Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
ALASKA AIRLINES: IMPLEMENTATION OF KOTTER’S STEPS 2
Alaska Airlines, a previous giant, is trying to improve itself from the current pre-crisis status quo
that is eating into its reserves and reducing customer loyalty and goodwill (Avollo, Patterson &
Baker, 2017). In this respect, Kotter's steps of organizational change come in handy, and as the
first two steps of establishing a sense of urgency and creating a guiding team are implemented,
some deficiencies are noted. In the end, it is essential to maintain originality throughout the
change process.
Step 1
The first two steps in Kotter’s process are focused on creating a basis on which the whole
organization effort is based. Step one is establishing a sense of urgency. This concept is rooted in
the notion that after a long time of doing things in the same way and working with only one form
of organizational culture, the members of the organization including employees and the
management are usually at rest and tend to be uncomfortable at the idea of change (Gupta, 2011).
By creating a sense of urgency, one is just trying to make the organization’s member to wake up
and realize that the current cultures and traditions are not working (Gupta, 2011). In this respect,
Step 2
The second step in Kotter’s change strategies is to create a guiding team. In Kotter’s story
about organization change, Fred informed the council about the impending danger of their
iceberg which was about to be destroyed. This is why the council which had five members
decided to pool in their thoughts to think of a way to save the colony (Kotter & Rathgeber,
ALASKA AIRLINES: IMPLEMENTATION OF KOTTER’S STEPS 3
2006). With different perceptions and skills, a guiding team is mandated to come up with a plan
that will help save the situation (Gupta, 2011). In the end, the guiding team is a key determinant
According to Kotter the first step to achieving organization change is by building a sense
of urgency. The case study of Alaska Airlines begins by spelling out the red flags in the
organization. First is that although the company had recovered from an all-time operational low,
it was still on a pre-crisis status quo with 70-75 percent on-time flights and four mishandled bags
per a thousand (Avollo et al., 2017). Another urgent case was in Seattle, the airline's central hub,
which was also struggling with on-time flights and baggage mishandling (Avollo et al., 2017).
Notably, Alaska Airlines started by creating a senior executive committee and a few other
persons who were the guiding team for the process. The committee consisted of Bill Ayer,
president and chief executive officer (CEO); Brad Tilden, executive vice-president (EVP) of
finance and chief financial officer; Glenn Johnson, EVP of airport service and maintenance &
engineering; the company's chief counsel among others (Avollo et al., 2017). Notably, the
members of the guiding team have to be drawn from different departments to bring out a broad
perception of the urgency of the matter at hand (Gupta, 2011). What is vital in this case is that the
senior executive committee was guided by the concern that the airline was steadily draining its
It is only right that I acknowledge that Alaska has worked well towards starting its
groundwork on the company's change efforts. However, it is important to note that even then,
there is more that should have been done. For instance, when implementing Kotter's first step of
establishing a sense of urgency, Alaska Airlines should have gone a notch higher and informed
all of its employees and other members about the impending danger. Only raising the importance
of the matter among the senior management is selfish. This concept is borrowed from the school
of thought that to ensure change in an organization, every member must be part of the team
On Kotter’s second step of creating a guiding team, the senior executive committee is the
team that was mandated with executing the change effort. The team which draws from various
parts of the organization to a large extent conforms to Kotter’s advice on how a guiding team
should be formed. In the second step, another course is to develop prerequisite strategies to
achieve the vision. In this case, the strategy should not be focused on an outside entity but the
team's members to assure originality. Therefore, asking the committee’s members to embark on
the challenge by looking at the problem through Warren Buffet or a Carlyle group’s eye is only
Conclusion
In conclusion, Kotter’s first two steps of establishing an urgency and creating a guiding
team provide a basis for the change process which if not looked into can lead to challenges in the
future. The step of establishing a sense of urgency is seen in Alaska’s case as the company
sought to elevate itself from the pre-crisis status quo that was depleting its reserves and reducing
customer loyalty. On the other hand, the senior executive committee is meant to be the guiding
ALASKA AIRLINES: IMPLEMENTATION OF KOTTER’S STEPS 5
team that will lead the change effort. In the end, it is important to note that originality is key in
References
Avollo, B. J., Patterson, C. & Baker, B. (2017). Alaska Airlines: Navigating change. Ontario:
Ivey Publishing.
Kotter, J. P. & Rathgeber, H. (2006). Our iceberg is melting. New York; Macmillan.
Gupta, P. (2011). Leading innovation change: The Kotter way. International Journal of