Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT # 02
COURSE: TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT (5575)
Level Executive MBA/MPA (3rd) Semester: SPRING 2010
Submitted to
MR.SALIM ADMED
Submitted By
Roll # AD514761
Cell# 0300-6719422
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank first of all my teacher Mr.Salim Ahmed for his kind
briefing regarding this Assignment.
5575
It is important to understand the definition of the term quality before discussing the total
quality management, which is a much more broader term.
Definition of Quality
There is no single definition of the term quality. Quality means different to different
people such as:
3. Product-Based: The product has something that other similar products do not that
adds value in other words quality refers to the amounts of the unpriced attributes
contained in each unit of the priced attribute
4. Value-Based: The product is the best combination of price and features or quality
means best for certain customer conditions. These conditions are (a) the actual use and
(b) the selling price of the product.”
5. Transcendent: It is not clear what it is, but it is something good or it may also be
defined as quality is neither mind nor matter, but a third entity independent of the
two…even through Quality cannot be defined, you know what it is.”
Therefore, TQM is the art of managing the whole to achieve the excellence.
TQM is defined as both philosophy and a set of guiding principles that represents the
foundation of a continuously improving organization.
It is the application of quantitative methods and human resources to improve all the
processes within an organization and exceed customer needs now and in future.
1. Introduction
The importance of a sound quality system within an organization has increased rapidly
in recent years. Many discussions on the subject focus on the concept of total quality
management (TQM) and TQM is the subject of a great many publications concerning
quality in general. However, the content of these articles and the accent they present,
differ to a considerable degree. Some emphasize for example the importance of
conformance to the requirements and demands of the customer, while others
emphasize the importance of management commitment.
Questions arising as a result of this situation are: What is the overall concept of TQM?
Is it possible to summarize it in a single definition? Is it a concept built up of a number of
basic elements?
A company which asked itself these questions and decided to look for answers
For this purpose. Section 2 places TQM in a historical perspective and provides a view
of the development of quality management from three different perspectives.
Subsequently, in Section 3, the TQM model comprising eight basic elements is
presented. Section 4 describes the operationalization of these generalized basic
elements of TQM towards more concrete concepts, methods and techniques. In Section
5, the concepts, methods and techniques are allocated to specific application areas
within an organization. Section 6 provides the closing of this initial article with a number
of conclusions.
2. Quality management in a historical perspective
The development of a systematic approach to quality management can be defined in
four stages:
(1) quality inspection (QI);
(2) quality assurance (QA);
(3) total quality control (TQC);
(4) total quality management (TQM).
In literature (e.g. Feigenbaum, 1983; Foster & Whittle, 1989) a number of characteristics
can be perceived for each phase, as shown in Table 1. In order to distinguish more
specific characteristics per phase, it was decided to analyse the various phases from
three perspectives (Bossink, 1991).
2.1. Utilization and technical perspective
This perspective centres on the degree to which an organization concentrates on
conformance to the specifications and requirements of the customer (utilization) and the
degree to which the relevant capabilities and limitations concerning the production of
goods and services are taken into account (technical).
important role in this phase. The subject of attention in the realization of quality is the
organization as a whole.
In the TQM phase, the centre of attention shifts towards the maintenance, improvement
and innovation perspective. In this phase, relatively considerable attention is paid
to the maintenance, improvement and innovation of the products produced by the
organization and to the processes and organization by means of which this is realized.
The fact that the centre of attention shifts does not mean, however, that the other
perspectives are ignored in any phase. Table 2 lists the characteristics which can be
distinguished for the various phases on the basis of the three perspectives. The
perspective Subject to the most attention per phase is indicated by double lines.
achieve the desired product. In this aspect, it is important that the organization is looked
upon as an open system which operates on an exchange basis with its environment.
The organization must be aware of this exchange and must take account of its
consequences on the quality system.
Examples are for instance environmental regulations which lead to limitations in the way
an organization functions or consumer organizations promoting the customer interests.
(b) Line-staff relationship. Although quality is realized by the organization as a whole,
the actual responsibility for the quality of a product lies within the line organization.
The quality department has an advisory and supporting role in the realization and
improvement of quality.
(c) Technological perspective. During the development process, an organization
takes into account its existing possibilities and limitations in manufacturing goods and
services.
Possibilities and limitations arise due to both decisions made within the organization
and external factors. A decision to mass-production precludes the opportunity of speedy
implementation of product changes and limits an organization's ability to respond to
changing market requirements. An external factor such as environmental regulations
may bring limitations, for example in the requirements for separation of waste materials;
at the same time, however, a quick reaction to such regulations may offer an
opportunity to gain a lead on the competition. An organization must employ all available
creativity in order to create new opportunities, minimize limitations or turn them into
opportunities.
(d) Cultural implantation. It has to be a habit of everyone in the organization to
continuously consider improvement of the products and the processes of the
organization.
This habit is anchored within the organization's culture. Personnel are aware that they
must make an effort towards improvement each and every day. The final goal, the
perfect situation, does not exist: it can always be done better. Improvements are related
to the working environment of each employee as well as to the groups within which they
function.
(e) Management commitment. Quality management forms a part of the task of every
manager within an organization. Management functions as supporting and stimulating
factor in the quality improvement process. Managers are aware of their responsibilities
concerning quality management and know what this means in relation to the
performance of their (daily) tasks. Top management is responsible for the formulation of
a quality policy which is integrated within the organization's overall policy. This quality
policy must be implemented by management itself by translating the quality objectives
and long-term quality plans into concrete short-term action plans. Middle management
plays an important role here. In addition to a positive approach to quality, management
must demonstrate this by word and deed and must possess an excellent ability to
accept change, considering the fast changes in their surroundings.
(f) Upstream emphasis. The realization of quality in upstream processes such as
market research and research and development receives considerable attention. The
underlying idea is that the quality of a product can never exceed that of its design.
Accurate and thorough market research, results in a good understanding of the
customer's requirements and demands. An organization thus knows what is wanted
and, by means of a good R & D programme, can translate these customer requirements
into a product satisfying them.This translation (of the sometimes rather abstract
customer requirements), into product specifications and design, demands a great deal
of attention. The final objective must be to bring a product onto the market that is fully
developed (without teething troubles) and satisfies the desires and requirements of the
customer.
(g) Market-in approach. The market-in approach (orientation to the customers'
requirements) is applied throughout the organization. All activities performed on behalf
of the organization are centered around the demands and requirements of the external
customer.
The selection of these three categories is taken from Zink (1990). In the conducted
research the terms are defined as follows:
1. Concept: general basic idea derived from one or more basic elements of TQM.
An example is the Zero-Defects concept (Crosby, 1987).
2. Method: a fixed, well-considered way of working in order to attain an objective
resulting from TQM. Examples of methods for achieving quality objectives are quality
circles, quality manuals and policy deployment.
3. Technique: a compilation of operations or actions of a recipe-like nature which can
be applied relatively quickly and which provides an understanding of a situation or
problem area such that the solution of a problem can be seen or is obtainable.
Examples of techniques to be used are: Pareto-analysis, FTA and FMEA.
In total, 63 concepts, methods and techniques supporting quality management were
examined. The question was then posed within which parts of the organization these
TQM and Six Sigma –the Role and Impact on Service Organization
1. Introduction
Quality is not only a strategic weapon for competing in the current marketplace,
but it also means pleasing consumers, not just protecting them from annoyances.
Therefore, a company’s specific advantage is to identify and then compete on
one or more of the dimensions of quality.
Many organizations have come to realize that achieving zero-defect goods and
services can lead not only to customer satisfaction but also to improved internal
efficiency and reduced costs. The Six Sigma quality and management
programme has been a key basis for the success of multinational companies
such as Motorola. According to recent figures, fewer than 10 percent of
companies are adopting a Six Sigma program to the point where it is going to
make any sort of significant difference to the bottom line in any meaningful period
of time.
When all key processes within a business are completed for each of these five each
phases, the business will naturally reach the Six Sigma quality. To ensure the success
of a DMAIC methodology, the company’s top leaders must undertake the role of
Champion, giving active support and encouragement to all business process owners.
The process owners in the specific Six Sigma project implementation must emphasize
the bottom-line, which has a profit contribution to the business (Byrne, 2003 cited in
Cheng, J.L. 2008, p. 185).
The key elements of Six Sigma implementation which service organizations must take
in consideration are:
• Customer ® Customer Satisfaction;
• The customer is the center of the universe ® He defines the quality;
• Process ® Think from outside to inside;
• Quality requires watching your business from customer's perspective rather than
yours. With this knowledge can add value significantly or can improve the process of
Customer.
Perspective® CTQ's (critical to quality are customer needs translated into critical
process requirements that are specific and measurable. A fully developed CTQ has five
elements: Output Characteristic, Project Output Metric, Target, Specification/Tolerance
Limits and Defect Definition);
• Employee ® Management commitment;
• People create results. Fundamentally in quality approach is the involvement of all
members/employees. The company is committed to providing opportunities and
incentives for employees who focus their talent and energy in achieving customer
satisfaction ® For all employees. This is why it can be beneficial to embed Black Belts in
business units, where they can monitor processes regularly, collect feedback and make
sound, data-based decisions. Six Sigma identifies several key roles for its successful
implementation such as: Six Sigma Champions, Six Sigma Master Black Belt, Black
Belts, Six Sigma Green Belt, Six Sigma Yellow Belt.
current measures and process focus of Six Sigma, along with its tentative people
development. It is contended that Six Sigma is a specific development of TQM,
and that Six Sigma currently belongs to the mechanistic development of TQM,
although it may be developed in a more holistic manner. Many of the
organizations currently claiming success from Six Sigma have also long
established TQM programmes, e.g. Motorola, GE, Nortel, Boeing
(Henderson and Evans, 2000 cited in McAdam, R. & Lafferty, B. 2004, p. 533).
It is quite a common view among many people engaged in service organizations
that Six Sigma requires complicated statistical tools and techniques. The truth is
that Six Sigma is not about a collection of statistical tools and techniques. In fact,
service organizations do not simply need many of the tools and techniques of the
Six Sigma toolbox. The majority of the process and quality related problems in
service organizations can be readily tackled using the simple problemsolving
tools of Six Sigma such as process mapping, cause and effect analysis, Pareto
analysis, control charts and so on (Kumar, M. et al., 2008, p. 884).
The main weakness of traditional TQM concepts is the exclusive focus on
customer requirements. Six Sigma in contrast focuses on quality from both the
customer’s and the investor’s perspectives with the aim to meet customer
requirements fully and profitably. Nevertheless, like TQM, Six Sigma requires a
strong incorporation of the corporate control system to enable companies to
objectively measure and monitor their long-term development within, and monetary
outcome of TQM using statistical techniques (Wessel, G. & Burcher, P. 2004, p. 265).
There is a cause-and-effect relationship between the total quality management
practices and corporate performance, measured by employee relations, productivity,
customer satisfaction, or profitability (Kumar, V. et al., 2009, p. 26).
The results are:
Better employee relations. Employees experienced more job satisfaction, there was a
higher rate of attendance, and there was less turnover, absenteeism and accidents.
Since the goal of any organization is to make profits, Six Sigma projects make business
processes profitable while attacking variability which leads to high scrap rate, high
rework rate, low productivity etc. In every single project, the link between the project
objectives and the business strategy should be identified (Antony J. & Banuelas R.
2002,p. 23).
Conclusion
TQM and Six Sigma are two different approaches that can be very strong together if
they are implemented in a service organization with a good business strategy. While
TQM is focused on customer, Six Sigma focused on improving quality and obtaining
zero defects in all the processes of an organization. While TQM it advocates for
increasing customer satisfaction, Six Sigma can act as an enabler for cultural change.
Nowadays because of the global crisis, almost all service organizations have suffered
and it’s very important for them to know what their customers think about the services
offered and how they can improve their process with the objective of increasing their
customer’s satisfaction, which is the goal of any competitive organization.
References
Anagnoste, S. & Agoston S., Sustainable development in the global economy,
Analele Universitatii din Oradea, 2009.
Antony, J., Six sigma and its role in financial services, The TQM Magazine,2007, 19(5).
Antony J. & Banuelas R., Key ingredients for the effective implementation of
Six Sigma program, Measuring Business Excellence, 2002, 6(4), pp. 20-27(8).
Arumugam, V., Chang, H.W. & Ooi, K.B, The, P.L., Self-assessment of
TQM practices: a case analysis, The TQM Journal, 2009, 21 (1), pp. 46-58.
Cheng, J.L., Implementing Six Sigma via TQM improvement: an empirical study in
Taiwan, The TQM Journal, 2008, 20(3), pp. 182-195.
Cioana, G., From Static Priority to Dynamic Priority in Managing Business
Processes, Review of International Comparative Management, 2009,1(1), pp. 469-475.
Forza, C. & Filippini, R., TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction:
A causal model, International Journal of Production Economics, 1998, 55, pp. 1-20.
Ghobadian, A. Gallear, D. & Hopkins, M., TQM and CSR nexus. International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management, 2007,24(7), pp.704-721.
Heckl, D, Moormann, J. & Rosemann, M., Uptake and Success Factors of
Six Sigm in the Financial Services Industry, Business Process Management Journal,
2010, 16(3).
Kumar, M., Antony, J., Madu, C.N., Montgomery, D.C. & Park, S.H.,
Common myths of Six Sigma demystified, International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management, 2008, 25(8), pp. 878-895.
Kumar, V., Choisne, F. & Grosbois. D., Kumar, U., Impact of TQM on company's
performance, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2009, 26(1), pp.
23-37.
McAdam, R. & Lafferty, B. (2004) “A multilevel case study critique of six sigma:
statistical control or strategic change?”, International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 24(5), pp. 530-549.
Prajogo, D.I. & Sohal, A.S., TQM and innovation: a literature review and
research framework, Technovation, 2001, 21, pp. 539-558.
Sila, I., Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance