Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1




Confirmation bias Projection bias Authority bias Loss aversion bias

We believe what we want to believe by favouring From behavioural economics, over-predicting
Favouring authority figure opinions ideas within Once a decision has been made, sticking to it
information that confirms pre-existing beliefs or future tastes or preferences will match current
innovation teams. This means that innovative rather than taking risks due to the fear of losing
tastes or preferences. This bias has particular
preconceptions. This results in looking for
creative solutions that confirm our beliefs rather influence as new innovations are conceived in the
ideas coming from senior team members trump or
better all others, even if other concepts, ideas and
what you gained in starting something and
wishing to see it finished. We also attach more
Spot the biases. Identify
now and are projected into the future when they
than challenge them.
enter markets resulting in over value-
inputs could be more creative and relevant to
problem solving.
value to something once we have made an
emotion investment in it. As a consequence of
the 16 innovation
appreciation of consumer preferences.
effort, time and energy put into creative thinking,
team members can become biased and become
specific biases affecting
emotionally attached to their outcomes. To you or your team at key
remedy this, the 11th commandment: “thou shalt
not fall in love with thy solutions”. moments by listing them

False causality Action bias Self serving bias Framing bias

Citing sequential events as evidence the first When faced with ambiguity favouring doing Favouring decisions that enhance self-esteem. Being influenced by the way in which information
caused the second. This can occur within the something or anything without any prior analysis This results in attributing positive events to is presented rather than the information itself.
Design Thinking empathise phase where you are even if it is counterproductive. Team members can oneself and conversely negative events as blame We see this one all the time particularly when
intentionally seeking confirmation of causality feel that they need to take action regardless of on oneself. Within innovation workshops this can developing prototypes for pitching as well as in Know & conquer your
between what people say vs. what they do, whether it is a good idea or not. This can be an mean that decisions made can be loaded with presenting polished slides. People will avoid risk if
leading to taking the wrong problems or needs issue when under time pressure in strict design personal agendas rather than customer and presented well and seek risk if presented poorly enemy. Reflect and
forward to solve. sprint workshops for example. business logic for the company. meaning that decision making logic can easily be
skewed. challenge biases
identified by openly
discussing impacts on
current decision making
at key decision making

Ambiguity bias misrepresentation Bandwagon bias Conformity bias

Favouring options where the outcome is more Knowingly understating the costs and overstating Favouring ideas already adopted by others. This is
Choices of mass populations influence how we
knowable due to previous proven experiences. the benefits. When developing innovation especially influential when linked to authority
think, even if against independent personal
This bias can have significant impacts for concepts, ballpark figures and business model bias. Bandwagon effect is a common occurrence
innovation outcomes because it is a process that
is fundamentally risky and unknown, therefore
prototypes, teams are prone to understating the
true costs and overstating the likely benefits in
we see in workshops. The rate and speed at which
ideas are adopted by others (through discussion,
judgements. This can result in poor decision
making and lead to groupthink which is 3
particularly detrimental to creativity as outside
there is a strong tendency to stick to what is order to get a project approved (which happens all …) can significantly influence the likelihood of
opinions can become suppressed leading to self-
already known. If team members subconsciously the time in large governmental contracting). those ideas and concepts being selected by the
censorship and loss of independent thought.
favour what they know, you will most likely not Over-optimism is then spotted and challenged by group and taken forward.
diverge creative thinking and instead, stick closely managers assessing how truly innovative team Overcome Innovation
to what you’ve done previously. outcomes are.
Biases. Flip, reverse,
remove biases identified
by asking questions like:

What if x, y, z bias did not

exist at this moment?

What if the opposite of

this bias were true at this
Pro-innovation bias Anchoring bias Status-quo bias Feature positive effect

New innovations should be adopted by all Being influenced by information that is already Favouring the current situation or status quo and (close links with optimism bias): due to limited
Would you individually
members society (regardless of the wider needs)
and are pushed-out and accepted regardless.
known or that is first shown. This causes pre-
loaded and determined tunnel vision and
maintaining it due to loss aversion (or fear of
losing it) and do nothing as a result. This is a subtle
time or resources, people tend to focus on the
‘good’ benefits whilst ignoring negative effects
(or as a group) make the
Novelty and ‘newness’ are seen as inherently
good, regardless of potential negative impacts
influences final decision making. We deliberately
manipulate team members’ minds by ‘pre-loading’
bias on an emotional level that makes us reduce
risk and prefer what is familiar or “the way we do
even when the negative effects are significant.
This is influential when deep-diving into specific
same decision in light of
(inequality, elitism, environmental damage, etc) them one of our warm-up exercises to things round here” as it is known. It has severe new feature sets for new concepts (especially new awareness?
resulting in new ideas and concepts generated demonstrate this bias at play. The impact is highly- consequences when seeking out new ways to when coupled with loss aversion bias), because it
being judged through somewhat rose-tinted significant on creative thinking and outcomes. creatively solve needs and problems. means that teams will overlook missing
spectacles. information especially when it is outside
expertise resulting in taking ideas forward with
critical flaws.

Download this poster

W e’ r e a b u s i n e s s
and more tools at
innovation consultancy
w w w. b o a r d o fi n n o v a t i o n . c o m