Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
VOLUME VI
AND
OCEANOGRAPHY
NUMBER 2
ABSTRACT
7 7 100
L
1
0 90
0 O O
0 80
O 0 O
o,o 70 -
0 0 :
; 60
z
w 50
2
8 8 w 40
d
0 0 : u 30
20
0 0 0
IO
O : : 0
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO
SIZE RANGE IN MM
9 9
FIG. 3. Development of the gonads in a typical
1
0 0 : intertidal population of Elminius modestus.
Dcvclopmcnt of ovary, showing the frcqucncy
0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 of individuals of each size group in which:
0 0 O
No ovarian tissue was
0 0 0 0 0 0 visible
I El
Ovary was thin, milky appearance
2. The complete cxperimcntal
FIG. design of a n d p oo r l y d ev e l o p e d
the 1959 expcrimcnt in which pairs and singletons
were equally represented on all nine positions of ovary was yellow,
the panel. 0 -Breeding individuals in pairs 2 cm moderately well developed
apart. O-Non-hrecding individuals, as single-
Ovary was large,filling much
tons, set at least 5 cm from any other individual.
of mantle space
Fertilized egg masses were
and examining some hundred specimens at pr esent
intervals. Some of the panels used were of
glass to allow continuous inspection of
gonad condition ( Crisp and Davies 1955). results were therefore pooled to represent
the behavior of a naturally occurring pop-
OBSERVATIONS ON THE BREEDING OF ulation containing a proportion of both
freely growing and crowded individuals.
ELMZNZUS MODESTUS
In Figure 3 the degree of ovarian devel-
A detailed analysis of the frequency of opment is shown as a function of the rostro-
broods throughout the year has already carinal diameter. Only a very small propor-
been made ( Crisp and Davies 1955). It tion of specimens of about 3 mm diameter
was found that a high proportion of speci- showed any trace of ovarian development,
mens exceeding 6 mm in diameter bore and fertilized eggs were rarely present in
fertilized eggs throughout the summer, but specimens of less than 4 mm. Between 4
of those of less than 5 mm diameter, the and 6 mm the proportion bearing eggs in-
proportion which bore eggs fell sharply creased abruptly with increase in size, and
with decreasing size. Figure 3 is based on on reaching 6 mm the great majority, if not
a number of examinations of groups of 30 all, had become fully mature. It can be
to 40 individuals taken during the summer seen that, of the mature population, about
months from a number of localities in two thirds carry embryos, and the rcmain-
southern England and Wales. The speci- ing third have an ovary in varying degrees
mens from all localities appeared to breed of regeneration. No account has been taken
similarly in relation to their size and the in presenting these data of the presence of
108 D. J. CRISP AND BHUPENDRA PATEL
0 ON BREEDING
0 4 s 6 7 0 9
SIZE R AN GE IN MM Crisp and Davies ( 1955) studied the pcr-
FIG.4. Development of the testis and vesicu- centage of ovigerous individuals in young
lae seminales showing the frequency of individuals growing populations situated at the center
of each size group in which: and at the edge of a group; they found that
No trace of testis or veslculae both the growth rate and the proportion
cl seminales were visible carrying eggs were greater at the edge,
where presumably there was less competi-
seminales were present tion for food, than at the center.
Testes & vesiculae semlnales The question therefore arises whether,
were moderately developed under adverse conditions of growth, there
is any significant change in the relationship
between size and the onset of maturity.
BREEDING AND GROWTH RATE IN THE BARNACLE 109
greater extent than isolated ones. This TABLE 6. Comparison of weight of individuals of
seemed unlikely, since previous experiments E. mod&us paired with their own species and
with B. balanoidcs
using B. balanoides demonstrated that the
growth in weight of paired specimens actu- Weight of w;2rvdof
ally in contact did not differ significantly isolated
incliviclunls inclividuals
Ratio
isolated/
from that of isolated ones unless the popu- (with B. (with E. paired
hnlnnoidas) modestus )
lation density was so high that other indi-
viduals crowded into contact with the pairs Group 1. Mean age 130 clays
Number of
( Crisp 1960). It sccmcd unlikely that pairs specimens 39 42
of the smaller species, E. modestus, when Wet weight 265.5 mg 230.8 mg 1.15
separated by a distance that prevented their Dry weight 160.9 mg 134.3 mg 1.20
coming into contact, would compete ap- Shell weight 130.3 mg 109.7 mg 1.19
Tissue weight 30.6 mg 24.6 mg 1.24
preciably. However, since E. moclestus had
a faster rate of beat than B. balanoides Group 2. Mean age 100 days
Number of
(Southward 1955), it was thought desir- specimens 6 6
able to investigate this possibility in a sub- Wet weight 171.8 mg 153.8 mg 1.20
sidiary experiment. Dry weight 103.1 mg 88.8 mg 1.16
Shell weight 82.8 mg 70.8 mg 1.17
GROWTH OF ELMINIUS MODESTUS Tissue weight 20.3 mg 18.0 mg 1.13
IN COMPETITION WITH BALANUS BALANOZDES Mean wet weight of B. balanoides = 919 mg
Mean dry weight of B. ba2anoides = 657 mg
An experiment was set up in 1960 with
a pattern of pits similar to that shown in
by Elminius until a month had elapsed.
Figure 2, but with additional pits drilled 2
These individuals, which were therefore a
cm away from each of the originally isolated
month younger than the rest, have been
pits. Six of these pairs of pits were allowed
classified separately as Group 2 in Table
to be occupied each by one cyprid of B.
6 below.
balnnoides which settled just before E.
The results show that, even though in
modestus. The remaining single pits and
competition with an individual of another
pairs of pits were exposed to later settlc-
species of about four times its weight,
ment by E. modestus. The necessity to ob-
growth of the non-breeding individuals re-
tain a mixed settlement made it difficult to
mained greater than that of breeding indi-
follow the previous pattern exactly, but it
viduals. The difference, whether judged by
was possible to obtain about 6 pairs with
wet weight, dry weight, shell weight or
mixed spccics and 6 pairs of E. modestus
tissue weight, was significant at the 0.01
on each plate in a random arrangement.
probability level. The difference was less
Thus it was possible, as before, to compare
than in the previous experiment carried
the amount of growth achieved by individ-
out in 1959, but this is not surprising in
uals of the latter species, which were paired
view of the large size of the adjacent speci-
and able to breed, with that of individuals
men of B. balanoides ( Figure 1B) and the
which were unable to breed because they
shorter growth period allowed before the
were paired with another species, B. bala-
specimens were weighed.
noides. In B. balnnoides the male organs A small number of specimens of R. bala-
were undeveloped. The individuals isolated noides became isolated during the experi-
from their own species were therefore in mcnt on account of the loss of the adjacent
this experiment not growing separately but E. modestus, while others were fomld to bc
were in competition with much larger and paired inadvertently with a specimen of B.
faster growing spccimcns of 23. balanoides. balanoicles within a distance of 2 cm. It
Most of the pits were filled during the was possible therefore to use the data from
first 10 days or so; a few pits, howcvcr, were thcsc individuals to measure approximately
left unoccupied or the individuals in them the effect of competition between one spcci-
were lost, so that they were not occupied men and another of 13.balanoides under the
BREEDING AND GROw’rI-I RATE IN THE BARNACLE 113
Rostro-carinal
diamctcr 13.553 mm 12.318 mm 1.100
Isolntcd 4 969 696 605 91 Breadth 13.046 mm 11.858 mm 1.100
Paired with Height 4.652 mm 4.171 mm 1.115
I%lminius modestus 44 916 655 566 89 Opercular valves :
Yaircd with length 5.904 mm 5.781 mm 1.021
Balanus halanoides 9 914 649 560 89 breadth 4.492 mm 4.252 mm 1.056
Volume of trun-
cated cone cquiva-
conditions of the experiment. The results lent to external 331.62 mm3 251.20 mm3 1.320
are given in Table 7. Insofar as the small dimensions of
size of the sample allows conclusions to be bnrnaclc
drawn, it confirms that the influence on Total weight:
wet 315.80 mg 220.96 mg 1.429
growth caused by competitio,n is very small. 211.89 mg 151.04 mg 1.403
dry
The wet and dry weights of the barnacles Tissue weight:
were reduced by only 6%, while the tissue wet 137.30 mg 86.96 mg 1.579
weight in paired specimens was only 2% dry 33.39 mg 17.04 mg 1.960
Shell weight
less than in isolated ones. 178.50 mg 134.00 mg 1.332
( dry >
We therefore conclude that the difference Opercular valves 16.747 mg 14.833 mg 1,129
in weight observed between isolated and Carina 38.854 mg 28.674 mg 1.355
paired individuals could not have resulted R. lateral 38.798 mg 28.432 mg 1.365
from competition for food, but was mainly L. lateral 37.489 mg 27.664 mg 1.355
Rostrum 46.610 mg 34.616 mg 1.346
due to loss of tissue during reproduction.
GROWTII PARAMETERS OF ELMINIUS MODESTUS growth of the opercular valves was less
Table 8 gives the weights of isolated and affected by breeding than that of other
paired individuals at the end of the 1959 structures. Whereas the shell compart-
experiment when the barnacles were some ments of isolated specimens showed a 10
6 months old. It can be seen that the linear to 12% linear increment, the valves showed
dimensions of the isolated specimens, which an increment of only 2 to 5%. Correspond-
were prevented from breeding, were some ingly, the weights of the compartments of
10% greater than those of the paired speci- isolated specimens were 35% higher, but
mens, which bred normally. The volume, those of the valves were only 13% higher.
calculated from these measurements, was We have noticed that in crammed colum-
about 32% greater. The shell weights, as nar individuals of many species the valves
expected, showed a similar increment of usually remain relatively large, whereas in
33%, but the total weight was about 40% flattened fast spreading individuals they
greater in isolated specimens. This discrep- are relatively small. The growth of the
ancy appeared to be due to the greater valves therefore appears to be less dcpend-
tissue weight, especially when dried, in the ent upon environmental factors than that
isolated specimens. Such a discrepancy was of other parts of the shell.
not wholly unexpected, for after removing
LOSS OF TtSSUE WEIGHT DUE TO BREEDING
the barnacles from the panels we were
struck by the dense tissues of the ovary, In the 1959 experiment the dry weight
which often appeared to have a two-layered of the egg masses averaged over all paired
structure and seemed to fill completely the specimens containing them was 4.131 mg.
mantle space of all the isolated specimens. On the assumption that breeding begins at
An interesting feature of the parameters an age of 40 days when the rostro-carinal
shown in Table 3 was the fact that the diameter has reached 6 mm, there would
114 b. J. CRISP AND BHUPENDRA PATIlL
be time from mid-July until December for therefore be ascribed either to seasonal
about 8 to 10 broods. This figure was cal- changes in temperature nor to loss of tissue
culated from the temperature of the sea as a result of breeding. Nor is it likely to
during this period and the relationship be due to changes in nutritional content of
between the brood period and temperature the water, since similar growth curves may
given by Crisp and Davies ( 1955). be obtained for specimens which settle in
Since the size of the egg mass is likely late autumn and reach maturity in early
to be proportional to volume and therefore spring, and also for those that settle in
to the cube of the rostro-carinal diameter, spring and reach maturity in early summer.
the total weight of eggs produced will be
CONTROL OF GROWTH OF SHELL AND TISSUE
less than the product of 4.131 and the num-
bcr of broods, since 4.131 is the weight of The shell of non-breeding specimens was
the last and largest brood. On the assump- considerably larger than that of breeding
tion that the broods are produced at equal individuals, the increase corresponding
intervals of linear growth, and their weight closely with the greater weight of body
is proportional to the body volume, we tissue. The weight of the shell was always
may calculate for 8 broods a total weight closely related to that of the tissues, though
of 15.9 mg and for 10 broods a weight of it must be remembered that in this investi-
20.1 mg. The difference in the dry weight gation all the individuals were of roughly
between isolated and breeding specimens the same age and had grown under the
was 211.9 - 151.0 = 60.9 mg, but of this same conditions. It is possible that varia-
44.5 mg was accounted for by the differ- tions in the relative weights of shell and
ence in the mean dry weights of the shell. tissue may exist which depend upon the
Hence the difference in mean tissue weight age of the individual and on the environ-
of the breeding and non-breeding speci- ment in which it grew.
mcns was 16.4 mg. To obtain a comparison It has been shown (Crisp 1960) that, if
of tissue weights of isolated and paired the collection of food by the cirri was the
specimens, excluding the weight of cm- limiting factor in growth, and if the cirral
bryos in the latter, the weight of one pair net grew isometrically with the rest of the
of egg masses should be subtracted from barnacle, then the relation between the
the mean weight of the paired specimens, diameter of the base and time would be
since the dry weight of most oE them linear. Though linearity is typical of the
included that of the egg masses. After early part of the growth curve of many
making this small correction the average species, it does not necessarily follow that
loss in tissue weight due to breeding was food is the limiting factor; such a view
20.5 mg. The close agreement of this fig- may be an oversimplification. Ncverthe-
ure with the estimated output of tissue in less, growth of a barnacle is greatly de-
the form of egg masses indicates that ovar- pendent on the water flow past it, and
ian regeneration is the main factor reducing therefore probably on the amount of nutri-
the reserves of breeding specimens so ent matter carried to it by the water (Crisp
causing them to grow more slowly. The 1960). If we accept that growth rate is
loss of seminal fluid may either be a negli- largely dependent on the food supply it
gible drain on resources or be a common follows that after maturity when, even in
factor to both breeding and non-breeding non-breeding individuals, growth slows
specimens. down, another limitation must superimpose
The curves of growth in Figure 4 show itself on that due to the amount of food
that a decline in growth rate occurs both collected. An obvious suggestion is that
in breeding and non-breeding specimens changes associated with maturity occur in
and this decline begins before the sea the endocrine balance, and that these
temperatures fall appreciably from their changes cause growth to be reduced below
maximum. The decline in growth, coinci- the rate that purely nutritional factors
dent with the onset of maturity, cannot could support. However, our results show
BREEDING AND GROWTH RATE IN THE BARNACLE 115
that even if the eggs as well as body tissue rate of volume increase du/dt would be
are taken into account, the mean rate of proportional to an area + a thickness and
tissue production of the smaller breeding hence to the first power of a characteristic
individuals is no more than that of the length 1; the rate of increase in length
large non-breeding ones. If growth in dZ/dt will then vary at l/Z. Such processes
body size were being controlled at a level would become increasingly important with
within the capacity of the animal’s nutri- increase in size and the diameter would
tional potential, it seems likely that the follow the square root of the animal’s age
breeding specimens would have been able and not increase directly with it.
to make good, in part at least, their losses Further work to elucidate the fundamen-
caused by oviposition. It seems probable, tal processes controlling growth in cir-
therefore that, even during the period of ripcdes is clearly desirable. Most of the
declining growth rate, the rate of tissue problems that have been discussed above,
production was limited absolutely by some such as the food s~zpply and physico-chem-
factor such as food collection, rate of diges- ical factors, require a greater degree of
tion of food, or mobilization of tissue-build- control than is possible in the field. They
ing material. depend therefore for their solution on de-
We shall therefore consider mechanisms veloping laboratory techniques for feeding
that might lead to a fall in growth rate an d maintaining these animals in a con-
and at the same time be consistent with a trolled environment.
strict limitation on the amount of material
available for tissue production. The sim- REFERENCES
plest suggestion would be to postulate that, BARNES, II., AND H. T. POWELL. 1953. The
when the animal reaches a certain size, growth of Balunus balanoides (L. ) and B.
roughly coincident with maturity, growth crenatuus Brug. under varying conditions of
ceases to bc isometric because some struc- y;;m;i;;ion. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 32 :
ture, vital to food collection or utilization, CRISP, D. J: 1954. The breeding of Balanus
such as the cirral net or gut, grows at a porcatus (da Costa) in the Irish Sea. J.
rate that is less than proportional to that Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 33: 473-496.
of the rest of the animal. Another and per- -. 1958. The spread of Elminius modes-
tus Darwin in north-w& Europe. J. Mar.
haps more likely explanation depends on Biol. Ass. U.K., 37: 483-520.
the physical limitation caused by diffusion. -. 1960. Factors influencing growth rate
If growth continued isometrically, diffu- Ee$lanus balanoidess. J. Anim. Ecol. (in
sion processes could not keep in scale with
AND P. N. J. CIID?I'ERFIELD. 1948. Oc-
increasing size, but would cause the rate currcncc of Elminius modestus Darwin in
of transport of metabolites to lag behind. British waters. Nature, 161: 64.
Fick’s law states that for a given fall in AND P. A. DAVIES. 1955. Observations
concentration across, say, a membrane, the in vivo on the breeding of Elminius modestus
transport of mass will be proportional to grown on glass slides. J. Mar. Biol. Ass.
U.K., 34: 357-380.
the area and inversely proportional to the
SOU'ITIWARD, A. J. 1955. On the bchaviour of
thickness. Hence, if the volume increase barnacles. I The relation of cirral and other
of the animal were limited by diffusion of activities to tcmpcrature. J. Mar. Biol. Ass.
mass, then, assuming isometric growth, its U.K., 34: 403-422.