Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
All rights reserved. The Green Mark Criteria may be used by individuals for reference purposes only. Any user of the Green
Mark Criteria shall retain all copyright and other proprietary notices contained in it. Any sale, modification, reproduction,
display or distribution of the Green Mark Criteria or any copies thereof is not allowed without BCA’s prior written consent,
which may be obtained by writing to the following address or via email to bca_enquiry@bca.gov.sg.
BCA Green Mark comprises a number of distinct rating tools that, together, holistically rate the built environment
for its environmental performance. These include:
A streamlined criteria that addresses sustainability in a more balanced and holistic manner
Greater Emphasis – climatically contextual design, energy effectiveness, greater focus on health and
wellbeing of building occupants, smart buildings, and a systematic approach to addressing embodied
energy and resource use.
Recognises the design process and encourages due processes to respond to site context which facilitates
sustainability to be considered at the early project stages where there is the greatest opportunity for low
cost, high reward options to be implemented.
Green Mark itself becomes a design guide and accessible to professionals, students and the population
at large
A collaborative framework – with extensive external industry members involved in its setting of metrics,
assessment methods and performance levels.
The Green Mark RB: 2016 Criteria should be read in conjunction with Green Mark RB: 2016 Technical Guide
and Requirements.
Climate
Buildings should demonstrate emissions reduction and resilience to the effects of climate change.
Resources
As stewards of the earth’s resources, buildings should use resources in an efficient manner
to reduce its environmental footprint over the building life cycle.
Wellbeing
Liveable built environments are vital for our health and well-being.
Ecology
Buildings should consider their wider impact on the biosphere through the integration of nature
and protection of natural systems including flora and fauna.
3
Assessment Process
The BCA Green Mark Certification Process is as follows:
Application
Submittal of application with relevant supporting documents for certification upon finalisation of
building design.
Upon acceptance of application and fee payable, a BCA Green Mark Assessor will be assigned for the
duration of the project.
Pre-Assessment (Optional)
Conducted to aid the project team in understanding the criteria and evaluation of the certification level
sought.
Optional step if the project team is familiar with the criteria (except for incentive projects).
Assessment
Verification
The Green Mark Score of the building design is the total of all the numerical scores (i.e. Green Mark
points) assigned based on the degree of compliance with the applicable criteria. The following table
states the corresponding Green Mark Score to attain the respective Green Mark rating namely BCA
Green Mark Gold, GoldPLUS and Platinum. Buildings must also fulfil their respective pre-requisite
requirements to attain the respective Green Mark rating. The total points scored include the bonus
points scored under Advanced Green Efforts.
4
Criteria Overview
To dovetail the criteria with the sustainable outcomes of Green Mark RB: 2016, the criteria has been
re-structured into 5 sections, with 16 criteria and 48 sustainability indicators. The total points is 140
points, inclusive of 20 points from Section 5: Advanced Green Efforts
Within the main criteria, criteria within the grey boxes with the 'Advanced Green Efforts' icon are
scored under 5.01 Enhanced Performance.
5
CONTENTS
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1
Prerequisite Requirements
Climatic Responsive Design
P.1 To enhance biodiversity through the integration of lush greenery provision, preservation of existing trees and
sustainable landscape management. In addition, to reduce storm surges and improve quality of water entering the
public drains through introduction of waterscape within the development. Projects are given two options to comply
with:
Option 2: Minimum points scored under Part 1.02b Integrated Landscape and Waterscape
GoldPLUS: 2.0 points
Platinum: 2.5 points
P.2 The residential envelope thermal transmittance value (RETV) of the building, as determined in accordance with
the formula set out in the “Code on Envelope Thermal Performance for Buildings” issued by the Commissioner of
Building Control, shall not exceed the following:
The RETV of west, south-west and north-west facades of all buildings within development should not exceed
maximum RETV of 25W/m2.
The average thermal transmittance (U-value) for the gross area of the building’s roof shall not exceed the
following limits:
Roof Weight Weight Range (kg/m2) Maximum U-value (W/m2K)
Group
Light < 50 0.8
Medium 50 to 230 1.1
Heavy > 230 1.5
8
P.3 To be eligible for Green Mark Platinum rating, it is a requirement to use ventilation simulation modelling and
analysis or wind tunnel testing to identify the most effective building design and layout. The simulation results and
the recommendations derived are to be implemented to ensure good natural ventilation. Projects are given the
following pathway to comply with the requirement:
No Yes
Other than dwelling units, common areas like staircases and lobbies (excluding those that are located in
basement areas) should also be designed to be naturally ventilated (i.e. to provide openable windows or other
openings with aggregate area of not less than 5% of the space required to be ventilated).
P.4 For windows and curtain wall systems, air leakage rates shall not exceed the limit specified in SS212 and SS381
respectively
P.5 To adopt energy efficient vertical transportation systems to reduce their energy consumption.
All lifts shall be equipped with Variable Voltage Variable Frequency (VVVF) drives and sleep mode features except
for building typologies where such technology is not available.
P.6 Prescribed system efficiency of air-conditioning system for all dwelling units to be as follows:
Air-conditioners with at least the following ticks under the Singapore Energy Labelling Scheme or equivalent COP
(Coefficient of Performance).
P.7 At least 10% improvement in lighting power budget over baseline (excluding external lighting).
P.8 To evaluate building footprint’s potential in harnessing solar energy, so as to raise awareness of viable solar
opportunities within the development and encourage building developers to adopt photovoltaics.
Resource Stewardship
P.9 To provide water efficient fittings for common facilities that meet minimum requirements as detailed in the
following table
1A building’s footprint refers to the area on a project site used by the building structure, defined by the perimeter of the
building plan. Open car park spaces, landscape, underground construction and non-building facilities (such as covered
walkways) are not included in the building footprint.
10
P.13 To limit the use of high VOC emitting building and furnishing materials to improve indoor air quality for the
health and well-being of occupants.
The internal paints shall be certified by an approved local certification body and test methods shall comply with
ISO 17895 or ISO 11890. All coats of paint shall be considered, including primers, sealers, base coats and top
coats.
11
Green Companies:
≥ 4.5 3.0
(Up to 3 points)
1.03 Tropicality
1.03a Tropical Façade Performance Cap at 5 points
Enhance the overall thermal performance of building envelope 1 points for every reduction of 1 W/m2 in RETV
to minimise heat gain thus reducing the overall cooling load from the baseline
when required.
Points awarded = 25- (RETV)
2
Baseline : Maximum Permissible RETV = 25 W/m
where RETV 25 W/m2
1.03b Internal Organisation Cap at 2 points
Design for natural ventilation in following common areas:
Extent of Coverage: 80% of applicable areas
(a) Lift lobbies and corridors 1 point
(b) Staircases 1 point
Step 1
Use of ventilation simulation modelling and analysis to identify 3 points if the development has good natural
the most effective building design and layout to achieve good ventilation – i.e. a minimum 70% of the selected
natural ventilation provided the following primary evaluation units with minimum weighted average wind
parameters can be achieved: velocity of 0.60 m/s
OR
Step 2
Use of ventilation simulation modelling and analysis or wind
tunnel testing to identify the most effective building design and
layout to achieve good natural ventilation. Points scored = (% of selected typical units with
good natural ventilation)/7
Note:
Development scoring for 1.03c (i) Step 2- Ventilation Simulation (up to 10 points)
Modelling is not eligible to score under 1.03c (ii)
OR
Step 3
Thermal comfort modelling shall be performed based on the
following PMV equation and comply with the stated PMV range
1 point if the development complies with the
PMV= -11.7853+0.4232T-0.57889V
thermal comfort criteria
PMV Range PPD
-0.5<PMV<+0.5* <10*
(ii) Effective building layout design and unit design reduce the
need for using air-conditioning.
Design for air flow within dwelling units
0.5 point for every 10% of units with window
Building layout design: Proper design of building
layout that utilizes prevailing wind conditions to openings facing north AND south directions
achieve adequate cross ventilation.
Dwelling unit design: Good ventilation in indoor units 0.5 point for every 10% of living rooms and
through sufficient openings. bedrooms designed with true cross ventilation
(vi) Others
Automated irrigation system with sensor 0.5 point for every 25% of landscape area served
control 0.5 point for every 20% of landscape area
Drought tolerant plant (Up to 2 points)
3.01b Water Usage Monitoring Cap at 1 point
Facilitate setting of water consumption reduction targets
and continual monitoring through the provision of water
meters for major water uses.
CUI:
Points shall be scored for CUI are based on the following
table:
Table 3.02a-1 CUI scoring Matrix:
≤ 0.45 1.5
≤ 0.40 2
≤ 0.35 2.5
Declaration of Concrete, 1
Glass and Steel
Declaration of additional 0.25 points per
materials material (cap at 1
point)
22
Doors 1 0.5
>80% >80%
External Wall 1 2
Building services - Mechanical, electrical and 0.25 point for each product used
plumbing equipment or products such as
for ≥ 90% of the applicable use
chillers, circuit boards, transformers, water
pipes
(Up to 2 points)
3.03 Waste
Adhesives & sealants (including tile grouting) 1 point for one main category of finishes (excluding tiles)
for ≥ 90% of applicable areas
Floor coverings such as carpets, laminates
and vinyl flooring (excluding tiles) 3 points for all finishes for ≥ 90% of applicable areas
Ceiling coverings such as ceiling boards,
Wall coverings (excluding tiles) (Up to 3 points)
(Up to 2 points)
25
( Up to 3 points)
To reduce storm surges and improve quality of water 1 point for projects certified under PUB ABC Waters
entering the public drains through infiltration or design ‘Gold Class’ certification
features.
Provision of vertical greenery system on 2 points for more than 50% of building facades
building facades abutting the living rooms,
dining areas and bedrooms of dwelling units 1 point for at least 25% of building facades
31
5D(Cost) BIM
6D(Facilities Management) BIM
( Up to 3 points)
( up to 2 points)
(Up to 2 points)
To encourage the use of other green features that are Extent of coverage: 80% of the applicable equipment type
innovative and have positive environmental impact. or product
References
P.02 Residential Envelope and Roof Thermal Transfer [19] European Commission (2015) ‘Environmental Impact Assessment
[1] BCA Singapore ‘Code on Envelope Thermal Performance for Guidance’; Retrieved:
Buildings’; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-support.htm
http://www.bca.gov.sg/PerformanceBased/others/RETV.pdf [20] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ‘National
P.03 Ventilation Performance Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)’ Retrieved;
[2] BCA Singapore; ‘BCA Green Mark Computational Fluid http://www.epw.senate.gov/nepa69.pdf
Dynamic Simulation Guidelines’ [21] ASTM E1980 -11 ‘Standard Practice for
P.04 Air Tightness and Leakage Calculating Solar Reflectance Index of Horizontal and
[3] Singapore Standard 212 – ‘Specification for Aluminium Alloy Low Sloped Opaque Surfaces’; ASTM International
Windows’; SPRING Singapore 1.02b Integrated Landscape and Waterscape
[4] Singapore Standard 381 – Materials and Performance Tests for [22] National Parks Board ‘1001 Garden Plants in Singapore
Aluminium Curtain Walls 2nd edition’; NParks Publication
1.01a Climatic & Contextually Responsive Brief [23] National Parks Board ‘Trees of our Garden
[5] The Singapore Institute of Architects ‘Attributes City, 2nd edition’; NParks Publication
of a Sustainable Built Environment’; SIA Publishing [24] National Parks Board, ‘NParks Flora and
[6] Sinclair, D. ‘Guide to Using the RIBA Plan of Work Fauna Web’; Retrieved
2013’; RIBA Publishing https://florafaunaweb.nparks.gov.sg/
1.01b Integrative Design Process [25] National Parks Board ‘Landscape Excellence Assesment
[7] ASHRAE Standard 189.1 ‘Standard for the Design Framework (LEAF)’; Retrieved:
of High-Performance Green Buildings – Informative https://www.nparks.gov.sg/partner-us/landscape-
Appendix H – Integrated Design’; American Society of industry/leaf
[26] Public Utilities Board‘Active Beautiful Clean Waters
Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Refrigerating Design Guidelines, 3rd Edition’; Retrieved:
and Air-Conditioning Engineers http://www.pub.gov.sg/abcwaters/
[8] Sinclair, D. ‘Assembling a Collaborative Project abcwatersdesignguidelines/Documents/ABC_DG_2014.pdf
Team, Practical Tools including Multidisciplinary Schedules 1.03a Tropical Façade Performance
of Services’; RIBA Publishing [27] BCA Singapore ‘Code on Envelope Thermal
[9] Integrative Process (IP) - ANSI Consensus National Performance for Buildings’; Retrieved:
Standard Guide ‘Design and Construction of Sustainable Buildings and http://www.bca.gov.sg/PerformanceBased/others/RETV.pdf
Communities’; American National Standards Institute P.06 Air Conditioning System Efficiency
1.01c Environmental Credentials of Project Team [28] NEA Singapore Energy Labelling Scheme
[10] BCA Singapore ‘Certified GMFM /GMFP / GMM / GMP; Retrieved: 2.01b Lighting System Efficiency
http://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/gm_manager.html [29] Singapore Standard 530 ‘Code of Practice for Energy
[11] BCA Singapore ‘Green and Gracious Builder Award’; Retrieved: Efficiency Standard for Building Services and Equipment’;
http://www.bca.gov.sg/Awards/GGBA/builders_award.html SPRING Singapore
[12] ISO 14001 ‘Environmental management’; International [30] Singapore Standard 531 ‘Code of Practice for lighting
Organisation for Standardisation of work places - Indoor’; SPRING Singapore
[13] Singapore Green Building Council ‘Green Services Certification 2.01c Car Park Energy
Scheme’; Retrieved: [31] Singapore Standard 530 ‘Code of Practice for Energy
http://www.sgbc.sg/green-certifications/services-certification/ Efficiency Standard for Building Services and Equipment’;
1.01d Building Information Modelling (BIM) SPRING Singapore
[14] BCA Singapore ‘Singapore BIM Guide – Version 2’; Retrieved: 2.02a Energy Efficient Practices, Design and Features
https://www.corenet.gov.sg/media/586132/Singapore-BIM- [32] NEA Singapore Energy Labelling Scheme
Guide_V2.pdf
[15] Sinclair, D. ‘BIM Overlay to the RIBA Outline Plan of Work’; RIBA P.08 Water Fittings for Common Facilites
Publishing [33] Singapore Standard CP 48 – Code of Practice For
1.01e User Engagement water services
[16] BCA Singapore ‘BCA Green Lease Toolkit: Office Green Schedule’; P.11 Sustainable Products
Retrieved: [34] Singapore Green Building Product (SGBP) Certification
http://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/others/Office_Green_Schedule.docx Scheme http://www.sgbc.sg/green-certifications/product-
[17] BCA Singapore ‘BCA Green Lease Toolkit: Retail Green Schedule’; certification
Retrieved: [35] Singapore Green Label Scheme (SGLS) http://www.sgls.
http://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/others/Retail_Green_Schedule.docx sec.org.sg/sgls-standard.php
1.02a Sustainable Urbanism 3.01a Water Efficiency Measures
[18] Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland (2002) [36] Singapore Standard CP 48 ‘Code of Practice for water
‘Guidelines on the information to be contained in Environmental Impact services’; SPRING Singapore
Statements (EIS)’; Retrieved: [37] Public Utilities Board, Singapore on Water Efficiency
http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/ea/guidelines/#.VRks5-H1Jww Labelling Scheme’; https://www.pub.gov.sg/wels
36
Acknowledgements
The launch of Green Mark for Residential Buildings: GM RB 2016 is a result of our extensive industry collaboration across the
construction value chain. We would like to extend our sincerest gratitude to all internal and external stakeholders for their
invaluable support and contribution towards the development of Green Mark RB: 2016 that will enable us to develop a
sustainable environment for our current and future generations.
Ms Vivian Feng (Rankine & Hill (Singapore) Pte Ltd) Er Tan Kiat Leong
Mr Jimmy Ang (Rankine & Hill (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner (S.E.Asia) Pte Ltd)
Ms Wong Lai Ching (Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner (S.E.Asia)) Dr Xu Jingfeng (ARUP Singapore Pte Ltd)
Mr Yanto Halim (Daikin Airconditioning (Singapore) Pte Ltd)
Mr Swen Tan (Daikin Airconditioning (Singapore) Pte Ltd) Solar PV Taskforce
Mr Ke Yam Cheong (Mitsubishi Electric Asia Pte Ltd) Er Lee Chuan Seng, Co-Chair (Beca Asia Holdings Pte Ltd)
Mr Fenny Lim (Mitsubishi Electric Asia Pte Ltd) Mr Allen Ang (Keppel Land Limited)
Mr Desmond Chan (Singapore Economic Development Board)
Architectural Taskforce Mr Lester Chia Ming Hang (Housing & Development Board)
Mr Cheong Yew Kee, Chair (2B Architects) Dr Er Johnny Wong (Housing & Development Board)
Ms Jaye Tan, Co-Chair (Studio Green Pte Ltd) Mr Johnny Lim Chin Huat (Surbana Jurong Pte Ltd)
Mr Siow Zhi Xiang, Co-Chair (CPG Consultants Pte Ltd) Ms Kavita Gandhi (Sustainable Energy Association of Singapore)
Ms Astee Lim (Jurong Consultants Pte Ltd) Mr Kong Wei Jie (Energetix Pte Ltd)
Ms Chang Yen Lin (KPK Quantity Surveyors (Singapore) Pte Ltd) Dr Liu Licheng (Saferay Pte Ltd)
Mr Kuan Chee Yung (CPG Consultants Pte Ltd) Mr Mark Netto (Sustainable Energy Association of Singapore)
Mr Sonny Chionh (RSP Architects Planners & Engineers Pte Ltd) Ms Olivia Oo (Singapore Economic Development Board)
Mr Tan Szue Hann (Surbana Jurong Pte Ltd) Dr Thomas Reindl
Dr To Kien (Singapore University of Technology and Design) (Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore/ National
University of Singapore)
Green Products & Materials Taskforce
Er Yvonne Soh, Co-Chair (Singapore Green Building Council) Sustainable Construction and Carbon taskforce
Mr Edwin Fong (SPRING Singapore) Er Lim Peng Hong, Co-Chair
Mr Eugene Yong (The Singapore Contractors Association Ltd) (Association of Consulting Engineers Singapore)
Mr Goh Su-Liang (Singapore Green Building Council) Er Chia Wah Kam (ARUP Singapore Pte Ltd)
Ms Jennifer Yap (National Environmental Agency) Dr Ho Nyok Yong (The Singapore Contractors Association Ltd)
Ms Joanna Shen (National Environmental Agency) Er Joseph Goh (Institution of Engineers Singapore)
Mr Kavickumar s/o Muruganathan Er Lauw Su Wee (LSW Consulting Engineers Singapore)
(Singapore Environment Council) Dr Song Bin (Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology)
Mr Kuan Chee Yung (CPG Consultants Pte Ltd) Dr Tan Guan (T.Y. Lin International Group)
Mr Lim Tow Fok Er Quak Cheow Swee
(Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore) (Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner (S.E.Asia) Pte Ltd)
Mr Ng Wee Kok (Singapore Manufacturer Federation) Er Yvonne Soh (Singapore Green Building Council)
Mr Pang Tong Teck (Singapore Civil Defence Force)
Dr Song Bin (Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology) Academic Collaborations
Prof Bert Blocken (Eindhoven University of Technology)
Lighting Taskforce Asst Prof J. Alstan Jakubiec
Er Yvonne Soh, Co-Chair (Singapore Green Building Council) (Singapore University of Technology and Design)
Mr Eddy Lau, Co-Chair (Singapore Green Building Council)
Mr Adrian Ting (CapitaLand Limited) Others
Dr Chien Szu-Cheng BCA would also like to thank the following organisations who
(Berkeley Education Alliance for Research in Singapore) have made invaluable contributions during the criteria
Mr Dan Foreman (ARUP Singapore Pte Ltd) conceptualisation and piloting phase:
Mr Gaurav Jain (Lighting Planners Associates (S) Pte Ltd)
Ms Irene Yong (Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner (S.E.Asia) Pte Ltd) ADDP Architects LLP
Mr Kevin Sturrock (iLab Pte Ltd) ARUP Singapore Pte Ltd
Ms Ong Swee Hong (ONG&ONG Pte Ltd) Building System and Diagnostics Pte Ltd
Mr Rodney Lim (Singapore Green Building Council) Housing & Development Board
Ms Toh Yan Li (Light Collab LLP) Land Transport Authority
LendLease Pte Ltd
Noise & Acoustics Taskforce National Environment Agency
Prof Lee Siew Eang, Co-Chair (National University of Singapore) National Parks Board
Mr Alvin Cheong (Alfern Engineering Consultancy Pte Ltd) PUB, Singapore’s National Water Agency
Ms Emily Tan Hui Ching (Earth-In-Mind Pte Ltd) Singapore Green Building Council
Mr Gabriel Anthony Vincent (CPG Consultants Pte Ltd) Singapore Institute of Architects
Dr Kenny Yap (Acoustics & Environmental Solutions Pte Ltd) Surbana Jurong Pte Ltd
Er Koh Kin Teng (Squire Mech Pte Ltd)
Mr Lai Kok Heng (City Developments Ltd)