Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

A List of Online Resources for Bayesian Inference with JASP

Note: almost all articles can be downloaded free of charge from Sci-Hub.cc.

1. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, A. J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q.
F., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D. (2016). Bayesian inference for
psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Manuscript submitted for
publication. OSF link with a JASP analysis of correlation: https://osf.io/m6bi8/.

2. Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). Default
"Gunel and Dickey" Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behavior Research Methods. Features JASP
analyses of contingency tables.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/inpress/JamilEtAlGunelDickeyinpress.pdf.

3. Scheibehenne, B., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). Bayesian evidence synthesis can
reconcile seemingly inconsistent results: The case of hotel towel reuse. Psychological Science. Features
JASP analyses of contingency tables: https://osf.io/tz6xv/.

4. Jamil, T., Marsman, M., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). What are the odds?
Modern relevance and Bayes factor solutions for MacAlister's problem from the 1881 Educational
Times. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Features JASP analyses of contingency tables:
https://osf.io/nvdqh/.

5. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, A. J., Swagman, A. R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press).
Bayesian analysis of factorial designs. Psychological Methods. Explains the BayesFactor ANOVA
method used by JASP. With examples.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/inpress/RouderEtAlinpressANOVAPM.pdf.

6. Ly, A., Verhagen, A. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor
hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology. Journal of Mathematical
Psychology, 72, 19-32. Discusses the foundations for the correlation and t-test implemented in JASP.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2016/LyEtAl2016JMP.pdf.

7. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Morey, R. D., & Lee, M. D. (2016). Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic
researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 169-176. Features a JASP example for the
sequential analysis of a correlation. https://osf.io/dpshk/.

8. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Verhagen, A. J., & Ly, A. (2016). How to quantify the evidence for the absence
of a correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 413-426. Applies the Bayesian correlation test in
JASP. http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2016/WagenmakersEtAl2016LonelyBathing.pdf.

9. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). The interplay between subjectivity,
statistical practice, and psychological science. Collabra, 2, 1-12. A paper about the foundations of
Bayesian inference. http://www.collabra.org/article/10.1525/collabra.28/.

10. Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). The fallacy of
placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 103-123.
https://learnbayes.org/papers/confidenceIntervalsFallacy/.
11. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, A. J., Province, J. M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Is there
a free lunch in inference? Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 520-547.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2016/RouderEtAl2016FreeLunch.pdf.

12. Boekel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Belay, L., Verhagen, A. J., Brown, S. D., & Forstmann, B. U.
(2015). A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations. Cortex, 66,
115-133. Uses the correlation test that is now implemented in JASP.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2015/BoekelEtAl2015.pdf.

13. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Beek, T., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Ly, A.,
Verhagen, A. J., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., Gronau, Q. F., Love, J., & Pinto, Y. (2015). Turning the hands
of time again: A purely confirmatory replication study and a Bayesian analysis. Frontiers in
Psychology: Cognition, 6:494. Uses the t-test from JASP.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2015/WagenmakersEtAlWheelofTime2015.pdf.

14. Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Koch, G., van Aalst, C., Pinto, Y., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H.,
Verhagen, J., Beek, T. F., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). On the automatic link
between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in
Psychology: Cognition, 6:335. Uses the t-test from JASP.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2015/RotteveelEtAl2015.pdf.

15. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011).
Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291-298. Not directly on JASP, but still relevant.
http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2011/WetzelsEtAl2011_855.pdf.

16. The Shiny app that was used is available on Shinyapps.org, or directly on
http://87.106.45.173:3838/felix/BayesLessons/BayesianLesson1.Rmd.

17. Berger, J. O., & Berry, D. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American
Scientist, 76, 159-165. http://www.jstor.org.sci-hub.cc/stable/27855070?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents