Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
As per the coda of the prior memo [stripped of explanatory lingo], it would be desirable were Dean to
endorse Fitz and, in response, for Brother Brian to aver positive/assertive Conservative positions.
• Support for The Donald's Agenda, else he wouldn't have voted for the Omnibus Bill that inter
alia reversed starvation of military-funding.
J.D. Mullane properly noted that a divided Republican Party needs MAGA hats to win, but it is vital that
the Tea Party Movement’s ENERGY be harnessed to achieve this end.
• Specifically, Fitz ONLY received 2/3 of the vote, meaning 1/3 needs to be activated.
• Specifically, Dean ONLY received 1/3 of the vote, meaning 2/3 need to be accommodated.
• Specifically, Wallace is the extreme-leftie [supporter of BDS, etc.] who must be defined/defeated.
• Specifically, the Dems [loco-regionally and nationally] must be exposed as ignoring middle-class
values in all three policy realms [economic, social, overseas].
A polarized GOP must recognize the wisdom of what Walt Kelly’s “Pogo” comic-strip recognized a half-
century ago, namely, that the “enemy” is often internal rather than external.
This evolving campaign was summarized @ “History” [subjective]; “Physical” [objective]; “Assessment”;
“Plan”; initial and subsequent follow-ups; an op-ed [composed by moi, noting that the Courier-Times
editor wished colorful-puns be removed from an earlier draft thereof]; an article about the debate and an
opinion-piece generated thereafter; two “last-gasp” syntheses [“IV“ & “V”] of pre-vote maneuvers; and
one post-election plea. Additional comments appear below the op-ed, the article, and the opinion-piece.