Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
References: TES-P-122.11
TCS-Q-113.02
AASHTO Soil Classification
Bishop Method for Slope Analysis.
Existing Site/ground Condition:
It is Understood that the existing soil strata is of poorly graded sand and engineering fill has been deposited maunally over it.
both poorly graded sand and the engineering fill formation can fail in shear thus stability is compromised and requires stability analysis.
As there is not water table, the soil will only fail in shear behavior as shown in the figures.
Existing Soil Type:
Slope length = 28 m
Slope Cut/Formation = Formation
Bearing Capacity = 150 kN/m2
V= 1
H= 1.3
Water table = Not Encountered
Thickness of Stone Pitching = 0.3 m
Thickness of mortar Slope bench = 0.1 m
Stone Type SP = Gs = 2.5
Density of Stone = 2600 kg/m3
Failure Plane Slope = 25 Degrees
Internal Friction Angle = 30 Degrees
Cohesion = c = 0 kPa
Friction coeff = m = 0.4
F.O.S = 2
Driving Forces
Wsina = 1441.1 kN
Resisting Forces
FOS =
Driving Forces
Slope length = 28 m
Slope Cut/Formation = Formation
Bearing Capacity = 150 kN/m2
V= 1
H= 1.3
14.6
22.2
28
40.4 17.1
L1 = H [ 1/tana-1/tanq] = 17.4 m
L2 = 39.6 m
h1 = 17.1 m
L3 = 22.2 m
L= H/sina = 34.1 m
b = 169.8
Analysis of Forces along the slope:
c = 214.2
c Vertical comp 214.2 kN
b Hyp 169.8 kN a = 131
a Base 130.6 kN
a = 104
Resisting Forces:
cL + [Wcosa] tanf = 2414.3 kN
Driving Forces:
Wsina = 1812.1 kN
Resisting Forces
FOS =
Driving Forces
Check Sliding:
Sliding Force 103.5 kN
Soil Pressure 18.0 kN 2m
Pressure due to surcharge 7.6 kN 150mm
Total Sliding force = 129.2 kN 2.6m
Slope length = 22 m
Slope Cut/Formation = Formation
Bearing Capacity = 150 kN/m2
V= 1
H= 1.3
Water table = Not Encountered
Thickness of Stone Pitching = 0.3 m
Thickness of mortar Slope bench = 0.1 m
Stone Type SP = Gs = 2.5
Density of Stone = 2600 kg/m3
Failure Plane Slope = 30 Degrees
Internal Friction Angle = 30 Degrees
Unit weight of Soil = 0.0 kN/m3
Cohesion = c = 0 kPa
Friction coeff = m = 0.4
F.O.S = 2
31.1
13.7
17.4
22
26.8 13.4
L1 = H [ 1/tana-1/tanq] = 13.7 m
L2 = 31.1 m
h1 = 13.4 m
L3 = 17.4 m b = 133.4
L= H/sina = 26.8 m
c = 168.3
Driving Forces:
Wsina = 84.1 kN
Resisting Forces
FOS =
Driving Forces
Slope length = 16 m
Slope Cut/Formation = Formation
Bearing Capacity = 150 kN/m2
V= 1
H= 1.3
22.6
9.9
12.7
16
19.5 9.8
L1 = H [ 1/tana-1/tanq] = 9.9 m
L2 = 22.6 m
h1 = 9.8 m
L3 = 12.7 m b = 97.0
L= H/sina = 19.5 m
c = 122.4
Resisting Forces:
cL + [Wcosa] tanf = 823.3 kN
Driving Forces:
Wsina = 617.9 kN
Resisting Forces
FOS =
Driving Forces
Check Sliding:
Sliding Force 59.1 kN
Soil Pressure 14.4 kN 1.6m
Pressure due to surcharge 7.6 kN 150mm
Total Sliding force = 81.2 kN 1.9m
Slope length = 10 m
Slope Cut/Formation = Formation
Bearing Capacity = 150 kN/m2
V= 1
H= 1.3
36.8
14.6
22.2
28
40.4 17.1
L1 = H [ 1/tana-1/tanq] = 6.2 m
L2 = 14.1 m
h1 = 6.1 m
L3 = 7.9 m
L= H/sina = 12.2 m
b = 60.6
Analysis of Forces along the slope:
c = 76.5
c Vertical comp 76.5 kN
b Hyp 60.6 kN a = 47
a Base 46.6 kN
Resisting Forces:
cL + [Wcosa] tanf = 340.7 kN
Driving Forces:
Wsina = 255.7 kN
Resisting Forces
FOS =
Driving Forces
Check Sliding:
Sliding Force 37.0 kN 1.3m
Soil Pressure 13.5 kN
150mm
Pressure due to surcharge 7.6 kN
1.5m
Total Sliding force = 58.1 kN
2m
150mm
2.6m
1.9m
150mm
2.2m
1.3m 1.6m
150mm 150mm
1.5m 1.9m
1. Contractor to confirm the extent of slope lies within the ROW periphery of Nation
2. As the slope is greater than 30 degrees, slope stability must be analyses/checked. A
3. Confirm that the base/toe foundation (0.6m x 0.9m at the base of stone pitched slo
4. Properties of soil at toe of stone pitching surface shall be confirmed and listed in t
5. Both the design report and the drawing report shall be verified and stamped by Co
6. Engineering properties of engineering fill shall be listed, which will be ultimately
7. Remove the drainage from the stone pitched slopes, the stone pitched slope will se
8. Show the dimensions of proposed precast concrete curb.
9. Slope protection shall be strictly as per TESP-122.11 Rev.01 Clause 5.0.
10. Slope of 1:2 is not correct and shall be as per actual site condition/proposed slope
11. Thickness of mortar shall be 100mm and the mortar mix shall be 1:4, indicate wat
12. Indicate slope, curb & slope formation lines etc, on plan view.
13. Add in drawing the following notes;
a. No voids shall be left in between the stone and stone pitching surface.
b. Placement of concrete/mortar and curing shall be according to TCS-P-122.05 R
c. All concrete & mortar shall be severe exposure type as per 70-TMSS-03
d. Maintenance: If stones are displaced, the stone pitching slope shall be repaired
e. Prepare a sound slope before constructing the stone pitching; it must be free of
f. Ensure an even upper surface to the stone pitching.
g. Build the stone pitching carefully, with the stones fitted together firmly.
h. Engineer to confirm the properties of soil at toe of stone pitching surface.
ROW periphery of National Grid SA. ROW is within the boundary of National Grid SA.
ust be analyses/checked. Attach calculation for slope stability analysis check as per the site condition. Refer TCS-Q-113.02 Rev.01, Clause
Complied.
e base of stone pitched slope is enough to tackle the failure of the slope, sliding and bearing due to slicing load.
Size changed. Refer Drawing.
e confirmed and listed in the report. Complied.
erified and stamped by Consultant. Complied.
which will be ultimately be used in both slope stability check and sizing of toe foundation.
Complied.
stone pitched slope will self-drain the rain water as it is noted that precast concrete curb is flushed with the stone pitching.
Complied.
Complied.
v.01 Clause 5.0. Complied.
condition/proposed slope formation. Complied.
shall be 1:4, indicate water/cement ratio in brackets. Refer TCS-Q-113.02 Rev.01, Clause 11.
We recommend Thickness of mortar as 50mm will be enough to form a binding su
Complied.
Complied.
pitching surface.
rding to TCS-P-122.05 Rev.00
s per 70-TMSS-03
g slope shall be repaired as soon as possible.
tching; it must be free of loose debris and topsoil, and trimmed to an even surface.
ed together firmly.
ne pitching surface.
nough to form a binding surface.
Example 11.3 R
b
Bishop's simplified method
b
Homogenous soil
su 0 kPa
f' 33 deg.
gw z
9.8 kN/m3 zw
gsat 18 kN/m3
zcr 0.00 m
zs 4 m
FS 1.1 assumed q
No tension crack
ESA
Slice b z W=gbz zw ru q mj Wsinq W (1 - ru)tanf' m
m m kN m deg
1 4 2 144.0 0 0.00 -23 1.45 -56.3 135.6
2 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 -10 1.13 -37.5 159.0
3 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.0 140.3
4 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 9 0.93 33.8 129.9
5 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 17 0.89 63.2 124.3
6 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 29 0.86 104.7 120.8
7 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 39.5 0.87 137.4 122.3
8 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 49.5 0.91 164.2 127.7
9 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 65 1.04 195.8 146.5
Sum 605.3 1206.2
FS 1.99
Tension crack
FS 1 assumed ESA
Slice b z W=gbz zw ru q mj Wsinq W (1 - ru)tanf' m
m m kN m deg
1 4 2 144.0 0 0.00 -23 1.50 -56.3 140.3
2 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 -10 1.15 -37.5 160.9
3 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.0 140.3
4 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 9 0.92 33.8 128.8
5 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 17 0.87 63.2 122.4
6 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 29 0.84 104.7 117.9
7 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 39.5 0.84 137.4 118.4
8 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 49.5 0.87 164.2 122.7
9 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 65 0.99 195.8 0.0
Sum 605.3 1051.6
FS 1.74
Tension crack filled with water
R 14.3 m
TCM/R 0.0 kN
FS 0.95 assumed ESA
Slice b z W=gbz zw ru q mj Wsinq W (1 - ru)tanf' m
m m kN m deg
1 4 2 144.0 0 0.00 -23 1.53 -56.3 143.1
2 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 -10 1.15 -37.5 162.0
3 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.0 140.3
4 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 9 0.91 33.8 128.1
5 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 17 0.86 63.2 121.3
6 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 29 0.83 104.7 116.3
7 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 39.5 0.83 137.4 116.3
8 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 49.5 0.86 164.2 120.0
9 4 3 216.0 0 0.00 65 0.96 195.8 0.0
Sum 605.3 1047.4
FS 1.73
TSA
su b/cosq
4
0.0 #VALUE!
0.0 13.00
0.0 10.00
0.0 9.00
0.0 8.00
0.0 12.00
0.0 10.50
0.0 10.00
0.0 15.50
0.0
0.00
TSA
su b/cosq
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
TSA
su b/cosq
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00