INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: AMADO M. CADIONG Name of Rater: NELDA T. QUIBOLEN

Position: T-I Position: MT-I
Review Period: Date of Review: APRIL 2017-2018
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Quezon CIty

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING

EVALUATION
Major
Final
Weight
Actual Rating Score
Outputs
Key Result Objectives Timeline per Quality Efficiency Timeliness Results
(MFOs)
Areas KRA
(KRAs)

1. Teaching- 1. Prepared daily lesson June to 30% 5 All daily lesson plans/logs prepared 100% of the daily lesson Submitted all daily lesson
Learning plans/logs of activities within the March had complete parts and description plans/logs was submitted plans/logs on time
Process rating period with:
( 40%) 4 Had one of the complete parts and 85-99% of the daily lesson Submitted all daily lesson
description missing plans/logs was submitted plans/logs an hour late
1.1 Complete parts and
description 3 Had two of the complete parts and 75-84% of the daily lesson Submitted all daily lesson
description missing plans/logs was submitted plans/logs two hours late

2 Had three of the complete parts 51-74% of the daily lesson Submitted all daily lesson
and description missing plans/logs was submitted plans/logs three hours late

1 Had four or more of the complete 50% and below or no daily Did not submit all daily lesson
parts and description missing lesson plans/logs was plans/logs
submitted

1.2. Appropriate, adequate and June to 5 Used 100% of appropriate, adequate and Appropriate, adequate and updated Used appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials March updated instructional materials in teaching instructional materials were 100% updated instructional materials in
all lessons used in teaching a lesson teaching all lessons daily

4 Used 85-99% of appropriate, adequate and Appropriate, adequate and updated Used appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in teaching instructional materials were 85-99% updated instructional materials in
all lessons used in teaching a lesson teaching most of the lessons daily

3 Used 75-84% of appropriate, adequate and Appropriate, adequate and updated Used appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials in teaching instructional materials were 75-84% updated instructional materials in
all lessons used in teaching a lesson teaching some of the lessons daily

2 Used 51-74% of appropriate, adequate and Appropriate, adequate and updated Seldom used appropriate, adequate
updated instructional materials in teaching instructional materials were 51-74% and updated instructional materials
all lessons used in teaching a lesson in teaching all lessons daily

1 No appropriate, adequate and updated Appropriate, adequate and updated Did not use appropriate, adequate
instructional materials were used in instructional materials were 50% and updated instructional materials
teaching all lessons and below used in teaching a lesson in teaching all lessons daily
 Major
Final Weight per
Key Result Actual Rating Score
Outputs Objectives Timeline KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness
(MFOs) Areas Results
(KRAs)

1.3. Higher order June to 5 100% developed HOTS in teaching all All daily lesson plans/logs
thinking skills (HOTS) March lessons daily developed 100% HOTS
developed NOT MEASURABLE
4 85-99% developed HOTS in teaching
most of the lessons daily

3 75-84% developed HOTS in teaching

some of the lessons daily
Attained the desired learning
2 Seldom used HOTS in teaching all competencies within the rating
lessons daily period

1 Did not use HOTS in teaching all

lessons daily
100% of the desired learning
1.4. Desired learning June to 5 Attained 100% of the desired learning competencies was attained
competencies March competencies based on the budget of
attained based on the work
budget of work 85-99% of the desired learning
4 Attained 85-99% of the desired learning competencies was attained
competencies based on the budget of
work
75-84% of the desired learning
3 Attained 75-84% of the desired learning competencies was attained
competencies based on the budget of
work
51-74% of the desired learning
2 Attained 51-74% of the desired learning competencies was attained
competencies based on the budget of
work
50% and below of the desired learning
1 Attained 50% and below of the desired competencies was attained
learning competencies based on the
budget of work
100% interaction was elicited from a Interaction was elicited in all
2. Facilitated learning June to 5 Teaching methods and strategies class lessons that require it
through innovative March elicited 100% interaction from a class
teaching strategies 85-99% interaction was elicited from a Interaction was elicited in most
4 Teaching methods and strategies class of the lessons that require it
elicited 85-99% interaction from a class
2.1. Child-centered 75-84% interaction was elicited from a Interaction was elicited in some
activities 3 Teaching methods and strategies class of the lessons that require it
elicited 75-84% interaction from a class
51-74% interaction was elicited from a Seldom interaction was elicited
2 Teaching methods and strategies class in all lessons that require it
elicited 51-74% interaction from a class
50% and below or no interaction was No interaction was elicited in all
1 50% and below or no interaction was elicited from a class lessons that require it
elicited from a class
 Major
Final
Key Result Objectives Timeline
Outputs
(MFOs) Areas Weigh Quality
t per
(KRAs) KRA
2.2. Cooperative learning June to 5 Cooperative learning strategy was
March 100% effective when used
4 Cooperative learning strategy was
85-99% effective when used
3 Cooperative learning strategy was
75-84% effective when used
2 Cooperative learning strategy was
51-74% effective when used
1 Cooperative learning strategy was
never used
2.3. ICT Integration June to
March 5 ICT Integration is 100% evident for
lessons that require it
4 ICT Integration is 85-99% evident for
lessons that require it
3 ICT Integration is 75-84% evident for
lessons that require it
2 ICT Integration is 51-74% evident for
lessons that require it
1 ICT Integration was not evident for
lessons that require it
3. Initiated discipline of June to 5 Pupils were 100% guided in the
learners through setting of March observation of classroom rules and
classroom/school rules guidelines as evidenced by no
and guidelines within the guidance report on student discipline
rating period
No guidance case/issue 4 Pupils were 85-99% guided in the
reported observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by 1-2
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
Efficiency
100% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
85-99% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
75-84% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
51-74% cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used
50% and below or no cooperative
learning strategy was used
100% ICT Integration is evident for all
lessons that require it
85-99% ICT Integration is evident for
all lessons that require it
75-84% ICT Integration is evident for
all lessons that require it
51-74% ICT Integration is evident for
all lessons that require it
50% and below or no ICT Integration is
evident for all lessons that require it
100% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
85-99% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
Actual Rating Score
Timeliness Results
Cooperative learning strategy was
effective when used in all lessons that
require it
Cooperative learning strategy was
effective when used in most of the
lessons that require it
Cooperative learning strategy was
effective when used in some of the
lessons that require it
Seldom cooperative learning strategy
was effective when used in all
lessons that require it
Cooperative learning strategy was not
used
ICT Integration was used in all
lessons that require it
ICT Integration was used in most of
the lessons that require it
ICT Integration was used in some of
the lessons that require it
Seldom ICT Integration was used in
all lessons that require it
ICT Integration was not used in all
lessons that require it
Pupils were guided in the observation
of school/classroom rules and
guidelines within the rating period
 Major Key
Final
Output Result
s Areas Objectives
(MFOs) (KRAs)
4. Monitored attendance,
diversity appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
atmosphere, cleanliness and
orderliness of classrooms
including proper waste
disposal daily
4.1. Maintained safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of
floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal
4.2. Carried out attendance
checking systematically to
lessen absenteeism
Timeline
Weight
per
KRA Quality
3 Pupils were 75-84% guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by 3-4
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
2 Pupils were 51-74% guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by 5-6
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
1 Pupils were 50% and below guided in
the observation of classroom rules
and guidelines as evidenced by 7 up
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
5 Maintained 100% safety, orderliness
and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal
4 Maintained 85-99% safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
3 Maintained 75-84% safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
2 Maintained 51-74% safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
1 Maintained 50% and below safety,
orderliness and cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste disposal
5 Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 90-100% of pupils’
attendance chart or log.
4 Attendance checking was
systematically carried out as
evidenced by 85-89% of pupils’
attendance
Actual Rating Score
Results
Efficiency Timeliness
75-84% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
51-74% pupils were guided in the
observation of school/classroom rules
and guidelines
50% and below or pupils were not
guided in the observation of
school/classroom rules and guidelines
100% safety, orderliness and Maintained safety orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper cleanliness of floors, toilets and
waste disposal were maintained proper waste disposal daily
85-99% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
75-84% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
51-74% safety, orderliness and
cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal were maintained
50% and below or safety, orderliness
and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were not
maintained
90-100% of pupils’ attendance was Attendance checking was
evident systematically carried out daily
85-89% of pupils’ attendance was
evident
 Major
Final
Outputs Key Result Objectives Timeline Actual Rating Score
Weigh Results
(MFOs) Areas t per
(KRAs) KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness

3 Attendance checking was 80-84% of pupils’ attendance was

systematically carried out as evident
evidenced by 80-84% of pupils’
attendance

2 Attendance checking was 75-79% of pupils’ attendance was

systematically carried out as evident
evidenced by 75-79% of pupils’
attendance

1 Attendance checking was 75% and below of pupils’ attendance

systematically carried out as was evident
evidenced by 75% and below of
pupils’ attendance

2. Learner’s 1.Monitored, evaluated, 20 5 Class record reflected the bases of 100% of pupils’ ratings in all Submitted on or before the scheduled
Outcome and maintained pupils’ 100% of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled was date every grading period
% classes/subject areas handled reflected in the class record
progress within the
( 30 %) rating period through:
4 Class record reflected the bases of 85-99% of pupils’ ratings in all Submitted a day after the scheduled
1.1 an updated class 85%-99% of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled was date every grading period
record June to classes/subject areas handled reflected in the class record
March Submitted a day after the scheduled
3 Class record reflected the bases of 75-84% of pupils’ ratings in all date
75%-84% of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled was every grading period
SAME classes/subject areas handled reflected in the class record
INDICATOR
S OF Q AND 2 Class record reflected the bases of 51-74% of pupils’ ratings in all Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
E 51%-74% of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled was scheduled date
classes/subject areas handled reflected in the class record every grading period
10% IS
HIGH AS 1 Class record reflected the bases of 50% and below of pupils’ ratings in all Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
MPS 50% and below of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled was scheduled date
SUGGESTI classes/subject areas handled reflected in the class record every grading period
ON IS 3%
1.2. Pupils’ portfolio 5 Pupils portfolio contained 100% of his 100% of pupils’ accomplishment are Pupils portfolio submitted on or
June to accomplishment within the rating included in portfolio before the scheduled date every
March period grading period within the rating period

4 Pupils portfolio contained 85%-99% 85-99% of pupils’ accomplishment are Submitted a day after the scheduled
of his accomplishment within the included in portfolio date every grading period within the
rating period rating period

3 Pupils portfolio contained 75%-84% 75-84% of pupils’ accomplishment are Submitted a day after the scheduled
of his accomplishment within the included in portfolio date every grading period within the
rating period rating period
Major
Final Key Result Objectives Timeline Weigh Actual Rating Score
Outputs
(MFOs)
Areas t per Quality Efficiency Timeliness Results
(KRAs) KRA

2 Pupils portfolio contained 51%-74% 51-74% of pupils’ accomplishment are Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
of his accomplishment within the included in portfolio scheduled date
rating period every grading period

1 Pupils portfolio contained 50%-and 50% and below of pupils’ Submitted 2 to 3 days after the
below of his accomplishment within accomplishment are included in scheduled dateevery grading period
the rating period portfolio within the rating period

1.3 Summative/Unit June to 5 Test questions were 100% logically 100% of the test questions were Administered on or before the
Test with Table of March sequenced with TOS congruent logically sequenced with TOS scheduled date every grading period
Specifications (TOS) between content and skills tested congruent between content and skills
tested

4 Test questions were 85%- 85-99% of the test questions were Administered a day after the
99%logically sequenced with TOS logically sequenced with TOS scheduled date every grading period
congruent between content and skills congruent between content and skills
tested tested

3 Test questions were 75%- 75-84% of the test questions were Administered 2 days after the
84%logically sequenced with TOS logically sequenced with TOS scheduled date every grading period
congruent between content and skills congruent between content and skills
tested tested

2 Test questions were 51%- 51-74% of the test questions were Administered 3 days after the
74%logically sequenced with TOS logically sequenced with TOS scheduled date every grading period
congruent between content and skills congruent between content and skills
tested tested

1 Test questions were 50% and below 50% and below of the test questions Were never administered within the
logically sequenced with TOS were logically sequenced with TOS rating period
congruent between content and skills congruent between content and skills
tested tested

1.4 Pretest and Post- June to 5 Administered 100% Pretest and Post- 100% of Pretest and Post-Test were Pretest and Post-Test were
Test March Test in all classes/subject areas administered in all classes/subject administered on time every rating
supported by analysis report on areas supported by analysis report on period
subject area per class/grade level subject area per class/grade level

4 Administered 85-99% Pretest and 85-99% of Pretest and Post-Test were Submitted a day after the scheduled
Post-Test in all classes/subject areas administered in all classes/subject date every grading period
supported by analysis report on areas supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level subject area per class/grade level

3 Administered 75-84% Pretest and 75-84% of Pretest and Post-Test were Submitted 2 days after the scheduled
Post-Test in all classes/subject areas administered in all classes/subject date
supported by analysis report on areas supported by analysis report on every grading period
subject area per class/grade level subject area per class/grade level
 Major
Final Weigh
Outputs Key Result Objectives Timeline Actual Rating Score
Areas t per Results
(MFOs)
KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness
(KRAs)

2 Administered 51-74% Pretest and 51-74% of Pretest and Post-Test were Submitted 3 days after the scheduled
Post-Test in all classes/subject areas administered in all classes/subject date
supported by analysis report on areas supported by analysis report on every grading period
subject area per class/grade level subject area per class/grade level

1 Pretest and Administered 50% and
below Pretest and Post-Test in all
classes/subject areas supported by
analysis report on subject area per
class/grade level
50% and below of Pretest and Post- Pretest and Post-Test were never
Test were administered in all administered with the rating period
classes/subject areas supported by
analysis report on subject area per
class/grade level

2. Conducted June to 5 Remediation/enrichment programs is 100% of pupils was offered Remediation/enrichment programs
remediation/enrichment March offered to a 100% of pupils who need remediation/enrichment programs were conducted every grading period
programs to _____ pupils it
to improve performance
indicators 4 Remediation/enrichment programs is 85-99% of pupils was offered
offered to a 85%-99% of pupils who remediation/enrichment programs
need it

3 Remediation/enrichment programs is 75-84% of pupils was offered

offered to a 75%-84% of pupils who remediation/
need it enrichment programs

2 Remediation/enrichment programs is 51-74% of pupils was offered

offered to a 51%-74% of pupils who remediation/
need it enrichment programs

1 Remediation/enrichment programs is 50% and below of pupils was offered

offered to a 50% and below of pupils remediation/
who need it enrichment programs

3. Attained the required June to 5 Attained 10% & above MPS increase 10% MPS increase was attained Every grading period
MPS for Grade Level and March
Learning Areas based on 4 Attained 7-9% MPS increase 7-9% MPS increase was attained
baseline target of
diagnostic test every 3 Attained 4-6% MPS increase 4-6% MPS increase was attained
grading period
2 Attained 1-2% MPS increase 1-2% MPS increase was attained
Diagnostic Test _____
1st Quarter Test _____ 1 Attained below 1% MPS increase Below 1% MPS increase was attained
2nd Quarter Test _____
3rd Quarter Test _____
4th Quarter Test _____
 Major
Final
Outputs Key Result Objectives Timeli Actual Rating Score
(MFOs) Areas ne Weig Results
(KRAs) ht per Quality Efficiency Timeliness
KRA

5 No failure. Maintained 0% failure rate/No failure End of school year

4. Decreased/Maintained
failure rate. June
to 4 1 Student failed rate by 85-99% 85-99% decreased failure rate
March

3 2 Student failed rate by 75-84% 75-84% decreased failure rate

2 3 Student failed rate by 51-74% 51-74% decreased failure rate

1 4 Student failed rate by 50% 50% and below decreased failure rate

5. Decreased/Maintained June 5 No dropout. Maintained 0% dropout rate/No End of school year

dropout rate by ___% to dropout
over number of March
enrollees. 4 2 Student dropped rate by 85-99% of 85-99% decreased dropout rate
the previous year
Previous year _____
Current year _____ 3 3 Student dropped rate by 75-84% of 75-84% decreased dropout rate
the previous year

2 4 Student dropped rate by 51-74% of 51-74% decreased dropout rate

the previous year

1 5 Student dropped rate by 50% and 50% and below decreased dropout
below of the previous year rate

6. Increased/Maintained June 5 Increased/Maintained NAT MPS by 90-100% increased/maintained NAT End of school year
NAT MPS by _____ % to 90-100% of previous year MPS
over previous year March
4 Increased NAT MPS by 80-89% of 80-89% increased NAT MPS
Previous year _____ previous year
Current year _____
3 Increased NAT MPS by 75-79% of 75-79% increased NAT MPS
previous year

2 Increased NAT MPS by 70-74% of 70-74% increased NAT MPS

previous year

1 Increased NAT MPS by 70% and 70% and below increased NAT MPS
below of previous year
 Major
Key Result Areas Objectives Timeli Weigh Actual Rating Score
Final
(KRAs) ne t per Results
Outputs
(MFOs) KRA Timeliness
Quality Efficiency

1. Conducted June 5 100% PTA Meeting with Conducted at least 8 PTA 100% PTA Meetings/Conferences was
3. Community regular/periodic PTA to 10 accomplishment and agreement met Meetings/Conferences with 100% conducted with accomplishment and
Involvement Meetings/Conference March % within the rating period. accomplishment with set agreements agreements met
( __%) s within the rating meet
period
4 85-99% PTA Meetings/Conferences Conducted at least 6 PTA 85-99% PTA Meetings/Conferences
was conducted producing only set Meetings/Conferences with was conducted producing only set
agreements and partial accomplishment producing only set agreements and partial
accomplishment within the rating agreements and partial accomplishment
period accomplishment

3 75-84% PTA Meetings/Conferences Conducted at least 4 PTA 75-84% PTA Meetings/Conferences

producing only set agreements within Meetings/Conferences producing only producing only set agreements
the rating period set agreements

2 PTA Meetings/Conferences with Conducted at least 2 PTA 51-74% PTA Meetings/Conferences

minimal result within the rating period Meetings/Conferences with minimal with minimal result
result

1 Conducted one (1) PTA Conducted PTA 50% and below or not conducted PTA
Meeting/Conferences with minimal Meetings/Conferences Meetings/Conferences
result within the rating period.

2. Visited ___ parents June 2% 5 Accomplished set visits with Accomplished 100% of set visits with 100% accomplishment of set visits
of pupils needing to successful intervention within the successful intervention and proper with successful intervention and proper
academic March rating period documentation documentation
monitoring/follow-up
within the rating 4 Accomplished set visits with partial Accomplished 85-99% of set visits 85-99% accomplishment of set visits
period success in implementation of with partial success in implementation with partial success in implementation
intervention within the rating period of intervention and proper of intervention and proper
3. COMMUNITY 3% documentation documentation
INVOLVEMENT/PAR
TICIPATED 3 Accomplished set visits with Accomplished 75-84% of set visits 75-84% accomplishment of set visits
5- AT LEAST 3 suggested planned intervention within with suggested planned intervention with suggested planned intervention
PARTICIPATED the rating period and proper documentation and proper documentation

2 Accomplished set visits with planned Accomplished 51-74% of set visits 51-74% accomplishment of set visits
intervention within the rating period with planned intervention and proper with planned intervention and proper
documentation documentation

1 Accomplished set visits with no Accomplished 50% and below with no 50% and below accomplishment with
intervention within the rating period intervention and proper no intervention and proper
documentation documentation
 Major
Final Weig
Outputs Key Result Objectives Timelin ht per Actual Rating Score
(MFOs) Areas e KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Results
(KRAs)

4. 1. Conducted case June to 5 Conducted at least 1 case 100% of the case study research was Interventions and plan of
Profession study/research in March study/research with full finished on target date of completion action were done after a
al Growth classroom/school district or documentation on completion, month of conducting the
and division within the rating findings, with interventions and plan case study/research
Developm period of action duly noted by the
ent school/district or division
( 15 %)
4 Conducted at least 1 case 90% of study research was finished on
study/research with only 3 indicators target date of completion Interventions and plan of
action were done after 2
months of conducting the
3 Conducted at least 1 case 80% of study research was finished on case study/research
study/research with only 2 indicators target date of completion
Interventions and plan of
2 Conducted at least 1 case action were done after 3
study/research with only 1 indicator 70% of study research was finished on months of conducting the
target date of completion case study/research
1 Proposed case study/research was
not conducted as planned and 60% of study research was finished on Interventions and plan of
approve target date of completion action were done after 4
months of conducting the
case study/research
2. Participated in any June to 5 5 Submitted outstanding documentation Attended a 3-day national level or 6
training/seminar/ workshop March % of training/seminar/workshop days regional or 9 days division Interventions and plan of
attended with pictures and certificates training/workshop seminar. action were done after 5-10
of attendance and participation months of conducting the
case study/research
ARTIFACTS/ATTACHMEN 4 Submitted vs documentation of Attended a 3-day regional level or 6
TS NEEDED training/seminar/workshop attended days division training/workshop Within the rating period
with pictures and certificates of seminar.
attendance and participation

3 Submitted s documentation of Attended a 3-day division level

training/seminar/workshop attended training/workshop seminar
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation

2 Submitted fair documentation of Attended 10 day school level inset

training/seminar/workshop attended training/workshop seminar
with pictures and certificates of
attendance and participation

1 Submitted poor documentation of Attended 5 school inset

training/seminar/workshop attended training/workshop seminar on the
with pictures and certificates of school level
attendance and participation
 Major
Final Weig
Outputs Key Result Objectives Timelin ht per Actual Rating Score
(MFOs) Areas e KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Results
(KRAs)

3. Demonstrated/ June to 5% 5 Reported and left school 15 minutes Not more than 3 times tardy/under Daily
Manifested dedication and March before and after official time time
commitment to work
through: 4 Reported and left school 10 minutes 4-6 times tardy/under time
3.1. Punctuality before and after official time

3 Reported and left school 5 minutes 7-9 times tardy/ under time
before and after official time

2 Reported and left school on 9-12 times tardy/under time

time/within official time

1 Reported to school after official time More than 13 times tardy/under time
and left before or within official time

3.2. Attendance June to 5 Reported to school all the time to Incurred not more than 3 days of Within the rating period
March perform his/her teaching duties and absences
other related functions

4 Reported to school most of the time Incurred 4-7 days of absences

to perform his/her teaching duties and
other related functions

3 Reported to school more often than Incurred 8-11 days of absences

not to perform his/her teaching duties
and other related functions

2 Reported to school sometimes to Incurred 12-15 days of absences

perform his/her teaching duties and
other related functions

1 Reported to school seldom to perform Incurred more than 16 days of

his/her teaching duties and other absences
related functions
5%
4. Observed demo- 5 Observed 10 demonstration Submitted certified true copies of
teachings in a year teachings of colleagues higher in lesson plans and observation sheets
position than the ratee. duly signed by the principal/supervisor

4 Observed 8 demonstration teachings

of colleagues higher in position than
the ratee.

3 Observed 6 demonstration teachings

of colleagues higher in position than
the ratee.
 2 Observed 4 demonstration teachings
of colleagues higher in position than
the rating

1 Observed 2 demonstration teachings

of colleagues higher in position than
the rating

5. Pursued graduate/post- June to 5 Graduated/Currently enrolled in Earned graduate/post-graduate degree Within the rating period
graduate studies March graduate/post-graduate studies or 12 units and above

4 Currently enrolled in graduate post- Earned 9 units

graduate studies

3 Currently enrolled in graduate post- Earned 3-6 units

graduate studies

2 Sought the approval of the Division Currently enrolled

Office

1 Prepared requirement for the study Currently enrolled

permit

6. Developed teaching/ June to 5 Developed 5 or more teaching 100% of the resources submitted, Within the rating period
learning resources to fill in March resources duly recognized by the followed prescribed format as
the gaps/needs of the division and for implementation in the mandated and acknowledged by the
school field division

4 Developed 4 teaching resources duly 90% of the resources submitted,

recognized by the division and for followed prescribed format as
implementation in the district mandated and acknowledged by the
division

3 Developed 3 teaching resources duly 80% of the resources submitted,

recognized by the division and for followed prescribed format as
implementation in the school mandated and acknowledged by the
division

2 Developed 2 teaching resources duly 70% of the resources submitted,

recognized by the school and for followed prescribed format as
implementation in the subject area of mandated and acknowledged by the
the school division

1 Developed 1 teaching resource duly 60% of the resources submitted,

recognized by the school and is followed prescribed format as
utilized by the teacher mandated and acknowledged by the
division

SUBTOTAL:
BONA ALELEE S. ARELLANO TOTAL
GENELYN I. SANDE Ratee
Rater
JOCELYN A. LOPEZ