Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 43

1

Chapter I

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction
Everyone in the community has the right to adequate food. Aside from

human's health, good nutrition is important in the economic and social

development within the country. Nutrition is primary important throughout a

person’s life. It is interrelated to many other basic needs. It is reflected not only

for the physical state of an individual, but also in the personal attitude towards

life.

According to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2010) one of the rich

sources of nutrients is those from vegetables and crops. The huge farming of

plants to produce yields and provide products as potential resource for industries

is a necessity. The state of the art of crop farming alters generally in its capacity

ranging from largely managed limited plots to commercialize farms over

thousands of acres.

The Philippines, primarily an agricultural country, with insular

geographical location and ideal tropical climate is blessed with vegetables and

crops such as ampalaya and carrots. These vegetables and crops are known to

be good sources of nutrients.

According to PhilippineHerbalMedicine.org (2016) it also contains high

levels of vitamins A, B and C. In addition, bitter melon and carrots have been
2

used as medicinal herb for many centuries in Asian countries like China, India

and the Philippines. It is found in tropical and subtropical areas.

Dumplings are well-loved, bite-sized treats that have dozens of variations

around the world. You will most likely see them in Asian cuisine, especially as

Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Korean staples. For example, dumplings

are part and parcel of a traditional Chinese dim sum menu, and serve as a

common appetizer or side dish in Japanese menus.

The researcher found interest to develop and evaluated the acceptability

of fortified dumpling wrapper in different treatment such as dumpling wrapper

with ampalaya, dumpling wrapper with carrots. Pertaining to the demographic

profile of the respondents’ acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper and

the significant among the levels of acceptability of fortified dumpling wrapper in

different variants in terms of category characteristics.


3

Background of the study

The food industry is one of the top growing industries of today’s world.

Philippines as a source of quality food products derived from fresh, healthy, and

natural ingredients. In this generation, Filipino tend to discover or invent a more

cuisine. Filipino always use a common egg wrapper or flour wrapper. Wrapper

generally refers to a type of packaging, such as a flat sheet made out of flour,

water and salt to enclose an object.

Today’s living; we use generally two types of wrapper that is made out of

egg and flour. So we conducted this research to develop more choices on the top

of the two types that other people commonly used. We came up with an idea to

use common food wrapper mixed a vegetables.

Li et al. (2012) had studied on the relationship between sensory quality

and texture quality of dumpling wrappers. The results showed that the texture

and quality of fresh dumpling wrappers could be reflected by texture testing

indexes such as Cohesiveness,

It is one of the main reasons why the researcher wants to innovate the

dumpling wrapper to make it more nutritious and essential food for the people.

Vegetable are relevant for us people today. As we all see, many people

use wrappers in wrapping a food. So we improvise the wrapper and make it as a

healthy one. Wrappers with vegetables are healthier than the old one. We

choose Carrot and ampalaya vegetable because of the benefits that a person

might get in these vegetables. Nowadays people would choose an artificially


4

made food product that has less healthy nutritional content over the conventional

foods that is said to be “Good for our health” that is available in the market.

Ampalaya decreases the risk of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. The

benefits of Ampalaya are:Protection from radiation therapy, Cancer prevention,

Heart health, and Immunity and digestion. Cabbage is an excellent source of

natural antioxidant, vitamin C. Provides 36.6 mg or about 61% of RDA per 100 g.

It is also rich in essential vitamins such as pantothenic acid (vitamin B-5),

pyridoxine (vitamin B-6) and thiamin (vitamin B-1). It also contains a adequate

amount of minerals like potassium, manganese, iron, and magnesium.

Potassium is an important component of cell and body fluids that helps

controlling heart rate and blood pressure. Manganese is used by the body as a

co-factor for the antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase. Iron is required for

the red blood cell formation. Cabbage is a very good source of vitamin K,

provides about 63% of RDA levels. Vitamin K has the potential role in bone

metabolism through promoting osteotrophic activity. It is also enough in the diet

that would give you healthy bones.

We choose carrot because of the benefits that a person might get and a

turnip for a little sweetness of that wrapper. Traditionally, food wrappers are filled

with cooked rice or rice noodles, which help to make the meal more substantial.

Instead of using rice noodles, which are higher in calories despite being low-fat,

consider filling your wrapper with vegetables. These vegetables provide fiber and

nutrients and are low in calories. A diet high in fiber can help you lose weight by
5

making you feel fuller with fewer calories consumed and also it help you to lose

weight.

Literature review

This will help the readers and the future researchers of the same study to

improve and develop to have a better understanding of the study.

Based on Kumar, et.al., 2010, the leaf tea and/or fruit juice of

Momordica charantia is employed for sores and wounds, infections, worms

and parasites, as an emmenogogue, and for measles, hepatitis, fevers,

diabetes, colic and malaria. Momordica charantia has shown good larvicidal

activity against three container breeding mosquitoes

According to Olasehinde GI, et.al.(2014), natural products isolated from

plants used in traditional medicine, which have potent anti-plasmodial action in

vitro, represent potential sources of new anti-malarial drugs. The research

study presented sensitivity of 100 Plasmodium falciparum isolates to

chloroquine, quinine, amodiaquine, mefloquine, sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine,

artemisinin, Momordica charantia ('Ejirin') Diospyrosmonbuttensis ('Eguneja')

and Morindalucida ('Oruwo') .

In a separate study by Singh, et.al.(2016) , Momordica charantia has

shown good larvicidal activity against three container breeding mosquitoes—

An. stephensi, Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti in laboratory

experiments. Toxicological studies have shown that Momordica charantia is


6

safe for human health and there is no toxic effect18,22,23 . Momordica

charantia is used as a vegetable for human consumption. Hence the larvicidal

action of the fruits extract of Momordica charantia could be exploited for use in

potable waters against mosquito larvae.

According to Batugal, et. al., (2015), Momordica charantia is used to

treat arthritis, asthma and malaria together with Makahiya and Avocado.

The results of a separate study conducted by Lim et.al. (2010)

compared the effects Momordica charantia tablets at different doses versus

placebo on the early and extended profiles of mealtime insulin secretion in

individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as the associated effects on

the glycemic response to a meal

Dr. Lydia Marero of Food and Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI) of the

Department of Science and Technology (DOST) stated that carrots are

credited with many natural medicine properties; they are said to cleanse the

intestines and to be diuretic, remineralizing, antidiarrheal and overall tonic and

antianemic. Carrot is rich in alkaline elements which purify and revitalize the

blood.”

She added that carrot also nourish the entire system and help in the

maintenance of acid-alkaline balance in the body. The carrot also has a

reputation as a vegetable that helps to maintain good eyesight. It is a rich


7

source of carotenoids, chemicals found in plants which is now being studied

for their cancer-fighting activity.

Based on the study of Roberto B. Barba jr.and Rubetr P. Tabilaso as of

2014 ampalaya, amargoso or bitter gourd one of the most important commercial

and backyard vegetables widely ground and its edible fruit in Philippines the

bitter taste of ampalaya is popular. The bitter gourd is very nutritionally and rich

in vitamins and has an excellent source of iron and calcium.

Hammersh et al., (2010) explained the important benefit of carrot roots is

their high carotenoid content, and particularly betacarotene, a precursor of

vitamin Aretinol, involved in the eye function, reproduction,growth and the

maintenance of skin and mucous membranes. Carotenecontent depends on the

carrot variety orange types contain mostly A and Bcarotene but purple, red

and yellow carrots have different carotenoid composition .

. Raw orange carrots contain 200-1000 mg/kg of betacaroteneances 2016. B

etacarotene is located in the chromoplasts as crystals and stabilize by

lipoproteins, and its stability is rather highFrias et al., (2010).

Lyon and Lyon, (2012) mentioned that the sensory attributes, such as

appearance, odor, flavor, taste, and texture of foods detectable by human

senses, are often used to evaluate food quality. These characteristics may also

serve as references during the selection of foods.


8

Walker (2014) explained that the tongue recognizes five basic tastes:

sweet, salty, sour, and bitter and umami. Umami the latest addition to the four

basic tastes, is a savory aspect associated with meat and mushrooms. In recent

years, a growing no.of studies have shown that the taste can be influenced by a

host of surprising factors such as age. According to her, taste discrimination

tends to decrease with increasing age.

According to Szczesniak (2002),that the Texture, defined as “a sensory

and functional manifestation of the structural, mechanical and surface properties

of foods detected through the senses of vision, hearing, touch and kinesthetic”

comprises complicated characteristics that can be sensed and evaluated though

human senses.

Costell (2010) opened that consumer responses to food are not only base

on the sensory characteristics of the product and on their physiological status but

they are also related to other factors, such as previous information acquired

about the product, their past experience, and their attitudes and beliefs.

Theoretical Framework

This theory supports the evaluation process undertaken by the

researcher to gauge perception from the data gathered on the professional and

non-professional to substantially evaluate problems and solutions.

Sensory Evaluation of Food: Theory and Practice by Gisela Jellinek

(2012). When evaluating the sensory attributes of products, people, whether

consumers or sensory panelists, respond based on their perceptions. However,


9

some characteristics, such as color and texture, can also be quantitatively

measured using instruments. Instead of measuring sensory characteristics

directly, instruments measure the physicochemical properties of samples that

provides stimuli to human senses. By using sensory analysis, producers can

identify and respond to consumer preferences more efficiently, thus increasing

their competitiveness.

Sensory evaluation is a scientific discipline that analyses and measures

human responses to the composition of food and drink, e.g. appearance, touch,

odor, texture, temperature and taste. In schools it provides an ideal opportunity

for students to evaluate and give feedback on their dishes, test products and

experimental designs.

The precise way, in which sensory evaluation is conducted, along with the

different tests and sensory language used, need to be taught. This would help

students to understand the process and develop their sensory vocabulary. It also

means that students will record and generate evaluative feedback to support

their work.

Conceptual Framework

With the forgoing back ground the researcher paradigm composed of

three boxes showing the Input, Process and Output. The first box shows the

input composed of tools, equipment, ingredients, procedures and references

needed. The second box at the right shows the process composed of different

procedures in making Development and Acceptability of fortified Dumpling


10

Wrapper. The third box shows the output composed of the scorecard in

evaluating the Development and acceptability of fortified dumpling wrapper

Input Process Output


t

Acceptability of

Fortified dumpling Processing Fortified dumpling


Wrapper All wrapper
ingredients Cooking
Equipment/tools
Details/Procedure

Figure 1. Paradigm of the study


11

Statement of the Problem

This study aimed to develop and determine the level of acceptability of

fortified dumpling wrapper.

Specifically the researcher seeks to answer the following questions:

1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:

1.1 Age

1.2 Gender

1.3 Educational Attainment

2. What is the acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

ampalaya and carrots in terms of:

2.1 Color

2.2 Aroma

2.3 Texture

2.4 Taste

2.5 General acceptability

3. Is there a significant relationship between the profile of the respondents

and the level of acceptability of dumpling wrapper using different

treatment?

4. Is there a significant difference between the levels of acceptability of

dumpling wrapper using different treatments when classified according to

the profile?
12

5. Is there a significant difference between the levels of acceptability among

the different treatments?

Hypothesis of the study

 There is no significant relationship between the profile of the respondents

and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using different

treatment.

 There is no significant difference between the levels of acceptability of

Dumpling Wrapper using different treatments when classified according to

the profile.

 There is no significant difference between the levels of acceptability

among the different treatments.

Significance of the study

This study was conducted to provide some information that can benefit the

following stakeholders:

To Students-The result of this study would serve as a springboard in exploring

other local materials in making dumpling wrapper.

To Street food vendor-They would also benefit from the study as this could help

them in adding new ideas in their business using the product studied

To Researchers -This study may give idea or serve as a starting point in

pursuing more researches.


13

To Prospective Entrepreneurs-They would gain new ideas and knowledge to

produce new products and to encourage them to enter in this kind of business.

To Food Industry-This study would manufacture a product which will economize

the budget of the customers and develop a healthy lifestyle among others.

To Community-This study would help the community to have a healthy living

and added source of income with a minimal capital for those who are willing to

start a business

Scope and Limitations of the Study

The study evaluated the development and acceptability of fortified

dumpling wrapper with different treatment using ampalaya and carrots including

sensory qualities such as color, aroma, texture, taste and general acceptability.

The study utilized experiment in the development of the products and evaluating

the acceptability of fortified dumpling wrapper with different treatment. The study

conducted at Siniloan, Laguna consisting of streets food vendors served as

respondents. The researchers conducted the said study among 100 active

vendors in Siniloan Laguna. This will also include the food preservation which is

the process treating and handling food to stop or slow down food spoilage, loos

of quality, edibility or nutritional value and thus allow for longer food storage.

Definition of Terms

For better and clearer understanding of this study the following terms were

operationally defined.
14

Acceptability. This is something that is considered to be socially ok or within the

realm of what is appropriate, or something that is tolerable but not necessarily

desired.

Aroma. The quality of principle of plants or others, substances which constitutes

to its fragrance: agreeable and distinctive odor.

Color. The visual perceptual property corresponding in humans to the

categories called red, green, blue and others.

Dumplings are cooked balls of dough. They are based on flour, potatoes or

bread, and may include meat, fish, vegetables, or sweets.

Evaluation. Is the systematic collection and analysis of data needed to make

decisions, a process in which most well-run programs engage from the outset.

Texture. The feel, appearance, or consistency of a surface or a substance


15

Chapter 2

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presented the methods used in the conduct of the study,

determination of the research design, subject of the study, sampling technique,

materials, tools and equipment’s, special technique and procedure gantt chart,

budgetary requirements, data gathering procedures, data processing and

statistical analysis

Research Design

The study utilized the experimental design, using descriptive and

statistical treatment in processing of data. This method is applied to find out the

strength of the ampalaya and carrot that produced a dumpling wrapper with a

better quality along with such aspect as taste, texture, color, aroma and general

acceptability of the product to the public. The experiment covered a period of one

month which started from February to March, 2018. This study consisted of the

basic recipe of wonton wrapper using all-purpose flour, ampalaya and carrot.

CALMORIN (2004) defined the experimental method as method which is

conducted to find new facts and to verify the results of previous experiments. The

research is subjected for evaluation in terms of color, taste, aroma, flavor texture

and general acceptability.


16

Subject and Sampling Techniques

The researcher made use of purposive sampling method in finding

participants of the study. Sample of the products was conducted from street food

vendors of Siniloan, Laguna appropriate containers for tasting. For the taste

panelist, quota sampling technique would be used. A total of 100 respondents

Data Gathering Instrument

To attain the objectives of this study an interview would be conducted with

self-formulated question as a guide to gathered the necessary information

needed in the study, the question were dividing into several parts such as:

demographic profile of the respondents and the level to the acceptability of the

fortified dumpling. The researcher decided to use one set of sensory evaluation

as tool to gather information and feedback from respondents. The said

instrument was divided into two parts; the first part is the personal information of

the respondents. The second part is consist of Fortified dumpling wrapper using

different treatment in terms of taste, color, aroma, texture, and general

acceptability that measure its acceptability by putting a check mark on the

appropriate variants describes as follows:


17

Scale Range Descriptive

5 4.21-5 Very much acceptable

4 3.41-4.20 Moderately acceptable

3 2.61-3.40 Acceptable

2 1.81-2 Least acceptable

1 1-1.80 Not acceptable

Data Gathering Procedure

The researcher understood several steps which led to the completion of

the study. First the researcher formulated the research title and let it approve by

his adviser. Second the researcher prepared the research instrument which is

self-made questionnaire measure the level to the acceptability of the fortified

dumpling wrapper. Third the researcher decided to get the sample of the

respondents and started to administer score and interpret the test.

Statistical treatment

The data gathered from the results of the sensory evaluation as perceived

from the panelists were treated statistically using Frequency, Percentage,

Weighted Mean, in order to determine the mean scores from the formulations.

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant mean

differences between each formulation subjected to P- value and F- critical value.


18

Variables Statistical tool

1. Demographic profile of the Frequency, Percentage and rank


respondents in terms of:
1.1. Age
1.2. Gender
1.3. Educational Attainment

2. Level of acceptability of fortified Weighted mean, Verbal interpretation


dumpling wrapper in terms of: and rank
2.1. Color
2.2. Aroma
2.3. Texture
2.4. Taste
2.5. General acceptability
3. significant relationship between the Chi Square
profile of the respondents and the
level of acceptability of Dumpling
Wrapper using different treatment
4. significant difference between the
levels of acceptability of Dumpling Mann Whitney U test
Wrapper using different treatments
when classified according to the
profile
5. significant difference between the Mann Whitney U test
levels of acceptability among the
different treatments
19

GANTT chart

The Conduct of the study would be carried out according to the Gantt chart show

below:

2017 2018

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Preparation
for title
proposal
Title defense

Creating
Chapter 1
Research for
the literature
review
Creating the
Chapter 2
Chapter 1 and
2 colloquium
Conduct of
research
Chapter 3 and
4
Research
Chapter 3 and
4 final Oral
Defense

Manuscripts
20

Special Techniques and Procedures

Collection of raw

The fresh ampalaya and carrots was obtained directly in Siniloan

market; dumpling production center located in Brgy. KapatalanSiniloan, Laguna.

Ingredients of dumpling with

ampalaya
Ingredients of dumpling with carrots

1/8 cup of fresh ampalaya


1/8 cup of carrots

1 tsp. salt
1 tsp salt

½ cup water
½ cup water

2 cup all purpose flour


2 cup all-purpose four

2/3 cup of cornstarch


2/3 cup of cornstarch
21

Preparation of Dumpling with Ampalaya

Prepare the entire ingredients grate the ampalaya using a grater, salt,

water, all purpose flour and cornstarch. In a large bowl put the flour, water, salt

and the ampalaya stir until well mixed and then get the dough put in the clean

plastic bag and set aside for 10 minutes After that use the rolling pin till it gets

thinner

Preparing of dumpling with carrots

Prepare the entire ingredients grate the carrots using a grater, salt, water,

all-purpose flour and cornstarch. In a large bowl put the flour, water, salt and the

carrots stir until well mixed and then get the dough put in the clean plastic bag

and set aside for 10 minutes after that use the rolling pin till it gets thinner.

Budgetary Requirements

The cost of production would be computed based on the actual cost of

materials.

Particular Cost

Tranportation 200.00

Cost of ingredients 500.00

Cost of materials in comp. shop 350.00

Total cost 1050.00


22

FLOW CHART

Preparation of materials ingredients

Washing and cleaning of ingredients

Mixing fo all the ingredients

Kneading of dough

Resting and flatting of dough

Packing the product


23

Chapter 3

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter discussed the findings obtained from the primary instrument

used in the study. It shall be discussing the characteristics of the respondents,

present and analyze the gathered data for Development and Acceptability of

Fortified dumpling wrapper in order to simplify the discussion, the researcher

provided tabulation of data that summarize the collective data gathered provided

by outline in the statement of the study.

Profile of the respondents

Table 1 shows the frequency, percentage and rank distribution of the

profile of the respondents. The perceiving table shows the highest frequency of

sex, male has frequency of 58 which is rank 1, Followed by the female with a

frequency of 42 with have 42% were the rank 2,

In terms of Civil status majority of the respondents were married with a

frequency of 69 which have 69.00% were the rank 1, followed by the

respondents who were single with a frequency of 16 with a16.00% were the rank

2, Next is respondents who were widow with a frequency of 10 with a percentage

of 10.00.Laslty who were separated with a frequency of 5 with a 5% were the

rank 4

In terms of Educational Attainment, majority of the respondents were

collage undergrad with a frequency of 63 with a 63.%, followed by respondents


24

who were High school undergraduate with a frequency of 16 with 16% were

the rank 2.,

Next were the respondents who were Elementary Undergrad/ High school

Graduate with a frequency of 8 with 8.% and lastly respondents were belong to

College Graduate with a frequency of 2 with 2.% were the last rank.

It also indicated that majority of the respondents were male vendors rather

than female vendors, it also implies that they were married and belong to the

college undergraduate.

However, FAO (2012) mentioned that the majority of the vendors were

male, which is inconsistent with the predominance of studies around the world

finding street vendors to be predominantly women.

Table 1 Demographic profile of the respondents

Profile Frequency Percentage Rank


Sex
Female 42 42.00 2
Male 58 58.00 1
Total 100 100.00
Civil Status
Married 69 69.00 1
Single 16 16.00 2
Separated 5 5.00 4
Widow 10 10.00 3
Total 100 100.00
Highesteducationalattainment
College Graduate 2 2.00 5
Collage Undergrad 63 63.00 1
Elementary Graduate 3 3.00 4
Elementary Undergrad 8 8.00 3.5
High school Graduate 8 8.00 3.5
High school undergraduate 16 16.00 2
Total 100 100.00
25

Table 2. Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya in


terms of taste

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1. The dumpling 1.76 Not acceptable 3
has bitter taste.
2. The dumpling 1.69 Not acceptable 4
has rancid aroma
3. the dumpling 2.47 Acceptable 2
has salty taste
4. The dumpling 3.68 Moderately 1
has after taste acceptable
5. General 4.27 Very much
Acceptability acceptable

Table 2 presents the Acceptability level of fortified. Overall result the

General Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of

“Very much acceptable”. Next is The dumpling has after taste wrapper using

ampalaya in terms of taste. It shows that the “dumpling has after taste” was

moderately acceptable by the respondents with a weighted mean of 3.68. Next

the dumpling has salty taste with a weighted mean of 2.47 with a verbal

interpretation of acceptable. Next in rank is the dumpling has bitter taste with a

weighted mean of 1.76 with a verbal interpretation of acceptable. Last is the

dumpling has rancid aroma with a weighted mean of 1.69

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya was

accepted by the respondents.


26

Table 3. . Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya


in terms of color

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1.The dumpling 1.84 Least acceptable 4
has light-green
color
2. The dumpling 1.47 Not acceptable 3
has light-brown
color
3. The dumpling 2.13 Least acceptable 2
has creamy-white
color
4. The dumpling 3.78 Acceptable 1
has white color
5. General 4.27 Very much
acceptability acceptable

Table 3 presents the Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

ampalaya in terms of color. Overall result the General Acceptability with a

weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.

Next is It shows that the dumpling has white color” was moderately acceptable by

the respondents with a weighted mean of 3.78. Next the dumpling has creamy-

white color with a weighted mean of 2.13 with a verbal interpretation of Least

acceptable. Next in rank is the dumpling has light-brown with a weighted mean of

1.84 with a verbal interpretation of Least acceptable. Last is the dumpling has

light-green with a weighted mean of 1.84

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya was

accepted by the respondents.


27

Table 4. . Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya


in terms of aroma

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1.The dumpling 4.26 Very much 2
has pungent acceptable
aroma
2. The dumpling 1.87 Least acceptable 5
has rancid aroma
3. The dumpling 2.6 Acceptable 3
has appetizing
aroma
4. The dumpling is 2.74 Acceptable 4
odorless
5. General 4.27 Very much 1
acceptability acceptable

Table 4 presents the Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

ampalaya in terms of taste. Overall result the General Acceptability with a

weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much acceptable”..

Next is that the “dumpling is odorless” was acceptable by the respondents with a

weighted mean of 2.74. Next the dumpling has appetizing aroma with a weighted

mean of 2.6 with a verbal interpretation of acceptable. Next in rank is the

dumpling has rancid aroma with a weighted mean of 1.87 with a verbal

interpretation of least acceptable. Last is the dumpling has pungent aroma with a

weighted mean of 4.26

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya was

accepted by the respondents.


28

Table 5. . Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya


in terms of texture

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1.Thedumpling has 4.45 Very much 1
soft texture acceptable
2. The dumpling 1.94 Least acceptable 5
has hard texture
3. The dumpling 2.39 Least acceptable 3
has lumpy texture
4. the dumpling 2 Least acceptable 4
has mushy texture
5. General 4.17 Very much 2
acceptability acceptable

Table 5 presents the Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

ampalaya in terms of taste. Overall result the General Acceptability with a

weighted mean of 4.17 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much

acceptable”..Mext is that the “dumpling has mushy texture” was Least acceptable

by the respondents with a weighted mean of 2. Next the dumpling has lumpy

texture with a weighted mean of 2.39 with a verbal interpretation of Least

acceptable. Next in rank is the dumpling has hard texture with a weighted mean

of 2.39 with a verbal interpretation of Least acceptable. Last is the dumpling has

soft texture with a weighted mean of 4.45

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalaya was

accepted by the respondents.


29

Table 6. . Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using carrots in


terms of taste

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1. The dumpling 1.28 Not acceptable 5
has bitter taste.
2. The dumpling 1.49 Not acceptable 4
has spicy taste
3. the dumpling 2.37 Least acceptable 3
has salty taste
4. The dumpling 3.57 Acceptable 2
has after taste
5. General 4.19 Very much 1
Acceptability acceptable

Table 6 presents the Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

Carrots in terms of taste. Overall result the General Acceptability with a weighted

mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.. Next is that

the “dumpling has after taste” was acceptable by the respondents with a

weighted mean of 3.57. Next the dumpling has salty taste with a weighted mean

of 2.37 with a verbal interpretation of Least acceptable. Next in rank is the

dumpling has spicy taste with a weighted mean of 1.49 with a verbal

interpretation of Not acceptable. Last is the dumpling has bitter taste with a

weighted mean of 1.28

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalayawas

accepted by the respondents.


30

Table 7. Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using carrots in


terms of color

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1.The dumpling 1.23 Not acceptable 4
has light-green
color
2. The dumpling 1.75 Not acceptable 5
has light-brown
color
3. The dumpling 2.21 Least acceptable 3
has creamy-white
color
4. The dumpling 3.91 Moderately 2
has white color acceptable
5. General 4.3 Very much 1
acceptability acceptable

Table 7 presents the Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

Carrots in terms of taste. Overall result the General Acceptability with a weighted

mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.. Next is that

the “dumpling has white color” was moderately acceptable by the respondents

with a weighted mean of 3.91. Next the dumpling has creamy white color with a

weighted mean of 2.21 with a verbal interpretation of Least acceptable. Next in

rank is the dumpling has light brown color with a weighted mean of 1.75 with a

verbal interpretation of not acceptable. Last is the dumpling has light green with a

weighted mean of 1.23

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using ampalayawas

accepted by the respondents.


31

Table 8. Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using carrots in


terms of aroma

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1.The dumpling 4.08 Very much 2
has pungent acceptable
aroma
2. The dumpling 1.7 Not acceptable 5
has rancid aroma
3. The dumpling 2.5 Least acceptable 4
has appetizing
aroma
4. The dumpling is 2.29 Least acceptable 3
odorless
5. General 4.31 Very much 1
acceptability acceptable

Table 8 presents the Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

Carrots in terms of taste. Overall result the General Acceptability with a weighted

mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.. Next is that

the “dumpling is odorless” was Least acceptable by the respondents with a

weighted mean of 2.29. Next the dumpling has appetizing aroma with a weighted

mean of 1.7 with a verbal interpretation of Not acceptable. Next in rank is the

dumpling has rancid aroma with a weighted mean of 1.7 with a verbal

interpretation of not acceptable. Last is the dumpling has pungent aroma with a

weighted mean of 4.08

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using carrots was accepted

by the respondents.
32

Table 9. Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using carrots in


terms of texture

Indicators Weighted mean Verbal Rank


interpretation
1.Thedumpling has 4.38 Very much 1
soft texture acceptable
2. The dumpling 1.78 Least acceptable 5
has hard texture
3. The dumpling 2.37 Acceptable 3
has lumpy texture
4. the dumpling 2.44 Least acceptable 4
has mushy texture
5. General 4.17 Moderately 2
acceptability acceptable

Table 9 presents the Acceptability level of fortified the dumpling wrapper

using Carrots in terms of taste. Overall result the General Acceptability with a

weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very much

acceptable”.Next is that the “dumpling has mushy texture” was Least acceptable

by the respondents with a weighted mean of 2.44. Next the dumpling has lumpy

texture with a weighted mean of 2.44 with a verbal interpretation of acceptable.

Next in rank is the dumpling has hard texture with a weighted mean of 1.78 with

a verbal interpretation of Least acceptable. Last is the dumpling has soft texture

with a weighted mean of 4.38

It revealed that the fortified dumpling wrapper using carrots was accepted

by the respondents.
33

Test of relationship between the profile of the respondents and the level of

acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using different treatment

Table 3 shown the relationship between the profile of the respondents and

the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using different treatment. It

revealed that Dumpling wrapper with ampalaya (bitter gourd) for the profile

respondents, Taste the sex has a P-value of 0.539, civil status of 0.388,

educational attainment of 0.428with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the

profile of the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper

using different treatment.

Color the sex has a P-value of 0.568. Civil status of 0.000, educational

attainment of0.266, with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the profile of

the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using

different treatment.

Aroma the sex has a P-value of 0.632. civil status of 0.187, educational

attainment of 0.994, with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the profile of

the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using

different treatment.

Texture the sex has a P-value of 0.228. civil status of 0.867, educational

attainment of 0.488, with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the profile of

the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using

different treatment.
34

This implies that the Dumpling Wrapper using different treatment is

accepted by the respondents. Furthermore, the study concluded that there are no

significant differences in sensory characteristics.

It revealed that Dumpling wrapper with carrots (Daucuscarota subsp.

sativus)for the profile respondents, Taste the sex has a P-value of 0.568, civil

status of 0.021, educational attainment of 0.796with a verbal interpretation of not

significant in the profile of the respondents and the level of acceptability of

Dumpling Wrapper using different treatment.

Color the sex has a P-value of 0.624. Civil status of 0.936, educational

attainment of 0.228, with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the profile of

the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using

different treatment.

Aroma the sex has a P-value of 0.376. civil status of 0.404, educational

attainment of 0.719, with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the profile of

the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using

different treatment.

Texture the sex has a P-value of 0.578. civil status of 0.508, educational

attainment of 0.249, with a verbal interpretation of not significant in the profile of

the respondents and the level of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using

different treatment.
35

This implies that the Dumpling Wrapper using different treatment is

accepted by the respondents. Furthermore, the study concluded that there are no

significant differences in sensory characteristics.

Table 3.Test of relationship between the profile of the respondents and the level
of acceptability of Dumpling Wrapper using different treatments.

Indicators Treatments Profile P-Value Decision Interpretation


Sex 0.539 Accept Ho Not Significant
1
Civil Status 0.388 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.428 Accept Ho Not Significant
Taste
Sex 0.141 Accept Ho Not Significant
2
Civil Status 0.776 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.796 Accept Ho Not Significant
Sex 0.568 Accept Ho Not Significant
1
Civil Status 0.267 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.266 Accept Ho Not Significant
Color
Sex 0.624 Accept Ho Not Significant
2
Civil Status 0.936 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.228 Accept Ho Not Significant
Sex 0.632 Accept Ho Not Significant
1
Civil Status 0.187 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.994 Accept Ho Not Significant
Aroma
Sex 0.376 Accept Ho Not Significant
2
Civil Status 0.404 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.719 Accept Ho Not Significant
Sex 0.228 Accept Ho Not Significant
1
Civil Status 0.867 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.488 Accept Ho Not Significant
Texture
Sex 0.578 Accept Ho Not Significant
2
Civil Status 0.508 Accept Ho Not Significant
HEA 0.249 Accept Ho Not Significant
36

Table 4.Test of significant difference between the levels of acceptability of


dumpling wrapper using different treatments when classified according to the
profile.

Indicators Treatments Profile P-Value Decision Interpretation


Sex 0.412 Accept Ho Not Significant

1 Civil
0.633 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.682 Accept Ho Not Significant
Taste
Sex 0.127 Accept Ho Not Significant

2 Civil
0.081 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.815 Accept Ho Not Significant
Sex 0.494 Accept Ho Not Significant

1 Civil
0.419 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.758 Accept Ho Not Significant
Color
Sex 0.779 Accept Ho Not Significant

2 Civil
0.506 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.124 Accept Ho Not Significant
Sex 0.862 Accept Ho Not Significant

1 Civil
0.485 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.169 Accept Ho Not Significant
Aroma
Sex 0.491 Accept Ho Not Significant

2 Civil
0.824 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.416 Accept Ho Not Significant
Sex 0.097 Accept Ho Not Significant

1 Civil
0.816 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.982 Accept Ho Not Significant
Texture
Sex 0.919 Accept Ho Not Significant

2 Civil
0.334 Accept Ho Not Significant
Status
HEA 0.311 Accept Ho Not Significant
37

Significance difference between the levels of acceptability among the

different treatments

Table 5It Indicated that a one way analysis of variance test was utilized to

identify if significant statistical differences existed in the levels of acceptability

among the different treatments.LSD and Duncan tests were applied to detect if

significant statistical differences existed between the groups. The data indicates

that sensory Status by the respondents in terms of color and texture with a p-

value of 0.693 and 0.794 has no differences in the levels of acceptability among

the different treatments.

While that taste and aroma with a p-value of 0.002 and 0.003 has have

differences in the levels of acceptability among the different treatments.

Table 5.Test of significance difference between the levels of acceptability among


the different treatments.

Indicators Stat Tool P-Value Decision Interpretation


Highly
Taste 0.002 Reject Ho
Significant
Mann-
Color 0.693 Accept Ho Not Significant
Whitney U
Highly
Aroma Test 0.003 Reject Ho
Significant
Texture 0.794 Accept Ho Not Significant
38

CHAPTER 4

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

This chapter presents the summary of the research work undertaken, the

conclusion drawn and the recommendations made as an outgrowth of this study.

This study was about the Acceptability of Fortified Dumpling Wrapper in different

variants

The profiles of the respondents were age, sex, educational attainment,

religion, cooking ability and food preferences was undertaken.

Summary of findings

This study was conducted in the town of Siniloan, Laguna.100 respondents

such as Streets vendors were involved in this study.

Based on the data gathered majority of the respondents were male

vendors rather than female vendors, it also implies that were married and belong

to the college undergraduate.

Based on the result, Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using

ampalaya in terms of taste. It indicated that the “dumpling has after taste” was

moderately acceptable by the respondents with a weighted mean of 3.68. Overall

result the General Acceptability of taste with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a

verbal interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.

In terms of color “dumpling has white color” was moderately acceptable by

the respondents with a weighted mean of 3.78. Overall result the General
39

Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very

much acceptable

In term of Aroma It shows that the “dumpling is odorless” was acceptable

by the respondents with a weighted mean of 2.74. Overall result the General

Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very

much acceptable”.

In terms of texture It shows that the “dumpling has mushy texture” was

Least acceptable by the respondents with a weighted mean of 2. Over all result

the General Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.17 with a verbal

interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.

Results shows that Dumpling wrapper ampalaya has a potential market

and high satisfaction rating prospective

Acceptability level of fortified dumpling wrapper using Carrots in terms of

taste it indicated that the “dumpling has after taste” was acceptable by the

respondents with a weighted mean of 3.57.Overall result the General

Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of “Very

much acceptable

In term of color It shows that the “dumpling has white color” was

moderately acceptable by the respondents with a weighted mean of 3.91. Over

all result the General Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal

interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.


40

In term of Aroma It shows that the “dumpling is odorless” was Least

acceptable by the respondents with a weighted mean of 2.29Overall result the

General Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal interpretation of

“Very much acceptable”.

In term of texture It shows that the “dumpling has mushy texture” was

Least acceptable by the respondents with a weighted mean of 2.44. Over all

result the General Acceptability with a weighted mean of 4.27 with a verbal

interpretation of “Very much acceptable”.

Result shows that Dumpling wrapper a Carrot has a potential market and

high satisfaction rating prospective.

Based on the result, that majority of the respondents were accepted the

overall sensory qualities of the product. Overall average of the acceptability of

the product received a mean of 2.90 and verbally interpreted as acceptable. This

results shows that Dumpling wrapper ampalaya and carrots has a potential

market and high satisfaction rating prospective consumers.

Based on the data gathered that the Dumpling Wrapper using different

treatment is accepted by the respondents. Furthermore, the study findings that

there are no significant differences in sensory characteristics.

All variants got verbal interpretation of like extremely and the overall

computed P-value was greater than percent level of significance of 0.05. the

decision was not significant therefore the null hypothesis is accepted.


41

Conclusion

Variety of delicious menus could be made from Ampalaya (bitter gourd)

and carrots (Daucuscarota subsp. sativus). Among which the Dumpling wrapper

cooked with different treatment such as Dumpling wrapper Ampalaya (bitter

gourd) and Dumpling wrappe rcarrots (Daucuscarota subsp. sativus) . In

conclusion, Dumpling wrapper Ampalaya (bitter gourd) and Dumpling wrapper

carrots (Daucuscarota subsp. sativus) seems to be a suitable alternative for

wrapper in dissum and Dumpling for low capital production and have highly

nutritive content.

Furthermore, Dumpling wrapper can with different treatment such as

Dumpling wrapper Ampalaya (bitter gourd) and Dumpling wrapper carrots

(Daucuscarota subsp. sativus) resulted in not significant differences in its general

sensory acceptability and in terms of, taste, color and texture; hence the null

hypothesis was rejected. Dumpling wrapper cooked with different treatment such

as Dumpling wrapper Ampalaya (bitter gourd) and Dumpling wrapper

carrotsDaucuscarota subsp. sativus), very nutritious and is locally abundant,

should be maximized as a key ingredient. Since the use of amapalaya and

carrots in dumpling wrapper is proved to be very acceptable.


42

Recommendations

Based on the following findings, the study arrived at the following

recommendation.

 A further investigation to determine the shelf-life of the product is

recommended.

 The community will provide attention in farming ampalaya and

carrots and enhance gain new ideas and knowledge to produce

new products and to encourage them to enter in this kind of

business.

 The streets vendors will provide time and effort to acknowledge and

cultivate ampalaya and carrots as accepted dumpling wrapper and

will help the community to have a healthy living and added source of

income with a minimal capital for those who are willing to start a

business.
43

Bibliography

https://www.yummy.ph/lessons/prepping/kinds-of-dumpling-wrappers-how-to-
shop-grocery
Steinier(2012)Taste and flavor
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-
nutritionsociety/article/taste-and-flavour-their-importance-in-food-choice-
andacceptance/ECF4D52E9B714DC791163168DADCBEFB

Szczesniak (2012) AS. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual Prefer.


2002;13:215–225. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4478495/

Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Department of Science and Technology.


URL: http//www.fnri.dost.gov.ph a pink color (Lynch et al

Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Department of Science and Technology.


URL: http//www.fnri.dost.gov.ph

Sensory Evaluation of Food: Theory and Practice Ellis Horwood series in food
science and technology. Author, Gisela Jellinek.Edition, reprint.Publisher, VCH,
1985.Original from, Pennsylvania State University.Digitized, Feb 3, 2012. ISBN,
089573401X, 9780895734013. Length, 429 pages.

https://www.leaf.tv/articles/what-is-the-nutrition-in-ampalaya/

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi