164 710 2700 0 0 0
Sample includes 70 cm of Qtz
vein STR (NW15/50) with white
& grayish Qtz, & Qtz + MnOx,
drussy Qtz, sample also
includes 20 cm with moderate
silicification and weak Qtz
veining. Qtz vein same trend as
B14141 537714 3365718 bedding. 0.328 48 144 930 2500 10 0 0
STR NW30/55 (La Magdalena
STR projection?). Sample
includes 1 m of breccia Qtz
vein, transparent‐grayish &
<whitish drussy Qtz (90%),
weak to moderate Hem +
<Black mineral replacing
fragment of arkosic sandstone
relict, sample also includes 40
B14142 537887 3365458 cm of SW 1.190 51 84 1510 940 0 0 0
Sample includes 40 cm of
strong‐moderate silcification
with moderate grayish Qtz
stockwork (with trend
NW20/60‐65), located in
hanging wall of a 60 cm
B14143 537837 3365579 transparent and white bull (?) 0.199 7 162 1920 890 20 0 10

Qtz vein with trend NE45/50.
Sample also includes 1.4 m
with weak Hema
60 cm sample, including 30 cm
of Qtz + Hematite (strong)
vein, & 30 cm of moderate Qtz
+ Hematite + black mineral,
hosted in beige‐pinkish rock
with Qtz + <Plagioclase
phenocrystals (1%) and
aphanitic groundmasss,
moderate grayish Qtz +
B14144 536113 3366897 <<Hematite stock 11.200 778 135 3700 1450 40 10 0
folded silistone weak Hematite
c/ fracture, weak to moderate
silicificaction & patches
withsericite, 2m channel
sample perpendicular to
B14145 536103 3366900 general bedding 0.041 3 37 220 1150 90 5 0
185 azimuth and dipping 85° &
55°of transparent to whitish
Qtz stockwork & veining,
hosted in akss weak
silicificaction & phyllic patches,
PyOx 1%, patches of strong
B14146 535957 3366671 Hematite 0.848 20 46 450 480 20 7 0
STR SE50°/60° , 50 cm sample
including moderate Qtz
stockwork, & 1‐5 cm gray Qtz
veining, moderate Hematite in
fractures, patches of moderate
sericite+Qtz, moderate to weak
argillic over printing, old
working to SE 50. Hosting rock
B14148 536108 3366626 shale & <siltstone se 0.528 38 56 710 430 50 0 0
Moderate 1‐3 mm transparent
drussy Qtz stockwork NE80/70‐
80, weak Hematite in fractures
, sporadic grayish Qtz veinlets,
weak MnOx in fractures,
sericite traces, hosted in
reddish 0.5 mm. Arkosic &
B14149 536864 3364901 lithic? Sandstone. 0.136 0 10 40 60 60 0 0
Moderate 1‐2 mm Qtz + black
mineral stockwork (NW10/80‐
90) moderate MnOx in
fractures; 1)black mineral +
<<Qtz, 2) Qtz + <<black
mineral, 3) whitish transparent
Qtz stockwork traces. Patches
of sericite weak Hematite in
fractures. Moderate to weak
B14150 536903 3364924 silic 0.240 2 7 60 180 0 0 0
La mina Maria STR projection
STR projection NE10/65, 40 cm
B14151 536884 3364933 Qtz vein (Qtz 90%), gray & 1.880 35 101 1520 340 0 0 0

withish Qtz , traces of
Hematite (after sulfide) & black
mineral ~1%, hosted in reddish
ss, old working to SE05 (STR
NW05/70), SE wall rock with
moderate grayish Qtz
Moderate 2‐4 mm; 1) Gray Qtz
stockwork, 2) Drussy
transparent‐whitish Qtz
stockwork, include 5 cm of
gray‐<whitish Qtz vein
(NW10/65). Hosted in 0.5‐0.7
mm grain size redish ss, PyOx
B14152 536893 3364942 diss <1% 0.094 1 14 160 170 0 0 0
1.7 m sample, moderate
transparent‐whitish 0.1‐5 cm
drussy Qtz veining (NW35/80),
Qtz + << Hematite (after
ssulfide crystals), weak
Hematite in fractures, hosted
in reddish‐<beige sandstone,
B14153 536940 3364972 PyOx 1% 0.811 1 42 530 380 0 0 0
Weak to moderate 1‐3 mm
whitish‐grayish drussy NW50 &
NE10‐30 stockwork weak
Hematite in fractures, few
moderate MnOx in fractures,
PyOx <1%. Host rock: reddish
0.2‐ 0.5 mm grain size arkosic
B14154 536850 3365023 sandsotne 0.032 5 6 240 210 0 0 0
Moderate‐strong sicilicification
& Qtz + Hematite (after slfide)
stockwork, patches of phyllic,
drussy Qtz stockwork, host
rock: 1‐3 mm plagioclase + Qtz
(10%) intrusive rock (Dike?).
Main veinlets trend NW20/65‐
B14155 535400 3364253 70. 0.026 1 100 3340 800 20 6 0
40 cm Qtz + Galena +
<<Hematite (after sde) vein SE‐
NW30, gray drussy Qtz, Qtz +
Gn & Qtz + Hematite stages.
Host rock: plag(70%),
andesite?, moderate‐strong
B14156 535438 3364273 chlorite + calcite (propylitic) 0.141 5 169 7860 450 20 0 0
1 m sample, breccia Qtz vein
~50 cm, moderate dark gray &
also dussy Qtz stockwork
(grayish), some cavities of
sulfide (?) relicts (Hematite &
limonite remplaced), grayish
drussy Qtz crosscuting to black
mineral + Qtz veinlets,
B14157 535509 3364359 moderate argillic fragme 0.503 7 236 2950 2350 90 60 0
STR with drussy Qtz veinents &
B14158 535518 3364365 sporadic grayish veinlets, 2.320 4 100 2000 1360 30 21 0

specularite Hematite,
magnetite, hosted in
andesitic?? Rock with weak
phyllic & weak prophilitic
alteration (fine grain
plagioclase & biotite traces),
someties observed amethyst
Qtz in veinlets
1m hanging wall with weak 1‐2
cm transparent drussy Qtz +
<<Hematite (after sufide),
weak phyllic overprinting to
propylitic; hosted in 1‐3 mm
crystals of plagioclase, K‐
feldspar & Qtz (15%). 40 cm
bull Qtz vein NW 35/65, old
B14159 535603 3364358 working to NW45. Close to 0.021 0 19 110 800 10 0 0
4 meters with 4 Qtz vein +
black mineral of 20‐30 cm
wide, breccia Qtz vein, cavities
after fragments?. Few
Hematite patches, gray‐dark
gray Qtz . Trend NW45/70‐60.
Patches of silica , & moderate
argillic overprinting to phyllic.
B14160 535663 3364468 photo lookng NW 50, hos 5.760 3 74 5040 4200 20 19 0
1 m aprox STRuture (NW50/60)
Breccia with Qtz fragments ~1‐
4 cm of wide cemented by
specular Hematite , sporadic
tiny grayish Qtz veinlets,
fractures, weak phyllic
alteration & weak propylitic
alteration, the STRucture is
B14161 535673 3364470 hosted in 0.532 1 187 4420 4900 60 0 0
San Quintin old working, 1.6 m
of sample, banded gray‐whitish
Qtz + vein & 20% of late stage
of calcite infilling open space of
drussy Qtz N00/70 STR, hosted
in k‐
feldespar+<plagioclase+Qtz +<
bt intrusive or dike (1‐3 mm
B14162 536506 3364454 crystals size ) 1.125 81 86 3020 8250 30 14 0
STR NW50/75, sample incuding
40 cm of whitish‐transprent <
grayish Qtz vein ( Qtz 10 % ,
black mineral traces, Qtz
+<<black mineral,also drussy
Qtz , & few moderate MnOx
infill, hosted in fine grain beige
ss, PyOx sample also includes
B14163 536409 3364277 20 cm with weak t 0.565 101 65 900 1240 10 0 0
sample including, 10 cm of
moderate & weak
B14164 536613 3364603 Qtz+Hematite veinig, & 60 cm 0.065 1 8 70 200 20 6 0

with wek transparent Qtz &
Qtz +<Hematite stockwork
hosted in arkossic??, trend SE
60/50‐45
2 m of sample, including 70 cm
‐ 1 m Qtz (grayish &
transparent, patches of drussy
Qtz + <<Limonite) vein, 1 m
with moderate drussy Qtz
veining & patches of Hematite,
hosted in moderate phyllic
alterated KfPQ, with patches of
B14165 536750 3364696 argillic overprinting, tr 6.070 183 108 1610 730 70 0 0
Qtz vein (NW 35/85) with
banded grayish & late
transprent & amethyst Qt z, &
Qtz + Hematite (after sulfide),
rest of sample includes
moderate grayish Qtz + <late
Hematite, also includes weak
NE‐SW Qtz stockwork. Hosted
B14166 536782 3364673 in m 2.100 49 82 440 380 10 0 0
1 m of sample , including 40
cm of banded Qtz + Hematite+
black mineral vein (trend NW
15/70), 60 cm of moderate
drussy Qtz+black mineral
stockwork of hanging wall.
Hosted in moderate phyllic &
transparent Qtz stockwork, in
B14167 536892 3364711 k‐feldespar+ plagioclase+Qtz 13.250 427 550 8760 2480 0 5 0
1.7 m sample including, 1.3 m
brecia Qtz vein whitish
silicified fragments brecciate
by gray pale green mineral, STR
locally SE 30/70, drussy Qtz +
black mineral+ < Hematite
patches veining, 30 cm with
moderate grayish Qtz
B14168 536937 3364619 stockwork 2.600 51 439 3480 1980 10 5 0
1.7 m, weak to moderate
whitish‐grayish irregular Qtz
stockwork & drussy Qtz + black
mineral 30 cm with Hematite
in fractures, weak phyllic
(sericite + <Qtz + <PyOx diss
<1%), & weak limonite in
fractures, host rock 0.2‐0.5 mm
B14169 536929 3364902 akss volcanosediments 0.885 5 63 130 410 10 0 0
1.6 m sample, including
moderate drussy Qtz + blck
mineral +Hematite veinlets &
grayish Qtz stockwork, trend
NW 40/75,hosted in moderate
phyllic arkss, PyOx < 1 % , also
B14170 536984 3364873 whitish Qtz veinlets, sporadic 0.407 9 119 1030 1170 0 8 0

chl traces+PyOx veinlets
2 m of sample, including drussy
banded Qtz vein, patches
Hematite & black mineral ,
MnOx in fractures, STR hosted
in sandstone rock with phyllic
B14171 536963 3364926 alteration 2.000 104 204 2650 1720 30 0 0
1.8 m sample, moderate to
weak grayish ‐whitish Qtz
stockwork ( NW15/75),
including 15 cm of breccia
Qtz+<Hematite vein (~30%
drussy Qtz cement), weak
Hematite in fractures, STR
B14172 536945 3364935 hosted in reddish sandstone 1.265 2 21 380 140 10 0 0
Los Cuervos STR projection
(NW 35/55) 1.8 m sample,
including 1.4 m breccia Qtz
vein (80/90% Qtz) , patches
Hematite (after sulfide) , 40 cm
weak Qtz 30% Bx, banded &
B14173 536934 3364995 whitish Qtz. 0.286 39 40 2680 370 50 40 0
Los Cuervos STRucture , 1.50
of sample, drussy grayish‐
whitish banded Qtz vein with
weak Hematite & black mineral
in fractures & cavities, hosted
in greenish sandstone & PPQ
(Qtz eyes + plagioclase) rock
B14174 536920 3365047 with tiny Qtz stockwork 0.501 2 40 400 320 10 0 0
1 m of sample, moderate
whitish‐grayish drussy Qtz
stockwork (NW 10‐20/70 & NE
20‐30/60‐70), sample including
one 20 cm drussy Qtz vein
(weak late? Hematite & drussy
black mineral infill) with trend
NW 10/&70,hosted in PQP
B14175 536897 3365054 with weak silicification, ser 0.117 2 29 610 780 0 0 0
1.3 m of sample, including 20
cm of weak Bx Qtz + vein (Qtz +
Galena +<<Sphalerite +
Hematite (after sulfide) (NW
30/85) weak chlorite in
fractures & weak phyllic
overprinting, rest of sample
includes weak silicified beige
sandstone , & weak NE50‐60
B14176 536941 3365045 sto 0.331 3 16 5540 3900 40 8 0
Weak to moderate grayish‐
whitish drussy Qtz stockwork
(NW30/80 & <NE‐SE10‐30),
weak Hematite c/fractures,
also Limonite c/fractures, weak
MnOx c/fractures, weak
B14177 537025 3365018 silicification and phyllic fine 0.093 0 32 50 70 10 0 0

grain beige sandstone.
2.5 m breccia STR (NW20/40)
~60% Qtz, with dark gray, gray,
whitish Qtz & banded drussy
Qtz infill, few moderate
Hematite in fractures,
fragment remplaced by MnOx
weak chlorite veinlets, patches
with phyllic. Note : weak
NE30/80 drussy Qtz stockwork
B14178 537070 3364892 & 0.607 5 111 3860 2640 20 0 0
70 cm of sample, including 30
cm of Bx Structure (NW25/75),
weak 20% of whitish‐
transparent drussy Qtz
cement, weak Hematite,
hosted in reddish arkosic
sandstone weak phyllic (ser)
B14179 537089 3364929 overprinting to chlorite + PyOx 0.454 1 52 1360 760 10 0 0
Moderate drussy Qtz
stockwork & weak brecciate
rock, drussy whitish & gray Qtz
stockwork NW15 to NE05/70‐
85, sparce moderate Hematite
patches, rock with weak
Hematite in fractures , and
weak silicification overprinting
to weak propylitic, sporadic
B14180 537077 3364879 ameth 0.733 1 243 1840 1880 10 0 0
40 cm sample , weak grayish &
whitish Qtz stockwork, & 3 cm
Qtz + Hematite (30%) veinlet,
patches of moderate
silicification, weak drussy Qtz
veinlets, weak Qtz + sericite,
PyOx traces, weak late
B14181 537096 3364817 Hematite in drussy Qtz veinlets 0.038 0 12 140 120 10 5 0
60 cm sample, breccia STR
NW30/60, 40% drussy Qtz
(whitish to grayish) cement,
moderate Hematite as cavities
infill, weak MnOx in fractures,
hosted in fine grain (0.1‐0.2
mm) beige sandstone, weak
B14182 537142 3364780 phyllic alteration 2.480 3 45 570 470 30 8 0
Crackel Bx or moderate
stockwork (NW‐SE30/80‐90)
whitish & grayish drussy Qtz,
Hematite as late? drussy Qtz
infill, weak Hematite in
fractures, hosted in moderate
silicification fine grain beige
sandstone, weak phyllic,
B14183 537184 3364804 limonite in fractures, PyOx 1% 0.037 0 7 90 50 0 0 0
1.2 m sample, breccia & drussy
B14184 537135 3364709 banded Qtz vein (NW10/50‐ 0.053 3 86 2940 900 20 6 0

55), whitish ? grayish Qtz ?
Hematite + <Qtz (few) ? gray
Qtz. Gray Qtz crosscuting to
whitish Qtz, Note: STR is
located beween the Fault?
contact of beige sandstone &
KFPQ
1 m of sample, SW30/85
breccia Qtz vein (60 cm) with
grayish & whitish drussy Qtz,
sample also includes 1 cm
banded drusy Qtz stockwork
(NW50‐80). Hosted in KFPQ
with moderate phyllic and
silicification, weak Hematite
B14185 537104 3364706 c/fractures. 0.097 1 22 270 490 10 16 0
40 cm grayish‐whitish banded
drussy Qtz vein (NW20/70)
with Qtz & Qtz + Hematite
banding, Hematite+<<black
B14186 537118 3364698 mineral in fractures. 0.108 1 24 380 180 10 14 0
Moderate 2‐10 mm whitish‐
transparent < grayish drussy
Qtz stockwork (NW 30‐40/80‐
85), weak Hematite in
fractures, hosted in 0.5 mm
grain size beige sandstone with
weak ‐moderate phyllic
alteration, PyOx diss 1%, Grab
B14187 536961 3364799 sample 0.027 1 8 20 50 110 0 0
1.3 sample, Moderate silicified
KFPQ, weak Hematite
c/fractures and patches, weak
to moderate 2‐30 mm whitish
drussy Qtz + <<Hem stockwork,
whitish‐grayish stockwork with
B14188 536999 3364777 trend NW30‐40/70‐80. 0.029 0 0 0 10 0 0 0
NW50/45 STR, 60 cm of
Hematite & drussy Qtz breccia,
strong to moderate Hematite
content. Fragments of breccia
replaced by moderate‐strong
B14189 537052 3364763 Hematite and also by Sericite. 2.980 6 83 1920 1190 20 11 0
~3 m strong‐moderate whitish
drussy Qtz & Qtz+black
mineral veining, & breccia STR
(NW 40‐50/30), also gray
drussy Qtz, hosted in contact
zone ( intrusive rock & reddish
B14190 537053 3364764 sandstone) 1.835 14 203 4940 1550 10 8 0
1.5 m sample, weak breccia
STR (NW25‐30/45‐50) with
~20% of drussy grayish‐whitish
Qtz, Qtz + Hem & Qtz + <Black
mineral, moderate Hematite
B14191 537090 3364761 content c/fractures, hosted in 0.280 1 155 2100 1670 20 0 0

KFPQ intrusie, sporadic weak‐
moderate Chlorite patches,
PyOx <1%.
KFPQ with moderate
silicification, weak to moderate
grayish & whitish <1‐2 mm Qtz
stockwork with Hematite halos
or c/fractures, weak phyllic,
stockowork with trend Nw10‐
B14192 537078 3364726 40 & NE30, PyOx ~1%. 0.471 0 29 220 100 0 0 0
mod 1‐3 mm drussy & weak
banded Qtz +<< Hematite
grayish & whitish Qtz
stockwork (N00/80‐90)
croscuting to 2
mmQtz+<<Hematite (oxi
sulfide) stockwork SW 80/40,
moderate phyllic KFPQ , PyOx
<1%, patches of moderate
silicification weak Hematite in
B14193 537063 3364697 fractur 0.385 1 30 310 230 0 5 0
1 m sample, including 10 cm of
grayish‐whitish Qtz vein
(NW40/45), & moderate to
strong microfracturing with
B14194 537033 3364656 grayish Qtz infill or veinlets. 0.718 1 63 560 160 20 0 0
~1 m sample, including 30 cm
of weak breccia STR (NE10/70)
with whitish Qtz + <late?
Hematite cement, hosted in
KFPQ, moderate silicification
and phyllic patches, rest of
sample with weak‐moderate
B14195 537052 3364625 <1 mm whitish Qtz veinlets. 0.011 0 65 50 120 0 7 0
1.1 m grab sample, weak to
moderate <1‐20 mm drussy
Qtz + <<Hematite stockwork
(SE40 & N00) hosted in
moderate phyllic
(Sericite+Qtz), whitish‐grayish
B14196 537033 3364594 drussy Qtz. 0.074 1 25 90 90 0 0 0
1 m of sample, moderate 1‐3
cm drussy & grayish Qtz
stockwork (NW40‐50/60‐70),
weak Hematite c/fractures,
hosted in intrusive rock with
mod to weak phyllic alteration
B14197 537008 3364593 & silicification, PyOx diss <1%. 0.177 0 18 130 470 10 0 0
of banded Qtz vein & 30 cm of
NE wall rock with moderate
grayish & banded drussy Qtz
stockwork (NW35‐40/85‐80).
Host rock KFPQ with patches of
moderate phyllic and

La Maria STR projection, 40 cm
sample, drussy & weak banded
Qtz veining (NW10/75). Host
rock: reddish sandstone with
B14199 536907 3364813 weak drussy Qtz stockwork. 3.300 29 131 1580 900 80 0 0
1.80 m of sample, moderate
drussy Qtz + <Hem & Qtz +
Black mineral stockwork
(NW20‐80‐90) & dark gray Qtz
(NE80‐70/55). KFPQ with
biotite? Replaced by sericite,
and patches of moderate
B14200 536877 3364760 phyllic. 0.145 1 8 80 140 0 0 0
80 cm , including 20 cm of
drussy banded Qtz + black
mineral +Hematite vein
(NW15/60), & wall rock with
weak to mod Qtz + <Hematite
stockwork, hosted in KFPQ w
B14201 536862 3364732 patches of mod phyllic. 4.480 3 86 1160 610 10 0 0
70 cm of breccia STR
(NW20/80), grayish‐whitish
drussy Qtz & Qtz +<Hematite
B14202 536881 3364716 as cement, hosted in KFPQ. 0.980 28 34 570 770 20 0 0
Grab sample, including 2
breccia structures of whitish‐
<transparent & sporadic
amethyst Qtz & grayish Qtz,
weak Hematite in cavities.
Hoste rock: sandstone rock
with propylithic alteration.
Sample also includes moderate
B14203 536906 3364735 to strong silicified folded sands 0.081 1 25 40 90 30 0 0
La Maria STR projection (NW
25/65), weak breccia STR with
drussy Qtz + << Hematite (late
or open space of drussy Qtz) as
cement, 15‐20% Qtz as
cement, gray & whitish drussy
Qtz. Host rock: moderate
silicified sandstone (beige &
B14204 536922 3364742 folded sandstone) 0.090 1 17 210 350 40 0 0
50 cm sample, moderate
silicified KFPQ with moderate
to weak 0.3‐2 cm drussy Qtz
stockwork N00/80, weak
Hematite patches in
B14205 536971 3364759 groundmasss. 0.000 0 11 160 90 0 0 0
Grab sample, ~60 cm of weak
brecciate rock with
transparent‐whitish drussy Qtz
infill & weak late Hematite
infill, trend NE30/60‐80, &
<NW 20 moderate silicification
folded beige sandstone, weak
B14206 537015 3364714 phyllic alteration, PyOx? diss 1‐ 0.030 0 7 30 70 20 0 0

3 %
1 m of sample, including 30 cm
of grayish drussy Qtz vein
(SE45/85), 70 cm of gray drussy
Qtz (Qtz 40%) breccia STR,
mod phyllic alteration & mod
B14207 536924 3364631 silicification 0.433 27 68 1450 1250 0 0 0
50 cm of sample, brecia STR
(NW 30/75‐80), 50‐30% of
gray‐whitish‐transparent
drussy Qtz as cement,
Hematite & black mineral
traces in fracts & cavities, STR
hosted in beige sanstone with
B14208 536889 3364643 mod phyllic patches. 0.155 1 58 190 230 30 0 0
1 m of sample , including mod‐
strong tiny grayish Qtz veinlets
& <whitish drussy Qtz
stockwork (NW‐SE30‐50/70‐
80), weak brecciate rock. Host
rock: reddish saandstone rock
with mod strong phyllic and
1.60 m of sample, (NW45 /80)
including 1.30 m grayish &
ametyst Qtz, also observed
drussy Qtz with black mineral
traces << Hematite in fracts, 30
cm with tiny grayish Qtz
stockwork, hosted in reddish
sandstone rock with mod
B14210 536875 3364570 phyllic alteration, and also 0.447 12 86 1150 860 0 0 0
1.2 m, including 40 cm of
grayish‐whitish banded Qtz
vein NE‐SW10/85‐90, Qtz +
<Hematite + <Lim‐Jarosite +
black mineral, & 20 cm of
breccia Qtz vein (SE walk rock
of sample), rest of sample
weak‐moderate whitish drussy
Qtz + <<Hematite, in k‐
B14211 536763 3364656 feldespar 1.060 32 64 1060 350 10 0 0
1.20 m of sample, moderate
grayish and whitish drussy Qtz
+ <Hematite stockwork with
trend SW‐NE20‐30 & NW10‐
20, moderate Hematite +
<<black mineral in fractures &
cavities, hosted KFPQ with
moderate phyllic alteration &
B14212 536803 3364618 mod silicification, PyOx <1% di 0.144 0 11 20 30 10 0 0
1.50 m of sample, including 60
cm of drussy and banded Qtz
vein with whitish‐transparent
B14213 536759 3364585 & grayish Qtz, sample also 0.361 10 185 3920 1400 30 11 0

includes breccia STR with
fragments replaced by MnOx
and black mineral. STR with
trend NE10/75‐80 hosted in
KFPQ with moderate phyllic, P
1 m, moderate to weak 0.2‐
5cm whitish‐transparent
drussy Qtz + <<Oxidized sulfide
stockwork (NW10/75 & NE10‐
20) hosted in intrusive rock (k‐
feldespar, palg, Qtz) with
moderate‐strong phyllic
alteration & weak‐moderate
silicification, weak Hematite
B14214 536820 3364590 c/fra 0.337 1 10 40 90 10 5 0
STR NW20/80, 50 cm of grayish
& whitish drussy banded
Qtz+Hematite vein, rest of
sample with Qtz veining, Mnox
in fractures, hosted in
B14215 536838 3364587 moderate phyllic KFPQ 0.717 11 35 630 260 10 0 0
1.5 m of drussy & banded
grayish‐<whitish Qtz vein (Qtz
& Qtz + Hematite banding)
NW10/80 & locally NW 20/65,
hosted in KFPQ with weak
phyllic & moderate argillic
B14216 536781 3364486 patches in foot wall rock. 0.407 21 106 3430 430 0 13 0
Grab sample, including
moderate 1‐2 cm whitish‐
grayish drussy Qtz +
<<Hematite stockwork (NE10,
NW10, N‐S/ high angle),
hosted in KFPQ (k‐feldespar,
plagioclase, Qtz) with weak
propylitic (chlorite + pyrite
veinlets) alteration & weak
40 cm of sample, breccia STR
(NW45/70) with grayish &
withish drussy Qtz cement,
PyOx & boxwork sulfide?,
hostedin KFPQ (k‐feldespar,
plag, Qtz), ith weak propylitic
(chlorite + pyrite veinlets)
alteration & weak phyllic
B14218 536839 3364474 alteration. 0.468 1 99 780 450 10 0 0
70 cm sample, grayish drussy
banded Qtz + <Hematite
breccia vein (S00/80) with
black mineral ?? + Hematite in
cavities, fragments of breccia
replaced by Hematite, Py?
boxwork 1% aprox, hosted in
contact zone green intrusive
B14219 536946 3364509 rock with tabular crystals 0.260 10 73 18000 12850 0 9 0

Grayish & <grayish drussy Qtz
& Qtz + <PyOx + <Oxidized
sulfide (Hematite) & Hematite
+ <Qtz veining with trend
NW20/80 & <NW40/65,
moderate Hematite c/fractures
& patches. Hosted in KFPQ
with moderate phyllic and
silicified patches, PyOx ~1%.
B14220 537115 3364650 Main STR 0.111 2 57 550 360 0 0 0
mod to weak 0.5‐5 cm
Hematite + Qtz (NE 30/80) &
grayish drussy Qtz + Hematite
(NW10/80) stockwork hosted
in moderate silicified KFPQ, &
patches of moderate phyllic,
weak to moderate Hematite in
B14221 537083 3364611 fractures. 0.098 1 48 390 380 0 0 0
60 cm sample including
sporadic drussy Qtz+Hematite (
transparent & grayish Qtz),
NW20/75 & 20 cm of breccia
STR (NW40) hosted in KFPQ
dike of ~6 m wide and general
tredn NW30‐40, with
moderate phyllic & zones with
B14222 537042 3364479 fractures PyOx di 0.091 1 43 1930 470 0 0 0
1 m , gray & transparent Qtz +
< oxide sulfide (Hematite &
limonite) & Hematite drussy
banded vein with trend
NW25/80. Hosted in weak‐
B14223 536990 3364437 mod phyllic FKPQ. 0.223 10 162 4350 7930 20 0 0
50 cm moderate 1‐3 mm
grayish& drussy Qtz &
Qtz+Hematite (after sulfide)
stockwork NW 25/75, weak
phyllic & silicification 0.2‐0.5
mm beige sandstone , PyOx
B14224 537183 3364836 <1% 0.251 1 38 370 390 20 0 0
40 cm sample , moderate
grayish drussy Qtz & 1‐3 mm
Qtz + Hematite stockwork (
NW30‐40/40‐70 & <SE55/75),
weak Hematite & limonite in
fractures 8Qtz +PyOx), weak
silicification & phyllic hosted in
beige 0.2 ‐ 0.5 mm grain size
B14225 537192 3364922 Sandstone rock with trend 0.027 0 13 50 90 0 0 0
Weak to mod <1 mm up to 2
mm transparent to whitish
irregular Qtz stockwork, few
patches of mod Hematite,
PyOx <1%, weak phyllic &

Weak to mod 1‐3 mm
transparent‐grayish drussy Qtz
& <whitish Qtz , & drussy Qtz +
<Hematite, weak to mod
phyllic patches, weak
silicification, PyOx < 1%, rock
B14227 537223 3364992 trend SE60/45 0.087 0 10 10 50 0 0 0
Grab sample, mod gray‐dark
gray 1‐3 mm Qtz + <oxidized
sulfide stockwork, (NW20‐
30/55‐60 & <E‐W, sporadic
patches of mod silicification,
weak phyllic patches PyOx,
Hematite + <Qtz crosscuting to
gray‐grayish Qtz stockwork.
B14228 537221 3365035 Hosted rock sandstone (0.2‐0.5 0.308 4 26 180 30 0 0 0
Grab sample, including 15 cm
of weak breccia STR, weak
Hematite + <<Qtz cement, &
weak to mod Hematite + Qtz &
Qtz (transparent‐whitish)
stockwork, hosted in moderate
silicification PQP, weak
selective sericite in plagioclase,
B14229 537219 3365073 general trend of structur 0.243 0 6 30 30 0 0 0
breccia Qtz vein (90% Qtz),
NW80/45, & weak to mod
grayish‐transparent drussy Qtz
stockwork, weak Hematite,
weak phyllic, moderate
silicification PyOx <1% , weak
limonite in fractures hosted
rock beige 0.5 mm grain
B14230 537234 3365086 sandstone 0.032 0 10 90 60 10 0 0
Grab sample, moderate
whitish‐transparent Qtz +
<Hematite (after sulfide)
stockwork N00/ 70‐80, & <SW
80, moderate Hematite in
fractures , hosted : 0.1 ‐1 mm
Qtz rich sandstone with weak‐
moderate silicification, weak
Hematite c/fractures, PyOx
B14231 537228 3365110 diss ~3% 0.030 0 8 20 10 0 0 0
Sample 30 cm, including 15 cm
of gray Qtz + Hematite (after
sulfide) vein (NW15/75‐80),
rest of sample weak‐moderate
transparent‐grayish Qtz +
<<Hematite stockwork, PyOx
~2%, hosted rock PQP with
weak silicification & phyllic,
B14232 537303 3365078 weak Limonite in fractures 0.233 1 73 920 360 0 0 0
Weak gray‐grayish Qtz
stockwork NW30/55 & <
B14233 537254 3365037 (NW50/45), weak drussy 0.519 1 156 1600 270 0 0 0

Hematite + Black mineral +
<Qtz irregular stockwork,
patches of argillic overprinting
to phyllic, host rock: reddish
sandstone akss
Moderate 1‐20 mm stockwork
of transparent‐whitish Qtz &
Qtz + <Hematite (after sulfide)
& drussy Qtz NW30‐35/70 &
<N00/65, host rock: PQP with
weak phyllic , PyOx <1% weak
B14234 537250 3365049 silicified patches 0.141 0 57 590 280 20 0 0
70 cm, weak breccia STR (NW
40) with weak drussy Qtz &
Hematite cement, moderate
Hematite in fractures, hosted
in PQP with weak phyllic &
1.1 m, weak breccia STR (NW‐
SE 30/65‐75) weak
transparent‐grayish‐whitish
Qtz + Hematite (after sulfide) &
sporadic <10 cm Hematite
breccia STR, weak phyllic &
silicification, PyOx < 1%, host
rock: fine grain beige & folded
B14236 537308 3364929 sandstone 0.292 3 34 190 350 20 0 0
80 cm sample, weak to
moderate 2‐20 mm
transparent‐whitish drussy
Qtz+ <<Hematite (after sulfide)
& weak second stage of gray‐
grayish Qtz stockwork, with
trend N00‐NW10/ 70‐80. Host
rock: reddish Arkosic‐lithic
sandstone (0.1‐0.5 mm grain
B14246 538047 3364997 size) with sel 0.025 1 112 140 120 50 0 0
60 cm Qtz vein STR (NW60/65‐
70), drussy banded Qtz vein
(gray Qtz?Hematite (after
sulfide)?transparent Qtz
<<Hematite, Qtz + black
mineral?grayish & whitish Qtz?
B14247 538080 3365016 & <amethyst Qtz) 0.320 5 41 4010 1510 10 22 0
Grab sample, breccia 1.2 m
thick; hidrotermal breccia with
~40 % of cement including
grayish & transparent Qtz, Qtz
+ Hematite, Qtz + black
mineral, 0.3‐5 cm fragment
size, and reddish sandstone,
strong propylitic & pinkish
B14248 538079 3365015 sandstone as fragments rock b 0.061 1 37 1070 3330 30 0 0
70 cm, gray & whitish drussy
Qtz vein with trend NE30/80,
B14252 538008 3365048 Qtz + black mineral?Hematite + 0.708 30 120 5500 920 70 0 0

<Qtz, gray Qtz & Qtz +
<Hematite banding, weak
MnOx in fractures, Qtz +
Hematite & Limonite (after
sulfide).
1.5 m, gray & whitish
transparent drussy Qtz vein,
also Qtz + <Hematite banding
& hanging wall with 20 cm of
whitish‐grayish Qtz breccia.
Host rock reddish sandstone
with weak silicified
groundmass, weak MnOx in
B14253 538002 3365071 fractures, STR NE15/70. 2.590 91 107 5400 710 10 0 0
30‐40 cm banded grayish &
whitish Qtz & Qtz +<Hematite
vein (NW60/55) host rock
reddish sandstone, 40 cm of
foot wall withQtz & Hematite
B14254 538026 3365094 cemented Bx 0.567 4 76 1370 1000 10 0 0
60 sample, moderate
transparent‐grayish‐whitish
drussy Qtz stockwork witn
general trend NW 60/65. Host
rock: reddish sandstone, close
to contact with PQP, reddish
sandstone with weak silicified
patches. Weak hematite as
B14255 538030 3365121 infill in cavities of drussy Qt 0.045 1 26 230 140 20 0 0
of drussy & banded
transparent‐whitish & grayish
Qtz vein (NW30/65), & 30 cm
with weak drussy Qtz & Qtz +
<<Hematite stockwork, weak
to moderate silicified reddish
sandstone, weak hematite in
B14256 538127 3365077 fractures 0.583 1 33 370 240 20 0 0
1.1 m, whitish‐grayish drussy
Qtz stockwork (1‐20 mm) with
trend NW25/85‐90, hosted in
reddish sandstone with PyOx
B14257 538141 3365138 1% 0.250 1 20 60 110 20 0 0
La Española STR proyection,
2.5 m STR breccia NW50/45,
gray‐grayish & transparent
breccia‐banded‐Qtz vein
(drussy Qtz), & Qtz+
B14261 537959 3365253 <<Hematite (after sulfide) 0.063 3 49 330 260 20 0 0
1 m sample, breccia STR (NE20‐
35/75‐80) with 20‐30% of
drussy Qtz + <<oxid sulfide
(traces) cement, transparent‐
whitish & grayish Qtz, host
rock: reddish sandstone with
B14262 537995 3365005 weak phyllic & silicification 0.116 1 23 60 140 30 0 0

transparent to grayish drussy
Qtz + <<oxidized sulfide
(Limonite‐Hematite) as 10‐20
cm breccia & stockwork (NE20‐
30/‐65). host rock: plagioclase
rich (40%) & aphanitic
groundmass rock, with PyOx
B14263 537957 3365064 1%, weak phyllic & silicification 0.088 0 20 30 40 50 0 0
40 cm of sample, moderate 1‐5
mm grayish‐transparent &
<<whitish drussy Qtz +
<oxidized sulfide stockwork
(NW 30‐40/70‐80), hosted in
contact of redish sandstone &
B14264 537975 3365127 PQP (weak silicification). 0.109 1 18 300 220 10 0 0
La Española estrructure
projection NW15/60 1 m
sample, including 50 & 20 cm
of gray drussy & banded
Qtz?Qtz+hematite?whitish Qtz
& weak late drussy amethyst
Qtz, & 30 cm of breccia Qtz
(30% Qtz cement) between
B14265 537987 3365142 two veins. 1.185 6 218 3530 1000 20 0 0
Moderate 2‐20 mm whitish‐
<transparent drussy Qtz
stockwork NW‐SE30‐40/70 ‐80.
Hosted in PQP with PyOx
disseminate 1%, weak silicified
B14268 538008 3365214 patches, sericite traces 0.021 0 21 100 80 0 0 0
1 m sample, moderate drussy
Qtz + << hematite (after
sulfide) stockwork & weak
brecciate STR with trend
NW30/70 , grayish‐transparent
& whitish drussy Qtz, hosted
in PQP with weak phyllic &
B14269 537933 3365223 PyOx 1‐3%. 0.088 2 38 240 270 0 0 0
1.2 m sample, breccia Qtz STR
~NE40 with transparent‐
grayish & whitish Qtz +
<<Hematite (after sulfide) as
cement ~80‐40%. Host rock:
PQP with weak phyllic , PyOx
<1%, weak hematite in
B14270 537865 3365300 fractures. 0.031 1 9 40 60 10 0 0
Grab sample, strong‐moderate
silicification & stockwork of
drussy whitish‐grayish Qtz +
<<Hematite stockwork with
general trend NW30‐10 & NE
40 diping 70‐85. Host rock
B14271 537808 3365213 PQP, no clear texture. 0.248 1 49 30 10 50 7 0
moderate < 1mm drussy Qtz
B14272 537932 3365058 stockwork, with general trend 0.016 0 24 30 40 20 0 0

NE 10 , also drussy & weak
banded Qtz +<< hematite
stockwork, host rock: reddish
sandstone rock with weak
phyllic & PyOx traces
90 cm of sample , grayish‐
whitish drussy Qtz vein
(NW25/75), Hematite + black
mineral in cavities, hosted in
rock with moderate phyllic
alteration & moderate
silicification also with PyOx>1%
B14273 537170 3364649 diss (cubic) "old working" 0.343 13 217 4320 3290 60 0 0
70 cm of sample, whitish‐
transparent‐grayish &
amethyst Qtz vein (NW25/85),
Hematite + black mineral in
cavities, hosted in intrusive
rock (k‐feldespar, plag, Qtz)
with moderate phyllic
alteration & weak‐mod
30 cm of sample, drussy
grayish‐whitish Qtz vein
(SE25/80), Hematite + black
mineral? in cavities, hosted in
intrusive rock with moderate
phyllic alteration & moderate
40 cm of sample, grayish‐
whitish & amethyst drussy Qtz
vein (SE30/75) weak hematite
in cavities, hosted KFPQ with
B14276 537308 3364382 moderate silicification 0.059 0 16 100 190 20 0 0
Moderate whitish‐transparent
& <<grayish drussy & not
drussy Qtz + <Hematite (after
sulfide) stockwork with trend
NW40, NE30 & N‐S , hosted in
PQP with moderate silicified
patches, sericite traces, PyOx
B14277 537901 3365132 <1% 0.059 0 9 30 30 0 0 0
Moderate 1‐3 cm whitish‐
transparent & <grayish drussy
Qtz & Qtz + <Hematite (NW‐
SE15‐40/70‐80) stockwork,
weak Hematite & Limonite in
fractures, hosted in PQP with
weak silicification PQP, sericite
B14278 537867 3365107 traces 0.017 0 6 20 50 0 0 0
50 cm of NE20/75 breccia STR
(85% Qtz) with transparent‐
whitish & grayish Qtz +
oxidized sulfide traces, weak
B14279 537850 3365157 Hematite as cavities infill of 0.981 6 8 40 30 0 0 0

drussy Qtz open space. Host
rock PQP with moderate
silicified patches, PyOx <1%,
weak drussy Qtz + <Hematite
sto
1.2 m sample, strong gray‐
grayish & whitish Qtz +
<oxidized sulfide (mainly
Pyrite) & Qtz + <Py banded
drussy Qtz stockwork &
breccia, with trend NW30‐40 &
NE30‐40/70‐90. Strong
B14280 537777 3365188 silicified Qtz sandstone. 0.348 4 23 60 30 0 0 0
30 cm of sample, drussy calcite
vein?? With sphalerite + Gn
diss & calcite crystals
(SE35/75), hosted in
plagioclase‐biotite rich
intrusive with moderate
propylithic alteration, weak
phyllic & very weak
30 cm of sample, grayish
withish drussy Qtz vein
SE30/40, hosted in
intrusive with moderate
propylitic & weak phyllic
B14283 537221 3364271 alteration 0.055 1 93 450 1500 0 0 0
20 cm of wide whitish‐grayish
Qtz vein (SE40/60), Hematite +
<<black mineral in cavities,
hosted in plagioclase‐biotite
rich intrusive rock with
moderate propylitic alteration,
weak phyllic & very weak
Grayish‐whitish banded drussy
Qtz vein ~40 cm of wide
(NW70/high angle), hosted in
intrusive rock with prophylitic
alteration, weak phyllic & weak
1 m sample, breccia STR
(SE30/75) with grayish
transparent & whitish drussy
Qtz + Hematite (after sulfide)
cement & veining (10 cm). Host
rock gray plag + <Biotite + Qtz
(kind of PQP) with weak
patches of mod phyllic & PyOx
B14286 537695 3365189 diss <1% 0.221 0 78 600 490 0 0 0
1 m sample, moderate grayish‐
whitish drussy Qtz + Hematite
B14287 537674 3365159 (after sulfide) stockwork 0.025 0 67 170 100 10 0 0

(N00/55). Host rock Qtz
sandstone, contact zone with
PQP.
1 m of sample, grayish‐
whithish drussy Qtz vein
(25NW/85) with black mineral
& MnOx in cavities, <<hematite
in cavities, sporadic PyOx
boxwork, Gn+sph tracesin vein,
weak‐moderate phyllic &
B14288 537024 3364377 weak‐moderate silicification 0.322 5 55 6690 1750 0 0 0
whithish drussy Qtz vein(30
SE/80)with hematite + black
mineral <<MnOx in cavities,
also observed pyboxwork,
hosted in dike rock (PGB) with
mod prophylithic & phyllic
alteration, weak‐moderate
whithish drussy Qtz vein (35‐40
SE/70) with hematite + << Gn,
black sulfide?, << limonite in
cavities, hosted in intrusive
rock (KfPQ) with weak phyllic &
B14290 537111 3364228 weak moderate silicification 0.052 3 186 3400 50 10 0 0
30 cm of sample, whithish‐
grayish drussy Qtz vein (65
SE/70), hosted in intrusive rock
with moderate phyllic
alteration & moderate
whithish drussy Qtz vein (25
NW/65) with pyboxwork,
hematite+zzblack mineral &
MnOx in fractures, hosted in
intrusive rock (KfPQ) with
1m of sample, grayish‐whithish
drussy Qtz vein (60 NW/60),
hematite + black mineral &
MnOx py boxwork hosted in
PGB rock (dike) with moderate
propylithic alteration, weak
moderate phyllic & weak
30 cm of underground sample,
including 20 cm of grayish‐
whitish drussy Qtz vein
(SE10/50) & 10 cm of foot wall
rock, Hematite + <<Black
B14294 536788 3364305 mineral & MnOx traces, Py? 1.445 1 46 660 31900 10 0 0

Boxwork. Host rock: KfPQ with
moderate phyllic & weak‐
moderate silicification.
1.5 m sample, grayish‐whitish
drussy Qtz vein (N‐S/ high
angle) with black mineral and
MnOx + <<Hematite in cavities,
hosted in reddish sandstone (?)
with moderte phyllic &
B14295 536881 3364236 moderate silicification. 2.470 14 156 5020 480 20 0 0
of grayish‐whitish drussy Qtz
vein (NE10/65), Hematite +
<<Black mineral & MnOx traces
in cavities, 60 cm of sample
with tiny drussy Qtz veinlets,
hosted in KfPQ with moderate
B14296 536900 3364360 phyllic and silicification. 0.019 0 18 560 19800 0 0 0
60 cm of sample grayish‐
NW/ 85), weak
hematite+<<limonite + <<black
mineral in cavities, 1% py
dissem & boxwork, sporadic
calcite crystals, hosted in
intrusive rock (f‐Qt‐lithics =
arkosic sandstone rock) with
B14297 536953 3364061 moderate phyl 1.130 17 148 12300 2050 40 26 0
1.20 cm of sample, grayish‐
NW/55), moderate hematite +
<<limonite + << black mineral
in cavities, MnOx traces,
hosted in sandstone rock (
arkosic) with weak moderate
phyllic & weak‐ moderate
60 cm of sample , including 30
cm grayish‐whithish Qtz vein
(55NE/45) with hematite +<<
limonite , py < 1% dissem, 30
cm of sample with shale rock
with weak hematite in
fractures, hosted in shale rock
with weak phylli & weak
1.10 m of sample, grayish‐
NW/85) with moderate
hematite + << limonite + black
mineral (after sulfide), hosted
in intrusive rock (KfPQ) with
moderate phyllic & moderate
STR NW10/70, 1.2 m sample,
B14301 537325 3364998 including 15 cm of 1) whitish‐ 0.168 9 56 1710 1770 30 0 0

gray Qtz vein, rest of sample
includes moderate 2) gray‐
grayish drussy & banded Qtz,
Qtz + Hematite, & Qtz + <Black
mineral stockwork, &
groundmass of reddish Arkosic
(?) sand
STR NE05/70, 70 cm sample,
strong gray & <whitish‐grayish
non‐drussy and drussy Qtz
stockwork or weak breccia
structure, Qtz + <Hematite
(after sulfide) & Qtz +
<Limonite (after Py), patches of
moderate Hematite, late stage
B14302 537328 3364969 of whitish drussy Qtz. Patche 0.587 7 40 1720 750 20 5 0
80 cm sample, breccia
Structure with trend NW15/70
(<component NE30/70) & with
grayish‐<<greenish Qtz cement
(50%) and PyOx 1%, and
moderate grayish drussy Qtz
stockwork (late stage). Host
rock reddish sandstone
B14303 537363 3364956 sequence. 0.055 1 13 660 320 20 29 0
1.1m, moderate whitish to
grayish drussy Qtz +
<<Hematite stockwork NW20‐
30/70‐80, hosted in beige
sandstone with weak‐
moderate silicification, PyOx
B14304 537401 3364948 disseminate <1%. 0.033 0 23 250 200 0 0 0
(SW30‐40/70) with ~70‐90% of
gray‐whitish Qtz cement (Qtz +
Oxidized sulfide traces) &
moderate 1‐3 mm grayish
drussy Qtz + Hematite
stockwork (SE40/65). Host
rock: reddsih sandstone
sequence with weak phyllic, &
B14305 537449 3364930 weak Chlorite 0.365 6 425 340 1290 0 0 60
Chinos Altos structures
projection, NW30/65, 40 cm
breccia Qtz structure with 70‐
80% of Qtz cement, patches
with moderate Hematite (after
sulfide), also gray & whitish
drussy Qtz + <oxidized sulfide
as cement. Host rock: reddsih
B14306 537370 3364999 sandstone. 0.593 30 143 7970 310 60 78 0
60 cm sample, STR NW50/55,
breccia structure with ~30%
Qtz as cement, including gray
drussy Qtz + black mineral &
B14307 537281 3365109 Qtz + Hematite (oxidized 1.190 17 40 3210 310 40 39 0

sulfide), & moderate Qtz +
Hematite stockwork. Host rock:
reddsih sandstone. Moderate
silicified zone.
1.2 m sample, STR NW60/45,
breccia Qtz vein, gray & whitish
Qtz, fragments replaced by
Hematite‐<Limonite, Qtz
B14308 537258 3365117 cement 60%. 0.514 19 24 1720 20 0 0 0
1.0 m sample, moderate 1‐2
mm Hematite + <Qtz & late
stage of Qtz + <<Hematite (afer
N0‐NW10 & NW50/70‐80. Host
B14309 537298 3365160 rock: Beige sandstone. 0.073 0 0 40 40 10 0 0
80 cm sample, moderate 1‐3
mm whitish & <grayish Qtz &
Qtz + Hematite stockwork,
NW10 & NW40 & NE40, hosted
in reddish sandstone
sequence, weak phyllic and
silicification, weak Hematite &
Limonite c/fractures, PyOx
B14310 537324 3365181 traces. 0.205 0 9 10 40 10 0 0
1 m sample, moderate 1‐5 mm
gray and whitish Qtz & Qtz +
<Hematite stockwork,
NW30/85, NW60/50 &
SE30/65. Host rock: beige fine
grain sandstone with weak
phyllic and silicification, PyOx
B14311 537398 3365077 traces. 0.029 1 6 10 340 0 0 0
gray & <whitish drussy Qtz +
Hematite (after sulfide) as
cement, moderate Hematite‐
Limonite patches or alterated
B14312 537449 3364978 fragments (?). 0.207 9 47 1630 470 20 0 0
breccia Qtz structure (~40%
Qtz), gray Qtz + <Hematite &
late stage of transparent‐
amethyst drussy Qtz, moderate
Hematite content, PQP
fragments with silicification &
phyllic‐argillic. Host rock PQP
B14313 537374 3365034 with weak phyllic and sili 0.124 4 70 580 50 20 0 0
70 cm sample, moderate &
weak brecciate structure with
transparent‐<grayish drussy
Qtz + <<oxidized sulfide
stockwork with trend
NW15/65, weak Hematite
c/fractures, weak phyllic &
B14314 537403 3365020 <argillic PQP, PyOx ~1%. 0.071 1 28 130 140 0 0 0

Grab sample, moderate‐weak
1‐10 mm transparent‐whitish
drussy Qtz + <Hematite
stockwork with trend NW‐
<SE10‐30/70‐80, weak‐
moderate Hematite
c/fractures, moderate‐strong
silicified folded beige
sandstone, weak sericite
B14315 537425 3365041 patches, PyOx <1%. 0.056 0 18 240 70 0 0 0
50 cm sample, whitish‐gray Qtz
+ <<Hematite‐Limonite (after
sulfide) vein with trend NW60‐
70/40, crosscut by moderate
whitish drussy Qtz stockwork
with trend SE20‐40/70‐80 that
deplace 15 cm to main NW
structure. Host rock: moderate
B14316 537464 3364999 silcified reddish sa 0.146 1 12 40 790 30 0 0
25 cm wide sample, gray &
<whitish drussy banded Qtz +
Hematite‐<<Limonite (after
sulfide) + Galena traces, Qtz
veining with trend NW30/70.
Note: wall rock with moderate‐
weak 1‐3 cm drussy Qtz +
B14317 537477 3364964 <Hematite stockwork. 4.080 9 155 5510 660 60 0 0
NW35/55 Qtz + moderate
Hematite (content) breccia
structure & Qtz veining, also
whitish‐transparent drussy Qtz
+ <<Hematite stockwork,
banding of Qtz?Qtz +
Hematite?Hematite + <Qtz,
sporadic patches of ~2% of
unoxidized Py + <Galena + <Cu
B14318 537495 3364942 sulfide?, mala 1.565 8 207 3860 50 30 0 0
Grab sample, moderate 1‐3
mm whitish‐transparent Qtz +
<Hematite stockwork with
trend NE10/70‐80 &
<NW40/60‐70, moderate to
weak Hematite content,
hosted in moderate to strong
silicified beige fine grain
B14319 537519 3365109 sandstone. PyOx traces. 0.067 2 21 240 280 0 0 0
1 m sample, moderate 1‐3 mm
drussy Qtz + <<Hem +
<Limonite stockwork with
trend NW‐SE35/60‐70; hosted
in contact zone & fault contact
of PQP & fine grain beige
sandstone (FBSS) with
moderate to strong
silicification & whitish Qtz
B14320 537527 3365077 stockwork, weak Hematit 0.184 1 90 590 1530 0 0 0

cm of grayish‐whithis Qtz vein
(NW25 /65) with hematite
<<black mineral in cavities, 20
cm of sample with reedish
sandstone rock with tiny Qtz
veinlents, vein hosted in
reedish sandstone rock with
B14321 536655 3364827 weak phyllic & weak‐moder 0.354 1 60 510 510 10 0 0
cm of grayish‐whithish drussy
Qtz vein (bull Qtz) (NW 15/75),
20 cm of sample (hanging wall)
FeOx & black mineral in traces,
10 cm (foot wall) reedish
sandstone with FeOx traces &
B14322 536546 3364852 black mineral 0.610 1 108 2030 630 10 0 0
Qtz vein(NE 10/60), hematite +
black mineral in cavities, 20 cm
of sandstone rock with tiny Qtz
veinlents , weak phyllic & weak
silicification , hosted in reedish
B14323 536540 3364955 sandstone rock with weak phyll 0.458 1 99 670 440 10 0 0
grayish & whithish drussy Qtz
vein (NW50/85) weak hematite
+black mineral in cavities,
hosted in reddish sandstone
rock with weak phyllic
B14324 536469 3364949 alteration & weak silicification 0.504 42 89 1430 1140 30 5 0
70 cm of wide, including 30 cm
grayish‐whithish drussy Qtz
vein (40 NW/80), hematite
traces +<< black mineral in
cavities hosted in intrusive
rock with weak phyllic & weak‐
30 cm of sample , whithish‐
grayish Qtz vein (NW20 /60) ,
weak hematite in cavities &
MnOx traces, hosted in rock
with moderate silicification &
weak‐moderate phyllic
B14326 536505 3364568 alteration 0.089 9 11 200 860 20 7 0
whithish drussy Qtz vein (NW
5/65) with
hematite+<<limonite in
cavities+py boxwork diss <1%,
B14327 536500 3364680 argillic alteration 1.245 6 203 5710 1190 160 71 0
whithish drussy Qtz vein (
B14328 536508 3364885 NE20/70) with black mineral & 0.686 6 203 13700 720 1110 321 0

hematite in cavities, hosted in
weak‐moderate silicification
drussy Qtz vein (NW15/60)
with hematite + black mineral
in cavities hosted in rock with
moderate silicification & weak
drussy Qtz vein & microbreccia
structure ( NW15/high angle)
with weak‐moderate
hematite+black mineral &
MnOx in cavities,pyboxwork
<1%, hosted in reddish
sandstone rock with weak
phyllic & weak‐moderate
Grab sample, weak to
moderate 1‐2 mm transparent
drussy Qtz + <Hematite
stockwork SE10‐40/60, and
weak early stage of grayish‐
whitish Qtz stockwork
SW80/45. Host rock: PQP with
moderate phyllic & weak
Hematite & <Limonite
B14331 537561 3365033 c/fractures. 0.129 0 17 190 430 20 0 0
drussy Qtz + <Hematite (few
patches, after sulfide) veining,
hosted in moderate silicified
patches of PQP rock, PyOx
<1%, & <late stage of amethyst
B14332 537584 3365050 drussy Qtz. 0.230 5 95 730 1250 30 0 0
50 cm sample, whitish‐
transparent & <grayish drussy
Qtz + <Hematite (oxidized
sulfide) + <Un‐oxidized Galena‐
Sphalerite viening with trend
NW30‐40/60‐70, hosted in
purple plagioclase rich (40%) &
aphanitic groundmass rock
(flow? within reddish
B14333 537613 3364946 sandstone 0.235 2 65 1090 640 20 0 0
40 cm sample, breccia vein STR
with trend NW10/70 with
grayish‐whitish‐transparent
banded drussy Qtz + <Oxidized
sulfide (Hematite & <Limonite)
cement, hosted in reddish
sandstone with weak Qtz
B14334 537542 3364974 veinlets & phyllic (selective). 0.216 3 120 1030 460 40 0 0
B14335 537499 3365013 70 cm sample with moderate 0.239 1 41 280 250 20 0 0

whitish‐grayish drussy & weak
banded Qtz veining with trend
NW05/70, including Qtz +
<Hematite & <Qtz + moderate
Hematite veining, and weak
late stage of Hematite infill of
cavities of drussy open space.
STR NW55/75, 80 cm sample,
breccia Qtz vein STR,
transparent‐whitish & <grayish
Qtz + <oxidized sulfide as
cement, also weak banding of
Qtz + Hematite stockwork,
weak MnOx c/fratures. Host
B14336 537524 3365256 rock PQP. 0.185 1 25 200 290 20 0 0
80 cm sample, weak to
moderate 1‐2 mm whitish‐
grayish Qtz stockwork & Qtz +
Hematite stockwork with
trend NW40‐50/65‐70, &
moderate silicified patches in
PQP rock, PyOx disseminate
~2%, weak Limonite
B14337 537526 3365272 c/fractures, and weak phyllic. 0.034 2 35 1310 190 10 0 0
Sample 1.2 m,
gray?transparent‐amethyst Qtz
& <whitish drussy Qtz cement
of breccia STR (NW40/65), also
Qtz + <oxidized sulfide?Hem‐
Limonite (oxidize sulfide) &
<Goethite banding. STR hosted
in contact of Qtz‐sandstone &
B14338 537605 3365163 PQP. 0.144 2 32 1230 110 10 0 0
40 cm sample, weak breccia
STR (NW‐SE40/85) with ~15‐
30% of whitish‐transparent
sulfide) as cement. Host rock:
weak silicified PQP, and weak
B14339 537554 3365102 Limonite c/fractures. 0.083 0 21 80 40 10 0 0
STR (NW‐SE30/80‐90) with ~5‐
10% of whitish‐transparent
drussy Qtz + <<Hematite (after
sulfide) as stockwork or
cement. Host rock: phyllic and
silicified BFSS (beige fine grain
B14340 537480 3365168 sandstone). 0.045 0 14 60 1080 20 0 0
1.5 m sample, moderate 1‐10
mm gray‐transparent &
<whitish drussy Qtz stockwork,
Qtz & <Hematite (after sulfide)
stockwork with trend NW‐
SE30‐40/80‐90. Note ~10m
with moderate silicification
B14341 537404 3365208 halo. 0.407 1 62 510 90 10 0 0

Moderate‐strong silicified FGSS
(fine grain sandstone, 0.5 mm
grain size) with moderate
grayish‐transparent drussy Qtz,
traces of Hematite patches as
drusy cavities infill. Stockwork
B14342 537452 3365261 with trend ~NW30. 0.212 1 21 280 20 10 0 0
mm grayish‐whitish irregular &
few drussy Qtz stockwork &
also late stage of blackish‐gray
Qtz stockwork. Host rock:
reddish sandstone with wek
phyllic, patches of Limonite,
PyOx <1%, & weak Hematite
B14343 537492 3365212 c/fractures. Main fault a 0.062 0 5 180 180 0 0 0
50 cm Qtz breccia STR (NW40‐
50) with 90% of gray drussy
Qtz + <Black mineral‐MnOx &
transparent drussy Qtz +
<oxidized sulfide (Hematite‐
Limonite) as cement. Host
rock: contact between fine
grain beige sandstone & weak
propylitic volcanosediment
B14344 537579 3365303 sequen 0.160 0 35 120 10 20 0 0
1.2 m sample, includes 20 cm
of vein STR of grayish‐whitish
Qtz+<Hematite & calcite
crystals replaced by Qtz, rest of
sample includes drussy banded
Qtz veining with gray
Qtz?whitish Qtz +
<<Hematite?Hematite + Black
mineral + <Qtz banding.Trend
B14345 537655 3365245 of struc 0.021 0 0 10 560 0 0 0
mm few drussy and banded
whitish & gray Qtz + <<Hem‐
Lim (after sulfide) stockwork
with trend SE25‐40/65‐80 &
NE20. Host rock: moderate
silicified PQP, Sericite traces,
locally with weak Hematite
B14346 537770 3365253 c/fractures. 0.263 2 61 1230 990 30 0 0
~40 cm breccia structure
(NW30) with 5% of grayish
drussy Qtz & <Qtz+<<Hematite
infill, hosted in pikish dike?
with weak‐moderate silicified
groundmass & PyOx <1%, wall
rock with weak propylitic
B14347 537650 3365460 alteration. 0.152 1 64 580 800 30 10 0
STR (like B14247) with trend
NW20/60, and with grayish‐
B14348 537565 3365404 transparent drussy Qtz + 0.945 1 103 520 700 30 0 0

<<Hematite infill, weak MnOx
c/fractures, weak ohyllic and
silicification in STR. Wall rock
with weak propylitic.
1.5m with moderate whitish‐
transparent drussy Qtz
stockwork (NW20/80) and Qtz
+ <oxidized sulfide, moderate
silicified VSS?
(volcanosediments) in STR,
B14349 537499 3365346 PyOx ~1%. 0.142 1 63 200 400 30 0 0
mm grayish‐transparent drussy
Qtz + Hematite stockwork
NW50/75, also weak MnOx
c/fractures. Host rock: Qtz‐
sandstone with moderate
mm transparent drussy Qtz +
<Limonite‐Goethite stockwork
and moderate Lim‐Goethite‐
<Hem c/fractures, & weak
phyllic overprinting to
propylitic, hoted in VSS (AKSS‐
arkosic sandstone). Note 3 m
B14351 537423 3365308 wide alteration. 0.111 14 68 300 50 40 0 0
STR as dike trend NW55,
breccia STR with transparent‐
grayish & <whitish drussy Qtz
infill ~10‐15%, hosted in
pinkish k‐feldspar + Qtz dike
(Rhyolic?) with moderate
silicified patches and sporadic
B14352 537399 3365303 phyllic patches. Note: ~2 m of 0.022 0 19 10 2090 10 0 0
80 cm sample, breccia Qtz vein
STR (~Qtz 90%) with gray‐
transparent Qtz + <<oxidized
sulfide & oxidized sulfide +
<Qtz, Hematite‐Limonite as
moderate patches, hosted in
the contact of PQP and
greenish tuff (VSS sequence),
B14353 537229 3365283 silicification overprinting to 0.424 3 154 4570 1890 10 0 0
NW/80) withweak hematite +
<< limonite & black mineral in
cavities, hosted in PGB rock
with moderate propylithic
alteration & moderate phyllic
B14354 536592 3364248 & weak‐moderate silicification 3.670 3 79 1010 3430 30 0 0
whithish drussy Qtz veining/
B14355 536626 3364211 vein (15 NW/60) with 0.310 1 359 7620 740 50 14 0

moderate hematite + <<
limonite in cavities, black
mineral + MnOx traces, hosted
in PGB rock with weak
propylithic & moderate
silicification
whithish drussy Qtz vein with
moderate hematite +<<lmt in
cavities, black mineral & MnOx
traces, hosted in PGB rock
with moderate propylithics &
weak.moderate phyllic
alteration, weak‐moderate
(SE40/80)with moderate
hematite + <<lmt in cavities,
black mineral & MnOx traces,
hosted in PGB rock with
B14357 536724 3364040 propylithic alteration 0.198 3 390 8680 9480 20 0 0
grayish, banded drussy Qtz
vein (30 NW/35) with black
mineral & MnOx in cavities +
hematite + << limonite in
fractures, hosted in rock with
whithish banded drussy Qtz
vein (60/75), moderate
hematite &moderate black
mineral in cavities, also
observed crisocole (CuSiO2) +
Gn + sph dissem , hosted
contact intrusive/shale rocks
with moderate phyllic &
B14359 536632 3364113 moderate propylithi 0.752 10 773 8830 1420 70 0 0
whithish drussy Qtz vein (
SW15/60), weak‐moderate
hematite + <<limonite traces in
cavities, black mineral (after
sulfide) +<< MnOx traces,
hosted in KfPQ rock with weak‐
moderate phyllic & weak‐
Qtz vein with mod hematite +
<<limonite in cavities & black
mineral+MnOx traces, 15 cm of
tiny drussy tiny Qtz veinlents
B14361 536438 3364098 with moderate hematite 0.071 1 50 460 2060 40 0 0

+<<limonite (traces), hosted in
KfPQ rock with mo
cm of grayish‐whithish Qtz vein
(NW 35?/?)with weak
hematite+<<black mineral, 25
cm with tiny Qtz stwk +
moderate hematite in
fractures, hosted in rock with
B14362 536347 3364375 silicification, weak propylithic 2.380 4 206 1800 2580 10 0 0
whithish drussy + amethyst Qtz
vein with moderate‐strong
hematite (FeOx) in fractures +
black mineral, crisocole,
azurita, malachite, galene &
sphalerite <1% diss, hosted in
KfPQ rock with silicification &
B14363 536097 3364625 moderate phyllic alte 2.440 3 513 6930 0 520 188 0
grayish drussy Qtz vein (SE
35/55) with black mineral &
MnOx traces, << hematite
traces in cavities, pyOx dissem
> 1% dissem, hosted in
sandstone rock with low‐
B14364 536421 3363789 weak‐moderate silicification 0.032 3 70 390 600 10 8 0
whithish banded drussy Qtz
vein (SE 40/45) with black
mineral + MnOx + hematite in
cavities, hosted in rock with
moderate phyllic & mod
Grab sample, moderate 0.3‐5
cm transparent & <grayish
drussy Qtz stockwork, & <late
stage of Hematite as drussy
cavities infill. Trend of
stockwork NW60/75, hosted in
B14366 537293 3365352 beige‐pinkish Qtz sandstone. 0.000 0 12 40 1110 0 0 0
70 cm sample, STR locally with
trend NW70/55 & general
trend NW10‐15/30‐50, weak
breccia structure with
transparent and gray Qtz?
Goethite‐<Hematite‐<Limonite
drussy‐banded as stockwork or
cement. Host rock greenish
fine grain tuff (Andesitic? tuff)
B14367 537371 3365341 & V 0.474 2 219 2010 480 10 0 0
(S00‐SW25/70‐80) with ~10‐
B14368 537332 3365445 15% whitish‐grayish & 0.127 0 25 260 200 10 0 0

transparent drussy Qtz +
<<Hematite (late stage) of
cement. Host rock: Beige
pinkish Qtz‐sandstone with
moderate silicification.
80 cm sample, STR SE15/70,
~40% of grayish‐transparent
weak banded Qtz?Black
mineral + <Qtz and drussy Qtz
cement in breccia structure,
B14369 537372 3365467 hosted in PQP. 0.091 0 33 260 40 20 0 0
70 cm sample, weak &
<moderate 1‐3 mm whitish
drussy Qtz stockwork with
trend NE15 & NW40/70‐80.
Hosted in beige fine grain
sandstone with weak phyllic
and silicification, PyOx
disseminte <1%, Hematite
B14370 537187 3365375 traces. 1.495 1 10 20 80 0 0 0
80 cm with weak to moderate
transparent‐<whitish‐<grayish
drussy Qtz stockwork & veining
NW10/80, hosted in gray PQP
with weak silicified patches,
PyOx traces, Chlorite veinlets
B14371 537254 3365424 traces, sercite traces. 0.268 0 26 80 540 0 0 0
1m sample, weak to moderate
<1‐5 cm grayish‐transparent &
whitish Qtz + <Hematite (after
NW20/50‐60 & NW40/50. Host
rock PQP wth weak
silicification, PyOx traces,
B14373 537383 3365522 Sericite traces. 0.055 0 34 170 50 0 0 0
STR SW30/75, 1.2 m sample,
breccia structure with ~40% of
transparent‐<grayish & whitish
drussy Qtz + <<Hematite (after
sulfide) as cement, hosted in
PQP with weak Hematite
c/fractures (only in structure)
B14374 537363 3365535 & weak silicified patches. 0.108 0 11 30 660 30 0 0
90 cm sample, STR NW10/60 &
NW40/75, including grayish
drussy Qtz stockwork & breccia
with Qtz 15%, and also early
stage of black mineral + <Qtz
as stockwork or banding of
black mineral + <Qtz?grayish‐
transparent drussy Qtz. Host
B14375 537332 3365491 rock: PQP with weak sil 0.121 0 100 1300 1830 30 0 0
NW40/80 STR, 40 cm sample,
few banded transparent‐
grayish & whitish Qtz & <Qtz +
B14376 537282 3365514 Hematite (after sulfide) as 5.700 96 88 1780 320 60 0 0

breccia structure cement, &
fragments replaced by
moderate MnOx (&
c/fractures, fresh Py traces.
Host rock: FGSS (beige
sandstone) with moderat
transparent‐<whitish drussy
with trend NW40/65 & <NW60
& <<NE40‐50, hosted in FGSS‐
AKSS with weak silicification &
Limonite in groundmass (PyOx
B14377 537222 3365521 <1%). Shallow old working. 0.147 2 18 210 80 0 0 0
1.5 m sample, moderate <1
mm Hem + <Li + <Qtz
stockwork in several trends
(mostly NW60) & weak Qtz +
<Hematite stockwork with
trend SE60/70. Hosted in PQP
with weak phyllic &
silicification, PyOx traces. Few
to moderate Hematite + <Lim
B14378 537190 3365231 c/fractures. 0.016 0 11 100 20 0 0 0
1.2 m sample, moderate first
stage gray‐transparent Qtz +
<Black mineral & second stage
of Qtz + Hematite (after
NW10/80, hosted in contat of
PQP/Qtz‐sandstone with
moderate silicification and
B14379 537132 3365033 with weak phyllic, also trans 0.103 0 0 0 200 10 0 0
Moderate 1‐2 mm Qtz +
Hematite & Qtz + <Hematite +
<<Limonite (after sulfide) with
trend NW‐SE40‐60/70‐85,
hosted in reddish sandstone
with weak phyllic and
B14380 537109 3364983 silcification. 0.600 0 22 550 0 0 0 0
60 cm of sample, strucuture
+grayish drussy Qtz vein with
moderate hematite (after
sulfide) + <<limonite traces in
cavities , py boxwork? , hosted
in rock (20% plagioclase, 5%
biotite remplaced by chlorite ,
epidote traces) with moderate
B14381 536464 3365657 propylitic & m 0.115 2 63 2390 2960 30 0 0
grayish drussy Qtz vein (NW
15/40) with moderate
hematite + << limonite traces,
black mineral + MnOx in
fractures , hosted in reddish
sandstone rock with weak‐
B14382 536122 3364810 moderate phyllic alteration 1.970 56 160 13000 800 0 0 0

whitish‐grayish drussy banded
Qtz vein = 60 cm of wide (NW 5
/ 75) with moderate hematite
+<< limonite (traces),
blackmineral+<<MnOx , hosted
in KfPQ rock with moderate
B14383 535850 3364808 silicification & moderate phyllic 1.135 2 80 1660 4700 20 0 0
70 cm of sample, including
whithish & grayish tiny (3 cm
of wide) Qtz veining (NW 40 /
65) , weak hematite +<<
limonite in cavities , black
mineral + MnOx in fractures &
PyOx dissem, hosted in KfPQ
rock with moderate phyllic &
B14384 535787 3364964 weak propylitic 0.250 2 200 560 2680 50 0 0
70 cm of sample, including
whithish‐grayish Qtz veining
(NW35/75 general trend ) with
weak‐moderate hematite +<<
limonite in traces, black
mineral traces +<<MnOx in
fractures hosted in KfPQ rock
with weak‐moderate phyllic &
B14385 535668 3364990 weak propylitic 7.510 2 77 860 1880 50 0 0
80 cm of sample , structure
(NW 25/75) with whithish‐
grayish Qtz veining &
microbreccia with weak
moderate hematite in fractures
hosted in shale / sandstone
rock with weak phyllic
B14386 537265 3365653 alteration 0.239 2 11 40 70 100 12 0
structure (SE 10/high angle),
grab sample = 1.5 metros ,
including tiny grayish &
whithish Qtz veinlents hosted
in beige sandstone rock with
weak‐moderate hematite in
fractures, black mineral +
MnOx traces, weak phyllic
B14387 537282 3365600 alteration 0.871 49 46 290 340 20 14 0
B14388 537266 3365556 3.120 197 96 660 610 20 72 0
whithish Qtz vein (SE 10/85),
with weak hematite +<<
limonite in traces, black
mineral in traces, hosted in
beige sandstone rock with
B14389 537230 3365540 weak phyllic 0.482 16 80 900 480 30 0 0
whithish drussy Qtz vein +
breccia structure (NE
10/65)with weak‐mod
hematite in fractures + black
B14390 537155 3365472 mineral +<< MnOx traces, 1.230 20 132 1760 1330 40 10 0

hosted inbeige sandstone rock
with weak phyllic
Grab sample, STR NW30/60,
moderate drusy Qtz stockwork
& moderate‐strong
silicification, PyOx disseminate
~3‐5%, & sporadic patches of
unoxidized Py ~5%. Host rock:
Shale? & Limestone (partly to
strong silicification or
replacement patches), also
B14391 537148 3365242 weak p 0.164 7 14 50 60 100 18 0
70 cm sample, weak brecciate
STR, & main fracturing
NW50/55‐60, weak &
moderate silcified patches, &
grayish‐whitish drussy Qtz as
stockwork or patches of weak
brecia STR. Host rock: blackish
shale with weak silcified
patches & phyllic, weak
B14392 537124 3365228 Hematite c/ 0.206 7 30 440 460 60 0 0
60 cm STR with out clear trend
(~NE25/70), breccia STR with
10‐20% & up to 40% of
transparent‐grayish & whitish
drussy Qtz as cement,
moderate silicified patches in
fragments. Host rock: 0.2‐0.5
mm grain size beige feldspar‐
B14393 537098 3365211 <Qtz sandstone with weak phyl 0.201 15 56 250 540 10 0 0
of whitish‐grayish &
transparent drussy Qtz breccia
vein (70% Qtz), and rest of
sample with moderate 1‐5 mm
Qtz stockwork. Host rock: fine
grain beige sandstone with
weak phyllic and silicification,
B14394 537060 3365149 PyOx 1%. STR average tre 0.119 2 33 360 430 0 0 0
1.5 m sample, strong
weathered STR, breccia STR
with ~15‐20% of whitish‐gray &
transparent drussy Qtz as
cement or stockwork, hosted
in fine grain size with weak‐
moderate phyllic, PyOx <1%.
STR trend ~NW10, also
<<SE60/80 Qtz stockwork.
B14395 537092 3364964 Moderate Hemati 0.218 1 35 1130 390 10 0 0
mm grayish‐<transparent &
whitish drussy Qtz + <Hematite
(after sulfide) stockwork
NW20‐40/70, probably main
fault structure NW40/70,
B14396 537038 3365049 hosted in 0.5 mm grain size 0.031 1 7 30 20 20 0 0

massive beige sandstone with
weak silicified groundmass,
PyOx <
30 cm structure, grayish &
whitish‐transparent & <late
stage of amethyst Qtz, breccia
Qtz vein STR, sporadic patches
of Hematite as infill of cavities
of drussy Qtz, PyOx & oxidized
B14397 536998 3365030 sulfide <1%. 0.139 2 18 210 240 0 0 0
50 cm with weak‐moderate 2‐5
mm whitish drussy Qtz +
<oxidized sulfide (Hematite‐
Limonite) stockwork with trend
SE10/80, &15 cm with
moderate grayish and whitish
drussy Qtz & Qtz + <Hematite
stockwork w/ trend SE30/60.
Host rock: fine grain folded
B14398 536976 3365076 sands 2.270 2 13 430 820 0 0 0
(NW15/80) with ~10% of
transparent‐<grayish weak
banded drussy Qtz & Qtz +
Hematite as cement. Host rock:
moderate silicified fine grain
B14399 537095 3365235 beige sandstone. 0.152 1 24 280 510 30 0 0
60 sample, breccia STR
(SE40/60 locally) with gray and
white drussy Qtz +<Hematite
(after sulfide) as cement (20%
Qtz). Host rock: FGSS with
weak silicification & weak
B14400 537010 3365188 Limonite c/fractures, PyOx <1% 0.116 1 19 30 100 0 5 0
STR SE10/60, 50cm sample, 5‐
10% of transparent‐<grayish
drussy Qtz & Qtz + Hematite
(after sulfide) as weak breccia
STR or moderate Qtz
stockwork. Host rock: Fine
grain beige sandstone wit
weak‐moderate silicification,
B14401 536986 3365144 PyOx 1‐2% 0.724 2 94 910 600 0 32 0
1 m sample, SE40/60 breccia
structure, 20 cm of gray Qtz
breccia (~10%), and rest of
sample with moderate gray‐
transparent Qtz & Qtz +
<Hematite stockwork. Host
rock: Beige fine grain
sandstone with weak silicified
patches. Also weak Chlorite
B14402 536992 3365116 c/fractur 0.048 0 7 270 280 10 0 0
80 cm, moderate <1‐2 mm
gray‐transparent drussy Qtz +
B14403 536995 3365258 Hematite (after sulfide) 0.029 0 5 60 90 0 0 0

stockwork with trend mostly
SE35/80, & 15 cm moderate
silicification and weak breccia
STR. Host rock: weak silicified
and phyllic beige fine grain
sandsotne, PyOx 1‐2%
71 cm sample, STR SE50‐60/55‐
60, weak breccia or crackle
breccia STR (Qtz 5%),
transparent & grayish &
whitish drussy Qtz + Hematite
(after sulfide) stockwork or
crackle breccia infill, sporadic
moderate MnOx & Hematite
B14404 536944 3365287 c/fractures or cavities infill. H 0.217 1 12 810 440 10 30 0
~3 m selective grab sample, 10‐
20% Qtz STR, transparent‐
whitish & <gray Qtz +
<Hematite (after sulfide) as
cement, hosted in FGSS with
weak phyllic & silicification,
PyOx <1%, weak Limonite
c/fractures, no clear str trend,
B14405 537985 3365315 probably SE30/65 & NE‐SE40 st 0.052 0 6 20 20 20 0 0
STR NW20/50, 70 cm breccia
Qtz vein, Qtz 80%, whitish‐
transparent & grayish drussy
Qtz, fragments replaced by
moderate Hematite + clay, also
weak banded Qtz + <Black
mineral as late ? Stage, weak
B14406 537019 3365371 MnOx c/fractures. 0.566 10 33 900 280 50 18 0
of breccia Qtz vein w/ Qtz ~30‐
40%, grayish drussy Qtz +
<Hematite‐Limonite (after
sulfide), 3 mm PyOx crystals
~1%, rest of sample with
moderate Qtz stockwork, weak
B14407 537041 3365287 Lim c/fractures. STR Nw25/60. 0.033 1 8 80 60 10 0 0
of breccia STR (Qtz 15%) with
gray‐transparent Qtz +
<<Hematite (after sulfide) infill,
and rest of sample with
moderate to weak Qtz
stockwork mostly NE‐
SW30/80, main STR NE30/75.
Host rock: fine grain beige
B14408 537114 3365274 sandstone with 0.374 3 12 180 330 40 0 0
2 m grab sample, moderate
1‐3 mm drussy Qtz & Qtz +
stockwork and veining (5‐15
cm) with trend SE30‐50/75,
B14409 537077 3365314 moderate silcified fine grain 1.085 7 19 360 300 0 0 0

beige sandstone, PyOx <1%.
Dump sample of drussy
banded Qtz vein of 30‐40 cm
wide, transparent‐gray and
whitish Qtz and banding of
moderate Hemaite‐Limonite &
MnOx as patches &
<Qtz+<Hematite (after sulfide).
STR SE40/80. Host rock: fine
grain beige sandstone with
B14410 537050 3365418 weak silicifica 2.520 165 128 4110 720 30 13 0
50 cm sample, beige‐gray
sandstone with tiny bedding,
and moderate drussy Qtz +
<Hematite in bedding planes or
flow plane? (E00/55), & sample
includes 10 cm of irregular
drussy Qtz breccia (5% Qtz).
B14411 537047 3365455 Folded rock? Or flow. 14.400 23 20 160 230 10 5 0
1 m sample, moderate‐weak 1‐
2 mm drussy Qtz + <Hematite
(after sulfide) stockwork (NW‐
SE15/85 & SE65‐75/50‐60),
hosted in moderate to strong
silicified Qtz‐sandstone? (no
clear texture) overlaying to fine
B14412 537018 3365495 grain beige sandstone. 0.806 12 21 480 30 20 0 0
1.4 m grab sample, moderate
1‐5 mm gray‐transparent
sulfide) stockwork, and
beige sandstone, PyOx
disseminate 1‐2%, trend of
B14413 537049 3365510 stockwork NW‐SE75‐85/70‐80. 0.951 1 9 0 10 10 0 0
1.2 m sample, SE70/75 STR, 15
cm of breccia Qtz vein & rest of
sample include moderate 1‐3
mm grayish drussy Qtz +
Hematite (after sulfide)
stockwork & <whitish Qtz. Host
rock fine grain beige
sandstone, PyOx 1‐2%, weak
B14414 537089 3365495 phyllic and silcification. 0.098 1 20 60 140 20 0 0
30 cm of sample, grayish
drussy Qtz vein (40 NW/?) with
weak hematite +<< black
mineral +MnOx in fractures
hosted in KfPQ rock with weak
propylitic & weak mod‐phyllic
B14415 535829 3364685 alteration, weak silicification 0.183 1 69 1770 3120 10 0 0
55/?) with moderate hematite
B14416 535934 3364610 + weak‐moderate limonite, 0.046 4 30 90 200 90 81 0

black mineral +MnOx hosted in
KfPQ rock with weak phyllic
alteration
20/75) with moderate
hematite + <limonite in
cavities, black mineral
+<<MnOx traces, hosted in
KfPQ rock with moderate
phyllic alteration & weak
B14417 535944 3364517 propylitic 0.011 1 33 330 660 50 0 0
90 cm of sample, whithish &
bull Qtz vein (NW80/60) with
weak hematite +<< limonite,
black mineral +<< MnOx in
fractures & cavities, hosted in
rock with moderate propylitic
B14418 536129 3364333 alteration & weak phyllic 0.678 1 162 90 760 50 0 0
whithish drussy Qtz vein with
weak‐moderate hematite +<<
limonite in cavities & fractures,
fracures, hosted in rock with
weak‐moderate silicification,
B14419 536171 3364687 weak phyllic 2.650 2 218 2170 2270 80 0 0
2 m sample, STR NE15/50,
including 80 cm of whitish‐
<transparent‐gray Qtz +
Galena? & banding of Hematite
& Qtz + <Hematite vein, and
rest of sample as moderate Qtz
veining & breccia structure
with transparent‐whitish Qtz +
B14420 537152 3365479 Hematite, also fragments re 2.100 42 134 2430 920 60 11 0
1.2 m grab sample, including 1‐
15 cm of drussy weak banded
Qtz veining (transparent Qtz &
patches of Hematite + clay)
and stockwork with trend
NW10/75 & NE50/70‐80, &
<late stage of transparent‐
whitish drussy Qtz stockwork,
B14421 537165 3365524 hosted in rock with modera 0.671 6 37 270 300 30 0 0
20 cm sample, Qtz vein with
transparent‐whitish & <grayish
drussy Qtz + <<oxidized sulfide
with trend NE50/85, hosted in
weak to moderate silicified fine
grain sandstone‐Limestone?
B14422 537191 3365490 Sequence. 0.156 4 12 130 50 0 0 0
2 m sample, channel sample,
moderate grayish drussy Qtz +
<Hematite (after sulfide) &
B14423 537206 3365609 whitish Qtz stockwork 0.272 13 19 210 440 120 74 0

NE30/85, & Qtz + <Galena
stockwork. Host rock in
Limestone‐Shale
Las Abejas STR projection, 80
cm sample, grab sample,
including 20 cm of whitish &
<transparent Qtz cement
~60%, & moderate
transparent‐whitish drussy Qtz
+ <Hematite stockwork & Qtz +
<Py cement. Host rock: fine
grain sandstone. STR
B14424 537115 3365598 NW15/60. 1.195 11 70 750 440 110 6 0
1m channel smple, STR
SE20/75, including 20 cm of
breccia STR (Qtz 30%) with
Qtz & Qtz + <Black mineral, &
weak late stage of Hematite &
MnOx as drussy open space
infill. Rest of sample with
moderate drussy Qtz
B14425 537295 3365659 stockwork & 0.032 3 18 300 240 20 8 0
1 m channel sample,
moderate to weak 1‐3 mm
grayish‐whitish drussy Qtz +
<black mineral stockwork
(SE10/85), moderate Hematite
& MnOx c/fractures, moderate
weathering. Host rock fine
grain sandstone‐shale
sequence and in fault contact
B14426 537310 3365671 (NW30/60) with Li 0.083 6 46 490 690 60 11 0
4 m channel sample, ~3 m
thickness, NW50/70? STR, two
breccia STR of 80 cm & 1.2 m
with Qtz (10‐15%) + <oxidized
sulfide + <<Py traces, & 1 m
with moderate‐weak whitish‐
grayish‐transparent drussy Qtz
stockwork, moderate Hematite
B14427 537319 3365673 (late stage?) in fractur 0.111 5 42 160 480 30 14 0
STR SE40/75, 40 cm sample,
breccia STR with 10‐15% of
gray‐<transparent and whitish
drussy Qtz + Hematite & rock
with moderate Hematite in
groundmass & weak Limomite
patches, PyOx 1%, and weak
phyllic overprinting to weak
B14428 537383 3365685 propylitic. 0.020 1 123 500 1310 50 0 0
breccia STR with ~15% of gray
Qtz + PyOx (up to 70% of PyOx
and 5 mm crystals) & gray‐
transparent Qtz + <Hematite‐
B14429 537409 3365757 Limonite (after Py) as cement 0.139 4 133 940 440 50 30 0

or stockwork, Py disseminate
1‐3%. Str located in contact of
spherulite sill (?)
STR or moderate transparent‐
grayish drussy Qtz + <Hematite
(after sulfide) stockwork, and
weak to moderate silicified
patches in spherulite‐flow
banding dike. STR SE40/80,
some places breccia with Qtz
B14430 537370 3365854 40%. 0.012 1 9 60 30 0 0 0
40 cm breccia STR (NW40/70)
with 10‐15% of transparent‐
grayish drussy Qtz + <oxidized
sulfide as cement, hosted in
microconglomerate with weak
B14431 537415 3365975 argillic overprinting to phyllic. 0.007 2 7 10 10 0 0 0
STR SE40/70, 1.2 m grab
sample, weak breccia STR with
5‐10% of transparent‐grayish &
whitish drussy Qtz +
<<Hematite (after sulfide)
cement, weak to moderate
silicified patches in
mocroconglomerate or 1‐5 mm
poorly sorted coarse lithic
B14432 537393 3365946 sandstone (lithic 0.100 63 11 70 170 30 0 0
70 cm sample, up to 50%
breccia Qtz STR (N00/60) with
first stage of whitish Qtz & late
stage of transparent‐grayish
drussy Qtz + <<Hematite &
black mineral (traces), and
weak late stage of Hematite as
drussy qtz open space infill.
B14433 537303 3365862 Host rock: pinkish‐fl 0.036 2 5 20 20 30 0 0
Sample including 20 cm of
transparent‐grayish and
whitish drussy Qtz breccia STR
(NE05/80) & 30 cm of
moderate drussy Qtz +
Hematite stockwork SE30/70.
Host rock: beige k‐feldspar +
Qtz & aphanitic groundmass
B14434 537251 3365838 rock (sill). 1.670 3 12 10 10 0 0 0
20 cm of breccia drussy Qtz +
<PyOx STR, & 20 cm with
weak‐moderate transparent to
grayish & whitish Qtz
stockwork, partly oxidized Py
traces. Host rock: Siltstone‐
shale sequence. Hanging wall
rock with weak silicificcation
B14435 537225 3365664 an 0.445 7 28 70 100 150 0 0

30 cm sample, moderate to
weak 1‐3 mm whitish &
transparent‐gray drussy Qtz +
stockwork NW‐SE60‐70/80‐90
& fine grain sandstone with
weak patchy silica, weak
B14436 537093 3365658 phyllic, PyOx 1%. 0.214 1 6 570 190 0 5 0
50 cm grab sample, including
15 cm of breccia Qtz STR with
trend N00/75 & transparent‐
grayish & whitish Qtz + <PyOx
infill or cement ~30%, & rest of
sample include moderate 1‐2
mm whitish‐transparent drussy
Qtz + <Hematite stockwork,
B14437 536996 3365629 host rock with mode 3.850 18 122 1110 950 10 0 0
40 cm sample, irregular ~20 cm
breccia STR with trend
SE30/65, transparent‐grayish &
<whitish drussy Qtz, & sporadic
banding of Hematite & MnOx,
MnOx c/fractures. Host rock:
coarse grain sandstone &
<shale‐fine grain sandstone
B14438 537119 3365910 sequece with weak phyllic 0.085 4 25 40 310 30 0 0
STR NW30/75, ~80 cm breccia
STR with ~10% of gray‐
transparent Qtz infill &
moderate MnOx, Hematite &
Limonite as patches or weak
banding; coarse grain lithic
sandstone (folded and with
weak foliation) with weak
selective phyllic & chlorite
B14439 537115 3365972 veinlets, seq 5.660 22 400 1170 2760 90 0 0
80cm sample, NW20/50
breccia Qtz vein STR with
transparent‐gray drussy Qtz +
<Py (PyOx) + <Galena +
<<Sphalerite. Sporadic patches
with unoxidized Py & Galena +
<Sphalerite. Hosted in
andesitic? Tuff with weak‐
B14440 537500 3365497 moderate propylitic. 0.275 7 118 5820 5360 30 0 0
grayish Qtz vein (NW 30/60),
with weak hematite + <<
limonite in cavities , MnOx +<<
black mineral , hosted in KfPQ
rock with moderate propylitic
B14441 535691 3364545 & moderate phyllic alteration 0.038 1 16 1000 1470 10 0 0
(NW 65/60) with moderate
hematite + << limonite, black
B14442 535623 3364602 mineral traces + MnOx traces, 0.026 1 132 1440 970 10 0 0

40 cm with KfPQ rock (with
tiny Qtz veinlents in stwk), the
sample is hosted in KfPQ rock
with moderate ph
1.50 m of sample , grayish‐
(NW40/55) with moderate hmt
+ << limonite in fractures &
cavities, PyOx dissem < 1%,
black mineral +<<MnOx ,
propylitic & weak ‐moderate
B14443 535592 3364720 phyllic alteration, weak‐mod sil 2.520 6 29 7620 1130 10 0 0
1 m of sample ,grayish‐
whithish Qtz vein + breccia
structure (NW 20/55) with
moderate hematite +
<<limonite in fractures &
cavities, black mineral +<<
MnOx, hosted in KfPQ rock
with weak propylitic & weak‐
moderate phylli, weak‐
1.5 m of sample , including
grayish‐whithish Qtz vein (NW
30/55) + structure with
stockwork (grayish veinlents),
moderate hematite + <<
mineral + MnOx in fractures,
B14445 535510 3365067 propylitic + weak‐moderate ph 0.239 6 483 4930 440 20 0 0
whithish‐grayish Qtz vein = 40
cm of wide (NW 25/75) with
fractures & cavities, MnOx + <<
black mineral, hosted in KfPQ
rock with weak phyllic & weak
whithish‐grayish Qtz vein = 20
cm of wide, (NE25/75) with
weak hematite in cavities +
MnOx in fractures hosted in
KfPQ rock with weak‐moderate
propylitic & weak‐moderate
phyllic, weak silicification, PyOx
B14447 535575 3364434 >1 % dissem 0.019 1 42 540 390 0 0 0
1 of sample, whithish & grayish
+ << amethyst Qtz vein (SE 30
/55) with moderate hematite +
<< limonite in traces + black
mineral, << MnOx in fractures,
hosted in KfPQ rock with weak‐
moderate phyllic & mod
B14448 535540 3364259 propylitic 2.470 52 104 6500 1240 70 44 0
B14449 535523 3364469 40 cm of sample, whithish‐ bull 0.259 2 56 100 90 110 0 0

Qtz vein (NE‐SW 20/?) with
moderate hematite + weak
mineral in traces + MnOx in
fractures, hosted in KfPQ with
weak phyllic & weak propylitic
weak breccia STR with 5‐10%
of gray drussy Qtz + <Hematite
+ Limonite (after Py & other
sulfides), weak phyllic in STR.
Host rock arkosic sandstone
B14451 537506 3365560 with weak propylitic. 0.124 2 297 320 370 50 16 0
STR NW20/80, weak breccia
STR or moderate grayish Qtz +
<PyOx (1‐3 mm crystals) as
stockwork or infill, weak phyllic
overprinting to propylitic in
B14452 537545 3365549 structure. Host rock as above. 0.251 1 389 1850 1280 70 0 0
STR SE80/80, ~40 cm wide,
grab sample in structure, weak
brecia structure with 5% of
<Hematite (after sulfide) &
moderate‐weak silcified fine
grain beige sandstone bedding
(<2 meters) & weak phyllic.
B14453 537638 3365623 Weak Limonite c/fracture 0.013 0 37 30 70 0 0 0
Moderate stockwork & weak
breccia STR with transparent‐
grayish & whitish drussy Qtz
stockwork NE10‐20/85 &
SE50/80, & moderate
silcifiedfine grain sandstone
(<5 m bed) & weak phyllic,
PyOx <1%, weak Limonite
c/fractures, STR enclosed by
B14454 537663 3365551 propylitic rock. 0.482 7 677 370 240 10 31 0
moderate‐weak whitish‐
transparent Qtz stockwork &
one 5 cm Qtz + <Black mineral
+ <PyOx (traces) veining,
hosted in fine grain sandstone‐
B14455 537694 3365624 volcanosediments 0.189 5 122 630 360 20 25 0
grayish Qtz vein(N‐S/ high
angle), with moderate‐strong
hematite +<<limonite, black
mineral + MnOx in fractures &
cavities, hosted in KfPQ rock
B14456 535722 3364343 with weak phyllic alteration 0.202 2 127 690 380 1170 30 0
(NE 25/ high angle), 25 cm
B14457 535805 3364433 KfPQ with tiny Qtz veinlents + 0.278 1 59 1230 1130 10 0 0

moderate hematite in cavities,
fractures, hosted in KfPQ with
weak phyllic
1.20 m of sample, whithish &
bull Qtz vein (SE 25 /70) with
weak hematite in cavities +
sericite tr, hosted in GPB rock
with moderate propylitic &
B14458 535397 3364202 moderate phyllic 1.240 0 66 180 50 30 0 0
1 m of sample, whithish & bull
Qtz vein with weak hematite in
cavities + <<limonite (NW
55/70) hosted in GPB rock with
moderate‐strong propylitic &
B14459 535464 3364120 weak phyllic 0.062 0 82 340 180 10 10 0
60 cm of sample , whithish +
bull Qtz vein (NW 45 / 60) with
cavities + <<limonite, black
mineral + MnOx in fractures,
hosted in GPB rock with
moderate‐strong propylitic
Note: fresh py dissem >1% in
B14460 535340 3363965 bull Qtz vein 1.145 2 58 110 60 360 0 0
Grab sample, ~70 cm sample,
moderate & weak breccia STR
(NW20/?) with 1‐3 mm gray &
<whitish drussy Qtz + <PyOx
(Hem‐Lim) stockwork or infill,
moderate‐weak Hematite &
MnOx as drussy open space
infill. Weak silicified arkosic
B14461 537542 3365634 sandstone in structure, an 0.054 1 36 70 120 10 0 0
STR (SW05/60) & moderate
PyOx (up to 5 mm crystals),
moderate‐weak silicified
groundmass in structure, PyOx
disseminate 1%, weak phyllic,
weak late stage of Hematite &
B14462 537575 3365670 <MnOx as drussy open space in 0.081 2 200 590 530 20 0 0
weak breccia STR with
moderate‐weak whtish Qtz +
PyOx (Limonite) + Hematite
(after sulfide) & <grayish Qtz +
<Black mineral stockwork,
weak Limonite c/fractures,
weak MnOx c/fractures.
Hosted in fault contact (due to
B14463 537623 3365697 STR) betw 0.412 9 39 240 270 20 0 0
60 cm sample, main STR
NW20/75 & 20 cm of
B14464 537583 3365760 stockwork (SW05/70), weak 0.036 1 70 540 620 0 0 0

breccia STR and moderate
<PyOx stockwork, weak
silicification & phyllic
overprinting to propylitic.
25 cm of moderate 1‐30 mm
transparent‐whitish‐grayish
Qtz + <PyOx stockwork,
moderate‐weak silicified and
phyllic arkosic sandstone,
wall rock with weak phyllic &
Qtz veinlet traces overprinting
B14465 537598 3365803 to propylitic. 0.597 4 51 100 180 10 0 0
70 cm sample, breccia Qtz vein
STR (NW40/60) with Qtz 30‐
50% and weak banded grayish
Qtz + <Hematite (after
sulfide)?Black mineral + MnOx
+ <Qtz?transparent‐whitish Qtz
and late stage of amethyst Qtz.
Hosted in moderate weathered
B14466 537617 3365919 arkosic sandstone‐volca 0.367 47 107 1910 3860 10 6 0
Grab sample of 50 cm breccia
STR (SE50/55) with 10‐15% of
transparent‐gray‐grayish
drussy Qtz + < Hematite +
<<Limonite (after sulfide)
cement or stockwork, hosted
in beige spherulite sill with
B14467 537292 3366138 <0.5 mm qtz crystals ~10%. 0.350 8 17 160 100 20 0 0
sulfide) cement, mostly gray‐
transparent Qtz, weak‐
moderate patchy silica in STR.
Host rock: beige‐pinkish
spherulite sills with qtz
phenocrystals ~10%, and weak
B14468 537289 3366203 silicif 0.860 78 23 280 90 20 7 0
STR SE20/70, ~60 cm sample,
whitish‐transparent‐<grayish
drussy Qtz breccia vein (Qtz
~90%), sporadic moderate
Hematite + <clay replacing
fragments of breccia. Wall rock
with weak phyllic overprinting
to weak propylitic. Host rock
B14469 537201 3366151 0.5‐1 mm grain size li 0.033 1 9 10 10 10 0 0
STR SE70(?)/65, 50cm sample,
weak breccia STR with ~5% of
<<Hematite (after sulfide) as
infill or cement. Host rock
coarse grain lithic sandstone &
<shale‐fine grain sandstone
B14470 537203 3366140 sequence with weak phyllic, 0.034 2 16 40 50 40 17 0

weak Hematite c/fra
Grab sample, weak‐moderate
drussy Qtz + Hematite
stockwork SE20/60 &
SW50/80, hosted in weak
B14471 537250 3366100 silicified spherulite sills. 0.024 0 9 20 20 50 0 0
STR SE60/50, ~30 cm weak
gray‐transparent Qtz +
<Hematite (after sulfide) as
cement or stockwork. Hosted
in fault contact of flow banding
(rhyolitic?) and coarse grain
sandstone with weak phyllic &
Moderate‐weak transparent to
grayish drussy Qtz + <Hematite
(after sulfide) stockwork
NW80/85 & SE10/70, hosted in
weak‐moderate silicified fine
grain sandstone‐shale
sequence with weak phyllic &
weak‐moderate Hematite
B14473 537303 3366002 c/fractures. 0.041 4 35 100 190 30 0 0
~2 m sample, ~50 cm main
structure (NW10/75) with
~50% of gray drussy Qtz +
<Hematite (after sulfide), and
also 50 cm of breccia STR with
30% of gray‐transparent Qtz +
Hematite + MnOx + <Black
mineral with irregular trend
B14474 536876 3365737 (~SE‐NW30), rest of sample incl 0.435 5 119 1300 1810 30 5 0
50 cm sample, gray‐
transparent banded drussy Qtz
vein (NW20/80) with banding
of gray Qtz &Qtz + <Hematite
(after sulfide) & <whitish
drussy Qtz . Host rock as
B14475 536901 3365733 above. 0.780 24 68 1500 1820 40 47 0
STR NW25/75, 2 meter sample
of gray‐transparent banded
drussy Qtz vein and veining
with banding of transparent
Qtz ?gray‐transparent Qtz +
<Galena + <Oxidized
sulfide?Oxidized sulfide +
<Qtz?Gray Qtz & late stage of
B14476 536921 3365725 amethyst Qtz. 1.040 11 342 14800 24100 50 69 0
NE‐SE15‐25/85 & SE60/70 Qtz
veining and weak breccia STR,
80 cm sample, grayish‐
transparent & whitish drussy
Qtz + <oxidized sulfide
B14477 536945 3365781 (Hematite & Limonite) veining 2.990 9 209 4630 1450 10 6 0

(15 cm wide) or breccia STR
infill, sample mosltly in Qtz &
20 cm in PQP? With moderate
w

Cerro Caliche Technical Report M Gray For Corex Gold 2007july31.10591820

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Cerro Caliche Technical Report M Gray For Corex Gold 2007july31.10591820

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV

Summary Report on the Caliche Gold Project, Municipio of Cucurpe, Sonora

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 i

14.4 Sample Interval Parameters ............................................................... 37

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 ii

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 iii

1) Stockwork and/or disseminated zones of gold-silver mineralization, mineable

Examples of target type 1 include the Las Abejas-Veta de Oro, La Muñeca-La

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 1 of 116

or as zones of stockwork or disseminated mineralization localized by structures or

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 2 of 116

4 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE

Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV (RGM) and Matthew D. Gray, the

4.2 Terms of Reference

4.3 Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to provide an independent assessment of the Caliche

4.4 Sources of Information

- Geologic, geophysical, and assay data collected and published by the

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 3 of 116

- Topographic and physiographic data collected and published by the Instituto

- Geologic and geochemical data contained in private maps and reports

4.5 Field Examination and Data Review by the Qualified Person.

4.6 Definitions and Translations

CRM - Consejo de Recursos Minerales (Natural Resources

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 4 of 116

SEMARNAT - Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

5 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

This Technical Report and all publications, exhibits, documentation, conclusions,

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 5 of 116

6 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

6.1 Area and Location

The Caliche project comprises 15 mining concessions covering a total of 1,560.48

6.2 Claims and Title

The Caliche project consists of 15 mining concessions covering in aggregate

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 6 of 116

Figure 6.1. Caliche Project Location Map.

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 7 of 116

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 8 of 116

Table 6.1 Listing of Mining Concessions

Number Concession Title Number Concession Holder Area (Has.)

1 El Huevo de Oro 212857 Juan Pedro Fernández Duarte 10.0000

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 9 of 116

Figure 6.2. Concession Map.

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 10 of 116

6.3 Surface Rights

6.5 Environmental Liability

No significant environmental liabilities are apparent. Small abandoned mines and

Mine construction and operation activities generally require preparation of a

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 11 of 116

also require Autorizacion en Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change

7 ACCESS, CLIMATE, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 12 of 116

In the 1990’s Cambior Exploration assembled a mining concession package of 4,200

In 2006 Corex Global SA de CV, a subsidiary of Corex Gold Corporation, initiated

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 13 of 116

9.1 Regional Geology

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 14 of 116

Figure 9.1. Geologic Map, Regional.

Matthew D. Gray C.P.G. #10688 31 July 2007 Page 15 of 116

9.2 Local Geology

• Medium to course grained granodiorite with ~20% quartz grains intergrown

• Medium grained quartz-alkali feldspar equigranular granodiorite with <10%

• Medium to coarse grained weakly porphyritic granodiorite, with very course