Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

Northcentral Technical College

Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

1 - The instructor provided many ways for me to connect with him or her.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 61 77.22% 3.77 3.64 3.60

Agree (3) 18 22.78%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.77 0.42 4.00 598 3.64 0.55 4.00 1346 3.60 0.57 4.00

2 - The instructor provided many ways for me to work with other students.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 51 64.56% 3.66 3.50 3.48

Agree (3) 16 20.25%


Disagree (2) 4 5.06%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
Not Applicable (0) 8 10.13%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.66 0.58 4.00 598 3.50 0.67 4.00 1346 3.48 0.66 4.00

3 - The instructor actively involved me in a variety of learning activities (such as short lectures, role play, peer teaching, scenarios, labs, discussions, discussion
boards, mind mapping, group work, etc.)

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 62 78.48% 3.78 3.57 3.49

Agree (3) 17 21.52%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.78 0.41 4.00 598 3.57 0.62 4.00 1346 3.49 0.66 4.00

4 - The instructor provided me feedback in a timely manner.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 63 79.75% 3.80 3.62 3.53

Agree (3) 16 20.25%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.80 0.40 4.00 598 3.62 0.58 4.00 1346 3.53 0.67 4.00

Page 1 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

5 - The instructor provided feedback that helped me learn.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 60 75.95% 3.75 3.56 3.48

Agree (3) 18 22.78%


Disagree (2) 1 1.27%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.75 0.47 4.00 598 3.56 0.63 4.00 1346 3.48 0.69 4.00

6 - The instructor defined how long learning activities and assessments should take.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 61 77.22% 3.77 3.59 3.53

Agree (3) 18 22.78%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.77 0.42 4.00 598 3.59 0.60 4.00 1346 3.53 0.62 4.00

7 - The instructor motivated me to do my best work.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 59 74.68% 3.75 3.55 3.47

Agree (3) 20 25.32%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.75 0.44 4.00 598 3.55 0.63 4.00 1346 3.47 0.70 4.00

8 - The instructor provided clear expectations.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 59 74.68% 3.75 3.57 3.50

Agree (3) 20 25.32%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.75 0.44 4.00 598 3.57 0.64 4.00 1346 3.50 0.68 4.00

9 - The instructor provided information on how I would be graded, before I was graded.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 64 81.01% 3.80 3.63 3.58

Agree (3) 14 17.72%


Disagree (2) 1 1.27%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.80 0.43 4.00 598 3.63 0.61 4.00 1346 3.58 0.61 4.00

Page 2 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

10 - The instructor taught in a way that fit my learning style.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 57 72.15% 3.72 3.46 3.37

Agree (3) 22 27.85%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.72 0.45 4.00 598 3.46 0.71 4.00 1346 3.37 0.79 4.00

11 - If I asked my instructor for additional help, the instructor gave it.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 52 65.82% 3.79 3.61 3.56

Agree (3) 14 17.72%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
Not Applicable (0) 13 16.46%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.79 0.41 4.00 598 3.61 0.57 4.00 1346 3.56 0.62 4.00

12 - The instructor assessed my learning in a variety of ways (such as quizzes, written assignments, tests, presentations, projects. etc.).

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 57 72.15% 3.71 3.58 3.54

Agree (3) 21 26.58%


Disagree (2) 1 1.27%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.71 0.48 4.00 598 3.58 0.60 4.00 1346 3.54 0.61 4.00

13 - Overall, I was satisfied with this learning experience.

Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means


Strongly Agree (4) 62 78.48% 3.78 3.55 3.47

Agree (3) 17 21.52%


Disagree (2) 0 0.00%
Strongly Disagree (1) 0 0.00%
0 25 50 100 Course Instructional Area Division

Response Rate Mean STD Median Instructional Area Mean STD Median Division Mean STD Median

79/254 (31.10%) 3.78 0.41 4.00 598 3.55 0.69 4.00 1346 3.47 0.74 4.00

Page 3 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

14 - What did the instructor do that was most helpful to your learning in this course?
Response Rate 43/254 (16.93%)

Page 4 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

• Creating an open enviornment in the classroom making it easy to speak out about topics (even the more difficult ones). He encouraged us to disagree with each other (in
a respectful way) to get a good conversation going and to see both sides of a topic.

• Dr. B always portrayed such a positive attitude and from his feedback on assignments, you can really tell that he is excited about teaching this class. He kept everything
at an upbeat level throughout the semester and really encouraged us to contact him if we were struggling at all.

• Dr. B has a great way of teaching. I hope to have more classes with him.

• Dr. B was a great instructor, who gave back great information on the work you submitted. Overall, very pleased with his teachings and assignments.

• Dr. B was extremely responsive to me. He graded assignments as soon as possible and provided great feedback. I enjoyed receiving the kudos emails.

• Dr. B. was very helpful to my learning in this course by providing clear expectations of our success for the course. He went over chapters we were studying in class but
leaving out parts for us to find on our own by reading for ourselves. That helped me understand what was being discussed more, and helped me make the connections to
understand the course competencies as a whole.

• Fast response time on grading.

• For the short answer exams, he had me answer questions that I usually don't think about or that I had to really think about.

• Gave clear examples of the task at hand and what we needed to accomplish threw out the course. Everything was set up nicely and was easily accessible.

• Gave good and informative input to my assignments.

• Great communication, and helpful study guides!

• Great instructor!

• Having fast response times to my questions and having my questions answered in a way that made sense helped me a lot.

• He gave me multiple quizzes along with prepared me for the mid term exam multiple modules before I had to complete it.

• He provided feedback almost immediately and was very understanding of my schedule.

• He related a lot of things to real life experiences and that helped with learning the information better!

• He was a great teacher and taught in a fun engaging way.

• He was very flexible with his schedule to meet with me.

• I loved everything about Dr. B's class. I took 2 college classes at NTC through my highschool, and Dr. B really made it fun to come to my first course.

• I loved the in-class activities; they really helped me grasp the information better and gave me the chance to understand other people's perspectives. I also loved that he
was very nonjudgmental and that the classroom was a safe space to open up about our thoughts and ideas about subjects.

• I really like how the class is set up and ran.

• I really liked the discussion boards and videos incorporated in this course.

• kept me on track when falling behind

• Loved working with this instructor, provided positive feedback as well as constructive criticism as needed. Was able to contact with prompt response. Overall, great
experiance.

• Made the PowerPoints easily accessible in the modules for the learning needed for the tests.

• Playing "devils advocate" to help the class understand more of what he was trying to teach us. Always went into more detail about a subject when someone had
questions or was confused.

• Professor Buemi, give lots of examples to contents being learn in class, and he also gives you a heads up if an assignment is going to be due soon.

• Provide me feedback on my assignments.

• Provided content that was easily understood

• Provided feedback in a timely manner.

• Provided positive feedback on my assignments for what needed to be different or was good as it was.

• Provided reminders on how you should be doing in the course. Checked up on you.

• Sam's video's were helpful along with power point presentations that provided helpful and notable study guides.

• Simply the best Sociology instructor I've ever met in my student experience. I used to treat Sociology as a boring subject mostly because my previous teachers didn't
show as much interest and devotion as Samuel did. And Samuel changed my perception of Sociology completely. He always was so enthusiastic and energetic, he
genuinely enjoyed teaching. I can't thank Sam enough for making Sociology stand out so much.

Page 5 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

• The instructor in this class had an infectiously positive attitude about the course and the material presented. I felt as though he provided well thought out, useful feedback
on graded materials. The course itself was well laid out and had clear expectations and instructions throughout. It was quite clear that the instructor was well versed in the
subject matter and that he cared about sharing his knowledge. All assignments were graded in a timely fashion and there was good clear notes and feedback in each
instance. I would gladly take another course taught by this instructor and would recommend him to other learners.

• The instructor provided a good format and set expectations up front of what was to be expected.

• The most helpful part in this course was the engagement of the students and the instructor. Having the students give their opinions/bias of the topics in class and relating
it to the learning plan, in my opinion, could be the most beneficial to a person when it comes to learning about society and ourselves. Overall, this course was the most
enjoyable and educational experience I've had this semester. Thank you.

• The visuals were great, as well as all of the visuals and activities we did. The more you interact with a class and get them involved, the more they will want to be there
and not be bored.

• This course was laid out beautifully for online learning. I was able to follow each module easily and teach my self the materials. I took a lot away from this course and I
am grateful for it. The essays and discussion boards made me use critical thinking to evaluate the information from our text which allowed me to further my knowledge on
each individual subject we looked at.

• Very clear expectations. Assignments were well explained and helpful in my learning of the material. Used current videos and topics to reinforce the learning.

• Very informational PowerPoints that went with each module.

• Very open to letting us learn at our own pace. My entire family got sick and there was a few days I could not do anything, Mr. Buemi was understanding and allowed me
the time I needed to keep myself and successfully finish this course.

• Was very clear with what was expected.

Page 6 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

15 - What could the instructor have done to make this a better learning experience for you?
Response Rate 33/254 (12.99%)

Page 7 of 8
Northcentral Technical College
Winterm and Spring 2018 Student Feedback

Report: 1
Response Rate: 79/254 (31.10 %)

• Change nothing

• Dr. B. Could have used less videos in class and implemented more class discussion on view points, and have a paper on our takes of the course as a whole and how
each chapter connect. There were still a lot of class discussions, but I believe having an assigned written paper would have been a nice way to be sure all materials were
fully understood.

• explained expectations on discussion questions more

• Have a discussion board before having to complete the mid term essay.

• He could have given some work time in class.

• He was a great teacher! The only thing I would change is perhaps being more clear about what is expected of us from the Mid-term Written Assignment.

• I didn't always like the structure of the class/reading/quizzes, but that's more of a personal thing compared to some of the class structures. I definitely can't say that it
affected my quality of work or ability to do the work, but it wasn't my favorite set up.

• I have no criticism for the instructor, as I feel he did an excellent job. My main complaint for this course would be with the text book. Many of the suggested "essays" at
the end of the chapters were tough to get through and did not add much learning value. There were several occasions where I had to look to outside resources to find
answers to short answer quizzes that were not well explained in the textbook. The fact that the instructor provided quality power points for each module helped, but the
text book itself was somewhat lacking in my opinion. I feel that I read at an above average level and that if the readings were difficult for me to get through, others probably
had a hard time as well.

• If you already have the textbook I do not think that buying the Pearson should have been required. While the practice exams were a nice feature, there was no graded
material in the Pearson program.

• I'm not sure.. Can't think of any because he's doing good on his own!

• My learning experience was good. Change nothing

• n/a

• N/A

• N/A

• N/A

• n/a

• N/A

• N/A

• N/A

• Nothing

• Nothing

• Nothing

• Nothing else. Everything Sam provided was awesome.

• Nothing he is an awesome professor!!

• Nothing I can think of.

• Nothing that I can think of.

• Nothing the experience was perfect in every way possible. I liked everything about the class and how easy it was for me to follow threw with things at my own pace.

• Nothing, I always enjoy Dr. B's classes. The videos and assignments are kept relevant and insightful.

• Nothing.

• Nothing. He is awesome!!!!

• There is nothing he needs to improve on. He is a genuine person who cares for his students. He was always welcoming and made sure our questions were answered.
The atmosphere was always enjoyable. Keep him!

• Though I really liked not having homework for this class, I felt like I didn't really know if I was fully understanding the material until I took the test. Sometimes the tests
were really difficult because of that. Maybe if some small discussion assignments or quizzes were implemented, that would help out students like me who need more
reassurance that I'm understanding everything.

• was an online class so did what he could

Page 8 of 8

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi