Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Author
Florian Fink | florian.fink@omicronengery.com
Date
April 20, 2017
Application Area
Busbar differential protection
Keywords
RelaySimTest, System Testing, Busbar protection, PTP
Version
v2.0
Document ID
ANP_15001_ENU
Abstract
Due to the high short-circuit power on a busbar system and to guarantee the continuity of power supply, it is
necessary to switch off appearing faults selectively and in a short time. Busbar differential protection
systems can provide these functionality for many different busbar topologies. To test such a protection
system thoroughly, an application oriented approach with multiple test sets can be utilized.
This application note describes how this could be done in an easy and comfortable way using the OMICRON
RelaySimTest software. To perform a test a fault scenario is calculated based on the simulation of the power
system network. The resulting voltages and currents for the different relay locations can be used to test the
correct behavior of the differential protection system. Additionally RelaySimTest offers the possibility to
control several distributed and time synchronized CMC test sets.
© OMICRON Page 1 of 35
General information
OMICRON electronics GmbH including all international branch offices is henceforth referred to as
OMICRON.
The product information, specifications, and technical data embodied in this application note represent the
technical status at the time of writing and are subject to change without prior notice.
We have done our best to ensure that the information given in this application note is useful, accurate and
entirely reliable. However, OMICRON does not assume responsibility for any inaccuracies which may be
present.
OMICRON translates this application note from the source language English into a number of other
languages. Any translation of this document is done for local requirements, and in the event of a dispute
between the English and a non-English version, the English version of this note shall govern.
All rights including translation reserved. Reproduction of any kind, for example, photocopying, microfilming,
optical character recognition and/or storage in electronic data processing systems, requires the explicit
consent of OMICRON. Reprinting, wholly or partly, is not permitted.
© OMICRON 2017 All rights reserved. This application note is a publication of OMICRON.
DANGER
Death or severe injury caused by high voltage or current if the respective
protective measures are not complied.
Carefully read and understand the content of this application note as well as
the manuals of the involved systems before starting its practical application.
Please contact OMICRON before you continue the process if you do not
understand the safety instructions, operating instructions, or parts of it.
Follow each instruction mentioned there especially the safety instructions
since this is the only way to avoid danger that can occur when working at
high voltage or high current systems.
Furthermore, only use the involved equipment according to its intended
purpose to guarantee a safe operation.
Existing national safety standards for accident prevention and
environmental protection may supplement the equipment’s manual.
Only experienced and competent professionals that are trained for working in high voltage or high current
environments may perform this application note. Additionally, the following qualifications are required:
• Authorized to work in environments of energy generation, transmission or distribution and familiar
with the approved operating practices in such environments.
• Familiar with the five safety rules.
• Good knowledge of CMC test sets, CMGPS 588.
Before you get started with this application note, read the “Getting Started” manual [1] of RelaySimTest.
Please make sure that you also have a good knowledge about the CMC test system.
This application note describes how busbar protection systems could be tested using RelaySimTest.
Therefore it shows the following content:
1. Numerical Busbar Protection (general information)
2. Defining the System under Test
3. Overview about the hardware test setup
4. Defining the Test sets configuration
5. Defining Test cases
This application note does not describe parameter tests. To test the protection thoroughly such tests are
also recommended.
2.3 Templates
For this application note a corresponding template is installed with setup of RelaySimTest.
The template Busbar Protection double Busbar with Isolators.rstt contains the same system under test
and test cases described in the application note.
In addition the following templates for busbar protection are available:
Busbar Protection Breaker and a Half
Busbar Protection double Busbar with bypass transfer Mode
Busbar protection double Busbar with double Breaker
Busbar Protection Ring Bus Topology
Busbar Protection Single Busbar and Tie Breaker
Busbar Protection with Reverse Blocking
3.1 Considerations
Due to the high short circuit power on a busbar system and to guarantee the continuity of power supply, it is
necessary to switch off appearing faults selectively and in a short time.
Busbar
I1 I2 I3 ... In
The current difference, which is the actual protection criterion in this case, is based on Kirchhoff's current
law. This law says that the signed sum of all currents in a closed area must be zero.
𝐼1 + 𝐼2 + 𝐼3 + ⋯ + 𝐼𝑛 = 0
The occurrence of a busbar short circuit causes a differential current, which is the criterion for the protection.
𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 = |𝐼1 + 𝐼2 + 𝐼3 + ⋯ + 𝐼𝑛 |
Due to CT measurement errors and in case of CT saturation on high-current faults located outside,
differential currents can occur.
This is the reason why a restraint characteristic is used. The limit of the differential current depends on the
restraint quantity IRT (stabilization quantity IStab) as show in Figure 2 below.
𝐼𝑅𝑇 = |𝐼1 | + |𝐼2 | + |𝐼3 | + ⋯ + |𝐼𝑛 |
IDiff
k
Operating
Region
Restraining or
Stabilization Region
87P or IDiff>
IRT or IStab
One variant is the decentralized busbar protection. The system consists of field units that are connected by
optical fiber to the central unit.
Figure 3: Principle of a decentralized busbar protection (e.g. Siemens 7SS52, ABB REB500, AREVA P740)
For the centralized busbar protection, all isolator positions are sent directly to the central unit. CTs in each
bay are also connected to the corresponding input at the central unit.
Central Unit
Figure 4: Principle of a centralized busbar protection (e.g. Siemens 7SS50, ABB RED670)
The selectivity of the busbar protection can only be guaranteed if the protection does have the correct
positions of all isolator at any time. This is the reason why the protection must be configured very carefully.
The assignment of a feeder to a busbar section is done via the isolator replica, where the status is evaluated
for each isolator.
There are two independent criteria for tripping: busbar selective measurement and check zone
measurement.
i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 = i 3 + i4
i1 i2 i3 i4 i3 + i4 i1 i2
∑|𝐼𝑛 | = |𝐼3 + 𝐼4 |
The lower of these two sums is used as the stabilization current for the check zone.
The integrated breaker failure function in the busbar protection clears the affected busbar section when a
circuit breaker failure occurs. When a busbar short circuit occurs, the affected section is switched off. If this
results in a breaker failure, a transfer trip command must be sent to the opposite side in order to interrupt the
current feeding the faulty busbar.
I1 I2 I3 I4
BB A
BB B
I1 ICoupling I2
Busbar B is switched off after the circuit breaker failure time has expired, which is started by the current
criterion. If auxiliary contacts of the circuit breaker are used, busbar B is switched off in a shorter time.
BB A
BB B
IBB A IBB B
I1 I2
Figure 10 shows a busbar with its differential protection system, which is used as an example:
Figure 10: Example of protected area (CT: Current Transformer, VT: Voltage Transformer CB: Circuit Breaker, BB: Busbar)
RelaySimTest provides for busbar protection testing templates. You find them when you select Create new
document on the RelaySimTest start page.
Of course every busbar protection is different, the number of bays, positions of CTs and breakers can very.
Therefore our template must be adapted. In the next chapters we show how edit power system topology and
test cases. For this application note we use the template “Busbar Protection double Busbar with Isolators”.
Figure 18: Power system with simulated protection device for external breaker failure protection
Connect Field Unit A in addition to CB and CT to the External Protection device. Now you are able to
simulate in test cases an external breaker failure signal.
Figure 21: Exemplary of a busbar protection test setup for medium distances up to 100 m
Figure 22).
Figure 26 gives an overview of the different test cases, while the following chapters describe them in detail.
Because each busbar protection scheme is very individual, these test cases are just examples for tests.
They should explain testing methods with RelaySimTest in general.
Suitable test cases are:
Stability Tests:
1. Wiring and CT ratio check
2. Stable load flow
3. Outside faults
Faults in Protected Area:
4. Faults on busbars
5. End zone fault
6. Faults in the dead zone
5
1 6
1
3
1
For the faults in the different test cases at least the following Fault types should be used:
L1-N
L2-L3
L1-L2-L3
Depending on the relays under test, on the relay’s parameter, and on the grid where the protection system is
used, you may need to add more fault types.
The nominal trip time of the differential protection is 0 s, therefore the simulation time after a fault or
switching event is at least 0.5 s. Hence, the protection system has enough time to show its reaction on the
event.
Sometimes the behavior of the protection system depends on the prefault condition e.g. load current.
However, for this example, this distinction is not considered.
The measurements are defined to the following signals of the central unit: Trip busbar A, Trip busbar B,
Breaker failure.
In this test case, the current flows through the protected area. There is no differential current. Therefore, the
differential protection is not allowed to trip. Because of this, the assessment for all measurements is that no
stop event occurs.
If the protection system trips, it can have the following causes:
Wiring of test setup or protection system is incorrect.
CT ratio or direction does not correspond between protection system and simulation.
Parameters of protection system do not work as expected.
The fault leads to high currents flowing through the protected area. There is also no differential current.
Therefore, the differential protection is not allowed to trip. So measurement and assessment are the same
as in test case 1 & 2.
Figure 31: External breaker failure signal appears after fault entry
In this case the breaker failure function in the busbar protection will operate and trip the effected bay. To
adapt the binary slope of the simulated breaker failure signal you must click on the slope and afterwards you
can configure the slopes in the ribbon menu.
For this test case, the assessment is:
Signal Trip time min. Trip time max.
Trip busbar A No trip - start but no stop event occurs.
Trip busbar B No trip - start but no stop event occurs.
Breaker Failure No trip - start but no stop event occurs.
Trip Bay A 200 ms 250 ms
A fault on busbar leads to a differential current. Therefore, the protection system has to trip.
The measurement is defined to start from fault rising until the signals of the “Central Unit: Trip busbar A,
“Trip busbar B”, and “Breaker Failure”.
With this feature enabled, RelaySimTest remembers the relay’s initial selective trips. RelaySimTest
calculates the signals so as to repeat the previous test step with the correct simulation of the breaker
operations. Now the protection clears the fault selectively.
Iterative-Closed-Loop of RelaySimTest will now ignore the trip command for CB B. After the first iteration the
fault current will still be present. Therefore the busbar protection send the breaker failure protection signal to
trip the bay on the other end of the line at infeed B.
In this test case a fault appears between the CB and the CT in bay A, called end zone fault.
The busbar protection first trips the busbar A and when it recognized that the fault current is still present it
operates the breaker failure protection to trip the breaker on the other end of the line at infeed A.
For this test case, the assessment is:
Signal Trip time min. Trip time max.
Trip busbar A 0 ms 50 ms
Trip busbar B No trip - start but no stop event occurs.
Breaker Failure 200 ms 250 ms
This test case verifies that the busbar protection trips correctly when a fault occurs in the dead zone
between CB and CT in the coupling field bay D.
Therefore, also the Iterative Closed-Loop function should be enabled to get the correct behavior of the
protection system. When the fault appears, the protection system detect it on busbar A. So also the Iterative
Closed-Loop function is in use, the differential current persist, and the central unit will trip the breaker failure.
Figure 40: Protection system will operate breaker failure when a fault in the dead zone appears
This test case shows that the differential protection does trip correctly in case a fault occurs when both
busbars are linked by a rigid coupling with two isolators.
For this test case, you have to change the isolator topology. To change the initial position, double-click the
isolator.
To verify that the isolator, the breaker positions of the simulation and the protection are the same, you can
add an instruction commands before the test case to get a reminder before you start a test.
Figure 43: Instantaneous trip command at all bays when the busbars are linked to one protection zone
© OMICRON
www.omicron.at | www.omicronusa.com Subject to change without notice.