Monitoring Report: UNFCCC NO. 0189

MONITORING REPORT
Grid connected Bagasse based Cogeneration project of

Ugar Sugar Works Ltd (USWL)
for the period
Jan 1, 2006 - January 31, 2007
UNFCCC NO. 0189
Version 02
Date: 15 - 03-2007.
C A R E Sustainability
March 2007 C A R E Sustainability
Monitoring Report
for the period Jan 1, 2006 - January 31, 2007
CONTENTS Page No
1.0 Title of the project activity 6
1.1 Title of the CDM project 6

1.2 Version 6
1.3 UNFCCC registration code 6
1.4 Date of completion of the Monitoring report 6
2.0 Introduction 6
3.0 Reference 6
4.0 Definitions in the report 6
5.0 General description of the project 7

2.1 5.1 Project Activity
2.2 5.2 Technical Description of the project activity
6.0 Monitoring methodology and plan 8
6.1 Data for monitoring the GHG reduction 8

6.1.1 Data to monitor emissions from
the project activity 9
6.1.2 Data in order to monitor to determine the
baseline of emission by sources 10
7.0 Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) 15
7.1 Quality Management System 15

2.3 Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA)

2.4 procedures that are being undertaken
2.5 for the data monitored 16
2.6 Calibration/Maintenance of Measuring
2.7 and Analytical Instruments 17
2.8 Environmental Impacts due to the project
2.9 activity; present status 17
8.0 GHG Calculations 18
8.1 GHG emission reductions – confirming to the

methodology of AM0015
8.1.1 The Operating Margin emission factor 20
8.1.2 Build Margin emission factor 21
8.1.3 Calculations of Operating Margin
Emission Factor 22
8.1.4 Calculations of Build Margin Emission Factor 29
8.1.5 Calculations of Combined Margin
Emission Factor 32
8.2 SNM2 Turbine Power Generation and Quantity
of Power Export (EG,y) 33
8.3 Emission Reduction Calculations: CERS to USWL
for the period 1, January 2006 -3, January 2007 38
9.0 Bagasse and Steam balance check for Baseline requirement 40
10.0 Appendices 43
Tables
Table No Title Page
no
Table 6.1 Data to monitor emissions from the project 8
activity, and how this data will be archived
Table 6.2 Relevant data necessary for determining the 9
baseline of anthropogenic emissions by sources of
GHGs Relevant data necessary for determining the
baseline of anthropogenic emissions by sources of
GHGs
Table .1 2001-02 OM Calculations : Calculations of CoEF i 22
Table 8.2 2001-02 OM Calculations : Calculations of Emission 24
Factor
Table 8.3 2002-03 OM Calculations: Calculations of COEFi, 26
Table 8.4 2002-03 OM Calculations: Calculations of Emission 26
Factor
Table 8.5 2003-04 OM Calculations: Calculations of COEFi, 28
Table 8.6 2003-04 OM Calculations: Calculations of Emission 29
Factor
Table 8.7 Build Margin Calculations 30
Table 8.8 Build Margin Calculations 31
Calculations for Combined Margin Emission Factor 33
Table 8.9
Meter Reading for SNM2 TurbineeNM2 34
Table 8.10
Table 8.11 SNM2 Monthly Power Generation Report (Jan 2006- 36
Jan 2007)
Table 8.12 Exported Power Vs Sales Receipt Figures (2006- 37
2007)
Table 8.13 CERs to USWL during the period January 1, 2006 to 38
January 31, 2007
List of Figures
Page no
Figure 5.1 Project Boundary 8
Figure 8.1 Bagasse balance at USWL 42
Figure 8.2 Steam balance at USWL 42

1.0 Title of the project activity
Title: Grid connected Bagasse based Cogeneration project of Ugar Sugar Works
Limited (USWL).
Version: Version 02
UNFCCC Ref No: 0189
Date of completion of the Monitoring Report: March 15, 2007
2.0 Introduction
The purpose of this monitoring report is to calculate the Greenhouse Gas emission
reduction achieved by the USWL - CDM project for periodic verification.
This monitoring report covers the activity from 1, January 2006 till 31, January 2007.
The start date of the project activity is 23, November 2003 and of the crediting period is
1, January 2004.
3.0 Reference
The project is categorised in sectoral scope 1: “Energy Industries (renewable / non-

renewable sources)”.Approved Baseline methodology: AM0015/ Version 1, applied to
this project, has its Sectoral Scope 1.
Project Design Document: Grid connected bagasse based cogeneration project of Ugar
Sugar Works Limited (USWL).
4.0 Definitions in the report
PDD: Project Design Document

GHG: Greenhouse Gases

IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
5.0 General description of the project
5.1 Project Activity

The project activity involves installation of a new cogeneration unit of 16 MW
capacity, next to the existing one of 28 MW (which has been upgraded from 18 MW).
As a part of the project activity USWL will established a high-pressure boiler of 80
tonnes/hour (Krupp make), 22.8MW (high pressure) turbine (Shin Nippon), switch
yard, bagasse dryer and other associated equipments. For the first time in the country
and sector, the project activity will deploy the bagasse dryer of 40 tonnes per hour,
which utilises waste heat of flue gases (180-190 ºC). Also, the project would be
amongst the first to deploy high-pressure boilers and turbine in the sector.
The project participants are:
1. Government of India
2. Ugar Sugar Works Ltd (USWL)
5.2 Technical description of the project
Location of the project activity

The cogeneration plant is located at Ugarkhurd in the premises of USWL. It is
approximately 50km from Belgaum district in Karnataka, India. The plant site is
located at latitude17º12'N and longitude 51º30'E. The nearest railway station is Miraj.
Technology employed by the project activity

Uptill the year 2003, USWL had a power producing capacity of 28MW and power
export to the grid was 70 GWH. The power has been generated mainly from two
turbines SNM1 and Siemens turbine. After establishing the new power plant the total
capacity of cogeneration power generation will become 44MW.The major equipment
additions in the project activity are:
• One boiler of capacity 80TPH and 62kg/cm2
• Turbine of 22.8MW capacity (manufacturer- Shin Nippon)
• Switch yard (two numbers of 16.4/20 MVA ONAN/ONAF 11 KV/110 KV step

up grid transformers and associated equipments)
• Wet scrubber and ash handling systems for bottom ash,
• Demineralisation water treatment systems
• Bagasse dryer
And related electrical and instrumentation control and pollution control systems.
Biomass—Bagasse is the primary fuel used. With the expanded sugar mill capacity of
10000TCD bagasse production has become 127.4TPH. Total bagasse requirement for
the steam and power generation will be 127.5TPH. An additional 2500MT of cane
leave supplements the bagasse deficit of 0.1TPH or 0.05%.
The following are the novel practices in departure from the common and prevalent ones
in the sector and the region:
• High Pressure Boiler and Turbine
• Demineralisation of water with the mixed bed and condensate polishing unit
• Bagasse Dryer- using waste heat in flue gases
Figure 5.1: Project Boundary

• Use of cane leaves along with the bagasse
Cane Mill
10000 TCD Bagasse
The technology applied for the project activity is shown in Figure 1.
Boiler House
Steam production
270TPH
SNM1 Siemens SNM2
Export To Grid
6.0 Monitoring methodology and plan
Approved monitoring methodology AM0015 – “Bagasse – based cogeneration

connected to an electricity grid” -version 1 is applied to this project.
6.1 Data for monitoring the GHG reduction
In keeping with the Monitoring Methodology, the following parameters are to be

monitored in the specific project situation:
• Electricity generation from the proposed project activity; - required in the specific
project situation
• Data needed to recalculate the operating margin emission factor, if needed, based on
the choice of the method to determine the operating margin (OM), consistent with
“Bagasse based cogeneration connected to an electricity grid” (AM0015);- not required
recalculation in the specific project situation due to choice of simple OM, and ex-ante
option
• Data needed to recalculate the build margin emission factor, if needed, consistent with
“Bagasse based cogeneration connected to an electricity grid” (AM0015) baseline
methodology;-not required recalculation in the specific project situation due to choice
of ex ante option in the BM calculation in AM 0015
• Data needed to calculate baseline emissions due displacement of thermal energy at

project site (where relevant);- not required in the specific project situation as the heat
output (steam for use in the process) is same in baseline and project activity situation
• Data required to calculate CO2 emissions from fossil fuels combusted due to the
project activity at the project site; - not required in the specific project situation, as
there is no such onsite stationary or mobile fossil fuel consumption
• Data required to calculate leakage effects due to fossil fuel switch from bagasse to
other fuels outside the project boundary; - not required in the specific project situation
as the leakages are zero
6.1.1 Data to monitor emissions from the project activity; and how it will be archived?
Table 6.1
Data collected in order to monitor emissions from the project activity, and how this data will be archived:
ID number Data variable Source Data Measured Recording Proportion How will the Comment
(Please use numbers of data unit (m), frequency of data to data be
to ease cross- calculated be archived?
referencing ) (c) or monitored (electronic/
estimated paper)
(e)
15 FFi,y Physical - Mass m yearly 100% Electronically The data, if any,

Quantity, unit/yr will be archived
Confirmation or for the crediting
that no fossil volume period i.e. 10
fuels were unit/yr years plus 2 years
combusted in after crediting
boilers for (No fossil fuel
cogeneration at used ) Also refer
USWL Appendix 1
USWL Monitoring Report 11

6.1.2 Data to be monitored to determine the baseline of emission by sources of GHGs within the project boundary; How will t be
archived.?
Table 6.2:
Relevant data necessary for determining the baseline of anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs within the project boundary
and how such data will be collected and archived:
ID number Data variable Source of Data unit Measured Recording Proportion How will the Comment
(Please use data (m), frequency of data to data be
numbers to calculated be archived?
ease cross- ©, monitored (electronic/
referencing estimated paper)
to table (e),
D.3)
1EGy Electricity Main MWh Directly Hourly 100% Electronically Data will be
Quantity, control measured measurement archived for
Electricity Room and monthly crediting period 10
supplied to recording years plus 2years
the grid by after that.
SNM2 The net or
additional
electricity supplied
by the project
activity.
Also checked with
the receipt of sales.
Also refer
Appendix 2
2 EFy Emission Central tCO2/MWh c yearly 100% Electronically The Data, published

factor, Electricity Calculations, by the CEA, will be

CO2 Authority Ex-ante obtained and
emission (CEA), archived/maintained
factor of the Government in same form, for
Southern of India crediting period 10
Regional General years plus 2years
grid Review after that. Also refer
Appendix 3
3 EFOM, y Emission CEA tCO2/MWh c yearly 100% Electronically The relevant Data
factor, General Calculations, published by the
CO2 Review Ex-ante CEA, will be
operating obtained and
margin archived/maintained
emission in same form, for
factor of the crediting period 10
Southern years plus 2years
Regional after that. Also refer
grid Appendix 4
4 EFBM ,y Emission CEA tCO2/MWh c yearly 100% Electronically The relevant Data
factor, General Calculations, published by the
CO2 build Review Ex-ante CEA, will be
margin obtained and
emission archived/maintained
factor of the in same form, for
Southern crediting period 10
Regional years plus 2years
grid after that. Also refer

Appendix 5
5 Fi, y Amount of CEA Mass or m yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data
each fossil General volume Ex-ante published by the
fuel Review CEA, will be
consumed by obtained and
each power archived/maintained
source in same form for
crediting period 10
years plus 2years
after that. Also refer
Appendix 6
6 COEFi Emission IPCC tCO2/mass m Yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data
factor Default or volume will be obtained and
coefficient unit archived for
for each fuel crediting period 10
years plus 2years
Appendix 7
7 GEN m ,y Electricity CEA MWh/yr m Yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data
generation General Ex-ante published by the
by each Review CEA, will be
power source obtained and
archived/maintained
in same form for
crediting period 10
years plus 2years
Appendix 8

8 Identification CEA text e Yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data

of Plant General Ex-ante published by the
source, Review CEA, will be
Name of obtained and
source power archived/maintained
plant for OM in same form for
crediting period 10
years plus 2years
Appendix 9
9 Plant name, CEA text e Yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data
Name of General Ex-ante published by the
source power Review CEA, will be
plant for BM obtained and
archived/maintained
in same form for
crediting period 10
years plus 2years
Appendix 10
11a GEN Electrical CEA KWh c yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data
import quantity General Ex-ante published by the
Review calculations CEA, will be
obtained and
archived/maintained
in same form for
crediting period 10
years plus 2years
after that.

11b COEFi CO2 IPCC tCO2/ c yearly 100% electronically Data will be
imports emission Default mass or Ex-ante archived for
factor in the volume calculations crediting period 10
connected unit years plus 2years
electricity after that.
Information will be
obtained from local
statistics

7.0 Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA)
7.1 Quality Management System

The cogeneration plant is operated by Company’s operating personnel. The Chief
Engineer (Cogeneration) has assigned the responsibility of the project management as
also for monitoring, measurement and reporting to the Assistant Engineers
(Cogeneration).
The operation, data transfer and reporting procedures are incorporated into the ISO 9001
procedure with the company.
The personnel are adequately trained and highly competent enough to carry out the
necessary work.
7.2 Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures that are
being undertaken for the data monitored
In USWL, the QA & QC procedures are equivalent to applicable International Standards

as well as standards given by the technology supplier M/s Shin Nippon and energy meter
supplier M/s Power Care, in terms of equipment and analytical methods. The QA & QC
procedures are set and implemented in order to:
1. Secure a good consistency through planning to implementation of this CDM project

and,
2. Stipulate who has responsibility for what and,
3. Avoid any misunderstanding between people and organization involved.
4. Calibration of the export energy meter

Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures are being undertaken
for data monitored
Data Uncertainty level of Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these
(Indicate data data, or why such procedures are not necessary.
table and ID (High/Medium/Low)
number e.g.
3.-1.; 3.2.)
1 and 15 Low These data will directly be used for calculation
of emission reductions. Sales records will be
sued to ensure consistency
Others Low Default data (for emission factors) and IEA
statistics (for energy data) will be used to check
local statistics
7.3 Calibration/Maintenance of Measuring and Analytical Instruments
All measuring and analytical instruments are being calibrated as per the methodology
AM0015 and created as a protocol in USWL’s Quality management system procedures.
The calibration certificates for all the export meters of SNM2 Turbine are available at the
plant for the verification.
The maintenance methods and procedures have been incorporated as part of the ISO 9000
procedures and form an integral part of the systems and procedures for the organization.
7.4 Environmental Impacts Due to the Project Activity; Present Status
The project activity is small in size and hence the emissions and discharges due to the
project activity do not have any significant environmental impacts. Internal
Environmental Audit Reports are available at the project site. The cogeneration activity
uses bagasse as fuel, which is a carbon neutral fuel.

There are no transboundary impacts.
The host party does not consider the environmental impacts of such activities as
significant and hence excluded such activities from the Environmental Impact
Assessment Notification (1991) under Environment Protection Act (1984)
However, the USWL diligently identified the possible environmental impacts and
mitigated these to the extent feasible after an environmental impact assessment of the
project activity.
USWL has obtained an environmental clearance from the state government in addition to
consent to establish and operate from the Karnataka State pollution Control Board. The
factory has ISO 14000 accreditation and therefore any environmental impacts are
recorded.
The periodic (annual) audits as a part of ISO 14000 based management systems would
take care of any undesirable environmental impacts.
8.0 GHG Calculations
8.1 GHG emission reduction, confirming to the approved methodology of AM0015)
The project activity mainly reduces the CO2 emissions from fossil fuels by energy
generation with bagasse. The emission reduction ER y by the project activity during a
year y is the difference between the baseline emissions through substitution of the
electricity generation with fossil fuels (BE electricity, y), the baseline emissions through the
substitution of the thermal energy generation with fossil fuels (BE thermal, y), and project
emissions (PE y), emissions due to leakage (Ly) as follows:
ER y = BE electricity, y + BE thermal, y – PE y – Ly
Where,

ER y is the emission reductions of the project activity during year y in t CO2

BE electricity, y is the baseline emissions through substitution of the electricity
generation with fossil fuels during year y in t CO2
BE thermal, y are the baseline emissions due to displacement of thermal energy
during the year y in t CO2
PE y is the project emissions during the year y in t CO2
LE y is the leakage emissions during the year y in t CO2
In the specific project case, BE thermal, y, PE y and Ly are zero or not applicable.
BEelectricity, y = EG, y × EFelectricity, y
Where,
BEelectricity, y is the baseline emissions due to displacement of electricity during the
year y in tons of CO2,
EG, y is the net quantity of increased electricity generated as a result of the project
activity during the year y in MWh, and
EFelectricity, y is the CO2 baseline emission factor for the electricity displaced due to
the project activity during the year y in tons CO2/MWh.
The emission factor EF y (= EFelectricity, y) of the grid is represented as a combination of

the Operating Margin(EFOM, y) and the Build Margin(EFBM, y). The emission factor EF y
,in terms of EF OM, y and EF BM, y , is given by:
EFelectricity, y = wOM × EFOM , y + wBM × EFBM ,y…………………………..(1)
wOM and wBM are respective weight factors (where wOM + wBM = 1), and by default are
weighted equally (wOM = wBM = 0.5).

8.1.1 The Operating Margin emission factor
The Operating Margin emission factor EFOM,simple,y is defined as the generation-

weighted average emissions per electricity unit of all generating sources serving the
system, including zero- or low-operating cost power plants (hydro, geothermal, wind,
low-cost biomass, nuclear and solar generation), based on the latest year statistics data
and are derived from the following equation:
EFOM,simple,y = [∑i Fi,j,y*COEFi,y] / [∑j GENj,y] ………………….(2)
Fi,j,y and COEFi,j,y are the fuel consumption and associated carbon coefficient of the fossil
fuel i consumed in the grid in the year y. GENj,y is the electricity generation at the plant j
connected to the grid excluding zero- or low-operating cost sources. (EMy and GENy are
the total GHG emissions and electricity generation supplied to the grid by the power
plants connected to the grid excluding zero- or low-operating cost sources in the year y )
The CO2 emission coefficient COEFi is obtained as:
COEFi, = NCVi, * EFCO2,i * OXIDi……………………………….(3)
Where:
NCVi,j is the net calorific value per mass or volume unit of a fuel i,
OXIDi is the oxidation factor of the fuel (see page 1.29 in the 1996 Revised IPCC
Guidelines for default values),
EFCO2,i is the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i.
As per the approved methodology AM0015, the methodology used for the registered
CDM activity (The relevant portion in AM0015 says as given below in italics),

The Simple OM emission factor can be calculated using either of the two following
data vintages for years(s) y:
• A 3-year average, based on the most recent statistics available at the time of PDD
submission, or
• The year in which project generation occurs, if EF OM, y is updated based on ex post
monitoring.
In the registered PDD, from the above options given in AM0015 for using data vintages,
a 3-year average, based on the most recent statistics available at the time of PDD
submission was used. Hence the Simple OM, as used in the registered PDD, has been
used for the present calculations for this monitoring period. The Simple OM calculations,
as used in the registered PDD, are shown in the Tables 8.1- 8.6
8.1.2 Build margin emission factor
The Build Margin emission factor EFBM,y is given as the generation-weighted average
emission factor of the selected representative set of recent power plants represented by
the 5 most recent plants or the most 20% of the generating units built (summation is over
such plants specified by k):
EFBM,y = [∑,m Fi,m,y*COEFi,m] / [∑m GENm,y]……………………..(4)
As per the approved methodology AM0015, the Build Margin emission factor has been
calculated in the registered PDD using Option 1:
The relevant portion in AM0015 says as given below in italics:
Option 1: Calculate the Build Margin emission factor EF BM, y ex ante based on the
most recent
Information available on plants already built for sample group m at the time of PDD
submission. The sample group m consists of either:
• The five power plants that have been built most recently, or

• The power plants capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the
system
Generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently.
Project participants should use from these two options that sample group that
comprises the larger annual generation.
In the registered PDD, Build Margin emission factor EF BM,, y has been calculated, with
the option of ex-ante, based on the most recent information available on plants already
built for sample group m at the time of PDD submission. The sample group m has been
power plants capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system
generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently, and has comprised larger
annual generation. The Build Margin Calculations as used in the registered PDD are
presented in the Tables 8.7 and 8.8
8.1.3 Calculations of Operating Margin Emission Factor
Operating Margin Emission Factor

EFOM,simple,y = [∑i Fi,j,y*COEFi,y] / [∑j GENj,y] ………………….(2)
Calculations of COEFi,y
COEFi, = NCVi, * EFCO2,i * OXIDi……………………………….(3)
Where:
NCVi,j is the net calorific value per mass or volume unit of a fuel i,
OXIDi is the oxidation factor of the fuel (see page 1.29 in the 1996 Revised IPCC
Guidelines for default values
EFCO2,i is the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i.

OM Calculations - 2001-02
Table 8.1: Calculations of COEFi, using équation (3)
Net Calorific Value* Fraction of Carbon Emission Coefficient

Carbon Emission
(TJ/ 103 tonnes or Oxidised - Oxidation (tCO2/ 103 tonnes or
Type of FUEL Factor* (t C/ TJ )
TJ/Mcum) Factor** TJ/Mcum)
(EFCO2,I)
(NCVi), (OXIDi) COEFi
Steam Stations ** * ***
****Coal 20.284077 26.2 0.980 1909.7
**Furnace diesel 43.9467402 21.1 0.990 3366.0
**Light Oil 43.7792762 20.0 0.990 3178.4
**LSHS/HHS/ oil/HSD 43.7792762 20.2 0.990 3210.2
Gas
****Lignite 10.989825 27.6 0.980 1089.9
Gas Stations
*****Natural Gas (TJ/Mcum) 34.6 15.3 0.995 1931.4
**HSD 43.0926738 20.2 0.990 3159.8
**Naphtha 45.01 20.0 0.990 3267.7
Diesel Stations
**LSHS 43.7813676 20.2 0.990 3210.3
**Diesel Oil 43.0947324 20.2 0.990 3160.0
COEFi, = NCVi, * EFCO2,i * OXIDi

Sample Calculation for Coal = COEF = 20.284077 * 26.2 * 0.98 = 1909.7 tCO2/ 103 tonnes

Table 8.2 : Calculations of Operating Margin Emission Factor using equation (2)
Emission
factor
(tCO2/103
3 Gross Gross
Density 10 MT tonnes)* Auxiliary Net ele Gen
Fuel Units Consumption Emissions Electricty
(kg/Lt) (Fi,j,y) NG consumption ( GENj,y)
(tCO2) generation
=TCO2/M
Cu.m)
(COEFi,y)
Steam Stations * * * ** GWh
Coal 000 MT 52607 1.0 52607.0 1909.7100461020.2 84031 8.44 76938.78
Furnace Oil KL 129339 0.9 120.3 3366.0 404881.7 8.44 0
Light Oil KL 6849 0.8 5.7 3178.4 18002.7 8.44 0
LSHS/HHS/HSDKL 8324 0.8 6.9 3210.2 22098.6 8.44 0
Gas KL 0.0 0.0 8.44 0
Lignite 000 MT 17318.25 1.0 17318.3 1089.9 18875627.4 8.44 0
Gas stations 0
Natural Gas M Cu M 1782 1.0 1782.0 1931.4 3441674.1 10330.65 3.241 9995.834
HSD KL 5429 0.8 4.5 3159.8 14186.9 3.241 0
Naphtha KL 222352 0.8 169.0 3267.7 552204.9 3.241 0
Diesel Stations 0.0 0
LSHS KL 0 0.8 0.0 3210.3 0.0 2.3 0
Diesel KL 770168 0.8 636.9 3160.0 2012672.7 4154.98 2.3 4059.415
125802369 90994.03
OM 1382.534
* Source ;table 6.1, CEA general Review
** Table 5.5, CEA general review
Note: Values in Column 6 (blue highlights) have been taken from Table 1

Sample Calculations
Sample Calculations for Coal given in the above Table
Gross Emissions (tCO2) = Fi, y*COEF i,y

= 52607.0*1909.7=100461020.2 tCO2
Net Electricity Génération = Gross Electricity – Auxiliary Consumption

= 84031 – (84031*8.44/100)= 76938.78 GWh
Operating Margin Calculations
EFOM, simple, 2001-02 = ΣGross Emission/ΣNet Generation

= 125802369/90994.03
= 1382.534 tCO2/GWh

2002-03
Table 8.3: Calculations of COEFi, using equation (3)
Net Calorific Value* Emission Coefficient

Carbon Emission Fraction of Carbon Oxidised
(TJ/ 103 tonnes or (tCO2/ 103 tonnes or
Type of FUEL Factor* (t C/ TJ ) - Oxidation Factor**
TJ/Mcum) TJ/Mcum)
(EFCO2,I) (OXIDi)
(NCVi), COEFi
****Coal 17.4623086 26.2 0.980 1644.0
**Furnace diesel 44.9054716 21.1 0.990 3439.4
**Light Oil 44.0597784 20.0 0.990 3198.7
**LSHS/HHS/ oil/HSD 44.0597784 20.2 0.990 3230.7
Gas
****Lignite 11.2452076 27.6 0.980 1115.3
Gas Stations
*****Natural Gas (TJ/Mcum) 34.6 15.3 0.995 1931.4
**HSD 40.861216 20.2 0.990 2996.2
**Naphtha 45.01 20.0 0.990 3267.7
Diesel Stations
**LSHS 44.0618832 20.2 0.990 3230.9
**Diesel Oil 40.863168 20.2 0.990 2996.3

Emission
factor
(tCO2/103
3 Gross Gross
(tCO2) generation
=TCO2/M
Cu.m)
(COEFi,y)
Steam Stations * * * ** GWh
Coal 000 MT 65997 1.0 65997.0 1644.0108498729.0 92053.1 8.47 84256.2
Furnace Oil KL 115914 0.9 107.8 3439.4 370772.2 8.47 0
Light Oil KL 8407 0.8 7.0 3198.7 22239.5 8.47 0
LSHS/HHS/HSD KL 6093 0.8 5.0 3230.7 16279.3 8.47 0
Gas KL 0.0 0.0 8.47 0
Lignite 000 MT 17738 1.0 17738.0 1115.3 19782388.0 8.47 0
Gas Stations 0
Natural Gas M Cu M 3130 1.0 3130.0 1931.4 6045140.2 13950.1 2.25 13636.22
HSD KL 275122 0.8 227.5 2996.2 681710.7 2.25 0
Naphtha KL 485496 0.8 369.0 3267.7 1205715.6 2.25 0
Diesel Stations 0.0 0.0 0
LSHS KL 0 0.8 0.0 3230.9 0.0 4379.4 1.61 4308.892
Diesel KL 865938 0.8 716.1 2996.3 2145765.9 1.61 0
138768741 102201.3
OM 1357.798
* Source ;table 6.1, CEA general Review
** Table 5.5, CEA general review

EFOM,simple,2002-03 = 138768741/102201.3 = 1357.798 tCO2/GWh

2003-04
Table 8.5: Calculations of COEFi, using equation (3)
Net Calorific Value* Emission Coefficient

Carbon Emission Fraction of Carbon Oxidised
(TJ/ 103 tonnes or (tCO2/ 103 tonnes or
Type of FUEL Factor* (t C/ TJ ) - Oxidation Factor**
TJ/Mcum) TJ/Mcum)
(EFCO2,I) (OXIDi)
(NCVi), COEFi
****Coal 15.992812 26.2 0.980 1505.6
**Furnace diesel 43.394109 21.1 0.990 3323.7
**Light Oil 43.1303532 20.0 0.990 3131.3
**LSHS/HHS/ oil/HSD 43.1303532 20.2 0.990 3162.6
Gas
****Lignite 11.4587242 27.6 0.980 1136.4
Gas Stations
*****Natural Gas
(TJ/Mcum) 34.6 15.3 0.995 1931.4
**HSD 42.6447076 20.2 0.990 3127.0
**Naphtha 45.01 20.0 0.990 3267.7
Diesel Stations
**LSHS 43.1324136 20.2 0.990 3162.7
**Diesel Oil 42.6467448 20.2 0.990 3127.1

Emission
factor
(tCO2/103
3 Gross Gross
(tCO2) generation
=TCO2/M
Cu.m)
(COEFi,y)
Steam stations * * * ** GWh
Coal 000 MT 52985 1.0 52985.0 1505.6 79776792.0 98434.6 8.46 90107.04
Furnace Oil KL 56498 0.9 52.5 3323.7 174636.8 8.46 0
Light Oil KL 33031 0.8 27.3 3131.3 85535.6 8.46 0
LSHS/HHS/HSDKL 5310 0.8 4.4 3162.6 13888.0 8.46 0
GAS KL 0.0 0.0 8.46 0
Lignite 000 MT 20755 1.0 20755.0 1136.4 23586613.6 8.46 0
Gas Stations 0
Natural Gas M Cu M 2010 1.0 2010.0 1931.4 3882022.9 14214 2.83 13811.76
HSD KL 226981 0.8 187.7 3127.0 586973.0 2.83 0
Naphtha KL 719694 0.8 547.0 3267.7 1787339.7 2.83 0
Diesel Stations 0.0 0.0 0
LSHS KL 647451 0.8 535.4 3162.7 1693457.0 3294.75 1.74 3237.421
Diesel KL 14903 0.8 12.3 3127.1 38541.0 1.74 0
111625800 107156.2
OM 1041.711
EFOM ,simple,2003-04 = 111625800/107156.2
= 1041.711 tCO2/GWh

8.1.4 Calculations of Build Margin Emission Factor
Table 8.7: Build Margin Calculations using Equation (3)

Emission
factor
(tCO2/103
tonnes)*
NG Gross Gross
Density =TCO2/M Emissions Electricty Auxiliary Net ele
Fuel Units Consumption (kg/Lt) 103 MT Cu.m) (tCO2) generation consumption Gen TCO2/GWh
Steam stations * * * ** GWh
Coal 000 MT 52985 1.0 52985.0 1505.6 79776792.0 98434.6 8.46 90107.042
Furnace Oil KL 56498 0.9 52.5 3323.7 174636.8 8.46 0
Light Oil KL 33031 0.8 27.3 3131.3 85535.6 8.46 0
LSHS/HHS/HSD KL 5310 0.8 4.4 3162.6 13888.0 8.46 0
GAS KL 0.0 0.0 8.46 0
Lignite 000 MT 20755 1.0 20755.0 1136.4 23586613.6 8.46 0
Gas Stations 103637466.0 90107.042 1150.2
Natural Gas M Cu M 2010 1.0 2010.0 1931.4 3882022.9 14214 2.83 13811.763
HSD KL 226981 0.8 187.7 3127.0 586973.0 2.83 0
Naphtha KL 719694 0.8 547.0 3267.7 1787339.7 2.83 0
Diesel Stations 0.0 6256335.7 13811.763 452.97
LSHS KL 647451 0.8 535.4 3162.7 1693457.0 3294.75 1.74 3237.4214
Diesel KL 14903 0.8 12.3 3127.1 38541.0 1.74 0
1731998 3237.4214 534.99

Table 8.8: Build Margin Calculations using equation (4)
Installed Gross Net Total t

Type of Power Gen State Date of addition Capacity PLF Gen Gen tCO2/GWh CO2
Auxilary
MW GWh Consm % GWh
* * * * ** **
Hydro
Srisailam LBPH (Unit6) AP 4-Sep-04 150 0.5 657 0.96 650.69 0
Almatti Dam Karnataka 26-Mar-04 15 0.5 65.7 0.96 65.069 0
Sirsailam Left bank(5) AP 28-Mar-03 150 0.5 657 0.96 650.69 0
Sri Sailam LBPH AP 26-Nov-02 150 0.5 657 0.96 650.69 0
Sirsailam Left bank(2,3) AP 12-Nov-01,29-Mar-02 300 0.5 1314 0.96 1301.4 0
Sirsailam Left bank(1) AP 30-Mar-01 150 0.5 657 0.96 650.69 0
15-May-01,25-Oct-01,30-Mar-
Sharavathy Tail Race (2,3,4) Karnataka 02 180 0.5 788.4 0.96 780.83 0
Madhva Mantri Karnataka Mar-02 3 0.5 13.14 0.96 13.014 0
Madhva Mantri Karnataka Mar-02 6.6 0.5 28.908 0.96 28.63 0
Steam **
Neyveli FST TN 22-Jul-03 210 0.77 1416.49 8.46 1296.7 1150.16 1629191.7
Simadhri AP 24-Aug-02 500 0.88 3854.4 8.46 3528.3 1150.16 4433174.6
Raichur Karnataka 11-Dec-02 210 0.88 1618.85 8.46 1481.9 1150.16 1861933.3
Neyvelli TPS (1,2) TN 21-Oct-02 210 0.77 1416.49 8.46 1296.7 1150.16 1629191.7
Neyvelli TPS (Zero unit) TN 11-Oct-02 250 0.77 1686.3 8.46 1543.6 1150.16 1939513.9
Simhadri TPS AP 22-Feb-02 500 0.88 3854.4 8.46 3528.3 1150.16 4433174.6
Diesel **
Kasargode DG Kar Mar-02 21.84 0.88 168.36 1.74 165.43 534.99 90071.537
Belgaum DG Kar Mar-02 81.3 0.88 626.725 1.74 615.82 534.99 335293.77
Samayanallue DGPP TN 22-Sep-01 106 0.77 714.991 1.74 702.55 534.99 382515.34
LVS DGPP AP 18-Oct-01 36.8 0.86 277.236 1.74 272.41 534.99 148319.6
Sampalpatti DG (1-7) TN 1-Mar-01 105.66 0.77 712.698 1.74 700.3 534.99 381288.4
Wind 0 0 0

Private AP 31-Mar-04 6.2 0.25 13.578 1.74 13.342 0

Private TN 31-Mar-04 504.06 0.25 1103.89 1.74 1084.7 0
State TN 31-Mar-04 0.07 0.25 0.1533 1.74 0.1506 0
State Karnataka 31-Mar-04 2.02 0.25 4.4238 1.74 4.3468 0
Private Karnataka 31-Mar-04 138.58 0.25 303.49 1.74 298.21 0
Wind (state) AP 1-Jun-01 2.35 0.25 5.1465 1.74 5.057 0
Wind (pvt) AP 1-Jun-01 0.69 0.25 1.5111 1.74 1.4848 0
Wind (pvt) TN 1-Jun-01 69.38 0.25 151.942 1.74 149.3 0
Wind (pvt) Kar 1-Jun-01 30.78 0.25 67.4082 1.74 66.235 0
Gas **
Kuttalam CCPPGT TN 26-Nov-03 63 0.78 430.466 2.83 418.28 452.97 194989.03
Kuttalam CCPP TN 24-Mar-04 37 0.78 252.814 2.83 245.66 452.97 114517.37
Valthur GTPP TN 24-Dec-02 60 0.78 409.968 2.83 398.37 452.97 185703.84
Valthur (ST )GTPP TN 13-Mar-03 34 0.78 232.315 2.83 225.74 452.97 105232.17
Peddapuram CCGT AP 12-Sep-02 78 0.86 587.621 2.83 570.99 452.97 266175.5
Peddapuram CCGT AP 26-Jan-02 142 0.86 1069.77 2.83 1039.5 452.97 484575.91
Pillaiperumalanallur CCGT (st
U-1) TN 5-Apr-01 105.5 0.78 720.86 2.83 700.46 452.97 326529.25
Tanir Bavi CCGT (Unit1,2,3,4) Karanataak 8-May-01 170 0.88 1310.5 2.83 1273.4 452.97 593617.4
Tanir Bavi CCGT (St-10 Kar 21-Nov-01 50 0.88 385.44 2.83 374.53 452.97 174593.35
Kovikalappal GT (Unit-ST-1) TN 30-Mar-01 38 0.78 259.646 2.83 252.3 452.97 117612.43
28496 27046 19827215
BM= 733.0994 t CO2
Total Gross Electrical Ene Gen for WR grid (2003-2004) = 139451.1 Percentage
Total Gross Ele Gen from the power plant which is added to the ele system = 28496.03 20.4344245 %

EFBM,y = [∑,m Fi,m,y*COEFi,m] / [∑m GENm,y]……………………..(4)

=19827215/27046
= 733.0994 tCO2/GWh
8.1.5 Calculations of Combined Margin Emission Factor
Table 8.9: Calculations for Combined Margin Emission Factor
Simple OM TCO2/GWh
2001-2002 1382.53 tCO2/GWh
2002-2003 1357.80 tCO2/GWh
2003-2004 1041.71 tCO2/GWh
Total 3782.04
Simple OM EFOM,y 1260.68 tCO2/GWh
BM EFBM,y 733.10 tCO2/GWh
CM EFy 996.89 tCO2/GWh

8.2 SNM2 Turbine Generation and Power Export (EG,y)
Table 8.10: Meter Reading for SNM2

SNM2 – Meter READINGS
52G3 K.W.H M.W.H 52F3 K.W.H M.W.H 52F4 K.W.H M.W.H TOTALEXPORT
(a) (b) ( c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)

31/01/2006 89324 10045000 10045 22527 4940000 4940 51793 4384000 4384 9324000
28/02/2006 98864 9540000 9540 25779 3252000 3252 56307 4514000 4514 7766000
31/03/2006 107588 8724000 8724 26725 946000 946 60757 4450000 4450 5396000
30/04/2006 113033 5445000 5445 28176 1451000 1451 62932 2175000 2175 3626000
31/05/2006 113033 0 0 28176 0 0 62932 0 0 0
30/06/2006 113033 0 0 28176 0 0 62932 0 0 0
31/07/2006 113033 0 0 28176 0 0 62932 0 0 0
31/08/2006 113033 0 0 28176 0 0 62932 0 0 0
30/09/2006 113033 0 0 28176 0 0 62932 0 0 0
31/10/2006 113033 0 0 28176 0 0 62932 0 0 0
113494 461000 245000

30/11/2006 461 28421 245000 245 62932 0 0
124751 11257000
31/12/2006 11257 35203 6782000 6782 63198 266000 266 7048000
135275 10524000 10524 40990 5787000 5787 63230 32000 32 5819000
31/01/2007
Note: 52 G3 is total generation meter for SNM2 and 52 F3, 52 F4 are Export Feeders
The values given in column (a), (d) and (g) in the above table are cumulative.

Sample calculation for 28/02/2006
(1) Total generation recorded by 52G3 feeder from SNM2

(b) i = (a)i- (a)i-1 × 1000
(b) 28/02/2006 = (98864- 89324) ×1000 = 9540000 KWh
(2) Total generation in MWh

(c) i = (b)i / 1000
(c) 28/02/2006 = 9540000/1000 = 9540 MWh
(3) Units recorded by 52F3 Feeder for SNM2

(e) i = (d)i – (d)i-1 × 1000
(e) 28/02/2006 = (25779- 22527) ×1000= 3252000 KWh
(4) Export recorded by 52F3 Feeder for SNM2 in MWh

(f) i=(e)i/1000
(f) 28/02/2006= 3252000/1000 = 3252 MWh
(5) Units recorded by 52F4 Feeder for SNM2

(h) i= (g)i-(g)i-1 × 1000
(h) 28/02/2006= (56307-51793) = 4514000 KWh
(6) Export recorded by 52F4 Feeder for SNM2 in MWh

(i) i= (h)i/1000
(i) 28/02/2006 = (4514000)/1000 = 4514 MWh
(7) Total export from SNM2 in MWh

(j) i= (f)i + (i)i
(j) 28/02/2006= 3252+4514= 7766 MWh

Table 8.11: SNM2 Monthly Report (2006-2007) of power generation and export
S .N. M 2
MON MON
2006 GENERATION EXPORT
K.W.H. M.W.H K.W.H. M.W.H
JANUARY 10045000 10045 9324000 9324
FEBRUARY 9540000 9540 7766000 7766
MARCH 8724000 8724 5396000 5396
APRIL 5445000 5445 3626000 3626
MAY 0 0 0 0
JUNE 0 0 0 0
JULY 0 0 0 0
AUGUST 0 0 0 0
SEPTEMBER 0 0 0 0
OCTOBER 0 0 0 0
NOVEMBER 461000 461 245000 245
DECEMBER 11257000 11257 7048000 7048
JANUARY 10524000 10524 5819000 5819
55996000 55996 39224000 39224

TOTAL

Table 8.12: Exported Power vs Sales Receipt Figures for the turbines SNM1, SNM2 & SIEMENS (2006-2007)
Total Gen From
1, Jan 2006 to (SNM1, SNM2 & Total Exp From BILLING EXP from
31, Jan 2007 SIEMENS) Mwh (SNM1,SNM2&SIEMENS) (SNM1,SNM2&SIEMENS)
JANUARY 22149.72 12190 12177
FEBRUARY 22263.88 12203 12202
MARCH 21813.36 11051 11076
APRIL 11083.49 5193 5255
MAY 1536.4 996 968
JUNE 3665.65 2542 2564
JULY 4490.63 3120 3126
AUGUST 0 0 0
SEPTEMBER 0 0 0
OCTOBER 0 0 0
NOVEMBER 711.68 234 212
DECEMBER 22315.76 11992 11948
JANUARY,
2007
20800 11178 11172
70700
130830.57 70699
Note: The variation between Export Figures vs Sales Receipt is due to different timings for noting the readings adopted by USWL and
KPTCL. USWL notes the readings at 4.00 am daily, while KPTCL generally note their reading at 12.00 midnight

8.3 Emission Reduction Calculations, CERs to USWL
Emission Reductions can be calculated using equation (1)
BEelectricity,y = EG,y × EFelectricity, y
EG2006-07 = 39224 MWh

EF electricity = 0.996 tCO2/MWh
BE electricity = 39224 × 0.996 = 39067.104 tCO2/MWh
Table 8.13: CERS to USWL during the period January 1, 2006 to January 31, 2007
Sr EG,y (MWh) EF,y

Year CERs
No (tCO2/MWh)
Jan 1, 2006 - 39224 0.996

1. 39067.104
January 31, 2007

9.0 Bagasse and Steam balance check for Baseline

requirement
The bagasse and steam balance is monitored and recorded to check that the
1. Purchased bagasse is not used in the project activity
2. Bagasse is not diverted to project activity from other existing activities.
The calculation of the steam and bagasse balance for the period 1st January 2006 to 31st
January 2007 is given in Appendix 13.
The bagasse and steam balance will be done as below:

Figure 8.1: Bagasse balance at USWL
Figure 8.2: Steam balance at USWL

10.0 Appendices
Appendix 1
Name of item FFi,y
Description Amount of fossil fuel consumed at the

project activity
Value in period 0 ton
Recording frequency Yearly
Background data Furnace oil consumption file available at
plant
Calculation method Measured from the furnace oil data
source available at plant
Archiving mode Electronic
Year Fossil Fuel Consumption (Tonnes)

1st January 2006 – 31st January 2007 0

Appendix 2
Name of item EG, y

Description Electricity Quantity, Electricity supplied
to grid by SNM2
Value in period 39224 MWh
Method of monitoring Measured using Energy Meter
Recording frequency Hourly
Background data Log sheets available at the plant
Calculation method Measured from the log sheets available at
plant
Year EF, y
MWh
1, January 2006 – 31, January 2007 39224
Refer to Table 8.11

Appendix 3
Name of item EF,y - Ex-ante option for OM calculations

Description Emission Factor, CO2 Emission factor for
Southern Regional Grid
Value in period 0.996 tCO2/MWh
Background data CEA general review
Calculation method Calculated from CEA general review
Year EF,y
tCO2/MWh
1, January 2006 – 31, January 2007 0.996
Refer Tables 8.1 -8.6 for calculations

Appendix 4
Name of item EFOM,y

Description Emission Factor, CO2 Operating Margin
Emission factor for Southern Regional
Grid
Year EF,OMy
tCO2/MWh
1st January 2006 – 31st January 2007 1.261; Ex-ante
Refer Table 8.1-8.6 for calculations

Appendix 5
Name of item EFBM,y

Description Emission Factor, CO2 Build Margin
Emission factor for Southern Regional
Grid
Year EF,BM y
tCO2/MWh
1st January 2006 – 31st January 2007 0.733; Ex-ante
Refer to Tables 8.7 and 8.8 for calculations
Appendix 6
Name of item Fi,y

Description Amount of each fossil fuel consumed by
each power source
Value in period At Tables 8.2, 8.4, and 8.6 for the periods
2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04 (3rd
Column ). Example: 5,29,85,000 MT in
2003-04 for coal
Background document CEA general review

Calculation method Data extracted from CEA general review

Appendix 7
Name of item COEFi

Description Emission factor coefficient for each fuel
2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04.
Example: 1505.6 tCO2/103 tonnes in
2003-04 for coal
Background document IPCC Default
Calculation method Data from the IPPC source
Appendix 8
Name of item Genm,y

Description Electricity generation by each power
source
2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04.
Example: 98434600 MWh/yr in 2003-04
due to coal
Calculation method Data measured from CEA general review

Appendix 9
Name of item Sr No 8 in Table

Description Identification of plant source, Name of
source of power plant for OM
2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04.
Example: Coal is source of power plant
for OM in 2003-04
Calculation method Text
Appendix 10
Name of item Sr No 8 in Table
Description Identification of plant source, Name of
source of power plant for BM
Value in period At Tables 8.8 for the periods 2003-04
Example: Neyveli FST is a power
plant(steam)
Calculation method Text

Appendix 11
Name of item GEN import

Description Electrical Quantity
Value in period 119835223 KWh
Calculation method Calculated based on CEA general review
Appendix 12
Name of item COEFi, imports

Description CO2 Emission factor in the connected grid
Value in period 1505.6 tCO2/103 tonnes in the year 2003-
04
Background document IPCC Default
Calculation method Data from the IPPC source

Appendix 13
Bagasse Balance
Statement showing Mass balance of Fuel for the period 1, Jan 06 – 31, Jan 07)
1) Own Bagasse generated 438721.11 – 4387.211 (1% to Oliver)

= 434333.89 MT
2) Bagasse Purchased 21012.9 MT
3) Steam generated from 4 HP 894633.84 MT
Boilers
4) Bagasse consumed by 4 HP 894633.84 /2 (where 2 is Steam fuel ratio)
Boilers = 447316.79 MT
5) Steam generated by 50 TPH 24186.41 MT
Boiler
a) Rectified Spirit 3998732*3.5 (3.5 kg of steam require to produce 1lit RS)
=13995562 kg = 13995.56 MT
b) Neutralized Spirit 1682321.1*6.0 (6.0 kg steam require to produce 1 lit NS)
=10093926.60 kg = 10093.93 MT
c) Ethanol 437634.8*4.5 (4.5 kg steam is require to produce 1lit Ethanol)
=1969356.60 kg = 1969.36 MT
Total A+b+c
26058.85=*1.05 = 27361.79 (5% losses added)
6) Bagasse consumed by 50 TPH 27361.79/1.6 (where 1.6 is steam fuel ratio)
Boiler =17101.12 MT
Bagasse Used in 4
Boilers (OB1i)
Own 447316.79 MT Bagasse required for 4
Bagasse Boilers
(OBi) (BBi)
434333.89 MT 447316.79 MT
Excess Bagasse
(OB2i)
-12982.9 MT
Inventory
IBi= OB2i+BS(i-1)
6806.34 MT Bagasse required for

50 TPH Boiler T(Bi)
17101.12 MT
Previous Stock in
inventory (BS(i-
1))
19789.24 MT
Purchased Bagasse
(PBi) used in 50
USWL Monitoring Report 51 TPH Boiler
17101.12 MT
Balance:
Own Bagasse + Purchased Bagasse + Inventory from Previous Year = Excess

Bagasse(from own bagasse after used for 4Hp Boilers) + Inventory carried to next year +
Bagasse consumed by 4 HP Boilers + Bagasse consumed by 50 TPH Boiler
434333.89 + 21012.9 + 19789.24 = -12982.9 + 17316 + 447316.79 + 17101.12

475136.03 ≈ 468751.01 (1.34%)

Monitoring Report: UNFCCC NO. 0189

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Monitoring Report: UNFCCC NO. 0189

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

MONITORING REPORT

Grid connected Bagasse based Cogeneration project of

for the period

Jan 1, 2006 - January 31, 2007

UNFCCC NO. 0189

1.0 Title of the project activity 6

1.1 Title of the CDM project 6

4.0 Definitions in the report 6

5.0 General description of the project 7

6.0 Monitoring methodology and plan 8

6.1 Data for monitoring the GHG reduction 8

7.0 Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) 15

7.1 Quality Management System 15

2.3 Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA)

8.0 GHG Calculations 18

8.1 GHG emission reductions – confirming to the

9.0 Bagasse and Steam balance check for Baseline requirement 40

Figure 5.1 Project Boundary 8

Figure 8.1 Bagasse balance at USWL 42

Figure 8.2 Steam balance at USWL 42

1.0 Title of the project activity

The project is categorised in sectoral scope 1: “Energy Industries (renewable / non-

4.0 Definitions in the report

PDD: Project Design Document

GHG: Greenhouse Gases

5.0 General description of the project

5.1 Project Activity

5.2 Technical description of the project

Location of the project activity

Technology employed by the project activity

• Switch yard (two numbers of 16.4/20 MVA ONAN/ONAF 11 KV/110 KV step

Figure 5.1: Project Boundary

SNM1 Siemens SNM2

6.0 Monitoring methodology and plan

Approved monitoring methodology AM0015 – “Bagasse – based cogeneration

6.1 Data for monitoring the GHG reduction

In keeping with the Monitoring Methodology, the following parameters are to be

• Data needed to calculate baseline emissions due displacement of thermal energy at

15 FFi,y Physical - Mass m yearly 100% Electronically The data, if any,

USWL Monitoring Report 11

USWL Monitoring Report 12

factor, Electricity Calculations, by the CEA, will be

USWL Monitoring Report 13

USWL Monitoring Report 14

8 Identification CEA text e Yearly 100% electronically The relevant Data

USWL Monitoring Report 15

USWL Monitoring Report 16

7.0 Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA)

7.1 Quality Management System

In USWL, the QA & QC procedures are equivalent to applicable International Standards

1. Secure a good consistency through planning to implementation of this CDM project

USWL Monitoring Report 17

7.3 Calibration/Maintenance of Measuring and Analytical Instruments

7.4 Environmental Impacts Due to the Project Activity; Present Status

USWL Monitoring Report 18

There are no transboundary impacts.

8.0 GHG Calculations

8.1 GHG emission reduction, confirming to the approved methodology of AM0015)

USWL Monitoring Report 19

ER y is the emission reductions of the project activity during year y in t CO2

BEelectricity, y = EG, y × EFelectricity, y

The emission factor EF y (= EFelectricity, y) of the grid is represented as a combination of

,in terms of EF OM, y and EF BM, y , is given by: