Rev. B Seismic Analysis Qualification Tgood Substation - Rev B W Comments

SEISMIC ANALYSIS QUALIFICATION FOR TGOOD SUBSTATION
Contents
1 General ............................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Supplemental work and options ................................................................ 1
1.2 Applied loads............................................................................................... 2
1.3 Equipment configurations ......................................................................... 2
1.4 Seismic qualification identification tag..................................................... 6
2 Equipment data .............................................................................................. 6
2.1 Overall dimensions and weights ................................................................ 6
2.2 Maximum input accelerations ................................................................... 7
2.3 Material type and strengths ....................................................................... 8
2.4 Allowable stresses ..................................................................................... 10
3 Method of analysis ....................................................................................... 11
3.1 Method of analysis .................................................................................... 11
3.2 Loads.......................................................................................................... 12
3.3 Combinations of loads .............................................................................. 13
3.4 Name of computer program .................................................................... 13
4 Analysis result .............................................................................................. 13
4.1 Numeric result .......................................................................................... 13
4.2 Check bolts ................................................................................................ 28
4.3 Check welds............................................................................................... 30
5 Simplified analysis result ............................................................................. 31
5.1 Surge arrester analysis ............................................................................. 31
5.2 HGIS analysis ........................................................................................... 32
5.3 Disconnector analysis ............................................................................... 33
5.4 Voltage transformer analysis ................................................................... 34
SEISMIC ANALYSIS QUALIFICATION FOR

TGOOD SUBSTATION
1 General
The 66KV &13.2(6.9) KV Prefabricated Switching Station

The 66KV&13.2(6.9) KV prefabricated switching station is used for 66kV
substation to open and close the 66kV and 13.2(6.9) kV feeder. It consists of two
main parts – 66kV roof top equipment and modular e-house.
The 66kV roof top equipment
The hybrid GIS breakers allowed the addition of isolation switches, multiple
current transformers and grounding switches within the same footprint of a
standard 66 kV dead-tank breaker.
The 66kV switchyard equipment was designed to be assembled on the top of the
e-house, eliminating the need for multiple cast-in-place concrete foundations.
Also, the assembled 66kV equipment on the roof makes the substation more
compact to save substation area.
The Modular E-house
The modular E-house consists of 13.2(6.9) kV switchgear, panels and other
auxiliary system.
13.2(6.9) kV switchgear adopts TGOOD welded type switchgear which can meet
customer flexible application requirements.
With the majority of the fabrication, internal assembly and wiring performed in
an efficient factory environment, the prefabricated modular E-house only needs a
little commissioning work before energized on site.
The modular compact design can be successfully applied to both medium and
high voltage solutions, as shown by 66KV &13.2(6.9) KV Prefabricated
Switching Station. Transportation, infrastructure and skilled labor challenges are
easily overcome by utilizing this concept.
1.1 Supplemental work and options
-The manufacturer, QING DAO TGOOD ELECTRIC Co, Ltd. Choose to

qualify by response spectrum and static analyses in accordance with
<<IEEE693-2005 >> for substation.
The load and combinations of load is carried out in accordance with the ASCE
standard of the ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other
Structures. The earthquake is considered. Moreover, seismic forces also accord
with load combinations from the IEEE 693-2005, Annex A.
And following types of analysis as it is stated in the analysis methods were used
to calculate the seismic stability of substation.
Response spectrum method of analysis by program ANSYS
1
- Analysis for the strength of substation

- Analysis for the strength of surge arrester assembly
- Analysis for the strength of voltage transformer assembly
- Analysis for the strength of disconnector assembly
- Analysis for the strength of HGIS assembly
1.2 Applied loads

a) Seismic load.
b) Dead load.
c) Operating load
1.3 Equipment configurations

The complete model of substation includes surge arrester, voltage transformer,
disconnector, HGIS. The Figure.1-1 shows the complete model. The length of
E-house is 9380mm, and its width is 2200mm. The height of E-house is 2815mm.
The detail dimensions of every part of the substation can refer to the drawings.
a) Side view
b) Top view
2
c) Surge arrester
Technical particulars of surge arresters

Model: Y10W-60/160
Manufacturer: Northern Arrester
System highest voltage, kV: 72.5
Rated voltage of arrester (Ur), KV: 60
Continuous operating voltage (Uc), KV: 46
Nominal discharge current (Ln), KA: 10
Line discharge class: III
Creepage distance, mm: 2450
SML Composite Hollow insulator kNm 75.93 Test report Nr: ZZZZZZZZZZ
d) Voltage transformer
3
Technical particulars of voltage transformer

Model: JDQXF-66
Manufacturer: Guangdong Sihui
Rated voltage: 72.5kV
Induction Withstand Test: 160kV 1min
BIL: 325kV, 1.2/50us
Rated voltage factor: 1.2 continuous, 1.9 8h
Max. output: 1000VA
SML Composite hollow insulator, kNm 14.75 Test report Nr: 130265J
W09-016
e) Disconnector
Technical particulars of disconnector
Model: GW4-72.5D
Manufacturer: Changgao
Rated voltage: 72.5kV
Rated current: 1250A
Rated short time withstand current and duration ( r.m.s) (kA/s): 40kA
Rated peak withstand current (peak)(kA): 100kA
Cantilever withstand, porcelain insulator, C30, kN 30 Test report Nr: W09-016
Porcelain insulator: ZSW-145/30K-4
4
f) HGIS
Technical particulars of disconnector

Model: ZHW-72.5/T2500-40kA
Manufacturer: TGOOD Electric
Rated voltage: 145kV
Rated current: 2500A
Withstand voltage: 275/315kV
Short-time Withstand Current: 40kA
Peak Withstand Current (50Hz): 100kA
Rated Operating Sequence: O-0.3s-CO-180s-CO
SML Composite Hollow Insulators, kNm 1107 ??? Test report Nr: XXXXXXXXX
5
g) E-house component
Figure.1-1 The complete model
1.4 Seismic qualification identification tag

The seismic qualification identification tag is designed as Appendix C and
attached to the equipment.
2 Equipment data
2.1 Overall dimensions and weights

Details of the design are shown on the Appendix A. Seismic outline drawing, and
Table 2-1 is the summary of weight. Moreover, the weight of E-house is listed in
Table2-2, the weight of numeric model is according to the table.
Table 2-1 Summary of Weight
No. Name of part Weight /kg

1 Surge arrester 55×3
2 Voltage transformer 220×3
3 Disconnector 230×3
4 HGIS 3000
5 E-house 15072.6
Table 2-2 Weight of E-house
NO Name of part Weight /kg

1 Base setting 300*200*12 angle steel 2053
2 12#channel steel 724
3 Sliding steel plate 513
4 Suspended column and appendages 15
5 Bed board 270
6 Frame Corner column 103
6
7 Cross beam 147

8 Middle column 327
9 bottom sill 87.9
10 100*100*5 square tube 343.5
11 lining plate of corner column 38.3
12 200*100*8 steel tube 1853
13 6.3#channel steel 83.3
14 middle support beam 54.7
15 Door shield and appendages 12
16 Head cover 150*50*8 steel tube 500
17 Channel steel 1168.2
18 5#angle steel 47.7
19 Bolts and other appendages 8
20 20#channel steel of the base 1266
21 Top plate 411.8
22 Lining plate 242.2
23 Foam materials 42
24 Door plate 1137
26 Inside unit cabinet 1825
27 Inside shield 1800
TOTAL WEIGHT 15072.6
2.2 Maximum input accelerations

In accordance with <<IEEE 693-2005 Annex D Transformers and liquid-filled
reactors>>, there are given recommendations the vertical acceleration value
relative to the horizontal one in the norms:
a v max  0.80  a h max
Where
a v max - maximum vertical acceleration
a h max - maximum horizontal acceleration
Two horizontal values of acceleration (longitudinal & traverse direction) and a

vertical value of accelerations were used as below, (g: acceleration due to
gravity :32.2 ft/s2 (9810 mm/s2)).
ah max  6.48 g
av max  0.80  6.48 g
The safety factor is greater than or equal to 2.0 leading to the conclusion that
must withstand 2  2  1.62g = 6.48g according to IEEE693-2005 if porcelain
insulators are used. The factor 1.62 is the maximum acceleration response
spectrum of NORAM in "high level". This is a safety factor, and the value would
be 1.2  1.5  2  1.32g = 4.75g when applying the ETG-1020. Those values are
very high and very difficult to comply with porcelain insulators. So synthetic
polymeric insulators are used and are possible to meet those accelerations.
7
2.3 Material type and strengths
Table 2-3 shows material properties and chemical composition. And Table 2-4
shows the allowable strengths.
We suggest the closest code of materials in ASTM (American Society for Testing
and Materials) / AWS (American Welding Society) / AISI (American Iron and
Steel Institute) with GB (Chinese National Standard) code. Concerning about the
strength of materials, we use the properties of GB, and concerning about the
method to get allowable stresses, we take the values in AISC (American Institute
of Steel Construction). Please refer to below Table 2-4.
8
Table2-3 Material properties and chemical compositions
Yield
Chemical composition (%) Tensile
Material Strength
Strength
Type Fy
Fu
(Standard) C Si Mn P S Ni Cr Cu Mg Other Ksi
2
Ksi (N/mm2)
(N/mm )
Q235 33.85 59.05
0.14~0.22 ≤0.3 0.30~0.65 ≤0.045 ≤0.050 - - - - -
(GB) (235) (410)
51.48 76.14
Q345 (GB) ≤0.2 ≤0.55 1.0~1.6 ≤0.035 ≤0.035 - - - - -
(355) (525)
E7XT-1 Vanadium AI:1.8 60.0 72.0

Determined 0.9 1.75 0.04 0.03 0.5 0.2 -
(AWS) 0.08 Mo:0.3 (422) (507)
J507 49.7 79.2

- - - - - - - - -
(GB) (345) (550)
A276-
18~ 25.0 70.0
304L ≤0.03 ≤1.0 ≤2.0 ≤0.045 ≤0.03 8~12 - - Nitrogen≤0.1
20 (180) (490)
(ASTM)
A4-80 87.0 116
≤0.2 - - ≤0.03 ≤0.03 - - - - -
(GB) (600) (800)
ZL101A - 6.5~7.5 ≤0.1 - - - - - 0.25~0.45 Ti:0.08-0.20 24.1(165.8) 28.3(195)
Epoxy glass fiber - - - - - - - - - Fiber: 70~75 34.5(238) 40.6(280)
Fe:0.35 33.85
6005-T5 - 0.6~0.9 0.1 - - - 0.1 0.1 0.4~0.6 40.6 (280)
Zn:0.1 (235)
9
2.4 Allowable stresses
Table 2-4 Allowable Stresses of Materials
Allowable stresses ksi (N/mm2)

Material Compre- Bending
Location Tension Shear Combined Stresses
Type ssion Stress
stress(Fnt) stress(Fnv) Requirements
stress(Fc) (Fb)
Steel 0.6Fy* 0.6Fy* 0.66Fy* 0.4Fy* f c fbx fby

Q235   1
plate Fc Fbx Fby
20.4(141) 20.4(141) 22.5(155) 13.6(94)
Steel 0.6Fy* 0.6Fy* 0.66Fy* 0.4Fy* f c fbx fby

Q345   1
plate Fc Fbx Fby
30.9(213) 30.9(213) 34.0(234) 20.6(142)
Weld 0.3Fexx
J507 / / /  res   allowable
line
21(145)
0.375 Fu 0.2 Fu ft 2 f
A304L Bolt / / ( )  ( v )2  1
Ft Fv
26.3(183.75) 14.0(98)
0.375 Fu 0.2 Fu ft 2 f
A4-80 Bolt / / ( )  ( v )2  1
Ft Fv
43.5(300) 17.4(120)
0.375Fu 0.2 Fu ft 2 f
A307 Bolt / / ( )  ( v )2  1
Ft Fv
22.5(154.5) 7.2(49.7)
Disconnect- 0.375 Fu 0.2 Fu f c fbx fby

ZL101A / /   1
or Fc Fbx Fby
10.6(73.1) 5.66(39)
Epoxy
Surge 0.375 Fu 0.2 Fu f c fbx fby
glass / /   1
arrester Fc Fbx Fby
fiber 15.2(105) 4.35(30)
0.6Fy* 0.6Fy* 0.66Fy* 0.4Fy* f c fbx fby

6005-T5 Blade   1
Fc Fbx Fby
20.4(141) 20.4(141) 22.5(155) 13.6(94)
*The performance of epoxy glass fiber is based on the test report (Chinese edition).
*The insulators of disconnector are made of high-strength porcelain with elasticity modulus of
0.93 1011 N/m2 and Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Its failure stress is 60MPa and its allowable stress is
30MPa.
Where:
10
: nominal tensile stress modified to include the effects of shearing stress,

Fnt'
: nominal tensile stress,
Fnt
: nominal shear stress,
Fnv
: Combined Tension and Shear in Bearing-Type Connections.
Rn
fc : Computed axial stress
fbx, fby : Computed compressive bending stress
fv : computed average shear stress
3 Method of analysis
3.1 Method of analysis

To analyze the substation for seismic stability, several calculation schemes are used.
3.1.1 Calculation scheme for response spectrum analysis

For complex structures with many modes in the seismic range, a detailed finite element
model is needed. The RRS method is used with damping ratio of 2% when analyzing the
whole structure and E house. The loads and modal stresses are combined using the SRSS
method. High required response spectrum (0.5g) is used. The curve of spectral
acceleration versus frequency is shown below.
Spectral Accelerations, S a (g) , for Frequencies, f(Hz):
S a (g)  1.44 f for 0.0  1.1
11
S a (g)  1.25 for 1.1  8.0
S a (g)  (1.32  5.28) / f  0.4   0.66 for 8.0  33
S a (g)  0.5 for f>33
  (3.21  0.68ln(d )) / 2.1156 , where d is the percent damping (2,5,10,etc.) and

d  20%.
3.1.2 Calculation scheme for static coefficient analysis

The static analysis is used to calculate the bolts connected to the ground and separate
parts of the substation. A factor of 1.0 times g is to be applied when analyzing the bolts
connected to the ground according to the mass distribution in each principal axis
direction(vertical and two horizontal) simultaneously. And a factor of 6.48 times g is to be
applied when analyzing separate parts of the substation according to the mass distribution
in each principal axis direction(vertical and two horizontal) simultaneously.
3.2 Loads
Below loads have been considered in this model.
3.2.1 Dead load

The dead load of the steel is applied in the vertical direction. A translational nodal
acceleration of 1.0g is applied to the vertical global Y-direction of the ANSYS model.
Vertical Translation Acceleration, a=1.0g
3.2.2 Seismic loads

The load consists of 100% of the weight of steel and lumped oil mass applied to 3 (three)
directions.
- Horizontal acceleration a = 6.48g
- Horizontal acceleration a = 6.48g
- Vertical acceleration a = 0.8*6.48g
In the method of static analysis the value of seismic loads depends on the feature of the
construction function at earthquakes. According to IEEE693-2005, “The vertical seismic
forces act simultaneously with both horizontal seismic forces. The three forces at each
component’s CG is applied using the SRSS method in the direction that produces the
most severe equipment stresses, and then combined with dead load stresses and normal
operating stresses.”
ASD = 1.0D +1.0ERRS +1.0OP
D is the dead load
ERRS is the earthquake load demand from the RRS (service load)
12
OP is the normal operating load
3.3 Combinations of loads

The combinations of loads is calculated in accordance with the ASCE standard of the
ASCE 7_Chapter 2. The combinations of load are taken into account. And the first
combination is also the IEEE 693 stated in section 3.2.2 of the report.
1 : 1.00D+1.00E+1.00OP
Where:
D : dead load
E : weight of earthquake
3.4 Name of computer program

The Analytical procedure to conduct the design, static and response spectrum analyses is
done by the computation software. The multi-purpose Finite Element Method computer
program used to perform the detailed analysis is ANSYS release R14.0.
4 Analysis result
4.1 Numeric result

This section of report presents the results of all analyses done to substantiate the
adequacy of the geometry.
Analyses are performed for substation and each assembly (surge arrester, voltage
transformer, disconnector, HGIS). The results from these analyses are summarized in
table 4-1~table 4-6. Figure 4-1~ Figure 4-4 /Table 4-1 is result of substation. Figure 4-5~
Figure 4-8/Table 4-2 is result of surge arrester assembly. Figure 4-9~ Figure 4-12 /Table
4-3 is result of voltage transformer assembly. Figure 4-13~ Figure 4-16 /Table 4-4 is
result of disconnector assembly. Figure 4-17~ Figure 4-20 /Table 4-5 is result of HGIS
assembly. Table 4-6 shows the summary of maximum stresses, load and F/f.
13
Table 4-1 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on Substation
Maximum
Maximum Contour picture of stress and
Combination Von-mises
displacement/mm displacement/( Pa and m)
stress/MPa
1 83.3 3.357 Figure 4-1～Figure 4-4
Table 4-2 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on Surge Arrester
Assembly
Maximum
stress/MPa
1 41.4 0.281 Figure 4-5～Figure 4-8
Table 4-3 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on Voltage Transformer
Assembly
Maximum
stress/MPa
1 58.2 0.476 Figure 4-9～Figure 4-12
Table 4-4 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on Disconnector

Assembly
Maximum
stress/MPa
1 51.4 7.737 Figure 4-13～Figure 4-16
Table 4-5 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on HGIS Assembly
Maximum
stress/MPa
1 78 5.91 Figure 4-17～Figure 4-20
14
Table 4-6 Summary of Maximum Stresses, Load, ect.*(MPa)
Location of Moment,
Calculated Allowable Safety
component, shear,torsion,
Component Page value value factor
Location of tension,combination,ec
(f) (F) (F/f)
stress t
Substation 13 Frame Combination 83.3 213 2.56
Surge arrester 16 Insulator Combination 41.4 105 2.54
19 tank 33 141 4.27
Voltage
18 Insulator Combination 12 105 8.75
transformer
18 base 58.2 141 2.42
21 Insulator 19.8 30 1.52
Disconnector 21 base Combination 51.4 141 2.74
22 Blade 14.5 141 9.72
24 Insulator 4.49 105 23.39
HGIS 24 base Combination 78 213 2.73
24 tank 78 213 2.73
Figure 4-1 Outline of Model for Substation
15
Figure 4-2 Mesh Distribution of Substation
Figure 4-3 Stress Distribution of Substation (Unit in the figure is Pa)
16
Figure 4-4 Displacement Distribution of Substation (Unit in the figure is m)
Figure 4-5 Outline of Model for Surge Arrester
17
Figure 4-6 Mesh Distribution of Surge Arrester
Figure 4-7(a) Stress Distribution of Surge Arrester (Unit in the figure is Pa)
18
Figure 4-7(b) Stress Distribution of Insulator (Surge Arrester)(Unit in the figure is Pa)
Figure 4-8 Displacement Distribution of Surge Arrester (Unit in the figure is m)
19
Figure 4-9 Outline of Model for Voltage Transformer
Figure 4-10 Mesh Distribution of Voltage Transformer
20
Figure 4-11(a) Stress Distribution of Voltage Transformer (Unit in the figure is Pa)
Figure 4-11(b) Stress Distribution of Insulator (Voltage Transformer) (Unit is Pa)
21
Figure 4-11(c) Stress Distribution of Insulator (Voltage Transformer) (Unit is Pa)
Figure 4-12 Displacement Distribution of Voltage Transformer (Unit in the figure is m)
22
Figure 4-13 Outline of Model for Disconnector
Figure 4-14 Mesh Distribution of Disconnector
23
Figure 4-15(a) Stress Distribution of Disconnector (Unit in the figure is Pa)
Figure 4-15(b) Stress Distribution of Insulator (Disconnector) (Unit in the figure is Pa)
24
Figure 4-15(c) Stress Distribution of Blades (Disconnector) (Unit in the figure is Pa)
Figure 4-16 Displacement Distribution of Disconnector (Unit in the figure is m)
25
Figure 4-17 Outline of Model for HGIS
Figure 4-18 Mesh Distribution of HGIS
26
Figure 4-19(a) Stress Distribution of HGIS (Unit in the figure is Pa)
Figure 4-19(b) Stress Distribution of Insulator (HGIS) (Unit in the figure is 10-6MPa)
27
Figure 4-20 Displacement Distribution of HGIS (Unit in the figure is m)
4.2 Check bolts
The maximum reaction force of the surge arrester can be obtained. The shear stress is fv,
and the tensile stress is ft. The allowable shear stress is Fv, and the allowable tensile stress
is Ft.
Table 4-7 Bolt Stresses of surge arrester
ft 2 f
Bolt fv ft Fv Ft ( )  ( v )2
Ft Fv
1 4.4061 18.157 132 264 0.08
2 7.0216 26.5361 132 264 0.11
3 1.6877 2.59936 132 264 0.02
4 2.0483 4.87969 132 264 0.02
ft 2 f
For all the bolts of the surge arrester, ( )  ( v ) 2 <1.So the bolts of the support
Ft Fv
meet requirements.
28
The maximum reaction force of the voltage transformer can be obtained. The shear stress
is fv, and the tensile stress is ft. The allowable shear stress is Fv, and the allowable tensile
stress is Ft.
Table 4-8 Bolt Stresses of voltage transformer
ft 2 f
Ft Fv
1 82.2725 3.746481088 132 264 0.623438
2 7.86012 1.770897224 132 264 0.059923
3 9.77612 95.88739483 132 264 0.370684
4 10.8813 40.5795392 132 264 0.17442
ft 2 f
For all the bolts of the voltage transformer, ( )  ( v ) 2 <1.So the bolts of the
Ft Fv
support meet requirements.
The maximum reaction force of the disconnector can be obtained. The shear stress is fv,
and the tensile stress is ft. The allowable shear stress is Fv, and the allowable tensile stress
is Ft.
Table 4-9 Bolt Stresses of disconnector
ft 2 f
bolt fv ft Fv Ft ( )  ( v )2
Ft Fv
1 69.3498 58.728 132 264 0.570533
2 11.9439 21.04 132 264 0.120585
3 51.0922 21.27 132 264 0.395357
4 34.416 88.213 132 264 0.423825
5 57.7272 33.662 132 264 0.455536
6 68.8856 23.63 132 264 0.529482
7 35.4589 56.36 132 264 0.343127
8 63.7178 7.892 132 264 0.483635
9 7.66253 1.102 132 264 0.058199
10 86.9544 13.315 132 264 0.660673
11 91.3758 10.596 132 264 0.693403
12 3.1325 0.0013 132 264 0.023731
13 38.8985 2.7434 132 264 0.294869
14 12.7237 13.42 132 264 0.108973
29
ft 2 f
For all the bolts of the disconnector, ( )  ( v ) 2 <1.So the bolts of the support meet
Ft Fv
requirements.
The maximum reaction force of the HGIS can be obtained. The shear stress is fv, and the
tensile stress is ft. The allowable shear stress is Fv, and the allowable tensile stress is Ft.
Table 4-10 Bolt Stress of HGIS
ft 2 f
Ft Fv
1 60.0952 161.28 132 264 0.761891
2 39.2591 49.08 132 264 0.350741
3 36.6753 16.847 132 264 0.285078
4 83.6879 78.4069 132 264 0.700115
5 7.28687 48.0302 132 264 0.190123
6 72.9578 116.179 132 264 0.706508
7 59.078 78.1749 132 264 0.536653
8 93.4754 106.877 132 264 0.815698
9 37.1395 56.126 132 264 0.352648
10 66.0928 48.1324 132 264 0.532864
11 58.5713 16.299 132 264 0.447997
12 69.9095 36.1264 132 264 0.54701
13 37.4214 18.9833 132 264 0.292473
14 38.8533 27.38 132 264 0.31208
ft 2 f
For all the bolts of the HGIS, ( )  ( v ) 2 <1.So the bolts of the support meet
Ft Fv
requirements.
4.3 Check welds.

Table 4-11 Reaction of base
Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz
171570 171570 257350 23920 356.3 -233.3
The unit of force is N, and the unit of moment is N  m.
The tensile stress of weld in X direction is

257350  1000  2230 / 2
x   0.30MPa
1/12  0.7  5  2  22303 +9380  0.7  5 11152  2
The shear stress of weld in X direction is
30
171570
  2.61MPa <145MPa
2  9380  0.7  5
The tensile stress of weld in Y direction is

356.3  1000  9380 / 2
y   2.03E-03MPa
1/12  0.7  5  2  93803 +2230  0.7  5  46902  2
257350
z   1.3MPa
2  (9380  4690)  0.7  5  2
  1.3  0.3  2.03  103  1.6MPa

The shear stress of weld in Y direction is
171570
  10.99MPa <145MPa
2  2230  0.7  5
 e  1.32  3 10.992  19.10MPa <145MPa
So using fillet weld of 5mm thick meets the requirements.
5 Simplified analysis result

The static coefficient analysis was carried out following the Chilean seismic regulation.
5.1 Surge arrester analysis
Seismic acceleration 1.37 [g]
Surge arrestor weight 0.53955 [kN]
damping 2.0%
Static calculation factor 1.2
Rigid structure factor 1.5
Terminals pull momentum 1.1 [kN.m]
Wind momentum 0.06 [kN.m]
2% damping seismic momentum 0.406 [kN.m]
Total momentum 2.0% damper isolator 1.566 [kN.m]
SML momentum declared resisted 75.93 [kN.m] Review
Lower insulator safety factor 48.5 > 2
Check the stress of the bolt which has the most unfavorable stress.
Its maximum tension force is 1.566/0.265/2=2.955kN.
The maximum tension stress f t = 2.955  1000 / (3.14  16 / 4)  14.704 MPa . Its safety
2
factor is 264/14.704=18.0
Its maximum shear force is 1.849/4=0.462kN
The maximum shear stress f v = 0.462  1000 / (3.14  16 / 4)  2.300 MPa . Its safety
2
factor is 132/2.3=57.4
31
ft 2 f 14.704 2 2.3 2
( )  ( v )2  ( ) ( )  0.0584  1 .
Ft Fv 264 132
So the surge arrester is O.K.
5.2 HGIS analysis
Seismic acceleration 1.37 [g]

HGIS weight 29.43 [kN]
damping 2.0%
Static calculation factor 1.2
Rigid structure factor 1.5
Wind momentum 0.36 [kN.m]
2% damping seismic momentum 47.578 [kN.m]
Total momentum 2.0% damper isolator 47.937 [kN.m]
SML momentum declared resisted 1107.747 [kN.m]
The maximum tension stress f t = 3.632  1000 / (3.14  16 / 4)  18.073MPa . Its safety
2
factor is 264/18.073=14.6
2
factor is 132/7.77=17.0
ft 2 f 18.073 2 7.77 2
( )  ( v )2  ( ) ( )  0.0903  1 .
Ft Fv 264 132
So the HGIS is O.K.
32
5.3 Disconnector analysis
When the disconnector is open:

Length semi arm 500 mm
Weight semi arm 150 N
Weight insulator 1100 N
Height insulator 1400 mm
Surface wind 402500 mm2
Wind speed 80 km/h
Wind F 127.2 N
l short circuit 31.5 kArms
F short circuit - N
Pull terminals 1000 N
Damping 2 %
Seismic acceleration 1.37 g
Static calculation factor 1.2 -
Factor rigid structure 1.5 -
Total momentum 3.85691 kN.m
Cantilever force equivalent 2.75 kN
Cantilever force resisted 30 kN
Security factor 10.89 - >2
When the disconnector is closed:

Length semi arm 500 mm
Weight semi arm 150 N
Weight insulator 1100 N
Height insulator 1400 mm
Surface wind 402500 mm2
Wind speed 80 km/h
Wind F 127.2 N
l short circuit 31.5 kArms
F short circuit 1580 N
Pull terminals 1000 N
Damping 2 %
Factor rigid structure 1.5 -
Total momentum 6.06891 kN.m
Cantilever force equivalent 4.33 kN
Cantilever force resisted 30 kN
Security factor 6.92 - >2
33
The maximum tension stress ft = 12.644  1000 / (3.14  162 / 4)  62.916 MPa . Its
safety factor is 264/62.916=4.2
2
factor is 132/5.387=24.5
ft 2 f 62.916 2 5.387 2
( )  ( v )2  ( ) ( )  0.242  1 .
Ft Fv 264 132
So the disconnector is O.K.
5.4 Voltage transformer analysis

Factor structure 1.5 -
Terminals pull momentum 1.28 kN.m
Wind momentum 0.06 kN.m
Short circuit momentum 2.02 kN.m
2% damping seismic momentum 1.45 kN.m
Total momentum 2.0% damper isolator 4.82 kN.m
SML momentum declared resisted 14.75 kN.m
Anchor momentum 12.24 kN.m
The maximum tension stress f t = 4.547 1000 / (3.14  16 / 4)  22.627 MPa . Its safety
2
factor is 264/22.627=11.6
2
factor is 132/6.142=21.5
ft 2 f 22.627 2 6.142 2
( )  ( v )2  ( ) ( )  0.0975  1 .
Ft Fv 264 132
So the voltage transformer is O.K.
34

Rev. B Seismic Analysis Qualification Tgood Substation - Rev B W Comments

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Rev. B Seismic Analysis Qualification Tgood Substation - Rev B W Comments

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

SEISMIC ANALYSIS QUALIFICATION FOR TGOOD SUBSTATION

SEISMIC ANALYSIS QUALIFICATION FOR TGOOD SUBSTATION

SEISMIC ANALYSIS QUALIFICATION FOR

The 66KV &13.2(6.9) KV Prefabricated Switching Station

1.1 Supplemental work and options

-The manufacturer, QING DAO TGOOD ELECTRIC Co, Ltd. Choose to

- Analysis for the strength of substation

1.2 Applied loads

1.3 Equipment configurations

Technical particulars of surge arresters

Technical particulars of voltage transformer

Technical particulars of disconnector

1.4 Seismic qualification identification tag

2.1 Overall dimensions and weights

Table 2-1 Summary of Weight

No. Name of part Weight /kg

Table 2-2 Weight of E-house

NO Name of part Weight /kg

7 Cross beam 147

2.2 Maximum input accelerations

a h max - maximum horizontal acceleration

Two horizontal values of acceleration (longitudinal & traverse direction) and a

2.3 Material type and strengths

Table2-3 Material properties and chemical compositions

E7XT-1 Vanadium AI:1.8 60.0 72.0

J507 49.7 79.2

2.4 Allowable stresses

Table 2-4 Allowable Stresses of Materials

Allowable stresses ksi (N/mm2)

Steel 0.6Fy* 0.6Fy* 0.66Fy* 0.4Fy* f c fbx fby

Steel 0.6Fy* 0.6Fy* 0.66Fy* 0.4Fy* f c fbx fby

Disconnect- 0.375 Fu 0.2 Fu f c fbx fby

0.6Fy* 0.6Fy* 0.66Fy* 0.4Fy* f c fbx fby

: nominal tensile stress modified to include the effects of shearing stress,

3.1 Method of analysis

3.1.1 Calculation scheme for response spectrum analysis

Spectral Accelerations, S a (g) , for Frequencies, f(Hz):

S a (g)  1.44 f for 0.0  1.1

S a (g)  1.25 for 1.1  8.0

S a (g)  (1.32  5.28) / f  0.4   0.66 for 8.0  33

S a (g)  0.5 for f>33

  (3.21  0.68ln(d )) / 2.1156 , where d is the percent damping (2,5,10,etc.) and

3.1.2 Calculation scheme for static coefficient analysis

3.2.1 Dead load

3.2.2 Seismic loads

OP is the normal operating load

3.3 Combinations of loads

3.4 Name of computer program

4.1 Numeric result

Table 4-1 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on Substation

1 41.4 0.281 Figure 4-5～Figure 4-8

1 58.2 0.476 Figure 4-9～Figure 4-12

Table 4-4 Summary of Maximum Von-mises Stresses and Displacement on Disconnector

Table 4-6 Summary of Maximum Stresses, Load, ect.*(MPa)

Figure 4-1 Outline of Model for Substation

Figure 4-2 Mesh Distribution of Substation

Figure 4-3 Stress Distribution of Substation (Unit in the figure is Pa)

Figure 4-4 Displacement Distribution of Substation (Unit in the figure is m)

Figure 4-5 Outline of Model for Surge Arrester

Figure 4-6 Mesh Distribution of Surge Arrester

Figure 4-8 Displacement Distribution of Surge Arrester (Unit in the figure is m)

Figure 4-9 Outline of Model for Voltage Transformer

Figure 4-10 Mesh Distribution of Voltage Transformer