Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Herkutanto
Herkutanto
Mengenal langkah2
Failure Mode and
Effect Analysis
(Schellekens, W : Patient Safety Conference,
European Union Presidency Luxembourg, 4 – 5 April 2005)
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 1
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Herkutanto 2009
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 2
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 3
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
HFMEA
Tetapkan Tetapkan
Potential
Hazard
Efek /
Dampak
Decision
Tree
Tindakan 1
Pilih Proses Rumuskan
Failure K
yang berisiko Alur K
Mode HS
tinggi Proses K
E
D
T
Hazard
Kritis Kontrol
Score Kontrol Eliminasi
Deteksi Terima
TETAPKAN TOPIK
Desain
15
Proses baru
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 4
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Arjaty/ IMRK 17 18
Complex
2
Non standardized
Tightly coupled
Hierarchical vs team
BENTUK TIM FMEA
Tight time constraints
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 5
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
LANGKAH 1 : PILIH PROSES YANG BERISIKO TINGGI TIME LINE AND TEAM ACTIVITIES
Pilih Proses berisiko tinggi yang akan dianalisa.
Premeeting Identify Topic and notivy the team (Step 1 & 2)
Judul Proses : 1st team meeting Diagram the process, identify subprocess, verify the scope
__________________________________________________________________________ 2rd team meeting Visit the worksite to observe the process, verify that all process &
_________________________________________________________ subprocess steps are correct (Step 3)
_________________________________________________________ 3 rd team meeting Brainstorming failure modes, assign individual team members to
LANGKAH 2 : BENTUK TIM consult with process users (Step 3)
4rd team meeting Identify failure modes causes, assign individual team members to
Ketua : consult with process users for additional input (Step 3)
____________________________________________________________
5th team meeting Transfer FM & Causes to the HFMEA Worksheet (Step3). Begin the
Anggota 1. _______________ 4. hazard analysis (Step 4)
________________________________________ Identify corrective actios and assign follow up responsibilities (Step 5)
2. _______________ 5.
________________________________________ 6th,7th , 8th…. team Assign team members to follow up individual charged with taking
3. _______________ 6. meeting plus 1 corrective action
________________________________________ team meeting plus 2 Refine corrective actions based on feedback
Notulen? _________________________________________ team meeting plus 3 Test the proposed changes
Apakah semua Unit yang terkait dalam Proses sudah terwakili ? YA / TIDAK team meeting plus 4 Meet with Top Management to obtain approval for all actions
Tanggal dimulai ____________________ Tanggal selesai ___________________
Postteam meeting The advisor or his/ her designee follow up until all actions are
completed
21 22
1 2 3 4 5
3 Selection &
Procuremen
Storage
Prescribing,
Ordering,
Trancribing
Preparing
&
Dispensin
Administration
t
g
Failure Mode Failure Mode Failure Mode Failure Mode Failure Mode
Penulisan Obat R/
Wrong route
administration
24
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 6
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 7
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 8
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Arjaty/ IMRK 36
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 9
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
ANALISIS HAZARD “LEVEL DAMPAK”
DAMPA MINOR MODERAT MAYOR KATASTROPIK
K 1 2 3 4
Kegagalan yang tidak Kegagalan dapat Kegagalan menyebabkan Kegagalan menyebabkan
mengganggu Proses mempengaruhi proses kerugian berat kerugian besar
pelayanan kepada dan menimbulkan
Pasien kerugian ringan
Pasien Tidak ada cedera, Cedera ringan Cedera luas / berat Kematian
Tidak ada Ada Perpanjangan Perpanjangan hari rawat Kehilangan fungsi tubuh
perpanjangan hari rawat lebih lama (+> 1 bln) secara permanent (sensorik,
hari rawat Berkurangnya fungsi motorik, psikologik atau
permanen organ tubuh intelektual) mis :
(sensorik / motorik / Operasi pada bagian atau
psikcologik / intelektual) pada pasien yang salah,
Tertukarnya bayi
Pengunju Tidak ada cedera Cedera ringan Cedera luas / berat Kematian
ng Tidak ada penanganan Ada Penanganan Perlu dirawat Terjadi pada > 6 orang
Terjadi pada 1-2 org ringan Terjadi pada 4 -6 pengunjung
pengunjung Terjadi pada 2 -4 orang
pengunjung pengunjung
Staf: Tidak ada cedera Cedera ringan Cedera luas / berat Kematian
Tidak ada penanganan Ada Penanganan / Perlu dirawat Perawatan > 6 staf
Terjadi pada 1-2 staf Tindakan Kehilangan waktu /
Tidak ada kerugian Kehilangan waktu / kecelakaan kerja pada
waktu / keckerja kec kerja : 2-4 staf 4-6 staf
Fasilitas Kerugian < 1 000,,000 Kerugian Kerugian Kerugian > 50,000,000
Arjaty/ IMRK 37 Kes atau tanpa menimbulkan 1,000,000 - 10,000,000
Arjaty/ IMRK - 50,000,000 38
dampak terhadap pasien 10,000,000
1 Hampir Tidak Pernah Jarang sekali terjadi (dapat terjadi dalam HAMPIR TIDAK 4 3 2 1
(Remote) > 5 sampai 30 tahun) PERNAH
1
39 40
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 10
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
X X X X X X X X X
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 11
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Decision Tree
Gunakan Decision Tree utk menentukan apakah modus perlu tindakan lanjut
di“Proceed”..
Does this hazard involve a
5 sufficient likelihood of
occurrence and severity to
warrant that it be
controlled?
NO
(Hazard score of 8 or
higher) Is this a single point weakness in
NO
YES the process? (Criticality – failure
results in a system failure?)
CRITICALY
YES
Does an effective control measure
YES
already exist for the identified hazard? STOP
CONTROL Do not proceed
NO to find potential
TINDAKAN & REDESIGN Is this hazard so obvious and readily
apparent that a control measure is not YES
causes for this
failure mode
warranted?
DETECTABILITY Proceed to
NO Potential
Causes for 46
this failure
mode
47 48
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 12
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Nonstandarized Standardizing
Tightly Coupled Loosen coupling of process
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Dependent on human Use technology
intervention Optimise Redundancy
Built in fail safe mechanism
Time constraints
Documentation
Hierarchical culture Establishing a culture of
teamwork
49 50
RESULT
Proses
Redesign
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 13
F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge
PD PD
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
Herkutanto 2009
HERKUTANTO, FMEA 14