Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Adrian P. Braybrooke
and an assistant principal in a progressive, affluent school district in the South. She is
approached by the parents of a severely disabled tenth-grade student to have their son,
Jonathan, attend one of the schools in this district. Jonathan has multiple disabilities requiring
constant care by a specially trained nurse. He is profoundly mentally disabled, has spastic
quadriplegia, and has a seizure disorder. Young refuses the parents’ request due to
extraordinary expense and a view that the school is not the most appropriate placement for
Jonathan. Is Young’s decision defensible? Why or why not? Present both sides of the argument.
Based on the text and court cases, how do you feel the court will rule in this case? Be sure to list
Scenario
needs constant care from a special trained nurse. Jonathan’s parents ask Debbie Young to be in
her school, but she denies him because of his disabilities, claiming that it would be too much of
Pro Young1
Young’s decision could have many factors—while the financial aspect is understandable, one
may question how Jonathan preformed in school prior to this request. If he was passing, then
Young’s decision may be withheld as such is similar to the Board of Education of Hendrick
Hudson Central School District v. Rowley. In this case, parents of a deaf student tried to get their
child an ASL interpreter. When denied, they filed against the school district. However, the
Supreme Court decided that because their daughter could pass school and preform adequately
without the ASL interpreter, she did not need one. Schools must provide reasonable
modifications, not the best ones. This may hold in Debbie Young’s case as well.
Pro Young.
Another case that could support Young and her decision is LT v. Warwick School
Committee. In this case, a parent declined the program offered by the district to assist her child.
Instead, she insisted on a different one. The school refused and the Court backed the school’s
suggestion, claiming they only provide what is reasonable. The same could be assumed in
Pro Jonathan.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro could relate to Jonathan’s case. Although the
grounds of the case differ, the ruling could be understood to this case as well. In the Court’s
ruling of this case, they claim, “that [the program] was related to the effort to educate because
it was a service necessary in order to allow the student to remain in the classroom.” Under the
same idea, the court could see that it is necessary Jonathan go to this school in order to
Pro Jonathan.
McLaughlin v Holt Public Schools relates to this case to a T. In this case, the Court claims
“that a student could be served outside of the neighborhood school if another school in the
district, rather than the neighborhood school, offered the program the student needed.” With
this in mind, Jonathan’s case can be viewed the same way. Perhaps Young’s school can provide
services to Jonathan that he requires; therefore, the court would rule in his favor.
Opinion.
Quite honestly, I feel like the scenario is too vague. Does Debbie Young work in a Public
school? Or a charter school? These would affect the circumstances. How was Jonathan
preforming before? I know that the scenario states that Debbie Young has worked as a SPED
educator before, but does her school offer programs to benefit those that need special
education?
References
McLaughlin v Holt Public Schools, 133 F. Supp. 2d 994 (W.D. Mich. 2001)
Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176
(1982).