Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Survey Highlights
FICCI has conducted a survey to analyze the state of preparedness of commercial banks
(which includes Public sector banks, Private banks and foreign banks) in Implementation
of Basel II norms. The survey questionnaire covered some of the most important aspects
related to Implementation of Basel II. Based upon the data collated, some of the
important findings of the survey are enumerated as below:
77 percent of respondent banks are still in the process of putting in place a robust
Management Information System (MIS) in order to comply with the requirements of
Pillar III – Market Discipline of the new norms.
All the respondent banks already have 70-90 % level of computerization in their
bank. However 60 percent of these banks are of an opinion that lower level of
computerization would not hinder their progress in implementing these norms.
Perhaps this is because banks feel that lower level of the computerization in the rural
areas is not likely to effect the implementation of Basel II norms because the bulk of
banks operations are in urban areas, which already have 100% computerization.
30% 27%
25%
20%
20%
15% 13%
10% 7%
5%
0%
Less than 1.0 % b/w 1-2% b/w 2-3% more than 3%
.
* The rest of the respondent banks didn’t quote the figure.
87% of the respondents were completely satisfied with the support given by the
RBI in respect to Basel II implementation. However some of them felt that there
should be consistency in implementation of these norms in terms of timing and
approach. Further there should be greater consultation with internationally active
banks that face significant cross-border implementation challenges.
To a question on comfort level with the stricter disclosure requirements under the
Basel II norms, 50 percent of respondents expressed that they were completely
comfortable with these requirements, whereas rest felt that they were comfortable to
some extent.
Operational risk measurement is one of the new planks of the Basel II accord.
73 percent of respondents quoted that capital allocation to operational risk will not be
counter productive. They instead believe that explicit charge on operational risk will
direct more focus on it, which will further enhance operational risk management and
operational efficiency for the banks. Also such an allocation would create a cushion
for the claims or losses on this account.
However the remaining felt that in the Indian context, capital requirements are
too high as the Indian banks, unlike their foreign counterparts are not much involved
in speculative activities such as derivatives. Hence the capital requirement for
operational risk should be lower for the Indian Banks than what is specified in Basel
II Accord.