Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Emma Baugher
EDU 348
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 2
It has been shown through much research and practice that children often begin to form
behavior problems prior to school age (Duchaine, Jolivette, & Fredrick, 2011; Fullerton, Conroy,
& Correa, 2009; Thompson, Merchant, Anderson, Prater, & Gibb, 2012). Teachers should strive
to decrease disruptive behaviors early on because it is common for these actions to remain
continuous as the student enters the classroom, however, many children do not receive the
services they need (Moffat, 2011). Therefore, teachers should be equipped with the effective
tools to lessen these behavior problems in the classroom. For many teachers, when disruptive
behaviors occur, their initial response is to reprimand the students for their actions with verbal
warnings and office threats to gain compliance (Duchaine et al., 2011). These negative reaction
patterns often result in negative teacher-student relationships and hinder authentic instruction
time, causing fewer opportunities for students to learn and succeed in the classroom (Fullerton et
al., 2009).
It is extremely important for teachers to implement strategies that help decrease the
development of behavior problems and increase student compliance and on task behavior. One
reason students misbehave is to gain attention from classroom teachers and peers. Therefore,
teachers need to implement behavior management strategies that focus on proactively providing
positive attention toward student behavior, rather than negative attention. One strategy that uses
teacher attention is Behavior Specific Praise (BSP). BSP has been found to be beneficial in
elementary classrooms when addressing behavior problems (Fullerton et al, 2009). Through the
consistent and correct use of BSP, teachers may notice a decrease in disruptive and inappropriate
student behaviors (Stormont, & Reinke, 2009). Recent research shows that this behavior
management strategy is absent in schools or is often presented at drastically low rates, which is
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 3
unlikely to impact behaviors (Chalk, & Bizo, 2004). However, numerous studies are being
implemented to assist teachers in becoming more efficient in applying BSP in the classroom
BSP should be used in all classrooms with all students, however it can be particularly
effective in the inclusive classroom when working with students with specific behavior
challenges. Researchers have found the use of BSP is particularly effective in reducing behaviors
such as noncompliance, aggression, and disruptive noises in the classroom (Moffat, 2011). BSP
has been shown to be so effective that it is often implemented in schools as part of School Wide
Positive Behavior Supports (SWPBS), as well as with the Response to Intervention (RtII) model
(Thompson et al., 2012). Being that this strategy allows teachers to focus on students’ specific
positive behaviors, it in turn, tends to decrease negative behaviors that occur in the classroom
(Fullerton et al., 2009). This also supports inclusion and the concept of Least Restrictive
Environment (LRE) because it is a model that can be implemented in the general education
classroom by the general education teacher. BSP is a behavior management strategy that teachers
can use in order to decrease disruptive behaviors in the classroom and increase student
Definition of Practice
positive behaviors, rather than reprimanding incorrect behaviors. BSP can take the form of a
variety of written or verbal statements that acknowledge desired student behavior (Moffat, 2011).
It is argued that BSP is most effective when it is personal, genuine, contingent, and descriptive,
and provides specific information so the pupil understands why they are being praised (Chalk &
Bizo, 2004). Well-formed BSP should reflect these principles in order to be effective in
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 4
impacting student behavior (Chalk & Bizo, 2004). BSP should indicate to the student the
behavior for which he or she is being praised, resulting in clear teacher expectations (Stormont et
al., 2009). Generally, students are prone to succeed per the expectations the teacher sets for them,
therefore, making high and positive expectations apparent to students may help increase suitable
behavior (Duchaine et al, 2011). Another reason BSP is successful in modifying student
performances is because it allows students to see their behavior in a more tangible way and can
allow them to more clearly grasp the expected forms of appropriate behavior (Chalk, & Bizo,
2004).
There are two types of non-examples for behavior specific praise. The first example
demonstrates a teacher failing to give BSP for appropriate behavior, but instead reprimands
students when they show inappropriate behavior. Students are working together appropriately by
sitting quietly in their seats, sharing materials, and staying on task. The teacher does not praise
students for their appropriate behaviors. One student refuses to share an item and the other
student becomes upset and acts out. The students are reprimanded for their inappropriate
behavior. This is a negative example of BSP because the students were not being praised for
expected positive behaviors and when they behaved incorrectly, they were reprimanded. In order
for students to continue behaving appropriately, praise should be given immediately to avoid
time for negative behaviors to occur. The second example is simply giving students positive
praise, rather than behavior-specific praise. An instance of positive praise is telling students
“good job!” or “great work!” This is not the same as BSP because it is not explicitly telling
students their specific behavior that was done well, but instead generalizes the behaviors that
occurred.
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 5
BSP can be demonstrated correctly when students are working together appropriately by
sitting quietly in their seats, sharing materials, and staying on task. The teacher praises the two
students by saying, “You both are doing very well sitting quietly and sharing your materials.
Thank you for staying on task.” Students continue to show appropriate behaviors and other
students also follow their example. The praise the teacher awarded to the students told them
exactly which behaviors they were performing correctly. The teacher also ensured that the praise
was given directly and immediately while the students were acting appropriately. This is crucial
because BSP must be given to students right as the behavior is occurring in order for it to be
effective and to avoid inappropriate behaviors from forming, as they did in the non-example.
Offering BSP to students immediately following an appropriate behavior will increase the
likelihood of the student performing the targeted praise behavior in the future (Moffat, 2011).
BSP is particularly useful in the classroom because increasing the use of BSP promotes a
al., 2009). BSP creates this positive environment because specific praise provides students with
intrinsic motivation and allows them to feel more confident in their knowledge and abilities
(Stormont et al., 2009). When students are reprimanded for undesirable behaviors, it often
negatively impacts their motivation and self-esteem in the classroom because students can feel
repeatedly defeated. However, BSP is a means for teachers to shift their focus onto the positive
behaviors students can achieve, rather than only providing attention when students perform in an
undesirable manner. Thus, the use of BSP in the classroom will increase compliance and reduce
the number of reprimands because teachers are giving students the positive attention they require
to grow in place of targeting the unconstructive behaviors (Duchaine et al., 2011). This shift in
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 6
focus promotes a more positive relationship between teachers and students in the classroom
(Moffat, 2011).
BSP when used correctly and effectively causes an increase in student compliance,
engagement, and on task behavior in the classroom setting (Fullerton et al., 2009. The Glossary
of Education Reform defines student engagement as the level of responsiveness and curiosity
students show while they are learning and their optimistic outlook and passion for knowledge of
the subject (Student Engagement, 2016). Classroom compliance consists of the students
following the rules and strategies teachers implement to encourage correct behavior and
involves compliance and engagement because students are focused on the task at hand and they
are doing so because they are engaged in the material. It is important to understand these
descriptions because in order to use BSP teachers must first define what is considered acceptable
engagement. In this study, prior to intervention, researchers found through baseline data that
when students showed noncompliant behaviors the teacher would reprimand the behaviors,
which caused students to either miss instruction due to punishments or succeed with their
inappropriate behaviors. Following baseline data, the teachers in the study were given one-and-a-
half-hour individual training sessions with the investigator. These sessions included information
on BSPS and how they are used, as well as an opportunity to view the video monitoring of the
teacher during baseline data to determine appropriate times the teacher could have used BSPS
during baseline data. Teachers were able to practice forming BSPS effectively to implement in
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 7
the classroom. After intervention, when teachers implemented an increased number of BSPS,
there was evidence that all four of the students in the study increased both their levels of
compliance and engagement due to the increase in BSPS. This study also showed that when used
consistently and effectively, BSP can significantly influence behaviors and can promote a
positive relationship with teachers and students. The increase in positive relationships occurs
because the interactions for shifting from coercive to affirmative, which can create a positive
classroom atmosphere and environment. This positive atmosphere is a major reason why
students have increased their compliance and engagement in the classroom because they have
more rapport for the classroom teacher and feel safe in the classroom environment.
Similarly, a study conducted by Clark and Bizo (2004) focused on the correlation between
BSPS in the classroom and an increase in time on task of students. The authors defined on task
instructions. They hypothesized that because behavior specific praise includes explicit content
about the desired behaviors, it will increase levels of on task behavior on a higher level than
solely positive praise, which does not include specific references to behavior. The research was
conducted in two different ways. In the first two classrooms, teachers were asked to use simply
positive praise during their instruction, while the other two teachers implemented BSP.
Following initial baseline data, where teachers applied few BSPS in the classroom, the
in addition to the definitions of praise and BSP. The results of the study found that following
intervention, there was an increase in on task behavior over both observation periods for the BSP
classroom. The positive praise condition appeared to increase during the first observation,
however, during the second observation on task behaviors became stagnant. These results
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 8
demonstrate that BSP increases the on-task behavior of students when used correctly and
effectively and that BSPS are more effective in encouraging positive behaviors than general
positive praise. Both of these studies are important in the research of BSP because they
emphasize the impact it has on student compliance, engagement, and on-task behaviors, which
Professional Development
In order for BSP to be effective and consistent in the classroom, teachers must be educated
and prepared to implement this strategy. In regard to managing behavior in the classroom,
teachers often respond to disruptive behaviors with reprimanding and negative reactions to
student behavior. Students often perform undesirable behaviors for various reasons, however
teachers can impact positive classroom behavior by being intentional in how they react and
respond to disruptive behaviors (Duchaine et al., 2011). Through training in BSP through
a positive manner, that promotes a welcoming classroom environment and positive teacher-
student relationships.
Research conducted by Duchaine et al., (2011), discussed the growing need for
professional development for teachers to master BSP. The goal of this study was to provide
feedback to teachers after being observed in the classroom to increase teacher awareness of how
they interact with their students, in hope of improving teacher practice. In this study, teachers
were trained in the works of BSP in a 45-minute independent training session. Teachers were
given the tools and examples needed to effectively implement BSP statements into the
classroom. During this time, teachers set a goal of how many BSP statements they would deliver
in a 15-minute class observation period. Following the 15-minute period, the observer would
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 9
provide the teacher with performance feedback that outlined the number of BSP statements used
correctly during the 15-minute period and BSPS from the observer to the teacher. The purpose of
this study was to help teachers become masters of behavior specific praise through the use of
written feedback and coaching and to determine of these interventions would increase the use of
BSPS in the classroom. This is very important for teachers because this is a behavior strategy
that can decrease disruptive and inappropriate behaviors in the classroom and help create a
positive and more open relationship between teachers and students. The results of this student
showed that the interventions of coaching and written performance feedback increase the
Thompson et al., (2012) also studied research that encourages professional development for
training teachers on BSP. This study applied the three tier RtII Model framework to teacher
professional development on increasing BSP in the classroom. The three most used types of
professional development for teachers are meetings and workshops, video self-monitoring, and
instructional coaching. These three types of professional development corresponded with the
three tiers of this intervention model. The first tier in the intervention consisted of a one-time
professional development training conducted during a short faculty meeting. The training
presented teachers with definitions and important research developments of BSP and general
praise. Additionally, teachers were able to practice writing BSPS and delivering them
effectively. The goal following the meeting was for teachers to increase their use of BSP by
50%. During tier two, teachers video recorded themselves during a 15 to 25-minute lesson
segment. The teachers then watched the video and self-scored the data on BSP rates by counting
the number of times they use BSP during that session. Teachers in the third and final tier were
assigned coaches to provide guidance and support to the teachers by offering both personal and
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 10
technological communication to encourage and monitor teachers’ use of BSP, as well as, discuss
data throughout the process. The results of this study showed that the initial tier one intervention
did not increase BSP statements consistently, however, Tier two and Tier three interventions
steadily increased BSP and student on task behavior. These results support the idea that the
typical one-time professional development training is not a sufficient intervention to directly and
significantly impact teacher behaviors. This study is important because it shows that teachers
need to be educated in how to effectively implement behavior specific praise in the classroom to
increase the use of this strategy. Also, teachers must be given multiple opportunities for
instruction and feedback in order to truly change their behaviors and apply these behavior
management approaches into everyday teaching. The researches emphasized in this study that
the purpose of professional development for teachers is to increase student learning. Providing
teachers with these professional development opportunities ultimately impacts the extent in
which students learn and thrive in the classroom. These four studies about effectiveness of
behavior specific praise demonstrate that with the correct intervention, teachers will use BSP
more consistently in the classroom, decreasing disruptive behaviors and noncompliance, while
Research supports numerous reasons for using BSP in the classroom. BSP is an
evidenced based and cost-effective strategy that teachers can implement to promote positive
behavior in the classroom. Teaching is a rewarding profession in several ways, however, teachers
are constantly searching for resources and strategies that are evidenced based but require little
cost and effort. BSP is a stress-free and effective strategy that both special education and general
education teachers should apply in the classroom because it involves little to no preparation for
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 11
implementation and it can be used often. Teachers can never provide too much BSP in the
classroom. Another implication of BSP that teachers should contemplate is that a student’s
confidence and desire to learn can be greatly impacted by the words and reactions of leaders, role
models, and educators. It is the teacher’s vocation to instill in students a confident love of
learning both in and outside the classroom. Providing students with positive and specific
feedback, interactions, and encouragements will empower them to succeed in the classroom and
take charge of their own learning. Finally, it is important that teachers be serious about and
committed to using evidenced based behavior management strategies and they should work
together and support each other in making these positive changes in the classroom. If teachers
expect their students to reform their behaviors in the classroom, they should also be eager and
aware of the changes required in their own teaching methods. This can be achieved through
collaboration and accountability between teachers. This is a call to all educators to work in unity
and support one another in placing these positive behavior supports into the classroom in an
effective way. Through teamwork and passionate determination, teachers can implement BSP
into every classroom in their schools to increase student behavior, form positive teacher-student
Almost all of the studies completed on BSP focus on the frequency of BSP used in the
classroom. It may be useful for future research to focus on the quality, rather than the quantity of
praise statements. Researchers should now turn their focus to the quality of praise statements,
such as, which types of words should be included in a praise statement and which praise
statements are more effective than others. This is important because teachers should not only use
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 12
BSP in the classroom frequently, but they need to be aware of the most successful statements to
Another future direction for research should include a fade and maintenance phase to
professional development of BSP to ensure skill acquisition. In some studies about training
teachers to implement BSP into the classroom, there was no period of maintenance, where the
teachers were monitored after a certain period to determine if BSP was still being incorporated
into the daily instruction time. It is important for teachers to stay consistent in their behavior
stage with follow up intervention occurring at a lesser rate and a maintenance stage to ensure
Many of the studies conducted on this topic have found that using an increasing amount
of BSP in the classroom increases students’ compliance and engagement. None of the articles
discussed, however, outline for teachers the suggested amount of praise that should be used in
the classroom in order for it to be effective. There are many directions in which future research
on this topic could turn towards, however, these seemed exceptionally stimulating and vital to
Conclusion
Behavior problems usually begin to form in children prior to entering school, however, when
targeted ineffectively negative behaviors will have a major impact on teachers and the classroom.
In order to decrease these behavior problems occurring in the classroom, teachers should learn to
effectively implement behavior specific praise statements into both the special education and
inclusive classroom. Several researchers have shown through their studies that using an
increased amount of BSP in the classroom will decrease these disruptive behaviors, allowing
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 13
more time for instruction and creating a positive learning environment (Duchaine et al., 2011;
Moffat, 2011; Stormont, & Reinke, 2009). Providing students with specific praise for appropriate
behaviors, rather than reprimanding students for inappropriate behaviors, helps increase
compliance, engagement, and time on task (Stormont, & Reinke, 2009). The growing need for
schools to provide authentic professional development opportunities for teachers to extend their
use and understanding of BSP is crucial. These professional development sessions should
include feedback for teachers to become aware of their use of BSP in the classroom, as well as
follow up sessions for teachers to create consistency in their behavior management strategies.
This research on the use of BSP in the classroom is important for special education because it
equips both general and special education teachers with an effective tool to use with students
order to create for students an environment that is least restrictive for them and their needs. BSP
can be used effectively with both students in special education and general education, making
this an exceptional strategy to use to promote a positive learning environment for students with
all abilities.
BEHAVIOR SPECIFIC PRAISE 14
Bibliography
Thompson, M.T., Merchant, M., Anderson, D., Prater, M.A., & Gibb, G. (2012). Effects of tiered
Chalk, K., & Bizo, L.A. (2004). Specific praise improves on-task behavior and numeracy
enjoyment: A study of year four pupils engaged in the numeracy hour. Educational
Fullerton, E.K., Conroy, M.A., & Correa, V.I. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ use of specific
praise statements with young children at risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral
Duchaine, E.L., Jolivette, K., & Fredrick, L.D. (2011). The effect of teacher coaching with
Moffat, T.K. (2011). Increasing the teacher rate of behavior specific praise and its effect on a
Stormont, M., & Reinke, W. (2009). The importance of precorrective statements and behavior-
specific praise and strategies to increase their use. Beyond Behavior, 18(3), 26-32.
https://www.edglossary.org/classroom-management/
https://www.edglossary.org/student-engagement/